*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/FnavwQg5WwkNkS6r8 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/V9QMsPqoZpU/видео.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/menlWCZI8nA/видео.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/xVbPr6brT1g/видео.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/hYP0FYOBM8M/видео.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/IVLepTYeuaY/видео.html
There’s a big difference between break(present tense of broke) and brake(what is used to stop a vehicle). I only commented because more than once the incorrect word was used.
7:10 "hits the brakes for almost no reason." Are we supposed to pretend that we can't see the truck right on top of the red car when the cammer pulls onto the grass? 🤔
7:07. After cammer is off the road, you can see that there is a slow long line of vehicles immediately ahead of the black truck. The black truck did nothing wrong. The black truck did not do any brake checking. The footage shows how if cammer would have rear-ended black truck, it would have been 100% fault of cammer.
@@bobinthewest8559 That's part of the "following time" rule. The *_average_* person reacts in about 1 second, give or take a millisecond or two. When you have *_LESS THAN_* one second following time, there's NO WAY you can react fast enough. That's why he appeared to wait too long to react, because it was a *_realistic_* reaction time. The reason he had to swerve, is because it takes a particular distance at a particular speed to stop once you've reacted. Depending on how good your brakes are, that's 1 to 2 seconds, making the combined *_MINIMUM_* safe following time *_2_* seconds. This guy gave himself about 3/4 of ONE second to stop. No matter HOW good his brakes were, he wasn't going to be ABLE to stop in time. *_ANY_* factor that reduces stopping, being tired, having a conversation, weak breaks, bald tires, weather, adds at least 1 second more that you need to stop.
4:00 what in the world was the cammer doing by driving on the shoulder way before the intersection, especially when someone was turning out of that entrance.
At 3:53, you can see that is a right turn only lane for the driveway the other car was coming out of. at the end of the clip, you can see the turn only lane ends and starts up, again just after the driveway. Either way you look at it, the cammer is in the wrong.
Yep Cammer wrong, but the unsafe left turn will be found at fault. Maybe it will be 50/50. that's a sucky one. Trying to teach my kids, not everyone drives consistently. this is perfect example.
@milanlatona7363 Its a wide shoulder to allow for street parking for those private residences, not a right turn. Your "dashed lines" is simply just a gap to whatever entrance that is. For a lane, you need 2 lines. Look at the actual right turn lane up the road. There's 2 white lines, there's only one where the cammer is. Either way, there's even less reason for the cammer to be there, given its a shoulder then a turn lane.
It was so ridiculous that I figured it might be an incorrect description. But no, it fits right with the route/location he described (39.274982, -77.320560)
7:08 Cammer, are you an npc? Because the reason why he braked is very, extremely, comically, painfully obvious. Consider opening your eyes once in a while.
The black truck actually helped him lol, he tried moving over to the left to avoid a potential accident if he couldn't stop, and then when cammer swerved he got out of the way.
7:19 the long line of cars in front of the truck shows there was a reason. If you were not speeding and not tailgating, then the only not left was you were not paying attention
7:15 - You had almost 6 seconds of them with brake lights on before you even considered slowing down or attempting to stop. The "almost no reason" the person in front of you stopped was the line of stopped traffic in front them. You'd know this, had you been paying attention. Or not had your head up your own ass.
This is an old clip that I saw on another channel quite a while ago. It dominated the comments section there too 😂😂😂 To paraphrase another commenter here: “The reason was very, extremely, comically, painfully, obvious.” 😂😂😂
3:56 - #14. The cammer moved prematurely into a turn lane for the gas station when they intended to turn at the road beyond it. It is completely reasonable that the car pulled out assuming they were turning into the station. I would have waited to be sure because I don't trust people, but the cammer made a stupid move.
I get people who honk at me, because I do not trust their blinker and wait for them to actually turn. This annoys people behind me, but it has saved me a few times.
You're driving along with the flow of traffic and your phone alerts, either a call or text. What do you do? You wait, you don't put it in your hand, you wait until you're off the road and stopped. You can always call them back. Because of your ability to wait until safely parked, you have earned the 'common sense' award and are smarter than 80% of other drivers. Congrats.
Push a button on the steering wheel to answer the call. Or tap reply on the infotainment, dictate a short "okay sounds good" or whatever fits, that the car writes and sends the text itself.
3:30 - seemed like that one was almost completely avoidable. Plenty of time to slow/stop before the icy/slushy part of the block started - didn't seem to be any attempt.
I think their realization and reaction occurred right about at the start of that section… and not much room to do anything OTHER THAN brake. So I would say, the biggest mistake (on the cammer’s part) was not driving much slower on the narrow residential street in the first place. The driver pulling out is still a tool though.
@@bobinthewest8559 The driver pulling out is already doing so before the cammer even completes the turn. I don't know why they paused, maybe spinning a tire. I don't see how you can blame them for starting to pull out when there was no traffic at all and then the cammer comes barreling along obliviously. The pause certainly didn't help the cammer recognize what was in front of them so you can't be too hard on them either.
