For those who don't know, the codename of Carol (Sapphire) is a reference to the star sapphire corps which carol use to be part of in the comics. We can also see the symbol of the corps on Carol's helmet btw
They're mad that Hal broke the rules of war to beat the Sabres but I think he made a good point. He showed how just like his plane the Sabres can go only so high. And he also showed that unlike people computer's can't change their mind. A military pilot knows what their plane can't do. A computer won't stop until what it was told to do is done.
The issue is once you get into a maneuver like that you better know your plane will be the one to stall out last because once you commit (in either position) someone is very likely going to get shot down. If you break off pursuing then the other plane now has an energy and height advantage and will be at minimum on your tail if not already having shot your plane down. But the drones should have been programmed with the scenario given it was a notable maneuver used against rookie American pilots in WWII flying Wildcats and the like where they would chase a Zero until they stalled exactly like the drones did for an easy kill. It also burned the Japanese pilots hard when the Hellcats were introduced having the power to push past where the Zero pilots had expected a Wildcat to stall and having said Hellcat still climbing as the Zero pulls out expecting a stalled Wildcat.
Imagine if they made this like a Green Lantern prequel movie. A super hero movie following Hal Jordan but played completely straight with absolutely no super powers or sci-fi elements.
I don't think the Sabers would have followed him above the engagement limit. That seems like something that would be hard programmed into a drone. Don't fly where you will stall out. They would have circled like sharks underneath him waiting for him to stall, drop like a rock, and get blown out of the sky. Still cool scene.
Yes, but if they just stayed and circled down, he could just head back and fire on them from above, which would be easy since they aren't going up. The AI planes were dumb for both following the same plane in the first place during the dogfight.
it's a really old tactic. Used in Korea and maybe Vietnam by an American Ace (i can't remember which), the pilot was engaged against enemies whose fighters had better turn radius (in MiGs) and so he took the aircraft to max ceiling with the exact same stunt and took both out.
"Allow me to introduce myself, my name is Tom, I'm like the technical analyst here, I'm made of rocks as you can see, but don't let that intimidate you"
okay, Hal may be cocky sometimes but seeing this (even though they're drones and wouldn't have followed him so high up) it's safe to say that Hal has the right to be that way, I mean he had the skill to back up his smack talking the drones, to me, as long as you can back up your words you can be as cocky as you want to be, if not, you better shut your mouth
This is why I don’t think drones will fully replace pilots anytime soon. Sure they don’t have to be trained, they can pull harder maneuvers, and complete extremely dangerous missions, but they lack the ability to think outside of their basic programming and set rules...
So let me get this straight. They wanted to prove that the drones could outsmart and outfly human pilots. In order to do that, they needed the human pilots to try their absolute best to outsmart the drones and the drones to succeed. The human pilot tried his best to outsmart and outfly the drones (which is exactly what he was supposed to do), and the DRONES failed..... So now they're angry at the human for outsmarting and outflying the drones?
The Government spends over a billion dollars creating a an unbreakable code for their spy network, only to have broken by a boy with Autism(mercury rising). Yeah that's pretty much how everything turns out. They want you to beat the machine, then get mad when you beat the machine.
Eric Naylor I thought the point was to prove that Hal is such a good pilot he could outfly and maneuver against drones because he’s the main protagonist and a hot shot pilot who’s rebellious and likes to do things his way. That’s pretty much what I took and that’s how he’s portrayed in the comics
Why do these lonely nobodies always feel they have to chime in on everything?? Do you actually think anyone cares whether you liked it or not Antifa boy? You’re an insecure, self-hating Ioser rotting away in cyberspace l..,save the bandwidth Dumbo.😮
@@Pimped_poet 1:20 Here her code name is Sapphire, which is a reference to the Green Lantern comics where Carol becomes a Violet Lanern (Star Sapphires)
@@Pimped_poet Carol's codename is "Sapphire"---a reference to Star Sapphire, her alter ego in the comics. Probably the ONLY Star Sapphire reference in this movie since we don't have Star Sapphire Corps in this movie unfortunately.
@@smoketinytom Also remember that the F-35 has vertical takeoff and landing capabilities so the pilot could simply re-direct the nozzles downward or sides to avoid stalling.
