This is a great video! Long form content is not dead! And you manage to keep the pace without jump cuts and leaving in "human moments" (oh, the table's wobbly). This would be my very first foray into long telephotos and this Tamron might be it (if I find a good 2nd hand deal). Liked and subscribed.
Regarding zoom, I don't even use the zoom ring. I just grab the front and push forward to zoom in. I can zoom in and out very quickly without twisting the barrel or camera. I like the focus clutch as it's easier to lock and unlock than the lock switch. I've been using the 90mm macro a lot so I'm used to not pulling or pushing on a focus or zoomring, so I haven't had any accidental locks because I know to pull on the ring as soon as I grab the camera. On other telephoto lenses, finding the lock switch takes a lot longer. I felt like I've missed a lot of shots by fumbling with that switch, but I've never missed a shot due to accidental locking the zoom using the clutch. I'm sure it's just a matter of habits and muscle memory.
It's great to hear about your technique and how you've adapted to using the zoom ring. You've highlighted an interesting aspect of developing muscle memory with your equipment. Thanks for sharing your perspective on using the clutch for focus - it's undoubtedly a matter of personal preference and what works best for you. Everyone has their own unique style of shooting, and it's valuable to hear how different techniques can be effective for various photographers. Happy shooting! 😊📷
@@BenjaminSmail I've been birding a lot with the lens by now and I now mostly just lock it at 500. There's a line on the sun hood that I use to aim the lens, looking over the EVF to aim. Ive been very happy with the Tamron.
Hello Benjamin, i gotta say that was an amazing and entertaining video! Thanks for taking the time to do this and keep going, you're definately winning my subscribe and views :) Looking forward for your new content. Cheers, Bulgaria.
Thank you so much. Means a lot to hear that and glad you enjoyed it. Hopefully more content coming soon when I leave my job this month. Hopefully stick around for more reviews and wildlife content. ✌️
I shun all the telescopiing lenses...(tho I have owned several)...shock from falling...moisture and dust magnets...to name a few...other than that I like your video presentation....American retired in Bangkok. Cheers P.S. I have a set of extension tubes along with a FE 70-200/4.... short distance macro is not a problem....I generally run with a pair of original A7c bodies.
Thx Ben, i am currently thinking about those 2 lens as i would like to try wildlife with my a7r3. I was leaning toward the sony but now i think tamron might be the right choice for me because of its portability. Great review based on real life experience ! You got a new subscriber.
Thank you, they are both solid choices, if size and packaging is an issues then yes tamron is a solid choice for its size and weight it can really pack a punch.
I liked your review but you missed the point with the manual focus ring : it is like that because you can touch it with the same hand you are pushing the shot . So try a little and you see it’s very handy. It is not at all a mistake it is a practical idea compared with Sony where you need to use also the other hand , which by the way you are using it to sustain the lens . All the best , message from a user of this lens !
I am trying to decided between theses two for my A7 IV, leaning towards the Tamron. I already have their 20-40 and 35-150, and I think I can nicely fit all three in my bag. I fear if I got the Sony lens I would windup never taking it with me. Great review! I guess I can forgive the hat, this time.
Thanks for considering both options for your A7 IV. It sounds like the Tamron lens would complement your existing setup nicely, and having all three lenses in your bag sounds convenient. Plus, it's always a bonus when you can carry all your gear without feeling weighed down. And hey, I'm glad you enjoyed the review, hat and all! Let me know if you have any other questions as you make your decision.
It is but it changes to much throughout the zoom. Which I find worse for video work. Not a issue for photography as much, but for video having your aperture change is not ideal. I normally set it to its highest amount and work with that. ✌️
Great review.. I’m in between these two lenses. Used the Sony runs around 1500 as the tamron runs about 900. Thinking for travel the tamron would be a better fit? More compact, looking to get into birding with my Sony a7riii. I would have some crop capability and the price is almost 600 cheaper on the used market..
Thanks! I dont think you can go wrong with either of them. The Tamron is a solid choice, especially for travel. You have the crop factor of the Sony R series for the extra reach if you need it.
Where I stay the Sigma 150-600 is cheaper than Tamron but some reviews say Sigma is bad with birds in flight. What do you recommend? Go for the reach or pick up Tamron and have the focusing ability
It's a hard one as both good lens. But if I was buying one today with my own money I would go for the tamron. But if you need that extra 100mm then I still think sigma is a nice option. Thanks 🙏
@BenjaminSmail i have informed myself, and as with Sony 's non 70-200 zooms, they focus breathe a lot while having L tier minimum focus distance. The 200-600 when set to 600 and 3m (minimum focus distance) it is a 300mm f9.0 the Tamron becomes a 590mm f7. And yes, focal reduction is completely avoidable, Sony is just lazy.
