0:50 Trigger Discipline is not practiced during WW2. It's only a mandatory firearm discipline after the Vietnam War Also if you really want to be nitpicky: no one held pistols with both hands during WW2
@@Nate_M_PCMR they were trained to hold pistols with a single hand. But then again, no one carried their rifles like the ones in-game. They had to carry it at the base of the weapon. Instead of the "ready to fire" style in FPS games.
@@TheEditorMatt I think its campaign and multiplayer is better, but vanguards zombies is better ONLY because it has way, way more features (aka its a reskinned cw zombies)
Its understandable when the plot points out the main character isn't exactly the smartest, untrained military wise or inexperienced with firearms. If its a proper soldier with combat or anything to do with guns, yeah that's bad.
1:58 to be fair you can load the Gewehr 43 by changing the magazine or by stripper clips but usually I've seen the Gewehr 43 most commonly loaded with magazines. During the war, to save on resources and all, I'm sure its easier to just use stripper clips instead of changing the whole magazine.
@Wilhelm Von Berghoff Gewehr 43 like the SVT 40, was only issued with two spare magazines (plus the one in the gun) so you wouldn't be changing mags very often, and would mostly use stripper clips
@@seanherrmann6301 SVT were actually issued with 3 magazines (1 in the gun, two spare) and 12 stripper clips. In soviet supply system stripper clips were issued with guns, not with ammo
@jerbs5346 it's not that people are irresponsible now with guns, it's just feral blacks committing so much gun crime in the USA. If you got rid of all the black crime, the gun crime in the USA would be around the same as Belgium.
Good video but I don't quite get the Magnum nitpick, yes it was never "standard issue" to the US Army but officers could buy their own sidearms instead of using the 1911 and it wasnt out of the ordinary for enlisted to carry pistols they acquired as well. There are in fact some written accounts of Registered Magnums being carried into combat by US troops simply because they had purchased them back home and brought them along with them.
I read that this tradition was kept in the army up to even the Vietnam war, where soldiers would bring their own weapons with them. But after this there were done more rigorous checks, so during the Iraq war the practice was stamped out completely.
One word for flicking a revolver. *you are in a war, with people dying all over, or inside a tiny bunker with zombies trying to eat you* Not to be rude but its not like a shooting range, i would honestly rather reload more conveniently than just you know. Doing it properly
@@freedoomer2524 they dont add more than one animation now, they wont back in the early 2000s where they gave a shit gameplay wise, its a gun in a old Arcade WW2 fast paced dark era FPS. Not a Gun Simulator in a controlled environment.
@@Krejii05 bro im talking about the people that make gun showcase videos and say how flicking it shut isnt reccomended. I know its a damn game but there are games that do it properly
@@freedoomer2524 yes, but im saying, it makes sense, that a game based in WW2, you know a *war* with drafted soldiers would want to load a gun faster than properly
Good video, if I may though : - The M7 launcher entered service in 1943 and was widely used. - For the Springfield M1903A1 it's not missing the front sight, they literally modeled what looks like a M1903A4 instead of the proper A1. - Holding a STG 44 by the mag is un-practical as it's way too low and close to the other hand and may cause jam. On an other matter, it's funny how this game from 2008 is still more historically accurate than Vanguard lmao. - The FG 42 is missing its bipod.
Also the MG42 reload is incorrect with the bolt being pulled back after loading in a new belt even though it should be done before putting in a new belt since it’s open bolt
in the campaign, every fg42 you can find is classed as deployable, and I'm pretty sure there is a bipod on the model, but you can never actually deploy it Plus the fg42 cannot swap between semi-auto and full auto (it could in earlier cod games)
Actually holding the STG44 by the mag was actually often used as the metal handguards would get hot pretty quickly. While you are sacrificing recoil control, if you're not wearing thick gloves, you would burn your hands otherwise.
The G41 was only loaded with stripper clips, while the G43 was loaded with both magazine and strippers, atleast from what I can gather. This can also be applied to the SVT 38 and SVT 40.
A soldier who had a G43 or SVT-40 would have a few loaded magazines but more stripper clips mainly due to logistics, plus so you don't just dump the empty magazine on the ground during a fire fight
Another sin for rifle grenade launchers on bolt-action rifles: the guy keeps shooting and putting the grenades on the barrel, but doesn't chamber another round
Shhh, Munancho tries to be cool by copying other famous channels, like CinemaSins and M4sked, but being a cringe kid and failling at both. I mean... the guy once answered my question to where does he takes his info and he replied that he gets his own research from forums. Not manuals or actual gun experts... but f*cking random forums.
