“If you type anything in quotation marks on RUclips, people will flock to it immediately, without ever fact checking the quote.” - Genghis Vanderbilt III
2:00 In other words: "If reality contradicts my faith, then reality is wrong." What arrogance! Update: I am baffled by the number of people who automatically think I am speaking out against religion. You should only have an issue with this comment if reality contradicts your faith. If you faith aligns with reality, if there is *NO* contradiction, then there is no problem. If you feel that nothing can cause you to lose your faith then then you are saying that no evidence, no matter how compelling, will convince you that your faith is wrong. I have heard many many people make this proclamation, as if it is something to take pride in. It is not. There is *ALWAYS* a chance you might have made an error in your world view. If you have made a mistake, wouldn't you want to know? The fact you are troubled by my comment makes me think you know your faith contradicts reality. If you feel that way, why are you behaving as if it is reality that is wrong?
You defensive comment seems to demonstrate you already believe your faith contradicts reality. As a matter of fact, I do not disagree with what you say. I have never said that random processes lead to sand castles. But would you agree that random, mindless erosion can make something that looks like a sand castle? What I said was that if reality contradicts your faith, judging *REALITY* to be wrong is arrogant. A great many theists will say, "No matter what you say, no matter what evidence you present, I will still have faith." You you say this statement applies to you? If so, you would also agree, "If reality contradicts my faith reality is wrong." because you are saying that no matter what I encounter that shows you are wrong, you will never be convinced you are wrong. You defensive comment seems to demonstrate you already believe your faith contradicts reality.
*NON SEQUITUR. If I don't defend my religion, atheists say I can't. When I do, they complain no matter what. No way to please you, but it is not the intention.* How is the statement, ""If reality contradicts my faith, then reality is wrong." attacking your religion? Are you admitting that your faith contradicts reality? *"As a matter of fact, I do not disagree with what you say. I have never said that random processes lead to sand castles. But would you agree that random, mindless erosion can make something that looks like a sand castle?* How does the statements "If reality contradicts my faith, then reality is wrong." in *ANY WAY* address sand castles? However, to answer your question: Yes, natural processes can lead to structures that look like sand castles, along with many other forms. *You're moving the goalpost. Looks like is not the issue. It's about order level, period.* I'm not moving anything. At what level do you consider something to be a sand castle? Is this a face :^) or does it just look like a face? *And if you agreed with that order level of any sandcastle requiring intelligence, as SCIENCE SAYS ALL THE TIME IN EVERY BEACH WITHOUT EXCEPTION, then you would agree that greater order also necessarily was intended, but that would make you a theist, not an atheist, but you are an atheist, denying this science, closing your eyes to the patent truth.* First off, you are *ASSUMING* I am atheist. Nothing so far has told you explicitly that I am an atheist. It is irrelevant that it happens to be true. Science doesn't have beaches. It has *BRANCHES.* I think you have a gross misunderstanding of many aspects of science, and possibly even a weak grasp of English. But your grasp of English does not necessarily correlate to your intelligence, I will grant you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are not a native English speaker. That said, you need to learn some science before you can argue scientifically. Learn it from scientists, not from Creationists. Creationists distort and misrepresent science, especially evolution, saying things like "It is random:" It is not. *What I said was that if reality contradicts your faith, judging REALITY to be wrong is arrogant. A great many theists will say, "No matter what you say, no matter what evidence you present, I will still have faith." You you say this statement applies to you?* Sorry, That should have been "Would this apply to you?" My mistake. Thank you for clarifying your position. So, what evidence, if presented would convince you that God does not exist. *"You defensive comment seems to demonstrate you already believe your faith contradicts reality." Total NON SEQUITUR. No reality contradicts my faith. It is totally rational. Atheism is antithetical to the science of erosion, yet you remain an atheist despite admitting I am right about that science: "As a matter of fact, I do not disagree with what you say. I have never said that random processes lead to sand castles."* Okay, a "non sequitur" is a statement that does not fit the question. For example, this child's answer, "I like turtles" is a non sequitur. ruclips.net/video/CMNry4PE93Y/видео.html If reality doesn't contradict your faith, then my comment would not apply to it. The fact you felt moved to defend your faith when I made my original comment indicates you think it does. My comment said nothing at all about sand castles, evolution, or God. You read all of that into my comment on your own.
You have not proven anything, as your use of English is erratic and difficult to understand. What do you mean by "higher order (whatever)"? I mean no insult to you by pointing out your skills with English are poor. Hell, learning to speak English is a real bitch. Especially if you are a non-native speaker. English is an ugly, amalgam of many other languages and has no set rules that always apply. I think you should get a friend who is better at English than you are, explain what you are trying to say in your native language and have them translate for you. You mentioned sand castles, but the origin of sand castles is not mysterious.KIDS build sand castles. All you have done is spewed a shit load of nonsense that has nothing at all to do with defending faith against reality. If your faith does not contradict reality then there is no conflict. Your response makes it clear that you know your faith contradicts reality. That is the problem.
So far the faith wins (at least mainstream christian - not some sectarian stuff) , science changes views every 10 years. Please start looking seriously at the history of science..and how physics evolves toward the concepts known in many old religions for millenia..
Actually, science has not "changed" anything. It has become more detailed, and ideas that turn out to be wrong are sometimes abandoned but science has gotten more and more accurate as time goes on. As a matter of fact, physics has moved farther and farther away from concepts held by old religions. Not one single scientific fact has come from any old religion. Religious scholars have made this claim by pointing out random scriptures, but these scriptures do not say anything close to what is claimed. They are simply lying. The fact that science adapts as new discoveries are made means it is far more reliable that religion, which holds onto old ideas even after new evidence is discovered that refute those ideas. *YOU* are the one who needs to look seriously at the history of science. One classic example is Newtonian physics vs Relativity. In normal, every day conditions, Relativity makes the same predictions as Newton's theories. Only in extreme cases do we see any measurable difference. between them. There is nothing in the Bible (or any Holy Scripture) that was unknown at the time it was written. In those cases where the Bible mentions something scientific, it is nearly always wrong.
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Oh, after "yeshuaisnotjesus" you came with another t-rolling account "PhD" 😂 to tell us how the things really are because your expertise as a b-allet dancer (in real life) recommends you, Eldridge. So far we got from you that water contains molecules of oxygen, the solar circle is a think tank and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno. Anything else that you want to add?* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*Unforgettable one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
Just found this. As an engineer I see what Dawkins describes is key to good engineering practice. It's effie=cent and conservative design. . Anything else would d be sloppy. If it works why change it. Why reinvent the wheel?
I think of Nature as more like MacGyver. Nature just uses what is on the bench already. Parts can be repurposed a tiny bit, stretched, crushed, what have you. But Nature can’t order in new parts. The design that worked yesterday can be tweaked for today, and again tomorrow. Btw, that is why we carry around all the junk DNA that doesn’t do anything.
@@RandyWinn42 Abby Hafer explains a bit about “unintelligent design” in this video. ruclips.net/video/oWk3GK9iY5g/видео.html She has a book on the subject:The Not-So-Intelligent Designer: Why Evolution Explains the Human Body and Intelligent Design Does Not. Many critics of “origin of life” research are either like James Tour, a real organic chemist who is overwhelmed by the sheer i probability of DNA, or Ken Ham, a very badly educated person who likens DNA assembling like a windstorm putting together a jet plane from parts. Both Tour and Ham object to nature ever arriving accidentally at DNA. Sara Imari Walker and her colleagues look at the organic chemistry differently, looking at just what the organic chemistry has to do. Life as No One Knows It - The Physics of Life’s Emergence. London 2024 A solution to abiogenesis, the origin of life problem, is a long way away. It is not however a priori unsolvable.
Which efficient engineering designs include elements which add bulk and complexity but serve no function? None. Yet you see these features in the genomes of all species, highly conserved across closely related species. That is a key point that Dawkins makes.
*Simply beautiful from Anro Penzias, Nobel laureate in physics, co-discoverer of the cosmic microwave background:* _The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole_
*From Arno Penzias (1992):* _Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say "supernatural") plan._
@@DocReasonable *The fact that u don't understand ur native language confirms once again ur dense rtrdtion. After all u said that Britannica says that ostriches have no wings....*
@@Lorabundy-vi5uw See this video: *Donald Trump “I’m Not A Christian”.* In it, Trump very clearly says "I'M NOT CHRISTIAN." Thanks to my erudite colleague Scientist Flandiddlyanders for bringing this to our attention.
*Incredible example of absolute rtrdtion from the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover" - when I told him that virtually each cell of the human body contains a full copy of the whole genome, he was contradicting me, saying:* _No, there is NOT, dunce.... that's like saying there's a copy of the entire Encyclopedia Britannica inside every page of the Encyclopedia Britannica._
The idea of ”vestigial relics” of genetic information, also called “junk DNA”, that Dawkins meant to be the most important fact to prove evolution true, is not considered a fact anymore. When it was discovered in the 1970’s that most part of the human genome does not code for proteins, the rest of the DNA was soon declared to be useless left overs of random evolutionary processes. However, recent studies have shown that the non-protein-coding parts of DNA, do code for other necessary processes in living organisms. The study of these “junk” parts of the genetic information has already proved to be a gold mine of information, among other things about diseases and their treatment, and most certainly more is to follow. Richard Dawkins made himself a “disgrace”, to cite his own word, in perpetrating that unintelligent, unscientific idea that the origin of life can best be explained by declaring the most part of genetic information as junk. Today it sounds like a joke.
dfr *Absolutely beautiful and true one from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
Be forewarned. You could have your channel completely deleted without warning or opportunity of getting it back for repeating yourself as you’ve done in this feed if someone reports you…esp. you do it elsewhere as well.
@@biglongfish9253 He is not Elldridge, are you okay after all your trash was deleted on that other video? Why post about the existence of God after you said "I am not a Christian" - are you crazy?
*My last v1de0 shows how a 65 year old b-allet dancer insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno and then he denied it, lying shamelessly that I said all these....*
0:59 “… the only alternative is that the Intelligent Designer deliberately set out to deceive us in a most dubious way…” (might be a bit off with the quote) Or maybe the similarities in genomes shows a common Designer. This is not an issue at all for me as a Creationist. If I as a writer write a dozen books and you run my wording through a scanner and analyze it, I’m sure you could tell they all came from the same person. This is a really basic concept of creativity. The creator has a style they use.
@ 1) The Cosmological Argument, that the universe had a beginning. A. All things that have a beginning have a cause (premise based on induction) B. The universe had a beginning (known by observation) C. Conclusion: The universe had a cause. Since the universe includes space, time, and matter, the cause of it must be spaceless, timeless, and immaterial, all of which are characteristics of God. 2) Design of the universe and of life. A. Information always has a “coder.” B. DNA, precise (and vital) mathematical principles of the universe, etc. are forms of information. C. Information found in the universe has a “coder,” i.e. God. 3) Moral Law. A. All laws have a law-giver. B. Humanity shares a common Moral Law across time and space. C. Humanity has a Law-giver, i.e. God.
