I liked your comments, stopped at the beginning, watched the film and carried on with your video. I liked the film very much, it showed me that deep inside I was both "men". ..finding God in certain miraculous moments and also rejecting faith when suffering is too strong... so I found it very interesting and very human! Thanks for sharing❤
The historical freud and the historical Lewis are mined to produce a seemingly extempore dialogue, but the historical record is a fiction. Can you produce truth from partial truth? We see the Truth as through a glass darkly, but it is a fraction of the whole: in this treatment we are asked to use the fraction that became the histories to construct two men looking through the glass as they do so. This only matters if either one or both are worth listening to - that is that they could be original speakers - since I can think of some who can be guaranteed to stick to their script through thick and thin in which case the historical approach might be valid, if not worth the trouble of portraying it.
I liked your comments, stopped at the beginning, watched the film and carried on with your video. I liked the film very much, it showed me that deep inside I was both "men". ..finding God in certain miraculous moments and also rejecting faith when suffering is too strong... so I found it very interesting and very human! Thanks for sharing❤
Thanks Mark. Watched this last week. Was a bit dissapointed by it to be honest. Not a patch on Shadowlands.
Twas ideas driven and that's not gonna have the drama, yup...
The historical freud and the historical Lewis are mined to produce a seemingly extempore dialogue, but the historical record is a fiction. Can you produce truth from partial truth? We see the Truth as through a glass darkly, but it is a fraction of the whole: in this treatment we are asked to use the fraction that became the histories to construct two men looking through the glass as they do so. This only matters if either one or both are worth listening to - that is that they could be original speakers - since I can think of some who can be guaranteed to stick to their script through thick and thin in which case the historical approach might be valid, if not worth the trouble of portraying it.
it would be a rather strange meeting