The classification of wet debate - Objection.lol

[@FrostDeino]

Enjoy the video?
Wanna join the server where these debates happen, and get turned into videos?
discord.gg/z2WM4xa8Pb
Watch the "Barbecue Sauce Incident" debate...: ruclips.net/video/Xl6ID4_s6hk/видео.htmlsi=ZGBqWlJV7qc61nml

[@sharkygameworld]

There’s H2O molecules in the air. Something with H2O on it is wet. Therefore, anything in contact with air, water, or anything containing water is wet.

[@lorddask4527]

The dictionary definition disproved their definitions as it stated wet was a state of being covered in a liquid, and water can’t be covered in water and therefore cannot be wet

[@DarklinkXXXX]

Wait why can't water be covered with water? Can't water be covered by more water?

[@FrostDeino]

All water is covered in water.
If two H2O molecules are touching, which they basically are, than it is covered in liquid and wet

[@Kougraex]

@@FrostDeino But what if the water is covered with Oil?
Would it not be wet... from the oil? 🙃

[@paytonbostwick2899]

@@Kougraex if you spill water and oil on something its still wet, just because of both

[@Kougraex]

@@paytonbostwick2899 I think you are missing the point. If for something to be wet it needs to be in contact or covered by a liquid. If water cannot be considered separable to be wet by itself, we just need to use... another liquid that does not mix with water. And thus, water can at least be made wet, despite it being intrinsically wet or not.

[@somechupacabrawithinternet8866]

what's queen doing in the thumbnail?......

[@FrostDeino]

3:11

[@thetoxicraptorz3482]

This was inspiring

[@landop3320]

who was in this debate this time

[@varianty_wowow]

real

[@FrostDeino]

ZAMN!

[@varianty_wowow]

@@FrostDeino it me, it me

[@АртемЛысенко-щ5ф]

turret here my bois

[@varianty_wowow]

@@АртемЛысенко-щ5ф hello im gamerman/it me