It will dumb down your intelligence and more importantly your capacity to, and awareness of the need to resist! Search Challenger disaster survivers and the Van Allen belts. QI is worse than mythbusters. (Take this seriously; it's not every day somebody is so honest.)
Love Rich Hall. he can sit there for ages not saying anything, but when he does it’s usually very funny. Saw his live show a few years ago, that was hilarious
Never understood why he was on QI. Alan once said in an interview that they stopped having Hall on because he refused to get into the spirit of things. i.e. not at all funny.
"Which Moon?" was absolutely genius. As for not funny: Rich's humour requires active participation. In other words: He forces you to think before you laugh. I can see how this could prevent some people from finding him funny...
What is funny is that Johnny is actually correct about the Sun being the center of the observable Universe because the earth rotates around the sun and we can make observations from earth at any point in its rotation around the sun, leaving the outside of the orbit the observable universe, placing the sun at the center.
Can't go wrong with QI. Absolutely love the show and you learn a lot from it. Sandi is doing a great job and I hope they can get to Z which means they will be one of the longest television shows ever. I think they are on P.
OK, so I'm stating the obvious, but it has to be said: QI is extraordinarily good TV... it's brilliantly silly, engaging and good natured all at the same time. And the tone set by The Frymaster lifted it just that much higher. Sandi Toksvig gets the cigar for successfully taking on Fry's role and, if there is a God - thankyou for Alan Davis in particular - and triple ticks for the panelists who consistently set a standard difficult to match. Pommies set the standard for TV - no question.
Only the base of the lunar lander remains. A portion of it (the landing gear, descent engine, and its fuel supply) was left behind upon departure of the crew capsule. It is very possible that the lunar lander crew capsule is still in orbit around the moon.
Space elevator needs to be at the equator not because it's moving the fastest, but because the "counterweight" needs to orbit around the earth's center of mass. Otherwise you get a curve relative to ground and non-constant distance to the base (you're probably familiar with this from seeing the ISS orbit relative to ground).
No. The "counterweight" would not be in orbit, it would be pulling the elevator cord taut via centrifugal force, tugging away from the Earth's rotational axis. For example, a space elevator anchored near Seattle (at 47 degrees latitude), would still get to space but, near the anchor, the cord would be at about a 43 degree angle to the ground. Anchoring it at the equator would mean the chord goes straight up, saving time and materials, as well as making it less hazardous to airplane traffic.
Holdenon3 there is no such thing as centrifugal force. Also yes the ‘counter weight’ would need to be in orbit otherwise the counter weight wouldn’t be a counter weight, it would collapse to the earth. You need a geosynchronous orbit of a satellite attached to the equator with a rope, the satellite would keep the rope taut.
@@jimraq1 if the earth was flat wouldn't he have to put a ladder on the underside of the planet as putting a ladder on the south Pole in a flat Earth scenario would be exactly the same as any other point of the earth?
I don't think he knew it, I think he inferred from the fact that they're called "Ken and Barbie". "Kell Doll" is a pretty common shorthand for lacking genitals.
Its both ironic and true, as he mentions with the whole "We were the same during our colonial period". The reason its in their DNA is because the colonizers were English and in English humour, self deprecation is normal.
The Rural Buddha Bill Bailey has a point with travelling to space using your own imagination. Olaf Stapleton used a similar idea where in his book 'Star Maker' the main character 'The Traveler' went to the top of a hill and 'projected his thought' out into the universe.
The US government never developed a special pen for space. Some pen company (probably fisher-price) did it on their own to get in on the space craze. I think a regular pen was used by astronauts.
No they used the pressurized pens. the thing is back then ball point pens were very expensive and quite unreliable. It was until BIC used mass production that ball point pens became affordable. The pressurized pen was the only realistic option for the astronauts.
He didn't say that because it's wrong. While light reflecting from these objects would reach your eye, it would be far too dim for your eye to register, and the eye can't discern such small distances from that far away.
There's that scene in the Hitch Hikers Guide where they put Zaphod in the machine that shows you your relationship to the universe. The last clip was wrong. Douglas Adams already answered this question.
Wasn't that only because Zaphod was in the artificial universe designed to hide him? He'd naturally be the most important person in it. As Gag Halfrunt said "Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?"
