The Good Dinosaur Trailer Accuracies & Inaccuracies
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- The Good Dinosaur Trailer looks amazing! Today I’d like to give my thoughts and opinions on the film, as well as point out the accuracies and inaccuracies! All done in a Cinema Sins style format. Hope you enjoy!
All copyrighted images belong to their respected owners:
Original The Good Dinosaur Trailer: • The Good Dinosaur - Of...
Special Thanks to: Your Dinosaurs are Wrong for the Diagrams of Accurate dinos: • Pteranodon: Your Dinos... and • Parasaurolophus: Your ...
9:32 David Peter's Pterosaur hand diagram (pterosaurheres...)
Background song: Hoedown by Don't Starve
Ending song: Wirt's Anthem, preformed by Patrick Mchale (no copyright infringement intended, only used as a teaser for my commentary for the next video)
This video is protected under FAIR USE for reasons of Commentary, Education, Criticism, Parody, and Social Satire.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Educational use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
This means, copyrighted images can be displayed, even without the owner’s permission. If I neglected to give the copyright owners credit, please inform me and I will give you the appropriate credit.
All video/game/image/music content is recorded and edited under fair use rights for reasons of commentary and social satire.
fairuse.stanfor...
www.copyright.g...
ask.metafilter....
There's an inaccuracy you missed at the beginning. Asteroids aren't that close together. They are thousands of miles apart, yes, even in asteroid belts. It would take forever for one to even be close to *touching* another asteroid.
Well all asteroids were massive themself as well,
@@zedantXiang That doesn't justify anything.
@@samalass466 still not too inacurated since they are actually kilometers apart.
@@zedantXiang What are you talking about? I agree with the the poster of the comment, not you who replied to it.
@@samalass466??
I'm honestly disgusted by those people saying "but it's for kiiiiiidzzz". Not only it is implying that children are dumb with no
standards or sense of criticism, but it's also a very LAZY excuse. It's possible and EASY to make dinosaurs look cartoony and interesting while still being accurate, stop using children as an excuse for outdated designs.
yep i agree
Children ARE dumb, and they have absolutely NO standards
You idiot
I have a son who actually knows Dino inaccuracies
If it's for kids it is even more inportant to make it acurate. 1. They are learning, don't start them of on inaccuracies. 2. They don't have any previous nostalgia for the old outdated designs, so why use them? 3. They will love any dinosaurs. "For kids" is not a good argument!
The good dinosaur made me so sad
Because during the whole movie I was in awe at the environmental animation, it was so BEAUTIFUL
But the dinosaurs were so meh...
I stand by my thoughts that Disney just wanted to make toys, but Pixar really wanted to make a pretty dinosaur movie but were denied because capitalism
Felt similarly about WALL-E; the environments looked great, the robots look cute... and then there's the human design.
Panthera dnk, after all the humans were secondary to Walle ‘s story and I kind of get the design, meanwhile in The good dinosaur the dinosaurs were the main focus and they didn’t look like they belonged in that world
.
.
I even think Dinosaur (2000) was better
I rather liked the t-rexes... They were the least meh... But yeah... They were pretty plain, especially given that the environments were so photorealistic.
@@darkdeifan are you hate the good dinosaurs i also hate the good dinosaur
“I’m so hyped up for the Good Dinosaur!”
Disney/Pixar: **nervous laughter** 👉👈
Nice profile pic.
Dude the Super Mario Brothers movie is clearly the superior "what if the mass extinction didn't happen" film
Herohammer Studios that's how u get Yoshi the dinosaur
That's exactly what I came here for.
oh.yoshi.birdo,bowser,Toad?,bigger turtles.
No it's clearly the emoji movie
😂
"Holy crap the good dinosaur lools amazing"
So that was a fricking lie.
True
It’s great visually but sucks story wise
The reason the ark “triceratops” is so Inaccurate is because in the canon, it is a genetically modified blend of different Ceratopsians. In the game it is referred to as a “Trike” for this reason.
goddamn, rockwell really got bored
it was not rockwell
Pretty good
@@colk5373, Rockwell was one of the survivors put into the ark
Yeah, ark's triceratops is a subspecies of the real world one
Imagine him just pointing out the inaccuracies of jurassic park...
Hey guess what!
@@thespinodino ok
He’s done this
Like some animals aren’t even from the Jurassic.
@@felixargyle-6364 *most
You were very excited-
But it sadly turned out to be one of the most criticized movies they have made. wELP-
Quarter Wolf well for recent history they have many films even more criticized then this one.
But it did do pretty bad
Justin Spencer
True. True.
"Please give me a movie with a fuzzy t-rex!"
If I could I'd give ya a dozen
Two words: hell no
@@christopherjordan6235 two words: hell yes
honestly wouldn't kids love a dinosaur thats fluffy and powerful at the same time it's like a dog but better. Cmon some one make a fluffy t rex cartooon
I will keep finding you
are you a happ now?
You found nothing wrong with the asteroids bumbing into each other and being catapulted towards earth?
He's not a space enthusiast
@@berserker3414 Actually he is. He has said so in at least one of his videos.
@@satya4234 Even so it's not the focus of the video. It's about dinosaurs, not the astroid hitting Earth to wipe out the dinosaurs.
