The Hardest Exam Question | Only 6% of students solved it correctly

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
  • High School Entrance Examination | A tricky challenge
    What do you think about this question? If you're reading this ❤️. Have a great day! Check out my latest video:
    Can You Pass Harvard University Entrance Exam?
    • Can You Pass Harvard U...
    Everything is possible in math: • Everything is possible...
    Can You Pass Harvard's Entrance Exam?: • Can You Pass Harvard's...
    Hello My Friend ! Welcome to my channel. I really appreciate it!
    ‪@higher_mathematics‬
    #maths #math

Комментарии • 59

  • @Asphilomath_2271
    @Asphilomath_2271 2 дня назад +32

    Quicker method: since x^10 is (x^5)², and x^5 is (x²)(x³), (√2-1)^10 is the square of (√2-1)² that is 3-2√2 times (√2-1)³ that is 5√2-7, which is 29√2-41, and its square is 3363-2378√2.

    • @thunderpokemon2456
      @thunderpokemon2456 День назад +3

      Same method got in 3 min dude

    • @flexeos
      @flexeos День назад +1

      what I did too...

    • @marshallnoel2045
      @marshallnoel2045 21 час назад +1

      Much saner approach.

    • @robertveith6383
      @robertveith6383 15 часов назад +1

      Don't use the times sign when doing algebra, especially among x-variables. Use grouping symbols such as parentheses: (x^2)(x^3)

  • @moebadderman227
    @moebadderman227 День назад +14

    (√2 - 1)² = 3 - 2√2
    (√2 - 1)^4 = (3 - 2√2)² = 17 - 12√2
    (√2 - 1)^8 = (17 - 12√2)² = 577 - 408√2
    (√2 - 1)^10 = (√2 - 1)²(√2 - 1)^8 = (3 - 2√2)(577 - 408√2) = 3363 - 2378√2

    • @serhatsakarya3892
      @serhatsakarya3892 День назад +1

      This is so much easier indeed.

    • @ironfbody
      @ironfbody День назад +3

      That's how I did it. Didn't take 17 minutes, and I didn't use a calculator (except to check it at the end)

    • @redmiraja4396
      @redmiraja4396 Час назад

      Simple...how to make a simple problem complex foolishly and create a video is what it's all about.

  • @MD-kv9zo
    @MD-kv9zo 2 дня назад +19

    Since 10 is pretty small(small enough to calculate) you could do it with binomial theorem

    • @klexosia
      @klexosia День назад

      That's how I did it! I got the answer, but it took some time. I think the method shown in the video is faster.

    • @sidharthpatra4751
      @sidharthpatra4751 День назад +1

      Yeah man , i dont understand why they make simpler problems look like its super tough. Here wlso 2nd term of binomial is 1, so the expansion becomes more easily right?

    • @klexosia
      @klexosia День назад +2

      @@sidharthpatra4751 I took it as [-(1-√2)]^10 so I got 1 as the first term, I don't have much experience with binomial equations, but I think that's faster?

  • @douglasmcclure
    @douglasmcclure 8 часов назад +1

    I really enjoyed this video! But in this case, since the square root turns into a whole number when squared, I think it is actually easier just to power through using the original numbers, rather than defining 𝑥 = √2 - 1 and then substituting it back in the end:
    x¹⁰ = x⁸ ⋅ x² = [(x²)²]² ⋅ x²
    So, (√2 − 1)¹⁰ = {[(√2 − 1)²]²}² ⋅ (√2 − 1)²
    STEP 1: (√2 − 1)² = 3 − 2√2
    STEP 2: (3 − 2√2)² = 17 − 12√2
    STEP 3: (17 − 12√2)² = 577 − 408√2
    STEP 4: (577 − 408√2) ⋅ (3 − 2√2) = 3363 − 2378√2

  • @Litmus1974
    @Litmus1974 День назад +6

    Pascal triangle... 2 minutes, exact solution

  • @Segalmed
    @Segalmed 2 дня назад +4

    Let a be (SQRT(2)-1) then the equation can be factored into a² *( a²)² * (a²)²= a² * (a²)²)²
    a² is easy from 2nd binomial formula, squaring this a 2nd and 3rd time is not much more difficult. Now multiply 1st and 3rd term and you're finished.

    • @milan.matejka
      @milan.matejka День назад

      This is probably what most of us started with.

