For goodness sake, put 2 x identical fast card slots in new cameras! This camera should have 2 x CF Express type B, entry level cameras should have 2 x fast SD Cards, and no camera should have 1 x CF Express and 1 x SD!
Yes if its really $6k it better have dual CFE and sd compatible slots. I mean raw support chews through cards like nothing so if it truly has raw then it’ll need dual cf express slots.
@@BubblesPothowari Old CF cards were just 167 MB/s, New CF EXpress type 'B' cards are 1700 MB/s, whilst SD UHS II cards are only 300MB/s, I think you need to review your comment!
@@stevewestonphotography if I am saving on 300 Mbps SD card, 1700 Mbps speed of CF is slaved to 300 Mbps. Why not 2 CF cards !! Saving 30 Raw files, may be 40 mb each, over 1 GB data at 300 mbps SD card is making 1700 CF Card wait for its lazy partner...... Hence a SD card throttles a CF card.
It looks like Panasonic is still working on to catch up with Canon and Sony on the eye face detection technology. They may release this key technology in GH6 by Nov/ Dec..but in the mean time they have no other choice. The general feedback shows the GH5 mark 2 is not very exciting.
If the GH6 really has phase detect AF and if it is as good as the Canons or Sonys AF then it would be so interesting to see Panasonic coming into the game as somethg more mainstream, and it would set a whole new ‘phase’ for greater competition and better cameras that are even more affordable 👍😊
What do you say about the rumour that Canon planed to put the R3 out as R1 at first but than Sony came along with their A1 with 50MP/30fps so Canon decided to bring the R1 as R3?
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker yes, but Sony does 30fps with 50mp and Canon only 30fps with 30mp. So it is a bit less capable. And a R1 named camera would look bad against the A1 even if it came out months later.
If Canon is smart, they may put one of the slot also compatible with CF express type A (like the Sony A1). So you have the choice to use the CFexpress type B, Type A and SD if you dont need much speed or for backup
Thanks for the update! I've been wondering about the megapixels. Not being an action shooter this camera doesn't interest me except for the possibility of a higher maximum flash sync speed. This is by far the most important spec for me as a shooter of outdoor portraits, fitness, glamour, and fashion where I need to beat the sun in order to control the light without using funky HSS. I doubt if it will approach the 1/2000 sec that the Hasselblad and Phase I cameras achieve with their leaf shutter lenses, but you never know until the announcement and most people don't care so it might not even be part of the announcement.
My understanding with the GH5 Mark II, Is that the biggest change is they gave it a processor upgrade so that they could continue upgrading the firmware because they had pretty much reached the power limit that the current processor had, and it’s still a very viable camera so they probably still want to sell them for those who don’t want to pay 2500 for the GH6. Also they added much better face detection and tracking capabilities and I think from the reviews I’ve seen they’ve actually said it’s better than the S5.
Big question is?? What is the readout speed of the sensor? If it's not A9 or A1 fast this camera won't be as good as the R5 IMO. Also, does it have a 20fps mechanical shutter mode like the 1dxm3? If so many people will love this camera.
It won't be less than 995,000,000 pps, that's what the 1DX III can handle. The specs tell us who the camera is designed for, not how capable it is. Me curious!
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker I believe the a1 and a2 have a 6ms sensor readout the A1 is under 5ms. Canon needs to be under 8 to be competive... or have that 20fps mechanical..
Hmmm...I expected more MP. The list of things I dont like when I see this spec is long. The A1 does it better basically in any area and is just a bit more expensive.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker We don't know yet whether it competes. If the af is faster and better than the A1....then it certainly competes for sports and wildlife shooters. Its not all about MP's.
If it does'nt overheat, and is reliable as a 1dx i would buy. I do want to see the frame rates for video to. The A1 doesnt have RF mount. The team was getting a 90 percent keep ratio at f1.2 with the R5. For the weddings, that is incredible. We couldn't use it for video as it was unreliable. The 1Dx mk ii has been our go to.
I would be shocked if the GH6 has phase detect. Also I have stayed with Panasonic and not switched yet. I have been super impressed with the new Firmware update that just came out for my panasonic G9. For a talking head video such as this it's been perfect and it's animal, human, face, and eye detection has been great. Really want a S5 but I just feel like I need to wait and see what the GH6 bring to the table!
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Panasonics manual focus does work great. Especially with the awsome app and technologyto focus ability. But the new firmware update to all the cameras except the gh5 mark 1 allows solid autofocus for most situations.