Although it was possible, topping off the M1 was never done in combat. GIs and Marines didn't generally carry loose rounds for their rifles, why would they? They generally either emptied the magazine or did partial reloads although the latter wasn't as common. Secondly, the only difference between a Registered Magnum and a Model 27 was the markings. Smith & Wesson moved from model names to model numbers in the mid-50s. Other than that, good video.
Honestly if they a made a “World At War 2” with updated graphics, fixed animation errors and bugs, added new weapons that weren’t DLC, I think we’d all go nuts for it. I love this game. I recognise its flaws and errors but it’s an inditement on the current gaming industry that a game from 2008 with its hardware limitations and technically less knowledge of WW2…is better than a game made this year.
1:11 springfields were only seen limited to snipers at this time which chopped off the front sight post. The scope could be a bit more historically accurate since US marksman optics were usually very low powered (only 3.5x). What's shown in WAW is an anachronistic 8x scope that was seen during the Rice Farmer War
No? The US Army used a variety of low power scopes on its own sniper rifle variant, the M1903A4, and that one did have no front sight. However, the USMC adopted the 8x Unertl scope to fit on its 1903A1s (which should be the variant in-game), and those kept the front sight. The "anachronistic 8x scope [in Vietnam]" you refer to was the same Unertl from WW2, just mounted on Winchester model 70s. The specific 3D model in-game is still inaccurate though, for example it doesn't have the external adjustment knobs.
I like the manner of the pistol handling in this game, Holding the pistols with a teacup grip wasn't wrong (for that time), altough holding it with just one hand is a far more correct for the game's history setting. But at least the teacup grip is far more suited instead of the modern finger-wrapping pistol grip in vanguard 🤢
Sometimes the "this gun was never used" can be forgiven if its in the same timeframe. But ONLY if its done right (Being the HIGHEST level, going through quite some trouble for it) Honestly the bolt not opening thing I forgive as well since... Ya know- 2009 PS3/XBOX 360 limitations as well as the DB ejecting rifle casings since the jank system most likely didn't allow a gun to *not* eject casings in one for or another.
I don’t think a lot of people know but Americans in ww2 used guns they got sent from home all the had to do is ask their commander if it ok and find ammo for it so some people would have used revolver hell a general used a single action army revolver
I agree, and if the mosin doesn’t open the bolt then it’s still fine compared to lots of other guns in either vanguard or waw, I mean at least the thing looks and functions as it should
Limitations? That doesn't make any sense, a bunch of the other bolt guns have the bolt opening properly, it's just animation jank. Same with the DBS firing casings, it's the only gun that does that, it's just an oversight too.
About the shotguns tube capacity, in WAW the trench gun actually does hold 6 shells. I think in multiplayer they only had it hold 4 for a balancing purpose cuz shot guns are pretty annoying to go against
@@GetTheFO I remember vaguely of how terrible it was to be on the other end either shotgun since it was all about the MP40 + Jug + steady aim meta plagued the game. It's been over 10 years since I played the game. Good times.
@@sacredprovenance I still remember going into lobbies where literally everyone was running the MP40 hahaha. Swear some of the best times I’ve had in games were on WaW.
Tbh the time period makes the trigger discipline normal. If anything it would be odd to see it in active practice in this time period. Also them 2d png mags tho
I just noticed that the Sturmgewehr was ejecting full size Mauser casings. No wonder Vanguard got it wrong, they saw this game and were like "let's do that again!"
The Thompson drum if it theoretically would fit in the m1a1, would go in sideways not upwards, also the fg42 has a last round bolt hold open on the full auto mode, so the reload animation is incorrect. The german soldiers were actually issued with spare G43 magazines, and had pouches for said magazines, and I have a feeling it was even more unlikely to see a double barreled shotgun in ww2 than it was to see a .357 magnum revolver. Also, holding a 1919 that way is actually fine, especially considering the in game character has some cloth or whatever wrapped around the barrel. The bigger issue would be since you're essentially holding a machine gun by the stock, your hands would likely hurt from the weight and power of the machine gun if you shot it long enough.
4:28 I know most side loaded SMGs shouldn't be held by the mag, but doesn't the curved magazine allow that to be possible without causing jamming? I know guns like the MP18 did allow it, but I forget if the 100 could as well.
4:41 I think it makes sense the Americans wouldn’t hold the gun correctly as it’s a foreign gun in the campaign I’m pretty sure the Japanese actually do hold the gun correctly
Yeah, that can be seen in the Russian Campaign, how you (Dimitri Petrenko) reloads and holds the STG44 and the MP40 in a way that you can see he doesn't understand how to properly use it
2:17 That's complete and utter bulls*it nitpicking, because let's be honest: it's way more simple to just eject the partially empty en-bloc clip than to manually top it off with one round at a time in the heat of battle. Jonathan Ferguson, the weapons curator and expert at the Royal Armouries said it himself in Gamespot's video about Battlefield V weapons. Many Garand owners also said it was a chore to top off an M1 Garand rifle. 6:38 That's just pure bulls*it, it's not even nitpicking, the M7 GL actually entered production and saw widespread use from 1943 and onward.
