Explosive Allegations
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- The plaintiff says she met the defendant in a shelter and remembered her from a news story about a woman leaving a baby in a drug house. She’s suing her for car repairs and transportation services. The defendant says she was a victim of domestic violence, not a drug user. She claims the plaintiff and her son are con artists, and she’s countersuing for emotional distress.
#JudgeMathis #RealityTV #Court
![Eminem - Temporary (feat. Skylar Grey) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZaK9Wi5ho0o/mqdefault.jpg)
Once Doyle realized defendant was on crack at the end he looked shocked
That girl is on drugs. I’m sorry but Judge Mathis misjudged that one
His crack radar was off. When she stumbled at the end, that certified it for me
Yeah, all that slow talking proved it. They should have had the news video to back it up though. Because nobody would just make it up that it was on the news
@@jasonr.9863 i aint EVER seen a crackhead stumble
How you know that she is not just got a learning disability ya dont.
Like he frequently does.
Defendant is stumbling and can't stand up straight like she's high in court.
Talkin about it’s her shoes 👠 😆😆
Yeah, the judge missed this 1. He should have performed the crack test on her...
Both her and the mother drug addicts
They all are
I feel like y’all are trippin how is he supposed to know what happens after they leave the court room she didn’t start acting weird until after the ruling while his mothers eyes are closed and her head is swaying back and fourth throughout the whole case
I had to watch this over again to see what pissed the judge off so bad. That was so unnecessary. I wish the plaintiff had produced the article she was referring to.
You would think she would have brought that if she was so certain
judge Mathis still has crackish ways
coulda, shoulda, woulda....grown adults got no excuse for not knowing you need to bring all your documents, evidence, and proof with you to court to prove your allegations and case. Most don't bring their evidence because they don't any...if you have it, why would you leave it behind? If you simply "forgot", then you simply have to eat your mistake.
no , what was unnecessary was giving the plaintiff any money at all . the plaintiff committed FRAUD by knowingly trading a vehicle that she could not legally register .
@@marleonetti7 if it was illegal how did he have a clean title for the vehicle in court 🙄 pay attention before you comment
Judge Mathis did way too much yelling for me to the plaintiff.....
Exactly like she a kid it’s a certain way u talk to somebody😂
He didnt have breakfast
Yes he was wrong
I think what made judge Mathis mad is when the plaintiff tried to air out that defendant drug use but not her own. But I believe the plaintiff is telling the truth about that lady being on tv, but she wasn’t in the facility for drug use. And they defendant was high as hell! I don’t see how Judge Mathis looked passed that. He sees stuff when he wants to.
True
Exactly! If she would’ve started with “I’m a recovering addict and so is the defendant. That’s how and why we met at a shelter,” or something to that effect, he wouldn’t have gone off like that. The defendant is definitely on drugs though. I believe the mom 100%
The plaintiff was talking and I heard her attempt to air her own dirty laundry and JM went off prematurely and unnecessarily.
She technically lied from the gate. The girl wasn’t even in there for drugs! 🤣 I think he was mad about that.
Exactly, he’s starting to mess up more and more, might be time for retirement
Y’all I just googled the defendant & the plaintiff was ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!!!
Wow wow wow I knew it, you can tell she been down this road before and knew exactly what to do to keep that evidence out lol smh Mathis just don't like people automatically bringing up people's business because honestly it didn't need to be brought up at all
Judge Mathis gets to emotional over crackheads, never underestimate the power of a crackhead judge 😆
I would have said google it. Lol
I just googled too
I knew she wasn’t lying when she said it. No one just makes up a story like that. Like the son said, the woman couldn’t even stand up straight
They need to do drug test before they come to court , they all look 👀 high as a kite 🪁
There must be a “behind the scenes” story on this because the Judge was acting like he was about to jump off the bench. Yelling and hollering. Something triggered him.
Judge Mathis' brother had issues with cocaine and as a result, he and his wife had to take custody of his niece. He's mentioned this a couple of times over the years. That's why he gets so triggered with cases involving drug abuse.
