Fuji GFX 100S VS GFX 50SII - WATCH THIS BEFORE YOU PURCHASE!! Full REVIEW With raw files Download
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2024
- My Lightroom presets www.prophotoedits.com
My Creative & Fine Art Lighting and Editing online class
creativelightingcourse.com
MY AMAZON FUJI & CANON AFFILIATE LINKS - THESE HELP ME WHEN YOU PURCHASE GEAR. I NEVER RECOMMEND GEAR THAT I DON'T USE!
a.co/e1xUpfN
15% off lensrentals with my code JMARCUS15
you have to use my link below though
www.lensrentals.com/?source=p...
My Instagram / j.marcusphotographer
Raw Files
drive.google.com/drive/folder...
Video chapters
00:00 intro
01:57 my course ON SALE!
03:02 50sii eye af
04:40 gfx 100s eye af
07:08 50sii eye af hit rate
11:42 100s eye af hit rate
18:56 focus speed battle
21:59 LOW light battle and screen resolution issues
27:35 IMAGE REVIEW INTRO
28:35 high iso results
33:25 dynamic range results
38:10 highlight recovery results
41:47 First file comparison harsh light
45:43 model file comparisons 1
50:37 model file comparisons 2
54:58 indoor file comparisons
108:20 my thoughts about each camera! 
Кино
Best comparison ever…Whole community should be thankful.. Thanks a ton for such time and effort..
@J. Marcus
Thank you for making this video! I tested both 50SII and 100S side by side. I noticed that the viewfinder is the same, while AF performance on 100S is slightly faster, but color science and fidelity from 50SII look likable. The GFX100 (original) has the best viewfinder I have ever tested. The best possible tip for faster AF on 50SII is whatever you want to focus on; it needed light to give it accurate focusing. For example, shooting in a studio with 50SII will hunt and struggle due to low light, but if you turn on the modeling lamp on the strobe (bright), it wouldn't have an issue focusing. Manual focusing is a skill that is more accessible as the long focus peaking, zoomed in, and monochrome on the viewfinder. While AF performance from 50SII is slower than 100S, the image quality and tonality still shine! GFX100S/100 is fantastic but will eat storage spaces since it is 102MP and will slow down workflow! GFX50SII is faster than most Film MF cameras and even Phase One. Here's what I hope for in the future; If Fujifilm can bring us a GFX body with a stacked sensor as they did with X-H2s, it would be a game changer!
Prolly the most thorough comparison I've seen, thanks to you (and to your models) for the care and time invested!
Thank you so much!! I was genuinely curious myself, about which one would be right for me.
True that!!! 💯
Yesss... thank you for this, and all the work and time involved. You managed to show the differences in depth, not like other reviews I've seen.
I have the 50sii and love working with the files in Capture One, but it only got me wondering what the 100s would be like. Gonna roll with the 50 for a year or two more...
Absolutely outstanding comparison! I had just about decided on the 50Sii, and then started wondering if I should stretch it (a lot) and try to get the 100S. Your providing the raw files to play with is incredibly helpful, and I will play with these to see how it works out on my computer. Thank you for that!
Glad I could help! I’m in the same boat at the moment!
Thank you for all the effort put into this and for the downloads. I've rented the 50SII for some commercial jobs and all my prospective clients call out those shoots as examples of what they want. After downloading your files and pulling into CP1, I INSTANTLY preferred the 50SII flat raws and edits. I'm like you and wish there was the 50 sensor with the phase detect focus. Instant purchase and would be happy for years. Thanks again J. Marcus!! (and beautiful kids bro!!)
I really appreciate that!! I’m in the same boat… deciding if I want to upgrade to the 100s and lose a bit of contrast….
Great video and man you really dove in head first down that rabbit hole of comparisons. Thank You !!! It's why i never miss any of your content.....So I'm not crazy.... the files really are different. I still have my 50R and shoot with it when I want the colors to pop (magic). The colors on the 100s are still good but man I remember the first time I looked at the files from the 100s I was depressed. everything is a trade off. Ive gotten used to the 100s colors over time and I shoot more black and white than I do color so the color "palette" for me is not my highest priority with either camera. The 100s is just a better overall camera if you can deal with the massive file sizes and slow work flow when it comes to editing. I will probably have to let go of one of them at some point as I shoot primarily with my Nikon Z7 and Z6. I say that but i shot a lot of fall foliage last month and I shot it all with the 50R. The files were stunning. I hate the ergonomics of the 50R but for me that original sensor is in a class by itself so I deal with it. The 100s is just amazing in a different way and I love them both for different reasons. One of them does have to go at some point which will be a sad day either way.