We never know that those collapsed or not. It isn't possible to know if the asteroid collapesed
satish chandra sinha huh?
Dinosaurs and other creatures: *dies*
Cockroaches, other insects and small mammals: *Crab Rave*
lol
cockroaches are just god tier, I'm terrified of them but they are god tier survivors
those mfs can survive a fucking nuke
@@Dr._Heinz_Doofenshmirtz They can survive the radiation, not the blast.
7:30 - i'm guessing some east asians uncovered fossils like this, and that's where their idea of dragons comes from
Yeah thats actually a very good "idea" (idk the word for it)
@@angus6678 speculation?
Theory
I personally think that quite a lot of mythological cryptids were at least in part inspired by either fossils or genetic deformities (for example, werewolves from the deformity that causes you to grow thick hair all over your body or vampires from the deformity that causes sensitivity to light and reduced gum lines.)
hypothesis
"66 millions of years ago"
It should be like 65 million years ago
Execute order 66
asteroid: yes sir right away:
🌎☄
Three more and I would make a joke
66 likes
Noyce
@@MrArora-gd7zh ruined it not me btw
Actually in a movie called dinosaur island, your fuzzy T rex exists!
Make this popular so he can watch dinosaur island(i watched the movie too)
Its great
Tyrantlizardking Rex Sadly the CGI is worse than Star Wars III
Tyrantlizardking Rex thank u
Just a shame that they made it look terrible.
Guys...
BIRDS
AREN'T
REAL
._.
OH SHIT I HAVE THREE ALIENS IN MY HOUSE AAHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH
I mean trees aren't real either so I mean yeah you're right
Eh?
@TheSupremeKingBowser Cupa:いいね he means the creatures with feathers a beak tweeting in my yard in the morning, those things. They don't actually exist
You should have also mentioned that arlo, the apatosaurus, would already have been a fossil before the kt extinction. Instead, he should have been named alramosaurus, which did live at the same time as T Rex and would have been more of interest, as it was a titanosaur.
What is the correct name?
And another thing for an inaccuracy he missed, long necks can not run like how arlo due to their massive weight, they try to but can only pick up a tiny bit of speed by walking
And plus, true, it should arlo should be called a allosaurus, because apatosaurus died 150,000,000 years ago
@@calebsundquist2672 listen
this movie is just for fun
allosaurus existed with apatosaurus
this does not need to be accurate
caunt we just have retrosaur films ofor fuck sike
&Allison Worf-Anderson oh, so you mean teach all the kids inaccurate information and false facts just so they can have a harder time grasping onto the truth in the future?
@@luckyblockyoshi there is nothing wrong with retrosaurs
Let's be honest, who doesn't want a fluffy T-rex?
+Sir Richard Owen I would name mine Chili, because why not.
Ditto I'd name my T.rex fluffy!
Do you mean Flauphy?
hue hue.
I don't
lools at raptors in The Good Dinosaur:
WHAT ARE THOSE
*looks
+Mari-Liis Mihhailov Precisely. Why is it that, in a world where even the sauropods are smart enough to create BUILDINGS, why are the raptors the dumbest of all the talking dinos? Why not some sort of culture similar to the Warrior clans in the Erin Hunter novels? Some sort of tribe with a camp and a hierarchy? And if the Apatosaurus' silo is anything to go by, the structures would probably be stone!
Heck, maybe I'm right, and these raptors are just the crackheads that got kicked out.
Yeah in real life if A SAUROPOD is smart then raptors thould be smarter than Einstein
Mari-Liis Mihhailov My point exactly. It would have, in my opinion, made the film much more interesting. Eh, maybe they'll save it for the sequel.
Hey while they're at it, why don't they make whatever those crackhead raptors were smoking the reason they've got so few feathers! Humans lose hair when they're addicted to some drugs, why can't the same be true for the raptors?
+Dragonstar Hmmm where would they get crack tho? Maybe they found weed. Or Aphatosauri gave them crack so they would not be so dangeeous
"I'm not gonna nitpick about stuff like teeth"
30 seconds later: "STOP GIVING THESE BIRDS TEETH!"
jared Blood It was not what he meant. At least apatosaurus had teeth innreqlmlife.
pterosaurs aren't birds
I really wish science textbooks showed accurate dinosaurs and gave updated information.
+Austin Langreder Agreed. I honestly think that is a way bigger problem than any cartoon.
+mjangelvortex Well the issue with that is explained in the video. While we do know T-Rex had feathers (along with other dinos), we don't know exactly the type. Some could look like chickens with their feathers while on the other hand they could just be really fuzzy with large feathers in small areas.
@@EvanRado h no fun man
@@EvanRado, Artistic interpretation/liberties of the feathers is better than no feathers.
I want to see truly accurate dinosaurs!
domsau2 you're not the only one, buddy.
Same
Yup
Im Taking Animation Classes.. (When Im In 12 Grade) And Then I Will Make That!!
@@LarsTonguesInAspix make your youtube name proud, dude! Good luck and have fun! 💪🏻
I hate that people are bringing up the "it's a kids movie" excuse.
