E-mount Tele Zoom Comparison for Wildlife - Sony 200-600mm vs Sigma 150-600mm vs Tamron 150-500mm

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 203

  • @BrianWeeRekursiv
    @BrianWeeRekursiv 2 года назад +18

    Your quantification of the relative autofocus performance for the three lenses for birds in flight at 16:14 was extremely useful. I wished more RUclips content producers provided quantitative summary analyses.

  • @rollentrainer2762
    @rollentrainer2762 Год назад +15

    This is the test I have been looking for. Thanks for your work!

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  Год назад

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @kingghidorah8106
      @kingghidorah8106 Месяц назад

      @@MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons Hello, by late 2023 sigma released a firmware update that got you 5 stops of steadyshot at 600mm and increased autofocus torque. I saw a very recent test and the keeper rate nearly equaled that of the sony 200-600, thus surpassing the tamron.

  • @quintonmarchand5456
    @quintonmarchand5456 3 года назад +74

    I ended up getting the tamron 150-500! I little bit sad to give up the extra 100mm over the sony or the sigma, but I tested all three at my local camera store fist hand. For reference I was upgrading from the sigma 100-400, which had disappointing autofocus. But the margin between the tamron and sony autofocus compared to the size and price savings sold me. I actually prefer the color rendering out of the tamron, and the bokeh rendering feels comparable. So far I have been very happy with the results and don't mind missing the extra reach, especially when using my A7RIII and have plenty of cropping power.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  3 года назад +4

      Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Glad you’re enjoying the Tamron lens!

    • @WetDoggo
      @WetDoggo 2 года назад +1

      I ordered the Tamron as well... I'm curious how it will perform and if I stick with it.
      currently using 24-105G for almost everything on my a7iv
      I'm experimenting with macro tubes and an 16-50 on my a6600 to have a super tiny dedicated macro rig.

    • @CO8848_2
      @CO8848_2 Год назад +2

      I did the same, how did you find the Sigma 150-600 compared with the Tamron?

    • @rymdskrotet
      @rymdskrotet Год назад

      Thanks you for providing us this info, maybe helping the rest of us to take a decition - even if not possible to test it in store. I just got my a7 III and want to get into bird and mechanincal bird- photography (also known as planes). Not sure if 500 is too short? Also..can you extend the range which some sort of TC?

    • @mathu_stans
      @mathu_stans Год назад

      hi. after a very tough decision, i also ended up ordering the Tamron 150-500. it will arrive around Dec. i also shoot with A7R III

  • @joshuathomas4934
    @joshuathomas4934 Год назад +5

    Iv had the tamron 150-500 for about a year now. Using it for about 12 hours a week. It is a masterpiece. The difference between 500mm-600mm is not something to gripe about. Especially if you are using it on apsc. As it is even less pronounced. The autofocus is very accurate and consistent. The switches feel much nicer than the Sony. Love having that minimum focus distance for what I do.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  Год назад

      Thank you for the feedback. Great to hear you're liking the lens!

    • @allonwne
      @allonwne 3 месяца назад

      I have also had the Tamron for about a year also on APS-C. I use it mostly wide open at 500mm, but the close option at 150mm has been very useful a couple of times. Focus is fast and reliable. I'm also very happy with it.

  • @philipgowdy
    @philipgowdy 3 года назад +6

    So pleased your back, you were missed. Your honest and accurate non biased reviews are the tops on RUclips, especially for Bird photographers. Glad to see you in 2022. Keep up the great work..

  • @altynnazar
    @altynnazar Год назад +5

    I watched several videos, people in the comments choosing Tamron, I went with Tamron 150-500, I tested all 3 at my local camera shop, I didn’t regret going with Tamron

  • @firpofutbol
    @firpofutbol 2 года назад +5

    Nice review, glad to see the Tamron perform so well at that size and price point. That's going to be my next lens. Tony Northrup's channel also did a shootout amongst this zoom range and the Sigma came in last while Tamron was top 5 and the Sony top 3 which is to be expected.