He was definitely over the top as if he had a personal issue with this woman. Perhaps there was somering else she said that was perhaps edited out.Regardless he was still over the top and the admitted former drug addict behaved better than he did. I believe her as she said the woman had been in and put of the shelter. All the woman did was get paperwork from ONE of the three times she had been in the shelter. What about the other times.But I get the feeling the more the scammer talked judge Mathis softened his tone to the mentor. I think he began to see the scammer indeed had issues. Shame on you judge. That's why you don't jump the gun and sometimes as the judge your eyes and ears are all the proof you need.Kudos to the former addict for maintaining her composure cause a lot of people would have yelled back and took that L.
Yesssss I was scared for her
He sometimes acts bipolar like that.
Sometimes people forget you’re coming into a court of law and that’s why I wish he would stay away from some of the gossipy stuff. They come in there like they posting on Facebook without no proof. So I’m pretty sure he was staffed on this case and knew that the plaintiff was not telling the whole truth. Now if she had came in with the article and the news clipping about this woman’s past It would’ve been a different conversation. What if this defendant decided she wanted to work with children and she couldn’t because the plaintiff is putting out her version of this women’s narrative.
Dolan is watching her like, ‘she is a crackhead’.. he’s going straight to JM chambers tell him his crackhead radar is off bc he should’ve given her the test (a balled up piece of white paper) 😂😂😂
🤣😄🤣🤣
😆 definitely deserved the test
Doyle not dolan
😂😂😂
💀💀😂😂😂💀💀💀
Boy I tell you, do not throw stones at other people on Judge Mathis. The plaintiff should of known better.
People when you are in court. Present your hard copy evidence to a JUDGE. Do not throw stones and tell lies to try to win your case.
Y’all know talking and calling someone a crackhead is a trigger for Judge Mathias! He loses his entire mind 😂
Everyone is a crackhead to Mathis 😂😂
😂😂🤣🤣🤣all cells are gone. That is def his trigger
@@ChosenVessel82 🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I'm dying at the defendant at the end all hunched over talking to them like some troll under the bridge. I think she was on something.
Them ways showed up at the end
😂🤣🤣😂😂 I think so too!
Yessss 🤣🤣
It was them claws, my boy, she was talking with them claws
yea she held it together for the judge now i believe them
I would’ve went to jail on this day …. NO ONE would ever speak to my mother like that!
He said look at you, you can’t even stand straight
Fun fact: Some places refer to their DMV as BMV like Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Source: Insurance agent in 51* states (DC)
Some have DLC also....Driver's License Center
I was looking for a comment about this. I was like "TF she talking about" Thanks for educating me.
Very good to know.
I thought everyone in America knew this
BMV in Indiana
Granted the female plaintiff should never have shared the horrific allegations about the defendant without some evidence. But the judges reaction was way over the top. At the end of the testimony it was clear that there was something wrong with the defendant. In the hallway the defendant could barely keep her balance and her words were slurred worst than towards the end of the testimony. Judge Mathis jumped all over the plaintiff, and rightly so, but he also missed identifying the signs of a clearly inebriated and/or high defendant. I hope that Doyle mentioned this to Judge Mathis, because even Doyle’s facial expressions when they were standing in the hallway showed he had picked up on the defendants
“Crack-ish” behavior.
Completely agree.
That part 👊
The plaintiff said that she recognized the defendant from the news for leaving her child at a drug house & couldn't remember where the house was. I wish the judge would've let her prove it. That's a serious accusations for her to make.....if it actually happened.
Doyle telling judge what he suspects..is going to do what??
@@zorinamims6499 In a perfect world it would help to highlight that perhaps there was something to the story that the defendant allegedly has drug issues. But since the plaintiff didn’t have evidence to support her claim and the defendant appeared okay until the end of the case, Doyle sharing the defendant’s curious behavior with Judge Mathis would do what it do or what it don’t. Peace!
