@Kevin The patriot we all know what would happen bro and that's sad af, they won't be POWs, they would turn at the very first moment into sexual slaves
You're the only one making sense here. It's not about gender, it's about the benchmarks. If a woman passes the real tests, we shouldn't pretend that they didnt. What we shouldn't do is expect women to have the same passing rate as men
FMs are as tough as any other Marine. Marines have one standard. The other forces should do the same. You want to be 11b? Rise to the standard. Don’t care your sex, size or proclivity. I’ve known lesbians who would be fine dirty, nasty, legs. I’ve also known gays who would s...be terrible. It’s the Queen of Battle! I’m not sure that phrase means what you think it does, Fezzik.
"The men are sometimes almost 6 feet and have longer strides and we can't keep up with them." Well, in the Army Infantry we had short 5'2'', 5'4'' guys who HAD to keep up with the platoon on forced marches, and they did. Often the shorter guys were tougher and better than the taller guys! There is no operational need for women in Infantry units.
I used to play soccer at high school, one day at a mach I was assigned to be the shadow of a small chubby player, I laughed and said: "this gonna be easy", but ten minutes later I was completely exhausted trying to keep up with the small guy.
even if 1% of women who apply can pass out it's not worth spending the huge amount of money to train the other 99%. Whereas a much larger percentage of men are able to pass out of training.
It's actually horrifying. I've recently read online that a number of female soldiers who tried to do combat level training are actually getting badly injured, and they don't tell the officers because they don't want to be seen as weak. The result is that now a number of folks fear they may have long term health problems. We're literally crippling young women (maybe even for life) to support the feminist narrative. Despicable.
The standard for the women who went through ranger school was lowered, they were given a 2 week prep course prior to the school that men don’t get they were shown the land nav course prior to taking it which men don’t get and they were given multiple second chances to pass events they failed which surprise surprise men didn’t get
@@dansweetnam9098 Not to be disrespectful but you have no idea what you’re talking about. Not only because you said “any special forces selection in the world” when there is only one Special Forces Selection. Special Forces are a specific Special Operations Unit within the US military. What you meant was “any *Special Operations Selection*”. But that’s just me nit-picking. More importantly I doubt she’s physically or morally fit enough for anything like that. But lets just say she was, she still wouldn’t make it. She has no will-power or resilience. Special Operations Selection, at least in the US military, is 90% about never giving up. She gave up immediately after taking a single loss in her professional MMA career. She is incredibly talented, but to keep it blunt, that is a rather pathetic move. Long story short, she does not have what it takes.
@@dansweetnam9098 There are NOT plenty of women like that. Elite women competing with elite men, is more like 1/1000000. The ones that are, have a secure high paying career ahead of them in sports or Hollywood. They will not become military, fire fighters or police. At the moment women are, simply put, taking up space for a better man.
@@dansweetnam9098 no she wouldn’t. Being physically tough isn’t nearly enough. Can she go weeks without proper sleep and food in the field while its raining? Doubt it. Theres a difference between athletes and soldiers
This is what they want you to believe.. all part of the depop agenda.. it's not true. There are a lot of good women out there who aren't braindead. Spending less time on the internet helps with that.
My mom once said: Women weren't put on the earth to do what a men can do. They were put here to do what men can't do. If they were, they would be men and not women. Edit: 2.8k likes! Thanks guys.
Yes, if you look it up you will see interviews with unnamed instructors sharing the women had extra training before hand, repeats in sections others did not, meal plans, and they skipped a section or two (I think it was the land navigation portion, but do not quote me on that, double check for yourself).
Did anyone tell the women that Rangers will be 50 miles behind enemy lines to gather intel, a spotter for artillery, conduct hit and run attacks to disrupt enemy forces.
Lmao you think the marines wanted to waste this much time to do this? They did it to make everyone else shut up about this topic and allow our national security on the front lines to stay strong
@@-extreme_gaming-8707 when I say "the government" in this instance I'm not talking about the Marines themselves, I'm talking about the idiot politicians trying to tell the DOD how to do their jobs. I agree with your statement.
@@Noor_Jacobs03 unfortunately, you are absolutely right that they don't care about facts, so trying to prove anything to them with facts and evidence is pointless. We all just need to tell them, "NO" then ignore their banshee wails and get on with business.
Psychological standards have been lowered too. I was in the Army in 1969/70 and have seen some present day videos of Basic training in the Army. The training cadre of today are much less abusive and intimidating towards the trainees than they were decades ago. There was an important purpose behind that kind of treatment back then.
@@videomaniac108 I agree 100%. I feel like civilians and civilian platforms all have their opinions about what is "abusive" in a military environment. Someone needs to remind the media that we are training for war, not potlucks with neighbors. As a Marine, DIs look like cuddle-bunnies on TV/documentaries compared to how they are when no one else is around. Even though I went to MCRD San Diego, you can tell practically as soon as you meet a female Marine- that their standards were not the same. Go on one 3 mile hill hike with a dozen of them and it's guaranteed that at least half will fall out. The motivated female Marines feel the same way, too. They lose respect for them really fast because it makes their demographic look bad. It seems like women that like the idea of being called Marine are being allowed in, rather than actually absorbing what we are. I have a lot of respect for the Marines that are female- who always make a badass effort to keep up with or meet the same standards as us. The only problem is that we're letting in recruits that completely overlooked how you actually become a true warrior. Instead of letting them quit or filter themselves out, the Marine Corps seems to be ignoring those recruits when they are female. As a male recruit, I watched my DIs eat up 16 (I think) recruits in the first week. You don't see drop numbers like that anymore and it's because of this civilian idea of inclusiveness. It's like we're not allowed to make people try harder or let them quit. You shouldn't be dragged into earning the title. You should have busted your a$$ at whatever your instructors told you and your instructors should never be graduating anyone that has proven incapable. No stress cards or skipping the rappel tower- type of crap. You should go home for stuff like that. Our military is not some glorified club that anyone should be allowed to join. I always hear Army saying Marines are crazy and that we get excited when we're shot at. Yes. That's exactly what the Marine Corps wanted out of us. I think every branch should have their niche and only allow in those that belong in a military environment. Committing your time should not automatically mean that you're in.
One of the history type channels had a series called 'Making Marines', it followed a group of men and a group of women. The difference was night and day.
Not to mention, they made it through Ranger School, not RASP. So, they are not even part of the 75th Ranger Regiment; they are not special forces Rangers (not Rangers). Also, I did read somewhere that they transferred into the Air Force to become SOF officers or something. Not sure exactly what they do, but you can search for it.
@@Polemicist_ Myers, Meghann. “First Female Ranger Grads Open up about the Aftermath and Joining the Infantry.” Army Times, Army Times, 19 Mar. 2018, www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/03/13/first-female-ranger-grads-open-up-about-the-aftermath-and-joining-the-infantry/. real facts..
That is true, these women are not rangers. It is also not fare because the instructors are basically forced to have the women pass so they do need to lower the requirements. And also what happens when one women makes it in to an infantry platoon. 39 other men in the twenty’s and one women. Doesn’t sound great if you are that women.
Great so the women can stand in place at the base with their 80lb packs while the men march 30km to the battle. Should be helpful. Absurd doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of this nonsense.
@Ethan K ahahahaha. Ah i know i shouldnt laugh but i FEEL so cynical i just need to make fun of them. I aint being malevolent but come on! Its almost like God made us different!
Yep. So much for "Women can use techniques to cArRy a LaRgE mAn" yes very slowly and they really cant carry the weight LOL! Considering theres gonna be equipment to carry nope shell die barely triying to pick him up and getting lit up while killing her mate as well. Its so annoying by god to point out the obvious!!!!
No, it means she can carry the weight, but she's encumbered, so she cannot effectively carry the weight under the pace of battle without posing a highly significant tactical risk to the mission. Something that cannot be carried would be a car. Or a refrigerator. Or a tank. Or an anvil....
Hahahahahah. I can seee that. I havent had a girlfriend. I wouldnt carry my mom sister aunt or cousin cause well you know. But i know this would happen to me when i do get s girlfriend and eventually wife. It sounds annoying not gonna lie.
Yeah I agree. That wannabe ranger sounded unbearable too. I bet hardly anyone would want her in their team even if she made the standard, when you could just pick a male and have a much easier time.
"Unprecedented scientific study" I'm literally 💀 Everyone knows that it's very rare to come across a woman who can work as hard as a 6ft tall grown man. But they do exist. Extremely rare. I'd say around 1 in 150,000
They actually dont exist tho. A woman capable of competing with a 6ft 200lbs man? Who? Lol And if they do, the rate is WAAAAY lower, like 1 in 10.000.000, and probably even lower.