Very helpful, thank you for the detailed comparison and sample files, perfect package, I wish all reviewers approach the topic with such passion!
Thank you so much!! I’m definitely interested in this since I’m on the fence myself!
Thanks for this...Thus the reason I am keeping my 2 x GFX50s's. I will get the new GFX50SMKll for the IBIS and the wonderful good old sensor.
Thanks man for this in depth video plus the raw files for us too try it out aw well. Straight up course material you made and we're appreciative!
Thank you!! Not a problem at all!!!
Yes, I found that the best way to get the most out of either is to have the fastest card as well to minimise Write time as well and display preview to slow life down as well. The edit is definitely different and yes capture one still better process for fuji raw data. I only ever used uncompressed as well but I don't like any compromise and my system is fast enough plus I don't shoot frames that are unnecessary.
The best comparison imaginable! Thank you so much! For me the AF on the 50s is fine. I am used to the xt2 and it was totally fine at that time. Medium format look for around 3k! That’s awesomeness!
Thank you!! Yes the gfx system is really awesome! The lenses are second to none as well!
This was the video I was after! I was on the fence between 50s and 100s. Think I’m leaning towards the 100s. Thank you Marcus!
Beautiful work! Thanks for the in-depth review.
Thank you so much! No problem at all!
You told me you was going to see the gfx 100s and you did. Many thanks for taking us in consideration. I love my 100s, I thought that 50sII would have an edge on iso test and af. Thanks for sharing
I remember as a Canon shooter when the 5D Mark IV came out I hated the new colors.after a little bit of time I grew to really like the files on the camera and after a few updates to Adobe and firmware updates from Cannon I liked the colors even better . I think we all have our favorite camera, mine is the 1Ds Mark III. It seems like nothing has nicer midtones than that Camera, but It could never replace the 5D Mark IV because of all of its modern functions. I think overtime that 100s from Fuji would be your go to camera. No amount of great color can compensate for a missed shot. Nice review I watched it beginning to end and appreciated your real world inputs on the files and the cameras.
Thank you so much! That’s a lot of commitment to watch all the way through! I’m thinking the same thing! I really enjoyed the 100s. No complaints while shooting with it.
Really loved the video mate! Merry Christmas from Brisbane, Australia
Merry Christmas!! Thank you!!
I never comment on a video but this video is incredible. Sold me on the camera and its abilities.
Thank you so much! I’m saving for my 100s as well
If you run the calculation through PhotoPills, the Mitakon 65mm f1.4 offers pretty much the same shallow depth of field as the Mamiya 80mm f1.9 but with a wider FOV.
An extremely helpful video that answers many of my questions. It was thoroughly enjoyable. I sense that both of these cameras provide the capability of producing excellent photos. I've handled the 100S in a camera store and was duly impressed. Hasn't been possible to get my hands on the 50SII but it would seem that their handling is the same, except for the difference in auto focus. In a nut shell for me the 50SII looks the most suitable option as its files are much smaller (by 50%) and the cost is similarly - smaller! Yes, the absence of Phase Detection is regrettable but understandable with the different sensor and I get the impression that Contrast Detection in Single Focus mode is suited to my needs. Either camera is not designed to cope with people on rapid movement or where events move sharply. Perfect, I think.
Thank you so much! Yes definitely agree! The 50sii has been great for my needs for quite a while. I think once I’m able I’ll upgrade to the 100s just because it’s a bit better in low light so I’ll want to use it in studio more. Both files are incredible to me
I used Lightroom once with the 100S and that's all it took for me to never ever go back to using it, capture one works a million times better with the 100S. I am really pleased that you got to use the 100S
I can’t wait to try it! Yes I’m hooked on the 100s now
Great video as always. I think you should get it and update your presets for us! It is a great camera and so much more fun to use because it works so much faster.
thanks for the time taken to make this comprehensive comparison!
very helpful...
