Amazing.I am from Assam and for the first time I have watched somebody covering the ancient Assam history so nicely. I have read Edward Gait and Padmanath Gohainbarua's book on history of Assam.But some of the facts I came to know from you.Waiting for more videos on Assam brother.
Sir can you make videos on ancient indian military strategy, food, clothing and other day to day matters they faced. Also what is a good book I can read to start learning about Indian history?
Source? I'm maithili and would like to know more. Although to use the word maithili is incorrect imo. It's like saying present day humans have African ancestry. Technically true, but can be misinterpreted. We are not the descendants of those who live in Africa rn
@@randomturd1415Narakasura himself was son of Raja Janak, Sita's father and Naraka too was born of Bhoomidevi like Sita. That makes him Sita's brother.
Baro-Bhuyan kayasthas of Assam were from Kannauj too. I'm myself an Assamese Kayastha. People with surnames like kalitas, Bharalis and Bhuyans are assamese baro Bhuyan kayasthas Mahapurush Srimanta Shankardev, the Vaishnavite polymath of Medieval Assam was a baro Bhuyan kayastha.
@@Oskar_Von_Reuenthal_1how can we believe you ?? When you literally said rajputs have Hun ancestry? Are you mocking them? And srimonto sonkorodevo is not from that caste specifically
Jay Vardhan Sir I am a great fan of yours. I have been watching your videos since last year as I am interested in Ancient Indian History and will be studying higher courses in History belonging to this era. Sir I am from West Bengal and hence I am really curious to know the ancient history of Bengal since the region was Mahajanapada/Janapada called Anga. You know there is an archeological sight called Chandraketugarh situated in the district of North24Parganas which historians and archeologists believe to be even older than the Mauryan Period and the ancient discovered city is mysterious like Harappa as no inscriptions or reference of any king was found. However being so ancient hundreds of beautiful terracotta carvings, sculptures and other drawn data depicting the life lived by people in that city has been minutely detailed. Sir as a curious student it is my earnest request if you could please research about the Chandraketugarh Sight as no one really talks about it.. Many even believe that the chronicle related to Ganga Rhidoy Warriors of which Alexander feared might be the people of Ancient Bengal and Chandraketugarh might be linked to it. Sir it will be a Great Honour of you kindly accept my request. Thankyou Sir.
@@aavcorp.developerseng.3453 Bromins are from central russia, you can check their habits, their rigid rituals and customs, none of them belong to India. That is why they use different vessels for different caste, they want their group to remain distinct
Sir can you make video on oldest surviving evidence of sanatana Dharma like incription in Middle East issue by mittani Kingdom king who wrote Vedic god and it's 1500 bce old
Haors have nothing to do with sea. We name even big lakes as sagar, for example ramsagar lake in Dinajpur district. So, imo it makes more sense that the kings used to live by the side of a haor which are abundant in sylhet area, and the authors of the epics used the word "sagar" for such a large water body rather than the idea of tide bay of Bengal reaching that far
@@krillin3350 aryan invasion ? Sorry this aryan invasion is a theory and is not accepted any more. There is no sign of invasion is found be it written or archaeological. Give one ancient source where it is written that Aryan came from outside. There is no mention in sangam literature too who claim themselves as Dravida. There is word ‘Arya’ means noble person and ‘Dravida’ is referred as a particular area in bharat. And mlecha means Outsiders who dont follow dharma. Don’t read communist sponsored History written by neo communists. Always ask them for contemporary sources.
@@krillin3350 no sorry it has nothing to do with Europe. These are all theories coined by britishers . No contemporary sources and no archaeological evidence. Yes we have migrated from Bharat to other parts of the world at some point. Read ‘Ashtadhyayi’ of Panini you will get to know the roots of sanskrit. And I don’t understand why people are still believing in this theory after the discovery of Rakhigari and Sinauli. You can say Bangla is a so called indo european language because the Bangla language we hear today is a corrupt version. In bangla language there are lots of Portuguese words Like ‘Janala’ means window and in Portuguese its janela.