@@mildlyupset6011 Ah, but I am not nitpicky about things that have been wronged in WaW. Like the Thompson M1A1 accepting a drum mag or having to lock back the bolt handle. However... when you are being nitpicky, do it right or don't do it at all, otherwise, you are just one hypocrite douchebag.
As incorrect as the StG reload is, yalls have to admit, that shit is fresh. M1919 texts reads w. it being chambered in '54R and originating from Russia. There was an R.Pz.B. 54/1 Shreck with a shortened tube length iirc. The M7 rifle grenade launcher was absolutely used in the war--on the M1.
The M7 launcher as i recall wasn't used significantly in the Pacific as much compared to the Korean War, the Panzerschreck model used in game wasn't the shortened model due to the shield.
One thing you missed is on almost all the bolt actions, the rear of the bolt turns when it shouldn't. It should stay in the same position when unlocking.
M4sked did not say "flicking the revolver's cylinder shut isn't recommended as it could damage the crane" It was originally from FrostThreat48's imfamous quote.
Ptrs was so hard to fire that even if u get a shot while prone in real life it has a massive recoil hit that it was the main reason of some anti tank unit solider broke their shoulders
The reason why the sound of depicted accurate is because they use real gun sounds the development team literally went to a firing range to fire the weapons
The M1 Carbine does have a bolt hold system although it's manual, there's a small button on the top side that you press down on while pulling the bolt back to lock it. Still, it isn't automatic as the game depicts although I wish that was the case IRL
The thing with the Garand is 100% true. It's kind of an intricate process, but you can essentially pin the clip between the bolt and the breech, allowing you to stick some more rounds into it.
Few addition for DP-27/8: 1. It should have slightly higher fire rate. 2. Russians usually refer it as DP-27 which is referred to the year it was designed, 1927. While the West refer it as DP-28 for the year it was produced. 3. For some reason, it was only appeared in Multiplayer despite it's a perfect weapon for the Single Player mode. But there are some historical mods could be able to solve this and its fire rate for us, thankfully.
0:56 The Kar98k shouldn't have the extractor rotating with the bolt... Also, the springfield scoped variant depicted here is the M1903A4, and it never had iron sights...
One thing about the trigger discipline is that, when we look at pictures from the past, it seems that a lot of people (even in the military and police service) just didn't give a damn about keeping your finger off the trigger.
Can't remember if I commented on this video or another one but the M1919A4 is all jacked up. It looks like he's holding the barrel jacket with a cloth ammo belt wrapped around to protect your hand. While a good idea, it doesn't help much with raising it up to eye level and shooting as it weighs 35lbs. When you hold it by the barrel jacket and the pistol grip it's very awkward and hard to hold up even with good upper body strength. The sights are also incorrect. They're flipped up and missing the adjustable aperture. Lastly, the reloading is all wrong. It's a closed bolt machine gun and there is no bolt hold open. There was a safety bar that could be added but it's not on there as far as I could tell. And even if it was you don't pull it forward as the bolt will potentially not seat correctly if helped forward. When reloading you do it one of two ways. 1. Open the top cover, lift up the feed pawl, place ammo into feed tray, lower the feed pawl on first round, close feed tray cover, and then pull the bolt to the rear and release. 2. Insert cloth belt with metal pull tab into the opening of the feed tray with the cover closed, pull and release the bolt to the rear twice. I know that's super in-depth but I own one and I hate when it's portrayed wrong.
Yeah, that cloth isn't doing a lot. After 50 rounds, it'd catch on fire. Not even joking, it would literally start a fire. US troops did carry them around like that, but it wasn't meant to be used with a hand around the barrel and the cloth would be ditched in a prolonged firefight.
the P-38 did not had a push butene mag release by the trigger that let the mag drop freely. like the M1911, and TT-33 have. the p38 has what is called a Heel type release underneath the grip. meaning you would have to use yore other hand to strip the mag out.
You can also see a spring inside the MP40 which is incorrect, the MP40 has a unique return spring system where the spring is captive inside a telescoping assembly for better reliability
3:32 The Trench Gun has the correct capacity in campaign (5+1), but it was changed to 4 in MP for balance like W1200 in CoD4.
You mean m1014
@@Danknic1234 you're right
@@chrisgreely5958 your welcome
@@Danknic1234 you're welcome* you're welcome.
@@bulletprovider6956 yro'ue*
This is the best WWII Call of Duty game to date. And it's 13 years old.