@TheHER7LD 1)You have absolutely no evidence that the cause in question is a god, much less yours. 2)a)"Information" is not defined in science, as such it means nothing. b) DNA is prone to replicate wrongly and has plenty of useless parts, mathematical and physical constants have values that extremely complex. A wise creator doesn't make things that are complicated or prone to mistake. So the complexity of the universe is an argument against an all-knowing deity. c) That's an unsupported claim. 3) Humanity doesn't share moral laws. To some cutting the hand of a thief is just to others it is barbaric. There is no uniformity of morality in the human species as a whole.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien Thanks for keeping it organized. 1) I provided a line of reasoning which you failed to acknowledge. All you said was “that’s not evidence.” I argued that the cause must possess some of the same characteristics which a theistic god possesses. I never said the God of the Bible except by natural bias, but I never argued for that God in particular here. 2) A) “Information” means nothing because it isn’t defined by science? Do things need to be defined by science to mean something now? B) Christianity has an answer to DNA replicating wrongly: sin nature and the fall of humanity. It’s the fault of the Creation, not the Creator. The medical community used to think the appendix is useless; we’ve learned better since then. A wise creator doesn’t make things that are complex? That’s completely unfounded and subjective. What level of complexity makes it too complex to warrant a wise creator? A car is pretty complex to me, so it must have no intelligent, wise creator, right? It also is prone to mistakes like people running into trees. That falls on the inventor, right? C) The conclusion logically follows the premises, actually. You haven’t shown otherwise. 3) There are variations in the carrying-out of justice, definitely. But what cultures agree on throughout history is that stealing is wrong. Imagine a society where a person is praised for betraying everyone closest to him or where deserters in warfare are given medals, for example. Think bigger. Humanity has always agreed with these basic moral principles. Even people that claim morality is subjective prove themselves wrong as soon as someone treats them unfairly, even though that other person can claim they have the moral right to trample on them.
@@TheHER7LD 1) You are wrong, I didn't fail to acknowledge your line of reasonning; I called out your conclusion which wasn't based on any argument. Not even the ones you made. You said _"Since the universe includes space, time, and matter, the cause of it must be spaceless, timeless, and immaterial"_ but that just isn't a necessity. For all we know, the cause could have material, present at some point in time and space. We don't know what was before the big bang, as such claiming that time, space and matter weren't things is an unsupported assertion. 2) a) Things need to be defined yes, and when used to determine a scientific conclusion they must be defined by science. In that case you attempted to make a scientific argument therefore science is required to define your terms, yes. b) That christian excuse is terrible and is in fact the fault of the creator for multiple reasons: -Adam and Eve couldn't have known that eating the fruit was wrong since they didn't know right from wrong, a just ruler doesn't punish someone for doing something they absolutely couldn't have known was bad. -God is supposed omniscient, therefore he knew that humans would eat the forbidden fruit yet he let the setup the same way knowing what was to happen. -According to the story Adam and Eve ate the fruit, but I didn't. Therefore in punishing me God is punishing the innocent; the characteristic of a tyrant. Moreover, your example of the appendix is just that, an example. I'm speaking about parts of DNA that do not code, about organs that do not do anything at all such muscles to move your ears. They're too small to do anything worthwile with it that could help, and that is if you possess them which many people do not and yet they have absolutely no trouble living. Also, you asked _"What level of complexity makes it too complex to warrant a wise creator?"_, the answer is "when there are useless part and it can make mistakes, in other words when it's needlessly complex". Your comparisson with the car is bad for a few reasons: -Yes, when it is the car that fails (not the driver) then the car maker is put to blame. -The car doesn't have any useless part, they are not all required to drive but perhaps help the driver be more comfortable. In any case, there isn't a part that is there just to be there. c) I, in fact, did. Since I've shown that "information" is meaningless, stating that information always has a coder is also meaningless. As for the premise b) I perfectly said that needless complexity doesn't arise from intelligence. So I critized both of your arguments correctly.
kf6 *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"2ndchookie"/"davidbanner" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
*Absolutely beautiful and true one from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
*Exceptionally beautiful and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*Unforgettable and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*Happy Birthday, Sir Isaac Newton! I still remember his lovely words:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
@@jacoblehrer4198 True and that happened to all who thought it opportune to bring the light to religion. Fundies really believe that their historical and methodical coercion is a sign of devotion rather than survival. Well, if there's one thing one can't blame a fundie of, it's knowing the actual history of religion rather than the fabricated one.
@@JZsBFF *R u trying to say that ur beliefs that u come from bacteria and that nature can create information and codes make u superior to Newton, bud?*
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth, OR, In the beginning, a mindless nothing created everything, including all life and everything for that life to survive and prosper. I'll choose an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent God, the Creator, every time.
jhy *From Arno Penzias, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who codiscovered the cosmic microwave background radiation:* _The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole._
I don't think Dawkins understands that the same fact is also evidence for creation. It's all about the philosophy you use to interpret what common genetic code means... ruclips.net/video/XzPxrT4ULUM/видео.html
@@garrettpapit Exactly. Look at the computer code for Windows 1-10. You'll see a consistent pattern of development in complexity. Right? But only an idiot would deny "intelligent design" and say it evolved.
@@garrettpapit I don't think it's evidence for the creation story. You could say that an intelligent being turned it all loose and let it evolve, but that each species was created independently, in six days, given the clear story written in life's genes? I don't see it.
*True and beautiful from Psalm 72:* _Praise be to YHWH, the God of Israel, who alone does marvelous deeds._ _Praise be to his glorious name forever; may the whole earth be filled with his glory._
Funny that you would post these 150 psalms 150 times since you said "I am not a Christian" Not a true believer, just a "sugar" Christian? Who but a Christian would posts psalms on a Dawkins video?
"I am not a Christian" you said, so were you lying then or are you lying now? Why post to the glory of YHWH when you don't believe in him? Are you crazy?
christians believe god cloned himself by raping an under age bride cuckolding her honest and just husband so he could torture that clone to convince himself not to torture the rest of us for a sin we werent alive to commit that involves a trans woman , made from a mans body part, eating an apple while talking to a snake. because he loves us... and you wonder why we think you people are insane..
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t On the contrary, when Kelvin asserted that "heavier than air flying machines are impossible" I had to laugh. Haven't you flown in a jet yet? He got stuff wrong about atheism too.
*I really do love DNA. Your amazingly complex and intelligent organism is built following the instructions written on a piece of information whose volume is 80 times smaller than the one of a single living cell. DNA a masterpiece and the undeniable evidence for an intelligent creator.*
@@2ndchookie919 *How would you know that, ballet dancer andr-ew "ergonomover" eld-ridge? Because your only link with science is the username "scientist flanders" used for another trolling account of yours.*
@@2ndchookie919 *How would you know that, ballet dancer andr-ew "ergonomover" eld-ridge? Because your only link with science is the username "scientist flanders" used for another trolling account of yours.*
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t So, .. you're saying that genetic deformities and debilitating diseases are 'not' a flaw and that God is a cruel and inhumane a-h@le?? ~~ Buwahahahahahaha!
@@2ndchookie919 *By saying "flaws", you acknowledge an intelligent creator, because natural processes don't produce flaws, ballet dancer and-rew "ergonomover" eldr-idge.*
drq *RIP evolution! From live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😂😂😂😂
*Simply beautiful and deep one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
*Eldridge from his trolling account "ergonomover":* _No one insisted ostriches have no wings_ *Eldridge in the same thread, about my v1de0:* _I watched about all of it_ *Now watch the v3de0 "ergonomover and the ostrich" and tell me that this r-rd doesn't lie...* 😂😂😂😂
*Take the 7-8 pieces of the simplest puzzle, bring them wherever you want on this planet, shuffle them and let any natural force act upon them. It will never fit the pieces together, but id-iots are dreaming that it can put together many billions of dynamic parts, each with its own set of functions, all interconnected.*
Nature put together nearly 4 billion pieces of the biodiversity of species puzzle. You, however, are unable to put two facts together. You are more like the 5 major extinction events that destroyed most -braincells- species over and over.
@@ergonomover *After the production line for ur computer is intelligently put in place, you can say that natural processes involved in this process are assembling it, but no, rtrd, it is the human mind that made it possible. For once in your life you should be less rtrded and show that nature can do things starting from scratch.*
Computers are not biological entities that transmit genetic code. Your analogy is bogus. The human mind is a product of Darwin's mill of natural selection. If "Scratch" is absolute nothingness, it might never have existed. You should learn some science for once in your life.@@biglongfish9253
Pretending everyone is me, who supposedly texts 22 hours a day between leaps and pirouettes shows everyone your insanity and impotence in dealing with rational arguments, that's why you post so many emojis and puerile insults.@@biglongfish9253
kas *From Arno Penzias, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who codiscovered the cosmic microwave background radiation:* _The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole._
More absurdity and violence from the Book of Morals: 'And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and *when they awoke early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses.* 2 Kings 19:35
@@DocReasonable *Let me quote you, Eldridge:* _If someone said 'press this button and Gustard dxxx' I would have no hesitation in pressing that button. Repeatedly._
_How great are your works, YHWH, how profound your thoughts!_ _Senseless people do not know, fools do not understand,_ _that though the wicked spring up like grass and all evildoers flourish, they will be destroyed forever._ *Psalm 92*
"I am not a Christian" you said, so were you lying then or are you lying now? Why post to the glory of YHWH when you don't believe in him? Are you crazy?
hyh *Absolutely beautiful and true from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
Actually you did not study Jesus's life. You studied second hand accounts of the life of a character called Jesus. Each account different from the other. The truth is that not one person who wrote a single word about Jesus claimed to have met him in person!
Saying similarities automatically prove ancestry is the most ridiculous lack of good judgement I wouldn't expect from a scientist what a stupid thing to say please tell me you also think that way
Mae Culpa: Yes I did say that Dawkins cannot answer, because Dawkins never answers, regardless of the competence of his interviewers, he always rides above reality, like a man thinking a snow-drift is reality, while inserting infantile supersitions to fit in with the persona he has conned his sycophants into believing they are seeing who he is…..?
siu *Happy Birthday, Sir Isaac Newton! I still remember his lovely words:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him._
*An example of acute rtrdation, I am quoting the 65-year-old b-allet dancer A-n-drew Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"mntllyderanged"/"flandiddlyandersFRS":* _Dropped from 250,000 to 237,000. That's a drop of -23,000. Or an increase of 23,000 if you want to be pedantic._ 😂😂😂😂😂
*Simply beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
njj *Absolutely beautiful and true one from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
yeq *The d-mbest and the most evil troll you could encounter is the 66 year old b-allet dancer A-n-d-rew Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"puppetmaster"/"AI-CREATARD", who insisted that ostriches have no wings (see the v6de0 "ergonomover and the ostrich").*
*Very beautiful and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*Absolutely beautiful and true from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
So, you agree, ... these are your _Troll accounts!_ , .... correct? ~~ Buwahahahahahahahahahahaha! biglongfish9253 atheism-themoststupidrelig8802 user-tu1co9xl1k atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻 Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
@Julian Borges, Book Flip might be talking about this idea: "Homology involves the theory that macroevolutionary relationships can be proven by the similarity in the anatomy and physiology of different animals. Since Darwin, homology has been cited in textbooks as a major proof for evolution. A review of the literature on homology indicates that the theory does not provide evidence for evolutionary naturalism, and that the common examples of homology can be better explained by Creation. Furthermore, increased knowledge about the genetic and molecular basis of life has revealed many major exceptions and contradictions to the theory which, as a result, have largely negated homology as a proof of evolution."