Kirk WM-2 Multi-Purpose Window Mount for Tripod Head. Still trying it out maybe video coming soon if you are intrested. It does not fit the best with my van door but works alot better in a car. ✌️
I would pick the Sony just for the internal zoom and more range alone. Unless you need that smaller set up. Don't think there would be much difference with the auto focus between them. ✌️
Very excited about the Sigma option to. See how it stacks up to the other options. Trying to get my hands on a review unit. Hopefully a review coming soon if sigma sends one out to me. ✌️
Yes depends on the location and how close the subject is of course. You can get close up details at 600 but of course the subject will still need to be a good distance
It’s funny to hear that the tamron was faster in focusing, the sony focuses faster, this is obvious, the tamron has poor stabilization and sharpness at 500 mm, and the bokeh is worse, since there are only 7 aperture blades, versus 11 for the sony
This is the only time I have used one. Would have to see on a long term use. I think the dust spots you see are on my Sony sensor, which really is dust hovers. ✌️
@@BenjaminSmail see I've found the sonys to be quite frankly a pain in the butt for dust, but I do love them, what I try and do I stay away from movable zoom lenses and now I'm sticking with fixed zoom, such as the 200-600 and the 70-200 G and Gm lenses, just to try and limit the dust particles from entering the sensor
Just ordered the tamron 20 minutes ago🫣🫣🫣 so excited
Love it! Hope you can get some good use from it
This is a great video! Long form content is not dead! And you manage to keep the pace without jump cuts and leaving in "human moments" (oh, the table's wobbly).
This would be my very first foray into long telephotos and this Tamron might be it (if I find a good 2nd hand deal).
Liked and subscribed.
Thank you so much! Yes, the table was a challenge, and I appreciate you noting to avoid jump cuts.
Regarding zoom, I don't even use the zoom ring. I just grab the front and push forward to zoom in. I can zoom in and out very quickly without twisting the barrel or camera. I like the focus clutch as it's easier to lock and unlock than the lock switch. I've been using the 90mm macro a lot so I'm used to not pulling or pushing on a focus or zoomring, so I haven't had any accidental locks because I know to pull on the ring as soon as I grab the camera.
On other telephoto lenses, finding the lock switch takes a lot longer. I felt like I've missed a lot of shots by fumbling with that switch, but I've never missed a shot due to accidental locking the zoom using the clutch. I'm sure it's just a matter of habits and muscle memory.
It's great to hear about your technique and how you've adapted to using the zoom ring. You've highlighted an interesting aspect of developing muscle memory with your equipment. Thanks for sharing your perspective on using the clutch for focus - it's undoubtedly a matter of personal preference and what works best for you. Everyone has their own unique style of shooting, and it's valuable to hear how different techniques can be effective for various photographers. Happy shooting! 😊📷
@@BenjaminSmail I've been birding a lot with the lens by now and I now mostly just lock it at 500. There's a line on the sun hood that I use to aim the lens, looking over the EVF to aim. Ive been very happy with the Tamron.
Hello Benjamin,
i gotta say that was an amazing and entertaining video!
Thanks for taking the time to do this and keep going, you're definately winning my subscribe and views :)
Looking forward for your new content.
Cheers, Bulgaria.
Thank you so much. Means a lot to hear that and glad you enjoyed it. Hopefully more content coming soon when I leave my job this month. Hopefully stick around for more reviews and wildlife content. ✌️
@@BenjaminSmail you got me for sure, I'm not a RUclips bot for comments.. :)
Awesome review, nice setup with the visuals and audio, your effort is much appreciated!
Thanks so much!
@@BenjaminSmail you are very welcome :)
I shun all the telescopiing lenses...(tho I have owned several)...shock from falling...moisture and dust magnets...to name a few...other than that I like your video presentation....American retired in Bangkok. Cheers
P.S. I have a set of extension tubes along with a FE 70-200/4.... short distance macro is not a problem....I generally run with a pair of original A7c bodies.
Thanks for the information and comment. some nice info
Thx Ben, i am currently thinking about those 2 lens as i would like to try wildlife with my a7r3. I was leaning toward the sony but now i think tamron might be the right choice for me because of its portability. Great review based on real life experience ! You got a new subscriber.
Thank you, they are both solid choices, if size and packaging is an issues then yes tamron is a solid choice for its size and weight it can really pack a punch.
One of the best reviews out there
Thank you so much!
Thank you so much Benjamin for this awesome review.
Thanks for the kind words!
Loved the vid/comparison. I have dreams of a Tamron 300 2.8.
Thanks, William! Yes hopfully more prime third party options are on the way. ✌️
I liked your review but you missed the point with the manual focus ring : it is like that because you can touch it with the same hand you are pushing the shot . So try a little and you see it’s very handy. It is not at all a mistake it is a practical idea compared with Sony where you need to use also the other hand , which by the way you are using it to sustain the lens . All the best , message from a user of this lens !
Thanks for the info. I dont have the lens anymore as it was a review unit. makes total sense what you are saying that now. Thanks
I am trying to decided between theses two for my A7 IV, leaning towards the Tamron. I already have their 20-40 and 35-150, and I think I can nicely fit all three in my bag. I fear if I got the Sony lens I would windup never taking it with me. Great review! I guess I can forgive the hat, this time.