Just because they're kids doesn't mean they should be given moronic entertainment! I grew up watching renaissance era Disney and Don Bluth movies that didn't hold a kids' hand or have them share the same "friends/family are your strength!" or "sharing is caring!"; I had nightmares from that damn owl scene from The Secret of NIMH and was really confused why Quasimodo didn't get Esmeralda in the end because good guys are supposed to get the girls in the end, right?
But they taught very important lessons: a mother will do ANYTHING to save their child and not everything will end up a happy ending (and I'm massively kinkshaming Frolo, jesus) respectfully.
Now I really enjoy the creativity and some of the really deep shit some animations are willing to dive into (the first few minutes of Up, racism in One Piece, how Katara had to be forced into using taboo Bloodbending to save her friends)-same goes for any form of entertainment-but you need to look for awhile to find that kind of stuff.
Which is why I have an arsenal of good shows and movies to show to my niece/nephews when they're older.
Also, awesome channel; I LOVE paleontology and enjoy the hell out of the cryptid vids -even though I enjoy the lore out of artistic expression- you should really check out the Hopkinsville Goblin or Bray Road Beast cases!
Agreed, and there is some movies of "Magical beasts" that are more "accurate" than it.
Jessica Ustas wow does reading this count as reading a book?
Fambine Bombazzo Disney's. dinosaur ._.
Jessica Ustas does it look like some children would even understand 50% of this?
kids understand a lot when it comes to things they're interested in. like, you know, dinosaurs.
3:31 brother, may I have some oats?
I was on the internet once and I found an idiot that said "U Guys Do No That Dinosuars Aint Real, Rite?"
WiresTheRoboWolf Wow.
faith is lost in humanity.
Wow that guy is dumb as f
Nah, he has a point
@@5foot5inches98 heh
Okay, you know what bothers me the MOST about The Good Dinosaur? When it comes out, NO ONE in the paleo community will bat an eye on how crappy of a job Pixar did with their research, and will just dismiss it as "cartoony". Meanwhile, Jurassic World, which was a SEQUEL to a movie from 1993, and WANTED to keep the designs consistent BECAUSE its a sequel, gets all the hate even though the dinosaurs in that movie are MUCH more accurate than the ones in this one! No.... no I didn't say they are accurate, I said MORE accurate. Pteranodons without teeth, none of the dinos drag their tails on the ground, and the apatosaurs don't have broken knees (Arlo's front legs are bent like those of a horse while having the feet of an elephant, it's really distracting once you notice it.)
And this is where the problem lies. The Good Dinosaur is a new IP. It's a fresh, new idea that didn't have any movie pre-dating it, this was the first REAL chance for us to get a dinosaur movie that was both GOOD and ACCURATE. Why is it so hard for film makers nowadays to put both of these into a dinosaur movie? We get inaccurate movies like Jurassic World and this, but are at least entertaining. Or we get movies like Walking with Dinosaurs 3D, which are so painful to sit through. I'm going to see it anyway, but the fact that the dinosaurs and other animals are outdated by over 50 years is NOT going to make it one of my favorite Pixar films...
+scorpiopede Finally someone else who realizes JW is a direct continuation of Jurassic Park, and of course they always skip over the fact that these "theme park monsters" aren't real dinosaurs, so even then the inaccuracies make sense
What people don't understand is that the DNA of the dinosaurs in Jurassic park aren't completely Dino, they literally say they alter the dinosaurs genetic composition and alter the physical appearance to make them more scary and interesting
Rick W With frog DNA.
@Rick W: The first movie portrayed it more like they were going for accuracy when it came to the dinos. And for the most part, I think the movie creators actually were. At the time it was the most modern depiction of dinosaurs on the screen. There was nothing like it in pop culture. But since then a lot of stuff happened in our understanding of dinosaurs.
When Jurassic World came to the scene it had a bit of an issue. Either go with the inaccurate early 90's depiction of dinos. Or go with a more updated look. They decided to go with the older look. And if I was in their situation I would likely do so too. Though I actually would be mixed it up a bit and have it be clear that the dinos the park presented were not proper dinos but a creation of genetic engineering for entertainment purposes.
I may not have paid much attention when I saw the movie however so I am not sure how well they conveyed that the dinosaurs were a man-made creation and not copies of past creatures. I mean I would likely have as a writer make this as a central theme of the movie where one discusses if it right of Man to exploit nature in this way. What role do we have now that we can actually start tailoring life with technology like CRISPR. Technology that was not even around back when the original movie was made. (Also I would present a dilemma rather than a solution in the movie. We do not need a morality tale about how boo hoo, genetic engineering is wrong. I find good sci-fi more present you with interesting ideas then try to give you a solution. Because in most case there are no easy solutions)
To have a few more accurate looking dinosaurs in the movie to contrast with the fake monster would have been nice.
As I understand part of this was actually what the movie was going for. But the movie lacked to grab my attention so I may have missed those parts. Which is too bad if that is the case. To be honest the thing that sticks with me the most from that movie was the nostalgia bits. Though come to think of it. The Raptors the main protagonist controlled for parts of the movie actually shows a bit of the dualism of Mans ability to control nature can be used both for good and for bad. Maybe they actually did make the movie I would. Just that I did not notice it...
