I have never heard perfect and clearer answers than this in any other interview before.... Absolute thought clarity and intuition (very powerful and balanced and active Ajna chakra) and very brilliant, clear and balanced expression of thoughts (both practical and logical) of each and every question (very powerful and balanced and active Vishuddhi chakra).... And even very self confident replies with conviction and without holding back (powerful and balanced and active Manipur chakra) and yet very careful and sensitive about others' feelings and faith (powerful, balanced and active Anahat chakra)... What a great personality!!!
Really ma'am U r great personality. Mere dono bacche jo 1st and 4th standard me hai aake sare videos dhyaan se sunte hai aur real mahabharat aur ramayan read karna chahate hai
ALL COCK AND BULL STORIES OF ANCIENT HINDUS GETTING PISSED OFF WITH BAAAAD HINDUSIM AND GETTING CONVERTE TO GOOOODIE GOOOOD BUDDHISM ARE ALL FAKE. EMPEROR ASOKA NEVER EXISTED JUST LIKE JESUS CHRIST. Till 325 AD, not a single historian or writer wrote about Jesus Christ or any of is disciples . Every literary fest in India conducted by white skinned Indophiles discuss the fake DASAS, the fake RADHA, the fake episode of Lord Ram kicking his pregnant wife Sita into the forest to deliver twins LUV / KUSH etc . They churn out foul lies every single month using the COMMIE JNU university-claiming that this portion of Ramayana was found in Vietnam and this portion of Mahabharata was found in Indonesia etc. the REAL AND ORIGINAL Buddha was born in 1900 BC-- and NOT born the time wikipedia states. THIS IS THE MAHARISHI WHOM THE ENTIRE FAR EAST WORSHIPS. The white christian invader has placed buddha at 563 BC. this buddha NO 2 ( A FOLLOWER ) is responsible for shunning vedas and sanskrit the white christian invader has called lord Mahavira as the founder of jainism. This is absolutely wrong. Emperor Rishabha ( Adinath ) , the father of Chakravatri Bharata is the founder of Jainism in 8190 BC, and is the first Thirthankara. The white historian has put Mahavira as a contemporary of Buddha at 599 BC. This is wrong . First of all Mahavira was just a reformer. He was the 24th Thirtankara . Mahavira was born in 4500 BC. emperor ashoka born in 304 BC never existed. WHY WAS THE GREAT LIBRARY OF ALEXANDRIA BURNT? TO SINK APOLLONIUS OF TYANA -- A KERALA SAGE WHO WAS BEING WORSHIPED AS GOD.. HE WAS A SPIRITUAL ANCHOR FOR ROMANS WHO WENT THROUGH TEN DESPOT ROMAN EMPERORS IN HIS LIFETIME THE COLOSSEUM OF ROME ( CONSTRUCTED ON TOP OF A DRIED UP LAKE ) WAS NOT MADE FOR BLOODSPORT. IT WAS MADE FOR HEARING THE SPEECHES OF APOLLONIUS OF TYANA ।।।।
❤❤❤ These Two Women are really cute great Indian women When a Country has this kind of thinkers ❤❤ That country is definitely unstoppable Most respected Love 💕 I hope 🤞
ताड़ना का अर्थ प्रताड़ना लगाते से अर्थ का अनर्थ हो जाता है।तुलसीदास जी ने स्त्री का बहुत सम्मान किया है।ताड़ना अर्थात देखभाल करना लेकिन प्र लग जाने से कई बार मतलब ही बदल जाता है जैसे खर-प्रखर ,सन्न-प्रसन्न।तो तुलसीदास जी के अनुसार ढोल,गंवार, शूद्र, पशु,नारी की हमे देखभाल करनी चाहिए।
There are too many verses in Valmiki Ramayana pointing out that Sri Rama ate meat in exile. These are: Ramayana 2:20:29 Ramayana. 2:52:89 Ramayana 2:56:22 Ramayana 2:56:35 Ramayana 2:84:10 Ramayana 3:47:22 Ramayana 3:68:32 Ramayana 3:68:33 However, people seem shocked that Sri Rama ate meat? Having spent my time with quite a few Kshatriya families, I am astonished that people feel that Sri Rama did not eat meat. Sri Rama’s divinity does not get reduced since he ate meat. An Avatara is a descent into human consciousness.. and he is an Avatara. Divine is divine... it is what it is.. But if someone feels that his divinity is reduced by eating meat: let him be a vegetarian in your eyes. The issue of Sri Rama eating meat or not simply does NOT move me. It’s not somethingI fight for or against. To clarify, it’s a non issue for me. I get why some people want him to be vegetarian... but to me it makes zero difference.