For me, the right sensor, wrong body, and price, 2 different card formats is a bit disappointing given its performance level. But this sensor in an R5/6 size body and I'd be interested... Still, time is on my side and as it stands, I probably won't upgrade my camera this year, or at least not until the end of the year.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Perhaps, Canon's biggest competitor is Canon. It seems like the R3 will be equal or better than anything else on the market and it's not a flagship.
I am forced to use the Ninja V just to bypass that %*~¥€!! Self-imposed limit . Why won’t Canon remove it ? This has caused issues when filming on a few occasions that I don’t use the Ninja V
Welcome back, news has been very slow and we still don’t know important things about the camera. It’s going to be an interesting release day to see if there are any surprises
Not really surprising, about the right megapixels for action shooting. Possibly a little too few for wild life but still better than 24 mega pixels. No mention of that eye autofocus
Seems a bit overpriced compared to the competition (A1). This also would imply that the R1 will be.. very expensive. Out of my price range, that's for sure! Then again, I'm not a professional..
If it delivered better sports performance than the 1DX III, then you're getting it for $500 less. But the telling part if true, means the R1 will cost that much more than the 1DX III
You validated GH6 rumprs with your own video about multiple versions of the GH6. Sony does not make a new sensor for the fun of it, Panasonic and Olympus have to buy in an promise to use new sensors. Sony has two new Micro FourThirds sensors, one capable of doing 8K and a 20mp stacked BSi sensor thar gives one to two stops of extra dynamic range and has built in phase detect autofocus if the manufacturer decides to use it. As currently announced the GH6 will use the 20mp sensor but look for another model using 8K sensor but only as a high mp photo camera. Because of hear, additional battery capacity and needing dual processors the GH6 camera needs a complete redesign to do 8K video. Look for 8K BGH2 first. If you noticed my predictions about R3 were totally accurate. Prototypes went to key professionals last week.
But will you even be able to get one by end of year with chip shortages and demand for agencies before Olympics? I’ve saving my pennies. If it has 6K internal RAW without overheating or until battery dies Im picking one up. DR should finally be competitive for once from Canon.
That is way too expensive, isn't it? I recently got the R6 for almost half the price of the R3 and honestly, it doesn't seem that the R3 brings double the value. It seems to me that it's a camera to keep existing Canon DSLR users but if Canon wants to increase their market share they need to either lower the price or add more features. A1 seems a much better option than the R3 in my opinion
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Two cfexpress type B card slots would create massive heat issues.......Just feel the heat generated when you upload files from the card to your computer using a card reader......
It looks fine on my screen. The IRE for most of my face is between 60 to 75. It only goes 95 IRE right on the side of my face. A little over exposed in one place is okay. It could depend on what you're watching on and the display settings as well. On my TV, my vids look terrible when I leave the TV in Game mode ;)
If I had a million dollars... Are you ready to get out there? We are getting our second shot next weekend. I hope to go downtown to see Patrick to pick up the 100mm. I also expect to be getting the 85mm soon. We should definitely do something with it.
The FR5 serves the birders fine. I don't think they need the R3 or R1. They need quality lenses. I love the 800mm, but at f11, there's too much noise for most of them. Its fine for me, but the EF 100-400 would work better.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Actually, they do. They need to top the A1. While the R5 is great value for money as compared to the A1, Canon still needs a proper flagship to compete or dethrone the A1.
If the auto focus is quicker...especially animal eye af tracking performance, then this camera is great for birders.....Most are shooting electronic shutter on the R5 to get the 20fps anyway, with compressed raw which creates smaller file sizes, and the resolution is fine. Its the auto focus speed and frames per second that matters most here.
Hum… first look at the specs the mp isn’t that high enough for crop images when u editing. Second with new ninja V+ added on R5 who r going to buy R3 for $6000 😱😱😱 over sampled 4K+ 30fps not worth $6000 at all. Not smart moving for selling r3 but I am pretty sure more people going to buy R5 🤔🤔🤔 maybe canon just want to sell more R5 hahaha 🤣
30mp is fine for fast action, but I would have expected a high frame rate. But keep in mind specs don't tell the story, they give you the plot points. How everything works together matters. The end results. For me, the R5 is definitely better for what I do. I wold not consider the R3.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Not meant as some creepy way to find out where you live (hopefully it didn’t come across that way!). Just looking for a good spot to film some of these astronomical phenomena. I tried doing the Perseid meteor shower last year, with.. poor results.