CoD2 and brothers in arms road to hill 30/hell’s highway:Are you challenging me?
@@g3tshotheett WaW: Damn right I'm challenging you.
And so do I
And it was released on veterans day too
The only game I can afford
0:50 Trigger Discipline is not practiced during WW2. It's only a mandatory firearm discipline after the Vietnam War
Also if you really want to be nitpicky: no one held pistols with both hands during WW2
No one? Why?
Ah my mistake.
@@Nate_M_PCMR they were trained to hold pistols with a single hand. But then again, no one carried their rifles like the ones in-game. They had to carry it at the base of the weapon. Instead of the "ready to fire" style in FPS games.
@@munanchoinc Alright, now I learned more about ww2 than my teacher taught my class
@@munanchoinc
or in short, "Point shooting" technique
If I hear one more "Flicking the crane..." nitpick I'm gonna start doing the hokey pokey
bro, the hokey pokey lmfaooooo
Start dancin B, they ain’t gonna stop
The "this is not okey dokey hokey pokey"
What
oh boy
They were truly just held back by the technology of the time, and even if its from 2008 its so much better than vanguard 😂
I feel bad for u.
Just because it’s old doesn’t mean it’s better backed by nostalgia
*Stares intensely*
@@thehorrorking2499 I feel bad for yo dead channel 😂
@@TheEditorMatt I think its campaign and multiplayer is better, but vanguards zombies is better ONLY because it has way, way more features (aka its a reskinned cw zombies)
Revolvers in a nutshell:
"DoNt FlIcK tHe CiLiNdEr, As It CoUlD dAmAgE tHe CrAnE"
Does it anyway.
Its understandable when the plot points out the main character isn't exactly the smartest, untrained military wise or inexperienced with firearms. If its a proper soldier with combat or anything to do with guns, yeah that's bad.
@@The__Interloper It's half explainable for people like Gordon Freeman
Fun is not allowed
The campaign has the pump shotgun hold 6 shells inside
You can do that to the real shotgun when loading 1 into the firing chamber and 5 into the mag tube
1:58 to be fair you can load the Gewehr 43 by changing the magazine or by stripper clips but usually I've seen the Gewehr 43 most commonly loaded with magazines. During the war, to save on resources and all, I'm sure its easier to just use stripper clips instead of changing the whole magazine.
It's actually much easier to load with stripper clips as the size and the weight of magazines was much more cumbersome to load.
@Wilhelm Von Berghoff Gewehr 43 like the SVT 40, was only issued with two spare magazines (plus the one in the gun) so you wouldn't be changing mags very often, and would mostly use stripper clips
@@seanherrmann6301 SVT were actually issued with 3 magazines (1 in the gun, two spare) and 12 stripper clips. In soviet supply system stripper clips were issued with guns, not with ammo
@@ЕвгенийМакаров-в6л Yes, that is what I said. Thanks for the information on the number of stripper clips though
@@ЕвгенийМакаров-в6л 2 spare plus 1=3 🙂
Fun fact: Trigger discipline was not tought during ww2 while reloading a firearm
@@familyofsavag4406 Fun fact: who cares
Sad fact: People in the 40s were more responsible with guns than people now.
@jerbs5346 it's not that people are irresponsible now with guns, it's just feral blacks committing so much gun crime in the USA. If you got rid of all the black crime, the gun crime in the USA would be around the same as Belgium.
Good video but I don't quite get the Magnum nitpick, yes it was never "standard issue" to the US Army but officers could buy their own sidearms instead of using the 1911 and it wasnt out of the ordinary for enlisted to carry pistols they acquired as well. There are in fact some written accounts of Registered Magnums being carried into combat by US troops simply because they had purchased them back home and brought them along with them.
General s patton carried his own smith and wesson in ww2 he loved that gun during his excursion againts pancho villa
I read that this tradition was kept in the army up to even the Vietnam war, where soldiers would bring their own weapons with them.
But after this there were done more rigorous checks, so during the Iraq war the practice was stamped out completely.
flicking a revolver open or shut isnt recommended
"topping off" the garand clip is a pain
The Bars charging handle does lock to the back
One word for flicking a revolver.
*you are in a war, with people dying all over, or inside a tiny bunker with zombies trying to eat you*
Not to be rude but its not like a shooting range, i would honestly rather reload more conveniently than just you know. Doing it properly
@@Krejii05 yeah however everyones always going on about flicking it closed
@@freedoomer2524 they dont add more than one animation now, they wont back in the early 2000s where they gave a shit gameplay wise, its a gun in a old Arcade WW2 fast paced dark era FPS. Not a Gun Simulator in a controlled environment.