Look at how doyle is lookin at the defendant at the end😂😂😂 she high ASF
How can you tell she’s high?
@@opulence_prime her body language
Since Doyle and JM are good friends , I hope he checks him behind the scenes when he is wrong bc JM is completely out of line and he’s not always right
You know Doyle ain’t questioning anything judge messy says. He’s his employer
The fact the white girl didn't deny the news coverage is damning on the side of the sassy judge
I’m sure in her mind she did by giving the letters
Its not--its circumstantial evidence at best, especially considering that they edit out certain segments.
Wrong or not, I’m not letting NOBODY talk to my momma like that.
I need like 6 episodes a day. I’m outta Judy episodes
😂
Same I swear
Go to peoples court!! I’m running out of JM too 😭😭😭
Yeah I’m out of judge Mathis videos… Charleston White has been keeping me occupied 😭😂
I love Mathis and Paternity court videos
They are both addicts. Who are they kidding?
JM was in a mood on that episode 😬
Amber is def on drugs, Judge Mathis missed it on this one.
I’m talking skyscraper high! Lol!
He was extremely rude to the plaintiff’s mother!
So what tell her to stop lying everybody getting the business if you lie on somebody especially about being the crackhead you best believe you going to get the business
@@sidneyatkins6678 crazy part she prolly damn sure is a crackhead to so don’t say she was just lying she held onto that fact
He sensitive about drugs
That 20 years crackhead was trying to air out someone else
@@israeliteprincess6166 it's too not to
When she stumbled and the guy said “look at you” I fell tf out 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The judge is right if you say she abandoned her child because of her drug use, you better have proof. She said it was on national television, why didn't she have any proof of it? The defendant probably was on drugs though
Mathis oftentimes goes way off the rails with his nonsensical rants. To me that's the first sign of burn out. In any event I believe both litigants in this case. But the defendant's son did an outstanding job in presenting his case. Proud of him.
"plaintiff"
Indeed
I agree Adrian . Mathis did not need to go off the way he did . His attitude can be too much at times. I skip over some videos when I can tell his attitude is taking a turn honestly.
Yea it's bout time for him to retire
Why is he holding on to his mom like somebody wants her😂😂
I’d like to see Doyle do a reaction video to these cases 😂
That’s a great idea
I worked in Social Services for almost 20 years and I know that the Defendant could have very well been busted for drugs and child neglect and all she had to do was tell the courts and Social Services that she is ALSO a victim of domestic violence. That way, she doesn’t lose custody of her children. She is referred to a shelter which houses addicts as well as victims of DV. The paperwork will say victim of DV instead of drug abuse. The Judge should have been more receptive to the information the Plaintiff was giving. However, I do believe the Plaintiff is still using drugs.
The plaintiff had no information it was literally hearsay with nothing to back it up.
Can't find a single news article on it soil I think the plaintiff is definitely a liar.
At the domestic violence shelters here she must have a police report to document the claims and then it will be in her shelter intake paperwork. If she was on the news for leaving her baby at a crack house, she’d be in a county shelter with 3 hots and a cot more than likely.
Agree!
Yes! The Plaintiff's mother was definitely high on something. "There's no fool like an old fool!!! SMH
Stay off the drugs
This is too much of a mess but the “Just for me” perm is not sitting right with me on the plaintiff 👀 😂
if my calculations are correct this one might be good cause of the title. IDK we'll have to watch to find out
Before we even start......WHY DID THEY TRUST A PERSON WHO LEFT THEIR BABY FOR DRUGS
She was on drugs and if it was for another child I believe the plantiff
judge Mathis be PMSing some days.. and imagining a man have to sit there and watch another man scream at his mom
I wonder if the judge will re watch this and realize he got this one wrong. Sadly I’ve been affected by addiction long enough to tell when someone is high and that lady was high as a kite lol
Damn I was on the defendants side until the end she definitely was on drugs. She held her composure in front of the judge very well
that girl is clearly on drugs , you can tell them whatever you want to put down on that paper, he cut her off when she tried to explain it was on the news
"explaining "it was on the news" ain't proof in court. She could have been lying or mistaken that it was on the news; you don't know. If it was on the news, then go to the website and get a copy of the video and story to bring to court; or go down to the news station and request it for your upcoming court case. No excuses for not bringing your documented proof to court if its true - unless of course, you don't have any, 'cause it ain't true.
