How Governments Encourage Renewable Energy and Electric Vehicles

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 дек 2020
  • The most effective policies for cutting emissions from the electricity and transportation sectors, the two largest sources of CO2e. Watch the full episode: tdc.video/programs/the-best-p...
    Robbie Orvis: energyinnovation.org/team-mem...
    Designing Climate Solutions: www.energypolicy.solutions/gu...
    Exploring the most successful policies around the world for solving Climate Change by targeting and cutting CO2e emissions. With Robbie Orvis, author of Designing Climate Solutions: A policy Guide for Low-Carbon Energy. Orvis is Director of Energy Policy Design at Energy Innovations.
    Fifty percent of all greenhouse gasses come from just seven countries. This is a presentation of the best policies for cutting those emissions and stopping global warming.
    In the first episode of this series we learned who the biggest emitters are. In the second, Dr. Francis taught us how those emissions are warming the planet and disrupting the global climate systems.
    In this video we’ll explore the most successful policies for targeting and cutting emissions that are in place around the world. And who better to guide us than the person who wrote the book on the subject, Robbie Orvis. [Director of Energy Policy Design, Energy Innovations]
    Designing Climate Solutions is an accessible tool for examining all the good work being done to tackle climate change. In it, Orvis and his team analyzed every type of emissions reduction policy around the world to figure out which are most effective. Their premise is simple: to solve this crisis we need to learn from each other what works best as quickly as possible. It was a huge inspiration and help for me in putting this series together so it’s great to be able to hear from Robbie directly.
    Generating electricity through the combustion of coal and methane natural gas is currently responsible for the most emissions around the world. There are two main policies to encourage utilities to invest in wind and solar energy production: feed-in tariffs and renewable energy tax credits.
    And where we’re going is to an electrify everything strategy to take advantage of all the renewable electricity we’ll soon be generating. The main fossil fuel consumer in the United States is now the transportation sector. So far, the primary tool for governments to lower gasoline consumption, cut emissions, and increase investment in new technologies, like electric vehicles, has been a vehicle performance standard. This sets a minimum limit on the miles per gallon a manufacturer’s entire fleet of vehicles must average.

Комментарии • 33

  • @FabioTheGreat
    @FabioTheGreat 3 года назад +17

    One of my favorite channel is back. I watched all your video about city. It just wohoo, mind-blowing... The one about Paris was my favorite.

    • @TDC_TheDocumentaryChannel
      @TDC_TheDocumentaryChannel  3 года назад +7

      Thank you! Part two of this episode will feature solutions for cities to cut emissions by becoming more pedestrian-friendly. I'll be posting it on Monday, December 7th so keep an eye out 😉

    • @FabioTheGreat
      @FabioTheGreat 3 года назад +2

      @@TDC_TheDocumentaryChannel I'll be looking forward. The bell button is already on. Keep up the good work.

  • @onalos1271
    @onalos1271 3 года назад +6

    Good to see your content again!

  • @2Zemog
    @2Zemog 3 года назад +9

    I feel like it would be worthwhile to mention the EV incentives in Norway.

  • @Sir.Craze-
    @Sir.Craze- 3 года назад +3

    Is it the efficiency of all cars sold or all the ones manufactured?
    Because that's a pretty big freeking (for emphasis) difference.

  • @kenjohnson6101
    @kenjohnson6101 3 года назад +2

    I used to be involved in vehicle feebate policy and attended an industry symposium that Amory Lovins hosted on the topic many years ago. It's hard to make a feebate policy work for a heterogenous market like passenger vehicles because of the cross-subsidies it creates between different vehicle classes. One way to get around that limitation would be to apply a feebate-type policy to manufacturers' fleet-wide average emissions, rather than individual vehicle models -- similar to a fuel economy standard but with the "standard" replaced by an incentive. Credit trading would be supplanted by feebate revenue transfers.
    A similar policy could be used in the utility power market, and was used quite effectively by Sweden in the 1990's for NOx regulation. (In this context the "feebates" are called "Refunded Emission Payments".)
    www.airclim.org/sites/default/files/acidnews_pdf/AN2-00.pdf

  • @adriskhan8733
    @adriskhan8733 3 года назад +3

    Post more regularly please

  • @hargibson18
    @hargibson18 3 года назад +1

    The regional/semi-private ERCOT isn't looking quite as great given the failures in management and preparation we've just witnessed in Texas.

  • @TheDeathcloud123
    @TheDeathcloud123 3 года назад +4

    You’re alive???!?!?

  • @vijaykurmi8109
    @vijaykurmi8109 2 года назад +1

    In my country ( india) they are increasing price of fuel . So that they are indirectly forcing people to buy electric vehicles, induction cooking stove , and cng vehicles , etc.

  • @xjing800
    @xjing800 3 года назад +3

    damn i gotta share this

  • @Dragonluna69
    @Dragonluna69 2 года назад

    Great video

  • @pedromiguel562
    @pedromiguel562 3 года назад +1

    I am watch a great problem however when corps like BP and others begin to mke this option and accept. Gone be a short more easy BUT not so much because dont depend only of they. Got it? Click in accept the thermes. Read please and got a OPITON if NOT ... yew.