@@isaacharvey "A review of the literature on homology " So - Not scientific-method derived then. Ok. It's funny, the claim is made as if supported by scientific evidence..
A Human construction company often uses the same bricks, windows, doors, roofing materials, etc., to construct schools, hospitals, office buildings, condos or hotels. They often use the same or similar blueprint designs for different buildings. This doesn't mean that these buildings erected themselves or "evolved" from whirling dust devils over millions of years.
@timdavis7845 Are U creatards EVER going to stop making these laughable fallacious analogies?? Paintings, buildings, cars etc have to be a constructed using raw materials. And yet you claim that the entire universe and each animal species magically appeared FROM NOTHING out of thin air. So how is that a valid comparison?
@@EvolutionIsSelfEvident I do not deny, that there are genetic similarities between living organisms. I mean to point out, that among the myriad organisms - these genetic similarities suggest a common Intelligent Designer who used the same "palette" and "blue prints" in His creative designs. I cannot believe, that EVERYTHING was created by NOBODY out of NOTHING. The "Laws of Nature" are too predictable and too well structured to be randomly occurring phenomena.
*Believing in Aronra's cult goes hand in hand with rtrdation. As an example I am quoting the 65-year-old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"mntllyderanged"/"flandiddlyandersFRS":* _Dropped from 250,000 to 237,000. That's a drop of -23,000. Or an increase of 23,000 if you want to be pedantic._ 😂😂😂😂😂
huy *Quoting again Eldridge, from his account "docreasonable":* _As a male ballet dancer, I have r-eady a-ccess to many of the most beautiful women in the world_
If only I were docreasonable, you wouldn't be lying. Do you have wet dreams about all those beautiful women I worked with for decades? Going on nearly 2 years and you are still obsessed with it, what's wrong, you can't get a date? Your nutsack refuses to descend properly? I'm afraid your love/hate relationship with an old male dancer isn't helping in that department. Maybe time for you to find a new hobby.
@@changgi-tn4uy They're clear evidence that you cannot tell people apart, have paranoid delusions and ill-will. You got it wrong, I use ONE account, try to grow up.
@@ergonomover *U mean both u and "docreasonable" r b-allet dancers, oth insists that ostriches have no wings, both r rtrdd and both are trolling the same sites?*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 No, as I keep insisting, we are 2 different people and neither of us were ever a "b-allet" dancer. Is that really your most potent homophobic slur, repetitive rtrd?
@@yeshuaisjoshua LUCA is a postulated, unproven being. In no way is that anything remotely resembling proof. DNA being similar among all life makes sense to me. I don't need some magic common ancestor to explain it. If an intelligent mind is behind the universe and everything in it, it would logically follow that all life would be made from similar material, using similar means. Theorize all the ancient beings you want. We still can't demonstrate ONE example of genetic mutation resulting in an addition of information. That would be necessary for this imaginary LUCA to become all other life forms, to include fungi and plants. "Proof"...
@@gowsif_dnb Like the mutation that lets me drink milk? Or new one they found a mutation in the LRP5 gene can also cause an uncommon disorder in which bone density is greatly increased.
hyu *Beautiful, from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
@@Acrocanthosaurus It is a shame the religious folk miss out on all the other topics Hitchens speaks about. I recently watched his talks about George Orwell. Incredible things to think about that are very relevant in 2023.
@@GungaLaGunga Philosopher here. Much harder to argue with. I've yet to be impressed with anything Hitchens has ever said but his thoughts on Orwell might be interesting.
*Quoting the 65 year old rtrd ballet dancer A. Eldridge (aka "creationists-arecrybabies", "flandiddlyanders") from his account "docreasonable"* _OK fine! I'll admit that captainatheist9855 is my trolling account (it's where I make rtrded comments)_ *The sad truth is that all his comments from all his trolling accounts are rtrded....* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@ergonomover : you are a pathetic lost soul, with a rudimentary childish understanding, Those tiny communities are incapable of surviving today, while surrounded by stability, so you can imagine the carnage that would have taking place then? What about the establishment of universities and factories making toilet bowls, do you think those tiny comitie s could have done that? Groe up and get real…..and Fk off, I’m tired of talking to children and Dawkin’s made up names…..go away you shallow idiot…
gyh *RIP evolution! From live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😂😂😂😂
hgy *Another example of inhuman ridiculousness with Eldridge praising himself from his account "docreasonable":* _Mr Ergonomover is a dapper-looking chap, full of personality, wry humour, wit and wisdom - with a million fascinating life stories to tell_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
lao *RIP evolution: from live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😅😅😅😅😅
Did you read the Live Science report yet? The experts say evolution theory is not overturned or bothered at all by the new discovery which will lead to healthier crops and better cancer medicine. Thanks for reminding everyone of the strength and usefulness of evolution theory. Can you remind us which god requires you to deny settled science?
Actually beautiful one for Einstein, that quotes denounces the cults like the one Larsen is apart of. He doesn't know it since it requires to understand basic English.
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 No because "the the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle" clearly refers to a religion they left, yours to be precise.
@@lorann-ut5cq The "chains" are a reference to theism. What theism are you chained to? You said last month "I am not a Christian" so are you a Muslim or perhaps a liar? Why so many fake accounts, lorann or should I say lora, loran or Lorabundy? Doran, Dorian, Mulan, moran and 4 that say "stupidreligion"?
Or intelligent design. All Dawkins hopes to achieve is steer people to believe they were created for nothing into a world which means nothing and die to nothing. To be no more important than a bug or a weed. So very sad.
"There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has a responsibility to give your life meaning and point… The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful, as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it." --Dawkins Bugs and weeds do not have our huge, evolved brains with higher functions. We are going to use them, even if you don't use yours.
Why do you need to be the creation of a supernatural being to find meaning in your life ? I think making the belief that you are the special creation of supernatural entities a prerequisite to finding meaning , joy or just contentment in existence to be very sad .
@@jonnawyatt The Creation story says Creation was made perfect! It was Man's Free Will to choose that introduced the flaw into the World. No other creature has it... they are ruled by their instinct to survive...
@@justinjewell8329 People don't NEED to be created, but many feel they were! People find meaning in their lives no matter if they believe in God or not. And who says God is Supernatural? Is that your understanding?
*Beautiful example of severe rtrdtion, the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"mtllyderanged" said this "An entire human digitized genome = 3.436687 Gb. My computer could hold 330 of them" and then "That's an argument for the superi0rity of humans over god". Was he right, because unlike his computer, a human body holds.....30 trillion copies of a genome!!!!!!* 😂😂😂 😂😂😂 😂😂😂
nbj *RIP evolution: from live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😅😅😅😅😅
frt *RIP evolution! From live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😂😂😂😂
*A nice example of incredible rtrdation, quoting the 65-year-old dancer A. Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"FlandiddlyandersFRS"/"mntllyrtrded", the most c-rr-tt in ous troll of the century:* *he:* _An entire human digitized genome = 3.436687 Gb. My computer could hold 330 of them._ *he again:* _That's an argument for the superi0rity of humans over god_ *Right, because unlike his computer, a human body holds.....30 trillion copies of a genome!!!!!!* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
hahahahah WOW.. i read through all these comments and i see nothing but baffoons who lack any intelligence and critical thinking. None of you have taken the time to think before you type. All of you sound like you suffer from a mental disorder known as atheism.
*Read Bhagvat Gita 🙏 spoken by God.* *Life and consciousness cannot be created by a combination of material elements DNA etc because all material elements are themselves lifeless and devoid of consciousness. The effect must exist in the cause itself. Life and Matter are two separate distinct entities. The soul is a conscious person. The material body is the soul's covering. Life as we see it on Earth is a soul covered by a material body. Life does not evolve from matter. Life is a separate entity.*
*Absolutely beautiful, Aronra's cult is so prominent that the b-allet dancer a-nd-rew Eldridge made an army of t-rolling accounts and has to t-roll and to carry imaginary dialogs to them non-stop.* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*A beautiful one from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
So, .. you don't provide the _'entire'_ quote!! ~ Once again, .. LYING FOR GOD ~ Sighhhhhh! _"It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, →a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means← to a very, very high level of technology- and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. And I suppose it's possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer."_
*Beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
nmki *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"yeshuaisjoshua"/"dougwalker"/"AI-CREATARD" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
*Absolutely beautiful, quoting the ballet dancer A-ndrew Eldridge, the most c-rr-tt in ous troll of the century:* *he:* _An entire human digitized genome = 3.436687 Gb. My computer could hold 330 of them._ *he again:* _That's an argument for the superi0rity of humans over god_ *Right, because unlike his computer, a human body holds.....30 trillion copies of a genome!!!!!!* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You think beautiful things come from "c-rr-tt in ous" trolls? "He again:" no, not me, it was someone else. Imagine that all the people telling you they are not me are right - will Jesus survive yet another scandal? Nice how you were able to run other creationists off videos, Adrian Moire and Hwd71 hated your lack of respect.
*Simply beautiful and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
dsar *The 65 year old b-allet dancer A-n-d-re-w Eldridge ( (aka "ergonomover"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"docreasonable"/"yeshuaisjoshua"), the one who insisted that ostriches have no wings, was screaming that no one has refuted the "fact" of Dawkins (this "fact" being actually a fallacy "similarites = inheritance"), but look, Dawkins himself did it:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Aronra is aligned with the global scientific community and wields facts and evidence - did your putzy interview with him hurt you so badly you never got over it? Poor boy!
@@ergonomover *What does Aronra have to do with science. As much as u, the one who insisted that there is a single copy of the genome in the human body have to do with science.*
ghu *RIP evolution: from live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😅😅😅😅😅
kingdom of god come NOT by outward observation... kingdom of god is within you it's allegory; heaven=head; earth=body; new heaven=renewed mind; new earth=renewed strength; new jersualem=(city of) peace inside... behold I show you a mystery, we shall not all sleep; corruption shall put on incorruption, mortality shall put on immortality; I shall quicken (bring to life) your mortal bodies; the whole creation awaits in earnest expectation for the manifestation of the SONS of god!!!
*God kills half a million of his own chosen people... no explanation given* "God smote Jeroboam and all Israel before Abijah and Judah. And the children of Israel fled before Judah: and God delivered them into their hand. And Abijah and his people slew them with a great slaughter: so there fell down slain of Israel five hundred thousand chosen men." 2 Chronicles 13:15-17
Einstein wrote, "I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him." He also stated, "I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own - a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms." Einstein was one of the most intelligent men to ever live, and he's nailed it here. Only buffoons would disagree with his views on the spiteful Abrahamic dogmas.
@@biglongfish9253 Albert Einstein, 1954, the year before his death AND his last word on this subject: “The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can change this”. Einstein, who died the following year aged 76, did not spare Judaism from his criticism, believing Jewish people were in no way “chosen” by God. He wrote: “For me the Jewish religion like all others is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people.”
similarities in DNA are not evidence of common ancestry, but rather evidence of a common designer. The idea is that a Creator, knowing how to create life efficiently, could have used a similar genetic blueprint for different creatures to fulfill various roles in nature. For example, the same fundamental genetic mechanisms might be used across species because they were designed with similar principles in mind. Even a high schooler can refute this atheist
I agree, but evolutionists will say that it leads to a common ancestor. Not sure if they can refute the fact that genetic material can never be created, only lost, and that mutations are only harmful. If someone comes along to prove me wrong, then let everyone else see it cause I don't have comment notifications on.