Man you should really do something about the video quality, the colours are completely washed out. Seriously, it is about the same (colour) quality as my GoPro hero 6...
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker it does not look good. Your skin is completely blown out, colours are faded. Also the image is not sharp at all, looks like 1080 footage upscaled to 4k. I watch this on a 24 inch iMac with True Tone turned off. I watch 4k footage all the time, have no problems.
The video is sharp along the focus plain. The background is blurred due to the depth of field. That's to be expected. Watching on the M1 MBA. 1080 does look soft, but 4K looks good. I just looked at it from the RUclips copy and not my original. I did bring down saturation a little.
Doug, I am shooting B roll for the Tour Box I'm doing a review of. All the product shots are in 8K. I'm finding 8K to be far more useful than I expected. It's a nice capability.
Please tell me who must pay and buy this uselessness? Canon R3 - 30MP - 30fps - 4K video - 6000$ Sony A1 - 50MP - 30fps - 8K video - 6500$. Canon kidding to their fans.... P.S. - I imagined R3 specs like this - 100MP-14-16 bit - 20-30fps(in different resolutions), 8K -24-25-30-50-60fps RAW, 4K - 120-240fps -RAW, FULL HD - 300fps - price 5500-6000$. but they did that always they do. They are always kidding to all the world photographers and videographers, this is really CRAP, no camera.
For goodness sake, put 2 x identical fast card slots in new cameras! This camera should have 2 x CF Express type B, entry level cameras should have 2 x fast SD Cards, and no camera should have 1 x CF Express and 1 x SD!
Yes if its really $6k it better have dual CFE and sd compatible slots. I mean raw support chews through cards like nothing so if it truly has raw then it’ll need dual cf express slots.
SD speed rules over on CF !!!
@@BubblesPothowari Old CF cards were just 167 MB/s, New CF EXpress type 'B' cards are 1700 MB/s, whilst SD UHS II cards are only 300MB/s, I think you need to review your comment!
@@stevewestonphotography if I am saving on 300 Mbps SD card, 1700 Mbps speed of CF is slaved to 300 Mbps. Why not 2 CF cards !! Saving 30 Raw files, may be 40 mb each, over 1 GB data at 300 mbps SD card is making 1700 CF Card wait for its lazy partner...... Hence a SD card throttles a CF card.
Nice, Nice, Nice Canon .I have canon since 1986 and I still in love with Canon. Have never break my heart.
It looks like Panasonic is still working on to catch up with Canon and Sony on the eye face detection technology. They may release this key technology in GH6 by Nov/ Dec..but in the mean time they have no other choice. The general feedback shows the GH5 mark 2 is not very exciting.
If the GH6 really has phase detect AF and if it is as good as the Canons or Sonys AF then it would be so interesting to see Panasonic coming into the game as somethg more mainstream, and it would set a whole new ‘phase’ for greater competition and better cameras that are even
more affordable 👍😊
What do you say about the rumour that Canon planed to put the R3 out as R1 at first but than Sony came along with their A1 with 50MP/30fps so Canon decided to bring the R1 as R3?
It will be comparable I suspect. Better data through put though
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker yes, but Sony does 30fps with 50mp and Canon only 30fps with 30mp. So it is a bit less capable. And a R1 named camera would look bad against the A1 even if it came out months later.
If Canon is smart, they may put one of the slot also compatible with CF express type A (like the Sony A1). So you have the choice to use the CFexpress type B, Type A and SD if you dont need much speed or for backup
Thanks for the update! I've been wondering about the megapixels. Not being an action shooter this camera doesn't interest me except for the possibility of a higher maximum flash sync speed. This is by far the most important spec for me as a shooter of outdoor portraits, fitness, glamour, and fashion where I need to beat the sun in order to control the light without using funky HSS. I doubt if it will approach the 1/2000 sec that the Hasselblad and Phase I cameras achieve with their leaf shutter lenses, but you never know until the announcement and most people don't care so it might not even be part of the announcement.
Definitely true- for example,the A1 is ONE FULL STOP faster than a Z7 II...very significant difference before you are forced to kick into HSS
My understanding with the GH5 Mark II, Is that the biggest change is they gave it a processor upgrade so that they could continue upgrading the firmware because they had pretty much reached the power limit that the current processor had, and it’s still a very viable camera so they probably still want to sell them for those who don’t want to pay 2500 for the GH6. Also they added much better face detection and tracking capabilities and I think from the reviews I’ve seen they’ve actually said it’s better than the S5.
