.300 Browning Light Machine Gun mechanism

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 июн 2017
  • Diagrammatic description of the mechanism of the .300-in. Browning Light Machine Gun.

Комментарии • 42

  • @ScoutSniper3124
    @ScoutSniper3124 7 месяцев назад +2

    John Moses Browning was an AWESOME gun designer.
    Complicated, sure, reliable, HELL YES.

  • @mohammedcohen
    @mohammedcohen 3 года назад +16

    This is absolutely WONDERFUL...thank you...Exacting detail of all that is happening in less than a second from charging/chambering/firing/extracting...the great mind of John Moses Browning...a simplification of Hiram Maxim's world changing invention...why I love firearms so much...the engineering & mechanics that make this work...

    • @Rustebadge
      @Rustebadge 9 месяцев назад

      Hiram Maxims' gun worked on recoil while JMB worked on gas assist. Very different.

  • @theflyingfool
    @theflyingfool 3 года назад +7

    What an ingenious mechanism. Hardly any wear as everything slides or is pushed. No wonder these things work so well.

  • @robertmorey4104
    @robertmorey4104 Год назад +5

    Very cool video. All designed before computers. Astonishing how John Browning could visualize how all this worked. He also gave us the M2 heavy machine gun, still used today, 1911 pistol, Browning high power pistol, Browning Automatic Rifle and others. Amazing genius!

    • @xboxgorgo18
      @xboxgorgo18 Год назад

      Actually, Browning was dead before the Hi-Power pistol was even made

    • @norfangl3480
      @norfangl3480 Год назад

      @@xboxgorgo18 he started the project though

    • @oldfarthacks
      @oldfarthacks 11 месяцев назад +2

      The M2 is an upgraded version of the 1917/1919 action. The High Power is a 1911 with a simplified locking system. All of these things and so much more were in the mind of Browning and on paper before his death. Browning and Maxim were both mechanical wonder wizards.

  • @ashermil
    @ashermil 3 года назад +5

    John Browning was a mad genius.

  • @oldfarthacks
    @oldfarthacks 11 месяцев назад +2

    What is really interesting is how simple it is to convert the full auto version of this gun into a semi auto. Only 2 parts need to be changed, those being the sear and the trigger. You could actually just drop the semi auto parts into a full auto if you cut down the sides of the semi auto sear. For that matter, you can just weld up the sliding surface on a full auto sear and then use the disconnector semi auto trigger, so only one completely new part is required. So in reality, you could take a full auto gun and put the semi auto parts into it, they will work just fine and the gun will be a semi auto.
    Of course, due to the NFA thing, you do need to make the semi auto gun unable to take the full auto parts, this is done by making a right hand side plate with a block on it that keeps the full auto bolt from going into the gun. The difference in the bolt body is the width of the sear slot. The sear slot in the semi auto gun is wider so that the full auto sear will fall out. In general the barrel extension and lock frame are also altered to work with the denial island on the right hand side plate, but altering those makes no matter.

  • @garylewis3641
    @garylewis3641 4 года назад +6

    Great explanation of a great weapon!

  • @straightshootingtalk6715
    @straightshootingtalk6715 2 года назад +1

    Amazingly complex system! Thanks for finding and posting this.

  • @descriptiondescriptiondescript
    @descriptiondescriptiondescript 3 года назад

    Thank you for sharing this video.

  • @fahad_hassan_92
    @fahad_hassan_92 2 года назад

    Amazing for the time

  • @psh1491
    @psh1491 4 года назад +1

    thank you in korea

  • @ScoutSniper3124
    @ScoutSniper3124 6 месяцев назад

    17:21 Muzzle cone profile.

  • @Laotzu.Goldbug
    @Laotzu.Goldbug Год назад

    Going by the time stamp at the bottom just seems to be part of a much longer presentation, does anyone know where I can find the full thing?

  • @samjoelmossio8437
    @samjoelmossio8437 4 года назад

    Merci j'aimerais avoir la version française

  • @denniswalsh8476
    @denniswalsh8476 2 года назад +1

    Way more complicated than I thought.