@@waldolydecker8118 lol true, but yet this isn’t a court of law where it’s beyond reasonable doubt. The judge had discretion on what he decided to believe and he failed to realize the defendant was on drugs or even worse, acknowledge it. I could tell by the way she walked in and was smiling lol, then I read the comments and affirmed myself. Is it proof? Nay but I have enough to make a formed opinion and the judge did not. If you don’t call them a crackhead he will or joke about it endlessly, if you call them a crackhead he’s so upset and wants proof.
@@AP-xw5px - you discredit your own comment. You can't first claim that the Judge had total "discretion on what he decided to believe," then complain that he failed to realize the defendant was on drugs. If the judge has total discretion, then he also has the discretion to either not believe the person was on drugs or even if they were, he may choose to believe it had no material negative relevancy to the primary issue on which he was ruling.
Stated another way - the Judge has no obligation to see it the way you see it. And since it is doubtful you have equal or more academic and professional work experience in the practice of law than Judge Mathis, most disputes between how you see a legal issue and how a certified Judge and lawyer like Mathis see an issue is quite frankly a "no contest" competition.
Jfc I hate how Judge Mathis immediately tries to humiliate someone once he finds out they did drugs; like I understand if they do something like choose drugs over kids, but he’s just waaaay to quick to call someone a “crackhead” and talk over them unprofessionally
Defendant is off balance walking in. And holding on to the stand.
They better not be dropping all these weekend videos because they plan on ghosting us these weekdays 😩
Chile I got the thumbnail all wrong.. The Plaintiffs look the same age 🤭 I just knew this was gonna be a couple vs a mistress case 🤣 that’s what I get for being messy 😂😂😂
They were acting like lover’s stupid the end. What man hugs his mom like that?
@@Proverbspsalms Right I was thinking the same thing they were all acting weird
Hilarious the defendant is high "right now"
Judge mathis is ridiculous i cant stand when he acts like this
Amber high as hell 🤣🤣🤣
the defendant should have counter sued for defamation and frivolous lawsuit.
the plaintiff won so it was not frivolous and the Mom said that and he was the one suing so defendant wouldn't have won either of those
@@flowergirlproductions the announcer said they both were suing
Whenever I see a grown man come into court with his mother....I cringe
Wow the judge got mad real fast!
When Judge Mathis said what he said to the gentleman at the end of the case complementing him, the look on his face was priceless. That meant a lot to him.
The way he destroyed her and the only thing that could come out of mouth was "wow" 🤣 I'm dying
😂😂🤣🤣🤣
Very handsome well spoken son she had
I can tell he wanted to rip JMs head off for speaking to his mother that way, but he held his calm & that’s good for him because he won his case!
This the one!
Trust me you do not want to smoke with Judge Mathis that's for damn sure
@@sidneyatkins6678 Right! That man is crazy lol
She’s definitely on drugs and probably selling out of her house.
Thats why the drug task force went to her house. Why would they go to a woman’s house who has no association with drugs
I went to the BMV and they laughed at me😂
Thought I was trippin'
@@elainajwoo 😂😂😂
That’s actually what it’s called in some places
I could tell the older plaintiff was on drugs or use to be on drugs.
Probably still on drugs.
@@erikahardy121 Chill, I don’t think she’s on drugs anymore, former addicts still have some symptoms but she doesn’t seem like she’s currently using. The defendant is def using drugs and you can tell that at the end.
Yup she was nodded too..
Right while she calling her out
I know what you mean. I think speech therapy should be offered to ppl in rehab as well as cognitive skill exercises.
