100% Tariffs on China's EVs: Is this Canada's "Just Transition"?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 123

  • @frankm6218
    @frankm6218 Месяц назад +70

    Glad to see “Canadian foreign policy institute” held discussion here, however does Canada even have a foreign policy? Doesn’t Trudeau just receive phone calls from the US and say “yes sir!” to make it “policy”?

    • @HiggsBoson2149
      @HiggsBoson2149 Месяц назад +9

      Amerikkka say Jump, and Prime minister Man Child asks "How high?".

    • @bpeng2000
      @bpeng2000 Месяц назад +5

      Yes, this is super funny. The US imposes the 100% tariffs because it needs to protect the big three, but Canada does not have its own automobile industries, so this action essentially protects Ford, GM, even Toyota at the cost of Canadians.

    • @edwinhuang803
      @edwinhuang803 18 дней назад

      A 50% or 110% tarrif would at least show that the Canadian government tried to stave off the accusition of Canada being America's bitch. But they are not even trying to pretend.

  • @miker3298
    @miker3298 Месяц назад +36

    How stupid to impose high taxes on Canadian consumers just to please US

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 Месяц назад

      Canada doesn't have a foreign policy.
      USA's foreign policy is Canadian's foreign policy.
      New York Post
      " US officials pressured Canada to stop ‘Freedom Convoy,’ new testimony reveals "

    • @flyingnan2520
      @flyingnan2520 Месяц назад +2

      Does Canada has any other choice? Canada even arrested the princess of Huawei to please US.

  • @takfaazul5408
    @takfaazul5408 Месяц назад +38

    Canada doing everything to help out USA'a over rated and prohibitively expensive Tesla EV

  • @tomtube1012
    @tomtube1012 Месяц назад +43

    Unlike the US, Canada doesn't even have any domestic car companies to protect.
    Canada's "car industry" consists of manufacturing a few models for foreign companies, but they could've struck similar deals with Chinese companies. This will GROW our "car industry".
    Canada only produce a handful of foreign cars domestically. Most cars we buy are already imported. *Most cars we make are exported* . Cheap Chinese EVs won't hurt domestic vehicle production cause most of what we produce goes to the US and they won't have cheap Chinese EVs to compete with so they'll keep taking the cars we produce.

    • @logomo7
      @logomo7 Месяц назад

      Canada is American's muppet, simply put.

    • @edwinhuang803
      @edwinhuang803 18 дней назад

      Saw some news reports from CBC, Global News, etc. Their invited experts didn't even mention the poinst you just made.

  • @DrumguyCiv
    @DrumguyCiv Месяц назад +39

    Tariffs are meant to make it less economical for the manufacturer to compete in our market, but in reality it makes it harder for the average consumer to afford an EV. If Canadian manufacturers cannot provide a lower cost product, why shouldn’t China be allowed to ship their product to our country in order to make it more affordable for the average consumer? The only entity that seems to be protected by tariffs is an already wealthy business owner.

    • @ihappeningcommunications8318
      @ihappeningcommunications8318 Месяц назад +3

      Let's start a Anti Tariff Revolution

    • @DrumguyCiv
      @DrumguyCiv Месяц назад

      @@ihappeningcommunications8318 well, we could just quit protecting the bottom line of big corporations so much.

    • @Boyaytb
      @Boyaytb Месяц назад +4

      US daddy said do it

    • @DrumguyCiv
      @DrumguyCiv Месяц назад +2

      @@Boyaytb and therefore as their northern neighbour we must oblige. No thanks!

    • @peterlai9018
      @peterlai9018 Месяц назад

      @@DrumguyCiv Potatoes-deau has no choice. If he refuses he gets removed from office.

  • @SUPERFLUID88
    @SUPERFLUID88 Месяц назад +21

    Thank you for keeping cheaper cars out of the Canadian market we love the overpriced shit boxes the big 3 produces

  • @fatdoi003
    @fatdoi003 Месяц назад +20

    True-d'oh is protecting an EV industry they don't have but destroying the canola industry they do have..... what a genius piece of politics

  • @tomtube1012
    @tomtube1012 Месяц назад +21

    Can somebody tell me what EV Canada produces? As far as I know, Canada does NOT produce any EVs! What are we protecting lol.
    If we're gonna place tariffs, we should put tariffs on ICE car imports, NOT EVs!!

    • @ihappeningcommunications8318
      @ihappeningcommunications8318 Месяц назад

      Correct. We are just Doggos fir Uncle Sam... F them, let people eat, let them havec$10k ev... now!