#7 - the insurance company will _not_ give you enough $ to replace your vehicle; however, get an attorney. The insurance company will try and settle or value of the car and medical bills. DO NOT SETTLE. Mainly posting this for anyone who reads this.
Also never say you are okay after a collision, even a minor one, as bruising isn't always obvious until later. The same with concussion. (I speak from, painful, experience).
Prove that they were on their phone. Just because something happened doesn't mean that they were on their phone, like you all ways state. Any of a number of things could have caused it.
@@Freewheeler40… You’re right… Foolish to make assumptions about what the cammer WAS doing… But I think we can all agree about what he was NOT doing 😂😂😂
The driver should not be using cruise control during a ramp transition. I suspect the cruise control was made up excuse for over correction. Careless driving altogether.
You can always spot the utter BS in someones story because they want to deflect from the obvious truth. Travelling too fast for conditions, braked harder than was necessary and then braked even harder as the car barrelled into the barrier...
I agree, to me the cammer is wrong here. The white car was already out of the parking sport before the cammer even turned. You see danger, slow down ffs
Clip 14 @ 3:57 Why the heck was the cammer *driving fully on the shoulder* & likely with a right-hand turn signal judging by the response of the other driver? The *next* right turn lane doesn't even legally exist until after the other driver outright. 🤷🤷♂🤷♀
1:59 - Shout out to owning one's issues and doing better in the future. 7:22 - You may not have been speeding or tailgating, but you certainly weren't paying attention like you should've.
That, along with the all-too-common "there/their/they're" and "your/you're" misapplications (not that I remember seeing any in this particular video), yes.
#27 time 8:35, Danzig - Mother playing with the line "Do you wanna bang heads with me?" Just at the right time when that car smashed the front of your truck in.
3:54 … Why would you start taking the shoulder if you’re not turning? Yes… I understand that the person waiting to pull out should wait until the cammer commits to a turn before pulling out, but… just, why? There is zero benefit… and, as this clip shows… it creates unnecessary confusion and risk.
7:00 that's why i use the button on the steering wheel to disengage the cruise, or just enough of a tap on the brake to trigger the lights which is enough to disengage cruise.
@@KCFlyer2 1 its local streets so they wasn’t driving that fast to begin with. 2 the suv sped up way to aggressively for that super slow aimless idiot of a driver. 3 which leads back to him being lucky that another wasn’t ahead when sped up like that. 4 even if they hit the damage would’ve been minor
@@heyyouthere39 I think that to an insurance company, damage is damage. Rates would go up. I typically don't expect someone to turn from a farther out lane. There was no damage. It was pretty heads up.
7:14 = Almost no reason. Sure, he could have crashed into the cars so that you don't have to crash into him, because you kept the perfect distance. The definition of not tailgating is ofcourse keeping a distance, where you completely crash into the car before you, once he brakes a little bit. You totally nailed it!
#23 There is a red car in front of that truck. If the red car slows down, that truck is going to hit the brakes. By the time you can see the red car it might have already increased speed. In that specific kind of situation it's a good idea to leave yourself extra space in front of you. You have nowhere to go on the left due to the guardrail, and nowhere to go on the right due to the semi.
@@spamlessaccount He was in front of cammer just before they reached the end of the turn lane, so he was expecting cammer to let him go in front. Unfortunately for him, cammer's attention was likely aimed at the left like a good driver. You're supposed to be looking at where you intend to go to make sure it's safe. So more than likely cammer never even saw the motorcycle until he was mid-turn. Dumb move by the motorcyclist.
@@spamlessaccount I will be honest with you. I don't know if they are allowed to make that specific maneuver. However, we don't have the rear view to give the whole picture either. I do know that motorcycles are allowed to filter/split in all of cuckafornia. The exact specifics, I don't know. I don't speak cuckafornian. Every video that I see motorists complaining about motorcycles splitting traffic is USUALLY the fault of the driver of the vehicle that has to yield to the motorcycle.
6:47 Cruise control is used only in good weather with dry roads -- never in inclement weather with wet/snowy/icy roads since the vehicle will react adversely to slipping traction. Then you crash and die.
I learned from this video. I totally could see myself tapping my brakes to disengage my cruise control. With hope, never again. I did not know tapping could lead to all that hydroplaning.
@@tarico4436 Had to learn this as well (re: tapping brakes). Forced myself into habit of using switch on steering column control arm to disengage CC under normal conditions (obviously have to brake before anything else in emergencies).
5:30..he was merging okay...could have been a little faster, but letting off the gas would have allowed him in. Honking on the other hand scared him and he hit his brakes.
The cammer at 7:10 needs to grow up and accept that he miscalculated. I have made many mistakes over the years driving as well, but I never place the blame on someone else. This victim mentality thing is getting out of hand.
