I was originally a Nikon shooter. I shot with a Nikon d300 & d700 with a 24-70mm 2.8, 12-24mm 4.0 and a 105mm 2.8 macro. This combo was incredibly heavy after a while. I first picked up an em10 ii for casual shooting and fell in love with the system. Shortly thereafter I picked up the Em1 ii and parted ways with Nikon; I’ve never regretted it. I no longer own the Em1 ii but I recently picked up a used Em5 ii for only $290 and it’s a really nice camera. The 12-40 & 40-150mm 2.8 are unbeatable for size clarity and price. The 17 & 25mm 1.8 are incredibly lightweight and super sharp. Not too long ago I added to my kit a Fuji Xpro 2 with their tiny 16, 23, 35 & 50mm WR primes, primary for street photography. It’s a nice system but there is something really special about Olympus lenses so if I have to choose between the two, Olympus would win. If OMD produces a Pen f with a new sensor, I would sell all of the Fuji equipment in a heartbeat.
I have switched quite often over the last 40 years! Digitally I'm now sticking to m43 (Olympus Pen F digital and E-M10II, several lenses from Olympus and 2 zooms from Panasonic). At first it was the look and feel of the cameras, in the end it is features (pixel-shift high-res mode for digitizing negatives), size, weight and prize (I've looked around what could give me what I need and have, and m43 is cheaper for that). I still own a Sony A7, but it sits in a cardboard box and is rarely used for years by now. When it comes to analog cameras, it's a completely different picture … 😁
Yes, switched many times over… if you consider it was a solitary camera each time. I’ve owned Nikon, Canon, Kodak, Olympus, Sony, Fujifilm and Leica but now own three (four if you include the iPhone) brands now… Ricoh, Sony and Fujifilm.
In my 70’s and shot Canon products all my life, until about 8 years ago. Switched to Olympus and never looked back. A trip to Africa really convinced me when I was limited in weight and gear. Olympus came through with outstanding results. No one knew I wasn’t using my Canon gear and thought the pictures were outstanding.
I am still in camp full frame, but there’s definitely something to be said for walking around with the Olympus 100-400 compared to the full frame 150/200-600 zooms.
Well said. MFT is all we need. You hit it on the nail when you said the most important thing is to enjoy your photography and that is what Olympus cameras deliver in spades. Enjoy.
I switched from Canon to Lumix 2 years ago and couldn't be happier. I love the smaller lenses, Panasonic, Olympus, and Laowa. I love that I can carry all my lenses in one bag, and I love the stabilisation. MFT is a fabulous system.
I used to own Nikon SLR and DSLR cameras with really nice lenses. Always took it with me on trips and they were good companions. Then sold the entire system because they changed to mirror less but they never kept up with promises: “smaller lenses” yes some lenses became smaller, but at the cost of speed, sacrificing the improvements made on the sensors. I now own a OM-1 mkii with 12-40 f2.8 and my all time favorite 40-150 f2.8. I love this system, the performance and quality while yet so compact. I’d never think I could afford a 300 mm fast lens and here we go, even with zoom.
I switched to Oly M4/3 in 2015 on suggestion from a friend and never looked back. It’s inspiring to view your RUclips splash. I especially appreciate you not harping on pixel count, or sensors, and instead focusing on the art of photography. Again thanks...
Pixels and sensors have never really been a consideration of mine. As long as the camera does what I want then I’m happy. I’ve enjoyed the dabble with this system so far. So much so that I did in fact sell all of my Canon gear to go full time with the format!
I get the weight and bulk reduction bit. That's why I have shot and will continue to shoot Canon M. The 32MPx M6II with the 22/2 lens is a joy, a revelation even.
E-M1 Mark II is my favourite camera I have owned even against much more expensive full frame mirrorless cameras. I like it so much, I bought a second one solely to support my 60mm Macro and 12-40mm F2.8 (with battery grip attached) while my landscape one (with L bracket) is used with the 12-100mm F4 (which takes the stabilisation to the next level) and the Leica 8-18mm. Couldnt be happier. Nice work Chris :)
That’s great to hear John. I’m going to see how I get along with it when it comes, hopefully next week, and I had the same idea. Grab another one and use it for video. The EM5 Mark ii will work as a blog camera, but the EM1 Mark ii had some slightly sexier video features.
