Видео

Marcus bro do you recommend the 200 f2?

All I conclude from this video is the AF is just hopeless in the GFX.I don't have the latest but only the GFX50S II, and can't tell enough how painful that camera is when I need some reliable perfect focus image ( i made it sounded like I am the only one want a perfect focus image, LOL), for that reason, I go back to my " inferior sensor" Z9 with 85 1.2 S and 135 F1.8 Plena.

Oh wow, at her on GFX its like 3D girl and colours much more pleasing on GFZ than Canon tbh there is no comparison AFis not everything

Excellent information. So which will be the best combination as per you? 85mm 1.2 of course , if I go for 50 mm 1.2 along with 85 mm 1.2 completely ditching 28 70 is that will be a good decision as per you?

Thanks Marcus, this comparison is very informative. Thanks for taking the time to deep dive in the systems. I own the 50s ii and seriously considering the 100s ii. Have you tried it vs the 50s ii? are the files “still harder to edit” than the 50?

I would hate to buy the RF 28-70mm and then Canon comes out with a second version with better optics and lens coatings for flaring. Cheers!

Man, your style is amazing

Great take👌... btw New to your channel.... definitely earned yourself a new subscriber...

The nikon 200mm f2 vr is still my dream lens for my D850. Both vr 1 or vr 2. The vr 2 handles the flare a little better because of the extra coating but my style is not to shoot towards the sun anyways. The Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 sports (2018 version) comes a little close especially with sharpness, (MTF chart 4000+) and the (almost)lack of focal shrinking/breathing close or at 200mm. But F2 at 200mm gets results no lens can get to, with full and fast autofocus. Carl Zeiss lenses are also good but they don't have autofocus.

Marcus, thank you very much, very useful

hello there, ....nice review about how Canon EOS R can HOLD UP!!! ..... but i cant download Lightroom Presets.....again ....thanks.

Im about to buy this lens

Was seriously looking at a new 50sii but this video has completely sold me on a pre owned 100s

Can you rent a laser cube?

I want thank you for your great work. But using vpn I can't connect with my bank card. Do you have alipay or wechat pay ？😂 ❤ from China

The color so different ？ Can't believe. Thank for your great view. Are they edited in the same way or the same preset ？

I would like to say I always enjoy your videos/reviews. The samples you provide are always appreciated as well. I noticed in the Canon ef 85mm f1.2 that the eyes were not in focus/focus missed. I don't know if that is an issue with the Eos R but on my Sony a7r3 it usually doesn't miss focus on the eyes when using an af adapter.

Great informative video. Seems like I will look for a wider alternative to the 80 for boudoir and such and make the 110 my beauty lens

Excellent video. Very well explained. Good comparisons, they seem honest to me. Hey, there you have the Z8 and the z7iii comes, with excellent focus, so you no longer miss Nikon's raw

You're actually kinda nitpicking while pixel peeping. Throw a LUT on and be done with it.

👍👍👍

What shutter speed to capture the beams. Just got my laser cube. Also have you tried using it with strobes?

The 200 is perfect.

Very good and thorough comparison I must say the Canon R5 is just a beautiful camera. I had it and because of RUclips and all these reviews of the Sony cameras I changed to Sony. And then Iwas so disappointed because of the very poor autofocus performance. I’m so surprised that no one on RUclips talks about this big problem (in forums they do…), it always hit on the eyebrows or on the eyelashes and the iris was always unsharp ( I want perfect performance like the canon’s and no post production faked sharpening…) I talked to many people from Sony at events and even send it in for repair but in private they told me the camera just can’t do it better. And I should change back to Canon which I did now having the Canon R8 and even with 24 megapixels I am so happy with the camera I just missed the IBIS but that’s fine because the camera is very small. Now I ordered the Fuji 100 s Mark two and I will try it out and keep the Canon system for sure at the same time. Thanks for your content definitely followed you :)

Of these two lenses I pick a Plena or Samyang 135mm 1.8. They're smaller, costs less, gets the job done, sharpness is perfect wide open. If I had 200mm, I'd propably use it a lot, but with a monopod.

Amazing work!!!

Dear Marcus, in case I have RF 70-200 f2.8, should I get 85 f1.2 or 50 f1.2 as prime for portraits. Please help

I am 2 minutes away

J, Thanks so much for this video. I have watched it a number of times and as a result bought a copy of the Nikon 105. Q. would you use this lens on a GFX 100s ? Thanks again for your video.