The cammer had a reason to be in that lane - if you look down at their right front-side mirror, you can see they are actually still in the process of overtaking another semi in the right lane. Person hauling the boat is another story.
I wouldn’t say that about all bikers, but that one certainly was. Especially with the indignant glance, as if the cammer was doing something wrong or absurd.
Lane splitting is legal for motorcycles in California. So the biker coming up beside cammer when the lane is stopped or moving slowly isn't strictly illegal. The biker was an idiot for trying to pass cammer on a left turn, when cammer's eyes would've been pointed left making it highly likely he'd miss a motorcycle on the right. He should've slipped in behind cammer while the lane was still straight. Then passed him on the on ramp.
#10 2:55 Mega Driving Scoool made the comment "The driver should also pay attention to when the signal light just turns green..." What a stupid comment 🤯🥸. The light was green for a full 5 seconds before the car in the right lane enter the intersection. What do you expect he should do? Should we always make a stop at the green light after it is green for 5 seconds in case a pedestrian happens to be there ??? Sometimes comments from MDS are just plainly stupid...
That was a huge overreaction, what are you talking about? Dude made a full left turn onto another road to avoid the other car that barely moved into their lane 😂
@@Semystic That's 20/20 hindsight. You know the white minivan stopped only partly in the left lane, because that's where it stopped. At the moment it happened, the SUV had no way of knowing if the minivan would stop, or continue with its left turn.
@@spamlessaccount… I think they tromped on the brakes honestly, after hooking the turn. Zero contact from what I can tell. I wouldn’t beat that driver up based on their reaction. All in all, I’d say decent defensive maneuver.
2:01 Not only did the person turning left fail to yield, they also cut their turn too short. This driver found out the hard way not to blindly pull out.
#21 6:26 Pontiac was signaling right before the collision. My hunch is he was checking his right mirror and shoulder, which would explain why he didn't slow down for the pickup that turned in front of him. Pickup is at fault for an unsafe left turn. But this is why you're not supposed to change lanes in or just before an intersection.
The signal was on, but the car was still maintaining its lane. Maybe they put the signal on, intending to switch lanes after crossing the intersection 🤷♂️
@4:12--The White car was on the main highway, curving to the left with NO Stop Sign. The Black car didn't stop. Note the Green sign in front showing 2 directions of travel. Black car's fault.
3:58 you probably had your blinker on but you crossed the solid white line and were intent on crossing it two more times to turn where the white line actually curves making a turn lane. You are at fault cammer.
@@Tomcatt817it wasn't a turn lane. That was the shoulder. After the crash you can see the turn lane up ahead in the road. If there was a turn lane for that particular entrance then there would have been a curve in the white line with the addition of the second white line to the left, essentially a gap in the solid white line, to make it a turn lane.
@@BLUELEADER78 At the very start of the clip, you can see the painted shoulder line angle in to the curb right when the second lane line starts. Just after the gas station drive, you can see the painted shoulder bulge out, and then angle back to the curb for the start of the next turn lane, which also has a second white lane line that starts.. The first one is only visible at the very start of the clip.
@Tomcatt817 The break in the line is in front of a large driveway with a wooden gate. There is no turn lane there. If there were a turn lane, it would not have started where the large driveway is. The curve in the white line is an exit acceleration lane for exiting customers. Had there been a turn lane at the start of the clip, then there would have been a similar curve at the start of the clip, but there isn't one.
@@BLUELEADER78 It is hard to tell on that, as the clip starts too late to see, but you can see it, where the shoulder line does go to the curb. Go to the end of the preceding clip and then start stop, start stop, and just as the new clip starts, you can see the line drive to the curb, and the new line to the left start at the point where the old line meets the curb.
4:00. cammer was 100% in the wrong for that. I hate right turns like this that have extended exits. Obviously you can see the lane end and start again and the cammer prematurely go over into the lane. I'm always extra cautious on roads like this and don't turn out until I physically see the car making the proper right turn. I also, if I'm the one turning right, do NOT turn on my blinker until the moment when I intend on turning right.
8:26 common misconception of 4WD owners. 4WD does not mean you can drive like you're on dry pavement. Also 4WD does not mean 4W stop. A lesson that cost you $700. Was it worth it?
His description said something about “back end kicked out as I came around the corner…”, but I didn’t see any indication of any corner in the video. I’m thinking he was driving straight, and simply got a little too heavy on the throttle, which he MIGHT have been able to control if he had the 4WD engaged (provided of course that he reacted appropriately)
@spamlessaccount that's my point. 4WD wouldn't have made any difference when you're driving too fast for conditions. Cammer wrongly blames not being in 4WD as the cause of the crash.
Seeing how this is MDS, it wouldn't surprise me if the caption for the clip at 7:10 is for another video. If it is the correct caption, then the cammer is a total idiot for not seeing the line of cars in front of the truck. I'm betting the cammer is the total idiot.