@@damyandimitrov611 if both received the same training, diet, sleep and everything else, the man will come out on top. Men have been warriors, soldiers, fighters for years, and for good reason.
2:05 No, you can't. You are the perfect example. You were allowed to recycle multiple times during Ranger school without being disqualified like the men. Also, you were allowed "breaks" of 2 to 6 hrs for "hygiene" including showers. Infections take out many in Ranger school due to them not being able to take "hygiene" breaks.
Same. It’s just a fact, if I was at war with America and I could capture myself a sexy blonde, do you think I wouldn’t. Welcome to the fact of biology and genetics. Facts don’t care about your feelings.
Former Soldier here, (and yes, I'm a woman) I'm not surprised at this outcome. It's ok. Men and Women are different. One isn't better than the other, we're just different. We each have our strengths and our weaknesses. God made us this way. Let's encourage each other's strengthens and support each other where we are weak, instead of trying to make everyone the same; because we're not.
Of course men are better soldiers than women, didn't you hear the conclusion? Quit that damaging equality nonsense, brainwashing people with woke nonsense... I don't care what women does better than men, but stop lowering standards and male contributions!
Then why do your people claim to be equal when you are not? Absolute joke. You'd last about 3 minutes in a firefight and get men killed trying to save you.
When she said we can’t last because guys are 6 feet is not an excuse. I was 5’6” in the Marines and I had to make up with it by being conditioned more. I knew shorter dudes than me who could sprint with full combat gear faster than the tall dudes. It’s not a women’s job, at least combat positions should be for men only
For most women it's not a suitable job. For some women, they can keep up and meet standards without the standards being lowered. Thank you for your service!
Dan An that’s bs, look it up, the requirements were lowered to give women a pass. And just because some women could do it, that doesn’t mean the military should waste money on all those who can’t.
@@arisn32 So you're saying that there isn't a single woman who is capable of being in the army? There are plenty of women who are very strong, maybe not as strong as the strongest men, but definitely able to surpass military requirements.
@@Only_God_Is_Allah_SWT Oh, I forgot, every slot receiver is slow as balls because they're short. And Zdeno Chara is famously the fastest man in the world. Just saying "They might become faster lmao" doesn't hold weight when he could to If he's really a veteran good job smashing together 3 brain cells to hurl evidence as half baked as you are.
“Two women passed the army’s toughest test to become Army Rangers.” No... they made it though Ranger School, not RASP. They aren’t even rangers yet. Even that is no where near the toughest school.
I just got out of RASP females were there two female medics were in phase two when I had left. They had it rougher but he'll they made it. Still couldn't do alot of the obstacles though. Either way I ain't mad at it.
I feel like to the news the air force training is the military's toughest test in the world at this point, literary every headline no matter if its some kinda truck driver its the toughest test in the world, imagine if they realised what Delta goes through ffs and Navy SEALs
They should have compared all male company, all female company and mixed company to get a real picture of what it would be like to have front line women.
Women can be great at military: as nurses, administration, HR, psychologists, cooks, radar operators, telecommunications officers, drivers, technical service... Essentially jobs which do not require peak physical strength, endurance, speed and agility in order not to jeopardize other unit members with significantly subpar performance. Those who meet the standards - by all means, welcome to the front lines, but those who don't, see above.
Instead of saying what women can be great as, let's just say that "the most qualified person will get the job". That way, if a man is a better army doctor, then he will get the position. If it's a woman, then a woman will get the position.
My history teacher told us to stand up if we don't think women should be allowed to fight in the military. All the boys stood up while literally none of the girls stood up.
Next question your history teacher should ask the class, stand up if you can do over 45 push-ups.Trust me, all the girls will be seated. Can you figure that out.
the women who “passed” ranger school were carried through. there wasn’t a single one that passed everything first try. if a man fails one of the events that’s it, he’s done. the women got multiple tries, they got extra food, and they got to study the nav course beforehand. they didn’t earn anything
EXACTLY!!!!....its like the woman who went through special forces...what people dont understand is that your team is only as strong as its weakest link...aint no woman in full battle gear is going to be able to drag a man in full battle gear out of arms way if needed to...being a woman as a ranger or special forces is like making D-'s when everybody else is making A+'s
@@drawingdead9025 That's been my feelings on the matter for some time but the left doesn't care about my feelings. Maybe I should cry and act hurt, maybe that would get their attention. lol!
No, you can't "carry the weight". Carrying the weight, means successfully carrying it AT the same pace. It's a "go or no-go"...don't pretend that you can.
We can go easy on her. For I suppose she's not technically wrong, and I for one appreciate her clarification as opposed to just saying "we can't." Her way of putting it is more specific. With her way of putting it, its easier to see now that's it's just like being over encumbered in a RPG. Sure, you can throw 80 lbs of gear on a woman's back and expect her to "carry" it, strictly speaking. But to put it in Dark Souls terms, "she's fat rolling." And fat rolling kids, is never worth it. =) ~~And Now You Know~♡
@@TheTrueHolyDarkness ....We don't need to go easy on her, she knew what it was about. It's "put up or shut up" with these broads. They will be the 1st ones crying "I'm just a girl" when the real bullets fly.
@@TheTrueHolyDarkness Go easy on her? That's stupid, if she can't carry the same weight at the same pace, then she's a liability to the team, as now the whole team have to wait for her and now the operation is delayed by however long she takes, you can say oh make the load less for her, but then your getting rid of important gear why do that when you could get a man instead to carry everything and at the same pace as the other men?
In almost every conversation a woman will move the gold post to fit her narrative. Just pay attention, even your mother will do the same in front of your eyes
I am sexist! Sexism is natural, not a manipulative crap propaganda with rallies created to brainwash people If artificial propaganda femin 'ism' is fine ....so is natural sex'ism'
Honestly though. Bill Burr has a fantastic routine on this where he talks about how it's "unacceptable in any circumstance for a man to hit a woman" but we gotta be all about equality and that doesn't seem very equal.
@@ottopotatum5775 Well a guy that I know was in a tram once, and a woman came in in her 30s or 20s ( I don't really remember) and then she said I want to sit with literally no expressions like if she was giving him orders, and he did he gave her his seat and when he looked down he saw her liking feminists posts on Instagram about how strong women are, and that they don't need men and can do everything men can, like she just asked him to give her her place couldn't she stand? That's contradictory.
Women: we're stronger Armorer: Here's your M249 SAW with 200 rounds, here's addtional 4 200 round mags, here's your tactical vest, your plate, your extra pouches and your radio. Women: Urrrggh Sarge: Did I just hear weakness? You're assigned to it, now go!
@@jc.1191 Imagine your surrounded by viet cong in a building u have a m16 and a dream but wait u need to put on a pad so u reload and put on ur pad but damm they rush u u have no hope u fire blindly at the enemies while blood covers your camo pants u did it u survived
the study pitted battle hardened troops against desk clerks and trainees so this proved nothing outside "experience matters" you would see similar margins if the "female" force was replaced with dudes something to note that the female force was not WORSE then the male force it was just less efficient and slower to react (things that come with experience)
@@d1c186 I heard they failed and were given several times to pass,as well as prior exposure,something they're male counterparts would never be given. Defeats the whole purpose. We all know the military will cover things up. In 89 in Panama the press boldly proclaimed out of the 30 kia's none were woman,even though there was no female grunts. As a decade or so passed the truth surfaced that some of the Woman that drove transports trucks refused to leave the base on hearing gunfire.I guess the next conventional conflict we'll have to really get KOed by our enemy in battle to throw this B.S to the side,and go back to a meritocracy. I saw the new coeds marine corp bootcamp,they look like they're going through the motions. Saw another video on an Army physical fitness test,Im 56 and could pass it,if that will tell you anything.
breaking news: captain obvious has discovered for the US military that women on the battlefield are not as combat-effective as men. in other news, water has been found to make things wet, very much unlike weaboos
I love how it’s “discouraging” to women, as if most civilian women really want to pound ground in the infantry but are tragically prevented from doing so...you’re sad lacking an opportunity you don’t even want to use 🙄
She literally says “For those arguing that women should be able to do all the same combat jobs as men the news is discouraging.” Maybe pay attention before making a smart comment.