I did my big switch form Canon to Olympus in 2014. At the time I sold my Canon gear I was just fed up with it and had no real idea what I wanted to switch to so I bought a 2nd hand Canon G11 from a family member and spent just over 6 months with only that. I sold images from the G11 and had no problem working around it's quirks. It gave me the time and space to really work out what I needed from a camera and what I didn't need and I came out with a short list of must haves and the Olympus gear ticked all my boxes. I still have my Oly gear and I'm very happy with it. I have picked up a 2nd hand Canon G16 recently though to keep in my sketching kit for reference photos when I'm sketching. I still have a lot of fun with the little digicams. My daughter borrowed my G11 in 2017 to do a 365 project along side me and I never got it back lol.
That’s a great example of someone finding something that works for them. And that’s the whole point of my switch. While I’ve had people tell me I’ll regret it, it has its limitations etc, it’s a system that works for me and it’s flaws I can work around.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto The way I see it, all cameras have their limitations in one way or another. Not enough bokeh or not enough depth of field or too big, too small, no ibis , no viewfinder, or too simple a menu or too difficult lol. They're like camera bags, there just isn't one perfect bag for everything 😂I wish, although Hermione Granger's bag had possibilities 🤔
Love the light weight for travel. What really sold me was taking a night shot of a building internally lit hand held at 1/10 second at f5.6 and it came out clear as anything.
I've jumped ship from Nikon to Oly em1 mkiii 6 months ago. The initial attraction was reducing the weight, rarely needing a tripod and being waterproof. It has so much more though that I'm enjoying, in house filters, live composite, pro capture and more that I love which covers my range of nature photos. My lenses are pro 12-40, 40-150, 60 macro and 1.4 converter. Alot lighter bag than before. The only negative is the complicated menu system with my memory but I'm starting to make sense of it!
I’d agree with you on the menu system, it’s not the best. I’m going to pick up the 40-150 2.8 before the year is out. I need the remote shutter before I start playing with the live modes properly but they look quite good fun.
Thanks for sharing your journey. I was a Canon snob until a month ago, when the aperture ribbon on my EF 24-70 f2.8L died (and before then, the shutter on my Canon body was becoming increasingly unreliable). Replacing the body and lens with Canon RF equivalents was going to be AUD6000, which I couldn't justify given that it was so heavy (a 7kg camera bag) that my gear spent 99.9% of its life in the cupboard and came out only for family events. I looked into lighter and smaller gear and considered a Fujifilm X100S/T and Canon M series. Then I found an E-M10 Mk II + 14-42mm pancake lens collecting dust at a department store, offered AUD200 for them and got them! Later that week, when I was looking for a 40-150mm lens, I found a complete kit for sale (another E-M10 Mk II, a 14-42 pancake lens, a 40-150 and a camera bag, all basically new) for AUD450! This gear has completely transformed my photography. My camera bag is tiny and weighs 1.2kg with everything I need in it. I can (and do) take it everywhere. The E-M10 Mk II has controls and features I've never seen on a Canon body, particularly a low-end Canon camera (which Canon hobbles to make us spend more). I am enjoying photography for the first time in a decade. I go out at night and taking handheld street and architectural photography in black and white and I'm having a blast. (The last time I did that was 20 years ago with a Mamiya RB67 and a massive tripod, which was great fun except that I was dragging 16kg of gear around the city for hours). Is there higher quality equipment available? Of course there is. But they say that the best camera is the one you have on you. For most people that means a smartphone. For me, it now means an E-M10 Mk II. And the quality of the images is high enough that I'm considering selling fine art prints from my photos (noting that I might get an E-M5 in the future to get 20MP and some water/dust resistance). If I was to do wedding or event photography again I'd buy into the Canon RF system, as it's a better workhorse than Olympus M43. For the sheer joy of personal photography, however, I'm loving Olympus M43.