@@zapkvr Me too! I also have them on cassette recorded off the radio, and somewhere the vinyl version of the first series with Dawn French as Trillian, I was obsessed with it :)
Mars is a red brown though. "Brown" is a vague description that includes many very red hues. "Brown" and "orange" can only be distinguished by saturation and thus by comparison to a dark backdrop. If the sky is black, Mars is definitely red, or red-orange. Just look at it and tell me it's brown.
What man made artifacts can be seen from the moon? Well if someone where standing on the moon they could see: an American flag, mirrors, spacesuits, and the luna orbiter.
Mars is rust colored because the color comes from iron oxide in the rocks and regolith there. NASA tweaks colors to look "correct" but there's a bit of a blue & black vs white & gold dress problem. Illumination affects color so do you want to know what something looks like under ambient lighting on Mars or do you want to know what color something is (the visible spectrum albedo). They are actually two different things. The Viking images were tweaked after they noticed a cable was the wrong color in a photo, modern missions like Curiosity take color calibration photographic targets attached to the rover to help get it right after the Viking lesson. In practice many images are multispectral for scientific analysis and aren't even optimized for human vision, so the visual appearance is a secondary concern, strangely enough. Color is used to help identify minerals as part of the mission's geological analysis, it's not primarily about the beauty shots although they are amazing.
In the 1600s, the poet and swordsman Cyrano de Bergerac wrote that he had travelled to the moon by taking a magnet and sitting on a sheet of metal. He threw the magnet into the air and ascended on the metal plate (which was attracted by the magnet). He then caught the magnet, threw it upward again, and so ascended indefinitely. (He was kidding.)
It amazes me that people are told the photos from Mars are shopped to fall in line with our expectations and it just runs like water off a duck's back. Like i wouldn't have cared if they said "oh btw, it's not red. It's actually just a dusty brown colour", and i don't think many people would. So why even go to trouble? How does it benefit anything or anyone to lie about that? But what's more important than that is the admission that they shop photos to match expectations. Expectations set by the same people. So what else has been shopped? Like i know basically every photo that comes from space is digitally enhanced. But i no longer feel like i can trust those images at all, nor the source of where they're coming from
Man made objects from the moon on the earth? So not made on earth, but actualy made on the moon? Stool/urine samples made by astronaute on the moon where collected in a bag and brougth back to earth fore research where labeld and stored and kept in a freezer . (If a nasa worker dint mastake it fore fudge took it out the freezer and eat it)
The centre of the observable universe is the observer. THe centre of the entire universe, we don't know, the universe seems to be flat as far as we can see in our observable universe, but maybe it's a 4D donut shape, in which case there would be no centre,
I like the "bubble to space" idea at 6:54. Unfortunately a bubble pops when there's more air inside it than there's surrounding air. And many other issues! But fun idea nonetheless.
What if, by some work of fate, Jonny Vegas was right about the sun being the centre of the universe. As it's not provable, it is possible. Though I suspect my genitals are the centre of the universe. 🤣
They were talking about the observable universe, not the whole universe itself. Even so, I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that the universe doesn't have a centre or an edge, so everything is redshifting away from us at the same rate.
@@thidang6247 I am certain I've heard that things are expanding away from us at different speeds, and that the delta in redshift can be used to find the originating direction.
@@adamnshame They are expanding away from us at different speeds, but that's a matter of distance, not direction. Everything that's the same distance is receding at the same speed, regardless of which direction we look. And we can measure distances out to about 10 billion light years using Type 1a supernovae, which all have the same intrinsic brightness.
QI is like the warm hug of television.
It will dumb down your intelligence and more importantly your capacity to, and awareness of the need to resist! Search Challenger disaster survivers and the Van Allen belts. QI is worse than mythbusters.
(Take this seriously; it's not every day somebody is so honest.)
Graeme Waddell Lol you are deluded, you have deprived yourself of the capacity to think...
@@oldpondfrog788 what's wrong with you?
@@JamesForster1123 the hint is in his name, i believe ;)
SpliffHound 420 ...Ackchyually...
I love when Stephen finds himself at the mercy of the panel. His joy whilst calling them “you beasts” is a real delight. ^_^
Alan is like a child with to many questions and a great sense of humor
I've literally watched Allen grow old on this show!
I cannot think of anyone I would rather have in my family than Stephen. I simply adore him!
same here
He’s like the grandfather that tells you stories of his youth
Dalai Farmer. Sean's a genius lmao
@Aslan T Vorlon Sean previously worked as a writer and script editor for Bill Bailey's show _Is it Bill Bailey_ .