@@adamhull735 and that doesn’t even refute my point, sir white knight, because many of the women arguing women should serve in frontline combat don’t even intend to do so themselves. They’re arguing on the principle that it’s an opportunity denied to women, and could care less about actually using said opportunity
Well, to put it in another way, feminism is about freedom. It’s about not being limited by sex as a factor. Feminism is often misused/misinterpreted in these situations. It does not mean that women should have lower standards just so that they can compete with men. Any job application should be assessed on merit alone. If you are not able to pass the standards then you can’t join, regardless of sex, it’s that simple. With physical jobs it’s only natural you will see more men than women because men have a easier time fulfilling the requirements. In this case the military should have equal standards for men and women, and if they worry about combat effectiveness then just raise the standards.
Women: we can do anything a man can do. Reality: no ma'am that is false. Women: yes we can Marines: ok lets see Women: fk, well it must be mens fault somehow.
@Jay_Cruz according to human biology that girls have weaker upper body strength and the express more emotions than boys so females over react sometimes and they are more prone to mental and emotional problems :/
Wetness is a condition that occurs when water adheres to something. It doesn't really adhere to itself per se. It can't "be wet"... it can only wet other things.
That's one of the reasons the majority of women didn't want the right to vote, because it also came with the draft and other responsibilities. But because the US is and was so misogynistic they voted to give women the right to vote without any of the accompanying responsibility.
@@coopercook216 What, to back up that "the majority of women didn't want the right to vote"? Um, yes. Im gonna need a source for that one.. How could you not need a source to back that sort of claim up? Thats a pretty controversial claim that they are making there.
Brent Blackwolf for the benefits, wage, etc. i feel most women don’t take these types of jobs because of the risk of death or injury. similar to careers like construction working and other potentially hazardous jobs.
They wouldn't even think to cover this today. Wouldn't even consider it. They won't even admit there's a distinct difference in men and women. I am scared for what it'll be in another 7 years.
Fr I’m gonna be a marine when I turn 18 and I don’t wanna have to fight with a woman that can’t keep up and cant hit her shots I’d rather have cpt price with me
@@aidenog7380 newsflash: you’re not going to have captain price, you’re going to have a college drop out with a 0.2 GPA next to you. Have fun licking boots
@@colonelmilk2586 you’d be surprised how many smart mfs there are in the military. There’s a reason we have the best military in the world. High school and college aren’t a testament to how smart someone is. The people with the highest gpa in college almost always end up working for the high school graduate that was smart enough to invent something and make people work for him.
“Humans have been fighting wars since the dawn of humanity; nearly 200,000 years. Did they really need a study to learn something that had been known for all that time?”
Every time we go to war they commission a study to remind themselves they need snipers, so I'm going with “yes” in this one... it's sad, but they seem to forget everything they know every 20 years.
It's no use. they use ego instead of brain. Like overpraising the 'accomplishments' when it's barely an effort in military. I mean for what? For a bullet through your chest? It's not about serving the country, it's about beating men. People had shoved buckets of red pills down their throats. They just didn't swallow
@@unclelarry8842 I just frustrated about it. Their performance could affect not only her own life, but also her team's life. I got a family member serving the military as a UN peacekeeping force, I heard some stories about how things going on in middle East from him. these people just going on and on about how it's male dominated crap and should lower the standards and such just for the sake of make it easy for the girls. Why are they so stubborn about it? All these equality crap.
In sports we've noticed that because of diet-nutrition-tech-training etc we're making athletes faster and stronger, records continue to be broken..so there is no damn reason to lower the physical requirements for military, we should be raising them
Weren't the standards for the women that passed Ranger school significantly lowered? The men had to build tents for them so they could change clothes comfortably in combat situations, they got more sleep, less hazing, were given 4 chances to pass the 1st phase, had to carry half as much weight in a march in double the time?
Yeah I imagine that, the military spending A boatload of money on some thing and it really being cost in effective for the taxpayers. They never do that
Fun fact: It was exposed that the females who passed Ranger school - note that passing Ranger school does not make you a Ranger - were passed despite the fact that had they been males they would have washed out.
but that one in 1000 still does not pass the same tough tests the men pass so it is a lie, a con, a shame, a hoax. women in military is death to men just because little jane wants to play gi joe the movie was hoax and so is this
My buddies were in a stinger team in the USMC and when they did training exercises the guys had to carry the 2 girls equipment because it got too heavy for them. The only people in combat should be those who can qualify in order to the physical requirements of said job. Dont care if its a man or woman but they NEED to able to do the task required by the job and have the strength to do so.
I’m not sure about the needs of the military, but if you need more people or more talent, lowering physical requirements may be one way to get more recruits or bring in more skill sets
@@0IIIIII Its the military which is a fighting force, they all need to battle ready. So they should all be fit. We have lowered the standards so much that we have severely weakened our fighting force and thats a horrible idea...sad fact is that too many people this day and age are not as fit as we used to be as a nation which is bad for us in the longrun..
@@thecossackcrusaderofholybr8448 meaning that men are the superior soldiers, i dont understand why people debate this, would you feel safer if 6 women soldiers came to rescue you, or 6 men soldiers
@@heartlesshalf-breed514 the racist card has zero effect on me anymore 😂 My whole life I’ve never been a racist but now everything is racist and the mob will literally change definitions before they’ll admit they’re wrong. Embrace the name calling and laugh it off
I'm surprised that there was not a single female Marine that simply stated the self-evident fact that the men could preform their task better BECAUSE THEY ARE MEN. One women said ~"some of these guys are 6 foot whatever, and it's hard for us to keep up". I'd wager money that some of those guys were under 5'6" and still outperformed 99.9999% of the females. Maybe there were females that's said this, but for some reason clips of those views weren't shown....?
@@heatherdaniels8805 women do not raise better children . all boys turn into beta male idiots when they are raise by a women. look around u half the nba nfl players has no father and guess what they are all cry babies sensitive idiots. compare to Magic johnson michael jordan who HAD FATHERS growing up
Heather Daniels huh? What? One has nothing to do with the other as women aren’t better natural caretakers compared to men but men are physically stronger on average compared to women
@@heatherdaniels8805 your opinion is just that. it has no data backing it up except abunch of full-o-chit liars who will say whatever they have to. I have raised my children alone, done a good job. and don't confuse the selfless women of the past w the narcissitic girls of today. these current girls are not willing to be women, because it oppresses them somehow.
It's almost like men and women are biologically different...
I think you’re onto something but I don’t know what exactly it is yet hmm
Perhaps
Not to Liberals.
Amazing
Impossible
That’s it everybody, war is canceled for being sexist
At last... World Peace at it's finest 🗿
Women soldiers as POW could be raped by the entire regiment
@@salsaniggas8544 oh my didn't even think about that, Facts
No more wars bc woman's feelings get hurt
@Kevin The patriot we all know what would happen bro and that's sad af, they won't be POWs, they would turn at the very first moment into sexual slaves
I think women in the military is ok but lowering the standards is complete BS if you want to do the same thing a man then do the same thing
Agreed. Lowering standards is dangerous. Because now you have liabilities and under prepared people in the battlefield
You're the only one making sense here. It's not about gender, it's about the benchmarks. If a woman passes the real tests, we shouldn't pretend that they didnt. What we shouldn't do is expect women to have the same passing rate as men
FMs are as tough as any other Marine. Marines have one standard. The other forces should do the same. You want to be 11b? Rise to the standard. Don’t care your sex, size or proclivity. I’ve known lesbians who would be fine dirty, nasty, legs. I’ve also known gays who would s...be terrible.
It’s the Queen of Battle!
I’m not sure that phrase means what you think it does, Fezzik.
But that’s the point of the study so that they can’t even if they “can do the same thing” they’re still subpar to the men
@@francisluglio6611 That, my friend, Is an absolute Fact.
"The men are sometimes almost 6 feet and have longer strides and we can't keep up with them." Well, in the Army Infantry we had short 5'2'', 5'4'' guys who HAD to keep up with the platoon on forced marches, and they did. Often the shorter guys were tougher and better than the taller guys! There is no operational need for women in Infantry units.
A man will take the challange and fight it and women seem to complain about it.
Yup. I'm 5'6, and I was in the infantry. My wife is 5'11 and fit, but she can't keep up with me. Height isn't everything.
I used to play soccer at high school, one day at a mach I was assigned to be the shadow of a small chubby player, I laughed and said: "this gonna be easy", but ten minutes later I was completely exhausted trying to keep up with the small guy.
I was a squad leader at 5' 6" at boot camp in 86.
Shorter people are scary in battle, imagine having a small body and being as nimble as your taller soldiers
We just discovered that in Africa every 60 seconds a minute passes
legend, ha.
😁😁
Oh my god, this kind of thing happening and no one didn't do anything about it smh
@@captainstag8189 we have to stop it...
Lmfao
Huh after millions of dollars and months of research just to find out what we have known for thousands of years
Dude, you should have been in charge of this project. Women cant fight like men, PERIOD.