  • @mischievousone3421
    @mischievousone3421 2 года назад

    lookin pretty good for a video made in 2017 haha

    • @thegunnut1944
      @thegunnut1944 Год назад

      You must be taking the piss 😂 the video is from the 40s/50s

  • @_abusadiq6262
    @_abusadiq6262 Год назад +1

    I hope to get an answer.. What is the benefit of the lock or the small latch inside the extension of the barrel? Why is it called a lock on which part it closes? Please answer.. Thank you

    • @janpostma5381
      @janpostma5381 Год назад +2

      It locks the barrel extension to the bolt so that when the gun fires the presure doesnt blow up the gun. Becouse theyre locked for a split second the bullet leavrs the gun and the pressure in the chabmer is lowered

    • @_abusadiq6262
      @_abusadiq6262 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@janpostma5381 Thank you, my brother. Your information is close to the answer. I have known this for a while. I have looked at some books and pamphlets related to the 50 cal submachine gun. I have delved more into this weapon. Your information is okay. 🎆

    • @oldfarthacks
      @oldfarthacks 11 месяцев назад

      Are you speaking of the spring latch that keeps the barrel from rotating? That is there to maintain headspace as the barrel does not seat on any surface and is free to rotate at any time. The spring keeps the barrel in the set position. In the US guns, that still sometimes walked, so when Israel took over the guns they changed the design to be a much more positive lock.
      There is also one other lock that is not covered in this video, that being on the right hand side of the lock frame. It locks the lock frame to the right hand side plate.

  • @MADMAX-yu4zg
    @MADMAX-yu4zg 3 года назад

    it`s the Browning M2 HB??

    • @andrewmapes7452
      @andrewmapes7452 3 года назад

      early version of the 0.303 Browning made in UK, by BSA based on the ANM2/MG40 and others including Canada, under licence

    • @LexaBelic
      @LexaBelic Год назад

      Acton is basicaly the same

    • @astridvallati4762
      @astridvallati4762 Год назад

      Browning M1919A4, standard Infantry and Tank MG in WWII, cal..30, ( .300 for Brits).
      The AN-M2 Aircraft Gun was the same design, but all major frame and barrel parts thinner to lower weight. The British Version of the AN-M2 design, the
      .303 Browning MG Mark I, II & III, British built in .303 calibre, for Wing and Turret Mounts. Built by Vickers, BSA, and J.Inglis, Toronto.
      DocAV

  • @user-gq6md9zs5f
    @user-gq6md9zs5f 3 года назад

    I'm a military and I have a 50 kall gun malfunction. Can you help me

  • @RedInk-ey9hx
    @RedInk-ey9hx Год назад

    I love the oldies

  • @enscroggs
    @enscroggs 4 года назад

    There are a number of oddities here. Firstly, the cartridges shown in the animation are rimless; they could be .30-06 Springfield, the native round of the M1919 or 7.92mm Mauser, the ammunition used by the BESA, another stand British tank MG. BSA made a .303 version of the Browning MG. Why not use that gun and simplify the logistics train? Secondly, the title refers to the "General Grant" tank. Churchill specifically forbade the use of "General" in reference to the American tanks. They were to be the Grant, the Lee, the Stuart, and the Sherman -- nothing else, in case the reference might be confused with an actual General Grant, etc.

    • @Mr.Wednesday.
      @Mr.Wednesday. 4 года назад +3

      Who cares

    • @Schaz42
      @Schaz42 3 года назад +3

      It perhaps was a US training film, but overdubbed for training other countries, hence, .30-06 animation

    • @astridvallati4762
      @astridvallati4762 Год назад +1

      @@Schaz42
      British Training Film, also used by Australia ( AWM Collection) with use of US Lend Lease Tanks from 1942 onwards. Note use of ".300 Browning" description ( purely British)
      DocAV

    • @oldfarthacks
      @oldfarthacks 11 месяцев назад

      @@Schaz42
      I would say that this is the case, the base movie came from the US and then they translated it into British from American.

  • @flipflopsguy8868
    @flipflopsguy8868 3 года назад +1

    I gave up six minutes in because I got a headache. 😕

  • @flipflopsguy8868
    @flipflopsguy8868 3 года назад

    Sorry.

  • @user-zj5kd8hk7d
    @user-zj5kd8hk7d Год назад

    うん。半分もわからん

  • @bowlwinkle
    @bowlwinkle 8 месяцев назад

    Why are all of the WWII videos way better at explaining mechanics compared to today? I don't get it. These videos (referencing the car videos, such as the rear diff vid) are too good. I have high hopes for AR, but seems we have regressed.

  • @mikem6176
    @mikem6176 3 года назад

    With apologies to our friends in the UK, the narrator’s voice is really annoying. I think I’d rather sit through a class led by Leonard Lawrence (Pvt Gomer Pyle of Full Metal Jacket fame.) Once he had started down his slippery slope toward total madness, he marveled at the mechanical beauty that made his M14 rifle function, and could easily teach a class in how the Garand system works.

  • @user-gq6md9zs5f
    @user-gq6md9zs5f 3 года назад

    I'm a military and I have a 50 kall gun malfunction. Can you help me