Remember Sri Ram was in the forest and the body cannot survive properly without meat once in a while. But it is not a point that should be dwelt upon unnecessarily nor glossed over stealthily.
शंबुक वध, सिता त्याग पर आक्षेप ये राम से श्रद्धा का भंजन का षडयंत्र है एक सामान्य नियम है गणित, भुमिती, रसायन शास्त्र, फिजिक्स जो विषय है उसीके रूल्स फॉलो करने चाहिये श्रीराम त्रेतायुग के घटनांओंका का सही - गलत अर्थ कलियुग में ठहराना मूर्खतापूर्ण है अमेरिका और भारत में गाडी चलाने के नियम अलग अलग होते है
This discussion is not based on critical history, it is theology, philosophy that is discussed ,we should always differentiate between both approach. Mixing both shows lack of understanding of scripture on our part
Amiji - May I know is there any original script found written by Valmiki. ? What I understood is that entire Ramayana was orally recited and transmitted from generation to generation, what is the authenticity of manuscript which was found to be was indeed from Valmiki? where there was no written system ? how authentic when it is transmitted orally from disciple to disciple. It is obvious while writings the RAMAYANA the author wouldn't have got What Valmiki composed ? so what we have is distorted version am i right in my conclusion? When there is no writing system during the age of Ramayana then how come Epic narrates such a rich advanced civilization with technology of flying vehicles, advanced weapon systems and highly ethic and moral society which is not adding up what is your analysis? Humans are the highest intelligent species on earth how come during Ramayana new species appeared ( Hanuman and vanaras) How come it suddenly appeared from no where and disappeared in less than 100 years during Ramayana? is there any archeological evidence of Valmiki and his dissent? How did Rama and his brothers travelled thousands of miles from north India to Southern part of India? where there is no GPS system? no navigational system? how come Rama and his brothers found that Sita was taken to Srilanka? How come Surpanka Ravan's Sister got the specific information about location of Rama and his family in such dense forest ?
Keval raja ke naate Ramji ne aise nahi kiya... Unhone Lakshman ji se specifically kahan ke Sita ji ko Valmiki Ashram ke paas jo nadi hai uske paas chhor kar aane ke liye... Kyunki Aranya kand mei teeno Valmiki ashram jaate hai aur Ramji aur Sita ji ye decide karte hai ke apne santano ko Valmiki ji ke paas shiksha lene ke liye bhejenge... Ramji Sitaji aur apne hone wale santan ko Ayodhya mei chal rahi lanchan, apvad se dur rakhna chahte the.