  • @jorisaurik3824
    @jorisaurik3824 2 года назад +3

    Very extensive and full depth comparison, thumbs up! Job well done on this review. I was doubting between the Sigma and the Tamron, but seeing your review makes me want to go with the Tamron.

  • @ewanmackenzie6777
    @ewanmackenzie6777 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks Mathieu, I was looking at the Sigma and the Tamron, so you have helped me make a decision!

  • @340314rod
    @340314rod 8 месяцев назад +1

    Great comparison of the 3 zooms. I am very pleased with the purchase of my Tamron 150-500 which I just got yesterday. Your video helped a lot. Good work. THAMKS. Rodrigo

  • @donniezhang4890
    @donniezhang4890 3 года назад +2

    This is one of the most detailed and best reviewed videos I've seen, and it helped me a lot with my choice,

  • @nataliagale5679
    @nataliagale5679 Год назад +2

    Very helpful and thorough review. Thank you! It helped me decide which lens to go for. I decided for the Tamron. Pretty impressed with it's performance and quality in comparison to the other two, even if I am compromising on length.

  • @skyunlimitedvisualmedia
    @skyunlimitedvisualmedia Год назад +2

    Best lens comparison video I’ve seen, thanks for the comparison images with great description and commentary. 👍😎

  • @pics7161
    @pics7161 3 года назад +2

    Excellent video as always. Good detailed analysis and presentation. You are the only truly objective source of camera gear around so please keep up your excellent work as I rely on your reviews for wildlife and birds. Thanks.

  • @cohoonatube
    @cohoonatube 2 года назад +6

    Outstanding video, thank you for the detailed comparison! New Sony A7iv owner coming from Z6ii purely for the E Mount lens eco-system. Needing a Super Tele is what sold me. Glad to hear to the Tammy is a great option as I've been very impressed with my other 2 Tammy lenses so far. I was shocked to find I preferred the 28-200 over my Superb Nikkor 24-200! (I do miss the 24mm reach, but purchased the Tamron 20/2.8 to compesnate).

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад +2

      Yes, Tamron is doing a good job with the E-mount system!

    • @allonwne
      @allonwne 3 месяца назад +1

      Do you like the 20.2.8? I'm wondering about that one.

  • @craigcarlson4022
    @craigcarlson4022 2 месяца назад

    Mathieu, Back here reconsidering the Tamron option, now that it is available in the Nikon Z mount, which is my system. I'm writing here just to thank you for such an incredibly detailed yet concise review, with great methodology. I'm a long-time subscriber of your channel. Best regards, Craig

  • @christiang-berg8490
    @christiang-berg8490 3 года назад +4

    Thanks so much for this video! Bought a A9 recently (gave up my old Fuji-system) with the Tamron 28-75 and 70-180 and are looking for a "super-tele-photo" as well. This videos is really useful! ☺

  • @mlecz19
    @mlecz19 8 месяцев назад

    I've watched last few days maybe 20 reviews about those 3 but it was sales talk! But your review is just great ! Honest so much ! thank YOU !

  • @ForrestWest
    @ForrestWest 3 года назад +3

    Thanks for a very informative video! I don't like the big knob on the lens hood of the sigma or the tripod foot that could not easily be used as a handle or completely removed. Just those things alone make it a no-go for me. I'm loving my 200 to 600mm on my Sony.

  • @andrear9500
    @andrear9500 3 года назад +1

    Great to see you again.
    Very comprehensive comparison. Thanks

  • @michaelwhiles5282
    @michaelwhiles5282 3 года назад +1

    Welcome back ! Almost 6 months... trust you & your Wife/ Partner are well and OK.

  • @WobbleMatic
    @WobbleMatic 2 года назад +3

    What a superb review and beautifully produced and presented. Thank you.

  • @Patrick-vi9xr
    @Patrick-vi9xr 2 года назад

    Best comparison I've seen so far, perfect presentation of results, thanks for video! Superb job!

  • @WillemvanderPijl
    @WillemvanderPijl Год назад +1

    I managed to get an amazon return deal on the 200-600 for less money even than the tamron. Fingers crossed everything is alright with the lens

  • @MojtabaParvaneh
    @MojtabaParvaneh 2 года назад +1

    In terms of videography, which one do you think is better?