Hahahaha
even if 1% of women who apply can pass out it's not worth spending the huge amount of money to train the other 99%. Whereas a much larger percentage of men are able to pass out of training.
Perfect comment.
@@jeffollerich7920 sorry but they dont . they can perform like man but not for a long time . you put soldiers in danger with this risks
When you pour water into a glass, water is in the glass.
Mind = blown
Be shapeless like water, my friend.
@@derrickdavis664
Nooice...
We need government funding to prove this theory.
@@Zminator1986 yeah we most definitely need it
“If men can do it so could we”
Dies in basic training
And they have different (Low) standards in training to pass.
💀💀
That's there pride, ego and stubbornness
Live for it and die for it😎💯
That's what human is born for
It's actually horrifying. I've recently read online that a number of female soldiers who tried to do combat level training are actually getting badly injured, and they don't tell the officers because they don't want to be seen as weak. The result is that now a number of folks fear they may have long term health problems. We're literally crippling young women (maybe even for life) to support the feminist narrative. Despicable.
one female literally became INFERTILE from the training..haha it's crazy
Elephants on average are heavier than mice. I need some funds to prove this theory. I take Paypal and Cashapp...
How much heavier?
This is very interesting, I will give you 2 million dollars🤔
😂😂😂
Or you could ask kindergardners for the price of a box of lollipops and get the same results.
Elephants are useless in the Oil Stain Progression. If any U.S Generals know what it is.
How is this a “disturbing result”
It's the delusional world that we live in.
They called it a disturbing result? LMAO
Because it doesnt fit theyr axiomatic worldview
lmao
She said discouraging
I respect the women who said they didn't want the standard lowered, much respect.
The standard for the women who went through ranger school was lowered, they were given a 2 week prep course prior to the school that men don’t get they were shown the land nav course prior to taking it which men don’t get and they were given multiple second chances to pass events they failed which surprise surprise men didn’t get
@@dansweetnam9098 Not to be disrespectful but you have no idea what you’re talking about. Not only because you said “any special forces selection in the world” when there is only one Special Forces Selection. Special Forces are a specific Special Operations Unit within the US military. What you meant was “any *Special Operations Selection*”. But that’s just me nit-picking. More importantly I doubt she’s physically or morally fit enough for anything like that. But lets just say she was, she still wouldn’t make it. She has no will-power or resilience. Special Operations Selection, at least in the US military, is 90% about never giving up. She gave up immediately after taking a single loss in her professional MMA career. She is incredibly talented, but to keep it blunt, that is a rather pathetic move. Long story short, she does not have what it takes.
@@dansweetnam9098 There are NOT plenty of women like that. Elite women competing with elite men, is more like 1/1000000. The ones that are, have a secure high paying career ahead of them in sports or Hollywood. They will not become military, fire fighters or police. At the moment women are, simply put, taking up space for a better man.
@@dansweetnam9098 no she wouldn’t. Being physically tough isn’t nearly enough. Can she go weeks without proper sleep and food in the field while its raining? Doubt it. Theres a difference between athletes and soldiers
@@dansweetnam9098 lol dude are you high?
Modern women want
1. The authority of a man
2. The privileges of women
3. The accountability of a child
This is what they want you to believe.. all part of the depop agenda.. it's not true. There are a lot of good women out there who aren't braindead. Spending less time on the internet helps with that.
I understand they wish to have all these but I dont understand men who support them to achieve all these 3
@@altiyoltercume4861 it's a mating strategy on paper
@@piitii8141 poiticians? are they doing it for mating?
They want to be able to experience things equally which I support. That doesn't mean they're the same. I think they know that bud
My mom once said:
Women weren't put on the earth to do what a men can do. They were put here to do what men can't do.
If they were, they would be men and not women.
Edit: 2.8k likes! Thanks guys.
👏
Who's your mom? Why's she so wise in the way of philosophy?
nicely said
That's just it, we're dealing with people who don't want to coperate with their design. They have things to prove.
Who are you? So wise in the way of science
didn't the two women who "passed" the army ranger training only succeed because the requirements were lowered for them?
Yes, if you look it up you will see interviews with unnamed instructors sharing the women had extra training before hand, repeats in sections others did not, meal plans, and they skipped a section or two (I think it was the land navigation portion, but do not quote me on that, double check for yourself).
YES ABSOLUTELY!!!
Jordan Fletcher they got more than 15 seconds to eat? Someone take there tabs
If you're a man and everyone knows your name you're gonna have a bad time
@@imgladandrewgillumisnotmyk5787
*WHAT*
I’m not sexist but women being in the military with lowered standards is a hazard
the standards won't be lowered in an actual battle situation
@@saikatdominicgregory9157 yeah so why should they be lowered in training?
@@thatkidfromballahack4379 appeasement policy, for getting votes
Nice profile pic
@@TrulyBalanced you too
The female Army Rangers who "passed" is highly questionable and their records mysteriously got destroyed. That fact conveniently gets left out.
Did anyone tell the women that Rangers will be 50 miles behind enemy lines to gather intel, a spotter for artillery, conduct hit and run attacks to disrupt enemy forces.
Only the government needs to WASTE this much time and money to "discover" something everyone else already knew.
Lmao you think the marines wanted to waste this much time to do this? They did it to make everyone else shut up about this topic and allow our national security on the front lines to stay strong
@@-extreme_gaming-8707 when I say "the government" in this instance I'm not talking about the Marines themselves, I'm talking about the idiot politicians trying to tell the DOD how to do their jobs. I agree with your statement.
@@OmegaTou, haha okay sounds good!
OmegaTou
It was to prove to these radical feminists. You know, the women who prefer feelings over facts.
@@Noor_Jacobs03 unfortunately, you are absolutely right that they don't care about facts, so trying to prove anything to them with facts and evidence is pointless. We all just need to tell them, "NO" then ignore their banshee wails and get on with business.
“Standards should not be lowered”
*Reality: standards are already lowered for females for physical fitness.
And hair length. A man a cant have a beard and mullet but a woman can have long hair as long as its in a bun
100% and they only carry females during the CFT.
Psychological standards have been lowered too. I was in the Army in 1969/70 and have seen some present day videos of Basic training in the Army. The training cadre of today are much less abusive and intimidating towards the trainees than they were decades ago. There was an important purpose behind that kind of treatment back then.
@@videomaniac108 I agree 100%. I feel like civilians and civilian platforms all have their opinions about what is "abusive" in a military environment. Someone needs to remind the media that we are training for war, not potlucks with neighbors. As a Marine, DIs look like cuddle-bunnies on TV/documentaries compared to how they are when no one else is around. Even though I went to MCRD San Diego, you can tell practically as soon as you meet a female Marine- that their standards were not the same. Go on one 3 mile hill hike with a dozen of them and it's guaranteed that at least half will fall out. The motivated female Marines feel the same way, too. They lose respect for them really fast because it makes their demographic look bad. It seems like women that like the idea of being called Marine are being allowed in, rather than actually absorbing what we are. I have a lot of respect for the Marines that are female- who always make a badass effort to keep up with or meet the same standards as us. The only problem is that we're letting in recruits that completely overlooked how you actually become a true warrior. Instead of letting them quit or filter themselves out, the Marine Corps seems to be ignoring those recruits when they are female. As a male recruit, I watched my DIs eat up 16 (I think) recruits in the first week. You don't see drop numbers like that anymore and it's because of this civilian idea of inclusiveness. It's like we're not allowed to make people try harder or let them quit. You shouldn't be dragged into earning the title. You should have busted your a$$ at whatever your instructors told you and your instructors should never be graduating anyone that has proven incapable. No stress cards or skipping the rappel tower- type of crap. You should go home for stuff like that. Our military is not some glorified club that anyone should be allowed to join. I always hear Army saying Marines are crazy and that we get excited when we're shot at. Yes. That's exactly what the Marine Corps wanted out of us. I think every branch should have their niche and only allow in those that belong in a military environment. Committing your time should not automatically mean that you're in.
One of the history type channels had a series called 'Making Marines', it followed a group of men and a group of women. The difference was night and day.
"This is why girls run 5 less laps around the field and still can get perfect score on the Physical Education test"
-P.E Teacher
Dang at my school its 20 less
@@foldedcandle when I was in HS it was probably 1 for every 3 that the guys ran. An yet we still got yelled at for taking a 30 second breather...
@GhostDogg o exactly. My default question is, if we are so equal where are the female seals. Tends to shut up the plebs.
@Jakson McLane wot
@@cek0792 I think he meant that at his school the girls didn't have to run
WHO needed a study to figure this out? As a woman, I could have told them that.