Mam , 26:07 par aapne bola ki Shri Ram ne diplomacy use ki or Vibhishan se haal chaal nhi poocha seedhe Lanka k baare me baat ki to Mam mujhe lgta h yahah aap mistaken ho .Shri Ram ne Vibhishan ji ka haal bhi poocha or Vibhishan ji ki putri or Patni ke baare me bhi poocha ki vo kaisi hai Lanka me
Biggest diffrence between ram and krushna was RAM was raja while krishna was prince thus raj dharam was headech of balram not krushnas 🤣🤣 but Ram was bound by raj dharam . Thus krushna was focused only on establishing dharam through Sam daam dand bhed (, by any means ) . RAM as they say was in treta yug preparing the society for dwapar yug while krushna came at end of dwapar yug to preapare humanity for kaal yug . And situations in both the yug for human soceity wear and are compleatly diffrent so core dharam teachings of ram and krushna are same but krushna is the only one amongest all the prophet's or bhgwans gurus or what ever you call them who declared unbashingky that I am the one . I am brahmann. Ram never said he is brshmann or Narayan. But krushna in gita says he the one the ultimate being and I love him for his this audacity .🤣 did he earn this bragging rights ?, well who ever understand even 1 percent of master class of gita will say yes absolutely he earned the bragging rights and how .🙂
Sahi kaha... Ram had the formal authority and power whereas Krishna had informal authority or influencial or charismatic power... Ram was eldest brother, leader of Vaanar army and the king eventually but Maryada Purushottam here would mean he didn't misuse any formal authority or power or the Shakti that he had... However, having said that, my some of the most favourite incidents still in both Ramayan and Mahabharat are Ram's anger on Samudra and Krishna rushing towards Bhishma❤...
Decisions of ram no where encourage you to think that good decsion will give you good life . His life was probably one of the biggest tragedies some because of circumstances and some because of his own descion. His child hood was spent in jungle I'm gutukul ashram for studies not in a palace . Once back after getting married he made a big wrong decsion against raj dharam. Pati dharam and even Putra dharam ( against hid biological mother ,) to keep his fathers promise vachan that too unkown given to husband step mom and results of such bad descion wear born by his entire family and entire kingdom. Krushnas would have never agreed to such nonsebsical demands of his step mom. Then throwing his pregnancy wife out and again suffering bachelor's life without is family too was a stupid decsion . Even agreeing to fact that for 14 years in jungle he will not have baby then not calling for his army to fight raven and depending on monkey army all thesse drscion wear not of a smart person nor they wear in accordance of raj dharam Pati dharam yudh dharam Putra dharam thus character of krushna is class in mahabharat . He did not care what people would say when he kidnapped a girl to marry . For dharam he encouraged pandvas to do war and win at any cost . He was ready to break his vachan to finish bhishma because he was greatest obstacle to win dharam yudh .( hear there was no nonsense of pran Jaay paar vachan na jaaye🤣) so krushna is clear and in a diffrent league . Supreamly intaligent and practical to win dharam yudh .
इतिहास नही कथा है |रामायण तो 300 लिखे गये है भारत वर्षमे | 1600 सालकी आयु है जात व्यवस्था कि और रामायण लिखी है जा्तव्यवस्था पर. क्योंकी 1600 साल पहेले हमारे यहाँ जात थी ही नही |सम्राट अशोक राजा the लेकिन क्षत्रिय वगैरा कुछ नही थे |
Valmiki, the Adi Kavi wrote Ramayana around 5600-5550 BCE. Valmiki Ramayana had inspired many scholars to write Drishya (Natya) and Shrāvya Kāvyas in Laukika Sanskrit. Public performances of Ramayana and Puranas became the main source of the entertainment of society. The demand for innovations in performances led to the evolution of various Ramayanas like Adbhuta Ramayana, Ananda Ramayana etc. During the post-Ramayana era, the performanceof Adbhuta rasa became immensely popular which led to mythologisation of historical legends of Ramayana and Puranas like Shukacharya was depicted as parrot-faced, Gajānana as elephantfaced, Narasimha as lion-faced, Vamana as midget, Kapi as monkey, Rishi or King Mastya as fish, Varaha as boar, Riksha as bear, Naga as serpent, Garuda as eagle etc. Interestingly, the public performances of Sanskrit kavyas and natakas brought a paradigm shift in the spoken languages of Indian society.
जब हिन्दू ही अपने इतिहास पर प्रश्नचिन्ह लगाएंगे तो विधर्मी तो ताक लगाए बैठे हैं हमको , हमारे बच्चों को misguide करने के लिये . जबकि हमारे विद्वान prove करते रहते हैं .
