I've always found it interesting the migration pattern we see from the Eurasian steppe. Indo-europeans, Indo-Iranians, Finns, Alans, Turks, and Mongols all basically used it as a highway to travel halfway across the continent before settling down and becoming sedentary. It's weird to think that the Indo-Europeans were once also basically a steppe horde traveling across the plain, and that there were probably cultures before them who did the same.
You forgot the Hittites/Anatolian branch. Also Proto-Germanic only expanded south from Scandinavia and the coastal area of Germany well into the Iron Age.
I have heard that Proto Anatolian language branched off from Pre-Proto Indo-European(Proto Indo-Hittite). According to a statistic, Yamnaya like people(Western Steppe Herders) seemed to be hybrid race between Eastern European Hunter Gatherers(EHG) and Caucasian Hunter Getherers(CHG), but little genome from EHG was found from Ancient Anatolians remains, but that of CHG was found among them.
Yes they are. Armenian and Anatolian are both categorized as Indo-European. The same way Persian, and Sanskrit are as well. Its literally in the name INDO + EUROPEAN@@vxnatus6039
@@insectilluminatigetshrekt5574Someone who has a genetic inheritance from the Corded ware or Catacomb culture. Armenians have it, albeit a little, and their paternal lineage is mostly Indo-European. But there is not a drop of steppe genetic heritage in the Elite Hittite samples.
Some errors: No mention of the Indo-Anatolians or Armenians Showed Kurds (Iranians) populating Western Armenia pre WWI. Albanians are Illyrian Shows the Etruscans as indo Europeans No phrygians in Anatolia Greeks populated ALL of Anatolia until the 1000s AD
@@anthrosapien3784 Same, nice video but the Celts didn't exist in 1600 BCE, it started in central Europe around 1200 BCE before spreading in western Europe, but it doesn't mean that the western european population wasn't indo-european before the migrations of the Celts from central Europe, it became indo-european around 2500 BCE (source : fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Europ%C3%A9ens, "Résultats de la paléogénétique à l'appui de l'hypothèse kourgane ", use google translate because it's the french version).
Kurds didnt populate Western Armenia after WWI...? What load of BS is that. Search up the Marwanid dynasty, Shaddadids, and many other Kurdish empires/states that were formed in east Anatolia/armenia and south Caucasus as early as the 9th and 10th centuries, long before Seljuk Turks ever arrived in Anatolia
@Ben O Brien Not true at all. Kurds were a majority in many towns and cities. Kurds and Armenians overlapped each other and many lived side by side. After WW1, the Kurds took over all Armenian towns and villages
@Ben O Brien how is it not true? It is easily proven if you read the history of the region. The Kurdish Marwanid dynasty is a clear example, in the 10th century they had control over most of eastern Anatolia/Western Armenia and their capital was Diyarbakir. And around the same time, the Kurdish Shaddaddid Dynasty ruled parts of modern day Armenia and Azerbaijan, even intermarrying into the Bagratuni royal family of Armenia at the time. Even one of the most famous Georgian dynasty’s, the Zakarids, who fought to keep the independence of Georgia, were of Kurdish origins. Kurds have been in that area for a long long time
Not bad but very simplified, I think that diagonal lines with different colours should be used, e.g. if about Early Middle Ages in the continental Western Europe, Germanic tribes (Goths, Franks, Suebi, Langobards and later Normanns) occupied Romance territories in some cases mixed with Celtic (Gallia/France) or Greek (Italy) inhabitants so there lands had mixed Indo-European population, Romance+Celtic+Germanic+Greek.
I'll admit that this video was somewhat rushed since I had exams during the early part of the vidoe and had to work on it on and off so there are quiet a few inaccuracies in the video though now that it's March break I'm planning to release a video similar to this one on the history of the Turkic people before the end of March break🤞🏼
There's a mistake in the Italian peninsula. The Etruscans were a well known culture that wasn't Indo-European and was located in North-Central Italy before and during the origins of Rome and you're showing an Indo-European migration there from the moment the italic people arrive to the peninsula. Etruria became Indo-European much later when it was invaded by Rome and adopted Latin.
