Exchange between Sen. Harris and Judge Kavanaugh on Mueller Investigation (C-SPAN)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 сен 2018
- Senator Kamala Harris asks if Judge Kavanaugh has discussed Mueller Investigation with anyone at Kasowitz Benson Torres law firm.
Kavanaugh: "I would like to know the person you're thinking of."
Sen. Harris: "I think you're thinking of someone and you don't want to tell us."
Full video here: cs.pn/2wHnhxZ
Discover the C-SPAN Video Library at www.c-span.org/quickguide/
Download our App www.c-span.org/special/?radioapp
C-SPAN: Created by Cable in 1979. Offered as a public service.
Subscribe to our RUclips channel: / cspan
Follow us:
Facebook: / cspan
Twitter: / cspan
Instagram: / cspan
Subscribe:
C-SPAN Podcasts: www.c-span.org/podcasts/
Newsletters: www.c-span.org/connect/
#cspan
Ladies and gentlemen, the people running the country.
and the next Vice President. And, then President.
@@glennemeroff4922 yang will be the next president unless biden dies in office
@SGT. York that was unnecessary
Glen Nemeroff - it would be nice if Californians spent this much time holding her (our Senator) accountable for the mess this state is in. And it would also be nice if she spent this much energy actually delivering for our state!
Biden and Harris are corrupt
Who is here after Kamala Harris was announced as Joe Biden’s VP pick?
Me lol
Anybody who wants to see how she really is
Yep, that lady is crazy just like Joe "racist" Biden
@@alphaandomega7957 AND A DESCENDANT OF A SLAVE OWNER!!!!
Me
Hello, Mrs Harris...
We meet again...
This time I shall show no mercy.
Clarence Thomas: We meet again Mr Biden 😂😂
Trump 🇺🇲 2020 the sequel
@@postal1468 You couldn't write a better script.
BROVO & that's Both in English & In GREEK !
I TOTALLY forgot until I did a little refresher tonight.. that Kamala was the one who produced that letter from the anonymous woman claiming to have been ‘gang-raped’ by Kavanugh and others in the backseat of a car, too! It was Kamala who turned the letter over to the Senate judiciary committee, hahaha! Then, she later wanted impeachment inquiries opened against him.
Holy hell.. I hope her participation in that sham comes back to bite her. And while I think Kavanaugh is probably a very respectable man and judge.. he must despise that woman with a passion.
"Here we are again old friend. This time I will be asking the questions."
And yet questions were asked... and yet brett and the rest of the court validate president elect Bidens win. HES STILL YOUR PRESIDENT! Ahhhhhh it's so much fun to troll the conservatives
cringe
@WilshirecityBlues country's already ruined luv
@@NAVYVICK who said I'm conservative? Have fun in your binary world.
@@williamhad how dare you assume my gender lol
Have fun watching the end of the GOP
The toughest job in the world is trying to get a politician or judge to answer a yes or no question
The hardest part is being asked a question that makes sense.
Kamala is the woman for the job
She wasnt specific in any sort of way. How is he suppose to know who works for that law firm. She could of started stating names etc but no lol. The question from a logical point of view made no sense.
I thought fishing in the Bering sea for crabs was pretty tough but civil discourse is pretty rough I guess what with all the AC and water and comfy chairs
scribd It was a specific law firm. Had she given a specific name and that’s not who he spoke with, he would’ve said no. She left It open ended, purposely, to allow him to name who he spoke with. Obviously he’s spoken with people, if he hadn’t he would’ve blatantly said no.
-..What's the most you've ever lost on a coin toss?
-Sir?
-The most. You ever lost. On a coin toss.
-I don't know. I couldn't say.
💖😎💖
I certainly could not answer that question if someone asked me.
Okay, but she asked yes/no questions about whether or not he had ever spoken to anyone at an entire law firm about a highly relevant case. I'm an epileptic with consequently HORRIBLE memory, and I could have easily answered questions of this nature. She is literally doing her job, and doing it well. It's so absurd that she could be viewed as the bad guy in this video at all. People are really grasping at straws to make her look bad. I hope that's a good sign for her political future.
Okay...the "coin toss" quotes are from No Country For Old Men. It's a book/movie reference. When you're asked (particularly in the movie) "what's the most you've ever lost on a coin toss," and ya can't answer the question, dude literally flips a coin, and lets the coin "decide" your fate (whether or not he's gonna kill you). The guy in the movie scene was a bumbling, scared lil idiot as well. So, this guy would most likely be royally screwed if she asked him the "coin toss" question, because he absolutely cannot give a simple "yes/no" answer. Great book and movie, by the way!
@@kelseyn7721 but I'm not critizicing her. It's just dialogue taken from No country for old men of a scene where a store owner struggles to answer Bardem's questions and feels uncomfortable. If you haven't, watch the movie because it's really cool. I see how my comment can be misinterpreted. Actually I think she did a good job.
...I struggled with epilepsy too, cheers
7:54 "Clearly you're not gonna answer the question"
Hmm... It reminds me of a certain VP candidate and a question about court-packing...
"Im glad your brought that up, im about to answer that question...(continues to not answer question and try stirring up a race issue) then continuously proves she is no person to be given power to.
Biden should pack the court especially as the Republicans keep stacking it.
@@trolljones4386 lol stacking it? Its basically 5-4
@@beaminup funny that the left changed the votes required for supreme court justice and now look at them. Also 4 years ago they were saying that the scotus seat should be filled and now they dont like it
Brace yourself. They’re going to win and they’re going to pack the court. Deal with it.
I totally forgot how crazy this whole thing was. When the ladies started yelling from the back and being pushed out by security... damn
Ladies?? they must have redefined that word too
@@billjones424 no one gaf
@@cheezeit5353 ??
Yeah almost as crazy as nominating a sexual predator with questionable credentials to the Supreme Court
Did you talk to anyone in this house!!?
"Who's in the house?"
ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!
😭😭😂😂😂
@Carlos Ochoa lol why? Do you defend that kind of questioning?
@Carlos Ochoa Left showing their true colors. Well done.