@@tuparorei3259 No… That’s not possible. It’s VTOL capability is not done via “nozzles” rather because it opens a lid for another downward turbofan and it swivels it’s rear exhaust down. Additionally, the aircraft still would have stalled due to insufficient oxygen within the fuel air mix within the engine. Lighting fuel with no oxygen means no ignition.
A similar thing happened during a wargame in the Persian Gulf. Everyone expected Iran to lose. The person playing the Iran side, a Marine Corps general, had other ideas and played the Iranian side his way and gave the American fleet and ass-kicking to end all ass-kickings!!!😀😀😀
The government should've given them the go for this project since no one would've been daring enough to head above the atmosphere and besides that the drones did outfly and outsmart many pilots so this one incident should've not been that bad.
Two issues with this scene: a) They go from checking weapons to fighting the drones nearly immediately without strongly indicating that the transition took place, and b) they go from being really close to the ground to in the clouds in two seconds. Hal used Carol as a decoy so he could get behind them, but because of this unexplained transition from the ground to the clouds it seems like more time has passed than makes sense. So it seems like an extra plane came out of nowhere that then disappears after two cuts and that Hal used Carol as a decoy for no reason as he didn't come up behind them until significantly after they shot her down. These issues make it hard to easily follow what is going on and hurt the impact of the scene overall.
no, it's not him, he and Reynolds haven't worked together before Free Guy, they said that clearly in this intetrview ruclips.net/video/KYBlWFFZFVo/видео.html
I'm not the biggest fan of F-35, but this scene was portraying it in a REALLY castrated way lol When I watched this in theatres I laughed because of the entertainment value, but I wanted to cry at the amount of holes in this scene. Compressor DOES NOT stall because of altitude. Compressor stalls when air is too turbulent or flow is too uneven, but F-35 has demonstrated falling straight down ass-first without such a thing happening. Altitude can only cause a flameout due to oxygen starvation, but pressure ratio on F-135 engine is monstrous. As a result the engine in F-35 most certainly DOES NOT flame out or stall at 50000ft. F135 engine has the hottest core of all jet engines in the western world. If the previous-gen Flankers fly at 60000ft, then F-35 will not flame out at 50000ft. Locking onto targets when you have ESA radar (active or passive) takes no more than 2 seconds. So them taking this long to lock onto targets is funny.
At least Carol's codename was "Sapphire" even if we don't get to see Star Sapphire Corps at all. Carol: There isn't anything you can do they cannot do BETTER, faster and without disappointing women everywhere. DANG. Savage, Carol 😂😂😂
Still doesn't have to beat every pilot just be better than 98 percent without casualties and work in unison in large numbers. The honest biggest benefit is without the human component they can pull harsher maneuvers
Uroš Raca I think you are perhaps being a little nasty there. Opinions are opinions until they are blatantly offensive. But who am I to talk, I think you are a piece of shit for hating Ryan Reynolds.
In side by side air maneuverability and even top speed, the F-22 Raptor would come out on top over the newly introduced F-35s. Where the F-35s shine tho, are their advanced tech and weapons carrying and usability capabilities with their stealth modes to really complete the package!!
the fact that both aircraft get compared annoys me. the f-22 was made for air superiority, while the f-35 takes and fighter-bomber role. they're 2 different aircraft and should be treated as such
As a non-GL purist, I actually liked the movie. I would have liked to see more Kilowog and they played Hal Jordan more of a smart-ass like Guy Gardner.
Guy Gardner is a much bigger smart ass this is in line with hal don’t know if that’s more on Ryan’s part of the movie or if the writers wanted to actually respect Hal’s character for the comics
Eric Martinez no yeah you’re definitely right it is a cult legend, I was just referring to the plot of the upcoming sequel, it’s top gun navy pilots in the world of drone warfare
@@rusiatevuetibau6333 My mistake, my friend, I apologize. So that's the plot for the new top gun movie? I hope not, because it will be the same plot as the Jaime Foxx movie, Stealth, which was a complete failure.
So why couldn't the devs just take this experience, hard code in the part about not going above 15K, and to use evasive maneuvers, tactics, and even dropping down to point up to shoot a missile at the target that is otherwise just above a point where you can't fly, but can still shoot at. They've already done the hard part. How hard could the rest of the coding be to finish it off? Not to mention the fact that if the drones had won, got mass-produced, only to find that giant flaw, his ass would be grass.