Good video, but you missed the true origin, it was northern and North western India , the true abode and origin of The Vedic Aryans and not the steppes of Eurassia. Please correct the video and upload!. Remember Sanskrit is the oldest Indo European language and it has been truly exclusive to India! Shubham Bhawatu!
@@anthrosapien3784 Armenian are indo european and it was not iranian branch rather Anatolian branch. Also there were Phrygians, Lydians and Hittites that is considered indo european languages. Celts settled in center Anatolia and were called Galatians and spoke Celtic Galatians from 3th century BC to 3th century AD. Also greek had spread over all western Anatolia before 1000AD.
@@anthrosapien3784 There is no such thing like "genetically Indo-European". The Indo-European feature is a linguistic and cultural one. And even the branches you depicted are genetically distinct from each other, and full of non-stepparian ancestries too. I can't even imagine how Hittites could be less genetically stepparian compared to the overmixed and creolized Germanic peoples.
so how to interp this , the years they settled trough europe they took over and we europeans are all decendants of them ? where did the native people go who already lived in europe ?
Some peoples of Europe, descendants of ancient Europeans - Sardinians, Basques, Mediterranean and Balkan Europeans, Sami, partly Scandinavians, Caucasians
Archaeology, genetics and linguistics have proven that these cultures separated from the Indo-European Yamnaya culture. And this has nothing to do with the Turks😉
Indo-Aryans were already in the Indian subcontinent by 1500CE, which is the official concensus of the date of the composition of rgveda. Their entry is shown too late. Same with the Iranian branch, they got a whole empire spanning the full extent of Iran and then some by 500BCE. And if you are including greek migrants, then you should have mitanni aryan subculture, the alans, the Kushans, who are considered to be of tocharian origin, and the IA migrants to Sri lanka and Indo-China.
@@turro3212This video doesn't just talk about racial groups, but about language, and the dark green color is marked on the graph as Hispanic, in Brazil we speak Portuguese and there are more descendants of Portuguese and Italians than Spanish. Finland and Hungary are racially European, but according to linguists they do not speak an Indo-European language which is why they are marked as white in this graph.
@@jacobjonm0511 This haplogroups (E,G,I,J and more) among the sea peoples and anatolian farmers, who switched to their language, they themselves R1b sorry for my english, i'm not a native english speaker
I have heard that Proto Anatolian language branched off from Pre-Proto Indo-European(Proto Indo-Hittite). According to a statistic, Yamnaya like people(Western Steppe Herders) seemed to be hybrid race between Eastern European Hunter Gatherers(EHG) and Caucasian Hunter Getherers(CHG), but little genome from EHG was found from Ancient Anatolians remains, but that of CHG was found among them.
Good effort but not entirely correct. Canada has a massive Scottish genetic footprint so should be more Celtic ditto Australia and New Zealand. Due to the highland clearances and Irish famines you find Scottish and Irish names over represented in white majority former colonies.
Jews were dispersed across Europe and often intermixed with local European so many Israelis are technically mixed though only a few dots are shown in Israel
I think he added Ashkenazi jews who speak Ashkenazi language which is a Germanic language under the indo-european family. They are linguistically indo-european but ethnically Semitic.
Since when Macedonia is Greek ??? Since when Macedonians are Greeks ? In -330 bc, Macedonian Kingdom conquered all Greece. In the 6th century, all balkan and Greece was conquered by Slavs !!! You should mention it !!!!!!!