And he was so chuffed at himself lol
His sitcom was amazing.
To be fair British people have been making jokes like this for decades.
not a llama farmer then?
Bill Bailey has such good timing. "Against a wall of silence" COME ON. COMEDY GOLD.
Teddo Bomb tis the wisdom of the rural Buddha, the Dalai Farmer 🤣
I fear I don’t get it.
It doesn’t work written down, he says farmer like fama so instead of Dalai Lama it’s dalai fama
Is a fly in space called a 'float'?
Why did this make me laugh so hard?!
Well, technically things don’t float in space, they fall, so a fly in space would be “flyfalling”.
@@nocalsteve a fall
Love Rich Hall. he can sit there for ages not saying anything, but when he does it’s usually very funny.
Saw his live show a few years ago, that was hilarious
Never understood why he was on QI. Alan once said in an interview that they stopped having Hall on because he refused to get into the spirit of things. i.e. not at all funny.
"Which Moon?" was absolutely genius. As for not funny: Rich's humour requires active participation. In other words: He forces you to think before you laugh. I can see how this could prevent some people from finding him funny...
Jeezus , I would like to see James May as a guest on this show.
Why? He doesn't have anything even approaching a sense of humour. He's funny to watch because he's pretty much a dolt who just doesn't get a joke. :)
@@andrewskopal3876 nah
I’d love to see Richard Hammond
69 likes, you have reached the peak of mankind
Maybe the real centre of the universe was the friends we made along the way
*laughing as though scorning a peasant*
I want what he's on
What is funny is that Johnny is actually correct about the Sun being the center of the observable Universe because the earth rotates around the sun and we can make observations from earth at any point in its rotation around the sun, leaving the outside of the orbit the observable universe, placing the sun at the center.
THIS is the Good Place !
Awwwww!
Can't go wrong with QI. Absolutely love the show and you learn a lot from it. Sandi is doing a great job and I hope they can get to Z which means they will be one of the longest television shows ever. I think they are on P.
If Stephen was still on, they would probably move on to the Greek alphabet.
Worth it, if only to see Alan's reaction.
The longest run on TV is meet the press. Seventy years.
@Eric Burkheimer coronation street ran longer than 26 years. And Blue peter
@Eric Burkheimer very funny.
Why not 0 through 9?
Alan "reeling in" Stephen is one of the best bits
There are those who say that the Chinese wall is so big, you can see the moon from there!
And they're lying
@@zapkvr read what I wrote. Not what you think I wrote.
@@sine-nomine they're not lying?
@@zapkvr He switched them around. That's the joke.
@@Khil-Minao you and me have a different definition of the word "joke".
God I love Stephen fry on this show. Reminds me of everybody else in my a level physics class!
OK, so I'm stating the obvious, but it has to be said: QI is extraordinarily good TV... it's brilliantly silly, engaging and good natured all at the same time. And the tone set by The Frymaster lifted it just that much higher. Sandi Toksvig gets the cigar for successfully taking on Fry's role and, if there is a God - thankyou for Alan Davis in particular - and triple ticks for the panelists who consistently set a standard difficult to match. Pommies set the standard for TV - no question.
Couldn't agree more.... However we do get our fair share of garbage over here, but this is certainly a gift that just keeps giving
Brilliant! "Up against the wall of silence." Great song lyrics.
The lunar landers are man made artefacts that can be seen from the moon with the naked eye.
City lights
Did you really think you could see a golf kart from 1/4 million miles away?
The official QI record discloses that The Netherlands is an acceptable answer...
Only the base of the lunar lander remains. A portion of it (the landing gear, descent engine, and its fuel supply) was left behind upon departure of the crew capsule. It is very possible that the lunar lander crew capsule is still in orbit around the moon.
Space elevator needs to be at the equator not because it's moving the fastest, but because the "counterweight" needs to orbit around the earth's center of mass. Otherwise you get a curve relative to ground and non-constant distance to the base (you're probably familiar with this from seeing the ISS orbit relative to ground).
No. The "counterweight" would not be in orbit, it would be pulling the elevator cord taut via centrifugal force, tugging away from the Earth's rotational axis. For example, a space elevator anchored near Seattle (at 47 degrees latitude), would still get to space but, near the anchor, the cord would be at about a 43 degree angle to the ground. Anchoring it at the equator would mean the chord goes straight up, saving time and materials, as well as making it less hazardous to airplane traffic.