A study to scam the gov. out of billions of dollars of tax payers money!
Woman: “It’s takes a special mindset, a special drive”
Men : “failed college, why not”
lol true
Jokes on u..:. None of us even made it passed 11th grade
Ya beta
The world’s most truthful statement.
everything about women have to be special, they seem to be rewarded more often in the workplace than men
Hehehehehhehehheeheehheeheheheehheh
Those two women who made rangers made it on LOWERED REQUIREMENTS, just so that is said.
Not to mention, they made it through Ranger School, not RASP. So, they are not even part of the 75th Ranger Regiment; they are not special forces Rangers (not Rangers). Also, I did read somewhere that they transferred into the Air Force to become SOF officers or something. Not sure exactly what they do, but you can search for it.
@@Polemicist_ Myers, Meghann. “First Female Ranger Grads Open up about the Aftermath and Joining the Infantry.” Army Times, Army Times, 19 Mar. 2018, www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/03/13/first-female-ranger-grads-open-up-about-the-aftermath-and-joining-the-infantry/. real facts..
@@alpha_a1106 Appreciate it. So, they became officers in the 82nd Airborne.
That is true, these women are not rangers. It is also not fare because the instructors are basically forced to have the women pass so they do need to lower the requirements. And also what happens when one women makes it in to an infantry platoon. 39 other men in the twenty’s and one women. Doesn’t sound great if you are that women.
SAME AGREED!!!
The navy did a study about battlefield tactics and found that water is wet.
🤣🤣🤣
Water is actually not wet
🤣
Waterboarding is not battlefield tactics
How stupid 😅
"I can't deploy, I'm pregnant."
Facts
Femenists: Wait, male is stronger?
Biology: Always has been
Clean up on isle 6
Yes
AOT reference lol
Testosterone
Lol
"We can carry the weight, it's the pace"
So you can't carry the weight.
Great so the women can stand in place at the base with their 80lb packs while the men march 30km to the battle. Should be helpful. Absurd doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of this nonsense.
@Ethan K ahahahaha. Ah i know i shouldnt laugh but i FEEL so cynical i just need to make fun of them. I aint being malevolent but come on! Its almost like God made us different!
Yep. So much for "Women can use techniques to cArRy a LaRgE mAn" yes very slowly and they really cant carry the weight LOL! Considering theres gonna be equipment to carry nope shell die barely triying to pick him up and getting lit up while killing her mate as well. Its so annoying by god to point out the obvious!!!!
@Vick Murray Amen brother
No, it means she can carry the weight, but she's encumbered, so she cannot effectively carry the weight under the pace of battle without posing a highly significant tactical risk to the mission.
Something that cannot be carried would be a car. Or a refrigerator. Or a tank. Or an anvil....
Any man who has walked one block with his wife or girlfriend already completed this study
Omfg I'm on the floor laughing!!!!
An it was her idea to start exercising in the first place!!!!!
Lmfao
Hahahahahah. I can seee that. I havent had a girlfriend. I wouldnt carry my mom sister aunt or cousin cause well you know. But i know this would happen to me when i do get s girlfriend and eventually wife. It sounds annoying not gonna lie.
🤣
America: New study finds that men are stronger than women
Russia: Laughs in Putin
I'm sure the Russians would love combat with a mixed unit, so when they defeat them I would feel sorry for the girls.
@@JH-kh9lf is this a reference to Rape of Berlin?
@@APersonOnRUclipsX No just in general, it's not good for women to be in that situation. Many armies today would abuse women if captured that's all.
The whole world laughes at us.
@@JH-kh9lf "Many armies" seriously, just many, everysingle one of them would turn then into slaves, read some history.
Poor women train like crazy just to pass a test, but the Test isn’t the job.
Yeah I agree. That wannabe ranger sounded unbearable too. I bet hardly anyone would want her in their team even if she made the standard, when you could just pick a male and have a much easier time.
@@tatskamaster agree
@@tatskamaster agreed
@@tatskamaster She isnt a Rnager, not in the 75th just some one who probably got carried through ranger school.
Absofuckinglutely!!!
Next on news, a shocking study finds that water is wet.
Water makes things wet its not wet itself
Sunrise Is a Show does this make all liquids "not wet"
@@grzmotgaminglover6894 thats actually a good question, but I would still say that liquids arent wet
COPY ALERT
@@Kutchy7765 I think you need to google "liquid"
in other news, water is wet...
kjosephson89
fire is hot too.
kjosephson89 ice is cold aswell!
Mark Zuckerberg is not Human
Yellow Conservative your mom is gay.
Stabbing yourself with a pencil hurts.
"Unprecedented scientific study"
I'm literally 💀
Everyone knows that it's very rare to come across a woman who can work as hard as a 6ft tall grown man. But they do exist. Extremely rare. I'd say around 1 in 150,000
no I dont know that. No woman out there naturally can compete with a 6ft tall grown man with grit and integrity.
@@bornfree8073 exactly
They actually dont exist tho. A woman capable of competing with a 6ft 200lbs man? Who? Lol
And if they do, the rate is WAAAAY lower, like 1 in 10.000.000, and probably even lower.
You're telling me the gender that is stronger and faster.... is faster and stronger......... Shocking
Most of the time.. :D There are women who are stronger and faster than men (if the men are couch potatoes and the women train enough)
@@damyandimitrov611 if both are couch potatoes the men win
@@damyandimitrov611 if both received the same training, diet, sleep and everything else, the man will come out on top. Men have been warriors, soldiers, fighters for years, and for good reason.
@@PUNISHERMHS_2021 @Bisoso, I agree with both of you
@@salsaniggas8544 true😂😂
Fun fact: They still knew this in 10,000 bc.
Much of this knowledge was lost with the library of Alexandria, but people then still figured it out somehow
@@stefanogalliano5634 There were many libraries that was a replica of the library of alexandria.
@@eliasziad7864 happened to be a joke containing loose references to historical elements
@@stefanogalliano5634 I am a virgin, are you also a virgin?
@@eliasziad7864 yes
“When you drink water, you’re hydrated.” -George Washington probably
Unless you dont drink water then you aren’t hydrated
Water taste nothing like your life. -Jesus christ
And eddie hall continues to be dehydrated, even after drinking.
2:05 No, you can't. You are the perfect example. You were allowed to recycle multiple times during Ranger school without being disqualified like the men. Also, you were allowed "breaks" of 2 to 6 hrs for "hygiene" including showers. Infections take out many in Ranger school due to them not being able to take "hygiene" breaks.
She is full of it. Specially knowing her self that she was been recycle till some higher rank said check mark as pass
Women : needs a special drive to enter the military
Men : I'm broke, homeless and failed college why not.
LMAO
There are quite a few Marines who did not fail college much less life. I understand tohe point of reality drives progress as your point.
Yet many men dont pass. They go to technical units
@@ottopotatum5775 and? It's obvious there are people who can't meet the requirements men or women
@@ottopotatum5775 I'd bet they would pass if they got given the women's standards LMAO.
It's not like we can't do it, it's just that we can't do it.
Basically
Marine General talking about properly train recruit
2013
"Enemies don't care about women or your 'women problems' in fact, they love if there is a women in a military"
Guts, Berserk
They would even love to capture women from other side and not imagine further......God bless Women
Underrated comment😂
based berserkposter
Same.
It’s just a fact, if I was at war with America and I could capture myself a sexy blonde, do you think I wouldn’t.
Welcome to the fact of biology and genetics.
Facts don’t care about your feelings.
infact since where at war with mostly Muslim country’s where women don’t get equal rights sooo if they happen to capture a woman well
Former Soldier here, (and yes, I'm a woman) I'm not surprised at this outcome. It's ok. Men and Women are different. One isn't better than the other, we're just different. We each have our strengths and our weaknesses. God made us this way. Let's encourage each other's strengthens and support each other where we are weak, instead of trying to make everyone the same; because we're not.
or we are same in dreams or in our imaginations .........
Of course men are better soldiers than women, didn't you hear the conclusion? Quit that damaging equality nonsense, brainwashing people with woke nonsense...
I don't care what women does better than men, but stop lowering standards and male contributions!
To put it bluntly, most women don’t belong in a combat role or anywhere near the frontlines. For F’s sake we’re talking about lives here
Then why do your people claim to be equal when you are not? Absolute joke. You'd last about 3 minutes in a firefight and get men killed trying to save you.
When she said we can’t last because guys are 6 feet is not an excuse. I was 5’6” in the Marines and I had to make up with it by being conditioned more. I knew shorter dudes than me who could sprint with full combat gear faster than the tall dudes. It’s not a women’s job, at least combat positions should be for men only
For most women it's not a suitable job. For some women, they can keep up and meet standards without the standards being lowered. Thank you for your service!