кроме того чмобик там территории тех фрицев совсем мизерные а что касается всяких посольств консульств торговых представительств охранных гарнизонов прочих а большая часть того там например у франции британии голандии бельгии
а вот по мордору давно повазвращалась монголо китайщина комрада мао с компашкой и в прошлый век оно не было не было так как в средневековье в прошлом веке масштабы террора совсем иные причем сразу и за рейх и за китай
кроме того так званые славяне южные западные восточные никогда не были и близко в таких границах даже когда тусили по невриде всякие там уличи торки вятичи дрогобычи радимычи кривичи ятвяги и т д и т п то было не славянами а балтами и не чистыми балтами а разбавленными пришлым нашествием европы которое вместе с теми балтами к тому времени уже века как ассимилированы булгарией как и большая часть европы
правда есть ньюанс с краденных территорий дохерища утилизировано а кто не добит вывезен в гетто при этом там осталось дохера местных в гетто азии тоже самое касается прочих короче чуток севера чуток центральной азии чуток дальнего востока полесья слобожанщины донщины стародубщины кубани кавказа северного еще выжили
особенно учитывая куда уебывало население серого и зеленого клинов в прошлом веке от бойни ну там к ним еще 9 краев забайкальский амурский уссурийский с азиатами разделенные
кроме того чмобик фрицев в начале прошлого века в мордоре оставалось всего 2 области саратовская и волгоградская да и те свалили к шведам в ингерманляндию в унру и в мкад
также это пиздабольство не учитывает джунгарские монгольские ойраты которые бездарно убивались с дунганами о китай половиной а второй половиной о ногайскую орду и горцев о жузы казаха узбека кыргыза бездарно безрезультатно и весь 18 век до красной книги до жалкой калмыкии в остатках кроме того оно убивалось и о кызылбаш и о янычарню и о казакию которая естественно не стояли в стороне
не говоря уже о таком сброде поверх финоугорской андрофагии азийской как изгои сувары татары сибирские татары башкирские татары ебанутейшего наровчата исламодатели 10 века енисейские кыргызы уйгуры а это еще и близко не ак орда кок орда большая орда
![mgk - I Think I’m OKAY (with YUNGBLUD) (Sad Version) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7AC1uqQLIg4/mqdefault.jpg)
I've always found it interesting the migration pattern we see from the Eurasian steppe. Indo-europeans, Indo-Iranians, Finns, Alans, Turks, and Mongols all basically used it as a highway to travel halfway across the continent before settling down and becoming sedentary. It's weird to think that the Indo-Europeans were once also basically a steppe horde traveling across the plain, and that there were probably cultures before them who did the same.
You forgot the Hittites/Anatolian branch. Also Proto-Germanic only expanded south from Scandinavia and the coastal area of Germany well into the Iron Age.
Sri Lanka and the Maldives missing too
I have heard that Proto Anatolian language branched off from Pre-Proto Indo-European(Proto Indo-Hittite). According to a statistic, Yamnaya like people(Western Steppe Herders) seemed to be hybrid race between Eastern European Hunter Gatherers(EHG) and Caucasian Hunter Getherers(CHG), but little genome from EHG was found from Ancient Anatolians remains, but that of CHG was found among them.
What about Anatolian and Armenian languages?
They aren’t indo European, ethnic wise
@@vxnatus6039 how do you define "ethnically indo european"?
Yes they are. Armenian and Anatolian are both categorized as Indo-European. The same way Persian, and Sanskrit are as well. Its literally in the name INDO + EUROPEAN@@vxnatus6039
@@insectilluminatigetshrekt5574Someone who has a genetic inheritance from the Corded ware or Catacomb culture. Armenians have it, albeit a little, and their paternal lineage is mostly Indo-European. But there is not a drop of steppe genetic heritage in the Elite Hittite samples.
@@vitocorleone9456 by that metric, shouldn't Fins and Hungarians have been included in the video? Genetics =/= language
Some errors:
No mention of the Indo-Anatolians or Armenians
Showed Kurds (Iranians) populating Western Armenia pre WWI.
