It's always telling when the plantiff just "It was an illegal unit and I stayed there for eight months so I should get my eight months back and emotional distress".
I’m honestly certain that he just had no idea how his lease worked considering he had all these middle men giving him vague information about a foreclosure. I don’t think he understood that he automatically went to a month-to-month basis afterwards either, you can see it in his face when the judge informs him. Given so, he probably felt like he lost a home, money, and wasn’t going to continue losing being so late in and getting kicked out. All things considered in his shoes, who wouldn’t think that suing would be the best thing to do to understand what the hell is going on? 😅😂
@@mario23sb that's problem isn't it? Suing is the last thing I would think to do when I dont know anything about how a foreclosure affects a rent contract. Suing is time consuming and costs money. It's crazy to me that someone who knows this little about how a rent contract works would have the drive to sue. Usually, a lack of knowledge makes u humble, not more sure of urself. But this might be me being a stuck up educated person thinking things I have learned is common knowledge for all when it's privelege.
@@dance4life1208 I think u should assume that yes. But to think that means u get all the past months money back? That doesn't make any sense. It smells like he smelled an opportunity to me. His logic makes no sense.
These cases were recorded years ago, and considering the defendant said he tried to short sale his home he was probably upside down on mortgage payments. With the amount of money he could save up by not paying and also renting to the plaintiff, all the money would go in his pocket and he could purchase a cheaper home
@hadley407 facts! The predatory lending back then was ridiculous, too. Once people realized they couldn't escape the foreclosure, they just had to go with the flow and scrimp and save by any means necessary. Credit was shot at that point, and some couldn't even buy a new home for years!!
Not only did the defendant get to put the mortgage payment in his pocket, he got to put the plaintiffs rent payment in his pocket. He should have had a lot of money saved up to purchase a new place when his home was foreclosed upon.
Why did the plaintiff "feel that it's Illegal (sic) to pay rent to someone if the property is to be foreclosed" and he could get all his rent back? Ka-ching, ka-ching. Money, baby, money.
@@lukerinderknecht2982 Because it's not "illegal" to pay rent in such a circumstance, even if it could (somewhere) be "illegal" to accept it. Yeah, I don't see how either, but my take on the plaintiff's use is that it's certainly not the right word.
@@lukerinderknecht2982 Usually, but I think it can also apply to bad reasoning. According to Wikipedia: "The Latin adverb sic (pronounced [sɪk]; "thus", "just as"; in full: sic erat scriptum, "thus was it written")[1] inserted after a quoted word or passage indicates that the quoted matter has been transcribed or translated exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous, archaic, or otherwise nonstandard spelling, punctuation, or grammar. It also applies to any surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might be interpreted as an error of transcription." Note that last sentence.
I feel this way about adults in general. Reading isn’t a super power and the internet is everywhere. Make use of a smart phone that isn’t scrolling the TikToks and actually understand the circumstances you’re in and what you can do.
@@juliettek.9440It’s not the reading that is the problem, it’s being able to process the information that they have read about and the ability (or lack of…) to analyze things, situations, circumstances, events…. Analyze life in general! And sadly enough, there are many people who can’t do that. In THIS case however, the plaintiff was just lazy and only saw the dollar signs before his eyes!!!!!
How in the world did he think he'd get back all the rent he paid?? That's illogical. And if the situation were reversed, would he hand over 5k to a renter if his property foreclosed?? Absolutely not. This is a risk of renting, but it is not illegal.
The city shut the water down on my street for two days upgrade, so I'm not paying the months rent cause my lease states the landlord pays for water. If only that was the case lol.😂
Sad thing is that there are people that are that delulu. That would like everyone here in South Louisiana where I live that they aren't going to pay their mortgages or rent for the time that we were without power after Hurricane Ida 2 years ago. Just not how things work.
