We have to stop complaining, and talk about 4K, of course they are not going to make 4K ultrawide for the moment, because very few people have the configuration to run it properly, while 1440p even with an average configuration or top of Game the screen can be used at full power
@@piranhax6466 it makes senses 100% I'd rather lock my fps decently than getting a little more sharp. I went from a 34 inch 3440x1440 to this monitor and was afraid about it. And yeah i see it when i stick my freaking nose in the monitor but when i play games i feel the smoothness but i don't see the 20 more dot in each inches. G-sync, 240 fps, oled and got this screen at 920$ usd, really can't complain. Don't get me wrong it would be better with higher DPI but i'd rather get this, than 2000$ monitor and buy a 4090 to run it
@AlejandroMartinez-yv1gh I saw a différence ...not that's unusable but... it's not sharp as it supposed to. But that's my gaming monitor and it's awesome. And I use another screen for day to day work. I have a 2 monitor setup
why did u cheap out on the remote? it was such a good feature :( even the new 27gs95qe has one, i dont understand why the ultrawides and 4k doesnt have one while being much more expensive.
@@kevinstoops7216 okay that's what I thought. It's not much either and it's still a bit more than 32 inch 1440p so I'm cool with that. I just have a 4070 and it's perfect for 34 inch but I wouldn't want to lose any fps from there by a bigger screen.
As owner of lg ultrawide 34 screen ,I wanted to buy this 34 version ,the only thing that stoping me atm is th 800 curve its way to much, why did you make such a big curve insted of the 1800 you did on previos screens
@@enricod.7198 Arms length is correct distance for monitor use for either of these screens. At arms length, all areas of the screen on an 800r curve are equal distance from your eyes as well as pointing directly towards you.
never buy something as soon as possible. Production quality improves over time and often the first batches are the most flawed with dead pixels, faulty OS etc.
When are you going to release an OLED 39" with 3840x1600 resolution? You just missed the mark on this one. Literally no one asked for a 39" with 3440x1440...
The resolution is just too disappointing. For 39'' you gotta have something like 5120 x 2160 for crystal clear images. 1440p would give you full eyes of pixels (even on 34'', 1440p looks very pixelated)
Do you play at 20cm from the sceeen? Lmao. Yeah good luck running that resolution at anything more that 60fps in games that are not the crappy esports ones.
@@enricod.7198 If you put your 1440p 39'' monitor 1.5 meters away from you in order to see it clear, you might as well just get an 29'' LG ultrawide for $250.
@@anonymous8780 Like most users, I use monitor not only for gaming and sitting at a distance of 80 cm. Looking at the comments, not many people want such strong curves
Ehh why curved again... can't we have at least one good FLAT 34" 1440p (or even 4k) ultrawide OLED on the market getting sick of that silly curved craze:/
@@t4llv377slightly if you sit right in the centre for a 1 person not nearly enough to offset annoying bent geometry for productivity use like trading or watching movies with more than one person
We have to stop complaining, and talk about 4K, of course they are not going to make 4K ultrawide for the moment, because very few people have the configuration to run it properly, while 1440p even with an average configuration or top of Game the screen can be used at full power
It looks very good😊
Time to drop them in Europe guys !
Why 3440x1440 with 39"? Im waiting for 38GN950-B OLED successor with 3840x1600... So LG? When?
Yea makes no sense tbh
better then 45inch current
@@piranhax6466 it makes senses 100% I'd rather lock my fps decently than getting a little more sharp. I went from a 34 inch 3440x1440 to this monitor and was afraid about it. And yeah i see it when i stick my freaking nose in the monitor but when i play games i feel the smoothness but i don't see the 20 more dot in each inches.
G-sync, 240 fps, oled and got this screen at 920$ usd, really can't complain.
Don't get me wrong it would be better with higher DPI but i'd rather get this, than 2000$ monitor and buy a 4090 to run it
@@thedaeron3877 how's text? I recently bought it, waiting to arrive at home.
@AlejandroMartinez-yv1gh I saw a différence ...not that's unusable but... it's not sharp as it supposed to. But that's my gaming monitor and it's awesome. And I use another screen for day to day work. I have a 2 monitor setup
4k 27 inch glossy WOLED plz
I think its in their production pipeline
When is this going to be released in Germany?
Next week. Like tomorrow...
why did u cheap out on the remote? it was such a good feature :( even the new 27gs95qe has one, i dont understand why the ultrawides and 4k doesnt have one while being much more expensive.
You don't lose fps going from 34 to 39 inch 3440x1440p right? Both same res.