For what it’s worth, I’ve seen this clip on several other channels with the same caption. It dominates the comments section on every channel, because YES… the cammer is a fugnugget 😂😂😂
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/FnavwQg5WwkNkS6r8
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/V9QMsPqoZpU/видео.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/menlWCZI8nA/видео.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/xVbPr6brT1g/видео.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/hYP0FYOBM8M/видео.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/IVLepTYeuaY/видео.html
There’s a big difference between break(present tense of broke) and brake(what is used to stop a vehicle). I only commented because more than once the incorrect word was used.
7:10 "hits the brakes for almost no reason." Are we supposed to pretend that we can't see the truck right on top of the red car when the cammer pulls onto the grass? 🤔
Exactly
This…. Maybe cammer is blind?
He's a cammer...they dont do anything wrong when it comes to driving!
He's either blind, stupid, or maybe both🤣
7:07. After cammer is off the road, you can see that there is a slow long line of vehicles immediately ahead of the black truck. The black truck did nothing wrong. The black truck did not do any brake checking. The footage shows how if cammer would have rear-ended black truck, it would have been 100% fault of cammer.
Worse he claims he isn't tailgating with LESS THAN 1 SECOND following distance.
He had “enough” time to easily slow/stop without incident if he just hadn’t delayed his reaction.
He was “almost there” by the time he began to react.
Protip for cammer: If you can't stop in time when the vehicle in front of you suddenly brakes, that is the very definition of tailgating.
@@bobinthewest8559
That's part of the "following time" rule.
The *_average_* person reacts in about 1 second, give or take a millisecond or two. When you have *_LESS THAN_* one second following time, there's NO WAY you can react fast enough. That's why he appeared to wait too long to react, because it was a *_realistic_* reaction time.
The reason he had to swerve, is because it takes a particular distance at a particular speed to stop once you've reacted. Depending on how good your brakes are, that's 1 to 2 seconds, making the combined *_MINIMUM_* safe following time *_2_* seconds.
This guy gave himself about 3/4 of ONE second to stop. No matter HOW good his brakes were, he wasn't going to be ABLE to stop in time.
*_ANY_* factor that reduces stopping, being tired, having a conversation, weak breaks, bald tires, weather, adds at least 1 second more that you need to stop.
@@solandri69 Eggsactly.
7:14 Breaks for almost no reason? Open your eyes and you'll see the reason!
7:08 The guy in front hit his BRAKES for almost no reason? Persecution complex much? He hit his BRAKES because everyone else was stopping.
4:00 what in the world was the cammer doing by driving on the shoulder way before the intersection, especially when someone was turning out of that entrance.
At 3:53, you can see that is a right turn only lane for the driveway the other car was coming out of. at the end of the clip, you can see the turn only lane ends and starts up, again just after the driveway. Either way you look at it, the cammer is in the wrong.
Cammer is wrong … car that pulled out will probably be found at fault because they pulled out before it was safe to do so.
Yep Cammer wrong, but the unsafe left turn will be found at fault. Maybe it will be 50/50. that's a sucky one. Trying to teach my kids, not everyone drives consistently. this is perfect example.
@milanlatona7363 Its a wide shoulder to allow for street parking for those private residences, not a right turn. Your "dashed lines" is simply just a gap to whatever entrance that is. For a lane, you need 2 lines. Look at the actual right turn lane up the road. There's 2 white lines, there's only one where the cammer is.
Either way, there's even less reason for the cammer to be there, given its a shoulder then a turn lane.
EEEEEXACTLY!
7:18 I see 6 *very* good reasons directly in front of the pickup.
It was so ridiculous that I figured it might be an incorrect description. But no, it fits right with the route/location he described (39.274982, -77.320560)
7:08 You´rer wrong. The truck braked because the traffic in front of him was slowing down and he was observant. You should try it too.
7:08 Cammer, are you an npc? Because the reason why he braked is very, extremely, comically, painfully obvious. Consider opening your eyes once in a while.
“… very, extremely, comically, painfully…”
lol… love it 😂😂😂
How do some people go through life with their heads up a certain body cavity? That’s gotta be uncomfortable.
The black truck actually helped him lol, he tried moving over to the left to avoid a potential accident if he couldn't stop, and then when cammer swerved he got out of the way.
@@mdf3530 Yep a lot of people need to get their heads out of their azzes, as well as out of their phones.
I love your comment
7:19 the long line of cars in front of the truck shows there was a reason. If you were not speeding and not tailgating, then the only not left was you were not paying attention
7:10 - That "almost" is doing a _lot_ of heavy lifting in that sentence.
I wanted to jump on that "almost" too.
I can’t speak for everyone, but… the reason I put on my brakes is usually to avoid plowing into the vehicle in front of me.
7:15 - You had almost 6 seconds of them with brake lights on before you even considered slowing down or attempting to stop. The "almost no reason" the person in front of you stopped was the line of stopped traffic in front them. You'd know this, had you been paying attention. Or not had your head up your own ass.
