Love the Powered wakeboard, take some skill and finesse, Take that over a jet ski, the Trike version of a Motorcycle. I have 4 gas powered jet Surfs and an Electric Lampuga. The lampuga is fast but you only get maybe 20 minutes ride time, and a couple hours to recharge!
@@cameraman1234567890 according to whos number? their race model has a 100CC 2 stroke in it in a hard to breath space, they claim they are rated for close to 11kw....if power is what youre after you can do alot better for 20g.
@@WesV Fully aware and Im not disagreeing, The reason why you pay so much is because its a top of the line brand and because its a completely different sport. MSR Engines is what makes it so expensive with all of the latest technology as well. Another thing to note is that your analogy of Horsepower is inadequate. 20 Horsepower on a smaller vessel is a different scale of performance numbers since there is far less weight and mass. Since there is far less weight and mass, less energy is needed to achieve 30+ Mph. Then you look at a Jet ski that is 500 lbs and obviously has more room, a bit better of breathing room, and has the room to fit a supercharger/forced induction method. So obviously the ski will be faster and such. Dont even get me started on trailer hassles and such. I personally almost feel an electric board is more practical in terms of cost and raw performance, but unfortunately is alot of energy to recharge.
@@cameraman1234567890 im well aware of power to weight ratio, the real numbers come from the volume of water going through the nozzle. Havent done the math but ib be willing to bet that the ski puts the power down WAY better.
They should make one of these with a 250 thing would be fucking mental
Love the Powered wakeboard, take some skill and finesse, Take that over a jet ski, the Trike version of a Motorcycle. I have 4 gas powered jet Surfs and an Electric Lampuga. The lampuga is fast but you only get maybe 20 minutes ride time, and a couple hours to recharge!
What a sweet lake, man made right?
Question: I was wondering, where is the air intake for the engine located?
Cheers
the boot where the control cable goes into the board is the intake
Two awesome looking toys! Question: If you had to choose ONE, which would you go for?
The superjet, because it is really fast.
Had a 2011 jet ski now have a jetsurf .I would never go back....
Is this board on electric of benzine
I am about to put a deposit down on the Pro. Would love to hear your opinion of the jetsurf. Is it worth 12k?
where was this filmed?
Сергей Журавлёв a private pond in Wisconsin
Byron Foth damn nice place, dude! Oh and the equipment rocks!
How do you like the Jetsurf? How's the reliability?
Jet surf is a ball of fun. We havnt had any problems with it.
to expensive haven't seen anyone using in Florida
Looks like the Surf Jet is very tough to ride in even light chop.
TED Schmitt It's not since it's heavier it plows through waves
it seems to me that this must be extremely boring after using it for more than an hour
Jorge Merlevede for 15k yeah its not worth it
Looks way more fun than wake boarding tbh.
Jorge Merlevede So does sex after an hour but I still enjoy it the next time🤪
Nah, it starts at 9,900 which is still pricey to me
I WANA PLAY!!!
I 60 kmh col cazzo che li fa
Hmmm 100hp jetski or 3 horsepower wakeboard....
Wesley Vaughn Different riding experiences, gomer.
The Wakeboard is actually about 20HP
@@cameraman1234567890 according to whos number? their race model has a 100CC 2 stroke in it in a hard to breath space, they claim they are rated for close to 11kw....if power is what youre after you can do alot better for 20g.
@@WesV Fully aware and Im not disagreeing, The reason why you pay so much is because its a top of the line brand and because its a completely different sport. MSR Engines is what makes it so expensive with all of the latest technology as well. Another thing to note is that your analogy of Horsepower is inadequate. 20 Horsepower on a smaller vessel is a different scale of performance numbers since there is far less weight and mass. Since there is far less weight and mass, less energy is needed to achieve 30+ Mph. Then you look at a Jet ski that is 500 lbs and obviously has more room, a bit better of breathing room, and has the room to fit a supercharger/forced induction method. So obviously the ski will be faster and such. Dont even get me started on trailer hassles and such. I personally almost feel an electric board is more practical in terms of cost and raw performance, but unfortunately is alot of energy to recharge.
@@cameraman1234567890 im well aware of power to weight ratio, the real numbers come from the volume of water going through the nozzle. Havent done the math but ib be willing to bet that the ski puts the power down WAY better.