@@ethanton7074 You're just plain wrong as genetic material can in fact be created, wouldn't be something you would get wrong if you studied mutations just a tiny bit but you got it wrong anyway.
*The argument "similarities=inheritance" is a fallacy good only for rtrds like the troll who approached u from 3 trolling accounts, see v3de0s like "ergonomover and the ostrich" if u want to know more about him.*
@atheism-moststupidreligion The only thing you learn from that video is how insane you are Larsen. And your incredulity about similarities is of no concern to anyone.
dff *Absolutely beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ *And we have the confirmation seeing the behavior of the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"* 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I keep pointing out your lies, incivilities, privacy violations, cyberstalking, Ad hominem attacks and other fallacies while posting quotes by famous thinkers. I realize you hate free-thought, skeptcism, critical thinking, good manners and logic, as you prove every day.
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 you are such a beach that you don't even have a valid point or a clean head all you do is speak you fallacy to other when others say oh that's not true because what we observe in the world is different then you just sully their name coz even you don't know what to talk. Mooooooron😂😂😂
Well the way you type is certainly insane. I hope that there is a god up there. And that there is an afterlife. But when you get up there it's the Mormon god so you still end up being wrong. From my perspective you'll never know. It'll just be lights out and you'll never have known just how ignorant you have been. That's sad I want you to know.
juh *Quoting again Eldridge, from his account "docreasonable":* _As a male ballet dancer, I have r-eady a-ccess to many of the most beautiful women in the world_
"Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is of the same kind as the intolerance of the religious fanatics and comes from the same source." -Einstein, same dialogue
@@LoAssistidor-uk6qj *Just quoting wikipedia:* _According to biographer Walter Isaacson, Einstein was more inclined to denigrate atheists than religious people_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@LoAssistidor-uk6qj “I received your letter of June 10th. I have never talked to a Jesuit priest in my life and I am astonished by the audacity to tell such lies about me. From the viewpoint of a Jesuit priest I am, of course, and have always been an atheist." --Einstein, 1945 letter to Raner
@@LoAssistidor-uk6qj A year and three and a half months before his death, Einstein wrote: "The word God is for me nothing but the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of venerable but still rather primitive legends. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change anything about this. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstition. I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them. "
A bishop, a parson, a rabbi, a vicar, a pastor, an imam and the pope walk into a bar. The pope says, 'Well, let's compare our recent pedo adventures... I'll go first!'
And yet it doesn't occur to you that repeating a debunked lie makes you the fanatic. If you spend half the time you use to make all your alternate accounts into actually thinking, you would have understood that.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Repeating l-ies is what u do (and actually the ONLY thing u do all day long) , b-allet dancer Eldridge. Me repeating the truth is fine, sorry that truth hurts u.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 For that I would have to lie and you would have to tell the truth. Considering that you direct your comments to the wrong person that is far from being what happens.
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Let's see : -You claim I am Mr. Eldrige. You can't prove it so debunked by lack of evidence. That also means that anything you say is about me when it's about Mr. Eldrige is also a lie. -You say that Einstein was mocking atheists when the quote shows he is denouncing religion. That one, you were debunked by doc reasonable. -You say that humans have symmetrical eyes, debunked by merely looking at humans. Are you so alone that you never met anyone? Did you never see yourself in a glass? At the surface of water? And I didn't mention all your appeal to authority fallacies!
*Very beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
“If you type anything in quotation marks on RUclips, people will flock to it immediately, without ever fact checking the quote.” - Genghis Vanderbilt III
Yer funny.
I've read that somewhere else and can confirm it's true.
@@onafehts - You sound just like Dawkins 😉
I was actually there when Genghis said that, but because he didn't use quotation marks, I didn't believe him. Now I just feel stupid.
@@paulakennedy2085 - The OP was quite insightful. It made coming to this [absurd] video worthwhile.
2:00 In other words: "If reality contradicts my faith, then reality is wrong."
What arrogance!
Update: I am baffled by the number of people who automatically think I am speaking out against religion. You should only have an issue with this comment if reality contradicts your faith. If you faith aligns with reality, if there is *NO* contradiction, then there is no problem.
If you feel that nothing can cause you to lose your faith then then you are saying that no evidence, no matter how compelling, will convince you that your faith is wrong.
I have heard many many people make this proclamation, as if it is something to take pride in. It is not. There is *ALWAYS* a chance you might have made an error in your world view. If you have made a mistake, wouldn't you want to know?
The fact you are troubled by my comment makes me think you know your faith contradicts reality. If you feel that way, why are you behaving as if it is reality that is wrong?
You defensive comment seems to demonstrate you already believe your faith contradicts reality.
As a matter of fact, I do not disagree with what you say. I have never said that random processes lead to sand castles.
But would you agree that random, mindless erosion can make something that looks like a sand castle?
What I said was that if reality contradicts your faith, judging *REALITY* to be wrong is arrogant.
A great many theists will say, "No matter what you say, no matter what evidence you present, I will still have faith."
You you say this statement applies to you?
If so, you would also agree, "If reality contradicts my faith reality is wrong." because you are saying that no matter what I encounter that shows you are wrong, you will never be convinced you are wrong.
You defensive comment seems to demonstrate you already believe your faith contradicts reality.
*NON SEQUITUR. If I don't defend my religion, atheists say I can't. When I do, they complain no matter what. No way to please you, but it is not the intention.*
How is the statement, ""If reality contradicts my faith, then reality is wrong." attacking your religion? Are you admitting that your faith contradicts reality?
*"As a matter of fact, I do not disagree with what you say. I have never said that random processes lead to sand castles.
But would you agree that random, mindless erosion can make something that looks like a sand castle?*
How does the statements "If reality contradicts my faith, then reality is wrong." in *ANY WAY* address sand castles? However, to answer your question: Yes, natural processes can lead to structures that look like sand castles, along with many other forms.
*You're moving the goalpost. Looks like is not the issue. It's about order level, period.*
I'm not moving anything. At what level do you consider something to be a sand castle? Is this a face :^) or does it just look like a face?
*And if you agreed with that order level of any sandcastle requiring intelligence, as SCIENCE SAYS ALL THE TIME IN EVERY BEACH WITHOUT EXCEPTION, then you would agree that greater order also necessarily was intended, but that would make you a theist, not an atheist, but you are an atheist, denying this science, closing your eyes to the patent truth.*
First off, you are *ASSUMING* I am atheist. Nothing so far has told you explicitly that I am an atheist. It is irrelevant that it happens to be true.
Science doesn't have beaches. It has *BRANCHES.* I think you have a gross misunderstanding of many aspects of science, and possibly even a weak grasp of English. But your grasp of English does not necessarily correlate to your intelligence, I will grant you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are not a native English speaker.
That said, you need to learn some science before you can argue scientifically. Learn it from scientists, not from Creationists. Creationists distort and misrepresent science, especially evolution, saying things like "It is random:" It is not.
*What I said was that if reality contradicts your faith, judging REALITY to be wrong is arrogant.
A great many theists will say, "No matter what you say, no matter what evidence you present, I will still have faith."
You you say this statement applies to you?*
Sorry, That should have been "Would this apply to you?" My mistake. Thank you for clarifying your position.
So, what evidence, if presented would convince you that God does not exist.
*"You defensive comment seems to demonstrate you already believe your faith contradicts reality."
Total NON SEQUITUR. No reality contradicts my faith. It is totally rational. Atheism is antithetical to the science of erosion, yet you remain an atheist despite admitting I am right about that science: "As a matter of fact, I do not disagree with what you say. I have never said that random processes lead to sand castles."*
Okay, a "non sequitur" is a statement that does not fit the question. For example, this child's answer, "I like turtles" is a non sequitur.
ruclips.net/video/CMNry4PE93Y/видео.html
If reality doesn't contradict your faith, then my comment would not apply to it.
The fact you felt moved to defend your faith when I made my original comment indicates you think it does.
My comment said nothing at all about sand castles, evolution, or God. You read all of that into my comment on your own.
You have not proven anything, as your use of English is erratic and difficult to understand.
What do you mean by "higher order (whatever)"?
I mean no insult to you by pointing out your skills with English are poor. Hell, learning to speak English is a real bitch. Especially if you are a non-native speaker. English is an ugly, amalgam of many other languages and has no set rules that always apply. I think you should get a friend who is better at English than you are, explain what you are trying to say in your native language and have them translate for you.
You mentioned sand castles, but the origin of sand castles is not mysterious.KIDS build sand castles.
All you have done is spewed a shit load of nonsense that has nothing at all to do with defending faith against reality.
If your faith does not contradict reality then there is no conflict. Your response makes it clear that you know your faith contradicts reality. That is the problem.
So far the faith wins (at least mainstream christian - not some sectarian stuff) , science changes views every 10 years. Please start looking seriously at the history of science..and how physics evolves toward the concepts known in many old religions for millenia..
Actually, science has not "changed" anything. It has become more detailed, and ideas that turn out to be wrong are sometimes abandoned but science has gotten more and more accurate as time goes on.
As a matter of fact, physics has moved farther and farther away from concepts held by old religions.
Not one single scientific fact has come from any old religion. Religious scholars have made this claim by pointing out random scriptures, but these scriptures do not say anything close to what is claimed. They are simply lying.
The fact that science adapts as new discoveries are made means it is far more reliable that religion, which holds onto old ideas even after new evidence is discovered that refute those ideas.
*YOU* are the one who needs to look seriously at the history of science.
One classic example is Newtonian physics vs Relativity. In normal, every day conditions, Relativity makes the same predictions as Newton's theories. Only in extreme cases do we see any measurable difference. between them.
There is nothing in the Bible (or any Holy Scripture) that was unknown at the time it was written. In those cases where the Bible mentions something scientific, it is nearly always wrong.
The DNA and gene codes of plants and animals look so similar and yet they produce so vastly different organisms.
Therefore trying to find a "common" ancestor based on DNA (aka INFORMATION) similarities is just a s-tup id idea.
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t
LUCA.
@@YeshuaisnotJesus *This we were trying to explain to you, Eldridge. There cannot be any LUCA. Sorry if we were too subtle for your intellect.*
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t Screeching "nuh uh" won't change reality, little troll.
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Oh, after "yeshuaisnotjesus" you came with another t-rolling account "PhD" 😂 to tell us how the things really are because your expertise as a b-allet dancer (in real life) recommends you, Eldridge. So far we got from you that water contains molecules of oxygen, the solar circle is a think tank and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno. Anything else that you want to add?* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*Unforgettable one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
Just found this. As an engineer I see what Dawkins describes is key to good engineering practice. It's effie=cent and conservative design. . Anything else would d be sloppy. If it works why change it. Why reinvent the wheel?
I think of Nature as more like MacGyver. Nature just uses what is on the bench already. Parts can be repurposed a tiny bit, stretched, crushed, what have you. But Nature can’t order in new parts. The design that worked yesterday can be tweaked for today, and again tomorrow.
Btw, that is why we carry around all the junk DNA that doesn’t do anything.
Why would DNA be "efficiently" designed but the human eye be inefficiently designed?