अमी जैसी पुत्री,भाग्य से मिलती है
You are great & honest. There is no doubt that Ramayana is part of our living faith
jai shree Ganesh...Hare krishna..... 🙏🙏🙏হরে কৃষ্ণ 🙏🙏🙏 jai shree ram.... 🙏🙏🙏 jai sita ram.....🙏🙏🙏 jai bajrangbali.....🙏🙏🙏
A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots.
Marcus Garvey।।।।।।
I have never heard perfect and clearer answers than this in any other interview before.... Absolute thought clarity and intuition (very powerful and balanced and active Ajna chakra) and very brilliant, clear and balanced expression of thoughts (both practical and logical) of each and every question (very powerful and balanced and active Vishuddhi chakra).... And even very self confident replies with conviction and without holding back (powerful and balanced and active Manipur chakra) and yet very careful and sensitive about others' feelings and faith (powerful, balanced and active Anahat chakra)... What a great personality!!!
आप अद्भुत गुरू हो 🙏
Really ma'am U r great personality. Mere dono bacche jo 1st and 4th standard me hai aake sare videos dhyaan se sunte hai aur real mahabharat aur ramayan read karna chahate hai
आपको साधुवाद ।वाल्मीकि जी की रामायण के विषय में बताने के लिए ।सत सत नमन ।अमी जी।
Behan
You are a good orator
And
Sharp witted.
Sadar Pranaam
Have a balance in life.
- bhagvan buddha
Jay shree ram
Har har mahadev
It's a privilege and act of Providence , that we are able of hear you Thank you for your dedication and sharing your knowledge
ALL COCK AND BULL STORIES OF ANCIENT HINDUS GETTING PISSED OFF WITH BAAAAD HINDUSIM AND GETTING CONVERTE TO GOOOODIE GOOOOD BUDDHISM ARE ALL FAKE.
EMPEROR ASOKA NEVER EXISTED JUST LIKE JESUS CHRIST.
Till 325 AD, not a single historian or writer wrote about Jesus Christ or any of is disciples .
Every literary fest in India conducted by white skinned Indophiles discuss the fake DASAS, the fake RADHA, the fake episode of Lord Ram kicking his pregnant wife Sita into the forest to deliver twins LUV / KUSH etc .
They churn out foul lies every single month using the COMMIE JNU university-claiming that this portion of Ramayana was found in Vietnam and this portion of Mahabharata was found in Indonesia etc.
the REAL AND ORIGINAL Buddha was born in 1900 BC-- and NOT born the time wikipedia states. THIS IS THE MAHARISHI WHOM THE ENTIRE FAR EAST WORSHIPS.
The white christian invader has placed buddha at 563 BC. this buddha NO 2 ( A FOLLOWER ) is responsible for shunning vedas and sanskrit
the white christian invader has called lord Mahavira as the founder of jainism. This is absolutely wrong.
Emperor Rishabha ( Adinath ) , the father of Chakravatri Bharata is the founder of Jainism in 8190 BC, and is the first Thirthankara.
The white historian has put Mahavira as a contemporary of Buddha at 599 BC. This is wrong . First of all Mahavira was just a reformer. He was the 24th Thirtankara . Mahavira was born in 4500 BC.
emperor ashoka born in 304 BC never existed.
WHY WAS THE GREAT LIBRARY OF ALEXANDRIA BURNT?