  • @NicolaiLund-q3f
    @NicolaiLund-q3f День назад +6

    You needed a calculator anyway, so instead of “simplifying” over 17 minutes and the using a calculator, you could have used a calculator from the beginning and arrived to same result in less than 15 seconds ;)
    But I do love the arithmetics - always good to refresh :)

    • @petermaling943
      @petermaling943 День назад

      Which would have been marked wrong. The question was seeking the exact answer, not a calculator approximation. I know he fiddled about with a calculator at the end, but the problem was solved before that.

  • @felipecastro4714
    @felipecastro4714 День назад

    Beautiful question! Thank you!

  • @michaeledwards2251
    @michaeledwards2251 2 часа назад

    Demonstrates the incredible accuracy of modern calculators. The difference of too very similar values will show any errors propagation.

  • @michellefranklin3182
    @michellefranklin3182 2 дня назад +3

    Thanks man.

  • @mikecloeter4780
    @mikecloeter4780 2 дня назад +6

    Engineer says 1.5E-4

    • @moebadderman227
      @moebadderman227 День назад

      My brother is an Engineer, and I admire him and his fellow Engineers for making things I could never make; but Mathematics? No.

  • @garignacdevaldis8628
    @garignacdevaldis8628 2 дня назад +6

    I solved it using Pascal's Triangle, fun problem

  • @billrandle4437
    @billrandle4437 6 часов назад

    Evaluate : (√2 - 1)¹⁰.
    There are a number of ways of doing
    this
    I shall use the Binomial Theorem
    Firstly I am going to do some
    preparation
    In order to reduce repetition and
    tedium.
    Now, in the Binomial Expansion of
    (√2 - 1)¹⁰.
    There are 11 terms.
    Each term has the following structure
    (binomial coefficient) x (a power of - √2 x (a power of 1)
    The powers of 1 are each equal to 1
    So each term is now (a binomial coefficient) x (a power of √2 )
    Every term with an even power of 2 is rational these powers are (L₁)
    (-√2)¹⁰=2⁵=32, (-√2)⁸=2⁴=16, (-√2 )⁶=2 ³=8, (-√2 )⁴= (2)²=4, (-√2 )²= 2
    Every term with an odd power of √2 is irrational
    and can be written as a multiple of - √2
    Thus (-√2)⁹= (-√2)⁸⋅〈-√2 )=(2)⁴.-√2 =-16√2 the complete list of these, (L₂)
    - 16√2, - 8√2, - 4√2, - 2√2, - √2.. ... (L₂)
    32,16,8,4,2,1................ ..... ...(L₁)
    The Binomial Coefficients for power 10 are
    1,10. 45, 120, 210, 252, 210, 120,45,10, 1.......... (L₃).
    (These form the 10th row of Pascal'sTriangle, or direct calculations
    using combinations).
    Now we can calculate the value of each term by multiplying each
    corresponding values in lists L₁, L₂ and L₃.
    ( 1x32 + 45x16+210x8+210x4+45x2+1)-
    √2 (10x16+120x8+252x4+120×2+10x1
    Giving (32+720+1680+840+90+1)
    - (160+960+1008+240+10)√2
    =3363 - 2378√2

  • @AvihooI
    @AvihooI День назад +1

    I've done binomial expansion for this one... the other way is obviously a nice shortcut.

  • @broddettabatayo7661
    @broddettabatayo7661 День назад +3

    A binomial theorem is the common solution to that expression, but your solution is so amazing. Thank you sir

  • @peterhickey1218
    @peterhickey1218 День назад

    I'll take your word for it.

  • @JaimeWarlock
    @JaimeWarlock 2 дня назад +2

    But the final answer still takes 6 computer operations to calculate a real number, just like the original. So is it really simplified or just a different format?

    • @AvihooI
      @AvihooI День назад

      Well, for the expression (v-1)^10 = 3363 - 2378*v, the former requires one subtraction and then exponentiation which takes up log(n) multiplications. The latter is one multiplication and one subtraction. It's clearly a much easier expression to compute.

    • @JaimeWarlock
      @JaimeWarlock День назад +1

      @@AvihooI Actually 3363-2378*v^0.5; It takes the same amount of time to do e^(0.5 * ln v) as for e^(10 * ln v); But if we did it all in assembly, I guess the simplified version is actually faster.

    • @AvihooI
      @AvihooI День назад

      @@JaimeWarlock yeah I mean, if you formulate this problem using a logarithm and exponentiation which can be approximated using a Taylor expansion then indeed the simplifcation becomes redundant.
      This is why it depends on whatever computation model/system you're dealing with and what exactly is the problem you're trying to simplify. If the only tools you have are addition and multiplication (and subtraction and division) then the simplified form is better computationally.
      Btw I just noticed that in what I wrote, I forgot to mention that v = sqrt(2)... that expansion is obviously only true when that is the case.

