I had this test done yesterday (8/30/2021). This is very good. But what is missing is any rendition of what the patient sees when looking through the lens!!
The funny this is, that the person that came up with this said it is crude and shouldn't be used for testing for peoples ability to drive. Was only design to get a rough idea of the medical conditions.
Each time you click. Be warned, if you have used a good quality Mouse or a clicker, & use to a proper and a quick tone feedback. This machine will drive you nuts. Modern gadgets have spoilt us. The feedback from the clicker is like using the most pathetic keyboard, ever. Which i am still to encounter.
Worst test...false positives and negatives and if you get distracted easily, the results are worse. The new and improved version is virtual and you follow the lights naturally with each eye, not fix your eye on a spot and don't move it. Much better results.
I had this test done yesterday (8/30/2021). This is very good. But what is missing is any rendition of what the patient sees when looking through the lens!!
Why does the doctor only use 24-2?
The funny this is, that the person that came up with this said it is crude and shouldn't be used for testing for peoples ability to drive. Was only design to get a rough idea of the medical conditions.
What is I can’t see the patients eye on the screen?
Price?
Does the sound correspond to every click or it’s an indication of the appearance of the blinking light
Each time you click.
Be warned, if you have used a good quality Mouse or a clicker, & use to a proper and a quick tone feedback. This machine will drive you nuts.
Modern gadgets have spoilt us.
The feedback from the clicker is like using the most pathetic keyboard, ever. Which i am still to encounter.
Worst test...false positives and negatives and if you get distracted easily, the results are worse. The new and improved version is virtual and you follow the lights naturally with each eye, not fix your eye on a spot and don't move it. Much better results.