Carlos Ochoa don’t be mad, Karen.
Spicy - you missed the point - she knows about the conversation. She wants to see him squirm not to purgor himself 😉
Eagerly waiting for debate- between Harris & Mike Pence
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 your not alone
Yea its going to be brutal, Kamala is going to come off as a mean prosecutor like and soft spoken Pence will look like the victim of a obviously spiteful unstable person. It will clearly benefit Pence a ton!
Popcorn Party!
Eagerly waiting for debate between Trump and Biden
“Mother, do you think they'll try to break my balls?”
~Pink Floyd
She wasted so much time on a useless question
@benjianubis lmao. What does insulting him do to change his mind? I swear people think politics make up for intelligence.
@benjianubis my “nonsense” statement would mean you have to come to terms with the fact you’re not smart for holding a certain opinion, so of course you’re going to respond like that. Same way OP isn’t stupid for holding a certain opinion either. It is literally how you perceive the situation and yet you have the audacity to say some can perceive something wrong. Your line of thinking absolutely murders diversity of thought and makes intelligence partisan. “If YOu DOnT AgRee WiTh mE YoUrE StUPiD” nice one dude.
@Jacqueline McBride roasted.
@benjianubis i like how you think im lying to you when I said that someone holding a certain opinion has nothing to do with intelligence and everything to do with perception. Also. If you’re going to criticize grammar, is there a word, “thay” in the dictionary my man? Do you decide your opinions based on what “smart people” say? No, you base your opinions on your interpretations of scenarios in politics. That’s fine, but don’t criticize others for coming to a different conclusion than you. Rather, you should criticize the process they used to come to that conclusion.
@Jacqueline McBride appreciate it my man
And what exactly was the point of this line of reasoning? She obviously didn't have a specific name to trap him with.
Sen. Harris was attempting to trap Kav into saying "no", and then she would bring up a person associated with the firm (however minimally) that may have spoken to him. Then she would accuse him of lying. Sen, Lee saw this trap immediately, and that's why he objected into her time to alert the committee as to the trap question that it was. Good for Kav, bad for Harris.
This is when I was first introduced to the Old Bag......what an inept and failed attempt to trip up Kavanaugh.......she's awful.
She figured he was dumber than she was
And what is up with it's a yes or no? She's sickening.
@@mistybarr1761 I don't think you ever sat on a jury or listened to a cross examination if you think asking a simple yes or no question is "sickening"... fragile much?
I hate these people who randomly yell out during a formal hearing
it makes me like their side less
its not brave, its annoying
Yeah exactly. So annoying and idiotic
Make it illegal actually. They wouldn’t let right wingers be this rude. We’d be locked up and starved to death. The hearing room is not a free speech zone.
Kamala was smirking because she knew they were going to yell out.
True but also the guy who interrupted Kamala, each person gets 5 minutes I believe and every second matters, they should turn off everyone else’s mic
That's because they are plants for the democratic party.
When he starts talking about rabbits the guy behind him loses it. 🤣🤣
Lol I wish they made an snl skit for this.
Lol I’m watching over again just to see it.
@ What?!
Ronyfcb Farfan umm it is all a script it was. SNL🤣
Scummy, nonces, liars ahh😭😭
A better description would be like rats or leeches
Allow me to sum this up. Kamala’s question is unanswerable without more context.
There are over 250 attorneys employed at that law firm. To be able to answer the question, justice kavanaugh would need to know every single one of the 250 attorneys and recall if he talked to them about Robert mueller. He would also have to know if they worked at that law firm.
If Kamala simply gave a list of important names, he could have likely answered the question.
Not true. This is implying that he’s had conversations with strangers about the investigation. If you’re speaking with someone, you most likely know who they are. Who discusses pressing current events with strangers? His demand for a list is just redirecting the conversation because he was too afraid to answer.
@@wisteria6599 A good judge cannot make suppositions. Your point is fair enough, but you assume that he knew for a certain fact that a person has worked at said lawfirm. A good judge cannot make assumptions, thus he made the fair point of asking for a list of names or a name so he can accurately answer the question without making said assumption
She was asking an impossible question to answer and then make it seem like he was hiding something. Just another beyond disgusting technique and has nothing tk do with truthseeking. It was all political. Kamala Harris is such a disgusting person. She's really pushed me toward the republican party.
She thought she did something. Brett moved on and she’s been exposed for other things
I think he answered it perfectly. This is not an interrogation. You want a specific answer? Give me a specific question. As in “did you ideal to Jon smith who works for this specific law firm about the mueller investigation?” Yes or no. “
It’s crazy now I rewatch this video, and then watch the current ACB hearing, and see how these senators talk to these judges. You have a lawmaker who can’t even tell the truth about something they’ve said or co-signed trying to grill someone who can quote the law from memory.
Neither of your statement are true here
I cannot stand Kamala...she us an embarrassment to all women!
💯💯💯Exactly. Put Kamala in a 5 minute interview and all she would do is laugh and deny to answer any question about anything, ever.
@@lynnecantrell8877 she does not embarrass me that’s for sure :)
@@lynnecantrell8877 so are you
Should have asked if he knows anybody at that law firm, gotten a yes, and then asked if he has spoken with them about the investigation.
Exactly, she is brainless. And the guy was terrified of being caught lying.
I actually don’t think he told anyone in that firm “on purpose ” , he might have told other people who could potentially be related to the firm and he dosnt know it, if thats the case and he answerd no then he would be lying , so i dont blame him for giving the answer he gave
@@sourstrawberry6636 I mean, unless he’s going around talking about the mueller investigation to anyone he meets on the street and never interacts with again, I’d find it hard to believe that he doesn’t know at least some information on whoever he’s discussing the investigation with, and given the context under which that conversation would reasonably occur, he’d probably know whether or not that person is affiliated with that particular firm.
He would have said no because the law firm was the center of the investigation. Why would he say yes? He is a judge he can’t anticipate the traps as well🤦🏽♀️
Adam K, It's not that simple. He would have said, "I don't know, I can't remember." The same runaround he's giving her now.