@@Krejii05 bro im talking about the people that make gun showcase videos and say how flicking it shut isnt reccomended. I know its a damn game but there are games that do it properly
@@freedoomer2524 yes, but im saying, it makes sense, that a game based in WW2, you know a *war* with drafted soldiers would want to load a gun faster than properly
Good video, if I may though :
- The M7 launcher entered service in 1943 and was widely used.
- For the Springfield M1903A1 it's not missing the front sight, they literally modeled what looks like a M1903A4 instead of the proper A1.
- Holding a STG 44 by the mag is un-practical as it's way too low and close to the other hand and may cause jam.
On an other matter, it's funny how this game from 2008 is still more historically accurate than Vanguard lmao.
- The FG 42 is missing its bipod.
There is a bipod version of the fg42
You can add the bipod in the multiplayer
Also the MG42 reload is incorrect with the bolt being pulled back after loading in a new belt even though it should be done before putting in a new belt since it’s open bolt
in the campaign, every fg42 you can find is classed as deployable, and I'm pretty sure there is a bipod on the model, but you can never actually deploy it
Plus the fg42 cannot swap between semi-auto and full auto (it could in earlier cod games)
Actually holding the STG44 by the mag was actually often used as the metal handguards would get hot pretty quickly. While you are sacrificing recoil control, if you're not wearing thick gloves, you would burn your hands otherwise.
I maintain that a lot of these are technical limitations, or to save memory (like not modelling inside the Type-99)
The G43 and the svt40 where issued with 3 mag and stripper clips to reload said mags. The G41 on the other hand
The G41 was only loaded with stripper clips, while the G43 was loaded with both magazine and strippers, atleast from what I can gather. This can also be applied to the SVT 38 and SVT 40.
A soldier who had a G43 or SVT-40 would have a few loaded magazines but more stripper clips mainly due to logistics, plus so you don't just dump the empty magazine on the ground during a fire fight
Another sin for rifle grenade launchers on bolt-action rifles: the guy keeps shooting and putting the grenades on the barrel, but doesn't chamber another round
1:12 But that's supposed to be the M1903A4 which has the iron-sights removed for sniper roles.
Shhh, Munancho tries to be cool by copying other famous channels, like CinemaSins and M4sked, but being a cringe kid and failling at both.
I mean... the guy once answered my question to where does he takes his info and he replied that he gets his own research from forums.
Not manuals or actual gun experts... but f*cking random forums.
@@Antimanele104 Ow, the edge
@@Antimanele104 Whoa, calm down bro
@@marjoriedevera1457 I'm pretty calm now.
@@Antimanele104 shh, you're annoying af and a child
Although it was possible, topping off the M1 was never done in combat. GIs and Marines didn't generally carry loose rounds for their rifles, why would they? They generally either emptied the magazine or did partial reloads although the latter wasn't as common.
Secondly, the only difference between a Registered Magnum and a Model 27 was the markings. Smith & Wesson moved from model names to model numbers in the mid-50s.
Other than that, good video.
Pulling the charging handle is necessary on the Thompson drum mags as they don’t have a bolt hold open, but yeah the m1a1 can’t even accept drum mags.
Honestly if they a made a “World At War 2” with updated graphics, fixed animation errors and bugs, added new weapons that weren’t DLC, I think we’d all go nuts for it.
I love this game. I recognise its flaws and errors but it’s an inditement on the current gaming industry that a game from 2008 with its hardware limitations and technically less knowledge of WW2…is better than a game made this year.
Don't give them ideas
They did what they did with the Black Ops name, don't let them ruin the World at War name as well.
WAW remastered would be better I feel for the changes and fixes you suggested.
@@deathkorpsgrenadier2419 Could you blame Treyarch for Cold War though? It's Activision's fault all the way.
CoD ww2!!
@@deathkorpsgrenadier2419cold war? Best gamer ever
1:11 springfields were only seen limited to snipers at this time which chopped off the front sight post.
The scope could be a bit more historically accurate since US marksman optics were usually very low powered (only 3.5x). What's shown in WAW is an anachronistic 8x scope that was seen during the Rice Farmer War
No? The US Army used a variety of low power scopes on its own sniper rifle variant, the M1903A4, and that one did have no front sight. However, the USMC adopted the 8x Unertl scope to fit on its 1903A1s (which should be the variant in-game), and those kept the front sight. The "anachronistic 8x scope [in Vietnam]" you refer to was the same Unertl from WW2, just mounted on Winchester model 70s. The specific 3D model in-game is still inaccurate though, for example it doesn't have the external adjustment knobs.