I may have to rewatch the whole thing now...
Studio Ghibli can save us!
Actually, I saw a documentary exploring the possibility of humans existing alongside dinosaurs in an alternate reality where the KT extinction never happened. They explored the idea where, since trees were evolving fruit, that small mammals could have evolved to climb the trees in order to eat them. This would lead to small primate-like mammals that could eventually lead to a much smaller and tree-dwelling humanoid species. So basically awesome dinosaur-hunting monkey-people.
You mean tree climbing hobbits or the ewoks (from star war)
+Karn Phutanate you............................ You sir have just made my day
I wish that actually happened
I need this link!
+SnowScales That's not how choas theory. Even if this occurred, it would almost certainly end up looking vastly different form any species of ape from our world, because of how mutations work.
This is like Cinema sins but about scientific accuracy
so sad that people can't realize that dinosaurs had feathers
I think some trex's had feathers and some didn't it's a stupid theory but it could be ture.
+Mike 1738 It's not stupid, it's actually very accurate, if the little guys had feathers, why can't the big guys have it too? Yutyrannus was 3m tall and had 9m in length had them, that means the others very likely did too, and what do you mean some T-Rexes had it and some didn't? They're the same specie, so they must have the same traits, unless they are born deformed and ugly and are problably going to die, and since the rexes are...y'know, they are all tyrannosaurs, it's the same thing as saying one bird specie has scales and the others don't, and birds are in the same family as dinosaurs which should be pretty obvious if you give a single shit to the topic.
yutyrannus isnt much smaller than a t rex if you double yutyrannus' size you get a carnivore bigger than t rex as yutyrannus is 3 meters tall and 9 meters long t rex is 4 meters tall and 13 meters long double 3 is 6 and double 9 is 18 so yeah yutyrannus isnt much smaller than t rex
lol you arent taking in consideration the weight, thats a key factor, yutyrannus is less than 1 ton, t rex is up for 5 to even 9 tons, t rex is waaaaaaaaaay bigger
+Nicolas Ahumada And how can size influence on the amount of feathers an animal has? Explain, and don't use Sauropods as an example cause they are technically their own thing. +ThomastheYutyrannus King I didn't mention names, therefore I never said Yutyrannus was smaller.
One more INACCURACY I see:T-Rex's and Aptosaurus didn't live in the same time (right?)
true
Apatosaurus lived during the Jurassic while raptors, rexes, trikes and pteranodon lived during the cretatious
You're right except for pteranodon, there were many species of pterosaurs living in the Jurassic period.
That is true, but Pteranodon lived during the Cretaceous.
apatosaurus and diplodocus both lived in the Jurassic
I'd love to see you do more of these kinds of videos where you analyze dinosaur movies and keep track of accuracies and inaccuracies. Ever think you'd do more like this?
I plan on doing one on the Walking with series
TREY the Explainer i thought you'd do the walking with dinosaurs movie, i don't honestly care as long as you keep doing them, i enjoy these vids too
HoopsAndDinoMan what the what
yeah when it said it killed every dinosaur on earth i fell out of my chair and crawled all the way to the other side of the room screaming oh god what have they done
Could you do one on ice age? I wanna see you tear those films apart
I don’t know why, but I really just love the shape of the female Rex’s snout in this movie. It’s so satisfying and elegant while still looking powerful m
well in ny opinion disney's Dinosaurs 2001 looks way better
Uncanny valley.
+mrplcoleYeah I agree those looked really weird and a little creepy
+Godzilla 1984 Interesting. Simply because they're more realistic? realistic proportions aside (the cartoonishness in THIS film is meant to suggest they've evolved), do you really think the rendering quality and lighting is more believable in Dinosaurs? Haha not trying to pick a fight, but as an animator i'm always interested in discussing it.
Karagianis It's just pixar's art style.
Karagianis Cartoon proportions have nothing to do with scientific accuracy...
Keep in mind that this takes place millions of years after the missed asteroid (Hence humans "evolving"), so that the dinosaurs could have evolved into new species. Just a theory, though. The feathers are still innacurate.
+Jasper Jennings Agreed
Humans still would not have evolved because of the fact that the dinosaurs never were wiped out. The dinosaurs would have advances but continued to fit in their niches so there would be next to no evolution in mammals even after such a long time.
I'm saying that this inaccurate situation where humans evolved proves that time has passed. I am not saying that this alternate universe is accurate.
+Jasper Jennings k
***** i just personally dont see how it would take place. The only reason that new species rise is because of needs to fill ecological niches and i dont see what nice mammals would grow into in a world where dinosaurs fill almost every terrestrial niche thst would be more than just small rat like and opposum creatures. Anything larger such as say bovines would just be an easy target to hunt and go extinct, maybe wolves and other canids would survive but never in large numbers. I dont see how or why primates would evolve unless it was to be just tree living small creatures such as lemurs or orangutans. Ground apes like gorillas and technically humans would not last long in a world full of larger, faster and just over all better equipped species to compete with
The highly inaccurate one from ark survival is actually a different species of triceratops which has been made up
To be honest the fact that every single species in ARK is a made up relative was quite a smart justification for the inaccuracy.