I recently retired from professional photography. For the last 10 years of that time I shot a ton of weddings and corporate events using m4/3's, and never had a problem -- clients were thrilled with the images. I agree with everything you said, except the the part about the Canon RF system being a 'better workhorse than Olympus M4/3". I now shoot with the Olympus E-M1X and the Olympus Pen-F -- they are both feature packed. The E-M1X is a true workhorse -- it's the finest camera I've ever owned including a number of Medium Format film cameras.
I completely understand. When I picked up my Olympus M1 for the first time, it was a magical moment. Caught completely by surprise, it felt like the camera was made specifically for my hand. It just felt perfect. Then I started to get familiar with the features and lenses and, I was done for. That was 9 years ago, and I haven’t looked back.
i totally agree when your dragging a backpack thats massive it does sap the fun out of it feels like im still in the army , plus so many features in the olympus , massive camera, awesome video again , i thank you once agasin
I shot with Nikon for 40+ years. Moved to lumix gx7, sone got me interested in Fujifilm so bought the Pro 2, but now in my 80’s I really wanted a lighter system. Also felt it had been a mistake to move to fujifilm over lumix. Just moved back to m 4/3 with purchase of OM 5, but still had my lens from before. What many of you don’t know is that back when shooting Nikon, we went from manual focus lens to auto focus lens, to cameras with built in light meters from hand held meters. So you changed out complete systems with in one manufacturer. I had to do that three times with Nikon.
Similar journey here.. I used Nikon film SLRs, switched to digital but stayed with Nikon, D70, D200 and D7100 but in 2016 I realised I had to significantly lighten the load. I used an Olympus OM-D E-M10 mk 1 for a few years and now have both an E-M1 mk ii and E-M10 mk iii. Absolutely no regrets 👍
I went the same route. The EM1 II with the 12-40 f 2.8 pro is the best combo I have ever shot with. Just bought a used 60 mm f 2.8 Olympus two weeks ago. Amazing little lens.
Great to hear you’re having luck with that combo as that’s the one I went for. Along with the 60MM macro. I should have some change left over to look for something else too.
Yep fully agree. Got an E-M10 mii for travel 5 years ago and sold Canon kit when I realised the performance, less wight and sheer enjoyment of a carry-everywhere camera. Fell in love with photography again now have the E-M10 mkii, E-M1 mkiii and a range of lenses. IBIS is amazing allowing 2s or less hand held at night, 14-42EZ standard zoom is so small on the E-M10 its fist inn my pocket.
This Channel is so much fun, informative and amazingly well edited ... please keep it up. RUclips needs more niche channels with their own heart. Greetings from a german Sony FF-Shooter and Olympus-lover :)
Welcome to m4/3. I think we all have similar stories. My last Canons were an 80D and 6D. I never considered an Olympus until I saw a display in a camera store while on vacation in Vienna Austria in 2019. I couldn't believe the size!!! I started looking at pics of M43 on Flickr and rented one for a week travelling in Utah. A month later I sold both Canon bodies, my 3 L lenses (17-40, 24-105, 70-200) and a Sigma 120-400, then bought the EM5II with a 12-40 mm and Lumix 35-100. I added the EM1mkii (used) only for the 2 card slots when I returned to Europe last Sept. I absolutely love the system. The "power to weight" ratio is unbelievable!!!
I have owned Canon, Nikon and Fuji... Then I got the Panasonic G9 and a whole lot of Olympus cameras. I traded all of them over the years and finally have an Olympus EM1 mkiii and I just got the OM1. I am having so much fun now and my gear doesn't weigh me down.
I chose Olympus as my first new interchangeable lens digital camera for the weathersealing, I’m staying for everything else they have to offer. Great camera system!
