You guys are a joke as archivists, I fully understand putting a watermark and a timecode to prevent people from stealing these documentaries, but adding unnecessary white noise is one of the lamest attempts of protecting copyright I have ever seen. Removing or reducing the noise you artificially add in every one of the videos you upload would be as easy as decreasing the treble or using noise reduction in audacity, all it does is create an unpleasant experience for people who just want to enjoy this footage. It doesn't prevent theft
That's absurd. We don't add "unnecessary white noise". What an accusation! No, no, no that simply does not happen. The Soviet films are extremely low quality and tend to have a lot of noise in the soundtracks. Our efforts are aimed at presenting films as an audience would have originally seen them -- in other words we do not attempt to alter the audio or visuals from what appears on the original print or negative. So no -- we don't tamper with audio either to make it sound better OR worse. Unbelievable that you would even suggest this!
@@PeriscopeFilm then why does the noise in the intro you made sound exactly the same as the noise that plays throughout the video, and every video you've released. I work with vintage audio and video technology I know what it should sound like
I'm sure it's easily explained -- if I had to guess, most likely this Soviet film like many others is a poor quality "dupe" and the optical soundtrack on it got a several dB boost on our ScanStation, with the effect that noise was added all around including to the optical track on our leader. For someone who wants to throw around completely groundless accusations and say we're a "joke as archivists" for something we didn't even do -- I know it will be hard to change your opinion. But I can say categorically you are 100% dead wrong. @@cheesemanthe2nd
Incidentally optical soundtracks, especially mono soundtracks, are notoriously noisy on 16mm. The best soundtracks on 16mm are magnetic, but those are few and far between. 16mm sounds completely different than 35mm and larger format soundtracks.@@cheesemanthe2nd
@@PeriscopeFilm if this was real white noise it would have audible wow and flutter, the only reason a constant white noise like this would be in the transfer would be if whatever device you were recording from created it and not the film itself
Crazy MAD times.
Testing left much pollution. Thank God only two are known to have been used in anger.
В случае ядерного удара держите автомат на вытянутых руках, чтобы расплавленный металл не капал на казёные сапоги.
10:55 ACK
RIP headphone users
Oh seems like dear autor got old soviet arsenal somewhere😊
Thank you so much
Very interesting at (0:22). A bomber carrying MiG-15s. I didn’t know that the Soviets experimented with that, too.
Those were cruise missiles... shaped like a MiG 15...
Crazy how during those days you had.
Nuclear Artillery shells.
Depth Charges.
AAM
briefcases.
Torpedoes.
I'm sure I'm missing something.
these weapons are ridiculously powerful, let's pray they are never used again, but, there are madmen out there
I'm not buying it.
not buyin what?
@@slow-mo_moonbuggy
Let’s just hope that Islam never gets a hold of them 🙏🏼
@@Jeffery_Saulter Another Islamaphobe.
@@slow-mo_moonbuggy it’s a very scarey religion 💀
We are now playing a game of chicken. Who shoots first wins. Tic tok
I like nukes 🙂
😎Me too, they’re tasty with a side of fries and a big coke
You guys are a joke as archivists, I fully understand putting a watermark and a timecode to prevent people from stealing these documentaries, but adding unnecessary white noise is one of the lamest attempts of protecting copyright I have ever seen.
Removing or reducing the noise you artificially add in every one of the videos you upload would be as easy as decreasing the treble or using noise reduction in audacity, all it does is create an unpleasant experience for people who just want to enjoy this footage.
It doesn't prevent theft
That's absurd. We don't add "unnecessary white noise". What an accusation! No, no, no that simply does not happen. The Soviet films are extremely low quality and tend to have a lot of noise in the soundtracks. Our efforts are aimed at presenting films as an audience would have originally seen them -- in other words we do not attempt to alter the audio or visuals from what appears on the original print or negative. So no -- we don't tamper with audio either to make it sound better OR worse. Unbelievable that you would even suggest this!
@@PeriscopeFilm then why does the noise in the intro you made sound exactly the same as the noise that plays throughout the video, and every video you've released.
I work with vintage audio and video technology I know what it should sound like
I'm sure it's easily explained -- if I had to guess, most likely this Soviet film like many others is a poor quality "dupe" and the optical soundtrack on it got a several dB boost on our ScanStation, with the effect that noise was added all around including to the optical track on our leader. For someone who wants to throw around completely groundless accusations and say we're a "joke as archivists" for something we didn't even do -- I know it will be hard to change your opinion. But I can say categorically you are 100% dead wrong. @@cheesemanthe2nd
Incidentally optical soundtracks, especially mono soundtracks, are notoriously noisy on 16mm. The best soundtracks on 16mm are magnetic, but those are few and far between. 16mm sounds completely different than 35mm and larger format soundtracks.@@cheesemanthe2nd
@@PeriscopeFilm if this was real white noise it would have audible wow and flutter, the only reason a constant white noise like this would be in the transfer would be if whatever device you were recording from created it and not the film itself