TO SINK APOLLONIUS OF TYANA -- A KERALA SAGE WHO WAS BEING WORSHIPED AS GOD.. HE WAS A SPIRITUAL ANCHOR FOR ROMANS WHO WENT THROUGH TEN DESPOT ROMAN EMPERORS IN HIS LIFETIME
THE COLOSSEUM OF ROME ( CONSTRUCTED ON TOP OF A DRIED UP LAKE ) WAS NOT MADE FOR BLOODSPORT. IT WAS MADE FOR HEARING THE SPEECHES OF APOLLONIUS OF TYANA
।।।।
❤❤❤ These Two Women are really cute great Indian women
When a Country has this kind of thinkers ❤❤ That country is definitely unstoppable
Most respected
Love 💕 I hope 🤞
रामायण ग्रंथ पर बोधगम्य एवं उत्कृष्ट विवेचन। अमी जी, आपको बहुत बहुत साधुवाद 🙏
जय सियाराम 🙏
ताड़ना का अर्थ प्रताड़ना लगाते से अर्थ का अनर्थ हो जाता है।तुलसीदास जी ने स्त्री का बहुत सम्मान किया है।ताड़ना अर्थात देखभाल करना लेकिन प्र लग जाने से कई बार मतलब ही बदल जाता है जैसे खर-प्रखर ,सन्न-प्रसन्न।तो तुलसीदास जी के अनुसार ढोल,गंवार, शूद्र, पशु,नारी की हमे देखभाल करनी चाहिए।
Namaste Ami Ji. You truly have been blessed by Shri Narayan. 🙏🙏🙏
जय श्री राम
Lanka was set on fire
But Samridhi of Ravana had excellent disaster management.
Lord Vishvakarma had helped in recovering the arsoned city.
जय श्री राम जय श्री कृष्ण
Brilliant ma'am 👏👏👏,Eye opening points.
Thanks for bringing light on such controversy. 🙏🙏🙏
Jai Siya Raam Lakhan aap ke Kripa Ami ji for us all
Really ami mam , u got so much patience and love towards our great epics, u answered so many points for just one simple question, great 👍
अति सुंदर वाख्यान्। धन्यवाद पंदिताः
महेश श्रीमली जी की इस बात से मैं पूर्णतः सहमत हूं। 🙏
Apke consept to Ramayan se alag hai , Kamal hai apko bhi log follow krte hai , . Jay Sanatan 🙏🏻
There are too many verses in Valmiki Ramayana pointing out that Sri Rama ate meat in exile.
These are:
Ramayana 2:20:29
Ramayana. 2:52:89
Ramayana 2:56:22
Ramayana 2:56:35
Ramayana 2:84:10
Ramayana 3:47:22
Ramayana 3:68:32
Ramayana 3:68:33
However, people seem shocked that Sri Rama ate meat?
Having spent my time with quite a few Kshatriya families, I am astonished that people feel that Sri Rama did not eat meat.
Sri Rama’s divinity does not get reduced since he ate meat. An Avatara is a descent into human consciousness.. and he is an Avatara.
Divine is divine... it is what it is..
But if someone feels that his divinity is reduced by eating meat: let him be a vegetarian in your eyes.
The issue of Sri Rama eating meat or not simply does NOT move me. It’s not somethingI fight for or against. To clarify, it’s a non issue for me.
I get why some people want him to be vegetarian... but to me it makes zero difference.
So ,Should we start eating meat ?
@@kapilyadav6523 what's the problem with that, consume it with healthy balanced diet condition
Remember Sri Ram was in the forest and the body cannot survive properly without meat once in a while.
But it is not a point that should be dwelt upon unnecessarily nor glossed over stealthily.
GOOD ITIHAS
very well & practically explained by Ami
जय श्री राम जय जय श्री राम जय हनुमान
Ami ji. Great work . I watch all ur videos. Pls continue this work. M here. Supporting. Sanatanis supporting .