Dan An that’s bs, look it up, the requirements were lowered to give women a pass.
And just because some women could do it, that doesn’t mean the military should waste money on all those who can’t.
What you've never seen you speak.
You are faster than the taller guys?
If they trained more, where you'd be poor thing?
@@arisn32 So you're saying that there isn't a single woman who is capable of being in the army?
There are plenty of women who are very strong, maybe not as strong as the strongest men, but definitely able to surpass military requirements.
@@Only_God_Is_Allah_SWT Oh, I forgot, every slot receiver is slow as balls because they're short. And Zdeno Chara is famously the fastest man in the world.
Just saying "They might become faster lmao" doesn't hold weight when he could to
If he's really a veteran good job smashing together 3 brain cells to hurl evidence as half baked as you are.
We needed a study for this?
I mean I have yet to find an athlete to be caught using estrogen to perform better.
Mad ovulatiom tings
They do. To hide the heightened testosterone after cheating.
@@UnorganizedWaffle read his last statement again LOL.
@@UnorganizedWaffle they mostly use estro blockers to cause 1 fourth of the testosterone you insert turns into estrogen
@@UnorganizedWaffle He did say use estrogen to perform better
“Two women passed the army’s toughest test to become Army Rangers.” No... they made it though Ranger School, not RASP. They aren’t even rangers yet. Even that is no where near the toughest school.
I just got out of RASP females were there two female medics were in phase two when I had left. They had it rougher but he'll they made it. Still couldn't do alot of the obstacles though. Either way I ain't mad at it.
Time Kink Oh damn I had no idea. Well more power to em. Congratulations and good luck with the rest of your training man.
Rigged as usual to produce tokens for photo opps.
Time Kink if they can’t do some of the obstacles how do they stay in selection?
I feel like to the news the air force training is the military's toughest test in the world at this point, literary every headline no matter if its some kinda truck driver its the toughest test in the world, imagine if they realised what Delta goes through ffs and Navy SEALs
I served as an 0351 in my early 20's. Big ups to any women who can keep up with the standards of being an Infantry Marine. It's not easy.
Let's review what we learned:
1. The sky is blue
2. Dark clouds bring rain
And the tire is round.
And I’m poor
@@474yx A man is not rich by what he has, but what he can do with what he has.
@@474yx we said what we learned. Not objective facts.
For some reason when the clouds go dark it sometime dont rain its wierd
Funny to see this 5 years later. This study was disregarded because the results were uncomfortable.
Sadly true.. now we taxpayers have to pay more for these female soldiers for their insurance who have lesser chance of surviving an actual combat
they should send female regiments to the front, then
They should have compared all male company, all female company and mixed company to get a real picture of what it would be like to have front line women.
@@camokoy they did the all males destroyed the all female units
@@jackcraven7979 wow I'm shocked lol, how many women does it take to put in a light bulb 10, one to do it and nine to form a support group.
What’s most alarming is that lots of Americans are surprised by these results.
Because they listen to stupid brainwashing woke theories in main stream media, instead than studying evolution and use their brain!
@@FC-yr3be looks like someone is butthurt because of the truth
@@Ale_100G how is he butthurt?
Mate no one except the feminist believe they are equal to men in strength, even Most women know this.
They watch too many Marvel/DC movies.
Why would you need a study? Shouldn’t it have been freaking obvious?
You needed a study to confirm what we knew in school playgrounds.
Dude in school playground men are not stringer
The difference is after puberty
A multi million dollar study I’m assuming
Women can be great at military: as nurses, administration, HR, psychologists, cooks, radar operators, telecommunications officers, drivers, technical service... Essentially jobs which do not require peak physical strength, endurance, speed and agility in order not to jeopardize other unit members with significantly subpar performance. Those who meet the standards - by all means, welcome to the front lines, but those who don't, see above.
Drivers? Really! But seriously why should a man have to compete and get paid the same as a woman that only meets a lower standard in a safer job.
@@dkoch1271 women also perform more consistently intelligence wise so that's a good move.
Instead of saying what women can be great as, let's just say that "the most qualified person will get the job". That way, if a man is a better army doctor, then he will get the position. If it's a woman, then a woman will get the position.
@@CH-xq6if
Women and men perform identically in intelligence testing.
@@lonetree1941 on a graph the worst performing are boys and so are the very very best but girls come out more constantly above average.
My history teacher told us to stand up if we don't think women should be allowed to fight in the military. All the boys stood up while literally none of the girls stood up.
Really ! ! ! !
Personally as for myself, I would stand up lol. I would not be fit to serve in combat. I am 4'11 feet, 98 lbs and can barely lift 15 lbs lol
Next question your history teacher should ask the class, stand up if you can do over 45 push-ups.Trust me, all the girls will be seated. Can you figure that out.
And how many of those girls made rangers or marines?
@@alejandrathompson7687 THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!!!!
Those woman didn’t pass Ranger school. Lowering the standards doesn’t count.
Women: "we want to be in combat arms as well"
Government: "no"
Women: "please"
Government: "fine"
Women: "nevermind"
Fax
Lmao
And what do women do in the end?
**slaps table**
COMPLAIN
Edit: very sorry meant feminists
@@richardsmith3610 ha !
Your comment Sounds like my gf
Next up: "Chlorine gas may prove to be dangerous with prolonged exposure"
😂
the women who “passed” ranger school were carried through. there wasn’t a single one that passed everything first try. if a man fails one of the events that’s it, he’s done. the women got multiple tries, they got extra food, and they got to study the nav course beforehand. they didn’t earn anything
EXACTLY!!!!....its like the woman who went through special forces...what people dont understand is that your team is only as strong as its weakest link...aint no woman in full battle gear is going to be able to drag a man in full battle gear out of arms way if needed to...being a woman as a ranger or special forces is like making D-'s when everybody else is making A+'s
Would you tell that to the face of the female ranger?
Truth.....I know of a few Retired Rangers who have pointed this out.
@@marschma She would agree with him off camera.
@@marschma Absolutely
In every civilization rises and collapsed there is a women behind.
What an uneducated statement. You're not really into history are you?
Man´s testosterone = 300 to 800 ng/dL / Female´s testosterone 30 to 60 ng/dL
Yea, men pay the testosterone upfront with high childhood mortality and shorter life span. its just nature.
@@amirehosseyni well, your not wrong, we do tend to take more dangerous jobs that kills us, damage us and maim us.
@@jamesmadison7551 Exactly. It's a double-edged blade, nothing to be proud or jealous of, and certainly not a thing to ignore.
It's better that someone's feelings get hurt than get themselves and possibly others hurt in a real battle.
Not to libtards
One of my favorite quote is: "Let them cry here, rather than dying outside."
More about not getting others hurt in combat.
Not to the left, feelings and emotion are all that matter.
@@drawingdead9025 That's been my feelings on the matter for some time but the left doesn't care about my feelings. Maybe I should cry and act hurt, maybe that would get their attention. lol!
No, you can't "carry the weight". Carrying the weight, means successfully carrying it AT the same pace. It's a "go or no-go"...don't pretend that you can.
We can go easy on her. For I suppose she's not technically wrong, and I for one appreciate her clarification as opposed to just saying "we can't." Her way of putting it is more specific.
With her way of putting it, its easier to see now that's it's just like being over encumbered in a RPG.
Sure, you can throw 80 lbs of gear on a woman's back and expect her to "carry" it, strictly speaking.
But to put it in Dark Souls terms, "she's fat rolling."
And fat rolling kids, is never worth it. =)
~~And Now You Know~♡
@@TheTrueHolyDarkness ....We don't need to go easy on her, she knew what it was about. It's "put up or shut up" with these broads. They will be the 1st ones crying "I'm just a girl" when the real bullets fly.
Facts
@@TheTrueHolyDarkness Go easy on her? That's stupid, if she can't carry the same weight at the same pace, then she's a liability to the team, as now the whole team have to wait for her and now the operation is delayed by however long she takes, you can say oh make the load less for her, but then your getting rid of important gear why do that when you could get a man instead to carry everything and at the same pace as the other men?
In almost every conversation a woman will move the gold post to fit her narrative. Just pay attention, even your mother will do the same in front of your eyes
The men had better accuracy. So not only is it that the men are stronger, more efficient, etc, but they are also better at being a soldier essentially
I’m not sexist but by lowering the military Standards,Defeat is inevitable
You are sexist. And so am I
Aidan Hand really ?
Asatru Teutonic 😊
I am sexist, and this stupid
I am sexist!