Voice inside my head tells me to ask Ryan what he expects an hope he gets my drift like if they eaxpet an hope for some thing the likely chance of that happening is verry high.
If you watch the movie and like the character read Geoff johns green lantern its an amazing run!! this movie doesn't begin to show how badass the character of hal Jordan is!!
the f22 is the better air superiority fighter, and if they are trying to go for the best of the best why would they pit it up against a strike fighter, and not against an aircraft where dogfights are it's job?
Not sure. Just saw this movie 2 weeks ago and damn i don't care what people say about it i missed out not seeing it on the big screen because its better than most marvel movies i have watched.
True. But it's actually pretty realistic, the Air Force is very protective of the F-22 and it's technology. They're much more likely to sell F-35's to a contractor like Ferris.
@@Diiwiin99 Carol Ferris (DC) 1st appearance was in 1959 with her super villian alter ego Star Sapphire making her debut in 1962. Carol Danvers (Marvel) didn't make her 1st appearance in the comics until 1968. The logo you see in this clip is seemingly that of the airforce. Technically Marvel took the idea and name of Carol Ferris from DC and made her a hero instead of becoming a tragic villian
![Arrival T-800 | Terminator 2 [FULL SCREEN]](/img/1.gif)
For those who don't know, the codename of Carol (Sapphire) is a reference to the star sapphire corps which carol use to be part of in the comics. We can also see the symbol of the corps on Carol's helmet btw
They're mad that Hal broke the rules of war to beat the Sabres but I think he made a good point. He showed how just like his plane the Sabres can go only so high. And he also showed that unlike people computer's can't change their mind. A military pilot knows what their plane can't do. A computer won't stop until what it was told to do is done.
The issue is once you get into a maneuver like that you better know your plane will be the one to stall out last because once you commit (in either position) someone is very likely going to get shot down. If you break off pursuing then the other plane now has an energy and height advantage and will be at minimum on your tail if not already having shot your plane down. But the drones should have been programmed with the scenario given it was a notable maneuver used against rookie American pilots in WWII flying Wildcats and the like where they would chase a Zero until they stalled exactly like the drones did for an easy kill. It also burned the Japanese pilots hard when the Hellcats were introduced having the power to push past where the Zero pilots had expected a Wildcat to stall and having said Hellcat still climbing as the Zero pulls out expecting a stalled Wildcat.
Sometimes the term Human ‘error’ should be replaced with Human ‘necessity’.
Why did they have to make a Green Lantern film? This would've been a fine fighter pilot movie
Imagine if they made this like a Green Lantern prequel movie. A super hero movie following Hal Jordan but played completely straight with absolutely no super powers or sci-fi elements.
@@DontMessWithCaesar nah
Because green lantern is one of the best superheroes who arguably has the best mythology in fiction
It is telling us his origin story
Top gun > any movie about aviation
I don't think the Sabers would have followed him above the engagement limit. That seems like something that would be hard programmed into a drone. Don't fly where you will stall out. They would have circled like sharks underneath him waiting for him to stall, drop like a rock, and get blown out of the sky.
Still cool scene.
devs missed out on those few lines of coding.
so couldnt hal just stay at like 15,001 feet or 16,000 feet and just fight the drones from above since they cant go any higher to shoot him
Yes, but if they just stayed and circled down, he could just head back and fire on them from above, which would be easy since they aren't going up.
The AI planes were dumb for both following the same plane in the first place during the dogfight.
it's a really old tactic. Used in Korea and maybe Vietnam by an American Ace (i can't remember which), the pilot was engaged against enemies whose fighters had better turn radius (in MiGs) and so he took the aircraft to max ceiling with the exact same stunt and took both out.
They're still being tested, evidently they don't have a proper strategy for this situation.
"Allow me to introduce myself, my name is Tom, I'm like the technical analyst here, I'm made of rocks as you can see, but don't let that intimidate you"
Unless you're made of scissors, of course.