Big question is?? What is the readout speed of the sensor? If it's not A9 or A1 fast this camera won't be as good as the R5 IMO.
Also, does it have a 20fps mechanical shutter mode like the 1dxm3? If so many people will love this camera.
It won't be less than 995,000,000 pps, that's what the 1DX III can handle. The specs tell us who the camera is designed for, not how capable it is. Me curious!
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker I believe the a1 and a2 have a 6ms sensor readout the A1 is under 5ms. Canon needs to be under 8 to be competive... or have that 20fps mechanical..
Do you think they’ll add eye controlled focus to any other canon cameras
Yes, especially at this price range.
Hmmm...I expected more MP. The list of things I dont like when I see this spec is long. The A1 does it better basically in any area and is just a bit more expensive.
It's not meant to compete with the A1, that's for the R1. $6000 doesn't make sense to me. I feel it would be better situated at $4500 to $5500.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker We don't know yet whether it competes. If the af is faster and better than the A1....then it certainly competes for sports and wildlife shooters. Its not all about MP's.
If it does'nt overheat, and is reliable as a 1dx i would buy. I do want to see the frame rates for video to. The A1 doesnt have RF mount. The team was getting a 90 percent keep ratio at f1.2 with the R5. For the weddings, that is incredible. We couldn't use it for video as it was unreliable. The 1Dx mk ii has been our go to.
I would be shocked if the GH6 has phase detect. Also I have stayed with Panasonic and not switched yet. I have been super impressed with the new Firmware update that just came out for my panasonic G9. For a talking head video such as this it's been perfect and it's animal, human, face, and eye detection has been great.
Really want a S5 but I just feel like I need to wait and see what the GH6 bring to the table!
Agreed. Manual AF is works well in so many areas. I do hope like move to phaser detect. They need it to push sales.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Panasonics manual focus does work great. Especially with the awsome app and technologyto focus ability. But the new firmware update to all the cameras except the gh5 mark 1 allows solid autofocus for most situations.
Are there information about the mechanical shutter fps of the R3?
none yet
For me, the right sensor, wrong body, and price, 2 different card formats is a bit disappointing given its performance level. But this sensor in an R5/6 size body and I'd be interested...
Still, time is on my side and as it stands, I probably won't upgrade my camera this year, or at least not until the end of the year.
Sounds like Canon has crippled the R3 enough to get people to desire the R1.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Perhaps, Canon's biggest competitor is Canon. It seems like the R3 will be equal or better than anything else on the market and it's not a flagship.
I'm an R5 shooter and not interested in any new Canons until they ditch the 30 min recording limit for video. Canon you listening?
here here!
I am forced to use the Ninja V just to bypass that %*~¥€!! Self-imposed limit .
Why won’t Canon remove it ? This has caused issues when filming on a few occasions that I don’t use the Ninja V
Another beast by Canon. If Sony does not announce the A7iv I September, I think I may go the EOS R6 route.
If there is a 14 to 35 2.8 is coming then what is the use of a 15-35 ?????
Welcome back, news has been very slow and we still don’t know important things about the camera. It’s going to be an interesting release day to see if there are any surprises
Even this wasn't that big a news story ;)
Not really surprising, about the right megapixels for action shooting. Possibly a little too few for wild life but still better than 24 mega pixels. No mention of that eye autofocus
Agreed. I'm sure it has eye af.
So was the R3 announced? I haven't seen any updates from anyone.
It wasn't. Looks like this was a false alarm.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Thanks.
Despite the rain, great spring colours and video quality. Missed you!
Thanks Andreas.
Thanks for the breakdown! 29th am in Japan is 28th pm in the states!
Amazing camera !!!!
I'd love to play around with it.
Phase detect on GH6 is going to be game changing
any news on the sony A74 yet?
0
Thanks great video
Very welcome
Seems a bit overpriced compared to the competition (A1).
This also would imply that the R1 will be.. very expensive.
Out of my price range, that's for sure! Then again, I'm not a professional..
The Alpha 1 is $500 more and that's before buying a vertical grip, which is built into the R3. Overpriced? IMO that's the Alpha 1.
U get what u pay for
Welcome back, Simon! Alpha 1 is getting nervous. As for phase detection in the GH6: they gotta show me.
Hopefully things pick up a little.