  • @wildinthejardin
    @wildinthejardin 6 месяцев назад

    Hello at 24:53 what do you mean "Higher resolution versus APS-C mode" ? from my understanding if you use APS-C mode on the Sony "R" it will just crop the picture "realtime" not better than a photoshop crop, you will not reach more distance and worse you will get less FOV to follow the bird as it will be reduced by the realtime crop.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  6 месяцев назад

      No, I say that if you own a Sony camera with a high resolution sensor, you can take advantage of the APS-C mode to get extra reach, or crop in post. It's the same thing, but the APS-C mode makes the subject bigger in the frame, which can be useful at times.

  • @ForrestWest
    @ForrestWest 3 года назад +4

    My 200-600mm on the A7iii creates a really pleasant bokeh when I'm shooting nature and wildlife and there's some distance between the subject and the background. Also when the background is closer I still get some nice dreamy looking layers especially when there's some backlighting. Over all very pleased with the lens.

    • @subramanianb
      @subramanianb 3 года назад

      Useful information. Pls let me know about the video quality. I am planning to buy this lens for Bird photography

  • @madcat1007
    @madcat1007 4 месяца назад

    Nice video, thanks. Do you turn off Vibration Compensation when using these lenses on a tripod?

  • @ralphfrattura
    @ralphfrattura 3 года назад +1

    Nice, even-handed, detailed review. I'm now a subscriber.

  • @jannik6147
    @jannik6147 2 года назад +4

    as someone with an a6000 and a tight budget ill probably settle for the tamron. whilst the 70-350 is even cheaper i think its not tight enough for me :(

  • @rufmor1
    @rufmor1 Год назад +1

    Best review of this cameras, hands down

  • @Vishnushj036
    @Vishnushj036 Год назад +1

    Thank you for the video.Helped me to find my tele lens

  • @damianpiotrowski4438
    @damianpiotrowski4438 3 года назад +2

    An excellent very informative review! Thank You!

  • @jeroenvdw
    @jeroenvdw 2 года назад +2

    Perfect review! I was comparing the Sony with the Sigma, another review said that the Sony was better at subjects moving towards the camera and that the 1.4x tc is not worth it since the sharpness gets a lot worse, but you actually said the sharpness doesn't get affected a lot with the tc so it might be a QC issue. I never thought I'd give the Tamron a chance since it let's in less light and is 500mm instead of 600mm. After this review I'm wondering if I should buy the Sony or the Tamron 😂

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад +1

      Thanks. I guess it depends if you need (or will need) the teleconverters.

    • @jeroenvdw
      @jeroenvdw 2 года назад

      @@MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons Yeah i'm planning on using the lens to photograph wildlife of any kind, also on safari's. So I guess I'll need the TC.

  • @jackthemurray
    @jackthemurray 2 года назад +1

    Great video! Thank's for sharing! Just rented the Tamron 150-500 for use with my A7III. No matter what I did, I couldn't get a single image sharp and clearly focused past 300mm. It was a rental lens so I'm hoping that was the issue - but the image quality I got was NOWHERE near what I'm seeing in your demos. I'm new to bird photography but know a thing or two about cameras so I don't think it was any settings issues on my part. Wondering if you have any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks!

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад

      Hi Jack, sorry to hear you had a bad experience with the Tamron.
      It is possible you rented a bad copy, these things happen with lenses. Recently I had to ask a second sample of a Fuji lens because the first had an optical quality issue.
      Sony cameras are not difficult to configure for wildlife, so I doubt there was something wrong on your camera. The only thing I can think of is maybe you were using shutter speeds that were too slow for the camera/lens IS to handle past 300mm?

    • @allonwne
      @allonwne 3 месяца назад

      I've taken hundreds, possibly thousands, of images with mine at 500mm. The only failures have been operator error. I use it hand held (sometimes partly supported by leaning it on a tree), never tried it on a tripod. Is it possible that you had the shake reduction on on a tripod? I'm using the A6700 at ISO levels I would not have dreamed of only a couple of years ago.