Well, he has to keep his ears warm somehow.
😂
This is an old clip that I saw on another channel quite a while ago.
It dominated the comments section there too 😂😂😂
To paraphrase another commenter here:
“The reason was very, extremely, comically, painfully, obvious.”
😂😂😂
@@bobinthewest8559Repeating exactly what someone else said or wrote is quoting not paraphrasing.
3:56 - #14. The cammer moved prematurely into a turn lane for the gas station when they intended to turn at the road beyond it. It is completely reasonable that the car pulled out assuming they were turning into the station. I would have waited to be sure because I don't trust people, but the cammer made a stupid move.
I get people who honk at me, because I do not trust their blinker and wait for them to actually turn. This annoys people behind me, but it has saved me a few times.
Wasn't even a turn lane either, that's just a wide shoulder.
@@95mushroom I think you’re right.
@@Tomcatt817 Trust but verify.
@@thechapLen I mean either way, being a shoulder would mean even less reason for the cammer to be there, and incentive for the other car to go.
You're driving along with the flow of traffic and your phone alerts, either a call or text. What do you do? You wait, you don't put it in your hand, you wait until you're off the road and stopped. You can always call them back. Because of your ability to wait until safely parked, you have earned the 'common sense' award and are smarter than 80% of other drivers. Congrats.
Push a button on the steering wheel to answer the call. Or tap reply on the infotainment, dictate a short "okay sounds good" or whatever fits, that the car writes and sends the text itself.
3:32 #12 you clearly see the front end of the car sticking out and you didn't even slow up to avoid it?
To me it looks like he actually sped up!
@@SDB1901 Gotta get that RUclips content.
3:30 - seemed like that one was almost completely avoidable. Plenty of time to slow/stop before the icy/slushy part of the block started - didn't seem to be any attempt.
I think their realization and reaction occurred right about at the start of that section… and not much room to do anything OTHER THAN brake.
So I would say, the biggest mistake (on the cammer’s part) was not driving much slower on the narrow residential street in the first place.
The driver pulling out is still a tool though.
@@bobinthewest8559 The driver pulling out is already doing so before the cammer even completes the turn. I don't know why they paused, maybe spinning a tire. I don't see how you can blame them for starting to pull out when there was no traffic at all and then the cammer comes barreling along obliviously. The pause certainly didn't help the cammer recognize what was in front of them so you can't be too hard on them either.
7:08 "almost no reason" Well I guess they could have rear-ended those vehicles in front of them. As for you... pay more attention.
5:10 - Motorcycle will never win the brake check war against a car, I promise.
#14 this is why i don't trust blinkers, even if someone is in a turn only lane.
I'm amazed about all of the breaking...
There’s often a lot of breaking when you don’t use enough braking 😏
#7 - the insurance company will _not_ give you enough $ to replace your vehicle; however, get an attorney. The insurance company will try and settle or value of the car and medical bills. DO NOT SETTLE. Mainly posting this for anyone who reads this.
Thanks. We thought you posted it for those who *didn't* read it.
Also never say you are okay after a collision, even a minor one, as bruising isn't always obvious until later. The same with concussion. (I speak from, painful, experience).
@@pazuzu7119 lol, smarta$$ :)
7:08 truck braking cammer looking down at his phone
Prove that they were on their phone. Just because something happened doesn't mean that they were on their phone, like you all ways state. Any of a number of things could have caused it.
@@Freewheeler40…
You’re right…
Foolish to make assumptions about what the cammer WAS doing…
But I think we can all agree about what he was NOT doing 😂😂😂
@@bobinthewest8559 absolutely
7:00 - "I was driving too fast for conditions and lost control. I also don't know the difference between 'break' and 'brake'."
give him a brake....he was driving a kia soul (self admitted) and he loved it! He probably talks with a lisp and dances thru life
@@jjenes1 Looks like a 'she' to me but, who knows.
The driver should not be using cruise control during a ramp transition. I suspect the cruise control was made up excuse for over correction. Careless driving altogether.
@@kousterx driver also doesnt know there is a button to pause/disengage cruise, no need to 'tap' brakes
You can always spot the utter BS in someones story because they want to deflect from the obvious truth. Travelling too fast for conditions, braked harder than was necessary and then braked even harder as the car barrelled into the barrier...
#12
Why does the cammer speed up to beat the car on a snowy road?
I agree, to me the cammer is wrong here. The white car was already out of the parking sport before the cammer even turned.
You see danger, slow down ffs
Because cammer had to insert his tiny member into the equation so he wouldn't have someone else in front of him. Insurance should cancel that guy
6:53 You've got to learn how to turn off your cruise control without braking. Its a good thing to know especially in bad weather 🙂
5:38 A perfect example of why not to honk.
#20 Those parked trucks were going really fast, and then a dumpster jumped out of nowhere, there was nothing I could do.