I have been playing ark so much I almost argued with you for a lot of things but I kept telling myself that my knowledge is based of a video game with unicorns and griffins
I believe in ark cannon the dinosaurs are literally stated to have been genetically engineered on purpose to be inaccurate
If they rebooted Jurassic Park, would you love the chance to become the Palaeontologist for that movie? I wanna see some Dinosaurs with feathers.
+Rooster teethfan
Thats a cop out for excusing the spread of misinformation & bad science. The public is going to Jurassic Park films because they think they're real dinosaurs; not generic movie monsters.
With that logic, we will NEVER see realistic dinosaurs in film because everyone will chatter off rhetoric based in nostalgia & ignorance.
+NINmann01wiiU Thats already the case with the fanboys.
+Philip Ingrouille A remake of Jurassic Park would be one of the stupidest ideas ever. It´s one of the best films ever made. What it is possible to do, however, is try to make good movies with feathered dinosaurs. Not necessarily in the "Jurassic" Franchise.
+Arturo Garcia IT IS NOT the "'Jurassic '" franchise it is the "Jurassic Park" franchise! Also find Dinosaur Island some where and watch it that is for true dinosaur lovers
+Philip Ingrouille They gave raptors feathers in this one.
one more innaccruray
spot is supposed to be a black kid, not white kid
prehistoric humans were never white.
Idiots would be spouting about how having a primitive human black is "racist", even though that it makes perfect sense.
Never white unless they're Neanderthals.
Jeffrey Gao Spot is a Homo neanderthalensis.
More likely brown. The out of Africa theory is a common misconception, and it really shouldn't be taught in schools anymore. New theories say that people originated from the middle-east.
Santa Claus No they don’t. We still came from Africa, but also in different places. That’s what the evidence shows.
Also, I'm pretty sure that T rex didn't gallop.
it was just added ther
True, they 🏃
Caleb Sundquist Well actually,T.rex could not run very fast,therefore,this is inaccurate.T.rex was actually a pretty slow dinosaur being partly because of their weight.
@@jurassicpedia9081 this is not ment to accurate
Allison Worf-Anderson oh,sorry!😅
I’m gonna become an animator just so I can make an accurate Dino movie for Tray
I wanna do that too...
ok good
Is that three of us, or still two?
@@KougajiCalling I think 2. He’s just on board
@@Amorr53769 well at least we have support!
As an artist myself, I feel like adding the accuracies of feathers and fluff could actually benefit work, especially in animation. Feathers could add a cute factor or a creepy factor, all based on the placement of the feathers and you could really play with that. But instead we get a film that features just okay character design. Also, I really like how passionate you are about this subject.
The triceratops near the 14:00 mark is lvl 40 triceratops from JW The Gane ;)
Oh yeah
wow even disregarding all the paleontology-related errors, the asteroid belt depiction is so wrong. asteroids don't "bump into" each other, remember the main belt is 200 million kilometers thick and the circumference is bigger than mars' entire orbit. they are miles apart and very small, all the main belt asteroids combined have not even 5% the mass of the moon. it's more likely that asteroids would be disturbed by the gravity of jupiter than each other.
arowanafishing you are right I was thinking that
I was looking for this comment ! Was bout to comment it myself when I saw yours
yup the chance of that happening is one in billion
Lol “hyped” that was a time , when we didn’t know
to everyone who wants to leave a comment on this being a kids film and stuff, please note that this video was posted to highlight the inaccuraccies and to educate the public, and not to tease the flim for being inaccurate. PLEASE DO NOT LEAVE HATE COMMENTS. Thank you.
piss off
@Allison Worf-Anderson can you fucking read? This comment was from 2 fucking years ago. Also, you want kids to be fed all false information and lies, so they can have a harder time grasping to the truth in the future and realize what a shit filled childhood they had when they grow up?
@@luckyblockyoshi can I get some fucking respect
@@allisonworf-anderson7347 says the one who replied with "piss off"
@@luckyblockyoshi my sister smell like a horse litterly and my mom is a actuall hippo
I almost began to cry in happiness when he said "birds are dinosaurs too ya know." This is the only man who understands my struggle.
To be fair, I think a couple of these things are less simply blind inaccuracies, but rather character design choices. Yes, we know that pterosaurs didn't have teeth. Neither do crabs, but cartoon characters like Sebastian and Mr. Krabs have teeth in order to be given more relatable and vivid expressions in the face.
Nevertheless, great video! I still agree with most of the points you make here, and I definitely think it would've made the movie even greater to have more up-to-date dinos.
+JodrantheBlueKid Thank you and I do understand the need to add teeth to create facial expressions but when an animal's name means "Toothless Wing" I find it very ironic!
TREY the Explainer Yes, I agree, the irony is quite strong there XD
+TREY the Explainer There was an actual bigger Pterosaur with a crest and teeth that was a bit more recently discovered that pretty much looks similar to a lot of fictional depictions of Pterosaurs (but with fuzz instead of scales of course). It's Ludodactylus. Another Pterosaur with both a crest and teeth is Harpactognathus.
mjangelvortex The producers emailed me and they said they are not Ludodactylus or Harpactognathus, they are indeed Pteranodons
TREY the Explainer
They did? Neat. How'd you get their emails to talk with them? Or did they stumble across this video and email you?