Kindly try not to use the word Mlechcha. It sounds derogatory. Also I want to ask you about the origin of the Great Barman dynasty. Was it Indo aryan or was it Indo Mongoloid ? Thank you for describing Assam History and my ancestors so beautifully. You made a good effort to link Assam History with contemporary Bharat. Hope to see more on the entire NE in future . Thank you
Assam as region had many kingdoms - Pragjyotisha Kingdom , Kapili -Dabaka Kingdom , Duborini Kingdom. Pragjyotisha expanded during the Bhauma-Varama regime. So Assam was not mere Pragjyotisha-Kamrupa kingdom
Going into the history of India one realises how old the Bengal - Assam tension is, it is not something which just happened due to partition in 1947 or because of the British before that.
@@parjanyashukla176 UP MP Bihar were politically dominant by extinguishing Bengal, just as they r now... Once Bengal seceeded, Dominance was gone... Bengal began dominating UP, MP Bihar after it seceeded until Ghaznavis invaded.
Bengal Assam tension from around 12th century when Mongol Expansion pushed several tibeto burman, tai groups from East Asia in the region.. That is the era since when Ahoms arrived, Khasis arrived, Bhutias arrived... and Ahoms eventually were culturally dominated and influenced by Bengalies and even mixed with them like many others to the extent that their names, rituals, festivals, food habits, language many things had bengali influence... Which they began to ironically also loath and be insecure of and continue to be.... UP, MP Bihar wouldnt have made much relevance even if by some miracle they remianed politically dominant.
Hi Jay, been a long time since I’ve commented but I’m still here. Great vid which sheds light on the history of ancient Assam. I’ve seen your podcasts and videos on mlecchas too. I can see the challenges scholars face in dating Indian history from the sources. Could you please share your opinions on when Assam (Kamarupa/Prag) and also Bengal/Bihar and perhaps Odisha (somatata, Anga, Kalinga , Pundra, Sinhal, Vanga etc) was first visited by Vedic Indo Aryans and also when the territories were no longer mleccha territories but part of Aryavarta? Thanks
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl sorry this comment is lacking in knowledge and sources. Aryan is an Indo Iranian term which was used in Persia and North India. You said it was bogus then said it was Ancient Sanskrit so you need to pick a lane. If you call me a kid then I can only say look in the mirror stubborn crusty boomer
Also 16th century Yogini Tantra can not be regarded as credible source for periods that were 1600 years ago before the text was written. So, it is better to use the epigraphs.
Wtf..they weren't burmese😂. And there is no ancient relation between burma n assam. Literally Burmese came to india by Invasion of assam in 19 Century by defeating ahom ruler. Burmese ruled for only 4 years period. Before 19 Century there was no relation between between burma and assam nor of the population
@@PHOENIX-ff5flbut they may have traded things because remember Burma has ancinet kingdoms dating back to even far before the time of Buddha. Did Burmese were one of many peoples migrated from Assam remember Bhramaputra river and Bhrama (Burmese/Bamar) are quite similar
Rivers, floods, rituals & linguistics jargons something different then war prides and genealogies for the peeps, minimal from elitist historiography least they wrote for future netizens, may be.
The real indigenous people of the land today known as Assam are the Kirats. The Kirat King Ghatak was dethroned by Narak with the help of Vishnu (God). Ethnicities like Koch , Rabha , Garo etc are the descendants of Kirat race.
Indian historians post 1947 have tried to paint Assam as succesor of Kamrup, because the actual KAMRUP became East Pakistan, and now it Bangladesh... Anyone can search the ancinet scriptures and references of cities of Kamrup and they were all cities like SriHatta(Sylhett), Mymensingh etc. 😀 Kamrup is East Bengal, not Assam. The identity of Assam is not older than 300 years old... Assamese isnt even an ethnicity. Initially it was a band of people against Bengalies...It included, Naga, Garo, khasi, Bodo, Ahom, Jaintiya and even Bengali muslims (miyas) in 20th century...Once Assam was formed these, several groups divided and then began to establish their own consolidated areas : Khasis made Meghalaya, Nagas made Nagaland. Now Garos and Bodos r demanding secession. There was never any region called Assam in ancient history...Mongoloid Tibeto Burmans, Tai etc started arriving there since 13th century and claiming lands of original natives who had more in common with the present day Bengalies than anyone else.... The racial aggression and push back of Bengalies in North East is from that era.