@@Keihryon thats a rock paper scissors joke for ya! :D
@@craigmiesterable oh yeah this whole thing is a circle, but not a circle circle, more like a freaky circle
@@craigmiesterable see you later new doug
okay, Hal may be cocky sometimes but seeing this (even though they're drones and wouldn't have followed him so high up) it's safe to say that Hal has the right to be that way, I mean he had the skill to back up his smack talking the drones, to me, as long as you can back up your words you can be as cocky as you want to be, if not, you better shut your mouth
This is why I don’t think drones will fully replace pilots anytime soon. Sure they don’t have to be trained, they can pull harder maneuvers, and complete extremely dangerous missions, but they lack the ability to think outside of their basic programming and set rules...
With A.I now that's possible too
I love how she talking to him, and then she’s actually his wife in real life...
They met on set. Ryan was still married to Scarlett Johansson, and Blake was dating someone at the time as well.
Their chemistry in the movie was horrible, it was all kinds of Cringe. Funny how that relationship turned out.
@@Neojhun cringe, I'd say the opposite
She wasn't when this movie was made sooo
So let me get this straight.
They wanted to prove that the drones could outsmart and outfly human pilots.
In order to do that, they needed the human pilots to try their absolute best to outsmart the drones and the drones to succeed.
The human pilot tried his best to outsmart and outfly the drones (which is exactly what he was supposed to do), and the DRONES failed.....
So now they're angry at the human for outsmarting and outflying the drones?
They needed the drones to succeed to win gov contracts which is money.
That his how these big weapon companies stay afloat.
Okay, but the point still stands: they're angry with the human for doing exactly what the human was supposed to do.
Yes which is part of the reason why the plot in this movie reeks
The Government spends over a billion dollars creating a an unbreakable code for their spy network, only to have broken by a boy with Autism(mercury rising). Yeah that's pretty much how everything turns out.
They want you to beat the machine, then get mad when you beat the machine.
Eric Naylor I thought the point was to prove that Hal is such a good pilot he could outfly and maneuver against drones because he’s the main protagonist and a hot shot pilot who’s rebellious and likes to do things his way. That’s pretty much what I took and that’s how he’s portrayed in the comics
The only good thing that ca,e out of this movie, Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively both found their soulmates
Each other! Now they both have 3 kids
No other things good came out of this movie. Discovery and recognition for this amazing character.
To be honest with you i ve enjoyed this film a lot.i dont care what others say
Why do these lonely nobodies always feel they have to chime in on everything?? Do you actually think anyone cares whether you liked it or not Antifa boy? You’re an insecure, self-hating Ioser rotting away in cyberspace l..,save the bandwidth Dumbo.😮
Ohh the small star sapphire reference
Flips4Dayz where
@@Pimped_poet 1:20 Here her code name is Sapphire, which is a reference to the Green Lantern comics where Carol becomes a Violet Lanern (Star Sapphires)
@@Skibidi_Rex You can also see the Star Sapphire symbol on the side of her helmet.
@@Bulls3ye86 Good call!
@@Pimped_poet Carol's codename is "Sapphire"---a reference to Star Sapphire, her alter ego in the comics. Probably the ONLY Star Sapphire reference in this
movie since we don't have Star Sapphire Corps in this movie unfortunately.
This stalling technique can be found in 90% dogfight moves.
Exactly. Bud Anderson and his "Old Crow" comes to mind.
Pffft, even War Thunder used it.
@@smoketinytom
Also remember that the F-35 has vertical takeoff and landing capabilities so the pilot could simply re-direct the nozzles downward or sides to avoid stalling.
@@tuparorei3259 No… That’s not possible. It’s VTOL capability is not done via “nozzles” rather because it opens a lid for another downward turbofan and it swivels it’s rear exhaust down. Additionally, the aircraft still would have stalled due to insufficient oxygen within the fuel air mix within the engine. Lighting fuel with no oxygen means no ignition.
A similar thing happened during a wargame in the Persian Gulf. Everyone expected Iran to lose. The person playing the Iran side, a Marine Corps general, had other ideas and played the Iranian side his way and gave the American fleet and ass-kicking to end all ass-kickings!!!😀😀😀
THE BEST SCENE OF THE MOVIE
The government should've given them the go for this project since no one would've been daring enough to head above the atmosphere and besides that the drones did outfly and outsmart many pilots so this one incident should've not been that bad.
