Kodak Tri X 400 (120)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024
- Today we are looking at one of Kodak's oldest black and white film stocks. Join me as I put this film through its paces and give you all the details you need if you are considering grabbing a roll for your next shoot.
Thank you for watching and if you enjoyed this video and want to help the channel please consider subscribing. I'm on a mission to test every film stock under the sun. Stay tuned for the next one....
Instagram: / __blakeinnes__
Email: blakeinnesphotography@gmail.com
I also love 11:53 ! The detail in the shot is really great, and I think the latitude shines with the sky not feeling overbearing, but the shadows of the trees still having detail. Great work!
@@alexwahoski appreciate that dude!! It’s a brilliant film due to its exposure! A scene like that with such a wide dynamic range still turns out awesome 🙌🏻
I absolutely love the grain. I also enjoy pushing this stock.
@@alexxedge it’s a great grain structure! Probably one of the nicer ones I’ve ever seen! Pushing would be fantastic as well!
It's so nice the possibility of use a film that the old photographers used
to click in the old days. Please, Kodak, never kill Tri-x!
@@alexandermoreira2859 surely they would never!! It’s top tier status this one! Glad you also like it!
Another great vid mate! I’m the same I started with hp5 and never looked back. Always wanted to tri-it (🥁) but yeah hp5 has never let me down. You should do a comparison!
@@timothylaw91 it’s good to hear you’ve found a film stock that works a treat!! I’m excited to give this a go now! Also that was the greatest pun I’ve ever heard! I won’t even Tri to beat it…….😅
Bought 36 rolls of this expired for a good deal. One of the better purchases i have ever made- its a 200iso film now since its expired but its still lovely.
@@harrisonfisher7744 that is freakin amazing! Stoked to hear you got a good deal on it! Have you had any of it developed yet?? I’d love to see the results
Yeah I've shot 6 rolls- all home processed. I belive 10 year expired. I will be uploading some of them soon on my lomography page- the username is inchya
@@harrisonfisher7744 excellent I’ll go give you a follow now and I look forward to seeing them!
Recently came back to Tri-X to rekindle my love for it, and to once again try my hand at that classic B&W look and feel. Still working on compositions however, but with the fall weather turning gloomy I’m hopeful! Shooting in bright sunny conditions opened up the possibilities, many thanks for that!!
@@queative Im stoked to hear that! Here is Australia we are kind of stuck with bright sunny conditions regardless of what we want haha
Well done Blake, I love Yamba and Maclean 😍
@@imac3355 thanks heaps! How great is that overall area! A lot of great photo opportunities and just a great place to hang out!
If you're doing B&W photography then you have to do your own developing. It's easy-peasy! Scanning can be done with a good scanner - or phone these days. Inspired by the recent "Civil War" movie, I returned to doing developing and scanning with a simple Kodak cardboard "mobile film scanner" - just some filmography fun 🙂
@@gregb5149 that is awesome! I’m not quite there yet but it’s definitely something I’ll be interested in doing in the future!!
Never tried tri-X as I’ve never had a bad roll of ilford hp5 so I’ve been a brand snob and stayed with that 😅
@@shinjukumasterlord6252 haha hey we like what we like! Once you find a good stock that you learn to use to achieve results you are proud of you should continue to use it! How do you think it compares to these images though?
@@steven3557 consider it added to the ever growing list 🎞️🫡
Very informative!!!
@@StanleyVaughn-xk3wv thank you my friend! I’m glad you took something away from this video!
Aside from the online community Kodak itself has provided information that Tri-X can be underexposed by 1 stop and developed normally especially when using developers like D-76 or XTOL. A excellent resource for this information is the Technical Datasheet for the film. Also you can get very fine grain with Tri-X 400 when processing it in XTOL.
@@michaelcary9467 thank you for this information. This will certainly help others as well as myself when deciding if this film is right for them!
You should try Ilford Delta 400.
@@acmdv I’ll add it to the list right now!!! What format are you thinking?
@@blakeinnesfilmphotography 35mm & 120.
@@acmdv you got it!! Wish me luck
Hi blake, what do you think of ilford HP5+? I get it cheaper here, hence havent shot trix as much
@@riswanc I haven’t had too much time with ilford HP5. A lot of people seem to really enjoy it. I’m looking forward to doing a test video on that film stock to see what it’s all about! Have you had a lot of luck using it??
@@blakeinnesfilmphotography hi blake, hp5+ is my go to film in 135 and 120, as a matter of facts i bulk roll ‘em.. but the reason why i use it it’s because i love the trix snd this hp5 is a similar version from ilford which sells half the price of trix.. been shooting with for years.. but sometimes videos like this, intrigued me to try trix though i know i might get similar results but with more cash😂 may be u should do comparison, love watching ‘em
@@riswanc I really appreciate that! Similar results for half the price is a no brainer my friend!! Keep going with HP5 🤝🎞️
If only Tri X was cheaper, I'd use it far more often if it was below £10 a roll here in 35 consistently and about £10 a roll in 120. currently it's £14 a roll
@@xander1052 yeah the costs are getting up there aren’t they!!! Not sure what that is in Australian dollars but I think everyone is feeling the weight
I keep all my exposed b&w films in the fridge untill I'm (agin) able to develop them and scan / wet print them. To drastically cut the costs, course all that crap is expensive. Just saying...
@@tomislavmiletic_ haha I’m with you there dude!! I’ve got exposed film in the fridge to just sitting because I can’t justify the cost right now! I’m only developing rolls for RUclips currently! Tad on the expensive side isn’t it!