She incessantly insinuates Judge Kavanaugh is an idiot. Emasculating a man seems to be her forte'! Despicable behavior for a real lady.
in the US, how do psychiatrists and psychologists figure out someone is crazy? Do they change the standards so that people don't realize more than half the country is insane?
Ygor Nimoy hahaha
Half? 😂 more
We use objective evaluations in comparison towards reality. Social norms change, so "crazy" and measuring it can be difficult, which is why reality covers a broad spectrum.
I can give an example if you need it.
@@WilsonsKennel i need. Can u pls specify
lmaoo i came here for the comments too
3:28 guy cracking up at "law firms breeding like rabbits" 🤣
Yeah, watch him pick his teeth and eat what he pulled out.
Who is that😂
A republican. We're all normal people, these democrats are fucking insane tho
@@Quesque_que yeah I've noticed republicans tend to be a lot more pragmatic. Speaking from a foreigner. The democrats seem to want all the authority of men, the privileges of women, and the accountability of children.
@@satoshinakamoto7253 Exactly. Couldn't have put it any better
Who let the clowns in?
Who let the dogs _out_ ?
.
Who's here to see how the presidential candidate acted during this hearing ?
Yes, I said president, not VP.
You mean the VP candida.... Oh....😏
Absolutely she is horrible!
Yep she killed this little wimp 😂
She merked this cheese dick bastard 😂
Yes, and I'm very impressed. Trump says she treated him horribly. Really? He's a lawyer and she's a lawyer. I'm sure he's questioned many witnesses similarly during his career. She was strong, kept her cool and her question was reasonable. He, on the other hand, came off as weak and definitely hedging over giving an answer.
the reason he keeps repeating her question is because they will always twist your answer
It would be so so sweet if Kavanaugh were to have a say in the outcome of the 2020 election.
And clarence thomas for Biden trying to stop his appointment. Karma is great.
Good look with that. 4 million votes up and counting ;) He likes beer though, apparently.
@@natasharenston3675 he likes Trump too.
Check mate!
have you no idea of what democracy is? what america has founded itself upon?
She loves to pull he 'yes or no' without facts.
She’s been caught my pence and tulsi she really isn’t anything special
I mean he could just say no, it’s not about facts that what questions are for
It was a simple question!
it was a very direct question though, lol.
She’s a disgrace !!!!
Quackafornia at its bestest !!😩
It turns out that this whole conversation was a waste of time!
@Toori Baba suicide ain't the way son
Because he's playing dumb, the only one to get it out of the bastard to hold a gun to his head.
@@garroshsucks12_ Kamala got owned, get over it
@@milostodorovic69 What? I don't even like her lol. She didn't get owned either he just refused to answer the question.
@@garroshsucks12_ this is a waste of time. He is innocent whether you like it or not
He looks like a high school student who just got caught plagiarizing a paper.
What makes you say that ?!
😂😂😂😂
he’s in BS mode
Boy you must be dumb as shit. She didn't ask a single question that had any effect except making her look like a pure idiot. She is trying to force a lie or make it look like she has info that she clearly doesn't. When you comment shit like this all it does is publicly state " I am an idiot. I have no clue how anything works. I shouldn't be allowed to vote."
😂😭
Like or hate her policies. You can’t deny how unlikeable she is as a person. Listening to her in these settings just makes me mad. Look at the way she even spoke at the primaries with people that agree with her. How did she convince people to elect her for anything
I think she's very likeable and pretty damn smart. Don't tell people what they can or cannot do.
@@Marvelerence Have you heard her rallies? It’s silent. She insinuated the person she’s running WITH who got her to where she is a racist and sexual assaulter and when asked about it later she awkwardly laughed and said it was a debate insinuating you can just accuse people of terrible acts as long as it’s to get yourself elected. It’s not a secret she doesn’t have many democratic friends in the senate and just looking at her primary polls the democratic voters werent very fond of her either. So you may like her, but sadly you and a handful of other Americans aren’t enough to deem a candidate likable.
@@Marvelerence I guess you think that you are very likeable aswell. Lol
This man is a rapist and you’re worried about being liked? He’s making decisions on morality please sit down
@jamescliff8038
Why tf is Kamala Harris in public service? She should be in high school, her mannerisms are so childish.
Are you dumb or stupid?
I agree, kamala harris is weird
@@zeynablastname294 that’s a question for Kama
@@oscarsantos2240 That's a question for the people that don't know whats going on in this video
True . . . . She's behaving as if she's arguing with her girlfriends.
3:16 "They are constantly metastasizing...they are like rabbits, they spawn new firms." And the guy behind him just lost it XD
Amazing 😂😂 this whole hearing is so ridiculous it’s almost surreal
I’m sure he was still laughing about the protester... nice try
Omg you right hahaha
If you watch long enough he eventually fishes a piece of food or something out of his mouth, then re-eats it. Gangsta.
littlecloudflower my favorite moment in this video !
This is the kind of questions the president would be forced to answer under oath if Bob Mueller is allowed to depose the president.
TheBelegur exactly. There need to be laws preventing politically motivated abuse of prosecutorial power. Bob Mueller is in effect a 4th branch of government without checks and balances. Who oversees the oversight?
Jacob Bumpass as an independent, it's really hard to give the democrats any objective consideration when they behave like petulant children. I feel forced to vote along party lines for the first time in my life just to protect the president from what is a very politically motivated assault on our nations single highest office.
I have a huge problem Kamala Harris continue to call migrants, immigrants. Immigrants are citizens of a country that migrated from another country. Kamala Harris and other are suggesting that the migrants that come from Mexico are any other country all already citizens of the United States before they get here. That really needs to be looked at why the liberals democrats and tv media keeps calling migrants, immigrants. Europe calls them migrants which is correct. Kamala Harris didn't win in California, the poles where rigged. That also needs to be looked at Kamala Harris win in California.