A dead movie, an irrelevant topic.
Kronos True, why'd I bother.
@@bargainbin6162 Must be that extra chromosome you got.
@@Kronos0999 Come on man.
@@GruntyGame Where we going?
“You can be my decoy any time.“ -Halverick
He broke the rules of engagement just like Maverick did 😂🤘
@Sam Yaza yeah agreed
Holy Crap! I didn’t realize Taika Waititi was in this!!!
Two issues with this scene:
a) They go from checking weapons to fighting the drones nearly immediately without strongly indicating that the transition took place, and
b) they go from being really close to the ground to in the clouds in two seconds. Hal used Carol as a decoy so he could get behind them, but because of this unexplained transition from the ground to the clouds it seems like more time has passed than makes sense. So it seems like an extra plane came out of nowhere that then disappears after two cuts and that Hal used Carol as a decoy for no reason as he didn't come up behind them until significantly after they shot her down.
These issues make it hard to easily follow what is going on and hurt the impact of the scene overall.
Two? this is completely shit movie, nothing real but the outterline of F-35..
conclusion, watch deadpool instead
@@inzhener2007 No where did I suggest that I was listing all problems in the scene.
Am I the only one who thought his nickname was Eyeball for like the last 6 years...
Allosaurus Rex It isn't?!
@@selanetz2656Highball
You're the only one to remember this scene xD
So this is how Ryan met Blake
Umm is that Taika Waititi in the control room? 😨
yes it is.
Oh gawd and an American Accent. Hope he does not do that seriously again.
no, it's not him, he and Reynolds haven't worked together before Free Guy, they said that clearly in this intetrview ruclips.net/video/KYBlWFFZFVo/видео.html
@@H8Pi It's him. And they don't work together here.
@@H8Pi it's actually is taika
you should not be calling this video the extended cut because everything in the video was in the standard cut of green lantern!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I like how her code name is Sapphire. Hehe 😁
I'm not the biggest fan of F-35, but this scene was portraying it in a REALLY castrated way lol When I watched this in theatres I laughed because of the entertainment value, but I wanted to cry at the amount of holes in this scene.
Compressor DOES NOT stall because of altitude. Compressor stalls when air is too turbulent or flow is too uneven, but F-35 has demonstrated falling straight down ass-first without such a thing happening. Altitude can only cause a flameout due to oxygen starvation, but pressure ratio on F-135 engine is monstrous. As a result the engine in F-35 most certainly DOES NOT flame out or stall at 50000ft. F135 engine has the hottest core of all jet engines in the western world. If the previous-gen Flankers fly at 60000ft, then F-35 will not flame out at 50000ft.
Locking onto targets when you have ESA radar (active or passive) takes no more than 2 seconds. So them taking this long to lock onto targets is funny.
This is a green lantern movie not a pilot movie
@@alienus9092 I know it's a fun movie, but this is just next-level lazy.
@@Max_Da_G this movie is not fun at all
@@alienus9092 For kids ;)
Talk to me Goose I mean Wade I mean Highball.
i think this would be a better fighter pilot movie than a green lantern movie lol
Yep if they make remake they must work better at hal and green lantern movie and pilot part can be kept from this movie
When Deadshot found out that the gun was real and popped one off in the air brought me here! Bc he never misses a shot!
At least Carol's codename was "Sapphire" even if we don't get to see Star Sapphire Corps at all.
Carol: There isn't anything you can do they cannot do BETTER, faster and without disappointing women everywhere. DANG. Savage, Carol 😂😂😂
Still doesn't have to beat every pilot just be better than 98 percent without casualties and work in unison in large numbers. The honest biggest benefit is without the human component they can pull harsher maneuvers
More specifically why is this Green Lantern not in the current Justice League movies?
Becuase he would be too powerful for other villains to handle, THE POWER OF WILL IS LIMITLESS!!! :)
An also cause Ryan Reynolds would shoot himself before signing on to be green latern. Oh wait he already did in deadpool 2
Cos he's Deadpool....
Uroš Raca I think you are perhaps being a little nasty there. Opinions are opinions until they are blatantly offensive. But who am I to talk, I think you are a piece of shit for hating Ryan Reynolds.