  • @diegoramirez6165
    @diegoramirez6165 9 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you Mathieu, as always very usefull and professional your videos.

  • @stowgood
    @stowgood 8 месяцев назад

    This is a great video. I have the sony 200-600 and I am not sure I could cope with it being any heavier. 60mm at the widest is very very appealing though.

  • @knowyouryoga
    @knowyouryoga 3 года назад

    Hello I own an A7iii I'm planning to buy either 200-600 or Sigma 150-600 since it's 40 percent cheap where I stay what do you recommend

  • @OlegAlferev
    @OlegAlferev 2 года назад +1

    Thank you for super test! Have a more video and nice photos!

  • @TITAOSTEIN
    @TITAOSTEIN 3 года назад +5

    Another great review! Interesting to see the quality, portability and price of FF options. Although I work with Nikon (apsc and Z), Lumix (m43 only) and Olympus. For wildlife I use Olympus only. A matter of custom and portability. I'm usually more active for Wildlife in European summer (Germany, France and Spain) and South American summer (Brazil and Argentina), always lots of Light! I would like to see a reaction from the m43 system, offering new Cameras, new sensors, new AF and AI technologies, new and excellent lenses (compact and durable), and with more attractive prices compared to FF! My greatest pleasure is being in nature, and the equipment MUST be compact. I don't want Bazookas and tripods. Fingers crossed for the m43 system! If not, I'll just use Nikon.

  • @MichalOlender
    @MichalOlender 2 года назад +1

    Thank you for the video, definitely leaning towards Tamron!

  • @TillGroos
    @TillGroos 11 месяцев назад

    Hi Mathieu, have you had a chance to review the Sigma 150-600mm after it got it's firmware update to version 3? One of the changes is "Improved tracking performance when the camera’s focus mode is set to AF-C". Would be cool to see, if the only real minus on the Sigma lens is gone now.
    But anyway, thanks for the good video

  • @josemanuelnovo725
    @josemanuelnovo725 11 месяцев назад

    Buen video, para una sony a 6700, cual de los tres recomiendas teniendo en cuenta calidad precio, thanks.

  • @jonathancamacho4837
    @jonathancamacho4837 9 месяцев назад

    Sorry, I have an important question, is it possible to use the sony 2x teleconverter in the Tamron 500mm lens? I'll use it for surf photography & the tanrom likes me cause it's light & portable. But really I want to know if there's a chance to use the teleconverter on it

  • @alperaksan
    @alperaksan 3 года назад

    Which one should i to buy for birding Sigma 150-600mm or Tamron 150-600mm?

  • @chrisburnard5157
    @chrisburnard5157 Год назад +1

    Really great review, thank you.

  • @MattSteez
    @MattSteez 3 года назад +1

    Great video! We’ll done comparing the 3 lenses!

  • @edkelly145
    @edkelly145 2 года назад

    Do you always shoot with stabilization on when you shoot BIF? Great review. Thanks. If so # 2 for panning or # 3 ?

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад +1

      The honest answer is that often, I forget to check which setting I have :-)
      More seriously, I choose #2 for panning, or #3 for static subjects. That said, if you are working with a shutter speed of 1/2000s, or similar, it doesn't make a lot of difference having OSS on or off.

  • @culebreitor
    @culebreitor 8 месяцев назад

    Thank you very mucho for the review.
    2 years later, considering all the software updates releases, do you still thinking that the sigma is "the worse" of these 3 lenses?
    I was thinking about buying the sigma because of the 600mm focal, not considering the Tamron, but now I don't know what to do. Here in Spain, there is about 500e difference between the Sony (1560e) and the Sigma (1100e), being the Tamron the cheapest one at 1019e. What would you do looking this price difference?
    (Sony a7iii user)
    Thanks again!

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  8 месяцев назад

      I haven't tested the Sigma with the latest firmware update, so can't comment on the improvements.
      The difference between 500mm and 600mm is not huge, so I would personally get the Tamron.