No problem at all!!
This is the best comparicon video between 50 and 100 on RUclips👍
Thank you so much!
Great job man, so much information! Made my choise much easier. Thanks!! :)
You are very welcome
Super helpful when you are on the fence. thanks a lot.
Hopefully next year, I can add the gfx100s to my arsenal. That camera has always peaked my interest. Excellent video as always bro. I knew you would do the comparison video right. 🔥🔥
Thank you bro!! I think I’m going to save for one as well! It really was a joy to use!
get both. the 50meg sensor is a legend and the size is perfect. the phase detect on the 100s though is why you want this one as well. i will never ever sell our GFX anything. Having both won't do you wrong.
Its 00:00 in Poland .. and it is my birthday ... thanks! ❤❤❤
Aloha from Hawaii Marcus! Great comparison, I was looking forward to you doing a comparison for the 100 vs 50 megapixel cameras. I'm not gonna lie I totally wouldn't mind a 100 megapixel camera... but I don't even max out my skills with my 24 megapixel lol! BUT -- I really enjoyed the comparison, will have to go back and watch some of the segments again. I really like how you show in your videos the dynamic range w/the files/images. Honestly I never learned to expose properly for highlights... (I didn't own LR/PS - so I never edited photos and did much "recovery" of photos) ..always tried to get the subject exposed, ignored the rest (mistake!) watching your videos gave me insight, esp after some recent photos I took of family friends and trying to use Lightroom. I've seen some DR stuff from other youtubers on reviews...but don't know why maybe your delivery or lay out is why it stuck? - Just wanted to say thanks and share that!
Thank you for watching! Definitely a different workflow when shooting jpg. If I shoot jpg I always expose for subject but if shooting raw there is definitely a sweet spot for getting the most of of the image. It’s different from camera to camera as well, so it takes some time but you can get it pretty quickly!
Killer video, would love to see the same break down and i. Depth review with architecture and landscape.
i had the 100s for a while but i prefer the files of the 50s, switched back and i am happy. both are great cameras though.
I have gfx50s ii. and there is also a canon eos r6. is it worth selling them and buying gfx 100s?
Great review! I do architecture. Landscape and my personal family. So the 100S is best for me. Especially bc of 50mb pano files. The old 50S is actually better on a tripod with adjustable swiveling view finder. In really bright light the LCD is not useful.
Fun to see the magical lighting and intense images of your gorgeous models.
Very instructive to watch you deal with LR too!
Thank you so much!! Yes I totally agree, the 100s would be awesome to have the adjustable viewfinder. The 100s files are actually really nice in my opinion
@@SNAPAVELI In 100s you shot in standard/provia film simulation and in 50s ii you shot in Velvia !!! How the tone will be matched !!
One is in Boost mode ! And 50sii is not!!! What's the meaning of this comparison!???
Excellent video! I’m still undecided but this helps a lot. Thanks for sharing.
Thank you!! I think I’m going to upgrade this year
The files from the GFX 50 S2 are probably my favorite files coming from a digital camera ever. They have this certain something from the original first X100 just on steroids.
The 50 sensor is definitely incredible! One of my favorites!!
Thanks Marcus. Will have to wait for a different option. Don’t want to work with huge files but it would be almost imposible for me to work around the eye af or single point with the sII. Dream lens still 110f2. Just can’t justify buying into the whole combo due to af limitations and file size. Also looks like you prefer working with the r5 a lot better.
I totally understand. It’s still a slower placed system. The 100s feels much faster to me and I actually don’t think I missed many shots all day. But yes with the r5 I haven’t missed a shot in years now , it’s totally a workhorse. I’m still deciding if I need to upgrade to 100s since I’m usually only using one camera at a time anyway
This is the day .. I'm so excited. In next 4hrs I'll be getting my first GFX with 80/1.7 .. oh boy!!!!111 I know it is spam but I had to write this :)
That’s exciting!!! I hope you enjoy!!
I have been using a GFX 50s ii this week and noticed the grainy screen. I found that by turning off Natural Live View and going into the IQ settings and changing the Tone Curve Shadow value to the lowest value, -2, and changing the Film Simulation to either Eterna or Pro Neg Hi, the grainy screen is greatly reduced if not eliminated.