Thanks for considering both options for your A7 IV. It sounds like the Tamron lens would complement your existing setup nicely, and having all three lenses in your bag sounds convenient. Plus, it's always a bonus when you can carry all your gear without feeling weighed down. And hey, I'm glad you enjoyed the review, hat and all! Let me know if you have any other questions as you make your decision.
Drive-by wildlife shooting 😳
Love this Benjamin! Keep up the great work! The Tamron certainly seems like a great bet for folks. Keep these reviews coming!
Thanks so much. Glad you enjoyed it!
Sony all day long for me build quality, performance,worth the money,on A7iv is fantastic
its a super lens!
Nice video, I would love to see the camera settings with the photos at the end.
Noted! will try to include that next time. Thank you
Super nice video, thank you very much 😊✌
Thanks so much Thomas! Means a lot to hear that✌️
perfect video, two lenses well compared
Thank you! Happy you engoyed it ✌️
Amazing review
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it.
Aperture is actually the same or better on the tamron all the way until 500.
It is but it changes to much throughout the zoom. Which I find worse for video work. Not a issue for photography as much, but for video having your aperture change is not ideal. I normally set it to its highest amount and work with that. ✌️
Great review.. I’m in between these two lenses. Used the Sony runs around 1500 as the tamron runs about 900. Thinking for travel the tamron would be a better fit? More compact, looking to get into birding with my Sony a7riii. I would have some crop capability and the price is almost 600 cheaper on the used market..
Thanks! I dont think you can go wrong with either of them. The Tamron is a solid choice, especially for travel. You have the crop factor of the Sony R series for the extra reach if you need it.
Great review, thanks !
Thanks for watching!
Nice video im really intrested in what the "camo" coat you have on the Sony is!
Thanks Matt. Its a LIFE+GUARD skin. My style is the MBGN version. Quite easy to put on but take your time with it as you only got one shot at it. ✌️
Is the Tamron 150-600 parfocal?
Not that i can remeber, it has been a while now but I think the breathing was well controlled.
Where I stay the Sigma 150-600 is cheaper than Tamron but some reviews say Sigma is bad with birds in flight. What do you recommend? Go for the reach or pick up Tamron and have the focusing ability
It's a hard one as both good lens. But if I was buying one today with my own money I would go for the tamron. But if you need that extra 100mm then I still think sigma is a nice option. Thanks 🙏
the Sony G is more attractive for me, it is large and heavy, and has 100mm extra of reach, but price and performance wise the tamron seems superior.
Yes its a super lens with a nice built in zoom and small focus throw.
@BenjaminSmail i have informed myself, and as with Sony 's non 70-200 zooms, they focus breathe a lot while having L tier minimum focus distance. The 200-600 when set to 600 and 3m (minimum focus distance) it is a 300mm f9.0
the Tamron becomes a 590mm f7.
And yes, focal reduction is completely avoidable, Sony is just lazy.
Hold up... that tripod mount on your door? where is this from?
its a Kirk WM-2 Multi-Purpose Window Mount for Tripod Head (Requires Head). Think i ordered it direct from them.
what is the lens window mount clamp ?
Kirk WM-2 Multi-Purpose Window Mount for Tripod Head. Still trying it out maybe video coming soon if you are intrested. It does not fit the best with my van door but works alot better in a car. ✌️
If the price difference between two would be $200 , would you pick sony or cheaper tamron?
I would pick the Sony just for the internal zoom and more range alone. Unless you need that smaller set up. Don't think there would be much difference with the auto focus between them. ✌️
sigma aug 4th 150-600mm new e mount lens
Very excited about the Sigma option to. See how it stacks up to the other options. Trying to get my hands on a review unit. Hopefully a review coming soon if sigma sends one out to me. ✌️
things are ugly at 600 mm due to atmosphere so that doesnt even matter
Yes depends on the location and how close the subject is of course. You can get close up details at 600 but of course the subject will still need to be a good distance
Oh look an idiot
It’s funny to hear that the tamron was faster in focusing, the sony focuses faster, this is obvious, the tamron has poor stabilization and sharpness at 500 mm, and the bokeh is worse, since there are only 7 aperture blades, versus 11 for the sony
Thanks for the comment
What I dislike about tamron telephoto is the dust spots appearing, they're like a hoover, even in your demo, you can see the dust spot
This is the only time I have used one. Would have to see on a long term use. I think the dust spots you see are on my Sony sensor, which really is dust hovers. ✌️
@@BenjaminSmail see I've found the sonys to be quite frankly a pain in the butt for dust, but I do love them, what I try and do I stay away from movable zoom lenses and now I'm sticking with fixed zoom, such as the 200-600 and the 70-200 G and Gm lenses, just to try and limit the dust particles from entering the sensor
@@BenjaminSmail yeah good shout, but that extra dust factor is a pain in the butt
@@ecohomeelectricsltd2007 My 200-600 G actually got a lot of dust on the front element ...
That clutch is like communism. Great on paper. Horrible in practice.
Yes got more annoying than anything else.
that comparison lol