SuperCorrector1
how rich is it that republicans are complaining about democratic impediment? Have we all forgotten about mcconnell's impediments to obama's nomination which lasted for about 293 days? This record will never be broken by the democrats.
you have no leg to stand on.
how is a draft dodger a hero? lol
Here’s what he meant:
“I’ve talked to some of my colleagues about this issue, since it’s on the news everyday. I don’t know if any of them work at the law firm you mentioned. So if you would give me a list of names, I’d be happy to tell you if I’ve talked to any of them about it.”
well said
Wow, it's almost as if you speak english and Kamala speaks Japanese. You're brilliant
@@bregonwebb8921 no democrats speak stupid
Wrong! She trying to expose him for helping Donald trump by feeding his lawyers helpful info for his defense and promise to save his ass if impeachment is brought upon him in exchange for the nomination. It’s pay to play, favor for a favor.
Brett is legit and trying to become a Supreme Court judge, he ain’t speaking to anybody on such high ranking matters unless he’s getting something out of it. Colleague or not. He played stupid to wiggle out of her angle of questioning, he is a lawyer after all, playing the plausible deniability card is light work to him.
@@benfordrobert45 he dodged her
Ah third world america. The snotty, the rude, the hideous vs The normal, the humble, the hard working.
This fucking joke of a woman is our new VP. What a joke
@@taylorb7191 not yet. It will go to the SCOTUS and Brett will get his revenge
And she fcked her way to the top
I bet no matter what questions get answered, all democrats vote no. He will still be confirmed with or without them. Waist of time
Due ewe think sew?
I think some Dems will flip, like with Neil Gorsuch. Some are in red/moderate states and they need to seem more moderate.
That being said, Kavanaugh will be confirmed.
He shouldn't be up there, Merrick Garland should have been having this hearing 2 years ago according to the constitution. The right wing in this country, are hypocrites, and the left wing are weak..
@@ronniedixon9919 Correction - both sides are hypocrites, and they're playing politics. Humor me for one moment. Imagine:
It's 2016, and a republican president nominates a conservative to the court. Democrats are in the same position as republicans were. What do they do?
Answer: the same fucking thing. Democrats are mad because they lost. They would have done the same damn thing.
+ronnie dixon
Democrats started all of this nonsense by targeting and blocking reagan's nomination Robert Bork.
And when they did that the republicans had to wait until Garland to get payback. None of the two sides are clean in this but democrats cannot just sit their and take the high horse on this since it was they who started it all.
He doesn’t remember things, but when Dr. Ford doesn’t no one cares
The BrainWasher exactly!
There’s no fucking evidence
I was literally just thinking this
Because she's the "victim"
And boom goes the dynamite!
She was horrible then and she's worse now
Waiting for Kavanaugh's revenge
same here
Yes sure, and we've seen examples of his revenge since he got put on the SC, haven't we?
"Do you know how to talk?"
"Talk? What kind of talk?"
"The talk we do every day sir."
"I don't know what you mean."
"Do you know what mean means?"
"Meaning?"
"Do you know what a question is?"
"Is that a question?"
"Yes sir."
"Um."
And that’s how you do it. What a fucking gangster. Make these people ask a real question.
Those are the most childish questions. I seriously hope you're never a reporter.
A smh
m bk Lmaooo yess he don’t even know how to talk!
m bk 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣
They talk about bias.. but it shows themselves they are the one who are biased and a political circus player.
What they did to Thomas and Kavanaugh is criminal.
My favorite part is when he answers the question and then she says he's not gonna answer it.
@@boncoeur7229 This was top notch and forthright questioning from Senator Harris
“I don’t remember” oh yea he really answered the question real well
@@gregpinta3021 your missing the end part where he in fact answers the question. Try watching the whole video not just a CNN sound bite.
#themoreyouknow.
If you lack the skills to find it I can send you a timestamp just ask ^_^
@@baccorame3058 Oh of course, because I have a different thought process to you i must just get breast-fed news from cnn. And yea, I watched the whole video. The best answer he gave was "I might have, but i don't know who works there." Thats such an obvious dodge but you refuse to see it because it doesn't fit your narrative. be better.
@@gregpinta3021 Kamala herself is unable to answer her impossible question, what makes you think kavanaugh is any different?
Harris: Do you like doughnuts?
Kavanaugh: What's a doughnut? Show me a roster of doughnuts.
Harris: So you decline to answer?
Kavanaugh: Potatoes
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂 Exactly
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You sir just won the internet!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🤘
This guy has touted himself as a highly qualified lawyer, but during this exchange, he acted like a borderline idiot.
lol
"When your mother knows you're lying" 😂
LOL yes!
She’s a liberal scumbag
Who's lying? Surely no Kavanaugh!
belle mcellis get out of the closet? That sounds mighty homophobic of you, my good man. Perhaps you are the scumbag and not jonny?
Jonny World m. Hey fcc
Rooster is almost home
Chickens are coming home to roost-
So much going on in this video. Most importantly, I'd like to direct your attention to the man in the back at 3:57
thank u
The guy cracking up about rabbits......cracks me up every time. Love ya whoever you are!
Crazy how Dr Ford gets talked to extremely nicely and he gets treated like he’s completely stupid when she asks a vague question about a law firm that he has no idea who works there.
If he doesn't know everyone who works at the law firm, how is he suppose to know if he spoke to someone from that law firm?
Like Harris said it matters who he's talked too not whether he knows the person or not
@@Comicf_Breaks she's asking if he spoke with anyone who worked at the law firm. He should have answered, "Not that I know of" or "I'm not aware of speaking to anyone at that law firm about this matter." She could have said, "Did you speak with (name)," and he could have said, "Yes, but I was not aware that he/she worked for that law firm." It seems to me that she was trying to trap him and he was trying to avoid being trapped. Playing cat and mouse.
@@veronicamoore5560 so she was being a prosecutor
Veronica Moore. What kind of silly statement is that, you don't have to know someone at a law firm to speak to them about any subject matter.
@@hotbiz123 True, but Kavanaugh might have spoken about Mueller to someone from that law firm without knowing that the person he was speaking to _was_ from that law firm. So by answering "no", he would be unwittingly saying something untrue. That was the trap Kamala was trying to set, so that she could accuse him of lying. It's an old trick, but sometimes it still works.