The defendant is high as a kite but when you make an inflammatory statement you better be prepared to prove it. If it was in the news then they should have been able to pull it up online.
I believe it's completely possible to be an addict AND a victim of abuse... I mean if I'm living in hell that's even more reason I'd get high out off my mind to escape reality. Come on now judge...
Right
Defendant was definitely on something.
Alpt of times they can hold onto the desk to appear more cognizant than they are.
Just because she was there for DV & that’s what she told the shelter, doesn’t mean she wasn’t also on drugs. People know how to work the system. A DV case might move along the process of finding a permanent home, a lot faster than a drug case in the shelter system. JM didn’t have to go off on the plaintiff like that.
then she should have brought proof.
The judge saw those crackish ways, just ashame to admit it after he jumped on mom for nothing. That's why she didn't get shit 😂😂 THE ENDING FUNNY AF🤣🤣🤣
If only the plaintiff had that news footage 🎥
The Plantiff mother should have never mentioned the Defendant drug use especially if you don't have any proof. If your on Judge Mathis you have to submit proof, I do agree the Defendant maybe be on something. BUT That is a serious accusation she made and not relevant to the case! The young man should've came to court by himself because he was well mannered and able to speak for himself.
Agreed. She dropped a bomb but had no evidence to back it. Explains why he was so upset. It’s not like he can just take the plaintiff’s word for it.
@@ReignThePain_ yeah what about his eyes! lol
Well if you google her you’ll see it was correct - so …
People bring up things about folks in this court to show a person’s character
@@torenee745 but you have to prove what you say.
WTF IS THE JUDGE DOING? DEFENDANT DOESN'T OWE FOR TRANSPORTATION COST
She didn't owe his ass anything. He tried to scam her
Okay so I’m glad you thinking the same thing as me. If he sold her a car with a lien on it, why is she responsible for his transportation needs? Maybe I need to watch again but I didn’t get that at all
@@UnFamess Incorrect. The order was that once he had paid her the judgement in full, she was to return the car to him. She delayed the return of the car by 3 weeks so at $75/week, she owes him $225.
White girl was high! Her stumbling and movements at the end told it all🤦🏾♀️
Why would you say white girl ? you can just say the defendant
🤣😂😂😂😂😂
@@perlaaa4333 cause all they see is color!
@@WhiteTheRealQueens but when it’s the other way around it’s a problem!!
I’m waiting on the Charleston White and Soulja Boy episode 😂😭😭
What on earth is going on with mum and son at the end, touching and holding each other like they are a couple 🤮
He had to stand there and listen to JM talk trash about his mom.
Glad to see I’m not the only one who thought Judge was tripping!!! I hate when he gets so caught up in trying to prove he’s right that he stops judging rationally.
Man why is she responsible for the repairs and transportation? If he hadn't tried to screw her over he wouldn't have had to spend that money.
The defendant is on drugs.
This is a crazy case !!
She was on some type of drugs.... maybe not the reason why she was there but yeah she was an addict
Judge Mathis...YOU DROPPED THE BALL ON THIS ONE😬
Went off on the black lady, and the other wobbly walking lady HIGH IN YOUR COURT gets a calm talking to😏
No he didn't...the "black lady" brought no evidence to court...only her big mouth. The Judge can't award judgements based on whose mouth is the loudest.. If the "black lady" would have brought some evidence to court, maybe she would have won. The "wobbly walking lady" brought her evidence, was respectful, and was not unruly enough to get thrown out of court. Given her lack of control, Its almost as if the "black lady" acted like she was the one high in court.
@@waldolydecker8118 what about on his eyesight. You’d have to be blind not to be able to tell she was high
@@judeak2442 - may have been, but its speculation, because her BEHAVIOR in court is what is paramount. The loud-mouth, talking-over-the-Judge plaintiff arguably acted more high than the defendant, who was calm and respectful throughout the case. If she was high, she handled it well in the court room and more importantly, that still doesn't prove the plaintiff's inflammatory allegation. You can't use that as "evidence"; the plaintiff has to bring proof of her charges, because plenty of people have been high before, but that don't make them what the plaintiff claimed.