Also I was just speaking in general. I know that the creatures in the film are neither Ludodactylus or Harpactognatus.
“Holy crap the Good Dinosaur looks amazing”
That didn’t last long now did it
TREY! There is a movie were they have accurate dinosaurs. even a fluffy trex! I think it's called "Dinosaur Island"
+Toy Red Rex “Dinosaur Kingdom” I sow the trailer for it! It was so purity!
Feathered T. rex? Then watch Dinosaur Island(2014)!
the triceratops from ark is a hybrid, if you didnt read the dossier
Sami Halwani, That’s all I could think about as I watched that part
This guy doesn’t care about the expanded universe. Just how accurate the dinosaurs are to their “closest” looking cousin.
if is a hybrid it should not be named triceratops
By the way a universal studios member told me the reason to why the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park didn’t have feathers because there was frog DNA in their genome
it is like cinema sins but with dinosaurs i love it!
+Noah Herbold Yesss!
"I'm so hyped and geared up to see it!"
Little does he know...
Yes...please...just give me a fuzzy t-rex and I'll forgive you for all these inaccuracies, Pixar!
The inaccuracies in this movie really depressed me.
I’m with you buddy.
@@LandBeforeTime75 you guys depressed me
The Land Before Time had more anatomically accurate dinosaurs than The Good Dinosaur!
Minus The SCALY Dimetrodon... And Roaring T Rex...
That T.rex made hissing sounds too.
@@LarsTonguesInAspix it wasn't ment to be accurate ether
It was made in 1988 and is a great movie.
Littlefoot is more likeable than Arlo.
What are the possibilities of an alternative to humans developing in a timeline where the KT mass extinction never happened I wonder? Like... Could it have been possible for sentient being to evolve from dinosaurs? That'd definitely be something I'd like to see if a book or movie or something was made about that.
It's very unlikely that Dinosaurs would evolve to something even remotely close to us, or int something even near sentient for that matter! Plus, it's problably impossible for Mammals to evolve into humans due to the presence of Dinosaurs, so you could consider the chance of that happening 0%.
I doubt if anything could have evolved to LOOK like us specifically, at least, not the dinosaurs, but it's possible that a species or multiple species of dinosaurs could have evolved to have human intelligence. Raptors and troodon come to mind.
oh the novel Far Seerer was from the perspective of an apprentice astrologer evolved from raptors.
If a niche is available, something will fill it. Yes it's possible if given the right circumstances a dinosaur could have evolved traits similar to humans.
"sentient" does not actually mean "human like intelligence". All sentience means is "the ability to feel or perceive things subjectively". There were almost definitely at least some dinosaurs that were capable of this; you'd be surprised at how many modern animals are classed as "sentient". It's really not a high barrier for entry. So dinosaurs likely DID reach a level of sentience.
We need to get rid of this ignorant perception that an animal is not "sentient" unless it demonstrates HUMAN like qualities. That's not what the word means, look it up for fuck's sake.
Love these kind of vids
+Claudia Alvarez Thanks :D
+TREY the Explainer #fluffytrex
+TREY the Explainer You should make more of these kinds of videos.how about you make a new series where you get a book, show, or movie about dinosaurs like the original Walking with Dinosaurs and explain whats accurate and whats inaccurate.
+TREY the Explainer You say that two species can not fill the same niche but, crocodiles and alligators in America fit the same niche and do not have much problems doing so.
+TREY the Explainer one of the pterosaurs are named for not having feathers. So no, your wrong again.
I think the trex’s had specifically bred the mammals to bring out such a niche with the trex’s scaring off any other competition.
to be fair ARK did admit that it wasnt a real triceratops
+Tinfoil Turtle Nguyen That still doesn't excuse inaccuracy... What if Interstellar featured an Inaccurate Black Hole or Wormhole and then said: "Well we admit it's not accurate so therefore our movie is still true to physics"...
+TREY the Explainer
Their black hole WAS inaccurate...the claims of accuracy were substantially exaggerated in the press.
+TREY the Explainer and aslo in arks defense the info page of the trike or dossier says that the trike is a sub speices created when triceratops bred with stryacosaurus creating the species then both died out leaving the hybrid species on the island ark is a really good game and its actually pretty good at having its dinos and prehistoric creatures scientificly accurate and makes up for inaccuracies by having every creature on the island be a sub species that doesn't exist in real life like the dilophosaurus its the jurassic park style dilophosaurus but they made it so it evolved the short size and poison spitting to better survive on the island the story on how all these different extinct creatures from different time periods came to exist together isn't known yet but the story is currently being developed so its interesting perhaps some alien race travels the universe gathering creatures before they go extinct and putting them on a nature reserve containing the environment of their homeworld it would explain why the games called ark and it would also explain how the original species evolved into the sub species but anyways ark keeps stuff decently accurate with the four legged spinosaurus and the fully feathered therizinosaurus which their planning to add sorry for the long paragraph love the dino videos cheers :D
1carperiii Preach it, although the pachyrhinosaurus was a bit much.....
if its a hybrid its SHOULD NOT BE NAMED TRICERATOPS,the liger is a hybrid beetwin tiger and lion but is named ligre,is not named lion or tiger,its should be named like strycotops or something
I know this has nothing to do with the video, but I just found a homeless or someones CAT sleeping on my pillow in my bed! I have no fucking idea how it got inside my house, or why it decided to sleep on my bed! Either way it was very friendly, and I carried him outside and gave him some catfood :) The weirdest thing about this, Is that before it meawed, I didn't even notice it, and somehow neither did my two cats or my dog who were all inside at that moment!
