Sony Is Making A New Animated Spider-Man Villain Movie?! | Absolutely Marvel & DC
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 июн 2024
- Check out our hot sauce as well! Get Hatchin Jalapeno at www.thishotsauceis.com
Need a Shirt? intotheam.com/absolutely
Gamer Supps! gamersupps.gg/Comics
Support Directly! / absolutelymarveldc
Check out our other channels!
/ comicstorian
/ comicpop
/ hassankhadair
/ foxtoastx 
Развлечения
Oh no. Sony's learned the wrong lesson again.
They always do 😞
😂😂😂 facts
Is it a day that ends in Y?
The last thing sony did right was by the rights to Spider-Man and HULK😂😂
This is why Into The Spider-Verde was so good. The heads of Sony weren’t paying attention to it. Game over!
And somehow the lesson they learned isn't to just hire good and reliable filmmakers and let them tell a story they're passionate about. Instead Sony decided they need to triple the studio meddling and make movies by committee
“Spray it on your food and eat it” is such a hilariously great way to advertise a sauce.
If they want a live action Spider-Man universe so bad why not do 2099, hire a director that has Cyberpunk sensibilities, cast Diego Boneta as live action Miguel O'Hara, and you can even this 2099 is the future of the Sam Raimi Spider-man movies.
Joseph Kosinski or Gareth Edwards as director.
Just make that Black Cat & Silver Sable movie, and have that animated.
lol I love how Sal just speeds through the sponsor and just wants to get to the news. While Benny will do his whole speele about the hot sauce. I don’t know if that says Sal knows people don’t like sponsor sections , he doesn’t like sponsor section or he just wants to get to the news.
I was on board right until Sal said no Spider-man, it's crazy they don't realize that's the problem yet
Okay but Despicable Me but it's Norman Osborne could be hilarious
LMAOOO
I think Sony has an addiction. We need to gather their friends and family, sit them down and read speeches to them to let them know how their actions have an effect on others.
If it’s the superior foes of Spider-Man then that good idea just silly d-list villains robbing hammer head or something
Hassan doesn’t deserve the hate he gets! Poor dude.
He adds a great point of view to the show! Everyone's probably butt Hurt it isn't them on the show
@@chowderman8888some people aren’t crazy about tik tok influencers who only watch CW adaptations and the movies talk about comic stuff, sorry pal
@@dws0828good thing I’ve been reading comics since I was 13 and got hired to be a part of the team based on my experience and knowledge. Not because of my TikTok influence lmao
He's an asshole. Him blaming the first-time director for Madame Web and calling them a "talentless hack" who should go back to television is precisely the kind of crap the greater film and television community has too much of.
I love spraying hot sauce on food and eating it!
I have to agree with Captain Midnight, Sony's just making these things to confuse the general audience and hurt the MCU. Even with an animated movie, animated stuff does exist in the MCU with I am Groot and What If...?, and No Way Home was referenced in Across the Spider-Verse, Sony find a way to ruin their movie and just hurt everyone else's fun with the other Marvel stuff. We need to get Spider-Man free from Sony's grubby fingers, they haven't made a good decision with the property in years.
In early 2000’s Sony’s Defense, did they really have a reason to believe anything else was worth buying? Fox had X-Men, Fantastic Four, Blade and even Ghost Rider, and What came with them, Universal had Hulk, what was there for them to believe it was worth it before the Iron Man movie?
The sole reason Sony is floundering is because they’re trying to make Villains be the stars of their own solo movies, or in the case of Madame Web, make supporting character ‘Spider People’ with as little Spider-ness as possible despite *literally Owning Spider-man*.
You can definitely do webswinging exciting in live action. Just do creative stuff, different angels and perspectives. Have someone looking out a window a whoosh a blur goes by. It's pretty simple stuff here.
They failed at painting their narratives over the heroes, so now they want to try it with the villians. The goal is for them to find a character that they can paint over that fans will accept. That character would need to be created, it doesn't exist, but the only thing more taboo than writing a character faithfully is taking the (percieved) risk on letting their shit ideas stand on their own two feet with new ip.