Thank you!! I’ll try that. Does it change the color of the screen a lot?
@@SNAPAVELI I think those simulations provide a very flat display, similar to what the raw file would look like. I expect the grainy screen will also be impacted by the amount of ambient light in every situation, but those settings did give me the best results. I believe author Rico Pfirstinger recommends the following settings, for Fujifilm cameras, to ensure the EVF/LCD show a display as close to the raw file as possible: Natural Live View = Off, Film Simulation = Eterna, Shadow Tone = -2, Highlight Tone = -2, Color = -4. NOTE: Setting Natural Live View = On is useful in high contrast scenes where you need to see more of the shadows during composition.
Superb work. Many thanks for your herculean efforts in running both cameras through their paces. Magenta is an issue in Fuji files. A big issue. The RAW output seems riddled with it and often its hard to get rid of it if you don't want it. Having had the old 50 before the 100 I will agree that the old sensor has even more of a magenta bias to its RAW output. Ive been playing with files from the Hasselblad x2D. They are radically different in colour rendition - you have to go hunting for anything in the purple- magenta range,
The spectral highlight handing seems to always look better on the 50S. I am not sure if that is due to the body or not as the composition is not 100% the same, but looks like a pattern from the images you showed.
I’m a full time professional commercial/editorial photographer and just recently purchased the 50s ii. The local store sent me both the 100 ii and the 50ii and I ended up keeping the 50sii and I shoot professionally every day! I found the 100sii files to be unnecessarily large and the comparison between the 2 files wasn’t enough to justify the price difference. Unless you do landscape/architecture the 50sii is perfect! I purchased 2 bodies to have a backup which I was able to do with the price difference. You have to use the right camera for your style and workflow. I don’t use high frame rate burst. I’m shoot slower and intentionally so medium format digital is perfect. The Pentax 645z and the Fuji gfx 50sii are now my everyday cameras!
thank you for your hard work
No problem at all! I’ll be back soon with more videos
@J.Marcus, amazing comparison, I watched this video a few times already. Did you use the 100s with 16bit color? I was thinking if the contrast difference in the raw files could be 16bit vs 14bit color depth.
Thank you! Yes I was in 16bit on the 100s, I really did like 100s files!
I think I'm going with 50SII. I like the files more. Megapixels aren't everything & the focus speed isn't that much faster on the 100S. 🤗
I’ve been doing fine with my 50sii , love the files! I’ve not had to worry about working so slow with the 100s. I’m really still on the fence
I only use AFS on my 50Sii, in fact that’s all I’ve ever used on any camera I’ve ever had, face detect isn’t for me. And I’ve found single shot, centre point focus and recompose is really fast, even in low light (30th f3.5 12800 iso).
Definitely single point!! Does the high iso ever bother you?
@@SNAPAVELI No, 12800 is great. Remember I live in England and from Oct-March it’s needs must.
Excellent video btw, thank you for your hard work.
@@chloescanlon1107 oh that makes sense!! Thank you so much!!
@@chloescanlon1107 wenn man immer schlechtes Wetter hat braucht man was wo die Sonne aufgeht das ist dann Ihre Kamera ;-) Viele Grüsse aus Germany
J, Can you do a comparison of the 80 F1.7 vs. 110 F2 but the 80 in 35mm crop mode. I would love to see how the 80 1.7 would look as a true 80mm. That could save many people some money. Get two focal lengths out of one lens. Thank you.
I’ll definitely try that out!!!
@@SNAPAVELI Thanks 🤗
I have the 50s ii and seriously seriously love ❤️ it
Yes it's slow but it's not unworkable
Thanks for the detailed comparison, I guess the most detailed comparison on the whole internet between those 2 cams. After almost 2 years with the 100S I can confidently say that the 50 (R/S) files have a great look to them which cannot be achieved with the 100. You can tweak all you want, you just don't get the character of the 50 series. Thanks for putting out high quality content
Only If someone could create a color profile for the 100s which is better with skintones..Would save enormous amounts of times with editing
Thank you so much!! I’m definitely going to work on making presets that match better but I don’t think it will ever be identical
@@SNAPAVELI Agreed thats why someone should make an Adobe Color Profile which you can load before you start working on the RAW, that way all the old preset may work better
Thank you for this very very thorough review. As I suspected GFX 100 even though faster, the difference isn't worth the cost. Best to shoot single point single shot and have your subject stay in place. Also I want to support you and purchase your course but it won't let me cause I live in Canada. If you've got a work around, let me know
Thank you!! Yes that exactly how I use my 50sii. Rapid af and single shot. I just wish the lcd processing was better. For some reason that really messes with my eyes. Sure I have an alternative checkout link for people outside of USA www.jmarcusphotographer.com/shop/online
@@SNAPAVELI thank you! Just purchased. Keep up the awesome videos.