This specification, no place to be faulty，except for price
If it delivered better sports performance than the 1DX III, then you're getting it for $500 less. But the telling part if true, means the R1 will cost that much more than the 1DX III
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Yes ，it is very attractive！
EOS R3 sounds almost perfect. I just wish Canon would release a pro body with matching dual card slots. They came close with the R6,
Totally agree. Sony does with the a7S3 and newer... dual SD and CF cards.
You validated GH6 rumprs with your own video about multiple versions of the GH6. Sony does not make a new sensor for the fun of it, Panasonic and Olympus have to buy in an promise to use new sensors. Sony has two new Micro FourThirds sensors, one capable of doing 8K and a 20mp stacked BSi sensor thar gives one to two stops of extra dynamic range and has built in phase detect autofocus if the manufacturer decides to use it. As currently announced the GH6 will use the 20mp sensor but look for another model using 8K sensor but only as a high mp photo camera. Because of hear, additional battery capacity and needing dual processors the GH6 camera needs a complete redesign to do 8K video. Look for 8K BGH2 first.
If you noticed my predictions about R3 were totally accurate. Prototypes went to key professionals last week.
Much better video this time.
Thank you
But will you even be able to get one by end of year with chip shortages and demand for agencies before Olympics? I’ve saving my pennies. If it has 6K internal RAW without overheating or until battery dies Im picking one up. DR should finally be competitive for once from Canon.
You need to know if it's something you want, then. be the first to preorder to have a chance.
Nice, but I want 45mp and two CFexpress Type B slots. R1 please.
here here
Why should someone buy this R3 when they can almost get an A1 in terms of price? The only reason may be lenses that have already been purchased.
Good point.
@Kankan Jyoti Misra 😂😂😂
I wonder if the R3 will have a record limit.
I'm willing to bet it will ;)
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker 🤦♂️
That is way too expensive, isn't it?
I recently got the R6 for almost half the price of the R3 and honestly, it doesn't seem that the R3 brings double the value. It seems to me that it's a camera to keep existing Canon DSLR users but if Canon wants to increase their market share they need to either lower the price or add more features.
A1 seems a much better option than the R3 in my opinion
As a hybrid shooter, the R3 is not for me.
The R5 is a better camera for my needs. At least until R1 drops.
3 series made to wait for 1 series...
I don't think R and RP will be replaced
They won't have a successor, but there will be cameras coming out to take their place in the he lineup.
SD card slot will be a deal breaker for many pros
Agreed. Surprised by that. Canon's cripple hammer to force them not the R1.... seriously, anything above the R5 should have two Cfe.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Canon R1 have 2 CF express cards and 8k to justify the difference between the R1 & R3?
I expect 45mp, 8K video on the R1 for sure. Dual CFe
I recently pre-ordered the RF 100 macro lens as well. Hope it's not backordered for months.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Two cfexpress type B card slots would create massive heat issues.......Just feel the heat generated when you upload files from the card to your computer using a card reader......
The camera is so good, the function is comprehensive, but the price 6000usd··· a bit expensive
It's out of my reach.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker No, you will have one😂
If I aim that high, it'll be the R1 ;)
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Strong support, 👍👍that's wonderful！👍😂
If I get enough people using the affiliate links for the R3, it will help for sure.
Pretty exciting!
Yep... but its the more affordable cameras I'm interested in, except for the R1 of course ;)
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker it’s that bleeding edge tech that eventually trickles down the the more affordable/practical pieces of gear.
your video is a little bright maybe bring contrast up and shadow ?
It looks fine on my screen. The IRE for most of my face is between 60 to 75. It only goes 95 IRE right on the side of my face. A little over exposed in one place is okay. It could depend on what you're watching on and the display settings as well. On my TV, my vids look terrible when I leave the TV in Game mode ;)
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker ok
Granted, its not perfect. Next video I paid more attention to the IRE and should have a better look.
you are amazing and not an ordinary film maker more like extraordinary !@@OrdinaryFilmmaker
If I had the money... I still wouldn't buy the R3. Like you, I am content with what I have now.
If I had a million dollars... Are you ready to get out there? We are getting our second shot next weekend. I hope to go downtown to see Patrick to pick up the 100mm. I also expect to be getting the 85mm soon. We should definitely do something with it.
The birders are out. 30 MP is too low res. That will be my guess.
The FR5 serves the birders fine. I don't think they need the R3 or R1. They need quality lenses. I love the 800mm, but at f11, there's too much noise for most of them. Its fine for me, but the EF 100-400 would work better.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Actually, they do. They need to top the A1. While the R5 is great value for money as compared to the A1, Canon still needs a proper flagship to compete or dethrone the A1.