The identity of Assamese people is very confusing to even me as in Bengali language we call them as 'Ahomiya' while most Assamese people aren't even Ahoms and also speak an Indo-European language which is very closely related to Bengali and Odia.
@@01Crown have u heard of the parsi community of Gujrat who migrated from Iran to gujrat? Now those parsis speak gujrati language not their native language avestan. So wont u call them gujratis now instead of Avestanians? Same goes for Ahoms? Only difference is parsis didnt have a political kingdom but ahoms had. Thats why people calls Kamrupi people as Axomiya since Ahom had major rule over the landscape of Assam.
Are you kidding? Nearly all of the inscriptions of Kamarupa were issued from present day Assam. The capital of Kamarupa are Guwahati (Pragjyotishpura, Kamarupanagara) and Tezpur (Harupeshwara) and most of the places mentioned in the inscriptions are also in Assam. Assam has continuously been known as Kamarupa, but in outside and in Assam.
@@adithyaadi1363 I don't think we should take the literal meaning of itihasa. Every story starts with “once upon a time " that doesn't mean that it happened some time ago in the past
Any mythological story from any religion can give us cultural background of a region but no mythological stories can be a true history. Even Bible too . Indian Epic stories so enrooted in d Indian psychi that nobody can oppose it. But true historian & honest scholars from any branch knowledge accept Epic stories from Hindu,muslim , Christians Greek Zorastrian.......take them as true history. Even Socalled scientific history should be bound to periodical review. It can also chage as it gets new evidences.
Amazing.I am from Assam and for the first time I have watched somebody covering the ancient Assam history so nicely. I have read Edward Gait and Padmanath Gohainbarua's book on history of Assam.But some of the facts I came to know from you.Waiting for more videos on Assam brother.
Please make video on explaining various ancient Indian arts like madhura, gandhara, mouryan, Gupta, satavahana etc
Thank you again. Every one of your video reveals a great deal of insight into Indian History
Sir can you make videos on ancient indian military strategy, food, clothing and other day to day matters they faced. Also what is a good book I can read to start learning about Indian history?
You have done a lot of work.
Very nice video, could you possibly make something on Kalachuris of Dakshin Koshala?
Sir please make a video on medieval and ancient Indian weapons , and martial arts .
Please make more videos on ancient history of Assam Bengal Odisha Jharkhand r Bihar
Assam was established by Bhaumasura of Naraka dynastry who moved out of Mithila. The Indo-Aryans in Assam have either Maithil or Kanyakubja ancestry.
Source? I'm maithili and would like to know more.
Although to use the word maithili is incorrect imo. It's like saying present day humans have African ancestry. Technically true, but can be misinterpreted. We are not the descendants of those who live in Africa rn
@@randomturd1415Narakasura himself was son of Raja Janak, Sita's father and Naraka too was born of Bhoomidevi like Sita. That makes him Sita's brother.
Baro-Bhuyan kayasthas of Assam were from Kannauj too.
I'm myself an Assamese Kayastha. People with surnames like kalitas, Bharalis and Bhuyans are assamese baro Bhuyan kayasthas
Mahapurush Srimanta Shankardev, the Vaishnavite polymath of Medieval Assam was a baro Bhuyan kayastha.
@@Oskar_Von_Reuenthal_1how can we believe you ??
When you literally said rajputs have Hun ancestry? Are you mocking them?
And srimonto sonkorodevo is not from that caste specifically
It's quite rare seeing a kayastha being proud of his caste
The majority of us are elite wokeist. @@Oskar_Von_Reuenthal_1
Thank you Sir l keep updating more on it l
Kamrup kingdom fase formed by Dimasa Naraka Dynasty in 835ad in prajyotispur
Jay Vardhan Sir I am a great fan of yours. I have been watching your videos since last year as I am interested in Ancient Indian History and will be studying higher courses in History belonging to this era. Sir I am from West Bengal and hence I am really curious to know the ancient history of Bengal since the region was Mahajanapada/Janapada called Anga. You know there is an archeological sight called Chandraketugarh situated in the district of North24Parganas which historians and archeologists believe to be even older than the Mauryan Period and the ancient discovered city is mysterious like Harappa as no inscriptions or reference of any king was found. However being so ancient hundreds of beautiful terracotta carvings, sculptures and other drawn data depicting the life lived by people in that city has been minutely detailed. Sir as a curious student it is my earnest request if you could please research about the Chandraketugarh Sight as no one really talks about it.. Many even believe that the chronicle related to Ganga Rhidoy Warriors of which Alexander feared might be the people of Ancient Bengal and Chandraketugarh might be linked to it. Sir it will be a Great Honour of you kindly accept my request. Thankyou Sir.
