I believe whenever they COULD have an audience they did. Of course there’s always some scenes where it’s impossible to depending on what editing would be needed, but there’s a few episodes where I could tell DHP was waiting for laughter to die down before launching into his next line and remember thinking that it had to have been a studio audience. No way a laugh track could have been timed that perfectly without one.
Frasier is on the level of Seinfeld. Friends is on the level off the big bang theory. But honestly the actors are just being modest or coy when they say the reason it was so good (or popular) is down to the writing... The cast is great and it may not even have been picked up had it not been for their comedic abilities. Courtney Cox and Matthew Perry particularly were quick witted and schooled/natural in improv. The writing in frasier is just ..great. Consistently Witty and dry (not just a few token bitter people/the Chandler well) and also is was usually webbed together in a similar fashion to what Larry David does with his story arcs stuff. And it was VERY rarely overly sentimental like a lot of those soppy ass Friends scripts; whenever there was a poignant moment in Frasier, it was real and genuinely heartwarming at times because any good writer would know better than to ruin a story by fraudulently overusing something such as empathy (or 3-6 women crying because their lives are going so well. How many times did Marty Crane tell his sons "i love you" in all those years? I think it was approximately ONCE, and boy was it beautifully sincere
"Sold! I like all those lines!"
"You all understood it, right?" lol
was he not referring to the editing process after.
DHP is Niles
When should we expect part 2?
14 years ago. (It was taken down back in 2015)
@@anneza2525 Man, that sucks.
So wait, I thought that Frasier wasn't filmed in front of an audience. Did they do it in the early seasons though?
It was always filmed in front of an audience. The scripts were treated like plays
I believe whenever they COULD have an audience they did. Of course there’s always some scenes where it’s impossible to depending on what editing would be needed, but there’s a few episodes where I could tell DHP was waiting for laughter to die down before launching into his next line and remember thinking that it had to have been a studio audience. No way a laugh track could have been timed that perfectly without one.
Frasier is on the level of Seinfeld. Friends is on the level off the big bang theory. But honestly the actors are just being modest or coy when they say the reason it was so good (or popular) is down to the writing... The cast is great and it may not even have been picked up had it not been for their comedic abilities. Courtney Cox and Matthew Perry particularly were quick witted and schooled/natural in improv.
The writing in frasier is just ..great. Consistently Witty and dry (not just a few token bitter people/the Chandler well) and also is was usually webbed together in a similar fashion to what Larry David does with his story arcs stuff. And it was VERY rarely overly sentimental like a lot of those soppy ass Friends scripts; whenever there was a poignant moment in Frasier, it was real and genuinely heartwarming at times because any good writer would know better than to ruin a story by fraudulently overusing something such as empathy (or 3-6 women crying because their lives are going so well.
How many times did Marty Crane tell his sons "i love you" in all those years? I think it was approximately ONCE, and boy was it beautifully sincere
I hate when there is a narrator! We could see and hear, so you don't need to tell us what's going on. That's why there are only 6 likes!!!!
Throws it out a little. But it does help
is it a commentary or is it only some random person doing a voiceover?
@@jenpeterson3712 yeah, i found it useful, especially for the last one, actually i still needed a comment to help understand the last line
@Rock Firedog interesting
Stop whining