One small detail, though... Lyapunov was not one of "The Five." That was Balakirev, Mussorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Cui, and Borodin. However, Lyapunov did study under Balakirev.
Lyapunov's etudes are a very interesting example of pianistic literature. Unfortunately, they are rarely performed, also due to their great technical complexity. Therefore, it is very great that in recent years a number of pianists have included these worthy works in their repertoire. These etudes are dedicated to Franz Liszt, and they seem to be a continuation of Liszt's transcendental etudes, but stylistically they certainly go back to Balakirev's Islamey, whose texture and technique are largely different from Liszt's piano style. It is no coincidence that many pianists who easily played Liszt’s works could not even play the first page of Islamey.
Une bonne idée pour un concert : 1ère partie les 12 transcendantes de Liszt, 2ème partie les 12 transcendantes de Lyapunov ! 😆🎹👍 Et en bis Islamey de Balakirev bien sûr ! 😜
I love reading the comments of people who think a composer/pianist is too much or not enough of this and that. Or how it reminds them too much of another composer. You have no credibility seriously, just don't comment until you post what you wrote or your interpretation. I've never seen a public as critical (armchair) as the classical crowd.
Superb playing, but on the whole I still prefer the Liszt. Some of the Lyapunov lack originality, especially the Lesghinka and the Elegie, which are highly reminiscent of Balakirev and Liszt. Most of the Lyapunov endings are a mite tedious and long-winded, effectively smearing up the conclusions. They just sound like they don't want to end where they should. My favourite among this set are Harpes éoliennes, Rondes des Fantômes, Tempête and Rondes des Sylphes.
@@_cytosine as far as I know, in italian, spanish (mal tiempo) and portuguese (mal tempo), Maltempo means something like. "bad time", "bad moment" or even "bad weather".
Amazing performance of these rarely played masterpieces!
I didn't know how difficult these etudes are until I started learning some of them.
One small detail, though... Lyapunov was not one of "The Five." That was Balakirev, Mussorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Cui, and Borodin. However, Lyapunov did study under Balakirev.
says who
@@Bozzigmupp according to most academic and history studies
Liner notes...
I will always view this gorgeous set as the children which Liszt never birthed into his own Études d'execution transcendante.
Bravissimo... davvero molto bravo. ❤
Beauty........ Poetry ..........
12 masterpieces, for sure !!!...
55:11: ❤❤❤
Lyapunov's etudes are a very interesting example of pianistic literature. Unfortunately, they are rarely performed, also due to their great technical complexity. Therefore, it is very great that in recent years a number of pianists have included these worthy works in their repertoire.
These etudes are dedicated to Franz Liszt, and they seem to be a continuation of Liszt's transcendental etudes, but stylistically they certainly go back to Balakirev's Islamey, whose texture and technique are largely different from Liszt's piano style. It is no coincidence that many pianists who easily played Liszt’s works could not even play the first page of Islamey.
Con este disco hoy le gane...en nivel 10 a mi pc...gracias❤❤❤🤟🤟🤟💥
Great gushing arias!
I found that he is not playing maltempo, he is playing welltempo. He is very well. Thank you. Krikor from L. A. CA.
correct
Bentempo 🙂
Un gran descubrimiento
I like. Very nice
Une bonne idée pour un concert : 1ère partie les 12 transcendantes de Liszt, 2ème partie les 12 transcendantes de Lyapunov ! 😆🎹👍
Et en bis Islamey de Balakirev bien sûr ! 😜
Semplicemente eccezionale.Grande prestazione di Vincenzo.
Suono e registrazione eccellenti.
Gran bel post, complimenti.
Etudes 2,6,7 are masterpieces, could easily be mistaken for Scriabin
In Nuit d'ete, there is an allusion to a very famous movie tune. I like to imagine that this etude inspired Leigh Harline to write it.
Revolutionary etude the Czarist version
I love reading the comments of people who think a composer/pianist is too much or not enough of this and that. Or how it reminds them too much of another composer. You have no credibility seriously, just don't comment until you post what you wrote or your interpretation. I've never seen a public as critical (armchair) as the classical crowd.
Low volume. 😢
Superb playing, but on the whole I still prefer the Liszt.
Some of the Lyapunov lack originality, especially the Lesghinka and the Elegie, which are highly reminiscent of Balakirev and Liszt.
Most of the Lyapunov endings are a mite tedious and long-winded, effectively smearing up the conclusions. They just sound like they don't want to end where they should.
My favourite among this set are Harpes éoliennes, Rondes des Fantômes, Tempête and Rondes des Sylphes.
Yeah, especially Terek 17:30. I don't understand those last three chords.
@@Angelo-z2i It's a subtle reference to the second subject (14:34). I think it makes quite a good ending, personally.
What a very unfortunate name for a musician.....
Because people mistake him with Aleksandr Lyapunov?
@@_cytosine as far as I know, in italian, spanish (mal tiempo) and portuguese (mal tempo), Maltempo means something like. "bad time", "bad moment" or even "bad weather".
maltempo as in "bad tempo" ;D
@@johannaalt9791 - 'bad weather' google says
@@user-xw9mk3ih7j Tempo in italian means, time, tempo and weather