  • @koohami
    @koohami 3 года назад

    why wasn't you showing up on my subscription list?

  • @FunBotan
    @FunBotan 3 года назад +5

    Correction: the best solutions if we don't consider modifying people's behaviors

  • @kimlibera663
    @kimlibera663 3 года назад +1

    Seems this is all about subsidies or penalizing people. That's not worth the switch.

  • @HKChineseCanadian
    @HKChineseCanadian Год назад

    Excellent, we need an update. China is really leading the world in Renewable Energy and Electric Vehicles.

  • @rdvqc
    @rdvqc 3 года назад

    The benefit of an EV is dependent on its "fuel" source. A lot of electricity is still pretty "dirty". I am fortunate to live in Quebec where power is not expensive and primarily hydro generated. I currently drive a plug-in hybrid and go months between gas fills around home.

  • @Lildizzle420
    @Lildizzle420 3 года назад +1

    it never includes population growth or developing countries, or the fact that 0 car factories are actually being converted and only new ones are being built. its the best solution if you ignore people in netherlands who bike, 6-7 billion of us who walk

  • @robertcallaghan4029
    @robertcallaghan4029 3 года назад +1

    0.45% of vehicles are electric, renewables are 4% of energy, solar & wind are 2% of energy
    Electricity is 20% of energy so 100% renewable electricity is 20% of all energy use
    If electricity is 30% of energy by 2050, 80% renewable electricity will be 24% of energy