@@RandyWinn42 Abby Hafer explains a bit about “unintelligent design” in this video.
ruclips.net/video/oWk3GK9iY5g/видео.html
She has a book on the subject:The Not-So-Intelligent Designer: Why Evolution Explains the Human Body and Intelligent Design Does Not.
Many critics of “origin of life” research are either like James Tour, a real organic chemist who is overwhelmed by the sheer i probability of DNA, or Ken Ham, a very badly educated person who likens DNA assembling like a windstorm putting together a jet plane from parts. Both Tour and Ham object to nature ever arriving accidentally at DNA.
Sara Imari Walker and her colleagues look at the organic chemistry differently, looking at just what the organic chemistry has to do.
Life as No One Knows It - The Physics of Life’s Emergence. London 2024
A solution to abiogenesis, the origin of life problem, is a long way away. It is not however a priori unsolvable.
@@RandyWinn42 Designed for purpose
Which efficient engineering designs include elements which add bulk and complexity but serve no function? None. Yet you see these features in the genomes of all species, highly conserved across closely related species. That is a key point that Dawkins makes.
Can any creationist 'prove' that Zeus does not exist?
*Simply beautiful from Anro Penzias, Nobel laureate in physics, co-discoverer of the cosmic microwave background:*
_The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole_
*From Arno Penzias (1992):* _Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say "supernatural") plan._
Then 2 years later he said, *“The thing I wrestle with at all times is the reality of god.” Dr Penzias in 1994.*
@@DocReasonable *The fact that u don't understand ur native language confirms once again ur dense rtrdtion. After all u said that Britannica says that ostriches have no wings....*
@@Lorabundy-vi5uw Screaming about ostriches because U've been beaten.... as usual.
@@DocReasonable *After you told us that ostriches have no wings, did you claim from Guinness your prize for the most rtrdd troll of this planet?*
@@Lorabundy-vi5uw See this video: *Donald Trump “I’m Not A Christian”.* In it, Trump very clearly says "I'M NOT CHRISTIAN."
Thanks to my erudite colleague Scientist Flandiddlyanders for bringing this to our attention.
*Internet-the place where people come to l-augh at the c-r1c-ture A-n-d-rew Eldridge "ergonomover".*
People laugh with me at you, posting psalms all day when you said "I am not a Christian".
@@ergonomover *U have serious m-ntal issues, Eldridge.*
@@ergonomover
True. 👏🤝
@@gunnybear-fw6of
You're obviously projecting.
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Oh, u r again carrying imaginary dialogs to ur own trolling accounts....U have serious m-ntal issues, Eldridge.*
*Incredible example of absolute rtrdtion from the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover" - when I told him that virtually each cell of the human body contains a full copy of the whole genome, he was contradicting me, saying:*
_No, there is NOT, dunce.... that's like saying there's a copy of the entire Encyclopedia Britannica inside every page of the Encyclopedia Britannica._
Take your meds bro. Seriously.
@@case8837 *Why should I take meds, my r-trded bro?*
I really like how he condensed all that into one sentence
Even though it is a false premise. You can look at the similarities and say it points to a common creator just as easily.
@@vistuscaine you didn't get the video.
The idea of ”vestigial relics” of genetic information, also called “junk DNA”, that Dawkins meant to be the most important fact to prove evolution true, is not considered a fact anymore. When it was discovered in the 1970’s that most part of the human genome does not code for proteins, the rest of the DNA was soon declared to be useless left overs of random evolutionary processes. However, recent studies have shown that the non-protein-coding parts of DNA, do code for other necessary processes in living organisms. The study of these “junk” parts of the genetic information has already proved to be a gold mine of information, among other things about diseases and their treatment, and most certainly more is to follow. Richard Dawkins made himself a “disgrace”, to cite his own word, in perpetrating that unintelligent, unscientific idea that the origin of life can best be explained by declaring the most part of genetic information as junk. Today it sounds like a joke.
Actually, he condensed it into one word only : "Hallucination" !
I guess I must have been "hallucinating" for more than 45 years by now, then.
It was more than one sentence....
dfr *Absolutely beautiful and true one from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
But I am the third and I I'm neither foolish nor unhappy.
All you did was state an opinion and had no evidence to support it.
So you're saying every Hindu is unhappy?
Really?
*Absolutely very beautiful and true one from Newton:* _In want of other proofs, the thumb would convince me of the existence of a God._
Be forewarned. You could have your channel completely deleted without warning or opportunity of getting it back for repeating yourself as you’ve done in this feed if someone reports you…esp. you do it elsewhere as well.
@@NaturesInfiniteWELLth-fo6rs *Are you ok, Eldridge?* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@biglongfish9253 He is not Elldridge, are you okay after all your trash was deleted on that other video?
Why post about the existence of God after you said "I am not a Christian" - are you crazy?
*My last v1de0 shows how a 65 year old b-allet dancer insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno and then he denied it, lying shamelessly that I said all these....*
You said "all these" what? All your claims that I'm everyone on YT are lies? Yes they are.
0:59 “… the only alternative is that the Intelligent Designer deliberately set out to deceive us in a most dubious way…” (might be a bit off with the quote)
Or maybe the similarities in genomes shows a common Designer. This is not an issue at all for me as a Creationist. If I as a writer write a dozen books and you run my wording through a scanner and analyze it, I’m sure you could tell they all came from the same person. This is a really basic concept of creativity. The creator has a style they use.
OK, now provide evidence that this creator exists.
@ 1) The Cosmological Argument, that the universe had a beginning.
A. All things that have a beginning have a cause (premise based on induction)
B. The universe had a beginning (known by observation)
C. Conclusion: The universe had a cause.
Since the universe includes space, time, and matter, the cause of it must be spaceless, timeless, and immaterial, all of which are characteristics of God.
2) Design of the universe and of life.
A. Information always has a “coder.”
B. DNA, precise (and vital) mathematical principles of the universe, etc. are forms of information.
C. Information found in the universe has a “coder,” i.e. God.
3) Moral Law.
A. All laws have a law-giver.
B. Humanity shares a common Moral Law across time and space.
C. Humanity has a Law-giver, i.e. God.
@TheHER7LD 1)You have absolutely no evidence that the cause in question is a god, much less yours.
2)a)"Information" is not defined in science, as such it means nothing.
b) DNA is prone to replicate wrongly and has plenty of useless parts, mathematical and physical constants have values that extremely complex. A wise creator doesn't make things that are complicated or prone to mistake. So the complexity of the universe is an argument against an all-knowing deity.
c) That's an unsupported claim.
3) Humanity doesn't share moral laws. To some cutting the hand of a thief is just to others it is barbaric. There is no uniformity of morality in the human species as a whole.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien Thanks for keeping it organized.
1) I provided a line of reasoning which you failed to acknowledge. All you said was “that’s not evidence.” I argued that the cause must possess some of the same characteristics which a theistic god possesses. I never said the God of the Bible except by natural bias, but I never argued for that God in particular here.
2)
A) “Information” means nothing because it isn’t defined by science? Do things need to be defined by science to mean something now?
B) Christianity has an answer to DNA replicating wrongly: sin nature and the fall of humanity. It’s the fault of the Creation, not the Creator. The medical community used to think the appendix is useless; we’ve learned better since then. A wise creator doesn’t make things that are complex? That’s completely unfounded and subjective. What level of complexity makes it too complex to warrant a wise creator? A car is pretty complex to me, so it must have no intelligent, wise creator, right? It also is prone to mistakes like people running into trees. That falls on the inventor, right?
C) The conclusion logically follows the premises, actually. You haven’t shown otherwise.
3) There are variations in the carrying-out of justice, definitely. But what cultures agree on throughout history is that stealing is wrong. Imagine a society where a person is praised for betraying everyone closest to him or where deserters in warfare are given medals, for example. Think bigger. Humanity has always agreed with these basic moral principles. Even people that claim morality is subjective prove themselves wrong as soon as someone treats them unfairly, even though that other person can claim they have the moral right to trample on them.
@@TheHER7LD 1) You are wrong, I didn't fail to acknowledge your line of reasonning; I called out your conclusion which wasn't based on any argument. Not even the ones you made. You said _"Since the universe includes space, time, and matter, the cause of it must be spaceless, timeless, and immaterial"_ but that just isn't a necessity. For all we know, the cause could have material, present at some point in time and space. We don't know what was before the big bang, as such claiming that time, space and matter weren't things is an unsupported assertion.
2) a) Things need to be defined yes, and when used to determine a scientific conclusion they must be defined by science. In that case you attempted to make a scientific argument therefore science is required to define your terms, yes.
b) That christian excuse is terrible and is in fact the fault of the creator for multiple reasons:
-Adam and Eve couldn't have known that eating the fruit was wrong since they didn't know right from wrong, a just ruler doesn't punish someone for doing something they absolutely couldn't have known was bad.
-God is supposed omniscient, therefore he knew that humans would eat the forbidden fruit yet he let the setup the same way knowing what was to happen.
-According to the story Adam and Eve ate the fruit, but I didn't. Therefore in punishing me God is punishing the innocent; the characteristic of a tyrant.
Moreover, your example of the appendix is just that, an example. I'm speaking about parts of DNA that do not code, about organs that do not do anything at all such muscles to move your ears. They're too small to do anything worthwile with it that could help, and that is if you possess them which many people do not and yet they have absolutely no trouble living.
Also, you asked _"What level of complexity makes it too complex to warrant a wise creator?"_, the answer is "when there are useless part and it can make mistakes, in other words when it's needlessly complex". Your comparisson with the car is bad for a few reasons:
-Yes, when it is the car that fails (not the driver) then the car maker is put to blame.
-The car doesn't have any useless part, they are not all required to drive but perhaps help the driver be more comfortable. In any case, there isn't a part that is there just to be there.
c) I, in fact, did. Since I've shown that "information" is meaningless, stating that information always has a coder is also meaningless. As for the premise b) I perfectly said that needless complexity doesn't arise from intelligence. So I critized both of your arguments correctly.
kf6 *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"2ndchookie"/"davidbanner" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
NOT DAVID BANNER....,..
*Absolutely beautiful and true one from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
"The first are rational", you're making a great case for showing that Kelvin had a great sense of humor and mastered the art of irony.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien hyg *Absolutely beautiful and true one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@changgi-tn4uy Yep, your fear of complete sentences is showing Larsen.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Absolutely beautiful and true one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 when did your fear of full sentences start Larsen?
*Exceptionally beautiful and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1800's ?? ...... mmmmm! "Out Of Date' by 100+ years!!
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
@@2ndchookie919 *And your claim that ostriches have no wings is outdated since the first ostrich lived on the planet earth.*
*Unforgettable and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*Happy Birthday, Sir Isaac Newton! I still remember his lovely words:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
I sincerely hope this is yer LAST Christmas.
Is that the age you want to go back to, Lor?
He would have been ostracized, or worse, had he not played along.
@@jacoblehrer4198 True and that happened to all who thought it opportune to bring the light to religion. Fundies really believe that their historical and methodical coercion is a sign of devotion rather than survival.
Well, if there's one thing one can't blame a fundie of, it's knowing the actual history of religion rather than the fabricated one.
@@JZsBFF *R u trying to say that ur beliefs that u come from bacteria and that nature can create information and codes make u superior to Newton, bud?*
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth, OR,
In the beginning, a mindless nothing created everything, including all life and everything for that life to survive and prosper.