But Veronica is still on the wrong track. Kavanaugh might not have known _everyone_ who worked at that law firm, but he still could have spoken to someone about Mueller who he _did_ know worked at that law firm.
.
"I'll move on because you're not going to answer the question" - Literally, as he's JUST ANSWERED THE QUESTION
Wow she is such a class act... I don't like you I dont want you to be justice, so im going to ask you a loaded obscure question, to make you look like you support trump and is helping him with the Mueller report , ask it in such a weird way you can't answer it, then accuse you of not answering it because you think it will damage you somehow... yet somehow I dont think this guy would do that so the question came to him as more of a I need more context so I can answer accurately, you are leaving it far too open and I don't understand, I am a Judge up for Justice of the supreme court, so please be specific... Because what your asking sounds like a trap and im 15 moves ahead of you in a chess tournament.
So now he does not know who he talks to recently how can he remenber what he did 30 years ago
Brele will - That law firm has over 250+ workers. How is he going to remember all the dozens of conversations that went on during his time there??
He keeps a calendar
Well why wouldn't he just sau if he did it was not knowingly. That it may have been outside the firm and he wasn't aware they worked there.
@@TheCommandostudios He doesn't have to remember anyone specifically because she clearly asked "have you spoken to ANYONE, EVER, about the investigation " and he could say yes or no. If your comment was your attempt at covering for him you just did a piss poor job.
Exactly
What a nasty person. She must be very unhappy.
Her own dad is ashamed of her. Says a lot!
It's a cross examination, this is what lawyers do every day, not everything is personal and emotional like you apparently make it out to be. It's just a job.
@@Mewstor151 congratulations on exposing your ignorance. Learn a little bit about what actually happened during these sessions before you embarrass yourself.
@@dereksbooks Why bother writing this if you aren't going to respond to what I said? I watched the entire hearing. It is a basic cross examination, no different than what you would see at a trial. They don't even have to run these confirmation hearings, they aren't in the constitution. They can ask whatever they want to in their 30 minutes. Try and find something wrong with this other than "it hurt my feelings!"
@stillstabbin1 lol. Says the dumbass who calls a complete stranger a "bigot" without knowing a single thing about her. Do you morons understand hypocrisy? Of course not. The rules don't apply to you, never have.
Why Hello Kamala, Mr. Kavanaugh would like a word with you.
We’re living in the hunger games future now guys
😂😂😂😂 you right
But are we though?
SAY WHAT MOM
@@kitty-vk8ic WHO S RIGHT ABOUT WHAT
Those people screaming are so freaking annoying. Like just let us hear the point he’s trying to make.
He was just so smart, to play stupid. It was simple question, which shouldve been a simple answer. Yes or no.
There was no point...
You need to remember that liberals of fascist that suppress speech they don't agree with
two years later during ACB hearings. If he doesn't know who works at the law firm, how can he know if he had a conversation with anyone who works at the law firm?
And he is a judge???????????????????not qualified to be a judge.
Even though she waisted a lot of time trying to get a response.I think that it shouldn’t take a honest person 5 second to give a clear answer
The only honest answer would have been "I don't know did I?"
use your head please, he is not a jedi to know who works at the law firm, is not a simple question is a stupid one, he cannot answer with certainty and she should know.
Ever testify in front of the senate on National TV? No? Then give the guy a break.
You did hear the question in the issues with that question... Right that everybody knows everybody have a law firm or associated with it. It could be the runner... Like it's coffee. Don't be stupid. She should just say the names. and let him lie or tell the truth a more trick question. Such a big question looking to to apply a lie. He might have talked to the garbage man that worked at the law firm. He was pretty clear. Tell me a name or names and I'll tell you if I talk to them.. Headed to her so she ate with that firm and then she has to your question.
Looks like youre not privy to how senate hearings work. Democrats are notorious for baiting traps to make the nominee APPEAR to be not telling the truth. Kavanaugh is extremely qualified for the Supteme Court. Read some of the hundreds of opinions he's written.
She tried to bait him. He didn’t fall for it and asked for specifics which she wouldn’t do because it would foil her plot. Vague questions help steer a narrative.
she did try to bait him , but in the process exposed him as a liar
he says he dosent believe that he spoke with anyone besides the judges so why would he need to know who worked there or not , if he is trying to imply he hasnt spoken to anyone besides the judges
thats the equivalent of me asking "did you drank soda" , and you imply "yes but only at home"
and then i ask did you drink soda at a restaurant
and now you want to know the name of every restaurant in the city
well if you didnt drink soda outside of your home what difference would it make ??
the same applies here
if he didnt speak to anyone but judges who clearly dont work there , what difference would it make to know who works there ?
he obviously spoke to someone about the case .... he just dosent know if they work there or not and he dosent want to dig his own grave.. he should have been consistent and said idk
he almost did til she was interrupted by the other committee member. she almost had him
your forgetting that lawyers become judges. so any of the judges he spoke with could have worked at the law firm, but what would have solved the whole thing was giving him a list of people to pick from. Dont understand why that is something that couldnt or shouldnt have been done if the system was trying to find out the truth. Rather than trying to publicize people and events in certain ways.
darryl brown the restaurant thing is different, he’s asking about the people who work there because he doesn’t know everyone in the firm. How hard is it to understand. If she asked for a name and not the firm he should be able to respond but since he doesn’t know everyone that works there he can’t tell you the truth because he doesn’t even know if it’s the truth. Come on you are trying to put something together that isn’t there.
Seff H he seriously won’t answer any questions directly
Imagine if Kavanaugh ran for President in the Democratic party, She'd be jumping up and down for a chance to be his VP.
@Paul West lol! yes, that too!
Savagery
...that interruption makes me to want them to Vote YES.
They did, he was confirmed
You’d put a clearly corrupt and unqualified man in office because some of the people who don’t want him there are annoying and unprofessional? That’s a really weird hill to die on, I gotta say
Do you like cake?
What kind of cake?