@@TonyCaptures thank you so much! I’ll send the link this evening!
Nice comparison, thanks. So, if you had only 1 portrait lens, what would it be? I'm thinking of picking up the kit lens, and one solid portrait lens. Can't decide between the 80 or the 110mm.
Thank you! I actually bought the 80 hoping to sell it or the 110 after I picked but ended up keeping both. I really can’t decide. I have a comparison video that may help you FUJI GFX 110MM F2 VS 80MM 1.7 LENS - SHOOTOUT 🤯🤯 Raw Files for download!! GFX 100S - 50R Review
It is was my huge question - 80 vs 110. But after this video I'm getting 80 for full body and half body portraits outside studio. In few months for studio shots I will get 45-100. Thanks Marcus!
@@piotr.czechowski I don’t think you will be disappointed!!
I think it’s not even the camera. Models are always flicking their hair in front of their eye and don’t get me started on those outrageous eyelashes. Not sure if you are shooting under exposed which is how I shoot as well. Then other questions can you adjust screen brightness.
Jeez, you're so talented
I truly appreciate you!!
Cool thanks
45/2.8 on GFX100S works like it was different lens ... no jumping back and forward.. its is huge!
Yes it does! It’s the fastest lens I have I believe. Such an incredible piece of glass!
For C-AF did you have it set to focus or release priority? It might be okay if it's in focus priority
I’ll look and see for you! On the 50sii?
@@SNAPAVELI Thanks! Yeah it's a setting on all Fuji cameras I think so it would help on 100S also, focus priority will delay until the camera is happy with focus but release will just take it as fast as possible
Thank you! I had the 50S and needed to sell it to upgrade to the 100S and did not have time to compare files. At first, it felt that the 100S files had less dynamic range latitude to the 50S, which would stand to reason as the photosites are smaller), but your examples show that you can recover highlights and shadows pretty much just as well with both cameras.
I was worried about that too! But I think it’s incredibly close. I do think the 100s needs to be exposed properly/ a little different than the 50sii to get a very similar look , but it’s possible, just a bit different way to get there.
@@SNAPAVELI In 100s you shot in standard/provia film simulation and in 50s ii you shot in Velvia !!! How the tone will be matched !!
One is in Boost mode ! And 50sii is not!!! What's the meaning of this comparison!???
Thank you so much for this test man, perfection! I really appreciate how thorough you were with this. I have many thoughts but overall the deal breaker simply came down to auto focus. I can get very similar results from my Canon 5DS in live view using contrast based face detect compared to the 50Sii. The 100S was much better but then again, my A7R4 blows it out of the water in terms of AF. I really want to love these Fuji cameras, especially for the dynamic range but they need to start taking AF more seriously. These are big expensive cameras using great lenses but it's really a head scratcher as to why focusing(speed) is not a priority in the Fuji camp?
Because a true professional will not use 100 megapixel medium format in automatic mode. Only manual focus. Trusting automation to make a billboard is a big mistake. It's not just about accuracy, it's about the creative style of the photographer.
@@ArthurAbramovPhoto I don't recall any landscapes in this video? "Tue professionals" do use a 100mp camera everyday for subjects that are alive and moving, as shown here. Unless you're "creating" a Van Gogh, attempting to use manual focus in this scenario would in fact be a "big mistake."
I’m really not sure what is holding up faster af tracking. I think they are at the mercy of sensor manufacturers for phase detect sensors and possibly trying to keep it affordable by not using an incredibly fast processor? Or maybe that tech isn’t there yet. I do think the 100s was usable for most scenarios outside of full on fashion runway speed
@@SNAPAVELI In 100s you shot in standard/provia film simulation and in 50s ii you shot in Velvia !!! How the tone will be matched !!