Holdenon3 there is no such thing as centrifugal force. Also yes the ‘counter weight’ would need to be in orbit otherwise the counter weight wouldn’t be a counter weight, it would collapse to the earth.
You need a geosynchronous orbit of a satellite attached to the equator with a rope, the satellite would keep the rope taut.
saying "there is no such thing as centrifugal force" would net you a good klaxon-ing on QI.
@@LovableCoolGuy That's because QI is entertainment, not academics.
The clips with starting times, in order shown, are: 0:00 B4 2004, 1:01 A2 2003, 1:50 C4 2005, 4:50 E4 2007, 8:07 C12 2005, 9:16 L2 2014
2018
9:18
You sunk my battleship.
ChubbyChecker182, and there's a bloke down there with no strides on.
I'm guessing you had nothing else to do.
If you’re standing on the right part of the moon you can see a man-made moon lander.
If you put a ladder on the South Pole would you go down int space.
quarterthrottle Only if you are a flat earther.
@@jimraq1 if the earth was flat wouldn't he have to put a ladder on the underside of the planet as putting a ladder on the south Pole in a flat Earth scenario would be exactly the same as any other point of the earth?
If you have your eyes open then you should be looking at the inside of your visor
@@quarteronline > depends how long it is
3:53 Clarkson knows obscure fruit fly fact, everyone moves on
I don't think he knew it, I think he inferred from the fact that they're called "Ken and Barbie". "Kell Doll" is a pretty common shorthand for lacking genitals.
I never thought I’d ever be jealous of Johnny Vegas, until Aisling Bea was sat next to him!
Stephen Fry has some of the strangest compliments.
"I'm sorry that it sounded quitE so patronizing"
I just went to google maps and found Wallace Idaho, found Banks & 6th - and there is a sign that says "Center of the Universe"! LOL
I love the wisdom of the rural buddha.
dalai farmer ?
10:35 THE BALLS TO SAY THAT 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 omg i love their irony
It's either ballsy, or, and that is a real possibility, that guy really believes it to be true.
Its both ironic and true, as he mentions with the whole "We were the same during our colonial period". The reason its in their DNA is because the colonizers were English and in English humour, self deprecation is normal.
the shock on richards face when he was right about the ken and barbie thing xD
That was Jeremy
‘What man Made Artifacts can be seen from the moon with naked eye’ well I would imagine the American flag on the moon could be seen?
No evidence its there apart from what we've been told, like most space facts. We do know structural things exist on Earth though.
More like the french flag now.
:P
It's white.
@@11Survivor LMAO
The patience Stephen sometimes must have haha.
The Dalai farmer. Brilliant!
4:03 Jeremy's face
He’s like, “... that was COMPLETELY a random guess, but... yeah, I’ll just not SAY anything further and appear smarter than I really am!” 🤣🤣🤣
The edge of space is defined by the Karman line.
The V2 could not get high enough to reach the Karman line and thus did not make it to space.
johnny vegas, god love 'im
This program is so much like a classroom it’s amazing
I think most kids in my school watched it. Every now and then there would always be a random QI fact brought up.
The Rural Buddha Bill Bailey has a point with travelling to space using your own imagination. Olaf Stapleton used a similar idea where in his book 'Star Maker' the main character 'The Traveler' went to the top of a hill and 'projected his thought' out into the universe.
The US government never developed a special pen for space. Some pen company (probably fisher-price) did it on their own to get in on the space craze. I think a regular pen was used by astronauts.
No they used the pressurized pens. the thing is back then ball point pens were very expensive and quite unreliable. It was until BIC used mass production that ball point pens became affordable. The pressurized pen was the only realistic option for the astronauts.
@@austinpowers2033
1950 Bic ball point pen.
1957 Sputnik 1.
1969 Apollo 11.
In 1960's ball point pens
not expensive.
Was glad to see the earth rotate the way it actually does in this video.
surprised stephen didnt go "well actually you CAN see many man made objects from space but you just cant really tell because they look so small"
The Apollo landing sites are full of things you can see that are man made.
He didn't say that because it's wrong. While light reflecting from these objects would reach your eye, it would be far too dim for your eye to register, and the eye can't discern such small distances from that far away.