Excellent. Thanks
Low lying parts are called @ 03:57 ?
Haor. Eastern part of Mymensingh and South western part of Sylhet has low lying waterbodies
What do you think about the shungas before pushyamitra?
Were the shungas hereditary generals of the mauryas ?
And who was gopāla shunga ?
shungas were outside of India
@@venchingfuthey were the residents of patliputra, they were brahmins and they were aryas how more Indians they could be?
@@aavcorp.developerseng.3453 bro that guy is a bhimta😂 for them anything that they dont like they will term them as outside indian
@@venchingfuchup bhimte😂😂 they were indians😂
@@aavcorp.developerseng.3453 Bromins are from central russia, you can check their habits, their rigid rituals and customs, none of them belong to India. That is why they use different vessels for different caste, they want their group to remain distinct
Good work sir
Make video about symbols of punch marked coins
Who was Su Kha Pha ???
Sir can you make video on oldest surviving evidence of sanatana Dharma like incription in Middle East issue by mittani Kingdom king who wrote Vedic god and it's 1500 bce old
Haors have nothing to do with sea. We name even big lakes as sagar, for example ramsagar lake in Dinajpur district.
So, imo it makes more sense that the kings used to live by the side of a haor which are abundant in sylhet area, and the authors of the epics used the word "sagar" for such a large water body rather than the idea of tide bay of Bengal reaching that far
According to sanskrit 'mleccha' is a term used for invaders or foreigners or foreign barbarians like sakas,Huns,Chinese,Greeks
Mlechha is term originated from "meluhha" used by invading aryans for indigenous indians... Later they begun using this terms for later invaders.
@@krillin3350 aryan invasion ?
Sorry this aryan invasion is a theory and is not accepted any more.
There is no sign of invasion is found be it written or archaeological.
Give one ancient source where it is written that Aryan came from outside.
There is no mention in sangam literature too who claim themselves as Dravida.
There is word ‘Arya’ means noble person and ‘Dravida’ is referred as a particular area in bharat.
And mlecha means Outsiders who dont follow dharma.
Don’t read communist sponsored History written by neo communists.
Always ask them for contemporary sources.
@@Hyper21111 is sanskrit an Indo-European language or not?
How do you think languages spread from one place to another?
@@krillin3350 no sorry it has nothing to do with Europe.
These are all theories coined by britishers .
No contemporary sources and no archaeological evidence.
Yes we have migrated from Bharat to other parts of the world at some point.
Read ‘Ashtadhyayi’ of Panini you will get to know the roots of sanskrit.
And I don’t understand why people are still believing in this theory after the discovery of Rakhigari and Sinauli.
You can say Bangla is a so called indo european language because the Bangla language we hear today is a corrupt version.
In bangla language there are lots of Portuguese words Like ‘Janala’ means window and in Portuguese its janela.
@@krillin3350Well, you don't need to "invade" someone for them to adopt your language.
V knowledgeable video
Kindly try not to use the word Mlechcha. It sounds derogatory. Also I want to ask you about the origin of the Great Barman dynasty. Was it Indo aryan or was it Indo Mongoloid ? Thank you for describing Assam History and my ancestors so beautifully. You made a good effort to link Assam History with contemporary Bharat. Hope to see more on the entire NE in future . Thank you
Assam as region had many kingdoms - Pragjyotisha Kingdom , Kapili -Dabaka Kingdom , Duborini Kingdom.
Pragjyotisha expanded during the Bhauma-Varama regime.
So Assam was not mere Pragjyotisha-Kamrupa kingdom
He has not talking merely about kingdoms here, but the cultural region (with diffuse boundaries).