“Holy crap the good dinosaur looks amazing” oh boy he’s gonna be in for a disappointment
The biggest innacuracy of this film was to think those character designs would be appealing to both kids an adults, specially after making a movie like Finding Nemo.
A message to movie directors, next time you do a dinosaur movie, do it perfectly. Trey has educated you enough. We need to educate the younger generation about the REAL dinosaurs, not your fanboyish T. Rex lizards, as cool as they are. It's not this hard to make an accurate dinosaur and still make a good movie. Take a look at March of the Dinosaurs, or Dinosaur Island. It's not this hard people. 😔
+Lloyd Fernando While I do agree that movies need to be more accurate, Trey doesn't get everything right either
+Th Rei Yep. Everyone makes mistakes. I feel like the Jurassic park age is gonna go out with a bang before the accuracies settle in.
The first JP has an excuse for the feathers at least. The raptor wrists however...
+Lloyd Fernando Dinosaur Island accurate. That's a laugh. Dinosaur Island may have feathered dinosaurs but it got a lot of things wrong.
+Lloyd Fernando If They Used The Acurate Dinosaurs, I Personally Think They's Loose A LOT of viewers.
Also what about the running style of the t.rexes
Good point!
I thought you watch Dolphin documentary Jotaro ?
@@kio7320 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😅😄😅😅😆😆😅😅😄😅😆😅😆😅😆😅😄😅😆😅🤣😂😭😂🤣😂🤣😂
14:37
*A BIRD ON A BIRD*
Fr doe a bird on a bird what will they do
A birb on a birb: ruclips.net/video/I-OaO-HWTDY/видео.html
“Why does it matter if it’s not scientifically accurate it’s for kids” idk maybe if movies were accurate we wouldn’t get people like those ones who get unreasonably mad whenever anyone says t-Rex and raptors had feathers and incorrectly read scientific articles to try and “prove” they were entirely scaled, as if they’re winning something if the didn’t have feathers
and the popular idea of what dinos looked like might actually lean *away* from early paleo art instead of into it
12:26 - **looks at you**
Very well done! I myself am a huge dinosaur fan and like many have been since I was younger. While I do feel some of your points are a little nitpicky, I overall share your interest in helping others learn about how awesome dinosaurs were. Good job, sir. :)
u watch this channel too lol
you didn't ad the accuracies for the size of the asteroid and it coming from the asteroid belt.
Imagine if this movie had a realistic dinosaurs, flesh being ripped off of other dinosaurs, spot just being eaten because dinosaurs did not have an amygdala so they couldn't process any strong emotion
Actually, you missed a pretty big inaccuracy right at the beginning, although I wouldn't fault you for it, since you seem like more of a dinosaur guy than a space guy. But one thing that always bothers me is the media's depictions of the asteroid belt. The asteroid belt is not a ring so thick with asteroids that you can barely see through them. There are massive swathes of space in between each asteroid! It's only dangerous to fly through because the asteroids are moving so fast. I pray that one day somebody will get this right.
AgentOfTheNether yep. Spotted this right from the beginning. Expected him to do it.
I loved this, because is helped bring awareness to fight stereotypes. I'm not I big Dino nerd, but this was really cool. I will defiantly appreciate this movie a lot more. This was really cool!
+Elias Varn Thank you
*definitely
The sad thing is, the whole "extinction never happening" did affect the plot in any way
For some reason you've made me picture a trio of feathered T. rexes voiced by professional wrestlers. One has a mohawk and is voiced by Sheamus, one has dreads and is voiced by Mark Henry, and one has generic long hair and is voiced by the Undertaker.
i personally think the designs are meant to look like those old school dinosaur storybooks from the 1900s on purpose
Who knew actual dinosaurs would be so *C H O N K Y*
"66 Millions of years ago"
It could be that while the early dinosaurs wrists were unable to rotate, as they got smarter their arms evolved to be able to move more fluidly. It would be a pretty helpful adaptation for them as we see them picking up sticks and holding objects. I'm not defending this movie at all, but I just enjoyed the idea. There was a study done a couple of years ago that concluded that if the meteor hadn't hit, allot of dinosaurs would have died out slowly anyway as the environment changed. During the ice ages massive sauropods would have been driven to near extinction by the loss of both warm habitats and much lower food availability. They may have survived in the tropics, but many of the large species would vanish. This applies to many of the bigger dinosaurs, leaving only medium to small sized ones to inhabit the frozen north and south. Without these large herbivores, massive carnivores would be driven to extinction. It would be an even harder challenge for large eggs to survive the cold without freezing and, while incubating eggs would definitely help, it would still be challenging. Without many of the large dinosaurs around, the tundras and other cold areas would have many ecological niches available. This means that mammals, would have a chance to evolve from possum sized to much larger.