Ami Ganatra. 👍🙏
His book is eye opening knowledge.. read them or you will miss some values.. In this era
लोकतंत्र भारत को कभी भी मजबूत नही कर सकता है और भारत को बचाने के लिए तुरंत प्रभाव से सैन्य शासन की आवश्यकता है अन्यथा ईरान लेबनान बनने तैयार रहें
Awesome Inc
Uttam vibran
Bhut gan wardhak
हिंदी में भी लिखी ।बड़ी कृपा होगी ।
शंबुक वध, सिता त्याग पर आक्षेप ये राम से श्रद्धा का भंजन का षडयंत्र है
एक सामान्य नियम है गणित, भुमिती, रसायन शास्त्र, फिजिक्स जो विषय है उसीके रूल्स फॉलो करने चाहिये
श्रीराम त्रेतायुग के घटनांओंका का सही - गलत अर्थ कलियुग में ठहराना मूर्खतापूर्ण है
अमेरिका और भारत में गाडी चलाने के नियम अलग अलग होते है
May be tulsidas wrote because at that time mughals were invading and torturing woman. And he meant that women also deserve to live
This discussion is not based on critical history, it is theology, philosophy that is discussed ,we should always differentiate between both approach. Mixing both shows lack of understanding of scripture on our part
Nice
Kyon nhi fal pdta ..... अगर राम भगवान खुद आके बोले की मैने मांस खाया है तो भी मै नहिं मानूंगा । that's it
Amiji - May I know is there any original script found written by Valmiki. ? What I understood is that entire Ramayana was orally recited and transmitted from generation to generation,
what is the authenticity of manuscript which was found to be was indeed from Valmiki?
where there was no written system ? how authentic when it is transmitted orally from disciple to disciple. It is obvious while writings the RAMAYANA the author wouldn't have got What Valmiki composed ? so what we have is distorted version am i right in my conclusion?
When there is no writing system during the age of Ramayana then how come Epic narrates such a rich advanced civilization with technology of flying vehicles, advanced weapon systems and highly ethic and moral society which is not adding up what is your analysis?
Humans are the highest intelligent species on earth how come during Ramayana new species appeared ( Hanuman and vanaras) How come it suddenly appeared from no where and disappeared in less than 100 years during Ramayana?
is there any archeological evidence of Valmiki and his dissent?
How did Rama and his brothers travelled thousands of miles from north India to Southern part of India?
where there is no GPS system? no navigational system? how come Rama and his brothers found that Sita was taken to Srilanka?
How come Surpanka Ravan's Sister got the specific information about location of Rama and his family in such dense forest ?
Keval raja ke naate Ramji ne aise nahi kiya... Unhone Lakshman ji se specifically kahan ke Sita ji ko Valmiki Ashram ke paas jo nadi hai uske paas chhor kar aane ke liye... Kyunki Aranya kand mei teeno Valmiki ashram jaate hai aur Ramji aur Sita ji ye decide karte hai ke apne santano ko Valmiki ji ke paas shiksha lene ke liye bhejenge... Ramji Sitaji aur apne hone wale santan ko Ayodhya mei chal rahi lanchan, apvad se dur rakhna chahte the.
age of Ram and sita a per valmiki ramayan is 21 and 18... kindly check it
मैं यह पुस्तक अवश्य पढूंगा परन्तु इस पुस्तक (Ramayana Unravelled) का अभी तक हिंदी संस्करण नहीं आया है। 🙁🙁
Mam , 26:07 par aapne bola ki Shri Ram ne diplomacy use ki or Vibhishan se haal chaal nhi poocha seedhe Lanka k baare me baat ki to
Mam mujhe lgta h yahah aap mistaken ho .Shri Ram ne Vibhishan ji ka haal bhi poocha or Vibhishan ji ki putri or Patni ke baare me bhi poocha ki vo kaisi hai Lanka me
By that time loha or iron ore was not cast
The views are opinionated just like anybody else. It doesn’t add any weight to the argument
Biggest diffrence between ram and krushna was RAM was raja while krishna was prince thus raj dharam was headech of balram not krushnas 🤣🤣 but Ram was bound by raj dharam . Thus krushna was focused only on establishing dharam through Sam daam dand bhed (, by any means ) . RAM as they say was in treta yug preparing the society for dwapar yug while krushna came at end of dwapar yug to preapare humanity for kaal yug . And situations in both the yug for human soceity wear and are compleatly diffrent so core dharam teachings of ram and krushna are same but krushna is the only one amongest all the prophet's or bhgwans gurus or what ever you call them who declared unbashingky that I am the one . I am brahmann. Ram never said he is brshmann or Narayan. But krushna in gita says he the one the ultimate being and I love him for his this audacity .🤣 did he earn this bragging rights ?, well who ever understand even 1 percent of master class of gita will say yes absolutely he earned the bragging rights and how .🙂
Sahi kaha... Ram had the formal authority and power whereas Krishna had informal authority or influencial or charismatic power... Ram was eldest brother, leader of Vaanar army and the king eventually but Maryada Purushottam here would mean he didn't misuse any formal authority or power or the Shakti that he had... However, having said that, my some of the most favourite incidents still in both Ramayan and Mahabharat are Ram's anger on Samudra and Krishna rushing towards Bhishma❤...