If the auto focus is quicker...especially animal eye af tracking performance, then this camera is great for birders.....Most are shooting electronic shutter on the R5 to get the 20fps anyway, with compressed raw which creates smaller file sizes, and the resolution is fine. Its the auto focus speed and frames per second that matters most here.
HA!!! "keep my voice down because my wife doesn't like me getting them"... good thing she doesn't watch your videos lmao🤣
Nope, she watches other things ;)
I think it might be announced before the convention .
I am waiting for sony to release a74 with almost the same specifications (except the battery of course) at a much lower price 😃
We got the A1, the a74 was to be weeks later... we're still waiting...
What is crippling in a camera like that is the lack of dual cf express card slots. 🤦🏾♂️
Old man brain! I have that too! 8-)
yeah, sucks doesn't it... ;)
Interested to see how accurate the rumors will be on the 29th and where the hammer shows up
Indeed.
Good to see you again!
Thanks Waitech!
Canon already have a RF 14-35 (f2.8) so the new one must be f4.
Canon on the other hand have absolutely non RF primes wider than 35 ☹️
I'll wait for the R1, the R3 30 mp is a deal breaker for me..
Oops! The date apparently WASN'T June 29.
Nope. Craig put out a message stating he got this one wrong. It happens.
Great information Simon.
Glad you enjoyed it
Where have you been??
Waiting for news ;) Nothing of substance has been coming out so I just chilled. I also am reviewing a few products that is taking some time.
Always Brilliant content
Thanks bud!
Was wondering where you were but yeah been no news as you said.
Quite the difference from last year.
Hum… first look at the specs the mp isn’t that high enough for crop images when u editing. Second with new ninja V+ added on R5 who r going to buy R3 for $6000 😱😱😱 over sampled 4K+ 30fps not worth $6000 at all. Not smart moving for selling r3 but I am pretty sure more people going to buy R5 🤔🤔🤔 maybe canon just want to sell more R5 hahaha 🤣
30mp is fine for fast action, but I would have expected a high frame rate. But keep in mind specs don't tell the story, they give you the plot points. How everything works together matters. The end results. For me, the R5 is definitely better for what I do. I wold not consider the R3.
I’ll stick to Sony still
15:10 Aurora, ON?
maybe...
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Not meant as some creepy way to find out where you live (hopefully it didn’t come across that way!). Just looking for a good spot to film some of these astronomical phenomena.
I tried doing the Perseid meteor shower last year, with.. poor results.
canon R6 here I come 6000 dollars . Now we are getting less things for more money . Canon is pushing us to the S. Or F
canon is hiding r1 :D
Yeah... they want to celebrate their new child, the R3... The R1 will likely get a dev announcement this fall, and be released next year.
Man you should really do something about the video quality, the colours are completely washed out. Seriously, it is about the same (colour) quality as my GoPro hero 6...
Check you video settings. The colours are accurate.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker it does not look good. Your skin is completely blown out, colours are faded. Also the image is not sharp at all, looks like 1080 footage upscaled to 4k. I watch this on a 24 inch iMac with True Tone turned off. I watch 4k footage all the time, have no problems.
The video is sharp along the focus plain. The background is blurred due to the depth of field. That's to be expected. Watching on the M1 MBA. 1080 does look soft, but 4K looks good. I just looked at it from the RUclips copy and not my original. I did bring down saturation a little.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker I aware of the DOF concept. I have a much less capable camera Nikon Z7, still my footage looks much sharper.
not great video specs for the R3
Really? Those video specs are in the right direction.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker I wanted 8 k lol
Doug, I am shooting B roll for the Tour Box I'm doing a review of. All the product shots are in 8K. I'm finding 8K to be far more useful than I expected. It's a nice capability.
what news
Please tell me who must pay and buy this uselessness?
Canon R3 - 30MP - 30fps - 4K video - 6000$
Sony A1 - 50MP - 30fps - 8K video - 6500$.
Canon kidding to their fans....
P.S. - I imagined R3 specs like this - 100MP-14-16 bit - 20-30fps(in different resolutions), 8K -24-25-30-50-60fps RAW, 4K - 120-240fps -RAW, FULL HD - 300fps - price 5500-6000$. but they did that always they do. They are always kidding to all the world photographers and videographers, this is really CRAP, no camera.
you are too bright Simon
Thanks. My wife thinks I'm smart too!