So much better than Vanguard though,too bad they didn’t just remaster this
We really shouldn't wouldn't be the same a you can't really capture lightning in a bottle and b you know they'd fuck it up
Guntubers when you gently flick a revolver:🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤬🤯🤯
Guntubers when someone manually closes the cylinder as hard as they physically can:🥰
I like the manner of the pistol handling in this game, Holding the pistols with a teacup grip wasn't wrong (for that time), altough holding it with just one hand is a far more correct for the game's history setting. But at least the teacup grip is far more suited instead of the modern finger-wrapping pistol grip in vanguard 🤢
The k98k reload bugged me purely because they just shove the whole 5 round clip in after you shoot one shot
Yeah lol
Sometimes the "this gun was never used" can be forgiven if its in the same timeframe. But ONLY if its done right (Being the HIGHEST level, going through quite some trouble for it)
Honestly the bolt not opening thing I forgive as well since... Ya know- 2009 PS3/XBOX 360 limitations as well as the DB ejecting rifle casings since the jank system most likely didn't allow a gun to *not* eject casings in one for or another.
I don’t think a lot of people know but Americans in ww2 used guns they got sent from home all the had to do is ask their commander if it ok and find ammo for it so some people would have used revolver hell a general used a single action army revolver
I agree, and if the mosin doesn’t open the bolt then it’s still fine compared to lots of other guns in either vanguard or waw, I mean at least the thing looks and functions as it should
Limitations? That doesn't make any sense, a bunch of the other bolt guns have the bolt opening properly, it's just animation jank. Same with the DBS firing casings, it's the only gun that does that, it's just an oversight too.
Browning 1919A4
Nation: USA
Caliber: 30-06 Springfield
About the shotguns tube capacity, in WAW the trench gun actually does hold 6 shells. I think in multiplayer they only had it hold 4 for a balancing purpose cuz shot guns are pretty annoying to go against
They were an absolute annoyance to go against in WaW considering the DB shotgun and Trench Gun had a decent range.
@@sacredprovenance The DB was great, I always felt they nerfed the shit out of the trenchgun compared to what it could have done.
@@GetTheFO I remember vaguely of how terrible it was to be on the other end either shotgun since it was all about the MP40 + Jug + steady aim meta plagued the game. It's been over 10 years since I played the game. Good times.
@@sacredprovenance I still remember going into lobbies where literally everyone was running the MP40 hahaha. Swear some of the best times I’ve had in games were on WaW.
Springfield in Campaign and MP: 😁
Springfield in Zombies: 🙁
1:26 but that’s correct? the sniper variant usually won’t have the iron sights.
The scope would be attached to an iron sight railing. There isn’t one though
@@Clarity_Control not with the optic used here
4:19 Thompson drum mags cannot be pulled out vertically
On a lot of the guns, you point out inaccuracies that were never even meant to be seen, due to you having a higher FOV than the default of the game.
Yeah that kinda shouldnt count
@@Alex-hp8ew yeah this game is so old they probably couldn’t do *that* much to the guns, especially to the things hidden outside of the FOV.
Tbh the time period makes the trigger discipline normal. If anything it would be odd to see it in active practice in this time period.
Also them 2d png mags tho
I just noticed that the Sturmgewehr was ejecting full size Mauser casings. No wonder Vanguard got it wrong, they saw this game and were like "let's do that again!"
"Bolt never opens to eject the casings" Oof, can't believe I never noticed that before..
The Thompson drum if it theoretically would fit in the m1a1, would go in sideways not upwards, also the fg42 has a last round bolt hold open on the full auto mode, so the reload animation is incorrect. The german soldiers were actually issued with spare G43 magazines, and had pouches for said magazines, and I have a feeling it was even more unlikely to see a double barreled shotgun in ww2 than it was to see a .357 magnum revolver. Also, holding a 1919 that way is actually fine, especially considering the in game character has some cloth or whatever wrapped around the barrel. The bigger issue would be since you're essentially holding a machine gun by the stock, your hands would likely hurt from the weight and power of the machine gun if you shot it long enough.
I thought you just kinda shoved Thompson mags in the gun any way you could, considering how tight the mag well is. Am I right?
@@Dave11078 i think there's slots in the mag well that make you slide it in a certain way
@@_suko_3656 yeah on the M1921 and M1928 the reciever had slots milled into the magwell to accept type "C" and type "L" drum magaziines
You...YOU DID IT!!
You touched the untouchable game.
The one every OG cod danboy praises like a god.
4:28 I know most side loaded SMGs shouldn't be held by the mag, but doesn't the curved magazine allow that to be possible without causing jamming? I know guns like the MP18 did allow it, but I forget if the 100 could as well.
Amazing that it has less mistakes as an over decade old game with a relatively smaller budget than others games of the time
4:11 the m1a1 Thompson was issued with 30 round mags instead of 20 round mags.