    • @pkerlei
      @pkerlei Месяц назад

      going green and carbon tax is a lie, the government just wants a way to get your money, we are too rich for those cheap Chinese cars.

  • @robvannNS
    @robvannNS Месяц назад +37

    This us what you get when you are under the thumb of the US.

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 Месяц назад

      Check out some of their ev
      ruclips.net/video/fDTM9Xh5bqE/видео.html

  • @Dihorse371
    @Dihorse371 Месяц назад +11

    If Canada is geniune on putting tariff on any subsidy, do a thorough reseaech on ALL cars imported and do the same to everbody.

  • @nobeer9785
    @nobeer9785 Месяц назад +13

    It's very hard for Canadian policy not to follow or somewhat parallel to USA foreign policy.
    We have CIA, US ex-marine/CIA and US military personnels in almost every corner of our Federal government and National Defense.

  • @moonbox3381
    @moonbox3381 Месяц назад +8

    sorry poor Canadian , we had no choice ,must obey US order with out question asked

  • @johnleong4807
    @johnleong4807 Месяц назад

    Thank you Sam for bringing to a whole new ball game on EV complex issues as an independent and to be a solidarity Country leaving the politics aside.

  • @howardhan2101
    @howardhan2101 Месяц назад +2

    So well said, great job done Sam!❤

  • @polysporin8332
    @polysporin8332 Месяц назад +7

    Instead of putting tariffs on Chinese cars. Get China to manufacture them in Canada to create jobs. Of course USA foreign policy would not be happy.

  • @estchu
    @estchu Месяц назад +5

    The forum is presented as if Canada were an independent and sovereign country. But it is not. the content must be viewed in respect to the American policies. This is an exemplary case study of When the US says jump, Canada says how high.

  • @silentnoise713
    @silentnoise713 Месяц назад +7

    Canadians get to buy American cars since the rest of the world is buying Chinese EVs. This is great for the US but I don’t understand how this helps Canadians..? Counter argument, CA doesn’t have electric grip to support this.?

  • @sunnys2864
    @sunnys2864 Месяц назад +4

    Tariffs only work when domestic products are competitive with the imported products and need a little bit of economic advantage. But if there are no competitive products, the tariffs only hurt the local consumers. Either don’t buy the products or pay heavy prices.

  • @AZNinsomnia02
    @AZNinsomnia02 Месяц назад +4

    at this point we might as well call ourselves another state of the US. Why are we kowtowing to these warmongering clowns?

  • @fool9111z
    @fool9111z Месяц назад +6

    Canada has committed 53 billions in support and subsidies for EV car manufacturers since 2020. That’s 12000 dollars per capita. For a family of four, the government has already spent 50K dollars before you even buy your first EV.
    Ouch! That’s expensive.
    There are subsidies that provide support and impetus for manufacturers to develop competitive products and eventually can stand on their own in the marketplace.
    There are also subsidies that are effective corporate welfare and in the name of keeping jobs, becomes a permanent fixture of the industry.
    I wonder which one is Canada’s financial support intends to be.

  • @HiggsBoson2149
    @HiggsBoson2149 Месяц назад +3

    Elizabeth May: word salad.
    Sam Gindin: insightful meaningful comments.
    Gobind Dhugee: huh?

  • @rastoferi6012
    @rastoferi6012 Месяц назад +9

    Who's paying for tariff anyway?

    • @HiggsBoson2149
      @HiggsBoson2149 Месяц назад +1

      Any car dealer who wants to sell cars in Canada would pay the tariff. They would then add the tariff to the price of the car when trying to sell it. But since the price would be so high with a 100% tariff, no customer will buy the car anyways. So bottom line, the cars will never be imported to be sold in the first place.

    • @rastoferi6012
      @rastoferi6012 Месяц назад +1

      @@HiggsBoson2149 if the gov don't want Chinese cars, why not just ban it like they did Huawei phones?

    • @joes6620
      @joes6620 Месяц назад +2

      ​@@rastoferi6012 They wants to make money from you by selling expensive cars. The phones can't make as much.

    • @rastoferi6012
      @rastoferi6012 Месяц назад +2

      ​@@joes6620tariffs sound like more tax to me

    • @joes6620
      @joes6620 Месяц назад

      @@rastoferi6012 Sorry, what I meant 'they' are refering the government.

  • @greatharmony2669
    @greatharmony2669 Месяц назад +3

    It puzzles me a lot why western country leaders now are likely to introduce policies (defence, finance, industry, etc) to please US government, not for the benefit of their own countries.
    Canada is no exception. USA interests is the top priority, Canadian interests is the last.