I'll choose an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent God, the Creator, every time.
why is there a god? where does he come from?
@@VanoArts why is there Not a god? Where do we come from?
Don Q Paul Excellent reply!!
@@VanoArts where dose the a.i game creator come from wise guy so he didn't create the game huh
Good question Don O, tell us why there are no gods to be found anywhere?
jhy *From Arno Penzias, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who codiscovered the cosmic microwave background radiation:* _The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole._
*Absolutely beautiful and true from Jesus:* _I am the Way, the Truth and the Life_
lol…!
Just believe it really hard without question!
Yeah, no.
@ glad to be sharing the planet with critical thinkers.
👍🏼🙏🏼
@@DW-indeed *U believe a lot of bs without questioning.*
@ruach-m2b You know nothing about my beliefs or how much questioning of them I have done.
*A lovely one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so nonsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
19th century wasn't the best time to openly disbelieve.
@@Aurora666_yt*Ur rtrdtion impedes u from understanding that my quote is about someone who openly p-ssd on ur doctrine.* 😅😅😅
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 And continuing to research physics is openly pissing on Kelvin's idea that physics' over.
im pretty sure his expertise was temperature measurement
your quotes are like listening to a plumber try and explain what he knows about brain surgery
@@ripvanwinkle2002 *Unforgettable one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"One fact to rule them all"
One error to deceive them all.
@@civilization57 one strawman of science*
I don't think Dawkins understands that the same fact is also evidence for creation. It's all about the philosophy you use to interpret what common genetic code means...
ruclips.net/video/XzPxrT4ULUM/видео.html
@@garrettpapit Exactly. Look at the computer code for Windows 1-10. You'll see a consistent pattern of development in complexity. Right? But only an idiot would deny "intelligent design" and say it evolved.
@@garrettpapit I don't think it's evidence for the creation story. You could say that an intelligent being turned it all loose and let it evolve, but that each species was created independently, in six days, given the clear story written in life's genes? I don't see it.
fgg *Very beautiful one from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS*The 66 year old A-n-drew Eldridge aka the crctre of yt.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703
_"I'm not a Christian"_
- Donald Trump
Whoops! 😆😆😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
*True and beautiful from Psalm 72:*
_Praise be to YHWH, the God of Israel, who alone does marvelous deeds._
_Praise be to his glorious name forever; may the whole earth be filled with his glory._
Funny that you would post these 150 psalms 150 times since you said "I am not a Christian"
Not a true believer, just a "sugar" Christian? Who but a Christian would posts psalms on a Dawkins video?
"I am not a Christian" you said, so were you lying then or are you lying now?
Why post to the glory of YHWH when you don't believe in him? Are you crazy?
*A beautiful one from Dawkins, he has my respect for it:* _A serious case could be made for a deistic God._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*_"SQUAAAAAAARK!!!! .... CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER!! , ..... SQUAAAARK!!"_*
*_"SQUAAAAAAAAARK!!!! ...... DUMBASS CRETARD!! , ....... SQUAAAAAARK!!"_*
Define "deistic god" ! .... Sighhhhhhhh!
@@chookization : A god with deistic.....obvious.....
@@davidbanner6230 So, .... you're actually dumber than _[ATMSR - dingbat cretard]_ ~~~ Buwahahahaha!
Fake quote, he said a "reasonably respectable" case could be make, but not in your case, of course.
*Very beautiful one from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
and eventually he gets to: i use computers because i studied programming
christians believe
god cloned himself by raping an under age bride cuckolding her honest and just husband
so he could torture that clone to convince himself not to torture the rest of us
for a sin we werent alive to commit
that involves a trans woman , made from a mans body part, eating an apple while talking to a snake.
because he loves us...
and you wonder why we think you people are insane..
@@theorenhobart *Unforgettable one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Literally who?
*A very beautiful one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Just as beautiful as "X-rays will turn out to be a hoax"?
@@immanuelkant6309 *Kelvin made you mad, Eldridge.*
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t On the contrary, when Kelvin asserted that "heavier than air flying machines are impossible" I had to laugh. Haven't you flown in a jet yet?
He got stuff wrong about atheism too.
*I really do love DNA. Your amazingly complex and intelligent organism is built following the instructions written on a piece of information whose volume is 80 times smaller than the one of a single living cell. DNA a masterpiece and the undeniable evidence for an intelligent creator.*
God's design is flawed and rife with _'mutation'_ !! Buwahahahahahahahaha!
@@2ndchookie919 *How would you know that, ballet dancer andr-ew "ergonomover" eld-ridge? Because your only link with science is the username "scientist flanders" used for another trolling account of yours.*
@@2ndchookie919 *How would you know that, ballet dancer andr-ew "ergonomover" eld-ridge? Because your only link with science is the username "scientist flanders" used for another trolling account of yours.*
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t So, .. you're saying that genetic deformities and debilitating diseases are 'not' a flaw and that God is a cruel and inhumane a-h@le?? ~~ Buwahahahahahaha!
@@2ndchookie919 *By saying "flaws", you acknowledge an intelligent creator, because natural processes don't produce flaws, ballet dancer and-rew "ergonomover" eldr-idge.*
ghy *Very beautiful one from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
*Simply beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
asww *My favorite v2de0 is "Ergonomover and the ostrich" which shows the evolution from a man to a g-1bbon.*
Flagged for lying, harassment, abusive content, misinformation and being utter drivel.
@@DocReasonable*Flag it more, Eldridge!* 😅😅😅😅
@@changgi-tn4uy I'm not Mr Eldridge, turnip.
@@DocReasonable *Why? Did u change ur sex and now u r Miss Eldridge?* 😅😅😅😅
@@DocReasonable *Did u change ur name, Eldridge?*
drq *RIP evolution! From live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😂😂😂😂
*Simply beautiful and deep one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
The Newton who was suffering from severe mercury p0is0ning? Checks out.
@@DocReasonable 😄
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
Where does it say it was created? Name a scientific book. 😂
@@miguelangelcabreraaguilar4259 *A scientific book saying what, rtrd? Do you need a scientific book attesting that pigs cannot fly?*
*Eldridge from his trolling account "ergonomover":* _No one insisted ostriches have no wings_
*Eldridge in the same thread, about my v1de0:* _I watched about all of it_
*Now watch the v3de0 "ergonomover and the ostrich" and tell me that this r-rd doesn't lie...* 😂😂😂😂
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS ded *Yes, this is what you do: lying/trolling/projecting, b-r-a1nless c-lwn.*
@@gunnybear-fw6of
👆 *LYING,* 👆 *QUOTE-MINING,* 👆 *PROJECTING* 👆 *TROLL* 👆 *ALERT!* 👆
*Take the 7-8 pieces of the simplest puzzle, bring them wherever you want on this planet, shuffle them and let any natural force act upon them. It will never fit the pieces together, but id-iots are dreaming that it can put together many billions of dynamic parts, each with its own set of functions, all interconnected.*
Nature put together nearly 4 billion pieces of the biodiversity of species puzzle. You, however, are unable to put two facts together. You are more like the 5 major extinction events that destroyed most -braincells- species over and over.
@@ergonomover *After the production line for ur computer is intelligently put in place, you can say that natural processes involved in this process are assembling it, but no, rtrd, it is the human mind that made it possible. For once in your life you should be less rtrded and show that nature can do things starting from scratch.*
@@ergonomover 👏🤝
Computers are not biological entities that transmit genetic code. Your analogy is bogus.
The human mind is a product of Darwin's mill of natural selection. If "Scratch" is absolute nothingness, it might never have existed. You should learn some science for once in your life.@@biglongfish9253
Pretending everyone is me, who supposedly texts 22 hours a day between leaps and pirouettes shows everyone your insanity and impotence in dealing with rational arguments, that's why you post so many emojis and puerile insults.@@biglongfish9253
kas *From Arno Penzias, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who codiscovered the cosmic microwave background radiation:* _The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole._
so ... he thinks that the earth was created before the sun.
interesting lol.
@@RandyWinn42 *So u think that the explosion of something coming out of nothing can create stars?*
@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 We do in fact observe "something coming out of nothing" ... the Casimir effect depends on it.
Why do you ask?
*An exceptionally beautiful one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
More absurdity and violence from the Book of Morals:
'And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and *when they awoke early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses.*
2 Kings 19:35
@@DocReasonable *Let me quote you, Eldridge:* _If someone said 'press this button and Gustard dxxx' I would have no hesitation in pressing that button. Repeatedly._
_How great are your works, YHWH, how profound your thoughts!_
_Senseless people do not know, fools do not understand,_
_that though the wicked spring up like grass and all evildoers flourish, they will be destroyed forever._
*Psalm 92*
*Grow up, rtrd.*
"I am not a Christian" you said, so were you lying then or are you lying now?
Why post to the glory of YHWH when you don't believe in him? Are you crazy?
*Very beautiful one from Dawkins, he has my respect for it:* _A serious case could be made for a deistic God._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Define _"deistic "_ ~~ Sighhhhhhhhh!
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
@@2ndchookie919 *Try a dictionary. Last time when you used one, you told us that the Italian translation of Saturday is....Saturno. So....*
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t And _'again'_ I say, .... wasn't me dingbat!!
So, .... you won't provide the characteristics of a deistic god???? Pathetic.
@biglongfish9253 : He's bound to have your respect....you respesct your self, do you not?
hyh *Absolutely beautiful and true from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
@changgi-tn4uy
Nice bias you have there…where did you get it?
@@TheWorld_2099 *D-mb question. How did u make it?*
@@TheWorld_2099 He got that at the Quick-E market, probably.
@ruach-m2b iHow Christ-like of you to call people such things.
He would be so proud.
Actually you did not study Jesus's life. You studied second hand accounts of the life of a character called Jesus. Each account different from the other. The truth is that not one person who wrote a single word about Jesus claimed to have met him in person!
*Simply beautiful, from Dawkins, he has my respect for it:* _A serious case could be made for a deistic God._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Saying similarities automatically prove ancestry is the most ridiculous lack of good judgement I wouldn't expect from a scientist what a stupid thing to say please tell me you also think that way
@@antoniobrown6210 : You must be joking? Only Dawkins would embarras himself by making such grovelling statments....
@@antoniobrown6210 *I totally agree and actually many people in this comment section spotted the same thing.*
Mae Culpa: Yes I did say that Dawkins cannot answer, because Dawkins never answers, regardless of the competence of his interviewers, he always rides above reality, like a man thinking a snow-drift is reality, while inserting infantile supersitions to fit in with the persona he has conned his sycophants into believing they are seeing who he is…..?
we all have our bad days.
siu *Happy Birthday, Sir Isaac Newton! I still remember his lovely words:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him._
Classic symptoms ☝️ of sadomasochism. ✅️
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS*It looks like Newton p-sed on ur doctrine, 66 year old troll.*
@@Lorabundy-vi5uw
It looks like biological evolution annihilated The Book of Genesis.
*An example of acute rtrdation, I am quoting the 65-year-old b-allet dancer A-n-drew Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"mntllyderanged"/"flandiddlyandersFRS":*
_Dropped from 250,000 to 237,000. That's a drop of -23,000. Or an increase of 23,000 if you want to be pedantic._ 😂😂😂😂😂
CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING NEW OR ORIGINAL?