I liked the video btw.
WHAT ARE THOSE!!??
Trey, you bring joy to my life. 😊
But also love your video
+Captain Ry XD Thank you!
in fairness though, this is when dinosaurs started to evo mentally, like.... they could plan out stuff.. come up with ruses, communicate with other dinosaur species, have agriculture and build homes. Herbivores were just starting agriculture whereas the carnivorous species were still in a hunter-gatherer society with some larger species actually ranching cattle. Perhaps the reason these pseudo-buffalo creatures exists is because they were purposefully bred by larger carnivores, similar to how humans breed animals for purposes as well.. perhaps overtime some parts of the body change, like the crest getting smaller, or having fingers branch off a bit into something more like a hand to be more beneficial to a more intelligent species. We would not have gotten as far was we did without thumbs. The main events of the movie did not occur immediately after the asteroid avoided hitting the planet. There were millions of years between the extinction event and the events of this movie.
I do understand some of these other inaccuracies though. But little things like teeth and stuff, who knows? Again, millions of years occur between the mass extinction event and this movie.
They really need to stop over-using these dinosaurs ( Super Sauropods and some others are excused ), they actually need to switch over some roles like what they did in the Ice Age Dawn of the Dinosaurs. Spinosaurus vs Tyrannosaurus was very popular that time, or maybe getting popular, but they inter-switched Spinosaurus with the Baryonyx, so I have a list of some dinosaurs that needs to take a break from being seen a lot in movies, but overall, they did good jobs animating them.
+Dimorphodon on the Internet Please do correct me if that was a Baryonyx or something else related to the Spinosaurus.
+Dimorphodon on the Internet yes it was barry
@@albertovasquez7476 I hate these comments
every future movie made about dinosaurs needs you in the writing room
The ark trike is a hybrid of styracosaurus and trike, it says it in the dossier
Yes,Ark survival evolved
The place where all of your knowledge about dinosaur on Earth is useless
@@kio7320 He wasn't saying Ark was accurate. He was explaining that the RUclips poster was wrong about the Ark Trike, but that doesn't mean he's talking about real life ceratopsians.
@@freyjabeikon6556 i meant the knowledge in game. ARK is a good game but they don't give me much info about a new creature whenever i discovered about them so that's quite sad
i don't deserve subs it got a update it’s not 2016 anymore but I can see where you got confused. Google search Ark dossiers and you instantly find the dossier
14:13 actually the triceratops in ark is literally a hybrid of styracosaurus and triceratops
Should've been called Styracoceratops instead of just triceratops.
Remember when Jurassic Park tried to debunk pretty much all of 2:38 during the Brachiosaurus scene?
This movie is just a family friendly version of PRIMAL.
I know this was 1 month ago, but you seem pretty good at getting back to comments TREY
I'm surprised you didn't pick up on the locomotion. Arlo is able to gallop, which sauropods could never do because of their pillar like legs. I don't know But then his character design has bendier legs and emphasised knees.
Innacuracies extra to the trailer:
-The T-rex are shown bounding along like Kangaroos. It's great visually but is that even mechanically possible?
-Arlo is claimed to be an Apatosaurus by the creators, another genus which did not live up to the KT event so wouldn't be present at the timeline of this movie. As an Apatosaurus he should also have vertebral spines along his back.
You very rightly criticise the claim about 'all dinosaurs' going extinct, but you yourself should be careful of making sweeping statements. There were mammals larger than opossums during the mesozoic. Repenomamus giganticus was a 1m long mammalian carnivore from the early cretaceous. It doesn't impact on your main point of course, but just mentioning it in the interests of accuracy ;)
Dude calm down dude
10:27 You could say they were Ludodactylus instead of Pteranodon but that leads to more problems(too BIG for starters.)
agreed
This was a wonderful movie in terms of the story telling and absolute detail. I think this movie shows just how far special effects and animation has come since Walt Disney's first aired cartoon Steam Boat Willy.
What about the fact that Arlo is an Apotosauraus and is 11 years old and still living with his parents even though Apotosauraus's fully grow at age 10.
This aged like milk
Sense the good dinosaur takes place millions of years after the KT extinction should’ve happened that means that many new species of dinosaurs probably evolved. So maybe all of the inaccuracies of these dinosaurs are actually just different species of dinosaurs
Video didn't address Dinosaurs speaking english...everyone knows since this is in the Pacific Northwest they would have spoken French
it will be hard to understand french
To anyone who says this video is just nit picking a children's movie, just because it's a lesser known subject doesn't mean you can put factually inaccurate claims about it. It's not even that hard to do just a little research on the subject you're about to show to millions of children who know nothing about it and are likely not going to be educated about it. It's kind of insulting to a community of people who are interested in educating others about paleontology and people who have done actual research to draw the conclusions we have today, only to have it wasted by Disney showing kids this bs.
13:05 RIP at least you were correct based on the information you had
I'm not sure if you still do these, but I would love to see you analyze the 2000 Dinosaur movie (also made by disney).
I hope they saw this video and edited some stuff for the final movie because that would be great
Trey jumps from praising the animation to flaming it for inaccuracies faster than Jurassic Park's T.rex.