Sexism is natural, not a manipulative crap propaganda with rallies created to brainwash people
If artificial propaganda femin 'ism' is fine ....so is natural sex'ism'
Women: we want equal rights.
Also women: *Wants men to give up their seat for them*
Honestly though. Bill Burr has a fantastic routine on this where he talks about how it's "unacceptable in any circumstance for a man to hit a woman" but we gotta be all about equality and that doesn't seem very equal.
Who does these days?
Who wants that?
@@ottopotatum5775 Well a guy that I know was in a tram once, and a woman came in in her 30s or 20s ( I don't really remember) and then she said I want to sit with literally no expressions like if she was giving him orders, and he did he gave her his seat and when he looked down he saw her liking feminists posts on Instagram about how strong women are, and that they don't need men and can do everything men can, like she just asked him to give her her place couldn't she stand? That's contradictory.
Open the doors for her to pass misogynistic 🤣😂👎
Women: "We are stronger than men..."
Naturr: "Doesnt work like around here.."
Women: "We are just as good as, if not better than, men."
Hundreds of Thousands of Years of Evolution: "Are you sure about that?"
Women: we're stronger
Armorer: Here's your M249 SAW with 200 rounds, here's addtional 4 200 round mags, here's your tactical vest, your plate, your extra pouches and your radio.
Women: Urrrggh
Sarge: Did I just hear weakness? You're assigned to it, now go!
@@inevitableruin290 if women arent just as good in ur eyes or their life is just as much worth than date a man he will make u happier
@@anahitak9292 I appreciate the suggestion, but I'm straight thanks
@@inevitableruin290 sure
Women: “we can do everything men can”
Me: “wait until you get your period”
Yes, I'm sure that will do wonders for troops in the field.
In all fairness think of how fiercely they're gonna fire at the enemy then. 🤣
@@jc.1191 Imagine your surrounded by viet cong in a building u have a m16 and a dream but wait u need to put on a pad so u reload and put on ur pad but damm they rush u u have no hope u fire blindly at the enemies while blood covers your camo pants u did it u survived
Can women do pushups with their dongs? Nope
exactly...then they do everything men can while bleeding
Men: *have always been stronger than women*
Marines: *conduct a study and find out that men are stronger than women*
Women: *surprised pikachu face*
Well they got some hard data. We knew what the result would be.
Biology: I should leave my job
They probably did it because if they made that statement without "proof" , they'd be called sexist.
the study pitted battle hardened troops against desk clerks and trainees
so this proved nothing outside "experience matters" you would see similar margins if the "female" force was replaced with dudes
something to note that the female force was not WORSE then the male force it was just less efficient and slower to react (things that come with experience)
but now it also prove they are better at aiming
wich i personally wouldnt think
the 2 women were pushed thru for political reasons they did not complete or carry their weight.... go ask those that went tru with them
The standards got lowered for them too
The woman that "became a ranger" just passed ranger school, she didn't enter any ranger regiment which is something absolutely different.
I believe I read both women failed several times. I’m sure they lived up to the original standards of that course when they “passed”.
Great point!
@@jackmeholf5565 they lowered the standards just for them after they failed it a few times
You really believe she passed or was allowed to pass
@@d1c186 I heard they failed and were given several times to pass,as well as prior exposure,something they're male counterparts would never be given. Defeats the whole purpose. We all know the military will cover things up. In 89 in Panama the press boldly proclaimed out of the 30 kia's none were woman,even though there was no female grunts. As a decade or so passed the truth surfaced that some of the Woman that drove transports trucks refused to leave the base on hearing gunfire.I guess the next conventional conflict we'll have to really get KOed by our enemy in battle to throw this B.S to the side,and go back to a meritocracy. I saw the new coeds marine corp bootcamp,they look like they're going through the motions. Saw another video on an Army physical fitness test,Im 56 and could pass it,if that will tell you anything.
breaking news: captain obvious has discovered for the US military that women on the battlefield are not as combat-effective as men. in other news, water has been found to make things wet, very much unlike weaboos
I love how it’s “discouraging” to women, as if most civilian women really want to pound ground in the infantry but are tragically prevented from doing so...you’re sad lacking an opportunity you don’t even want to use 🙄
She literally says “For those arguing that women should be able to do all the same combat jobs as men the news is discouraging.”
Maybe pay attention before making a smart comment.
@@adamhull735 you know I don’t think any of those women are going to hook up with you for defending them, so you can calm down
@@adamhull735 and that doesn’t even refute my point, sir white knight, because many of the women arguing women should serve in frontline combat don’t even intend to do so themselves. They’re arguing on the principle that it’s an opportunity denied to women, and could care less about actually using said opportunity
@@テイラーサム lmao well that's okay. I'm married.
Well, to put it in another way, feminism is about freedom. It’s about not being limited by sex as a factor. Feminism is often misused/misinterpreted in these situations. It does not mean that women should have lower standards just so that they can compete with men. Any job application should be assessed on merit alone. If you are not able to pass the standards then you can’t join, regardless of sex, it’s that simple. With physical jobs it’s only natural you will see more men than women because men have a easier time fulfilling the requirements. In this case the military should have equal standards for men and women, and if they worry about combat effectiveness then just raise the standards.
Women: we can do anything a man can do.
Reality: no ma'am that is false.
Women: yes we can
Marines: ok lets see
Women: fk, well it must be mens fault somehow.
I think the gender equality is broken
@Jay_Cruz according to human biology that girls have weaker upper body strength and the express more emotions than boys so females over react sometimes and they are more prone to mental and emotional problems :/
I’m a woman I’m not a feminist and yes I exist.
@@canismajor8601 then why do men commit suicide more? If they're so mentally strong?
@@adwaitab.3622 I think heartbreak,cheating,divorce?
"An unprecedented scientific study"
Umm pretty sure we figured this one out a long time ago news people.
I think what was unprecedented was how much time and money we wasted trying to prove that everyone was right all along
Since the primitive era of our species I'd say.
@@snubbles9991 that still not early enough bro
What is surprising is that liberal news covered this. This kind of story seems like one that fits Fox news narrative.
Modern humans have been around for at least 300,000 years. We’ve known since then.
They needed months of research for that conclusion. Amazing
I think the study also stated “water is wet” and it’s “harder to see in the dark”. Truly ground breaking research 🔬
LOL!!! Right on the money!! That was hilarious :))))
Wetness is a condition that occurs when water adheres to something. It doesn't really adhere to itself per se. It can't "be wet"... it can only wet other things.
*Women* : we want equal rights
*The government* : hey sign these draft papers
*Women* : we didn't ask for this
That's one of the reasons the majority of women didn't want the right to vote, because it also came with the draft and other responsibilities. But because the US is and was so misogynistic they voted to give women the right to vote without any of the accompanying responsibility.
@@worldfamousgi86 "the majority"- you got a source for that? It sounds pretty unlikely.
@@Ashley-1917 srsly you really need a fact to back that up 😑
@@coopercook216 What, to back up that "the majority of women didn't want the right to vote"? Um, yes. Im gonna need a source for that one.. How could you not need a source to back that sort of claim up? Thats a pretty controversial claim that they are making there.
I think it would be a waste of money for the us military and they would get backlash like women have 2x higher casualty rate vs men
I don't get it why women wants so hard to go to war. War is terrible
Brent Blackwolf for the benefits, wage, etc. i feel most women don’t take these types of jobs because of the risk of death or injury. similar to careers like construction working and other potentially hazardous jobs.
They want to be in the way even if it killz them
CHill TACtics or so they can say they are equals
@CHill TACtics Laying on a battlefield with your guts spilling out is the only way to be patriotic?
Brent Blackwolf for three reason
First equality
Second patriotism
Third they want the benefits that come with it
They wouldn't even think to cover this today. Wouldn't even consider it. They won't even admit there's a distinct difference in men and women. I am scared for what it'll be in another 7 years.
The actual title should be: Women drag down the efficacy of combat units and put all others at risk, women most affected.
Lmfao good lord
Fr I’m gonna be a marine when I turn 18 and I don’t wanna have to fight with a woman that can’t keep up and cant hit her shots I’d rather have cpt price with me
@@aidenog7380 newsflash: you’re not going to have captain price, you’re going to have a college drop out with a 0.2 GPA next to you. Have fun licking boots
@@colonelmilk2586 or my son.... chump.
@@colonelmilk2586 you’d be surprised how many smart mfs there are in the military. There’s a reason we have the best military in the world. High school and college aren’t a testament to how smart someone is. The people with the highest gpa in college almost always end up working for the high school graduate that was smart enough to invent something and make people work for him.
