3 times square root 20 + 7 times the square root 5 all over square root 2 times square root 3 =?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @Stylux-z1p
    @Stylux-z1p Месяц назад +1

    [3√20 + 7√5] / [√2 x √3]
    [3√(4 x 5) + 7√5] / [√6]
    [3 x 2√( 5) + 7√5] / [√6]
    [6√( 5) + 7√5] / [√6]
    [13√ 5] / [√6] ---> Rationalizing the Denominator by multiplying both numerator/denominator with √6
    To preserve the ratio of the expression
    [√6][13√ 5] / [√6][√6]
    [13√30] / 6 --->ANS

  • @bigdog3628
    @bigdog3628 Месяц назад

    Super simple:
    (When you have fraction exponents the numerator is the power and the denominator is the root.)
    Numerator:
    3(20^1/2) + 7(5^1/2)
    3(4^1/2 * 5^1/2) + 7(5^1/2)
    6(5 ^ 1/2) + 7(5^1/2)
    13(5^1/2)
    Denominator:
    (2^1/2) * (3^1/2)
    6^1/2
    We can NOT have a radical in the denominator so we must get rid of sqr of 6 by finding the next multiple of it that is a perfect square
    6^1/2 * 6^1/2
    36^1/2 or just 6
    Since we multiplied the denominator by 6^1/2 me must also multiply the numerator by 6^1/2
    13(5^1/2 * 6^1/2)
    13(30^1/2)
    Final answer is [13(30^1/2)] as nothing can be simplified further.

    • @gavindeane3670
      @gavindeane3670 Месяц назад

      @@bigdog3628 Of course we can have radicals in denominators. They're just numbers. It's fine.
      Nobody outside of mindless dogmatic schoolteachers gives a toss. The entire mathematical world is absolutely fine with, for example, the sine and cosine of 45 degrees being 1/√2. It's completely normal.

  • @chrisdissanayake6979
    @chrisdissanayake6979 Месяц назад

    Thank you Sir!
    I had forgotten that we can’t have a square root as the denominator and we have to rationalize!
    🙏🏽

    • @gavindeane3670
      @gavindeane3670 Месяц назад

      @@chrisdissanayake6979 That's a good thing to forget because it's incorrect.
      We can have a square root in the denominator. It's normal and completely fine. This guy's obsession with it has no mathematical basis whatsoever.
      But if you prefer to follow his style then rationalising the denominator is obviously fine too.

  • @panlomito
    @panlomito Месяц назад

    3V20 + 7V5 / V6 = (3V20 + 7V5) . V6 / V6.V6 = 3V120 + 7V30 / 6
    ( 120 = 3 . 2 . 2 . 2 . 5 so V120 = 2V30 )
    = 3 . 2V30 + 7V30 / 6 = 6V30 + 7V30 / 6 = 13V30 / 6

  • @johnfilak4751
    @johnfilak4751 Месяц назад +1

    You are not solving here you are simplifying ; )

  • @venapachuau325
    @venapachuau325 Месяц назад

    👍

  • @undercoveragent9889
    @undercoveragent9889 Месяц назад

    1/26 of this video was dedicated to requesting subscriptions. Or, 3.85%, if you prefer.

  • @johnmarchington3146
    @johnmarchington3146 Месяц назад

    I ended up with 13 root 30 divided by 6. It was quite complicated.

  • @Christopherdpenha
    @Christopherdpenha Месяц назад

    Respectful should mean calling a JACKASS a JACKASS

  • @subasu478
    @subasu478 Месяц назад

    I got it.i was little confused at first.

  • @krunoslavregvar477
    @krunoslavregvar477 Месяц назад

    6√5+7√5=13√5 so, we have
    13√5/√6 * √6/√6=(13√30)/6

  • @sekharb6651
    @sekharb6651 Месяц назад

    13rt5/6

  • @russelllomando8460
    @russelllomando8460 Месяц назад

    got (13 sr 30) / 6 just took time as you explained thanks for the fun

  • @josephlaura7387
    @josephlaura7387 Месяц назад

    13sq.root of 30/6

  • @MadeByTriniLena
    @MadeByTriniLena Месяц назад

    👀👀

  • @gopherspace8571
    @gopherspace8571 Месяц назад

    👍👋🙏💪🌎😎

  • @Christopherdpenha
    @Christopherdpenha Месяц назад

    John the JACKASS, you should be ashamed, to make a kindergarten stuff look so difficult

  • @alamo11
    @alamo11 Месяц назад

    you lost me

  • @gavindeane3670
    @gavindeane3670 Месяц назад +1

    √20 = √(4×5) = √4 × √5 = 2√5
    So the numerator is
    6√5 + 7√5 = 13√5
    The denominator is
    √2 × √3 = √(2×3) = √6
    So the whole expression simplifies to
    13√5 / √6 = 13√(⅚)
    Contrary to the nonsense in the video, √6 in the denominator is absolutely fine. Mathematics has no problem with irratuonal numbers in denominators. It's normal.
    But if you prefer to rationalise the denominator then just multiply by √6 / √6 to get
    (13√5 × √6) / (√6 × √6)
    13√30 / 6
    AND FOR CHRIST'S SAKE STOP EXPLAINING √6 × √6 = 6 LIKE THAT!!!
    This has got to be one of your absolute STUPIDEST repetitive mistakes.
    √6 × √6 = 6 because that's the DEFINITION of a square root. It doesn't need any more explanation of that.
    The only reason someone wouldn't already know that √6 × √6 = 6 is if they don't know what a square root is.
    Why would you not explain to them what a square root is? In a video that's all about square roots, you're happy for people to get to the end and still not understand this basic point!

    • @bigdog3628
      @bigdog3628 Месяц назад

      I will agree to disagree with you here.