If I were the Prime minister of India, i would have given you the award for best history channel
Going into the history of India one realises how old the Bengal - Assam tension is, it is not something which just happened due to partition in 1947 or because of the British before that.
everything was good when guptas were ruling that region
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl
Yes, basically until UP-MP-Bihar were politically dominant.
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl If everything was good in Gupta era there wouldnt arise any reason for secession by Shashank. 😀
@@parjanyashukla176 UP MP Bihar were politically dominant by extinguishing Bengal, just as they r now... Once Bengal seceeded, Dominance was gone... Bengal began dominating UP, MP Bihar after it seceeded until Ghaznavis invaded.
Bengal Assam tension from around 12th century when Mongol Expansion pushed several tibeto burman, tai groups from East Asia in the region.. That is the era since when Ahoms arrived, Khasis arrived, Bhutias arrived... and Ahoms eventually were culturally dominated and influenced by Bengalies and even mixed with them like many others to the extent that their names, rituals, festivals, food habits, language many things had bengali influence... Which they began to ironically also loath and be insecure of and continue to be.... UP, MP Bihar wouldnt have made much relevance even if by some miracle they remianed politically dominant.
Was the river shift in the Brahmaputra accounted for in this map?
Bhagadattas elephant in Mbh war was legendory....it created havoc in pandav army to such a kevel that Arjuna has to come to kill it and bhagadatta
as nice as previous episodes
Sir bring more topics related to Axom history 😊
Galti se likhe hai ki Axom hi bolte hai aap log
@@Arpit_Naresh_123 hum log apne bhasa mei axom bolte hai..
@@Arpit_Naresh_123 in Assamese its Axom..in English-Assam
Batane ke liye thank you
Check odd compass video
Hi Jay, been a long time since I’ve commented but I’m still here.
Great vid which sheds light on the history of ancient Assam. I’ve seen your podcasts and videos on mlecchas too. I can see the challenges scholars face in dating Indian history from the sources.
Could you please share your opinions on when Assam (Kamarupa/Prag) and also Bengal/Bihar and perhaps Odisha (somatata, Anga, Kalinga , Pundra, Sinhal, Vanga etc) was first visited by Vedic Indo Aryans and also when the territories were no longer mleccha territories but part of Aryavarta? Thanks
aryan is a bogus term
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl no it’s not sorry. IDC about your hindutva bs
Grow up kid...read some books 🤣...Aryan is a sanskrit word
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl very silly. Clearly have no clue about real history, just whatsapp history🫢
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl sorry this comment is lacking in knowledge and sources. Aryan is an Indo Iranian term which was used in Persia and North India. You said it was bogus then said it was Ancient Sanskrit so you need to pick a lane.
If you call me a kid then I can only say look in the mirror stubborn crusty boomer
Also 16th century Yogini Tantra can not be regarded as credible source for periods that were 1600 years ago before the text was written. So, it is better to use the epigraphs.
Nice
A series on Kashmir would be appreciated..
stone pelter and minority killers...
What will do by knowing that land's history!
Were Burmese from Tibiet but went to Assam for a while then migrated to Burma their names are simaular to Varman
Wtf..they weren't burmese😂. And there is no ancient relation between burma n assam. Literally Burmese came to india by Invasion of assam in 19 Century by defeating ahom ruler. Burmese ruled for only 4 years period. Before 19 Century there was no relation between between burma and assam nor of the population
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl
You are correct.
"Burman" is the same as "Varman", it has no connection with Burma which is just a British mutilation of "Brahma".
@@parjanyashukla176Did ancient Pyu people of Burma have some connections with Assam ?
@@PHOENIX-ff5flbut they may have traded things because remember Burma has ancinet kingdoms dating back to even far before the time of Buddha. Did Burmese were one of many peoples migrated from Assam remember Bhramaputra river and Bhrama (Burmese/Bamar) are quite similar
Rivers, floods, rituals & linguistics jargons something different then war prides and genealogies for the peeps, minimal from elitist historiography least they wrote for future netizens, may be.
Do Telugu history!! ❤
And of the Gonds. The tribals deserve their story to be told!
Namaskara bhai
ancient Assam connection to ancient Burma
Does the word Bengal have Austro asiatic roots ?
It's anglicization of the ancient sanskrit name Vanga.