You really should try more Sony and Nikon cameras. Imo they are better than canon now with each brands most recent generations. The a7rv separates tones much nicer than the canon r5

Bro thank you. Literally what i needed to know about it because i want to start recording my evf for teaching and videos. No frills and straight to the point. Subscribed

Have you tried dji’s auto focus system with the gfx 100ii?

Awesome video man. Love your videos.

I’m a full time professional commercial/editorial photographer and just recently purchased the 50s ii. The local store sent me both the 100 ii and the 50ii and I ended up keeping the 50sii and I shoot professionally every day! I found the 100sii files to be unnecessarily large and the comparison between the 2 files wasn’t enough to justify the price difference. Unless you do landscape/architecture the 50sii is perfect! I purchased 2 bodies to have a backup which I was able to do with the price difference. You have to use the right camera for your style and workflow. I don’t use high frame rate burst. I’m shoot slower and intentionally so medium format digital is perfect. The Pentax 645z and the Fuji gfx 50sii are now my everyday cameras!

Not apples to apples though. Same pose and light would tell more. I own rf 28-70 and the rf85 1.2 . And could take either one to any job

I run dual Camera with the 28-70 f2 and the 85 1.2, its a great combo

Thanks For This, I left my filter on my way to a music video shoot and this is saving my edit lol

is the best i love the color from this camera

Thank you for your videos. I discovered your channel recently. It would be very nice if you could compare other types of sensors (like gfx to fuji apsc like xh2 s or not). Sony to canon/nikon also would be awesome. Thanks again gor your wonderfull work.

Thank you for the videos and files, a great help in deciding if i want to give the (now pricewise very interesting) GF100S a shot for slower paced work alongside my Canon cameras. The ISO performance and ability to extremely push dark files/shadows without the files breaking apart is awesome. the resolution difference between the R5 and 100s is interestingly much lower than i had anticipated, i am sure its different for stopped down landscape work but wide open the RF lenses are so extremely sharp that the Fuji lenses do not compete. i would even say the R5 files have more usable resolution than the GF100s with the 80 1.7. despite having less than half the megapixels. the 110 2 looks quite a bit better but still...not so much in between as i would have thought.

You just keep saying Canon sharper, Canon sharper.... :) so funny. Tamron is clearly better than you show here... I'm using the lens as my main .... Its a super sharp lens. I'm not sure if you have a bad copy there, or just bad intentions. :) Peace!

Can the canon ef 50mm 1.2 be used for your the technique in your course? Or should I get the sigma 50mm 1.4 art instead as you recommend? The rf 50mm is too cost prohibitive and I have no 50mm's so I will need to buy one. I only have tamron 35mm 1.8 and 85mm 1.8 and 135mm f2. Thanks!

Great video and images. I have a Z8 and this is the only F mount lens that I still run. I don't think I'll ever get rid of it.

Cool thanks

To be fair, 28-70 is not trying to replace the 85 f1.2, that be the job for 70-200 f/2.8. Sadly, since I HAVE to have the 70-200 for shooting sports, and I am not a pro who makes money of off photography, I will probably never be able to justify getting the 85.

I find 105 mm too long, taking more casual portraits. Want to get closer and have more environemnt in it.

An AF test with an LM lens would be more meaningful-something like the 45-100. GFX system uses a lot of DC drive lenses and just like their APS-C lenses they aren’t great for moving subjects. So frankly the results tell me two things: Fuji needs to release faster glass and 2) maybe the 100 iii or iv will be the one fast enough for more dynamic shots. The new body seems like a huge jump forward but I don’t think the 55 is a fast lens.

Mindy is one of most beautiful ladies I’ve ever seen. Inside and Out. Thanks Mindy for making an old man feel good about the world. 😊Beautiful Work Marcus .

Another person that should have 20 times the subs. Algorithm fail!

There is no way in hell the 28-70 replaces any "L" primes. The bokeh and subject separation is not even close. I've used all of those. 28-70 may replace the cheaper primes (the 1.8s)if that is what people mean. But it's not at all in the league of of the "L" primes in the overall "look." The only time I would use that lens is for a wedding, where you don't want to be changing lenses on the go. Other than that, it's heavy, expensive and overrated.