I almost wondered if that driver was having a “hissy quit” 🤦♂️
2:56 blaming the Infiniti here is a little wild, just me?
7:16 Brake check for "no" reason... ??? Were you blind to the line of cars in front of that truck?
Cammer’s fault. That was not a lane! 3:54
8:08 There is NO defense for the driver of the Malibu, he was in the wrong lane and made no effort to safely change lanes.
2:22 is entirely the fault of the turning sedan illegally using the turn around in the median.
Yup… and how much you wanna bet they just drove off ignoring the carnage they just caused?
#2---love that trucker!
#2 That was sweet 😂👌🏼
Clip 14 @ 3:57 Why the heck was the cammer *driving fully on the shoulder* & likely with a right-hand turn signal judging by the response of the other driver? The *next* right turn lane doesn't even legally exist until after the other driver outright. 🤷🤷♂🤷♀
Not a shoulder - right turn lane - which ended at that entrance.
1:59 - Shout out to owning one's issues and doing better in the future.
7:22 - You may not have been speeding or tailgating, but you certainly weren't paying attention like you should've.
8:40 Wow that really smashed up both cars. Glad you're all ok.
I don't think a single person wrote "brake/brakes/braking" correctly on any one of these videos. It's an indictment of our education system, frankly.
That, along with the all-too-common "there/their/they're" and "your/you're" misapplications (not that I remember seeing any in this particular video), yes.
7:05 I dont even know what to say about that
#27 time 8:35, Danzig - Mother playing with the line "Do you wanna bang heads with me?" Just at the right time when that car smashed the front of your truck in.
3:54 …
Why would you start taking the shoulder if you’re not turning?
Yes… I understand that the person waiting to pull out should wait until the cammer commits to a turn before pulling out, but… just, why?
There is zero benefit… and, as this clip shows… it creates unnecessary confusion and risk.
1:45 Prophetic graffiti is prophetic.
Profound statements are profound.
8:09 there is no defending the actions of that Malibu driver.
But thank goodness they at least didn’t miss their turn 😂😂😂
But they drive a Malubi 😂
Sure there is that was the last flight outta Saigon and they didn't wanna miss it.
I don’t even think that’s a Malibu, I think that’s an impala.
@@mdf3530
When it's a good joke, but only one other person in the room gets it
Your blinker does not give you the right of way
"Brake lights don't give you permission to stop" - same logic. They're warning lights. They are in no way asking anyone's permission.
#10 this is why pedestrians should use crosswalks
6:11 …
Too many questions here.
Summary:
Dude, WTF?
It's like they're trying to cause accidents.
4:16 lol rolled the stop sign , brain dies at the intersection then reboots
1:01 lady really said oof
3:00 damn, those are some great breaks and tries to stop that fast on cold & wet asphalt.
BRAKES, dude, BRAKES. Don't you ever read the comments on this channel to see how many times people are chided for confusing "breaks" for "brakes"?
7:00 that's why i use the button on the steering wheel to disengage the cruise, or just enough of a tap on the brake to trigger the lights which is enough to disengage cruise.
Or don't use cruise in the rain.
And definitely disengage well before entering an exit/entrance ramp.
Dang! I felt #7 as they crashed!
Next time, tap the brake so you dont break
6:42 T-boned? Not even close! The car barely hit the rear.
Yeah, it was more like an L-bone lol
3:52 Damn that panic turn. Super lucky he ain’t hit another car
I'd say that panic turn saved an accident.
@@KCFlyer2 1 its local streets so they wasn’t driving that fast to begin with. 2 the suv sped up way to aggressively for that super slow aimless idiot of a driver. 3 which leads back to him being lucky that another wasn’t ahead when sped up like that. 4 even if they hit the damage would’ve been minor
@@heyyouthere39 I think that to an insurance company, damage is damage. Rates would go up. I typically don't expect someone to turn from a farther out lane. There was no damage. It was pretty heads up.
7:14 = Almost no reason. Sure, he could have crashed into the cars so that you don't have to crash into him, because you kept the perfect distance. The definition of not tailgating is ofcourse keeping a distance, where you completely crash into the car before you, once he brakes a little bit. You totally nailed it!
#20 must be a swift driver
That looked to me a little like a “hissy quit” 😂😂😂
#23 There is a red car in front of that truck. If the red car slows down, that truck is going to hit the brakes. By the time you can see the red car it might have already increased speed. In that specific kind of situation it's a good idea to leave yourself extra space in front of you. You have nowhere to go on the left due to the guardrail, and nowhere to go on the right due to the semi.
3:54 illegal to keep going straight there cammers fault
"What is the most confusing thing I can do to trick this other guy into getting into an accident with me?"
4:57 Hey Alex, motorcycles are ALLOWED to lane split and lane filter to the front...whether you like it or not.
your blanket statement is not true, only some places allow that
@@rogerw-interested That is in cuckafornia. The allow lane splitting and lane filtering...in the WHOLE state.👍
@@edgeofentropy3492 filtering is one thing. Creating their own turn lane is another.