@@VikashTiwari-s6c rather the Persian pronunciation, since Bengal has been from the very first sultanate
Mostly
@@randomturd1415 Wikipedia says the word "banga" comes from Austric word vengo.
@@benefactor4309wrong , it's evolved from the Sanskrit ancient name of the region , vanga.
❤❤
👍
Here comes the most interesting history mini you tube update 😂
The real indigenous people of the land today known as Assam are the Kirats. The Kirat King Ghatak was dethroned by Narak with the help of Vishnu (God). Ethnicities like Koch , Rabha , Garo etc are the descendants of Kirat race.
theres no so called indigenous people
@@PHOENIX-ff5fl Of course there is. You're an outsider you'll deny for sure.
@@TheThinker792 balor outsider.. tohotor tribal burok indigenous bonuwa ru non tribal axomiya burok bahiror pora oha kuwa propaganda buji napaw buli bhabo nki
Please make a video on the process of Ashwamedha Yagya
bro have you tried for UPSC?
Indian historians post 1947 have tried to paint Assam as succesor of Kamrup, because the actual KAMRUP became East Pakistan, and now it Bangladesh... Anyone can search the ancinet scriptures and references of cities of Kamrup and they were all cities like SriHatta(Sylhett), Mymensingh etc. 😀 Kamrup is East Bengal, not Assam. The identity of Assam is not older than 300 years old... Assamese isnt even an ethnicity. Initially it was a band of people against Bengalies...It included, Naga, Garo, khasi, Bodo, Ahom, Jaintiya and even Bengali muslims (miyas) in 20th century...Once Assam was formed these, several groups divided and then began to establish their own consolidated areas : Khasis made Meghalaya, Nagas made Nagaland. Now Garos and Bodos r demanding secession.
There was never any region called Assam in ancient history...Mongoloid Tibeto Burmans, Tai etc started arriving there since 13th century and claiming lands of original natives who had more in common with the present day Bengalies than anyone else.... The racial aggression and push back of Bengalies in North East is from that era.
The identity of Assamese people is very confusing to even me as in Bengali language we call them as 'Ahomiya' while most Assamese people aren't even Ahoms and also speak an Indo-European language which is very closely related to Bengali and Odia.
And not only the language but their culture, diet, lifestyle and dressing is also very similar to Bengalis.
@@Ulfaa.Assam_warrior. What do you mean by that? Obviously it's a fact to be proud of that the region of Kamrup wasn't conquered by the Muslims, no?
@@01Crown have u heard of the parsi community of Gujrat who migrated from Iran to gujrat? Now those parsis speak gujrati language not their native language avestan. So wont u call them gujratis now instead of Avestanians? Same goes for Ahoms? Only difference is parsis didnt have a political kingdom but ahoms had. Thats why people calls Kamrupi people as Axomiya since Ahom had major rule over the landscape of Assam.
Are you kidding? Nearly all of the inscriptions of Kamarupa were issued from present day Assam. The capital of Kamarupa are Guwahati (Pragjyotishpura, Kamarupanagara) and Tezpur (Harupeshwara) and most of the places mentioned in the inscriptions are also in Assam. Assam has continuously been known as Kamarupa, but in outside and in Assam.
Can i ask why are u using mahabharat to know the history of some places . Isn't it just an epic
😂😂😂 fool, this is not an epic its oir history.. your believe system will not change the fact, cope harder
No they are itihasa which means that is how it happened. It helps knowing about the history and governance of those times just like how he used here.
@@adithyaadi1363 I don't think we should take the literal meaning of itihasa. Every story starts with “once upon a time " that doesn't mean that it happened some time ago in the past
@@bhupeshyoutuber5578 it's not. Now shut up.
Any mythological story from any religion can give us cultural background of a region but no mythological stories can be a true history.
Even Bible too .
Indian Epic stories so enrooted in d Indian psychi that nobody can oppose it.
But true historian & honest scholars from any branch knowledge accept Epic stories from Hindu,muslim , Christians Greek Zorastrian.......take them as true history.
Even Socalled scientific history should be bound to periodical review.
It can also chage as it gets new evidences.
Biased HISTORIANS all over the world
So jay is a descendant of harsh vardhan 😂😂