Incoming “aT lEAst it MoRe acCuraTE thAn vAngURd ar ar ar”
It is
For being 15 years old this games animations hold up incredibly well.
technically the animations are older because most of them were ported from cod 1, 2 and 3
4:44 I'm not trying to start nothing... But even the army holds it by the magazine.
4:41 I think it makes sense the Americans wouldn’t hold the gun correctly as it’s a foreign gun in the campaign I’m pretty sure the Japanese actually do hold the gun correctly
Yeah, that can be seen in the Russian Campaign, how you (Dimitri Petrenko) reloads and holds the STG44 and the MP40 in a way that you can see he doesn't understand how to properly use it
@@obrechen1306 yeah great attention to detail
2:17
That's complete and utter bulls*it nitpicking, because let's be honest: it's way more simple to just eject the partially empty en-bloc clip than to manually top it off with one round at a time in the heat of battle. Jonathan Ferguson, the weapons curator and expert at the Royal Armouries said it himself in Gamespot's video about Battlefield V weapons. Many Garand owners also said it was a chore to top off an M1 Garand rifle.
6:38 That's just pure bulls*it, it's not even nitpicking, the M7 GL actually entered production and saw widespread use from 1943 and onward.
Videos about ww2 and vanguard are about the same level of nitpicky, but people aren’t as defensive about them
@@mildlyupset6011 Ah, but I am not nitpicky about things that have been wronged in WaW.
Like the Thompson M1A1 accepting a drum mag or having to lock back the bolt handle.
However... when you are being nitpicky, do it right or don't do it at all, otherwise, you are just one hypocrite douchebag.
He called the browning a Russian firearm. What a clown
As incorrect as the StG reload is, yalls have to admit, that shit is fresh.
M1919 texts reads w. it being chambered in '54R and originating from Russia.
There was an R.Pz.B. 54/1 Shreck with a shortened tube length iirc.
The M7 rifle grenade launcher was absolutely used in the war--on the M1.
The M7 launcher as i recall wasn't used significantly in the Pacific as much compared to the Korean War, the Panzerschreck model used in game wasn't the shortened model due to the shield.
2:52 COD2 M1A1 Carbine : *B r u h*
Sniper Springfield should be renamed M1903A4. This model correct for not having any iron sights, believe it or not
One thing you missed is on almost all the bolt actions, the rear of the bolt turns when it shouldn't. It should stay in the same position when unlocking.
That Garand Ping compilation though
5:34 Browning M1919 is a closed bolt machine gun. So the bolt does not open while reloading
M4sked did not say "flicking the revolver's cylinder shut isn't recommended as it could damage the crane"
It was originally from FrostThreat48's imfamous quote.
Ptrs was so hard to fire that even if u get a shot while prone in real life it has a massive recoil hit that it was the main reason of some anti tank unit solider broke their shoulders
The reason why the sound of depicted accurate is because they use real gun sounds the development team literally went to a firing range to fire the weapons
the M1903A1 gets converted in to a A4 when the sniper scope gets put on.
05:04 missed opportunity for a Frank Woods soundclip "Safety is on, Dipshit!"
"hUrR dUrR dOnT fLiCk DuH cYlInDuR, yOuLl BrEaK tHe CrAnE"
That's Fudd Lore my guy
The M1 Carbine does have a bolt hold system although it's manual, there's a small button on the top side that you press down on while pulling the bolt back to lock it. Still, it isn't automatic as the game depicts although I wish that was the case IRL
For a 2008, this game is fairly accurate for it's weapon portrayal.
1:02 I love how he strongly bamp the strip clip
the Springfield 1903A4 was never given irons because they reserved it to a sniper role since the garand had taken its place
The thing with the Garand is 100% true. It's kind of an intricate process, but you can essentially pin the clip between the bolt and the breech, allowing you to stick some more rounds into it.
more like 50% true, yeah it's possible but I doubt it was done more than very rarely.
They obviously didn’t have good animation back then so I’m not surprised that some mags are empty or still have ammo after reloading
Few addition for DP-27/8:
1. It should have slightly higher fire rate.
2. Russians usually refer it as DP-27 which is referred to the year it was designed, 1927. While the West refer it as DP-28 for the year it was produced.
3. For some reason, it was only appeared in Multiplayer despite it's a perfect weapon for the Single Player mode. But there are some historical mods could be able to solve this and its fire rate for us, thankfully.
0:56 The Kar98k shouldn't have the extractor rotating with the bolt...
Also, the springfield scoped variant depicted here is the M1903A4, and it never had iron sights...
the scope put on the PTRS-41 looks like something off of a modern day hunting rifle you can get at Cabela's. also I think its on backwards.
pretty good, cant wait to see you do Call of Duty 4
Every pistol looks like its in a strict diet lmao
anytime you see the safety is on play that clip from bo2 where woods says to harper "safety's on dipshit" pls thatd be hilarious
One thing about the trigger discipline is that, when we look at pictures from the past, it seems that a lot of people (even in the military and police service) just didn't give a damn about keeping your finger off the trigger.