That's true, but you still can't see them from the Moon, why?, because you aren't on the moon.
Of the few clips with Jeremy Clarkson I've seen, he's pretty much gotten all the answers, which is surprising to me.
"My genius... it's almost frightening."
This is one show you just KNOW the audience is actually having a good time
"The mayor of Idaho" lmao
English is my city
There is a town called Idaho City. So you could call him the mayor of Idaho, like how the mayor of NYC is often just called the mayor of New York.
There's that scene in the Hitch Hikers Guide where they put Zaphod in the machine that shows you your relationship to the universe. The last clip was wrong. Douglas Adams already answered this question.
Wasn't that only because Zaphod was in the artificial universe designed to hide him? He'd naturally be the most important person in it. As Gag Halfrunt said "Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?"
The total perspective vortex. I know. I heard the BBC radio show in 1978
@@zapkvr no way, Grunthos the Flatulent!
@@thenumbdave yes way. I have all the original recordings on CD
@@zapkvr Me too! I also have them on cassette recorded off the radio, and somewhere the vinyl version of the first series with Dawn French as Trillian, I was obsessed with it :)
Mars is a red brown though. "Brown" is a vague description that includes many very red hues. "Brown" and "orange" can only be distinguished by saturation and thus by comparison to a dark backdrop. If the sky is black, Mars is definitely red, or red-orange. Just look at it and tell me it's brown.
9:21
Keyword: *OBSERVABLE* ...
YOU are observing everything around YOU. YOU are the center.... of the OBSERVABLE universe. Not of THE universe...
0:25 is probably one of my favourite times in TV history.
I don't get that joke and it's bugging me!
@@fabriciotorres6634 basically Alan is triggering Stephen.
@@fabriciotorres6634 Alan is indicating that he made the "stupid" comment just to wind Stephen up, and everyone is laughing at how successful he was
It's rare when Johnny Vegas gets a dig in at Stephen!
A lot more than you realise.😂 He's very subtle.
More of these vids plzzzz:)
I genuinely think that is the funniest thing Sean Lock has ever said 🤣
My new mantra, "Wisdom and cheap cider".
What's at the centre of the observable universe?
The observer.
What man made artifacts can be seen from the moon? Well if someone where standing on the moon they could see: an American flag, mirrors, spacesuits, and the luna orbiter.
10:53 didn't know Johnny Vegas played Pokemon
The Dalai Farmer!
Mars is rust colored because the color comes from iron oxide in the rocks and regolith there. NASA tweaks colors to look "correct" but there's a bit of a blue & black vs white & gold dress problem. Illumination affects color so do you want to know what something looks like under ambient lighting on Mars or do you want to know what color something is (the visible spectrum albedo). They are actually two different things. The Viking images were tweaked after they noticed a cable was the wrong color in a photo, modern missions like Curiosity take color calibration photographic targets attached to the rover to help get it right after the Viking lesson. In practice many images are multispectral for scientific analysis and aren't even optimized for human vision, so the visual appearance is a secondary concern, strangely enough. Color is used to help identify minerals as part of the mission's geological analysis, it's not primarily about the beauty shots although they are amazing.
"it only appears red" But it only appears brown when on the surface too. lol
6:30 series of trampolines. I know its silly. But instead of 1 continues space elevator I have always wondered about the series of elevator ideas
I like Johnny Vegas's shirt.
Stephen Fry laughing at Jonny Vegas' comment! 🤣
In the 1600s, the poet and swordsman Cyrano de Bergerac wrote that he had travelled to the moon by taking a magnet and sitting on a sheet of metal. He threw the magnet into the air and ascended on the metal plate (which was attracted by the magnet). He then caught the magnet, threw it upward again, and so ascended indefinitely. (He was kidding.)
Center of the universe is like beauty. In the eye of the beholder.
It amazes me that people are told the photos from Mars are shopped to fall in line with our expectations and it just runs like water off a duck's back. Like i wouldn't have cared if they said "oh btw, it's not red. It's actually just a dusty brown colour", and i don't think many people would. So why even go to trouble? How does it benefit anything or anyone to lie about that?