Albanians are Illyrian
Shows the Etruscans as indo Europeans
No phrygians in Anatolia
Greeks populated ALL of Anatolia until the 1000s AD
Thanks for the feedback
@@anthrosapien3784 Same, nice video but the Celts didn't exist in 1600 BCE, it started in central Europe around 1200 BCE before spreading in western Europe, but it doesn't mean that the western european population wasn't indo-european before the migrations of the Celts from central Europe, it became indo-european around 2500 BCE (source : fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Europ%C3%A9ens, "Résultats de la paléogénétique à l'appui de l'hypothèse kourgane
", use google translate because it's the french version).
Kurds didnt populate Western Armenia after WWI...? What load of BS is that. Search up the Marwanid dynasty, Shaddadids, and many other Kurdish empires/states that were formed in east Anatolia/armenia and south Caucasus as early as the 9th and 10th centuries, long before Seljuk Turks ever arrived in Anatolia
@Ben O Brien Not true at all. Kurds were a majority in many towns and cities. Kurds and Armenians overlapped each other and many lived side by side. After WW1, the Kurds took over all Armenian towns and villages
@Ben O Brien how is it not true? It is easily proven if you read the history of the region. The Kurdish Marwanid dynasty is a clear example, in the 10th century they had control over most of eastern Anatolia/Western Armenia and their capital was Diyarbakir. And around the same time, the Kurdish Shaddaddid Dynasty ruled parts of modern day Armenia and Azerbaijan, even intermarrying into the Bagratuni royal family of Armenia at the time. Even one of the most famous Georgian dynasty’s, the Zakarids, who fought to keep the independence of Georgia, were of Kurdish origins. Kurds have been in that area for a long long time
Very interesting, thank you for your hard work!
Indo Aryans split earlier and migrated to India earlier than you showed
Some parts are inexplicably not colored when they should be
Not bad but very simplified, I think that diagonal lines with different colours should be used, e.g. if about Early Middle Ages in the continental Western Europe, Germanic tribes (Goths, Franks, Suebi, Langobards and later Normanns) occupied Romance territories in some cases mixed with Celtic (Gallia/France) or Greek (Italy) inhabitants so there lands had mixed Indo-European population, Romance+Celtic+Germanic+Greek.
Damn the Iranians got nerfed 😢
چرا.
Turks
I'll admit that this video was somewhat rushed since I had exams during the early part of the vidoe and had to work on it on and off so there are quiet a few inaccuracies in the video though now that it's March break I'm planning to release a video similar to this one on the history of the Turkic people before the end of March break🤞🏼
Bad music choice
@@arta.xshaca
Yok'
Pre Celtic IE in iberia should appear before celts too
You ignored the indo european presence in sri lanka during first half
Here's one for New Zealand, we're with you guys!
please make it about Turkic people and Ural people.
hitittes are indo european people in Anatoly
Corded ware spread much faster to north-western Europe around 2900 BC,not 2600 lol
There's a mistake in the Italian peninsula. The Etruscans were a well known culture that wasn't Indo-European and was located in North-Central Italy before and during the origins of Rome and you're showing an Indo-European migration there from the moment the italic people arrive to the peninsula. Etruria became Indo-European much later when it was invaded by Rome and adopted Latin.
Good video, but you missed the true origin, it was northern and North western India , the true abode and origin of The Vedic Aryans and not the steppes of Eurassia. Please correct the video and upload!. Remember Sanskrit is the oldest Indo European language and it has been truly exclusive to India! Shubham Bhawatu!
This is a very good work and so impressive! But... Where are the armenians and A
anatolians?
They are not genetically Indo-European
@@anthrosapien3784 But they're still Indo-Europeans, like turks and yakuts are very different in terms of genes, but both are the turkic nations.
@@user-xg9yg8kg7i What we call "Indo-European" is not a unity of race and origin. Indo-European; is a language family.
@@anthrosapien3784 Armenian are indo european and it was not iranian branch rather Anatolian branch.
Also there were Phrygians, Lydians and Hittites that is considered indo european languages. Celts settled in center Anatolia and were called Galatians and spoke Celtic Galatians from 3th century BC to 3th century AD.