Blake lively is fine as hell
In side by side air maneuverability and even top speed, the F-22 Raptor would come out on top over the newly introduced F-35s. Where the F-35s shine tho, are their advanced tech and weapons carrying and usability capabilities with their stealth modes to really complete the package!!
It's Vlad, not Vladimir The F-22 can do everything the F-35 can (except VTOL), and do it better.
the fact that both aircraft get compared annoys me. the f-22 was made for air superiority, while the f-35 takes and fighter-bomber role. they're 2 different aircraft and should be treated as such
I don’t get why they’re angry at Hal, he literally just outsmarted state of the art drones and proved that human pilots are superior
If deadshot misses, you know here the bullet goes
Guess they didn't hear what happened to Francis.
Low key testing the NGAD 6th gen.
I don't get why everyone hates this movie so much.
that's taika watiti 1:13
Sure looks like him.
Yes that's him
This movie came out in 2011 and the F-35 still isn’t ready for combat
it's already in service with the usmc, the air force, and the navy. kinda seems like it's ready
Funny how this movie had a higher budget and came out 3 years after Iron Man, and yet the F-22 scene looked considerably better than this scene.
Dogfight at such low altitude is not done. But we anderstand moviemakers. It's for showing dynamic scenes.
As a non-GL purist, I actually liked the movie. I would have liked to see more Kilowog and they played Hal Jordan more of a smart-ass like Guy Gardner.
The character and mythology is too good to not adapt, hopefully the long ass time with the show is to make sure they get it right!!
Guy Gardner is a much bigger smart ass this is in line with hal don’t know if that’s more on Ryan’s part of the movie or if the writers wanted to actually respect Hal’s character for the comics
We need a sequel
This movie didn’t do so well but I did like this scene.
1:14 I didn’t know Moss from The IT Crowd was in this movie.
If only the movie would ended here.
This stall maneuver looks familiar.
Heheh...Sapphire...
...sequel bait...ugh.
did u use your wing man as a deco
This used to make so much sense back then. But now that im a programmer i believe a programmer would definately hardcode to prohibit any such actions.
Which also would give chance to higball because when they stop following he gets clear shot
looks like top gun
Kinda impressive they’re using f-35s considering when this came out
Top Gun: Maverick is something similar...it’s the top gun sequel
Ok this ones has pilots and airplanes, as Top Gun. But Top Gun is cult is lengend. So to different things.
Eric Martinez no yeah you’re definitely right it is a cult legend, I was just referring to the plot of the upcoming sequel, it’s top gun navy pilots in the world of drone warfare
@@rusiatevuetibau6333 My mistake, my friend, I apologize. So that's the plot for the new top gun movie? I hope not, because it will be the same plot as the Jaime Foxx movie, Stealth, which was a complete failure.
The music while combat gives me ace combat vibes
He just proved a human is a better pilot because of they are unpredictable. why are they so mad. Besides they can just rebuild them to go higher.
if ur on pc hold space it sounds nice
The CGI is so bad in this movie, they didn't even care to put a cockpit in 3:57
Star Sapphire and green lantern would be amazing
Why test the Sabres against an F35. This is a dogfighting exercise. Wouldn't you want it to be tested against the F22?
Wait where have I seen this actress somewhere? Can anyone give examples of movies this actress is in? Much appreciated XD
Her name is blake lively. Just google her. You will get the list
She's ryan Reynolds wife
@@bradmk.842 In the film or IRL?
The only saving grace from this movie is that Ryan Reynolds bonked Blake Lively
Nah kidding, this movie was awesome!
Yeah, so F-35 using a WWII dogfight tactic...
Hey, if you got the superior ceiling why not?.
He was out of options, stalling isn't a bad last ditch option.
The Top Gun: Maverick flight test scene remind to this.
Two Failures from DC became two big names in Marvel.
Guess who and who?
Deadpool and Korg
and this is why humans are better then AI drones
So why couldn't the devs just take this experience, hard code in the part about not going above 15K, and to use evasive maneuvers, tactics, and even dropping down to point up to shoot a missile at the target that is otherwise just above a point where you can't fly, but can still shoot at.