  • @fjrc58
    @fjrc58 2 года назад

    Thanks Mathieu for this extensive and deep review of the three big zooms for Sony!! I just got tha Tamron 150-500 and it is working very well as you say, but I have noticed a continuous whinning noise audible only in a silent place, not outside. The noise can be listened from the very on of the camera, without touching anything and no matter the AF or the VC are on or off. Did you notice something similar when you used the Tamron?

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад

      Hi Javier, no I didn't really notice any unusual noise. Is it quite loud?

    • @fjrc58
      @fjrc58 2 года назад

      @@MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons Thank you very much Mathieu for your answer! No, the noise is not loud, I can only hear it when everything is quiet. Not outside, where the noise of nature is louder and prevents from hearing it.
      I have seen that other people have notice the same noise, but not everybody. It may be dependent on the specific unit of the lens. At any rate, th lens performs very well, as you say. I am very happy with it.

    • @allonwne
      @allonwne 3 месяца назад

      Mine has this noise, but I can only hear it inside. No animals, insects or plants! have reacted to it up to now.

  • @PatrickWithCamera
    @PatrickWithCamera 2 года назад

    Great comparison! Probably best over internet.
    Is tamron with firmware update or without? Because stabilization got little improvement after update

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад

      Not sure, when did the firmware come out?

    • @PatrickWithCamera
      @PatrickWithCamera 2 года назад +1

      ok sorry for question, didn't read date, firmware update was this month, so you couldn't test with update :D

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад

      Oh I see, I missed the news. If they improved the stabilization, that’s a good thing. Unfortunately, I don’t have the lens anymore so I can’t double check myself.

  • @IanHobday
    @IanHobday 3 года назад +1

    A recent super-tele comparison review on a different channel mentioned that the Sony has such severe focus breathing that on close subjects (such as small birds) it's actually providing the magnification of about a 350mm lens. Adding extension tubes between the lens and body fixes it but of course that's a giant PITA and puts some big limits on max focusing distance. Would love to see someone else double-check their work.

  • @rakelyribeiro8277
    @rakelyribeiro8277 2 года назад

    I am in between the Tamron and de sigma. I literally don’t know what to do ahahaha I guess the final decision will be after testing in person. Thanks for the amazing review

  • @cameraprepper7938
    @cameraprepper7938 3 года назад +1

    Fine review, I have got the Sony 200-600, but I do not like zoom Lenses and this are too heavy and big. I wish for prime tele Lenses like 300mm 4.0, 400mm 4.5 and 500mm 5.6.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  3 года назад

      Yes! Following Nikon’s example would be great.

    • @allonwne
      @allonwne 3 месяца назад

      Tamron has a lightweight 500mm f/5.6 now. It 's expensive though.

  • @masguapoako
    @masguapoako 3 года назад

    Went owl photography the last couple with days with my 70-200mm, and it's not cutting it, I'm going to upgrade to this one

  • @mathu_stans
    @mathu_stans Год назад +1

    this info here at 9:47 was very helpful

  • @ashtonrobertson7420
    @ashtonrobertson7420 2 года назад

    This is exactly the video I needed to see. Thank you!

  • @diegoramirez6165
    @diegoramirez6165 Год назад +1

    Had you tested the tamron 50 400?

  • @Picplosions
    @Picplosions Год назад +1

    Really helpful video, thank you so much!

  • @WetDoggo
    @WetDoggo 2 года назад +2

    really good and structured video 👌

  • @jakeahud476
    @jakeahud476 Год назад

    Hello, is it possible to use Sony a mount lens on canon eos r ?

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  Год назад

      Technically, I don't think it would be impossible, but I'm not aware of any adapter designed for that specific combination.

  • @diegoramirez6165
    @diegoramirez6165 Год назад +1

    Mathieu thanks for this professional video!!

  • @juanjohntramos7196
    @juanjohntramos7196 2 года назад

    How can I use Sigma 500 or 600 mm lens , with canon eos , 4000 D ?