Also greek had spread over all western Anatolia before 1000AD.
@@anthrosapien3784 There is no such thing like "genetically Indo-European". The Indo-European feature is a linguistic and cultural one. And even the branches you depicted are genetically distinct from each other, and full of non-stepparian ancestries too. I can't even imagine how Hittites could be less genetically stepparian compared to the overmixed and creolized Germanic peoples.
so how to interp this , the years they settled trough europe they took over and we europeans are all decendants of them ? where did the native people go who already lived in europe ?
Some peoples of Europe, descendants of ancient Europeans - Sardinians, Basques, Mediterranean and Balkan Europeans, Sami, partly Scandinavians, Caucasians
Yamnaya appeared around 3300 BC, not 3700 BC. also, the Andronova, Karasuk, Afanesyevo and Tagar cultures are not Indo-European either.
Tocharians are not Indo-European. The video is completely wrong
Thanks for the feedback
@@Enteldantel1i They are though
@@RafalRacegPolonusSum not CORE Indo european
Archaeology, genetics and linguistics have proven that these cultures separated from the Indo-European Yamnaya culture. And this has nothing to do with the Turks😉
Indo-Aryans were already in the Indian subcontinent by 1500CE, which is the official concensus of the date of the composition of rgveda. Their entry is shown too late. Same with the Iranian branch, they got a whole empire spanning the full extent of Iran and then some by 500BCE. And if you are including greek migrants, then you should have mitanni aryan subculture, the alans, the Kushans, who are considered to be of tocharian origin, and the IA migrants to Sri lanka and Indo-China.
the dark green art in spanish america is correct, now the same ir in brazil is incorrect, brazil is not hispanic but portuguese.
i think is a simplification , here in brazil we use the term pardo
@@turro3212This video doesn't just talk about racial groups, but about language, and the dark green color is marked on the graph as Hispanic, in Brazil we speak Portuguese and there are more descendants of Portuguese and Italians than Spanish. Finland and Hungary are racially European, but according to linguists they do not speak an Indo-European language which is why they are marked as white in this graph.
What about the Seljuk Turks and Genghis Khan?
turks are... well, turks, not IE. Mongols are Ural-Altaic, not IE
more accurate would be calling them just latins, not just italic because france romania and iberians werent italic...
you counted Moldovans as Slavs when they are Romanians :(
My mistake sorry lol
Why is Romania almost entirelly white? It should be green - romance language there.
I think that the white spot is Hungary.
Why isn’t Anatolian Indo-European??
Their dominant haplagroup is J2.
@@jacobjonm0511
This haplogroups (E,G,I,J and more) among the sea peoples and anatolian farmers, who switched to their language, they themselves R1b
sorry for my english, i'm not a native english speaker
I have heard that Proto Anatolian language branched off from Pre-Proto Indo-European(Proto Indo-Hittite). According to a statistic, Yamnaya like people(Western Steppe Herders) seemed to be hybrid race between Eastern European Hunter Gatherers(EHG) and Caucasian Hunter Getherers(CHG), but little genome from EHG was found from Ancient Anatolians remains, but that of CHG was found among them.
NO HITTITES!!!
*_You totally excluded indo euorpean anatolians like carians, lydians, lycians._*
Good effort but not entirely correct. Canada has a massive Scottish genetic footprint so should be more Celtic ditto Australia and New Zealand. Due to the highland clearances and Irish famines you find Scottish and Irish names over represented in white majority former colonies.
Aryan migration in Iran and India too fast
Yeah that's because he f*ed the dates. But it was still fast according to the historical timeline.
That's because of horses and collapse of native civilizations before that era. They just filled up the void.