If you make a claim that something is so well known and documented and that it was even "on the News" then you should be able to bring an official letterhead document, a video news clip, some internet website posting, or a newspaper clipping proving what you are talking about - you just can't bring your big mouth to court and think that's enough.
@@waldolydecker8118 This is sham court. Tv arbitration. So save the “court talk” for the real court/legal system, not this mockery.
@@judeak2442 - mockery your ass dude...the same principles and concepts oversee its operation...where do you think the basic rules and legal oversight for this program come from? Milton and Bradley? This ain't "CandyLand", clown...it might not be a full fledged outside court, but all the principles are related. Where do you think Mathis came directly from to do this show? Working in a bakery? Nope, Law School and sitting as Judge in an actual court. Not Mathis' fault that too much "court talk" brings back bad memories of you being locked up. He's got a job he's been doing for over 20 years and he's going to continue doing it, whether you think its a sham or not.
Prime example of why you shouldn't throw stones.👀👀👀👀👀
These people keep coming to this National TV show knowing how JM is...🤷🏽♀️
9:30 if it was in "perfect shape" then there wouldn't be a need to trade it in for another car!
I’m not even 30 seconds in and I’m WHEEZING she was smoking in a crack house and left her baby behind 😭😭😂
How is that funny?
@@Cassie.Jackson it’s not funny it’s HILARIOUS!!!! Also it was funny enough to mention in the fist 20 seconds
Those two ladies are the cutest crackheads I've ever saw
It’s the judges disrespect that puts me off watching and even when I do I can’t hear him in my head for too long-
The mother was str8 tripping. Very surprised judge Mathis didn't throw her out sooner and the son lucky he didn't lose the case over her over talking judge Mathis.
Judge said "get her outta here!" 😂😂😂
Black don’t crack unless you SMOKE it 😬
🤭😆😆😂
I hollered.🤣🤣🤣
@@kerrywhite5253 I couldn’t help myself 💀
All of these people are weirdos. This whole case was weird…from start to finish. They parents are scammers for sure and the girl may be on drugs but the plaintiff should have brought something to back up what she was saying. I honestly would have just sent them all away.
Me tooo
It was Doyle’s face after she stumbled 😭😂
An entire mess!!!
Judge Mathis is a loose cannon. I watched plenty of his court cases and he never cares for evidence of somebody being a drug addict. The woman is clearly on drugs, he’s acting like you can’t mark on paperwork domestic violence versus drugs. You’ll get more opportunities and help by putting that and get to keep your kids! He’s starting to rule off of ego and views.
He’s not trying to help anyone…
She isn’t on anything 😂
They all looked like little smurfs standing next to Doyle
Wow the defendant is obviously on drugs
LOL! The way Dolye was looking at the defendant at the end of the case!
He probably wanted to make sure that he didn't need to catch her if she fell
They were acting like lover’s in the end. What man hugs his mom like that?
Something is definitely up..
She wasn't supposed to tell people why a person is in a shelter. The workers and volunteers sign a form saying they will not go and tell the people they are helping business.
she wasn't a worker or volunteer. she was there for her own use.
Did she just say "You can go to the shelter?"😅😅
Doyle at the end looking at the defendant like…… yea she on sumn 😂😂😂
Wow! JM blew tf up at the plaintiff! Whew! I felt that
Looks like the mom and son is boyfriend and girlfriend at the End.. my opinion..
Man I scrolled so far down to find someone thinking the same thing I was. Something was definitely off there...👀
And at the end everything seem to make sense ! She definitely on drugs
I almost mistook the defendant for the plaintiff when she started explaining her side. Normally the plaintiff would give their side first 😅
Embarrassing
I understand why the judge got upset. Don't talk about what sonnet did when you've done the same or worst... she tried to paint a bad picture and it wasn't even directly related to why they were there
But turned out she was a druggy on the news. Just lack of evidence