So you don’t like cake
Well I need to know what kind of cake
Pulse Fox damn fine....red velvet lmao
*Pulse Fox*
LMAO 😂😂😂
+Pulse Fox Haha and that's a much more relevant exchange than what Kamala was interested in.
Cheesecake
So you guys don’t like cake right?
Sounds like she's setting up a perjury trap.
LOL! No perjury trap if you tell the truth. Which we know Donald Dump is incapable of.
@@dilbertdoe601 And looks who's still president, cleared on collusion and of obstruction suspicion/charges as well as Kavanaugh who still made it 😂. Hows that for good ol donald dump ?
Dilbert Doe: we both know trump is innocent of all charges and the dems can’t let it go cause if they do no one will vote for them cause a lot of people dislike them already.
@@BRAXMANoftheS quick search, Kasowitz Benson Torres law firm has some 350 lawyers. Add paralegals and various support staff, gotta be a thousand or more. It is a perjury trap, even if you do tell the truth. A DC lawyer like Kavanaugh interacting with someone from that firm, and not even knowing the person is from that firm, what do you think are the odds of that, I'd say pretty good.
@@dilbertdoe601 wake up and grow a pair
Poor Kamala. I’m afraid she checked into the Hotel California.
She confuses arrogance for strong leadership qualities . . . . Just a Nasty woman, Just a Nasty Question.
This is painful to watch. Excruciating. Really.
Brenda Thyne yes because
He's just wondering who sold him out
O-K
nobody did, she had nothing and was fishing blindly
She is a horrible human being, my God
She needs to be more professional. She talks to him like a girlfriend that just looked through his phone and found messages from another girl.
Fr 😂
@@geno9274 frfr
She was absolutely professional. He was the one who was too afraid to answer a simple question
She has that no nonsense I am not playing with you look in her eyes. He is afraid. This was the first time I really noticed her and I liked what I saw. If elected, she will not play with anyone=especially a Republican.
@@wisteria6599 that is why I like her so much.
I am drooling 🤤 with 🐜 anticipation 😋 for the Harris-Pence debate!
I already have my popcorn 🍿 and my Pepsi 🥤.
She’s already destroyed!!! ruclips.net/video/WabvabWvv8k/видео.html LOL!!!
3 22 Only in your dreams!!! She’s doki 💩💩💩 All she does is acuse but she has no brains 🧠
3 22 THE ONLY THING SHES DOING NEW IS CHANGING BIDENS PAMPERS!!! SHES THE SAME WITCH ACUSER WITH NO RECORD OF DOING ANYTHING. She can’t debate when she’s done nothing 👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸
Not waiting for that Biden/Trump debate though... Lmao clowns
I find it amazing the deceptive nature of those controlling the government. While employing it's citizens to be truth tell law binder people.
This woman is now one 80 year old heart attack away from the Presidency. Let that sink in for a moment.
To put this in perspective, imagine if someone asked you this while under oath:
Have you ever spoken to anyone at your previous workplaces about a current event in the news?
Imagine having to think back at every conversation you’ve ever had there, and whether or not that topic came up. You can’t definitely say “yes” or “no” under oath, because you could be wrong.
The answer is yes, i have and i can tell you what we talked about too. Its not a hard question, took me less than a second to think about it
@@jovannybenitez209 the difficulty of this question is different between people. And certainly you don't know memory capabilities of anyone. You don't know if he had any kind of memory related disease. Answering yes or no question can be a lie either way when you didn't remember those events. Doesn't matter if it takes you a second to answer while others take hours or days.
@@afiq2814 This is such a bullshit response I dont even know where to start. Not only that but the way Seethi tries to characterize it is bullshit as well. If it were that simple he wouldnt seem so hesitant to answer it. He knew exactly what she meant and was trying to dodge it in a way that wouldnt implicate him by being a right out lie. And what scared him is that he didnt know how much she knew. In his official capacity he should be aware of the difference between what is common knowledge and whats privileged. In fact even janitors that work in health care settings are aware of HIPPA violations and that they arent allowed to discuss anything they might overhear of a patients personal medical history. Its not a matter of memory, its a matter of discretion. That alone should eliminate the vast majority of people he had any real discussion of matters with.
@@esportsweapon6907 That was a bullshit question to begin with.
@@esportsweapon6907 the way harris asked was bullshit as well. He said he didn't know anyone there then how the fuck he can confirm that he ever talk with anyone in that firm. You are just like typical person who are clearly not a psychological expert or mind expert or speech expert but you try to indicate a person wrongdoings. In a court hearing, those kind of question are meant to find inconsistencies in a story. Whether from defendant, victims or witnesses. But clearly nothing inconsistence could be found and harris horribly failed. Let me tell you one thing I learn from a psychology professor... If a defendant directly answer a question with confidence and with high volume, that's indicate he already prepared the answer before the question asked. If he stumbled, that's mean he doesn't know a damn thing about a question and. That's not 💯 correct but following steps will be determined by experts. Clearly harris is not an expert on psychology. He speaks with thousand of people, how can he be sure if he can answer that. Especially when harris are avoiding his questions too. "Who works there". Harris didn't answer. She didn't even fucking know. That question just to trap kavanaugh whether he answer yes or no. Another thing, you didn't know how much he remembers. Don't expect his memory is like a computer. I'm sure you are not a person who can understand people very well.
She wasn’t asking who he talked to, she asked if she talked to anyone at that lawferm
butthole parkinsons - It still makes it a shitty question lol
Gonzales98 if a LAPD cop comes and talks to you and later on that day someone asks if you talked to someone from LAPD, you really gonna say I don’t know his name so I can’t don’t know if 🤷🏼♂️ and truly believe you cant answer the question
You’re not smart.
*lawfirm
@@andrewvital7623 Dumb analogy. It's more like, if a guy in a police uniform talks to you (in a city that happens to have multiple police units), and later someone asks you if you spoke to the LAPD, how can you answer with certainty? Think before commenting mate.
lmfaooo this logic is so flawed
It’s funny that she finds it hard to believe he can’t remember: I mean, she can’t remember the music she listened to in college...