They've already done the hard part. How hard could the rest of the coding be to finish it off? Not to mention the fact that if the drones had won, got mass-produced, only to find that giant flaw, his ass would be grass.
Voice inside my head tells me to ask Ryan what he expects an hope he gets my drift like if they eaxpet an hope for some thing the likely chance of that happening is verry high.
Theres like a similar scene in the adam project
Only time you will ever see a f35 working is in this film as in real life they can't turn run or fight and get beat by jets from the 70s 😄
Jesus ok this green lantern thing is alien tech but the planes are human and it hurts me to see the way theyre flying hahaha
So he killed his wingman and he laughs..... I don't find that funny.
ZetmanAxel most likely because he knew that it was a test and that she wouldnt be in any danger if she “died”?
And he used a Korean War manoevuer to get them
una maniobra que se usa desde que se invento el avion
Love it
Please tell us what the name of this movie is
Green Lantern
If you watch the movie and like the character read Geoff johns green lantern its an amazing run!! this movie doesn't begin to show how badass the character of hal Jordan is!!
the f22 is the better air superiority fighter, and if they are trying to go for the best of the best why would they pit it up against a strike fighter, and not against an aircraft where dogfights are it's job?
Because its a movie dude... The amount of people that even know the difference between the F22 and an F35 *and* is watching this movie is minuscule.
because the F-35 is a problem ridden dog , so the Military are trying to shoehorn it into any movie co-operation they do, to try and promote it
Same, I was thinking, " isn't the F22 better in dog fights? F35 is good but its main role is not this.
@@farmerned6 F-22 and F-16 both had their problems. They'll get fixed eventually.
@@saulloll8547 Dogfights are won by pilots not planes. Doesn't matter what the plane can do when the pilot is shit.
Why is GL not in JL movies?
As I understand it they're building up to him.
This movie is a separate continuity because DC and Warner Bros. love rebooting superhero franchises every time one of their movies flop.
He was suppose to appear in JL part 2 when Darkseid shows up
Not sure. Just saw this movie 2 weeks ago and damn i don't care what people say about it i missed out not seeing it on the big screen because its better than most marvel movies i have watched.
This was the best scene in the movie and the title of the movie makes that pretty sad
Doesn't she become a Lantern Herself aswell ?
star sapphire. violet lantern.
Υεσ
Making an F-22 look good... That needs a real super hero!! And a "fookin" massive bottom less pit of money....
it's an f-35
Well, he's fired.
Fire A Double Sided Missle.Fire Backward...
I think they should have used f22 raptors
True. But it's actually pretty realistic, the Air Force is very protective of the F-22 and it's technology. They're much more likely to sell F-35's to a contractor like Ferris.
@@Bulls3ye86 ya that makes sense
@@Bulls3ye86 isn't that because the f35 is a joint venture from 8 country's where as the raptor is designed specifically for the us?
corse the fail it's F-35....... F-22 would have been the better choice
Our human brain is a better than those sabers
Как называется фильм
Snappa and Doldora.
those planes seem to have the front end of a F22 Raptor and the rear end of a single engine jet fighter wannabe
She was star sappire?
Was this movie meant to be the start of the dceu?
at one point yes.
Man of steel is
Название фильма?
i never realized her name was carol and she has the captain marvel logo on her helmet
Carol aka Captain Marvel is Marvel comics. This is based on DC comics. Like what are you even talking about
@@SHINIGAMI_CHIKUBI69 that's what I mean its a DC film with a cap marvel reference
@@Diiwiin99 Carol Ferris (DC) 1st appearance was in 1959 with her super villian alter ego Star Sapphire making her debut in 1962.
Carol Danvers (Marvel) didn't make her 1st appearance in the comics until 1968. The logo you see in this clip is seemingly that of the airforce. Technically Marvel took the idea and name of Carol Ferris from DC and made her a hero instead of becoming a tragic villian
Shazam was originally Captain Marvel
Что за фильм? Экшона хочется
Что за фильм?)
So she’s going to become star sapphire?
In the sequel, but that’s probably never happening.
Blake Lively was cool.
So that's what dog fights are like huh?
Perhaps the only good thing which came out of this movie was their relationship
No also Discovery and recognition for this amazing character
US pilots fighting melee