इसे लोगो की वजह से हमारा इतिहास खराब हुआ है।
Decisions of ram no where encourage you to think that good decsion will give you good life . His life was probably one of the biggest tragedies some because of circumstances and some because of his own descion. His child hood was spent in jungle I'm gutukul ashram for studies not in a palace . Once back after getting married he made a big wrong decsion against raj dharam. Pati dharam and even Putra dharam ( against hid biological mother ,) to keep his fathers promise vachan that too unkown given to husband step mom and results of such bad descion wear born by his entire family and entire kingdom. Krushnas would have never agreed to such nonsebsical demands of his step mom.
Then throwing his pregnancy wife out and again suffering bachelor's life without is family too was a stupid decsion . Even agreeing to fact that for 14 years in jungle he will not have baby then not calling for his army to fight raven and depending on monkey army all thesse drscion wear not of a smart person nor they wear in accordance of raj dharam Pati dharam yudh dharam Putra dharam thus character of krushna is class in mahabharat . He did not care what people would say when he kidnapped a girl to marry . For dharam he encouraged pandvas to do war and win at any cost . He was ready to break his vachan to finish bhishma because he was greatest obstacle to win dharam yudh .( hear there was no nonsense of pran Jaay paar vachan na jaaye🤣) so krushna is clear and in a diffrent league . Supreamly intaligent and practical to win dharam yudh .
Qur'an Kafiro ka. Get a copy and keep it in place.Badla Badla.
This is a lie that Lord Rama used to consume meat. ये झूठ फैलाया जाता है की श्री राम मांस का सेवन करते थे।
इतिहास नही कथा है |रामायण तो 300 लिखे गये है भारत वर्षमे |
1600 सालकी आयु है जात व्यवस्था कि और रामायण लिखी है जा्तव्यवस्था पर.
क्योंकी 1600 साल पहेले हमारे यहाँ जात थी ही नही |सम्राट अशोक राजा the लेकिन क्षत्रिय वगैरा कुछ नही थे |
Valmiki, the Adi Kavi wrote Ramayana around 5600-5550 BCE. Valmiki Ramayana had inspired
many scholars to write Drishya (Natya) and Shrāvya Kāvyas in Laukika Sanskrit. Public
performances of Ramayana and Puranas became the main source of the entertainment of society. The demand for innovations in performances led to the evolution of various Ramayanas like Adbhuta Ramayana, Ananda Ramayana etc. During the post-Ramayana era, the performanceof Adbhuta rasa became immensely popular which led to mythologisation of historical legends of Ramayana and Puranas like Shukacharya was depicted as parrot-faced, Gajānana as elephantfaced, Narasimha as lion-faced, Vamana as midget, Kapi as monkey, Rishi or King Mastya as fish, Varaha as boar, Riksha as bear, Naga as serpent, Garuda as eagle etc. Interestingly, the public performances of Sanskrit kavyas and natakas brought a paradigm shift in the spoken languages of Indian society.
जब हिन्दू ही अपने इतिहास पर प्रश्नचिन्ह लगाएंगे तो विधर्मी तो ताक लगाए बैठे हैं हमको , हमारे बच्चों को misguide करने के लिये . जबकि हमारे विद्वान prove करते रहते हैं .
Clearly, उल्टे घड़े में पनी नहीं भर्ता if this is a comment after seeing the full video.