  • @heidismerek4163
    @heidismerek4163 2 года назад +2

    Native lenses are always going to work better with the camera, however not everyone can afford the native lens. I tried the Tamron and it’s not a horrible lens but it wasn’t for me. I wasn’t happy with the results I was getting. If you can swing it, go with the native lens.

  • @vincentgerardlachainedupsy
    @vincentgerardlachainedupsy 2 года назад +1

    Vidéo très complète et très éclairante ...malheureusement j'avais déjà acheté le Sigma et le Tamron me fait plus que de l'œil car le Sigma est vraiment difficile à employer à main levée.

  • @sohrubjoshi5189
    @sohrubjoshi5189 Год назад

    Can you also test Tamron 150-600 G2 version please

  • @maggnet4829
    @maggnet4829 Год назад +1

    Sigma is currently developing a firmware update to improve the auto focus and image stabilization on the 150-600. Should do a retest afterwards.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  Год назад +1

      Nice from Sigma to do that. Not sure when I’ll have the chance to test the lens again though.

    • @maggnet4829
      @maggnet4829 Год назад

      @Mathieu Gasquet Indeed, it is. They promise 5-6 stops of image stabilization with the update and improved AF.

  • @juanjohntramos7196
    @juanjohntramos7196 2 года назад

    I have canon eos 4000d how can I use this Len on this camera ?

  • @HernanBerwart
    @HernanBerwart 3 года назад +1

    Thank you. Great comparison

  • @Roy88772
    @Roy88772 6 месяцев назад

    Interesting results, My tests on the A6700 came to completely opposite conclusions. The Sigma was the best and almost all photos were sharp. From the Tamron and especially from the Sony, many photos, even though the AF point was in the right place, looked as if there was back focus or front focus. The Sigma, on the other hand, did not have this problem, although it was slightly slower. However, it definitely had the best stabilization.

  • @kingghidorah8106
    @kingghidorah8106 3 месяца назад

    woah, the tamron lens is such a beast, hard to believe how far they gone now. They were quite mid tier between 2010 and 2020.

  • @mickue
    @mickue 2 года назад

    This video helped me so much. Thank you!

  • @marc_likes_marketing
    @marc_likes_marketing 5 месяцев назад

    i bought the tamron last week ($1,199 at bh). i was pleasantly surprised by the autofocus. i felt like a few overall images were a hair soft, but that's probably because i mostly shoot at f/11. i will try a faster aperture, since that's recommended in the video. maybe f/8 will be a better compromise, though, since i like less bokeh with wildlife shots. regardless, it was a very enjoyable experience, and i had like 10 people stop me to ask about the lens, since it's a looker.

  • @trowawayacc
    @trowawayacc 3 года назад

    Man cant wait to get the fuji telefoto review, when they finally become available.

  • @nightcoder5k
    @nightcoder5k 3 года назад +1

    Great lenses review. Thank you.

  • @andresgonzalezcerda7635
    @andresgonzalezcerda7635 3 года назад +3

    As usual, Best lens Review.
    As a M43 user, this tamron plus A7iii are getting very close In price to the last M43 arena where still wins. Zoom / price/ size.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  3 года назад +1

      Thank you. Yes the 150-500 was a smart move from Tamron. Although the 2x crop factor of m4/3 is useful for wildlife.

  • @chandreshmaheshwari9196
    @chandreshmaheshwari9196 2 года назад

    Can you do review on
    Sony 200-600 mm vs Nikon 200-500mm lens

  • @tfrensch
    @tfrensch Год назад

    There is an update available for the sigma for better autofocus speed. Would be interesting, if you could add this to your test.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  Год назад

      Thanks, I'm aware but to be honest, I don't know when I'll have the chance to test the lens again.

  • @jootai
    @jootai 5 месяцев назад

    Thanks for your work!

  • @81neuron
    @81neuron Год назад +1

    good review, thank you

  • @denisrandomtech5822
    @denisrandomtech5822 3 года назад +4

    Nice review. I think that m43 still has an edge. In my opinion for full frame cameras 600mm is the minimum requirement for serious wildlife shooting.