  • @yanssala2214
    @yanssala2214 2 дня назад

    Chefe raiz cuadrada de 2 = (1,4142......) es un numero irracional, asi que si le resto 1 el resultado sigue irracional. Al ser elevado a la potencia 10 la parte entera tendra 10 digitos y la decimal infinitos ...

  • @brian554xx
    @brian554xx День назад +1

    Really close to 1/6726. What's the simplest way to get this answer algebraically?

    • @FatihKarakurt
      @FatihKarakurt День назад +2

      Let a=√2-1 and b=√2+1. ab=1; a+b=2√2. Using ab=1 without explicitly writing in the expansions below.
      (a+b)^2=a^2+b^2+2. a^2+b^2=6
      (a^2+b^2)^2=a^4+b^4+2. a^4+b^4=34
      (a^2+b^2)(a^4+b^4) = a^6+b^6+(a^2+b^2). a^6+b^6=6*33
      (a^4+b^4)^2=a^8+b^8+2. a^8+b^8=34^2-2.
      (a^2+b^2)(a^8+b^8)=a^10+b^10+(a^6+b^6)
      a^10+b^10 = 6*(34^2-2)- 6*33 = 6*(34*33-1) = 6726.
      Note that a

    • @brian554xx
      @brian554xx 21 час назад +1

      @@FatihKarakurt I love you. Please continue to exist!

  • @RealQinnMalloryu4
    @RealQinnMalloryu4 День назад

    (2 ➖ 1)^2^5 (1 ➖ 1)^2^5^1 ( ➖ 1)2^1^1 ()^2^1(x ➖ 2x+1).

  • @hans7831
    @hans7831 Час назад

    (√2-1)^10
    = (√2-1)^10 ×(√2+1)^10 / (√2+1)^10
    = (2-1)^10/ (√2+1)^10
    = 1 / (√2+1)^10
    = (√2+1)^-10
    Bringt genau gar nichts, war aber innovativ 😅😅😅

  • @twitterpaited
    @twitterpaited День назад

    What kind of pen are you using?

  • @baxtermullins1842
    @baxtermullins1842 День назад

    I like at minimum 4 digits maybe 5.

  • @davidgomezbernal3970
    @davidgomezbernal3970 2 дня назад

    X= (√2 - 1) ? X = (√2 - 1)^10

  • @tonyfield2360
    @tonyfield2360 23 часа назад

    Hang on. Right at the end you used a calculator. So why all other stuff ?

  • @-SARTHAKSHARMA
    @-SARTHAKSHARMA 2 дня назад

    Nice❤❤🎉

  • @parathuruthil
    @parathuruthil 2 дня назад

    Very good.

  • @TheWookiee_
    @TheWookiee_ 2 дня назад

    Hmm, am I wrong if i think that should be two results? √2 can be ~ 1,4142 and -1,4142. If you put 1,4142 as a result of √2 your answer is correct, but if you use -1,4142 as a result of √2 then not. Thank you for answer.

    • @milan.matejka
      @milan.matejka День назад

      Funny, where do they teach such science? The result is 3263 - 2378*√2 , so you may insert whatever you think that √2 represents. But in mathematics it is usually a positive number, which square equals 2.

    • @t567698
      @t567698 День назад +1

      No, the square root function is defined as the unique non negative solution.

  • @aritrasaradar3866
    @aritrasaradar3866 2 дня назад

  • @ying-yutzou7692
    @ying-yutzou7692 День назад +2

    This is a stupid problem!

  • @userqiabHuk-z8d
    @userqiabHuk-z8d 2 дня назад +1

    Easy way :
    √2 = 2 ^1/2
    2^1/2*10 - 1
    2^5 - 1
    32-1 = 31 Ans.
    But i haven't learned the binomial theorem that's why I'll prefer this method

    • @notnow7302
      @notnow7302 2 дня назад +1

      You cannot distribute the 10 to the Equation if in the brackets theres subtraction or addition
      since
      (X±Y)^2=X²±2XY-Y²
      If it was
      (XY)^2=X²*Y²
      If it was
      (X/Y)^2=X²/Y²

    • @tonywells6990
      @tonywells6990 2 дня назад +1

      The easy way is often the wrong way.

    • @robertveith6383
      @robertveith6383 15 часов назад

      You are missing needed grouping symbols around the fractional exponent: 2^(1/2)