Does the suit on the Plantiff look super duper big compared to his head, or is it jst me? He reminds of the Goombas on the Mario movie!! 😂😂 He looks like an interesting guy for sure, per usual sheer perfection.👌 👍 ❤😊
I hate it when ignorant plaintiffs want to live for nothing. I know it's a tv show and it's supposed to be entertaining but how many incompetent people can one show show.
I don't like the silly announcement in the beginning and I don't like this theatralic yelling from the judge. The only authentic judge show is and will be forever Judge Judy. Noone else comes close to her.
Plaintiff thought, "how can I cash in on this situation?"
It's always telling when the plantiff just "It was an illegal unit and I stayed there for eight months so I should get my eight months back and emotional distress".
I’m honestly certain that he just had no idea how his lease worked considering he had all these middle men giving him vague information about a foreclosure. I don’t think he understood that he automatically went to a month-to-month basis afterwards either, you can see it in his face when the judge informs him. Given so, he probably felt like he lost a home, money, and wasn’t going to continue losing being so late in and getting kicked out.
All things considered in his shoes, who wouldn’t think that suing would be the best thing to do to understand what the hell is going on? 😅😂
I would have assumed I would get kicked out too the house is about to be foreclosed on
@@mario23sb that's problem isn't it? Suing is the last thing I would think to do when I dont know anything about how a foreclosure affects a rent contract. Suing is time consuming and costs money. It's crazy to me that someone who knows this little about how a rent contract works would have the drive to sue. Usually, a lack of knowledge makes u humble, not more sure of urself. But this might be me being a stuck up educated person thinking things I have learned is common knowledge for all when it's privelege.
@@dance4life1208 I think u should assume that yes. But to think that means u get all the past months money back? That doesn't make any sense. It smells like he smelled an opportunity to me. His logic makes no sense.
Foreclosure… I hardly knew her! 😂
😂😂😂. I hate his stupid sayings.
@@crystalshaw8744 yeah the 'hardly knew her' one is his go-to, and I hate it!
The defendants are crooked AF. Collecting rent but not paying the mortgage. They must've had a friend at that bank to slide for 2 years.
It's unethical but I wish they would make it illegal. There was a big trend years back of this and poor folks being kicked out suddenly.
Why would they not pay if they are collecting rent
Debts exceeded their income...living beyond their means or maybe one of them got sick.
Probably by that time the bank didn't want the money, they wanted the property and wasn't going to accept anything without all the fees attached.
These cases were recorded years ago, and considering the defendant said he tried to short sale his home he was probably upside down on mortgage payments. With the amount of money he could save up by not paying and also renting to the plaintiff, all the money would go in his pocket and he could purchase a cheaper home
@hadley407 facts! The predatory lending back then was ridiculous, too. Once people realized they couldn't escape the foreclosure, they just had to go with the flow and scrimp and save by any means necessary. Credit was shot at that point, and some couldn't even buy a new home for years!!
2:20 How do you feel something is illegal? What does that feel like?
What a shame !
I don’t feel sorry for the defendants at all. They didn’t pay for 2 years!!!!
How the hell do you even avoid bankers for two years?!?!?
They are just below the government on the relentless scale.....
Agreed
Not only did the defendant get to put the mortgage payment in his pocket, he got to put the plaintiffs rent payment in his pocket. He should have had a lot of money saved up to purchase a new place when his home was foreclosed upon.
yeah.. he must be rich now
Who does the voiceover at the beginning? They always sound like they're enjoying themselves so much 😅
The guy that isn't Doug, my question is do they hear it in court?
And not Harvey
@@bobbrown9161 yes because sometimes they laugh at it.
It’s Kurt. I believe he did the interviews after the case until around 2015 or so. But I could be wrong. Doug is shady, but Kurt was MEAN! Haha
Curt Chaplin
He's still living there and not paying rent so the bank will take for security and any damages🎯 He will owe the bank $😂
That jacket is two sizes too big.
Hello and good day to you ladies and gentlemen watching this episode ❤
Why did the plaintiff "feel that it's Illegal (sic) to pay rent to someone if the property is to be foreclosed" and he could get all his rent back? Ka-ching, ka-ching. Money, baby, money.