    • @timtimtubetube
      @timtimtubetube Месяц назад

      Stockholm syndrome

    • @remix-yy1hs
      @remix-yy1hs Месяц назад

      Because they are all one. They all work for satan

  • @RolandLau4x
    @RolandLau4x Месяц назад

    Canada is doing its best. Congratulations from the USA

  • @Hystericall
    @Hystericall Месяц назад +4

    Good paying Union jobs making horse buggies ... yeah, that'll really make Canada competitive.

  • @Banmuyuan
    @Banmuyuan Месяц назад +5

    Do people in Canada want the 100% tariff on Chinese EVs by paying double the price? Don’t you have democracy? You should have a say in this matter.

    • @palmpalm5131
      @palmpalm5131 Месяц назад +2

      That tells you something doesn’t it? What democracy? What sovereignty? We vote but it doesn’t get us what we want and it doesn’t improve our lives. The interests of big corporations and US takes precedence over everyday Canadians.

    • @Banmuyuan
      @Banmuyuan Месяц назад

      @@palmpalm5131 we also don’t get to vote on tariff issues in the US.

    • @nobeer9785
      @nobeer9785 Месяц назад

      Voters never have a chance to choose which person can become candidates. We can only choose what the different oligarchs in each party's choice of candidates.
      That's why we have been choosing "bad apples" constantly..

  • @zzzzzz7379
    @zzzzzz7379 Месяц назад +1

    Same as solar panels - >160% tariff on Chinese PV since 2016

  • @blackknight4996
    @blackknight4996 Месяц назад +9

    You can charge 1000% when the Chinese just ignore the Canadian market 😂😂 and you can be United Snake's lapdog happily.

  • @康康-u8o
    @康康-u8o Месяц назад +5

    Is Canada a colony of USA ?

  • @ze9947
    @ze9947 Месяц назад +1

    There was a saying in the mainland in the past: I would rather have socialist grass than capitalist seedlings. For the sake of ideals, I don't need material enjoyment. Now Canada is also implementing this theory. It's good news. It seems that human thoughts are the same regardless of socialism or capitalism.

  • @patbyrneme007
    @patbyrneme007 Месяц назад

    It would have been great if the panel had also talked about the many other advantages of cheap electric vehicles for reducing the cost of living and production, reducing urban air and noise pollution etc.
    Also, bringing Chinese EV companies to produce in Canada is important. Apart from saving some jobs it would also give Canada the chance to increase their exports to the US and expose the North American free trade agreement.

  • @patbyrneme007
    @patbyrneme007 Месяц назад

    What Sam is arguing for is 'social unionism' which is the best way forward for the workers movement.

  • @Hystericall
    @Hystericall Месяц назад +3

    Lol, Musk says thank you for his 2nd Trillion USD. $$$ All the way to the bank.

  • @aliyap4580
    @aliyap4580 Месяц назад +1

    Gain for countries importing for their population; exporter has nothing to lose. 😁

  • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
    @kaimingraymondchoi9909 Месяц назад

    Political leaders are the cheapest yet the most profitable commodity to acquire. Once acquired they will follow your policy and strategies meticulously even at the expense of his own country. Regarding the Chinese EV, the West is putting high tariff on them on the basis that the EV industry is receiving too much government subsidy. From a "green' member point of view, cheap EV from China to Canada is effectively subsidizing Canada to reduce emission. Isn't it not?

  • @jacintochua6885
    @jacintochua6885 Месяц назад

    Canada doesn't even have a local automotive industry. So what exactly is it protecting?

  • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
    @kaimingraymondchoi9909 Месяц назад +1

    Canada does not have a strong motor industry, like China 10-15 years ago. But Canada has abundant electricity supply and a huge market at its door step. They are ideal elements for the development of motor industry. Yet, Canada geoploitical restraint prohibited it to develop any industry in direct competition with its closest neighbor. Sorry my Canadian friends.

    • @nobeer9785
      @nobeer9785 Месяц назад

      Canadian electricity abundancy depend on locations. We lack inter- provincial electricity connections to fix this. (We need more basic infrastructure)

    • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
      @kaimingraymondchoi9909 Месяц назад

      Should Canada nd China be-friend to each other, China's high-voltage transmission line will serve Canada's need with ultra-high efficiency. All it has to avoid is to support US global hegemony which is anti-civilisation.

  • @griffinrush3003
    @griffinrush3003 Месяц назад

    I would like to hear Dimitri Lascaris' opinion.