You thought this comment was ground breaking Lmao
andrew rosa I guess it’s true: Every rose has its thorn...
I remember listening to a young Marshall Mathers, before he became Eminem, back in the day.
Could it be possible that Kamala was listening to Tupac & Snoop years before White folks knew who they were?
She thinks dead rappers are still alive so...
Oh no she remembers Tupac and smoking weed to it and they weren’t even rapping at that time she too old lol
I think it's so funny how hostile the line of questioning is. I've looked back to some of the Republican senators questioning of Kagan and Sotomayor and you see a little more hostility in the Sotomayor questioning based on some of her previous speeches, but nothing quite like this.
Not saying it's a partisan issue. Just saying how, looking back, the Kavanaugh hearing was just next level craziness.
Nothing was hostile. Lol. It’s a simple yes or no answer. He was evading lol
@@TheSoulstar7 "Be sure about your answer, Sir" and "You have an impeccable memory, I'm surprised you're having such a hard time with this."
You're right, no hostile tone in the line of questioning whatsoever. Furthermore, he did say he's not remembering any but that he can't be sure without knowing about which employee she is asking. Unless the conversation was with Mark Kasowitz himself lol
@@TheSoulstar7 you got it explained by others, people change position and there is hundreds of them, there is no way he could remember if he taled to employe of that law firm, he might remember person but not if that person was working in specific law firm. How is that not obvious
@@logand3957 You don’t see ANY reason at all why she wouldn’t give the name he talked to before he answers yes or no? No reason at all? I get that her lines of questioning were pretty snarky, but the phrasing of the question is standard procedure during a court of law
Total evasion. He is not a stupid person. He was trying to be coy and play her and he ended up looking suspicious. 🙄
She had him if she had asked if he had discussed anything pertaining to Mueller's investigation with ANYONE HE KNEW TO BE EMPLOYED by the law firm in question.
no she is a horrible person
Doing a simple Google search, I found that Kasowitz Benson Torres employs 350 lawyers in multiple states. That's not even counting the other staff that they have. How can he be expected to remember whether he talked to someone with that firm? Also, he may have talked to someone who was not with the firm at the time but later joined.
Inherently Singular: Because at least one person who is now at that firm, Edward McNally, worked in the Bush White House at the same time Kavanaugh worked there. If that is indeed the person that Harris is referring to, it's very unlikely that Kavanaugh didn't know when he spoke to him that McNally worked at the firm. I think what she is getting at is that Kavanaugh may have privately made disparaging remarks about Mueller and his investigation to McNally, who passed on this information to Kasowitz, who in turn informed Trump, which made the latter regard Kavanaugh favorably as a possible Supreme Court pick. Just speculating.
Why not just say to whom she was referring to?
Inherently Singular Stop being stupid. If he met someone who said where they work, during a. Introduction, he’d know if they were from the firm that represents trump. And pls don’t suggest he just talks to anyone and. Doesn’t know who they are, where they work.
Boy please he had to much hesitation he didn't know what to say he was caught you could see it in body language and no words please he lied right to the AMERICAN PEOPLE AND congress you want him as a judge please
@@deemack5142 it takes effort to reach ignorance of your level, the only thing worse is the people that agree with you lol.
Answer: Not knowingly
Yes, but then all she would have to demonstrate is that he did know and lied about that.
Or just use the safe line “i don’t remember” and act dumb
Or... law firms have hundreds of people and it’s irresponsible to request that a person know every person in a firm.
@@samjosh9246 Do you believe he knew exactly who she was speaking of?
Glowgirl nope! I don’t think Kamala knew who she was speaking of otherwise should would have asked “have you talked with X about the muller investigation”. It’s a sleazy tactic to try to entrap him.
I'm onto you Kamala.
Ah, more career politicians acting silly ..... wonderful.
Lowkey entertaining lol
BRO she wanted a “gotcha” so bad, but couldn’t get it. Hahahaha
It was close though: 07:23 "I don't know if the.... I don't know anyone" like he was gonna say "I don't know if the person I spoke with works there"
Anthony Richardson it’s not though 🥴
Anthony Richardson it’s called being ✨smart✨
Anthony Richardson she wouldn’t specify who she was referring to or who was in the law firm she referred to because she’s a ✨Snake✨ who put countless people in prison over marijuana and ✨laughed about it✨ she’s actually proven to be ✨awful✨ why would anybody talk to her?
Scamala is a fraud from way back. She'll be slithering back to her hole in the squalor of the heaping hellhole that is The Bay Area soon enough. On her knees I'm sure.
Who is the dude behind Senator Lee picking his teeth. Gross!
Your modifier is dangling, Carolanne. Is this “dude” picking Senator Lee’s teeth or his own? 🤪
haha
@@David-mh2jn Not a dangling modifier. An unclear referent. But funny.
@DI Let's all go to court and pick our boogers and dump on the floor then.
@DI WOW, you don't think doing that ON CAMERA in front of the world is gross. What a pig you must be.
do you remember if you had a conversation about Putin with a mechanic who has a cousin from India?
Yes !
Bruh the question wasn’t like that stop lying
@@mike_404 right ! He knew exactly who she was talking about. That's why his mouth got dry REAL FAST 😂😂😂
@@DevTheDudeRN that’s right
Glad he got on the bench!!!!
And anyone that disrupts needs a few years in jail
Omg the guy at 3:24 busts out laughing at the protester 😂
That's how they laugh when people protest losing their healthcare too
@michael hines no ..that's not what I'm talking about. They wanna take it away from 30milion people with preexisting conditions. Born with conditions.
I think it’s Julian Castro.
No I think he was laughing at the reference of rabbits, given how they multiply and looked at his homie in afirmation
HE WAS LAUGHING AT THIS RABBITS COMMENT11!!1
I hope he remembers this
She is the worst questioner in the history of juris prudence.