One is in Boost mode ! And 50sii is not!!! What's the meaning of this comparison!???
@@DanceDeepDas that only applies to jpgs the raw files import with no film sim. The boost mode on the 100s was set to viewfinder resolution, it only affects battery life. 50sii has no boost mode for viewfinder
Hey I Down loaded the DNG files from your test shoot with the Fuji GFX 100s and OMG!! that GFX 100s image detail or mi d blowing
Yes! It’s really simply incredible!
Thanks Marcus
I use my 50Sii like a digital GA645... big 'ole point and shoot at 50 megapixels. I tried the 100ii... it's *a lot less forgiving* to poor technique because you've got so many pixels to fill.
I did notice that! Your shutter speed has to be a lot higher to not get shake as well, even with the ibis
Oh I just remembered.
I’m thinking with the Fuji GFX 100s I would get the FUJIFILM GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Lens I do mostly studio photography portrait.
What do think about it?
I’ve never tried the zooms, I’ve tried the 45, 63, 80 & 110. All superb , 80 & 45 might be my fav
@@SNAPAVELI I believe you my friend
What was your experience with the GFX 100s when you upload all the 100megapixel to your Mac?
Lol slow. It’s doable on a new Mac with big hd and ram. Also depends on how many images you shoot. The files are around 150mb if I remember correctly
@@SNAPAVELI that’s what I experienced when I downloaded the file you have kindly provided to us. It toke 20 seconds to upload to my MacBook Pro.
How ever once I got it up Adobe raw with its extraordinary adjustment sliders it lag just a bit-but never the less I able to bring up the shadows and highlights-now that was mind blowing and the detail from 200 to 300 was stunning. I was able to see a few bumps on her face on her forehead with no pixelated infects..And that was at a good distance.
That GFX 100s is a beast.
Been seeing the 50Sii pop up here and there, USED...for like $2500 - $2900. Been thinking about it...
They are at the lowest they have been! Great camera
Thanks for this! While (as a 50S II owner) I'm not in the market for another GFX body, I am in the market for one of the two lenses you used in this video. The 80mm f/1.7 has been the frontrunner -- since it is a bit smaller and thus I feel I'd be compelled to use it more. (Perhaps I am overstating the size difference?). However, the 110 f/2 is on sale right now, reduced to the 80's price. Of the two, which would you buy first if you didn't have either?
I have gfx50s ii. and there is also a canon eos r6. is it worth selling them and buying gfx 100s?
I would say no, you will need that r6 when you need fast af. The 100ii is better choice for this but expensive. I have a comparison on that one next week
@@SNAPAVELI Thank you for your answer. I am waiting for you with excitement. I am watching you from Turkey. Greetings.
why did you not do the same lens on both
I did , a few times. If the slowest lens on the 100s is usable then you know the 110 is as well
Your model makes me forgot this is about the cameras 😉
My friend I downloaded your sample images and they’re all gorgeous beautiful thank you man.
Can I ask you a favor please?
Can you take portrait pictures with a canvas backdrop like portrait pictures?
please I want to buy the Fuji GFX 100s but I want to see Portrait taking indoor studio flash with a canvas backdrop, or something I’d like?
Thank you so much!! I would but I don’t currently own the 100s , it was on loan for that video. I have the 50sii
@@SNAPAVELI okay. That would work.
If u would tweak all ur presets to work specifically for the GFx 100 I’d buy them ✨
I’m definitely reworking a gfx set specifically for the 100s!
@@SNAPAVELIare these out yet?
If you're a portrait wedding shooter ...get the 100s
Landscapes or products
..studio shooter ...get the 50s ii
Just landscapes 50sii
Only Fujifilm, I think this is a best camera for street photography, what do you say.
I may thinking of purchasing it in the future! But not sure, because for me it is costlier also;
but only Fujifilm, Fujifilm, and Fujifilm, why, is this the best camera for street photography. Reply please.
That’s tough to answer! I’d say the 100s with phase detect would be my choice out of the 2 for that. But if you need action style street shots , probably best to go for a crop fuji
@@SNAPAVELI thankyou for the information.