You lose dpi if anything
@@kevinstoops7216 okay that's what I thought. It's not much either and it's still a bit more than 32 inch 1440p so I'm cool with that. I just have a 4070 and it's perfect for 34 inch but I wouldn't want to lose any fps from there by a bigger screen.
@@calebs2crazy Right yeah, same resolution so power required from gpu is the same yeah.
As owner of lg ultrawide 34 screen ,I wanted to buy this 34 version ,the only thing that stoping me atm is th 800 curve its way to much, why did you make such a big curve insted of the 1800 you did on previos screens
Yeah 800 only makes sense if you stand at an ungealthy distance from the screen lol. Even 1500 would be ok, 800? Hell no.
@@enricod.7198 Arms length is correct distance for monitor use for either of these screens. At arms length, all areas of the screen on an 800r curve are equal distance from your eyes as well as pointing directly towards you.
its realy not to much, its pretty good i thought so too at first ut its kind of better.
Waiting for the product to purchase as soon as possible
never buy something as soon as possible. Production quality improves over time and often the first batches are the most flawed with dead pixels, faulty OS etc.
We want a 37-39" 3840x1600 OLED with the 800R curve, that would be sick!
Nobody wants that. Hence why they are not on the market
@@BelfackeR Hell yeah people want that. 39" at 3840x1600 is perfect.
What games are they playing?
With All respect please launch this moniter in INDIA!!
I just bought an Asus 540hz to secondary a LG C9.. can you guys m,ake a 24 in OLED please? thanks
EU release date?
This T.V. looks very serene and massively high-speed.
이 TV는 매우 고요하고 엄청나게 빠른 속도로 보입니다.
I want flat/glossy gaming monitor 27" 1440p OLED with G-SYNC Ultimate. (240hz or 144hz) make it happen LG.
We are looking for a monitor above 240 hrtz . And can rotate in all angel vertical and horizontal . ❤
800 R curve but with a Glossy panel plz
what is the warranty period for dead pixels???
2 years.
I need 6x HDMI on TV. Xbox, ps5, pc, chromecast, soundbar, and one more for other devices
New LG UltraGear GP10 game speaker 2024????
Heatsink? Glossy?
Where is the 27 ich 1440p?
LG - when is the 5K2K version coming out?
What is this Low PPi version even released for?
Brazil?
Alguma notícia amigo quando que vai chegar no Brasil?
@@HMaximiano Eu não tenho novidades, eles não chegaram no Brasil. Eu já respondi à LG, mas eles não responderam nada e me ignoraram. @LGBrasil
When are you going to release an OLED 39" with 3840x1600 resolution? You just missed the mark on this one. Literally no one asked for a 39" with 3440x1440...
Why are the reds so orange-brownish on this monitor???
Can you make a version without the matter coating please? I think it ruins the image quality.
might as well get a 42" oled tv gonna be way cheaper
The resolution is just too disappointing. For 39'' you gotta have something like 5120 x 2160 for crystal clear images. 1440p would give you full eyes of pixels (even on 34'', 1440p looks very pixelated)
Do you play at 20cm from the sceeen? Lmao. Yeah good luck running that resolution at anything more that 60fps in games that are not the crappy esports ones.
@@enricod.7198 If you put your 1440p 39'' monitor 1.5 meters away from you in order to see it clear, you might as well just get an 29'' LG ultrawide for $250.
3840x1600
38"
Glossy
1800R
Make it happen.
Waiting for curved 5120 x 2160
800R, LG what the hell?
80cm or closer is the ideal distance from a 34" ultrawide, so 800r is the ideal curve.
@@anonymous8780 Like most users, I use monitor not only for gaming and sitting at a distance of 80 cm. Looking at the comments, not many people want such strong curves
LG did you felt in head, 800r for a 21:9 ? Hard pass.
It’s for those who plays racing or enjoys non competitive games.
Wait until you see the pricing. They forgot how cheap you can get the aw3423dwf I guess.
@@christianflex4all I felt $750 was a steal.
@@christianflex4all currently the LG is cheaper
This monitor is amazing
No 1600p, No BUY. WTF is with 1440p only?
Model - Out of stock
No glossy, no buy
Ehh why curved again... can't we have at least one good FLAT 34" 1440p (or even 4k) ultrawide OLED on the market getting sick of that silly curved craze:/
curved screens for ultrawide monitors are more comfortable for your eyes
@@t4llv377slightly if you sit right in the centre for a 1 person not nearly enough to offset annoying bent geometry for productivity use like trading or watching movies with more than one person