Building and Flying a MASSIVE 3D Printed Spitfire (Ft. Drone Collision)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 янв 2025

Комментарии • 10

  • @stevec7596
    @stevec7596 11 часов назад +1

    Nice build. Seems crazy to not have any reinforcement though. If you prop it for more speed the wing would probably fold.

    • @J.T.Engineering
      @J.T.Engineering  10 часов назад

      @@stevec7596 I 100% agree. I couldn't believe it didn't have a carbon spar when I was printing it. I was pretty certain the wing wouldn't be strong enough but it held up even through some high G maneuvers.

  • @growbro365
    @growbro365 2 часа назад

    build an eclipson model 3d next

  • @kspplayerheffele
    @kspplayerheffele 2 часа назад

    where is the 5bladed propeller unique to the griffon spitfires

  • @iammeobviously6815
    @iammeobviously6815 4 часа назад

    also, instead of using ca glue, why not use epoxy to hold the wings together?

  • @recoveryguru
    @recoveryguru 10 часов назад

    I end up using epoxy often for 3D prints, because CA glue rarely seems bond well enough for me. Which is odd because CA glue is often recommended. I think I figured out the problem. I'm in the In Utah desert and where the humidity stays about 20% I found out CA glue reacts with humidity in the air. I wonder if CA glue just sucks in dry places.

    • @J.T.Engineering
      @J.T.Engineering  9 часов назад +1

      I also live in Utah, and haven't had any issues even during the hottest and driest months of the summer. I use ZapAGap Medium CA and occasionally the Gel Loctite CA for all my builds, and I have yet to have a plane fall apart from glue failure. They usually fall apart from operator error! I also use WAY more than I probably should.

  • @iammeobviously6815
    @iammeobviously6815 4 часа назад

    The model spitfire is MASSIVE. It does not fly very LOW, its performance does not TAPER, and it will never FADE from history!

  • @midw9193
    @midw9193 Час назад

    Me bf-109