@@spamlessaccount He was in front of cammer just before they reached the end of the turn lane, so he was expecting cammer to let him go in front. Unfortunately for him, cammer's attention was likely aimed at the left like a good driver. You're supposed to be looking at where you intend to go to make sure it's safe. So more than likely cammer never even saw the motorcycle until he was mid-turn. Dumb move by the motorcyclist.
@@spamlessaccount I will be honest with you. I don't know if they are allowed to make that specific maneuver. However, we don't have the rear view to give the whole picture either. I do know that motorcycles are allowed to filter/split in all of cuckafornia. The exact specifics, I don't know. I don't speak cuckafornian. Every video that I see motorists complaining about motorcycles splitting traffic is USUALLY the fault of the driver of the vehicle that has to yield to the motorcycle.
6:12 How fast was that dumpster going when it hit you?
Great video!
6:55 i never use the brake to disengage cruise control. the cancel button is here for a reason !
7:58 that general strip from utsa blvd to da zevala is a nightmare.
That Malibu is not the first, judging by all the skid marks right there 😂😂😂
6:47 Cruise control is used only in good weather with dry roads -- never in inclement weather with wet/snowy/icy roads since the vehicle will react adversely to slipping traction. Then you crash and die.
I learned from this video. I totally could see myself tapping my brakes to disengage my cruise control. With hope, never again. I did not know tapping could lead to all that hydroplaning.
@@tarico4436 Had to learn this as well (re: tapping brakes). Forced myself into habit of using switch on steering column control arm to disengage CC under normal conditions (obviously have to brake before anything else in emergencies).
@@Sn0trocket Thank you. I will now do same same.
1:50 Holy 💩, dude. I was 100% positive you were gonna hit that car. That must've been less than a foot, lol.
3:38 lol why did you speed up?
5:30..he was merging okay...could have been a little faster, but letting off the gas would have allowed him in. Honking on the other hand scared him and he hit his brakes.
If I'm in the cammer's position, I'm trying to leave the merging driver space to make a safe merge, if I can't move over to the left.
0:54 "Car used the turning lane" Yeah for turning left - SUV then moved right - right into the Coke truck.
The guy braked because traffic had stopped. Look at your video
The cammer at 7:10 needs to grow up and accept that he miscalculated. I have made many mistakes over the years driving as well, but I never place the blame on someone else. This victim mentality thing is getting out of hand.
Anyone else jump at # 29?
2:19. Add to the never-ending list of “things that wouldn’t have happened without left lane camping.”
The cammer had a reason to be in that lane - if you look down at their right front-side mirror, you can see they are actually still in the process of overtaking another semi in the right lane. Person hauling the boat is another story.
Look closely. In front of the truck hauling the boat, some idiot is trying to do a u turn. That's what caused this accident.
@@Sn0trocket shhh...don't try logic on the one-trick ponies.
yeah, that interchange in the first clip is notorious for people just cutting over the double solid lines.
5:00 bikers are such tools
I wouldn’t say that about all bikers, but that one certainly was. Especially with the indignant glance, as if the cammer was doing something wrong or absurd.
Lane splitting is legal for motorcycles in California. So the biker coming up beside cammer when the lane is stopped or moving slowly isn't strictly illegal.
The biker was an idiot for trying to pass cammer on a left turn, when cammer's eyes would've been pointed left making it highly likely he'd miss a motorcycle on the right. He should've slipped in behind cammer while the lane was still straight. Then passed him on the on ramp.
Don't think I've ever seen a green Walmart sign (1:06) before!
"Neighborhood Market"
#10 2:55 Mega Driving Scoool made the comment "The driver should also pay attention to when the signal light just turns green..." What a stupid comment 🤯🥸. The light was green for a full 5 seconds before the car in the right lane enter the intersection. What do you expect he should do? Should we always make a stop at the green light after it is green for 5 seconds in case a pedestrian happens to be there ??? Sometimes comments from MDS are just plainly stupid...
3:32 The SUV will have fault, but they were already pulling out when the cammer made their turn and the cammer just drove straight into them.
Great way to make friends with your neighbors… taking out 2, maybe 3 cars just because you drive like a fugnugget 😂😂😂😂😂
7:48 that's not a tire, that's a rubber band.
1:04 “Have a Coke and a smile and shut the f$@kup!”
3:50 - Moving out of the way to avoid getting hit by a moron can hardly be classified as an "overreaction".
But tromping on the gas in a turn and almost hitting a parked car is.
That was a huge overreaction, what are you talking about? Dude made a full left turn onto another road to avoid the other car that barely moved into their lane 😂
@@Semystic That's 20/20 hindsight. You know the white minivan stopped only partly in the left lane, because that's where it stopped. At the moment it happened, the SUV had no way of knowing if the minivan would stop, or continue with its left turn.