How's Israel Indo-European they don't even speak an Indo-European language but a Semitic one
Jews were dispersed across Europe and often intermixed with local European so many Israelis are technically mixed though only a few dots are shown in Israel
lmao hispanics are aryan?
yes
но стоит уточнить что часть карлага степлага вятлага таки выжила совсем мизерная в азийском гетто
А где Хетты, Анатолийцы, Лидийцы, Ликийцы, Фракийцы, Армяне ????????????????????
There isn’t a ‘Hispanic’ group
mestizos/half blood they're half indoeuropeans and caucasics because of spanish conquistadores
Balts are shown way too far north. They never reached Estonia.
What color is israel
Israel isn't Indo-european they're Semetic
@danilapolesciuk4316 watch the video they got some indo european color on them
They worshiped a sky god with a hammer/axe just like the hittites.
I think he added Ashkenazi jews who speak Ashkenazi language which is a Germanic language under the indo-european family. They are linguistically indo-european but ethnically Semitic.
@user-io7sh7nx7c yeah most of them speak Hebrew and not Yiddish
Since when Macedonia is Greek ??? Since when Macedonians are Greeks ? In -330 bc, Macedonian Kingdom conquered all Greece. In the 6th century, all balkan and Greece was conquered by Slavs !!! You should mention it !!!!!!!
You talking about Thessaloniki or Skopje and when?
естестественно они туда прихватили и часть населения империй межморья
но радикально отличающемся от кадров тарак тамги совершенно иного происхождения от иных золотоордынцев и тем более могулисранцев
кроме того чмобик там территории тех фрицев совсем мизерные а что касается всяких посольств консульств торговых представительств охранных гарнизонов прочих а большая часть того там например у франции британии голандии бельгии
к слову америки то колонии португалии испании британии франции
а вот по мордору давно повазвращалась монголо китайщина комрада мао с компашкой и в прошлый век оно не было не было так как в средневековье в прошлом веке масштабы террора совсем иные причем сразу и за рейх и за китай
краснодарский ставропольский и т д и т п короче 9 краев 4 клина
кроме того так званые славяне южные западные восточные никогда не были и близко в таких границах даже когда тусили по невриде всякие там уличи торки вятичи дрогобычи радимычи кривичи ятвяги и т д и т п то было не славянами а балтами и не чистыми балтами а разбавленными пришлым нашествием европы которое вместе с теми балтами к тому времени уже века как ассимилированы булгарией как и большая часть европы
ну и кроме того все те халифаты а их дохера вокруг каспия от самого верха и далеко на юга кроме того делийский султанат туда же
правда есть ньюанс с краденных территорий дохерища утилизировано а кто не добит вывезен в гетто при этом там осталось дохера местных в гетто азии тоже самое касается прочих короче чуток севера чуток центральной азии чуток дальнего востока полесья слобожанщины донщины стародубщины кубани кавказа северного еще выжили
а скоро их и там не станет более 82 лет как оно сбежало
особенно учитывая куда уебывало население серого и зеленого клинов в прошлом веке от бойни ну там к ним еще 9 краев забайкальский амурский уссурийский с азиатами разделенные
кроме того чмобик фрицев в начале прошлого века в мордоре оставалось всего 2 области саратовская и волгоградская да и те свалили к шведам в ингерманляндию в унру и в мкад
а оно там обустроится только на окраинах золотоордынцев выкинув их в сторону от себя
также это пиздабольство не учитывает джунгарские монгольские ойраты которые бездарно убивались с дунганами о китай половиной а второй половиной о ногайскую орду и горцев о жузы казаха узбека кыргыза бездарно безрезультатно и весь 18 век до красной книги до жалкой калмыкии в остатках кроме того оно убивалось и о кызылбаш и о янычарню и о казакию которая естественно не стояли в стороне
This is very wrong ,wtf is this ?.?
не говоря уже о таком сброде поверх финоугорской андрофагии азийской как изгои сувары татары сибирские татары башкирские татары ебанутейшего наровчата исламодатели 10 века енисейские кыргызы уйгуры а это еще и близко не ак орда кок орда большая орда