But what's more important than that is the admission that they shop photos to match expectations. Expectations set by the same people. So what else has been shopped? Like i know basically every photo that comes from space is digitally enhanced. But i no longer feel like i can trust those images at all, nor the source of where they're coming from
Fountains of paradise. I’ll award myself a point for that one
5:34 somebody was clearly inspired by Phezzan...
i watch Qi every night when i go too bed. today i have the whole internet and guess what i am doing.
Its the dust from de pencil that IS danger, no " a broken peice". The dust of grafitte in eletronics make bad funcionalit...
something man-made can be seen from the moon with the naked eye. The orbiter you arrived in.
RIP JOHN SESSIONS
Funny, Ive always thought the universe revolves around me
Surely Items left behind from the moon landing can be seen from the moon?
If the moon whas flat like the earth than yes.😁
@@Ohmloud if you were standing right next to it, it wouldn't need the moon to be flat
Duhh..
Man made objects from the moon on the earth? So not made on earth, but actualy made on the moon? Stool/urine samples made by astronaute on the moon where collected in a bag and brougth back to earth fore research where labeld and stored and kept in a freezer . (If a nasa worker dint mastake it fore fudge took it out the freezer and eat it)
I swear Alan Davis is like all the Monty python blokes rolled into one.
Except Terry Gilliam.
4:03 that look XD
Maybe you could count holland as being able to be seen from space
Johnny Vegas tries so hard to be funny doesn’t he, it’s adorable.
It wasn't until now i realise that Johnny Vegas was the one that won the £10k jackpot back in a 2001 Weakest link special,.... Jeez
If the universe is infinite, and constantly expanding out in all directions, does that not mean the center of the universe is each individual person?
the universe is limitless not infinite🧐
The centre of the observable universe is the observer. THe centre of the entire universe, we don't know, the universe seems to be flat as far as we can see in our observable universe, but maybe it's a 4D donut shape, in which case there would be no centre,
the astronauts would actually be able to see the lunar lander that they arrived on.
The mayor of Idaho! 🤣🤣🤣
I like the "bubble to space" idea at 6:54. Unfortunately a bubble pops when there's more air inside it than there's surrounding air. And many other issues! But fun idea nonetheless.
It doesn't pop if you release some of the pressure. If the bubble holds 2 bars on sea level, it will hold 1 bar in vacuum.
What if, by some work of fate, Jonny Vegas was right about the sun being the centre of the universe. As it's not provable, it is possible. Though I suspect my genitals are the centre of the universe. 🤣
I'm confused about the centre of the universe bit. Could we not use redshift to locate the central point of expansion?
They were talking about the observable universe, not the whole universe itself. Even so, I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that the universe doesn't have a centre or an edge, so everything is redshifting away from us at the same rate.
@@thidang6247 I am certain I've heard that things are expanding away from us at different speeds, and that the delta in redshift can be used to find the originating direction.
@@adamnshame can you find an authority for that?
Wherever you are in the universe everything appears to expand away from yourself.
@@adamnshame They are expanding away from us at different speeds, but that's a matter of distance, not direction. Everything that's the same distance is receding at the same speed, regardless of which direction we look. And we can measure distances out to about 10 billion light years using Type 1a supernovae, which all have the same intrinsic brightness.
And that's the same for the bar as well.
Man made objects seen from the moon. Any of the stuff Apollo missions left behind.
QI must be the only platform that Clarkson can not dominate.
Who knew the Dalai Farmer joke was coming but laughed anyway?
"Mayor of Idaho" lol
Oh Sean Lock I miss you 😂
01:10 the craft you landed with.
The hair!
LMAO! I was born in Wallace, Idaho! Only about 1,000 people there.
I once said to wind up a scientist friend of mine that space doesn't exist and he looked at me like I was mental!
That's not the only reason he looked at you like you are mental.
@@zapkvr Lol cheeky swine lol...
What man made object can be seen from the moon? An American flag.
fotbalmfotbalm still have not image from a telescope or the lunar orbiter or the Japanese orbiter ffs :(
10:55, is that L in the background a Death Note reference?
No
Now the question stands: is that the L from Death Note on the screen or is it the one from Layton game series or are there maby even both?
Man made object that can be seen from the moon - street lights
Good Lord that first clip is from so long ago.. Yet bill Bailey looks exactly the same.
Tis the un-ageability of the royal buddha.
Alan Davies is my spirit animal
2:20 so it could sing Fly me to the Moon
I'd like to think the center of the universe, is the internet. It's after all the point from which all information flows from.