@@spamlessaccount…
I think they tromped on the brakes honestly, after hooking the turn.
Zero contact from what I can tell.
I wouldn’t beat that driver up based on their reaction. All in all, I’d say decent defensive maneuver.
2:01 Not only did the person turning left fail to yield, they also cut their turn too short. This driver found out the hard way not to blindly pull out.
Good morning y’all Happy Monday # 1 😄
4:06 cammers fault
#23 Nick.... if you actually watch your video you see an entire line of cars ahead of the truck....YTA because you weren't paying attention.
7:19 😂😂 no wonder everyone is going off on Nick! Clearly everyone is paying attention but him.
#14
You let the naan distract you.
#23
Nick, you just showed us a textbook example why you always scan 2 to 3 cars ahead of you.
#21 6:26 Pontiac was signaling right before the collision. My hunch is he was checking his right mirror and shoulder, which would explain why he didn't slow down for the pickup that turned in front of him. Pickup is at fault for an unsafe left turn. But this is why you're not supposed to change lanes in or just before an intersection.
The signal was on, but the car was still maintaining its lane. Maybe they put the signal on, intending to switch lanes after crossing the intersection 🤷♂️
@4:12--The White car was on the main highway, curving to the left with NO Stop Sign. The Black car didn't stop. Note the Green sign in front showing 2 directions of travel.
Black car's fault.
3:58 you probably had your blinker on but you crossed the solid white line and were intent on crossing it two more times to turn where the white line actually curves making a turn lane.
You are at fault cammer.
That was actually a turn only lane for the entrance the car pulled out of, but the cammer decided to go straight, so yes cammer fault
@@Tomcatt817it wasn't a turn lane. That was the shoulder. After the crash you can see the turn lane up ahead in the road. If there was a turn lane for that particular entrance then there would have been a curve in the white line with the addition of the second white line to the left, essentially a gap in the solid white line, to make it a turn lane.
@@BLUELEADER78 At the very start of the clip, you can see the painted shoulder line angle in to the curb right when the second lane line starts. Just after the gas station drive, you can see the painted shoulder bulge out, and then angle back to the curb for the start of the next turn lane, which also has a second white lane line that starts.. The first one is only visible at the very start of the clip.
@Tomcatt817 The break in the line is in front of a large driveway with a wooden gate. There is no turn lane there. If there were a turn lane, it would not have started where the large driveway is. The curve in the white line is an exit acceleration lane for exiting customers. Had there been a turn lane at the start of the clip, then there would have been a similar curve at the start of the clip, but there isn't one.
@@BLUELEADER78 It is hard to tell on that, as the clip starts too late to see, but you can see it, where the shoulder line does go to the curb. Go to the end of the preceding clip and then start stop, start stop, and just as the new clip starts, you can see the line drive to the curb, and the new line to the left start at the point where the old line meets the curb.
8:55 pulled a Claude. My stepdad has a habit of doing that.
6:47 Somebody need to explain to this cammer what the term T-Boned means. T is right in the word.
6:59 You know words like transitioning and disengage but don't know the difference between break and brake. SMH
8:02. Why are you honking? Horns aren’t there as some sort of voting mechanism to show disapproval.
I often wonder if some people believe that it’s a rewind button 😂😂😂
4:00. cammer was 100% in the wrong for that. I hate right turns like this that have extended exits. Obviously you can see the lane end and start again and the cammer prematurely go over into the lane. I'm always extra cautious on roads like this and don't turn out until I physically see the car making the proper right turn. I also, if I'm the one turning right, do NOT turn on my blinker until the moment when I intend on turning right.
Yes the turn lane ends and re-starts, but you can't see that when the turn lane ends. Hate those with a passion.
8:26 common misconception of 4WD owners. 4WD does not mean you can drive like you're on dry pavement. Also 4WD does not mean 4W stop. A lesson that cost you $700. Was it worth it?
There was no lesson - he did *NOT* have it in 4WD.
His description said something about “back end kicked out as I came around the corner…”, but I didn’t see any indication of any corner in the video.
I’m thinking he was driving straight, and simply got a little too heavy on the throttle, which he MIGHT have been able to control if he had the 4WD engaged (provided of course that he reacted appropriately)
@spamlessaccount that's my point. 4WD wouldn't have made any difference when you're driving too fast for conditions. Cammer wrongly blames not being in 4WD as the cause of the crash.
Seeing how this is MDS, it wouldn't surprise me if the caption for the clip at 7:10 is for another video. If it is the correct caption, then the cammer is a total idiot for not seeing the line of cars in front of the truck. I'm betting the cammer is the total idiot.
That's a pretty safe bet considering 99% of cammers are total idiots.
For what it’s worth, I’ve seen this clip on several other channels with the same caption.
It dominates the comments section on every channel, because YES… the cammer is a fugnugget 😂😂😂
7:55 Completely normal failure of an under inflated tire. The sidewall is not meant to drive on.
2:46 OMG WOW