THAT'S OK.... WE KNOW IT'S PART OF YOUR LOW IQ
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
*Simply beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
And when you find it, then you can claim you know, but until then, you should bring evidence.
njj *Absolutely beautiful and true one from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
rational god
@@theorenhobart *All the greatest scientists of this planet said the opposite, r-trd.*
@@theorenhobart *Unforgettable one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
yeq *The d-mbest and the most evil troll you could encounter is the 66 year old b-allet dancer A-n-d-rew Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"puppetmaster"/"AI-CREATARD", who insisted that ostriches have no wings (see the v6de0 "ergonomover and the ostrich").*
@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 You're a weirdo and a complete fool. The only most stupidest religion is you.
*Very beautiful and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
1800's ?? ...... mmmmm! "Out Of Date' by 100+ years!!
Get With The Program Cteard !!!!! ~~ Buwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
@@2ndchookie919 *You insisted that ostriches have no wings, quite outdated I would say.* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t Nope, .... not me dingbat!
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t *_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
"In the beginning, God."
ANYTHING after THOSE FOUR WORDS is merely commentary.
In the beginning is wrong, it proves god is a myth.
"In the beginning man created god in his own image" anything after that is merely commentary & special pleading
Should have started with "Once upon a time" like all other fairy tales
*Absolutely beautiful and true from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
All victims of propaganda.
_A little while, and the wicked will be no more; though you look for them, they will not be found._
*Psalm 37*
So, you agree, ... these are your _Troll accounts!_ , .... correct? ~~ Buwahahahahahahahahahahaha!
biglongfish9253
atheism-themoststupidrelig8802
user-tu1co9xl1k
atheism-themoststupidrelig5703
糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻
Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
A little while, and the wicked will be no more; though you look for them, they will not be found.
Psalm 37
A world without christians? Can't wait!
*A very beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s called COMMON FUNCTION!
@Julian Borges, Book Flip might be talking about this idea:
"Homology involves the theory that macroevolutionary relationships can be proven by the similarity in the anatomy and physiology of different animals. Since Darwin, homology has been cited in textbooks as a major proof for evolution. A review of the literature on homology indicates that the theory does not provide evidence for evolutionary naturalism, and that the common examples of homology can be better explained by Creation. Furthermore, increased knowledge about the genetic and molecular basis of life has revealed many major exceptions and contradictions to the theory which, as a result, have largely negated homology as a proof of evolution."
Common function is phenotypes; Dawkins is talking about genotypes.
@@isaacharvey
"A review of the literature on homology "
So - Not scientific-method derived then. Ok.
It's funny, the claim is made as if supported by scientific evidence..
@@kijekuyo9494It’s genotypes too.
A Human construction company often uses the same bricks, windows, doors, roofing materials, etc., to construct schools, hospitals, office buildings, condos or hotels. They often use the same or similar blueprint designs for different buildings.
This doesn't mean that these buildings erected themselves or "evolved" from whirling dust devils over millions of years.
Nor does it mean that buildings are alive and reprodruce.
Your logical fallacy is:
False Analogy.
Dismissed 🚮
You clearly do not understand the difference between living and non-living things.
@timdavis7845 Are U creatards EVER going to stop making these laughable fallacious analogies?? Paintings, buildings, cars etc have to be a constructed using raw materials. And yet you claim that the entire universe and each animal species magically appeared FROM NOTHING out of thin air. So how is that a valid comparison?
@@EvolutionIsSelfEvident I do not deny, that there are genetic similarities between living organisms. I mean to point out, that among the myriad organisms - these genetic similarities suggest a common Intelligent Designer who used the same "palette" and "blue prints" in His creative designs.
I cannot believe, that EVERYTHING was created by NOBODY out of NOTHING.
The "Laws of Nature" are too predictable and too well structured to be randomly occurring phenomena.
*Absolutely beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
*Believing in Aronra's cult goes hand in hand with rtrdation. As an example I am quoting the 65-year-old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"mntllyderanged"/"flandiddlyandersFRS":*
_Dropped from 250,000 to 237,000. That's a drop of -23,000. Or an increase of 23,000 if you want to be pedantic._ 😂😂😂😂😂
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
You're pulling my leg ...?
@@davidbanner6230 He was saying that you are actually me for months. Pulling everyone's leg.
*Unforgettable one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
huy *Quoting again Eldridge, from his account "docreasonable":* _As a male ballet dancer, I have r-eady a-ccess to many of the most beautiful women in the world_
If only I were docreasonable, you wouldn't be lying. Do you have wet dreams about all those beautiful women I worked with for decades? Going on nearly 2 years and you are still obsessed with it, what's wrong, you can't get a date? Your nutsack refuses to descend properly? I'm afraid your love/hate relationship with an old male dancer isn't helping in that department. Maybe time for you to find a new hobby.
@@ergonomover*Quotes like the one above r clear evidence that u and "docreasonable" r the same 1-nsane r-trd.*
@@changgi-tn4uy They're clear evidence that you cannot tell people apart, have paranoid delusions and ill-will. You got it wrong, I use ONE account, try to grow up.
@@ergonomover *U mean both u and "docreasonable" r b-allet dancers, oth insists that ostriches have no wings, both r rtrdd and both are trolling the same sites?*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 No, as I keep insisting, we are 2 different people and neither of us were ever a "b-allet" dancer. Is that really your most potent homophobic slur, repetitive rtrd?
Now ask him for an example of genetic mutation adding new information to the genome. 😂😂😂
Do you understand that every living thing on earth is related to a common ancestor. LUCA proves our DNA is all related.
@@yeshuaisjoshua LUCA is a postulated, unproven being. In no way is that anything remotely resembling proof.
DNA being similar among all life makes sense to me. I don't need some magic common ancestor to explain it. If an intelligent mind is behind the universe and everything in it, it would logically follow that all life would be made from similar material, using similar means.
Theorize all the ancient beings you want. We still can't demonstrate ONE example of genetic mutation resulting in an addition of information. That would be necessary for this imaginary LUCA to become all other life forms, to include fungi and plants.
"Proof"...
@@gowsif_dnb Like the mutation that lets me drink milk?
Or new one they found a mutation in the LRP5 gene can also cause an uncommon disorder in which bone density is greatly increased.
@@gowsif_dnb Now how about you show us some of your fairy tale magic?????
Go on, show us, I could use a good laugh
@@devilmonkey427 you seem to be confusing "addition of information" and "beneficial change."
*Absolutely beautiful this one from Newton:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
hyu *Beautiful, from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
I am 100% behind Christianity and Biblical study being a part of the American education system
This way, we will have a steady production of atheists.
Christopher Hitchens was a god!!! hehehe Damn do we need him today. Miss you CH.
I like's yo thinkn boy.....
@@GungaLaGunga Irony. He was a god. Only, he didn't know that.
@@Acrocanthosaurus It is a shame the religious folk miss out on all the other topics Hitchens speaks about. I recently watched his talks about George Orwell. Incredible things to think about that are very relevant in 2023.
@@GungaLaGunga Philosopher here. Much harder to argue with. I've yet to be impressed with anything Hitchens has ever said but his thoughts on Orwell might be interesting.
*Quoting the 65 year old rtrd ballet dancer A. Eldridge (aka "creationists-arecrybabies", "flandiddlyanders") from his account "docreasonable"* _OK fine! I'll admit that captainatheist9855 is my trolling account (it's where I make rtrded comments)_
*The sad truth is that all his comments from all his trolling accounts are rtrded....* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The sad truth is that I use ONE account and you melted down completely.
@@ergonomover : you are a pathetic lost soul, with a rudimentary childish understanding, Those tiny communities are incapable of surviving today, while surrounded by stability, so you can imagine the carnage that would have taking place then?
What about the establishment of universities and factories making toilet bowls, do you think those tiny comitie
s could have done that? Groe up and get real…..and Fk off, I’m tired of talking to children and Dawkin’s made up names…..go away you shallow idiot…
When your best argument is calling someone "R"
yall know you have no argument.
Also, go back to Jesus, you need to be a better person.
@@ergonomover *There is undeniable, public evidence that u r behind all these accounts, Eldridge.*
gyh *RIP evolution! From live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😂😂😂😂
hgy *Another example of inhuman ridiculousness with Eldridge praising himself from his account "docreasonable":* _Mr Ergonomover is a dapper-looking chap, full of personality, wry humour, wit and wisdom - with a million fascinating life stories to tell_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
lao *RIP evolution: from live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😅😅😅😅😅
Did you read the Live Science report yet? The experts say evolution theory is not overturned or bothered at all by the new discovery which will lead to healthier crops and better cancer medicine. Thanks for reminding everyone of the strength and usefulness of evolution theory. Can you remind us which god requires you to deny settled science?
ghy *Very beautiful one, from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Actually beautiful one for Einstein, that quotes denounces the cults like the one Larsen is apart of. He doesn't know it since it requires to understand basic English.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien*It denounces ur cult, r-trd* 😅😅😅😅😅
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 No because "the the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle" clearly refers to a religion they left, yours to be precise.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien*It denounces ur cult, rtrd.*
@@lorann-ut5cq The "chains" are a reference to theism. What theism are you chained to? You said last month "I am not a Christian" so are you a Muslim or perhaps a liar? Why so many fake accounts, lorann or should I say lora, loran or Lorabundy? Doran, Dorian, Mulan, moran and 4 that say "stupidreligion"?
Or intelligent design. All Dawkins hopes to achieve is steer people to believe they were created for nothing into a world which means nothing and die to nothing. To be no more important than a bug or a weed. So very sad.
"There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has a responsibility to give your life meaning and point… The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful, as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it." --Dawkins
Bugs and weeds do not have our huge, evolved brains with higher functions. We are going to use them, even if you don't use yours.
Why are humans more important than bugs or weeds? Humans are so flawed. Why did god make flawed humans? IE all of them. Sad.
Why do you need to be the creation of a supernatural being to find meaning in your life ?
I think making the belief that you are the special creation of supernatural entities a prerequisite to finding meaning , joy or just contentment in existence to be very sad .
@@jonnawyatt The Creation story says Creation was made perfect! It was Man's Free Will to choose that introduced the flaw into the World. No other creature has it... they are ruled by their instinct to survive...
@@justinjewell8329 People don't NEED to be created, but many feel they were! People find meaning in their lives no matter if they believe in God or not. And who says God is Supernatural? Is that your understanding?
*From Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
*Beautiful example of severe rtrdtion, the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"mtllyderanged" said this "An entire human digitized genome = 3.436687 Gb. My computer could hold 330 of them" and then "That's an argument for the superi0rity of humans over god". Was he right, because unlike his computer, a human body holds.....30 trillion copies of a genome!!!!!!* 😂😂😂 😂😂😂 😂😂😂
The "superiority" quote was not mine, you lose again, liar.
@@ergonomover *My beautiful videos show that I am right and I am glad that you like them, Eldridge.*
*Absolutely beautiful one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
nbj *RIP evolution: from live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😅😅😅😅😅
frt *RIP evolution! From live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😂😂😂😂
It's great to see you taking an interest in scientific articles that confirm evolution is true.
😃👍
@@EvolutionIsSelfEvident *It would be great if u could spend all this time learning ur native language.*
@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 'you' and 'your'.