  • @robertcallaghan4029
    @robertcallaghan4029 3 года назад

    1% of people control 75% of farmland -- 80% of food grows on small farms
    0.5% of vehicles are electric, 2% of energy is solar & wind
    20% of energy is electricity, 100% renewable electricity = 20% of energy
    *Direct Impacts of Climate Heating*
    ▷ Heat stress is reducing crop yields.
    ▷ Heat stress toll on farmers (sometimes fatal).
    ▷ Heat stress tolls on livestock (often fatal).
    ▷ Altered precipitation: not enough rain; drought.
    ▷ Altered precipitation: too much rain; flooding.
    ▷ Weather whiplashing between drought and flooding (or heat and cold) ruining crops.
    ▷ Extreme weather physically damaging crops: hail storms, late Spring frosts, early Fall frosts, early warmth confusing plants to bud prematurely, followed by killing frosts.
    ▷ Wildfires physically destroying crops and livestock and polluting water supplies.
    ▷ Smoke and other wildfire pollutants damage crops hundreds of km from the burn areas.
    ▷ Extreme weather damaging food storage infrastructure, disrupting food transportation systems, breaking down “cold chain” systems.
    All of these above effects are already cascading into a variety of secondary effects.
    Secondary Impacts
    ▷ Crop and farm failures, financing challenges, farmer migration and suicides, general strikes.
    ▷ Loss of agricultural labour and resource conflicts.
    ▷ Crop stress causes stress on seeds and seed viability damage, causing poor crop yields in subsequent years.
    ▷ Drought and sea-level rise causes salinization contamination is soils and farmland, reducing crop yields for years.
    ▷ Heat, drought, and overuse of pesticides wipes out good beetles, butterflies, bees, and other pollinators.
    ▷ Changing precipitation patterns leads to increased breeding of locusts and other crop harming pests.
    ▷ Drought dries out soils leading to wind blown soil loss and desertification.
    ▷ Drought and decreases glacial water storage and groundwater infiltration, drying up rivers and amplifying water stress in subsequent years.
    ▷ Torrential rain leading to flooding caused soil erosion, destroys crops and infrastructure, and carries over to subsequent growing seasons.
    ▷ Crop losses impact feed prices and supply for the following year.
    -- Beckwith et al 2020 YT
    Oceans took 89% of the heat and they're going to blow, see Loki's Revenge Green Energy Fraud
    I don't how to say that in academic gibberish, so I'll just let the gibberish do the talking...
    Vaclave Smil Explains Load Capacity Factor: - Vaclav Smil 2020 YT @ 18:14 - 1 min
    ▷ Offshore North Euro wind turbines work 30% of the time
    ▷ Onshore North Euro wind turbines work 22% of the time
    ▷ North Euro solar panels work 11% of the time
    ▷ If you put a wind turbine offshore of Texas it’ll work 35% of the time
    Europe burns 80% of wood pellet shipments for “renewable” electricity - Science Alert 2018
    Global wood pellet production grew from 2 Mt in 2000 to 30 Mt in 2016 - Wiley 2017
    Europe burns 40% of its recycled plastic and paper for “recycled” electricity - Nat Geo 2018
    Sweden burns rubbish for electricity and food waste as bio gas fuel - Sweden Nature 2020
    Burning trees for electricity produces 30% more C02 than burning coal - WRI 2017
    Europe burns almost 50% of its palm oil imports in cars and trucks - Ecologistas en Acción 2016
    Sustainable certified palm oil linked to worse social, ecological outcomes for natives - Mongabay 2020
    UN carbon offset talks erode human rights safeguards - Climate Home News 2019
    UN agency hit with corruption allegations at climate projects - FT 2020
    UN-backed climate fund faces wave of abuse allegations - FT 2020
    Up to 75% of carbon offsets are fraud - ProPublica 2019
    Fossil fuels remained 80% of global energy for over 25 years - Climate Change News 2019
    Emissions must fall 50% in 10 years to stay under 1.5 C - Sci Am 2019
    Emissions must fall 50% in 10 years to stay under 1.5 C - Insurance Journal 2019
    Efforts to protect nature on a global scale have failed spectacularly - AFP 2020
    Vaclav Smil: Why batteries and EVs will take a long time - Vaclav Smil 2019 YT @ 27 :38
    ▷ Jets are 68% more efficient in 60 years and fly 60 times more people
    ▷ 4.4 billion air trips were taken in 2018 - 2.63 billion in 2010
    ▷ If batteries were 6X more efficient we would use 60X more of them
    Earth Has An Energy Imbalance and is Heating Dangerously Fast
    1968 - 1992 earth heating averaged 1 Hiroshima nuke / sec - Skeptical Science 2014
    From 1998 - 2020 earth heating averaged 5 nukes / sec - Skeptical Science 2020
    Earth is heating at 400,000 Hrioshima nukes per day - James Hansen 2020
    ▷ 1971 - 2018 global heating averaged 0.47 watts/m²
    ▷ 2010 - 2018 heating went up to 0.87 watts/m²
    ▷ A 46% increase, oceans absorb 89% of the heat - air absorbs 1%
    ▷ Oceans are reaching their limit for absorbing heat
    ▷ When the ocean sneezes we all get the flu
    Electricity is 20% of energy - renewable is 4% - solar & wind are 2%
    4% of mammals are wild by weight - 0.4% of cars are electric
    Solar & wind are 2% of energy - IEA 2020 < this link has interactive chart
    Geothermal solar wind etc are 2% of energy - Statista 2020 < Other 2%
    4% of energy is renewable - WSJ BP 2019
    Projected energy sources to 2040 - Statista 2020 = 15% by 2040
    2050 : Energy demand to increase 50% - EIA 2019
    2050 : 50% of electricity will be renewable - EIA 2019
    24% of global energy will be electricity by 2040 - IEA 2019
    So if by 2050, 80% of electricity is renewable, and 30% of energy is electricity, then 24% of energy is renewable
    Vaclav Smil: why batteries and EVs will take a long time - Vaclav Smil 2019 YT @ 27 :38
    ▷ Over 60 yrs, jets are 68% more efficient and fly 60X more passengers
    ▷ 4.4 billion air trips were taken in 2018 - 2.63 billion in 2010
    ▷ If batteries were 60X more efficient we would use 60X more of them
    Water Stress Threatens Near 50% of World’s Thermal Power Plant Capacity - WRI 2017
    30% of planned hydro projects threatened by water stress - WWF 2020
    44 % of existing coal power plants are in areas with high water stress - Unearthed 2016
    Coal plants risk global water shortage - google 2020
    Expect More Mega-Droughts - Science Daily 2020
    Dams produce more methane than rice plantations and biomass burning - Guardian 2016
    Dams harm estuary wetlands - Science Advances 2019
    66% of people will live in water stressed areas by 2025
    - Nat Geo 2020
    Fresh water availability has dropped 20% in 20 years - 3 billion affected
    - Guardian 2020
    4 billion people live one month per year in water shressed areas
    - Sci Adv 2016
    Water use for fracking has risen by up to 770% since 2011
    - Science Daily 2018
    Fracking dewaters drinking water aquifers
    - Global Energy Monitor 2009

  • @robertcallaghan4029
    @robertcallaghan4029 3 года назад

    Every day I believe in 6 impossible things before breakfast. I do this by making 6 YT comments I believe won't be shadow banned on YT.

  • @robertcallaghan4029
    @robertcallaghan4029 3 года назад +1

    *Why Battery Efficiency is The Disease not The Cure*
    ▷ Jets are 68% more efficient over 60 years and fly 60 times more people
    ▷ 4.4 billion air trips were taken in 2018 - 2.63 billion in 2010
    ▷ If batteries were 6X more efficient we would use 60X more of them

    • @Sir.Craze-
      @Sir.Craze- 3 года назад

      I'm sorry but these claims are pretty hard to take or make any sense of without any context. I invite you to give some?
      What do you mean by "taken" for instance?
      Why would we need billions of airstrip's, one for almost every person?
      Jets are 68% more efficient at what? Compared to what? Running on what? 60 times more people then what?
      Why would more efficient batteries cause the use of more?
      What is your definition of efficiency?
      If it's the ability to hold 6x "more" electricity, power something 6x longer, ect. Then would not they be 6x smaller, assuming its for the same purpose?
      I honestly would like to know what your thoughts are as you make some hefty claims that if true are very important. But you can't just claim things with 0 context and expect anyone smart to Listen, no offence.

    • @robertcallaghan4029
      @robertcallaghan4029 3 года назад

      @@Sir.Craze- lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/green-fraud/