    • @HH60gPaveHawk
      @HH60gPaveHawk 2 года назад +4

      Having used both, I’d say full frame is still my preference. I think 500mm is more than enough, especially with an A1 or A7RIV where you have tons of crop. The advantage in low light performance and huge advantage in AF have me way happier than I was with my EM1ii and PL100-400. Far more keepers. I wish I preferred MFT for sure, it’s a fair bit lighter.

  • @josemanuelnovo725
    @josemanuelnovo725 5 месяцев назад

    Me puedes decir la diferencia en el sony en el modo de estabilización 1 y 3

  • @kmorrisontube
    @kmorrisontube 2 года назад +1

    Great review!

  • @danielling792
    @danielling792 2 года назад

    EXCELLENT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

  • @mongini1
    @mongini1 4 месяца назад +1

    and now, 2 years later, the Sony comes in at 1499€, the sigma is pretty stable at 1350€ compared to 999€ for the Tamron... was a No-Brainer for me at this point

  • @lldd11
    @lldd11 2 года назад

    Is this Sigma Sports? Or Sigma Contemporary?

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  2 года назад

      1:19
      But it's the Sports version designed for mirrorless cameras, not the one available for DSLRs.

  • @lorenzogattaldo3764
    @lorenzogattaldo3764 3 года назад

    Thank you, excellent review.

  • @ritamoll4347
    @ritamoll4347 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for the great video.

  • @michaelkaercher
    @michaelkaercher Год назад +1

    Nice comparison.

  • @madmike2881
    @madmike2881 2 года назад +1

    Nice video, thank you!

  • @ziga551
    @ziga551 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you very much for ur video 👏

  • @myhealthobs5290
    @myhealthobs5290 2 года назад

    The dust is a problem in the tamron, never seen anything like it

  • @thilinaalagiyawanna3680
    @thilinaalagiyawanna3680 Год назад +1

    Thank you

  • @talcohen4010
    @talcohen4010 3 года назад +1

    Really good video!

  • @MT-gh5hf
    @MT-gh5hf 3 года назад +1

    excellent review

  • @keystonebrotherb
    @keystonebrotherb 3 года назад +1

    Just picked up a mint 150-600 for $1100. Waiting on my A7iv.

    • @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons
      @MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons  3 года назад

      Good price! I received my A7 IV yesterday. Let me know how do you find the combo after you start using it.

    • @vivash2785
      @vivash2785 3 года назад

      where did you buy it???

    • @keystonebrotherb
      @keystonebrotherb 3 года назад

      @@vivash2785
      Quan Tran is my go to guy from Dallas. Highly recommended.

    • @keystonebrotherb
      @keystonebrotherb 3 года назад

      @@vivash2785
      $1299 deal on B&H today only.

  • @johnrichardson1796
    @johnrichardson1796 2 года назад

    Excellent, thanks 👍

  • @wildinthejardin
    @wildinthejardin 6 месяцев назад

    I actually own a RX10IV, very satisfied, amazing capabilities for a 1" sensor with 600mm max zoom and 72cm min focus distance but ... low light is a pain because of the 1" sensor (LR new AI denoise can do miracles but not always), and when I go out I want to be able to get far birds and deers as clsoe butterflies and bees. The Tamron may be the one that would make me switch from RX10 to FF camera but missing custom button is a problem as I want to instantly switch to my BIF mode settings to catch a bird in flight (I assigned RX10 custom button to auto tracking mode + 1/1000 + 10fps + 1EV) and the sony cameras do not have for example front custom button like Panasonic that could be temporaly pushed with the same hand that old the camera.

  • @pistolasphoto5674
    @pistolasphoto5674 2 года назад +1

    A very nicely made video, with helpful and clear informations. My choice - already a view days ago - was the Sony 200-600 mm in combo with my A7RIII 😇

  • @serena-yu
    @serena-yu 2 года назад +1

    2:22 I have been using 200-600 for a long time. There is absolutely no chance for 200-600 to zoom creep from gravity, due to its inner zoom design. From lots of practical usage, I can confidently say a zoom lock is useless