*A nice example of incredible rtrdation, quoting the 65-year-old dancer A. Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"FlandiddlyandersFRS"/"mntllyrtrded", the most c-rr-tt in ous troll of the century:*
*he:* _An entire human digitized genome = 3.436687 Gb. My computer could hold 330 of them._
*he again:* _That's an argument for the superi0rity of humans over god_
*Right, because unlike his computer, a human body holds.....30 trillion copies of a genome!!!!!!* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Learn English, fool.
Imagine having the power to stop school shooters in their tracks, but not exercising that power. That is beyond evil ... that's 'God'
hahahahah WOW.. i read through all these comments and i see nothing but baffoons who lack any intelligence and critical thinking. None of you have taken the time to think before you type. All of you sound like you suffer from a mental disorder known as atheism.
the reason there are school shooters is because they dont believe in god anymore, never seen a man of god shooting ups schools
*Read Bhagvat Gita 🙏 spoken by God.* *Life and consciousness cannot be created by a combination of material elements DNA etc because all material elements are themselves lifeless and devoid of consciousness. The effect must exist in the cause itself. Life and Matter are two separate distinct entities. The soul is a conscious person. The material body is the soul's covering. Life as we see it on Earth is a soul covered by a material body. Life does not evolve from matter. Life is a separate entity.*
Someone clear don’t understand god but please don’t ascribe lies to the most high do your research first then speak on religion
@@guccihead9653 Researched it more than you ever will, slob. Learn English too.
*Absolutely beautiful, Aronra's cult is so prominent that the b-allet dancer a-nd-rew Eldridge made an army of t-rolling accounts and has to t-roll and to carry imaginary dialogs to them non-stop.* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
*A beautiful one from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
So, .. you don't provide the _'entire'_ quote!! ~ Once again, .. LYING FOR GOD ~ Sighhhhhh!
_"It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, →a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means← to a very, very high level of technology- and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. And I suppose it's possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer."_
@@2ndchookie919*What I provided is enough. You can keep c-rying, Eldridge.*
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻-b3t →a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means← ... correct?
*Beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*_"SQUAAAAAAARK!!!! .... CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER!! , ..... SQUAAAARK!!"_*
*_"SQUAAAAAAAAARK!!!! ...... DUMBASS CRETARD!! , ....... SQUAAAAAARK!!"_*
nmki *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"yeshuaisjoshua"/"dougwalker"/"AI-CREATARD" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
Well, that was rubbish. God obviously does not lend intelligibility.
@@twcnz3570 *What was rubbish, r-trd?*
r-tard?
boy, you sure do know how to not listen to Jesus.
*DNA alone flusters Aronra's disciples.*
Lmao, it completely invalidates theists like you. We can see the cope in your posts
Although I never had the pleasure of meeting him, I miss Christopher Hitchens. The world was a better place with him in it.
@ginobarila LOL, wow, there's the text book example of missing the point. No, I'm afraid not.
*Absolutely beautiful, quoting the ballet dancer A-ndrew Eldridge, the most c-rr-tt in ous troll of the century:*
*he:* _An entire human digitized genome = 3.436687 Gb. My computer could hold 330 of them._
*he again:* _That's an argument for the superi0rity of humans over god_
*Right, because unlike his computer, a human body holds.....30 trillion copies of a genome!!!!!!* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You think beautiful things come from "c-rr-tt in ous" trolls?
"He again:" no, not me, it was someone else. Imagine that all the people telling you they are not me are right - will Jesus survive yet another scandal? Nice how you were able to run other creationists off videos, Adrian Moire and Hwd71 hated your lack of respect.
*Simply beautiful and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Why do kākāpōs have wings, ...... after all, they are parrots, ..... or are they owls?? ~ Either way, they can't fly.
dsar *The 65 year old b-allet dancer A-n-d-re-w Eldridge ( (aka "ergonomover"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"docreasonable"/"yeshuaisjoshua"), the one who insisted that ostriches have no wings, was screaming that no one has refuted the "fact" of Dawkins (this "fact" being actually a fallacy "similarites = inheritance"), but look, Dawkins himself did it:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ben Stein lied to you and you swallowed it.
@@ergonomover *That must be the method that Aronra applies to his disciples.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Aronra is aligned with the global scientific community and wields facts and evidence - did your putzy interview with him hurt you so badly you never got over it? Poor boy!
@@ergonomover *What does Aronra have to do with science. As much as u, the one who insisted that there is a single copy of the genome in the human body have to do with science.*
@@ergonomover *I would say u need to stop this ridiculous game of playing the smart one. It's too painful for u, considering ur dense rtrdtion.*
ghu *RIP evolution: from live science, 2022:* _New study provides first evidence of non-random mutations in DNA. This goes against one of the key assumptions of the theory of evolution_ 😅😅😅😅😅
kingdom of god come NOT by outward observation... kingdom of god is within you
it's allegory; heaven=head; earth=body; new heaven=renewed mind; new earth=renewed strength; new jersualem=(city of) peace inside...
behold I show you a mystery, we shall not all sleep; corruption shall put on incorruption, mortality shall put on immortality;
I shall quicken (bring to life) your mortal bodies;
the whole creation awaits in earnest expectation for the manifestation of the SONS of god!!!
All Gods are imaginary.
*Beautiful one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*God kills half a million of his own chosen people... no explanation given*
"God smote Jeroboam and all Israel before Abijah and Judah. And the children of Israel fled before Judah: and God delivered them into their hand. And Abijah and his people slew them with a great slaughter: so there fell down slain of Israel five hundred thousand chosen men." 2 Chronicles 13:15-17
why not just fanatical and atheist? why f-anatical and a-theists?
*Simply wonderful, this one from Einstein:* _the fanatical atheists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Einstein wrote, "I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him." He also stated, "I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own - a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms." Einstein was one of the most intelligent men to ever live, and he's nailed it here. Only buffoons would disagree with his views on the spiteful Abrahamic dogmas.
@@biglongfish9253 Albert Einstein, 1954, the year before his death AND his last word on this subject: “The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can change this”. Einstein, who died the following year aged 76, did not spare Judaism from his criticism, believing Jewish people were in no way “chosen” by God. He wrote: “For me the Jewish religion like all others is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people.”
*Simply wonderful, this one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@DocReasonable *Don't you find strange that even Einstein pssed on y-our doctrine?* 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@糸攴鬼㐯衣豸麻 Atheism is not a doctrine.
similarities in DNA are not evidence of common ancestry, but rather evidence of a common designer. The idea is that a Creator, knowing how to create life efficiently, could have used a similar genetic blueprint for different creatures to fulfill various roles in nature. For example, the same fundamental genetic mechanisms might be used across species because they were designed with similar principles in mind. Even a high schooler can refute this atheist
I agree, but evolutionists will say that it leads to a common ancestor. Not sure if they can refute the fact that genetic material can never be created, only lost, and that mutations are only harmful.
If someone comes along to prove me wrong, then let everyone else see it cause I don't have comment notifications on.
If similarities indicate a 'common' designer', what do differences indicate?? En clowns.
@@ethanton7074 You're just plain wrong as genetic material can in fact be created, wouldn't be something you would get wrong if you studied mutations just a tiny bit but you got it wrong anyway.
*The argument "similarities=inheritance" is a fallacy good only for rtrds like the troll who approached u from 3 trolling accounts, see v3de0s like "ergonomover and the ostrich" if u want to know more about him.*
@atheism-moststupidreligion The only thing you learn from that video is how insane you are Larsen. And your incredulity about similarities is of no concern to anyone.
dff *Absolutely beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_
*And we have the confirmation seeing the behavior of the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"* 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I keep pointing out your lies, incivilities, privacy violations, cyberstalking, Ad hominem attacks and other fallacies while posting quotes by famous thinkers. I realize you hate free-thought, skeptcism, critical thinking, good manners and logic, as you prove every day.
@@ergonomover *Very nice your reply. U r a proven, i-n-s-a-n-e l-iar, Eldridge.*
Thanks for proving my point, every day, in spades. You can't name a single lie by me, I don't lie.@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 you are such a beach that you don't even have a valid point or a clean head all you do is speak you fallacy to other when others say oh that's not true because what we observe in the world is different then you just sully their name coz even you don't know what to talk. Mooooooron😂😂😂
Well the way you type is certainly insane. I hope that there is a god up there. And that there is an afterlife. But when you get up there it's the Mormon god so you still end up being wrong. From my perspective you'll never know. It'll just be lights out and you'll never have known just how ignorant you have been. That's sad I want you to know.
juh *Quoting again Eldridge, from his account "docreasonable":* _As a male ballet dancer, I have r-eady a-ccess to many of the most beautiful women in the world_
*Simply beautiful one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Einstein, the man who didnt discover the theory of everything.
Context people.
fij *Very beautiful one from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
i left jesus because someone hijacked his story
*A very beautiful one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Creatards love slavery.....
That's why it's in your fairy tales.
"Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is of the same kind as the intolerance of the religious fanatics and comes from the same source." -Einstein, same dialogue
@@LoAssistidor-uk6qj *Just quoting wikipedia:* _According to biographer Walter Isaacson, Einstein was more inclined to denigrate atheists than religious people_
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@LoAssistidor-uk6qj “I received your letter of June 10th. I have never talked to a Jesuit priest in my life and I am astonished by the audacity to tell such lies about me. From the viewpoint of a Jesuit priest I am, of course, and have always been an atheist." --Einstein, 1945 letter to Raner
@@LoAssistidor-uk6qj A year and three and a half months before his death, Einstein wrote: "The word God is for me nothing but the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of venerable but still rather primitive legends. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change anything about this. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstition. I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them. "
A bishop, a parson, a rabbi, a vicar, a pastor, an imam and the pope walk into a bar.
The pope says, 'Well, let's compare our recent pedo adventures... I'll go first!'
hgyl *Simply beautiful one from Einstein:* _the f-anatical a-theists are like s-laves_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
And yet it doesn't occur to you that repeating a debunked lie makes you the fanatic. If you spend half the time you use to make all your alternate accounts into actually thinking, you would have understood that.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Repeating l-ies is what u do (and actually the ONLY thing u do all day long) , b-allet dancer Eldridge. Me repeating the truth is fine, sorry that truth hurts u.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 For that I would have to lie and you would have to tell the truth. Considering that you direct your comments to the wrong person that is far from being what happens.
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Show me my l-ie, c-lwn and tell me when and how u "debunked" it.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Let's see :
-You claim I am Mr. Eldrige. You can't prove it so debunked by lack of evidence. That also means that anything you say is about me when it's about Mr. Eldrige is also a lie.
-You say that Einstein was mocking atheists when the quote shows he is denouncing religion. That one, you were debunked by doc reasonable.
-You say that humans have symmetrical eyes, debunked by merely looking at humans. Are you so alone that you never met anyone? Did you never see yourself in a glass? At the surface of water?
And I didn't mention all your appeal to authority fallacies!
*Very beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*_"SKWAAAAAARK!!!! ~~~ CRETARD WANTS A CRACKER" ~~~~ SKWAAAAAARK!!!!_*
The more the emojis, the dumber the comment.
@@Spiritof_76 *Is there anyone interested in your opinions? Because I am not.*
Faith is the greatest shackle on the human spirit and mind.