Also about the revlover, Some soldier (usualy officer) often use their personal weapon, they usualy smuggle their weapon in the package from family
You forgot to mention that the MG42 bolt should be pulled back first before putting in a new belt since it’s open bolt
3:19
Holds 6 rounds in Zombies, but the character doesn't chamber a round first.
Ferguson be like:"Arghhhh ahhhhhh Ahhhhhhh *more goofy aah noises* "
THE THOMSON ONLY HOLDING 20 WHEN IT CLEARLY HAS A 30 ROUND MAG HAS ALWAYS ATE AT MY SOUL
The Tommy Gun also had 20 round box magazines alongside the 30 round ones and they were incredibly common in WW2.
Well, they atleast have more authentic WW2 experience than vanguard
Definitely, and a lot more of a dark story than SJW russian lady and the officer who should be fragged by the entire squad
@@LONEWOLF109 SJW Russian lady?
@@mildlyupset6011 polina peltrova the real story of the sniper is many times more interesting
@@mildlyupset6011 Lyudmila Mikhailovna Pavlichenko
@@LONEWOLF109 yeah, I don’t understand the sjw part.
Can't remember if I commented on this video or another one but the M1919A4 is all jacked up. It looks like he's holding the barrel jacket with a cloth ammo belt wrapped around to protect your hand. While a good idea, it doesn't help much with raising it up to eye level and shooting as it weighs 35lbs. When you hold it by the barrel jacket and the pistol grip it's very awkward and hard to hold up even with good upper body strength. The sights are also incorrect. They're flipped up and missing the adjustable aperture. Lastly, the reloading is all wrong. It's a closed bolt machine gun and there is no bolt hold open. There was a safety bar that could be added but it's not on there as far as I could tell. And even if it was you don't pull it forward as the bolt will potentially not seat correctly if helped forward. When reloading you do it one of two ways. 1. Open the top cover, lift up the feed pawl, place ammo into feed tray, lower the feed pawl on first round, close feed tray cover, and then pull the bolt to the rear and release.
2. Insert cloth belt with metal pull tab into the opening of the feed tray with the cover closed, pull and release the bolt to the rear twice.
I know that's super in-depth but I own one and I hate when it's portrayed wrong.
For anyone's information, the Blue money m1 grand ping is called PSA: Galant
Can you upload a compilation of your own animations and designs I think it'd be really cool to see your work.
3:19 I’m having a goddamn mental breakdown what the fuck Treaec
The db shotgun in the Wii version of cod waw doesn't eject rifle rounds when fired
On the M1919A1 you can see that they covered part of the barrel with cloth in order to be able to hold it
4:18 The thompson can use drum mags.
M1928 can but not the m1a1
5:39 if you dont see the barrel has a protection that Will not heat their hands
Yeah, that cloth isn't doing a lot. After 50 rounds, it'd catch on fire. Not even joking, it would literally start a fire. US troops did carry them around like that, but it wasn't meant to be used with a hand around the barrel and the cloth would be ditched in a prolonged firefight.
the P-38 did not had a push butene mag release by the trigger that let the mag drop freely. like the M1911, and TT-33 have. the p38 has what is called a Heel type release underneath the grip. meaning you would have to use yore other hand to strip the mag out.
0:55 *angry M4sked noises*
the m1919 looks to have a cover on the barrel so your not touching the barrel
The flamethrower if had that detail would be slightly op in zombies and multiplayer
sich blue monday clip using the m1 garand ping
4:20 the m1928 drum mags can hold 50 rounds of .45 acp.
Yes but for some reason in game it only holds 40 rounds. Also it's the M1A1 as opposed to the M1928A1
Even now it’s still a good game
the double barrel ejection shells.... never noticed it lol
Talking about PTRS: "Length and weight is too much for a single soldier to hipfire"
*insert clip of Chad Russian soldier shouldering and firing PTRS*
You can also see a spring inside the MP40 which is incorrect, the MP40 has a unique return spring system where the spring is captive inside a telescoping assembly for better reliability
Better than vanguard
But
Every WW2 cod game got it's mg42 flaws
Cod waw: locked belt
Cod WW2:low fire rate
But cod vanguard got these errors right
The PING compilation got me like: 2:21
5:46 During reload the entire belt dissapears while its not innacutate belts just dont disappear on thier own
he’s holding the m1919 by the barrel because there is wrap on it
A wrap doesn't do shit because barrels get very hot and would burn through it
@@pyramid_he4d skill issue
@@BadBabyB0i how's that a skill issue