It doesn't matter who he knows at the law firm the POINT is whether or not he spoke about it. He's not supposed to speak about ongoing cases he's a judge ...Damm people..Read Between the lines..smh..
jenny van stock it’s not a case, nor is it a case he’s hearing at the moment. It’s something that’s all in the media. Dumbass!!
No. It's not a case HE is on. So.....no. You should smack you head, might get your brain to restart.
Yeah it fucking DOES matter when her question is did you talk to anyone WHO WORKS AT THAT LAW FIRM.... if he doesnt know who works there he cant know if he talked to anyone of them... wow you guys are stupid rlly...
Jeffrey Lebowski wait so you saying we’re allowed to do anything as long as we don’t know we’re doing wrong?
No...? Maybe read it again, watch the video again, and turn ur brain on this time =) no offense...
If i asked you if you had seen anyone today, who had joghurt for breakfast, would you be able to answer my question with yes or no? No... because you dont know everyone whos had joghurt or know what everyone has had that you've seen today...
People commenting on here saying that Sen. Harris wasn't specific with her question - You're dumb. She wasn't asking for a name, unless he had one for her. She asked a quite simple, direct question that could've been answered with a yes or no, like she has said to begin with. He enjoys beating around the bush so he can take up time and avoid questions that obviously make him uncomfortable and drip sweat all over the place. I have to give him credit for being able to avoid easy questions like a pro, but who's that helping?
Cheer up, Chey. Tomorrow is the first of the month. Pay day for people like you. Maybe someday you'll earn a real paycheck and divorce yourself from the poverty pimp Democrats.
He cant know, if he spoke about muller with a person that is working at a specific law firm if he doesnt know whos working at that law firm... how fucking simple is that, yet you guys and harrison dont get it omg... idiots
Analogy: "Did you see anyone today who had green tea for breakfast...?" "I have no idea who had green tea but if you tell me i can tell you if i saw any of them." "YOU KNOW WHO YOU SAW! ANSWER MY DIRECT QUESTION!" hahahaha retarded
So he just speaks to random people about Muller's investigation? He'd know who he was speaking to, their position, and who they worked for.
How does one confirm or deny an instance with an unknown party? How is that not clicking?
Moron, a "simple direct question" was when Kavanaugh asked who she was referring to and she couldn't name the individual for obvious reasons.
In case you need a reminder of how horrible Harris is
Imagine being falsely accused of sexual assault and being treated like this. Is there a more infuriating injustice?
watching this 11/9/20. Feels like it happened 10 years ago.
I just find it odd that judge Cavanaugh says he does not remember and is immediately attacked. However, Dr. Ford cannot remember if she gave anyone medical documentation or talk to anyone about her documentation and yet nobody is hammering her for not remembering.
She's not the one interviewing for a lifetime job onto the highest court in the USA.
There's a difference between not remembering something that happened 36 years ago and something that happened within the past two years.
@@laurenj6974 No, but her answers directly affect his (possible) appointment.
she didnt even remember if she financed her own polygraph or not and if she went to her grandmas funeral that day or not.
No, but she did accuse a man of sexual assault. Both situations deserve the similar amounts of fair aggressive investigation.
edit: Let me be more clear.... I'm not talking about the specific differences of the nature of these situations. All I am trying to say is that this is not some kind of trolley dilemma. They allotted time specifically to question these people and/or those involved with whatever they are trying to figure out. They do not lose anything by making fair and valuable use of that time.
Have you ever had a conversation with anyone? Yes or no?
It is a trap question to accuse him of perjury
YOU KNOW VERY WELL WHO I MEAN
There are 1000s of people who work there
Russell H ....and doesn’t know a single soul, isn’t he weird?
@@ryanmeyer5355 he doesn't know if he's not talked to any of them
I bet Kamal Toe Harris wishes she never tried debating with Kavanaugh now she’s depending on him if the election goes to court..... oh how ironic.....😂
He never lied. He said “I don’t know who you are referring to. I’ve spoke to fellow judges of the case and in passing may have caught wind of conversations. I can’t give you specific names because I don’t have to. Yes I’ve spoken about the investigation. No I’m not saying any names. I can confirm if you have a specific name otherwise move on”
He didn’t he also never answered the question, it’s a yes or no. Not hard. Anyone. She doesn’t ask who, she just asked if he talked to anyone. Anonymous. This is hella silly.
Idk I would think its not hard to remember if you spoke to someone from a law firm, even if you’re not sure who they were.
@@ggwurld 1. That is exactly what he said rewatch the video. 2. Freedom of speach means you dont have to say anything he answered the question the way he wanted to and that was very much allowed. She should've been more specific. He doesn't have to self incriminate
That's the point. She wasn't referring to a particular staff member at the Law firm. The Robert Mueller Investigation was front-page news just before she asked Kavanaugh that question. Logically, you'd think he would have remembered if he spoke to a well-known Law firm about it. Her question was fair.
@@jamesirwin8917 again logically if you were in his position you wouldn’t self incriminate either
reminds me of questions like
would you rather....
he's very clever answering
all i gotta say is, these are the nicest security i’ve ever seen
amzn.to/2QVAED2
Lots of cameras
Thumbs up for everyone here excited to see Justice Kavanaugh's turn to ask questions.... lol
I’m curious, but why were there people
Yelling? Did they say “vote no”?
They were trying to stop the hearings from moving forward due to thousands of withheld documents that would provide more information into Kavanaugh. They released 42k pages the night before his confirmation hearing so this evidence was never brought to light. This is where you see the real activists and freedom fighters, not the folks here on youtube 😔
@@thaliaberdz to be honest, this is the first that I have heard this, and I truly appreciate you for filling me in.
@@bigboi57 I appreciate you and your curiosity 😊 my pleasure!
@@thaliaberdz They were trying to stop the hearings because it was an immense waste of time to begin with. And it still ended up going nowhere, because there was nothing behind it.
@@dustinmyers5559 going nowhere? Trump's own campaign manager was convicted of conspiracy and tax fraud. He was wired 18M. There were at least 13 people indicted and found guilty! That's why his campaign is now bringing up Hunter Biden. They are just deflecting from what they've already done. Come on, you can't see that?