Let the cash register ring!
I'm confused by the use of "(sic)" in your comment.
@@lukerinderknecht2982 Because it's not "illegal" to pay rent in such a circumstance, even if it could (somewhere) be "illegal" to accept it. Yeah, I don't see how either, but my take on the plaintiff's use is that it's certainly not the right word.
@@BobBlumenfeld oh I see what you were trying to do now.
BTW, (sic) is used in the case of spelling or grammatical errors, not factual errors.
@@lukerinderknecht2982 Usually, but I think it can also apply to bad reasoning. According to Wikipedia:
"The Latin adverb sic (pronounced [sɪk]; "thus", "just as"; in full: sic erat scriptum, "thus was it written")[1] inserted after a quoted word or passage indicates that the quoted matter has been transcribed or translated exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous, archaic, or otherwise nonstandard spelling, punctuation, or grammar. It also applies to any surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might be interpreted as an error of transcription."
Note that last sentence.
Definitely he knows he will get nothing from the new property owner because he has been a squatter this whole time
Foreclosure? He hardly knew her
Ikr 😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
lol
@@trudypops it was the only thing i was thinking while watching the intro 🤣🤣
I am sorry but grown men who cant handle their owr business just rub me the wrong way... like get it together Sir
I feel this way about adults in general. Reading isn’t a super power and the internet is everywhere. Make use of a smart phone that isn’t scrolling the TikToks and actually understand the circumstances you’re in and what you can do.
@@juliettek.9440It’s not the reading that is the problem, it’s being able to process the information that they have read about and the ability (or lack of…) to analyze things, situations, circumstances, events…. Analyze life in general!
And sadly enough, there are many people who can’t do that.
In THIS case however, the plaintiff was just lazy and only saw the dollar signs before his eyes!!!!!
To be every thing you every wanted to be and every thing that rested in you rested in me everything you wanted to be
And the Plaintiff is probably a slob and will be back in court suing for the deposit he's not going to get back due to the damage that he caused.😉🐌🍼😂
Foreclosure, he hardly knew her
Dang 2 years???? My goodness
The plaintiff has a valid case, he has the wrong defendant.
People should try to make money by working not suing
How in the world did he think he'd get back all the rent he paid?? That's illogical. And if the situation were reversed, would he hand over 5k to a renter if his property foreclosed?? Absolutely not. This is a risk of renting, but it is not illegal.
PLAINTIFF thinks hes special!!
The city shut the water down on my street for two days upgrade, so I'm not paying the months rent cause my lease states the landlord pays for water.
If only that was the case lol.😂
Sad thing is that there are people that are that delulu. That would like everyone here in South Louisiana where I live that they aren't going to pay their mortgages or rent for the time that we were without power after Hurricane Ida 2 years ago. Just not how things work.
Does the suit on the Plantiff look super duper big compared to his head, or is it jst me? He reminds of the Goombas on the Mario movie!! 😂😂 He looks like an interesting guy for sure, per usual sheer perfection.👌 👍 ❤😊
Curt
I don’t feel bad for either of them
Bunch of grifters
😮😮 bank of trash . And wells fargo trash . They do same thing they never do modifications
I hate it when ignorant plaintiffs want to live for nothing. I know it's a tv show and it's supposed to be entertaining but how many incompetent people can one show show.
Attn blk flk STOP 🛑 BANKN WITH BANK OF AMERICA
Someone has watched just enough People's Court to be "dangerous".
He obviously ran some actual rules about renting together.
First 😅😅😅Cookies for everyone 😋 🍪🍪🍪🍪🍪🍪
Nom nom nom
Yummy for my tummy!! Thank you...giggle
I don't like the silly announcement in the beginning and I don't like this theatralic yelling from the judge. The only authentic judge show is and will be forever Judge Judy. Noone else comes close to her.
Then why watch and why is there a need to comment?
Then bye bye, you will not be missed, Karen!
mmhhmmm....@@KurtPisocki
Early 😂