For middle aged people who cannot walk fast in the street, for street photography which of the two lens would be best; which lens would you suggest : 18 - 55 or 70 - 300 mm DX VR
Please suggest.
@@ashok5591 are they medium format lenses?
@@SNAPAVELI yes
@@ashok5591 I’d say the longer zoom. If you can’t move really fast that will have you some range!
how are you recording what's going on inside the camera?
Atomos ninja v
@@SNAPAVELI cool i have one of those, sweet deal thanks man. guess i gotta figure out which wire to snag. do you just have a long tether that way you don't have it mounted on the gfx and can set it down somewhere nearby?
@@Biketherapy113 that’s always the problem, it gets cumbersome, you can find a used ninja star , it’s really small and no screen. It works well with gfx since the gfx won’t turn the lcd off when you plug an hdmi device in. That’s the one I like to use most on gfx. I use ninja v on my r5 since canon cuts the lcd off when you plug in hdmi.
@@SNAPAVELI yeah thats what i got the ninja on too is an r5 haha. Thanks for the info man i appreciate it.
@@SNAPAVELI is that ninja star pretty forgiving on battery life since it doesn't have a screen?
Thanks for intensive review--- so... are you going to upgrade? haha
Thank you!! Lol well I’m definitely thinking about it. My 50sii seems very slow now. I knew there was a possibility I could get hooked.
I downloaded your raw files and messed with them in Capture One. I think the color differences you are seeing are caused by Adobe because the raw files from the 100S and 50Sii look almost identical in Capture One. If you do use Capture One though don't convert the files to .dng because then you can't use the Fuji film simulations, you have to use the default capture one profiles.
Thank you! Yes I’m going to try capture one soon! I’m excited to see what they look like.
@@SNAPAVELI You will be hooked! I took me about 5 shoots to switch and get comfortable. For those shoots I pulled the files into both and did my best editing and compared the results. I was always disgusted by the results from Lightroom after seeing the C1 edits. With the Fuji files I'm starting at them now and the colors seem exactly the same to me. Everything matches, even the contrast seems much closer.
@@NickDelDuca have you tried the software to import Lightroom presets?
@@SNAPAVELI I saw that from Googling but I didn't end up buying it. I really wanted to import your presets into C1 😆I ended up just making my own presets that I've been using. That seems like a good video though! Maybe the company that makes the software would sponsor a video if you reached out to them?
@@NickDelDuca awesome! I’ll see what they say!
whats the models instagram ?
is 50 sii 14 bit raw or 16 bit ?
All the 50 series are 14bit.
THANKS @@SNAPAVELI
may I ask, so what is the advantage of 50 SII over CANON R5 with 50 1.2 lens@@SNAPAVELI expect speed? I know r5 have faster AF, I wonder which one is more better for color?
@@suatsekil pretty much what you said. Speed for when you can’t miss a moment. Colors are definitely better on gfx and dynamic range as well
Another person that should have 20 times the subs. Algorithm fail!
I really appreciate that! I don’t post enough for the algorithm I guess
Super Video genau so etwas habe ich gesucht. Danke Für Deine Tolle Arbeit. Abo ist gemacht und viele Grüße aus Berlin - Deutschland.
Thank you for subscribing! I’m glad I could help you!!
GF80 F1.7 is slow for focus, so it is not good to go for a focus speed comparIson in this video. GFX100S must be good as prices. 😂😉😊😊
no 4k video? ;(
I did upload it in 4k, perhaps it’s not processed the 4k yet.
Thanks, will try later.
4k ready :)
@@piotr.czechowski awesome!!
I promise you I'm not here for the camera.
Lightroom is not best idea for Fuji ...
I’ve heard that before. I’m going to try capture one out soon
Why would you say that? You can get exactly same results from C1 and LR - just road to final image is a bit different :)
@@piotr.czechowski Absolutely not. Lightroom does nasty things to files and has way less tools to manipulate the image. You might be able to pull off a similar look to C1 in photoshop but you would have to be very versed in all of the color manipulation tools and spend a lot of time. Not a chance matching a good stylized C1 edit in Lightroom. It's just way less flexible.
This should only apply to X-Trans sensors.... GFX is bayer?