  • @jamesji3986
    @jamesji3986 Месяц назад

    The panelists have very good ideas and even good plans. It is correct that the population needs to be mobilized in order to make the huge changes that you wish to occur and the society desperately need. I think the biggest immediate difficulty you will be facing is that your voice is several orders of magnitude lower that what the big corporate news media are able to make. Your voice won't be able to reach the public effectively.

  • @carmenlajoie2719
    @carmenlajoie2719 Месяц назад +3

    Should follow state media in China, impressive environmental Innitiatives happening. CGTN The Point-Hub-Heat, Shanghai Eye, Reporterfy Media-Cyrus Janssen.

  • @a9udn9u-vanced
    @a9udn9u-vanced Месяц назад

    Canada discussing foreign orders from their southern masters.

  • @jacintochua6885
    @jacintochua6885 Месяц назад

    Picking new boogie man., Western politicians never knew about diplomacy. They always relied on force.

  • @riojoe5156
    @riojoe5156 Месяц назад

    It's hard to be a vassal state. It's ok. Chinese does not wish to bother with canada anyway.

  • @normanquach4655
    @normanquach4655 Месяц назад

    100%tarifss on China but Canadian have to pay it.,....ha ha 😅😅😂😊😊😊

  • @willxwan6113
    @willxwan6113 Месяц назад

    Don’t bother. Canada has no need to handle foreign relations. To make a profit from playing foreign policy game, it demands a strong national capabilities, both economic power and human resource power. Canada lacks both.

  • @jizhang75
    @jizhang75 Месяц назад

    Canada want lead on ev industry ( by Canadian primary minister) by how?

    • @wkclaw
      @wkclaw Месяц назад

      Canada can not be the lead of anything, even a PM.

  • @MathTidbits
    @MathTidbits Месяц назад

    why not impose 200 % ? If Trump comes back to the seat of power, Canada would be in good graces with him , and will find a way to turn MAGA into MA&CGA.

  • @urgeeked3977
    @urgeeked3977 Месяц назад

    😂😂 this is literal proof of Canada trying to be like the Americans but at the same time they wanna act different

  • @KMuse99
    @KMuse99 Месяц назад

    Canada.. climate change is the most existential to humanity, then puts 100% tax on cheap clean tech from China 😂

  • @lfish57
    @lfish57 Месяц назад

    I rather pay 30k for my EV Verse 80k.

  • @JoeMercer-g4s
    @JoeMercer-g4s Месяц назад +3

    YES is The answer to "100% Tariffs on China's EVs: Is this Canada's "Just Transition"? Because the whole "Just Transition" is BS.

    • @palmpalm5131
      @palmpalm5131 Месяц назад

      You WANT the 100% tariffs? You WANT to pay more for EVs?

  • @testgood9384
    @testgood9384 Месяц назад

    Overcapacity

  • @ihappeningcommunications8318
    @ihappeningcommunications8318 Месяц назад +6

    We want $10k EVs or face folks REBELLION!

  • @ZheWang-vb9yw
    @ZheWang-vb9yw Месяц назад +2

    Part of this decision is probably sunken cost fallacy by Trudeau with his proposed EV manufacturing factory that won't be able to produce an EV car for some years and by that point we won't even know if they can produce a competitive product.
    In the meantime, we're stuck with 2x consumer EV prices and we're getting hit with reciprocal tariffs on our goods in Chinese markets. Especially the farming sector, which makes up 100+ times more trade of Canada's exports than Chinese EVs make up our imports - seriously a dumb tradeoff: Chinese EVs make up little of our imports, we don't have existing EV manufacturing to protect only a risky proposed one years down the line, and in return we consumers get no competitive products for many years, the things we actually trade with China such as our agricultural exports get hit to lower EV imports which makes up very little of our trade and to protect domestic EV manufacturing which currently makes little to none of our economy. Also our future EVs will most likely use parts of China's renewable energy supply chain if they want to be competitive anyways and we may be setting ourselves up for restrictions if we maintain or ramp protectionist trade policies.
    Also I for one would love to see Canada subsidize it's domestic manufacturing at the expense of capital e.g. capital taxes rather than subsidizing manufacturing at the expense of it's costumers via tariffs- but hey that would require the govt to have good foresight and not push consequences down to it's citizens.

  • @jerryj5606
    @jerryj5606 Месяц назад

    Just a US pet

  • @willxwan6113
    @willxwan6113 Месяц назад +1

    By following the Americans, Canadians won’t go to bed hungry.

  • @danielc9329
    @danielc9329 Месяц назад

    Tariff = extra tax on Canadians! How would tariffs on China's EVs benefit the Canadians?