Hussan why do you need to do a Spider-Man impression everytime you talk about the character?
Sal, I have to disagree. I would watch a JJJ movie if; it was just him in his office, confused why nothing interesting is going on. Meanwhile Spider-Man is just swinging back and forth outside his window, fighting different bad guys, and every time he turns around nothing is happening.
Of course Sony is doing this. We can’t get an R rated live action Venom movie, but they’ll do an animated one. Even though a large percentage of the audience of animated projects are children, so if they make it rated R they’ll be blocking some of the audience. I don’t know what the hell they’re doing over there.
I really hope this doesn't happen however I think the only way this could possibly work is by making this set in earth 42 from the end of across the spiderverse where there isn't a spiderman and have the lead be the miles prowler
We could have seen Tom Holland meet The Beyonder.
Idk, we got 2 Joker movies with no Batman. 🤷♂
My argument is Tom Holland Spider-man's revenge motive was the sixth member of the Sinister Six.
Who excited about Skyler gisondo being cast as jimmy Olsen
Yeah this definitely sounds more like a mandate decision, sony never learns
The thing is. Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League (a story I enjoyed) proved…you cannot have an actual supervillain movie.
If the villain has to fight an established beloved superhero then fans will reject it if the hero loses or dies in the end.
So you get these safe films like Joker, or Suicide Squad where they’re basically fighting something worst than themselves.
Which means there’s not really much to explore with the concept of a villain movie as it is today.
I see no real point in doing this project
Actually, there's one villain-centric movie that DID work really well: Joker. But that worked because they had a good director with creative freedom.
Sony is constantly interfering with their directors and rushing to big events, both with ASM2 and these villain films.
The only time they didn’t? The Spider-Verse movies, aka some of their best movies to date.
Honestly joker worked because it was built on other amazing movies, it was stupid it was a joker movie cause it's nothing like him
@@kadegetslaid634 Joker worked because it was a story about an unlucky guy who unleashes his anger at everyone that wronged him. You don’t need to watch any other movies to understand it or enjoy it. They only includes references to the source material when they enhance the story.
@@riakriak7270it’s basically just Taxi Driver and King of Comedy mixed together with some Batman IP slapped onto it. Its just convenient that most people of my generation (gen Z) haven’t seen most movies before 1985
@@dws0828 Even so, it is still a GOOD movie. These villain centric movies can work if you have an interesting story that matches the character, instead of dumping out something generic.
Lol idk, I'd watch a JJJ movie. Would have to have nothing to do with Spiderman though. Kind of like Wonka. J Jonah's rise to the top.
I think you have the wrong perspective here. A madame web movie could have been great. An aunt may movie could be great. A third garbage man from the left in the background of the last spider man movie could be great. But Sony is turning the crank on a formula for bad movies. To make a great movie you have to hire truly visionary people with the capacity to find other great talent and lead a production, and you need to then trust them to bring that to the finish line with as much support as you can offer without screwing with their process.
Until Sony commits to that process, they will continue to only produce good movies when a) nobody is looking (Spider-Man: Into the Spiderverse) or b) someone else gets control (Disney/Marvel Spider-Man movies).
To be completely frank, an animated sinister 6 movie DOES sound more interesting. If only because the stink of the terrible designs of the live action stuff wont be in it making it instantly more palatable (not so happy to be proven wrong on that though)
Can Sal sound a lil more happy about the hot sauce? it is funding you guys right?
Not really. It’s their own hot sauce
@@christianrapper5 that they are promoting
If only Sony had rights to a successful animated Spider-Man series everyone wants back and they could totally revive if they decided to work with Disney. But I guess that’s just a fantasy.
At this point, I am just marvelling at Sony's decisions. I do not care what they do, and I will never watch their stuff.
Give me everything Spider-Man spider woman and nick cage spider man
👍
You have to remember that Sony is a Japanese company. And they are NOTORIOUS for not paying attention to or caring how their property/ IPs are made in the U.S./ western countries.
Bro’s still flabbergasted at The Last Jedi subverting expectations to reinforce the values of the franchise. The third act is pure Star Wars action and character moments and spectacle.