“Humans have been fighting wars since the dawn of humanity; nearly 200,000 years. Did they really need a study to learn something that had been known for all that time?”
The problem with liberals is that 200,000 years of human history and understanding can just be 'reimagined'.
Every time we go to war they commission a study to remind themselves they need snipers, so I'm going with “yes” in this one... it's sad, but they seem to forget everything they know every 20 years.
Can’t people realize that men and women aren’t the same, men are physically stronger and are easily trained. It’s not that hard to see
It's no use. they use ego instead of brain. Like overpraising the 'accomplishments' when it's barely an effort in military. I mean for what? For a bullet through your chest? It's not about serving the country, it's about beating men.
People had shoved buckets of red pills down their throats. They just didn't swallow
@@Piku_gram that's what she said
@@Piku_gram I can’t tell if you’re agreeing with me or not
You are correct yet this is starting to become a once in a lifetime statement.
@@unclelarry8842 I just frustrated about it. Their performance could affect not only her own life, but also her team's life. I got a family member serving the military as a UN peacekeeping force, I heard some stories about how things going on in middle East from him.
these people just going on and on about how it's male dominated crap and should lower the standards and such just for the sake of make it easy for the girls. Why are they so stubborn about it? All these equality crap.
In sports we've noticed that because of diet-nutrition-tech-training etc we're making athletes faster and stronger, records continue to be broken..so there is no damn reason to lower the physical requirements for military, we should be raising them
All that money wasted to learn something you'd learn for free in public school.
Not these days. Schools are brainwashing kids into extreme liberalism and communism
Earnest T Bass exactly.
Not even school, you know this basically at the age you start thinking. Some people seem to not have the thinking ability
Weren't the standards for the women that passed Ranger school significantly lowered? The men had to build tents for them so they could change clothes comfortably in combat situations, they got more sleep, less hazing, were given 4 chances to pass the 1st phase, had to carry half as much weight in a march in double the time?
True
That's just sad. In my opinion, both genders should receive the same intense training and if you can't handle it, quit.
@@osamabinladen824 based Osama
The women passed Ranger school because the command was under pressure from the politicians and service chiefs to get some to pass.
@@CryptoX-kr3wu True, if you're going to push for equal opportunities and then no women pass it's going to make you look stupid.
Lol just imagine how much money was spent to "figure" this out.
Yeah I imagine that, the military spending A boatload of money on some thing and it really being cost in effective for the taxpayers. They never do that
Lol
$100M tax dollars
Yup
Fun fact: It was exposed that the females who passed Ranger school - note that passing Ranger school does not make you a Ranger - were passed despite the fact that had they been males they would have washed out.
Sure blame men for being tall
God damn tall people
While demanding men to be tall at the same time. At least 1.8 meters or you are not a real man!
Women most affected xD
Dude men have more biological in warfare then women do it’s not just being taller it’s also more than I can list then you can read so...
@@fememoboy7601 yea bigger muscles bones better reaction time and speed coordination and can take alot more damage
ah! come on really 1 female out 1000 passes and all females think they can do it....OH HELL NO
It costs tens of thousands of dollars to train just 1 person, so why should we train 1000 women when only 1 can pass out? XD
You gotta remember too it's 1000 tough women and now imagine the regular women?
but that one in 1000 still does not pass the same tough tests the men pass so it is a lie, a con, a shame, a hoax. women in military is death to men just because little jane wants to play gi joe the movie was hoax and so is this
Thats how they win every gender argument .
@@Adventstein Ok do you guys want women in the military/ draft or not?
My buddies were in a stinger team in the USMC and when they did training exercises the guys had to carry the 2 girls equipment because it got too heavy for them. The only people in combat should be those who can qualify in order to the physical requirements of said job. Dont care if its a man or woman but they NEED to able to do the task required by the job and have the strength to do so.
I’m not sure about the needs of the military, but if you need more people or more talent, lowering physical requirements may be one way to get more recruits or bring in more skill sets
@@0IIIIII Its the military which is a fighting force, they all need to battle ready. So they should all be fit. We have lowered the standards so much that we have severely weakened our fighting force and thats a horrible idea...sad fact is that too many people this day and age are not as fit as we used to be as a nation which is bad for us in the longrun..
@@0IIIIII lowering the standards actually worsens units effectiveness. There's a certain level of incompetence that puts others in danger.
@@0IIIIII that's what the draft is for. Alot different then current military personnel.
@@blehblehbleh4442 you are uneducated and your opinion means nothing. Just keep that in mind
Just like sports. We don't see a boxing match between a man and a woman
This is just biology there ain't nobody tryina judge the females
She’s blaming it on the guys’ height. I’m 5’4 and have beat tall guys running numerous times 🤦🏾♂️💀. Ma’am, this goes deeper than height lmao
Just making excuses and back peddling.
That’s feminist for you.
Nah she just means that men are generally more physically fit
@@thecossackcrusaderofholybr8448 meaning that men are the superior soldiers, i dont understand why people debate this, would you feel safer if 6 women soldiers came to rescue you, or 6 men soldiers
@@saunajoe5973 6 men, I believe that women can be just as good a soldier as a men or even better, but VERY rarely do women meet such expectations
There's a reason men's and women's sports have always been separated. It's really not that hard to figure out. 🙄
we can always count on government to spend thousands to "discover" what everyone already knew. 🤦
if i good a us cent for every time what erveryone knew was wrong i would be a millionaire in theEU
It’s a shame that we have to prove things that everyone already knows. Men, in general, are bigger, stronger and faster.
Don't forget tactically smarter as well
Also more dominant
@@Alex_Aramayo no
@@tyzilla87 no
No not true
The title: “Just in: staring at the sun hurts your eyes”
This info is racist. I’m sure of it. Somehow.
@@heartlesshalf-breed514 the racist card has zero effect on me anymore 😂 My whole life I’ve never been a racist but now everything is racist and the mob will literally change definitions before they’ll admit they’re wrong. Embrace the name calling and laugh it off
@@vinysquirrel lol I know right!? Smiling is probably considered racist by somebody somewhere. Just figured I’d try a little satire/sarcasm.
@@heartlesshalf-breed514 I figured you were joking but you never know these days lol thanks for the laugh man 😂
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Does anyone actually find this surprising?
+Tyler Tricquet A bunch of feminist were surprised !
The findings are surprising at all. What surprising is that they actually released the findings. Seeing as the facts weren't politically correct.
I'm surprised that there was not a single female Marine that simply stated the self-evident fact that the men could preform their task better BECAUSE THEY ARE MEN. One women said ~"some of these guys are 6 foot whatever, and it's hard for us to keep up". I'd wager money that some of those guys were under 5'6" and still outperformed 99.9999% of the females. Maybe there were females that's said this, but for some reason clips of those views weren't shown....?
NO
No
"Study needed to display what everybody already knew but became inopportune to say out loud - but lets still ignore it!"
Feminists: "NO! You can't just physically outperform women! That is sexist!"
Male body: "Haha, Testosterone go brrrrr."
This is my favorite comment by sure. You could even say “Haha, Y Chromosome go brrrrr.”
@@tylerthegamer8766 that's kinda true, but testosterone is what gives men a higher muscle mass among other things
@@whitegradient5182 More than that but yeah Testosterone does a lot of the work.
@@cokedupcat I know, it was just another way to phrase the joke, because the Y chromosome is what causes us to become males at the genetic level.
@@tylerthegamer8766 yeah sorry kinda glazed over your original comment I see now that it said "among other things".
If you’re surprised by this you’re actually blind. it’s just anatomy.
JT R,
Being blind, i can Still FEEL the difference ...
Sick job spending thousands of wasted dollars on what we have already known for hundreds of thousands of years.
@@heatherdaniels8805 triggered feminist
@@heatherdaniels8805 women do not raise better children . all boys turn into beta male idiots when they are raise by a women. look around u half the nba nfl players has no father and guess what they are all cry babies sensitive idiots. compare to Magic johnson michael jordan who HAD FATHERS growing up
Heather Daniels huh? What? One has nothing to do with the other as women aren’t better natural caretakers compared to men but men are physically stronger on average compared to women
@@heatherdaniels8805 your opinion is just that. it has no data backing it up except abunch of full-o-chit liars who will say whatever they have to. I have raised my children alone, done a good job. and don't confuse the selfless women of the past w the narcissitic girls of today. these current girls are not willing to be women, because it oppresses them somehow.
@@heatherdaniels8805 yea a child should be raised between both
I'm shocked.
Shocked!
...that this study was allowed to be done, and even more shocked the results were allowed to be shared.
Kudos.