Recently got a 2nd hand E-M1 MkII. It's DELIGHTFUL. (Had the 4/3 lenses for years) Only thing is it'll take you about 2 weeks to get used to the monster menu and set it up (button assignation etc) exactly how you want it. IMHO the greatest bargain in 2nd hand photographic equipment there is, especially if you look at the 'sold' prices for GX8, GX9 etc.
I was a Canon user for 10 plus years, wildlife was my favorite activity, but with the camera the150-600 Sigma and a couple of other lenses it was just to much to carry. Started with the Olympus EM-1 mk 2 with the 100-400 Panasonic plus the Olympus 12-100 and never looked back. Weight was nearly 50% less and it the image quality was not much worse than the Canon equipment. Chris made a very important point in that unless you are using photography as a living, image quality is good as you need. Also not having to carry a tripod due to Olympus IBIS is another bonus. I have now moved on to the OM systems OM1 and it really is a joy to use. As a backup I have the Olympus 5 mk iii with the 12-200 lens.
I use an EM-1 II with a Lumix 20mm f.17 and an Oly 45mm F1.8 to shoot bands and musicians in pubs and clubs (with a Lumix GX-7 as a backup), as its size and weight make it ideal for the environment. Every review of M43 makes a point of saying it doesn't work well for low-light/high-ISO stuff, yet I get results that work perfectly and keep getting me requests to come and shoot. Good enough that it's about to make up 50% of the images in an exhibition I'm holding (and the other 50% were all shot on film 30 years ago).
I think when it comes to low light people just don’t like noise. Digital camera sensors produce noise regardless of size. I’ve always preferred noise of blur - it’s a matter of taste I think. I’ve shot at night with the 45 1.8 and found nothing that worries me at all.
People who say m4/3 "isn't good for low light or high ISO" is just parroting someone else. They've never actually shot it for themselves. I've taken plenty of low light, high ISO shots with my m4/3 gear and the results up to ISO 3200 are amazingly good. Run those files through Topaz Denoise AI or DxO PureRAW and you would not be able to distinguish them from FF images.
I have used Nikon, Canon, Pentax and some others right from way back in the 35mm film days. I recently got an Olympus OM-D E-M1 mark 1 16mp camera. I am blown away. I have never had a camera that is so way ahead of it's time and so easy to use. In body stabilization, complete control and the ability to see what your exposures will look like before tripping the shutter. Even the cheaper Olympus lenses are incredible. I have the 40-150 f4.5 - f5.6 and the pancake 14-42 and I am stunned with the quality of the images. Add that to the light weight of it all. I am selling all of my Nikon, Canon and everything in-between. To think I used to avoid the M4/3 sensor cameras as I thought they were not up to a pro standard. Someone please kick me in the balls for taking so long to realise just how good the Olympus M4/3 system really is. For me it leaves my old Nikon and Canon cameras in the dust.
You hit the nail on the head in this video Chris. I used to shoot Nikon and it served a purpose (take images) but I didn't really enjoy it. I switched to Fuji and that's when I started enjoying my photography again. I did still use a Nikon for wildlife but since buying the amazing Fuji 150-600mm lens I sold my Nikon D500 and 200-500mm lens and now shoot 100% Fuji No regrets. It's whatever makes you happy
I have had a Konica and Sigma SLR camera and a Canon DSLR then got fed of the Canon and used Lumix bridge cameras. A friend recommended that I should get an APS-C camera and he used an old Sony NEX. After looking at the reviews, I bought a Fujifilm X-E3 with the 18-55mm lens and some months later bought the Samyang 12mm. I didn't really appreciate what I had but started using it for regular photography and was surprised with how good it was. In the autumn I bought the Fujifilm 70-300mm lens and the 1.4X teleconverter and it is stunning combination. It is used when photographing wildlife in the gardens of a castle. It is a mile away and I walk there and back without noticing the weight of the camera. The camera with the 70-300mm lens and 1.4X teleconverter gives a light and portable system with a full frame effective focal length of 630mm. A full frame equivalent would be horrendous. Carrying the SLRs and DSLR around was chore, but the Fujifilm system is enjoyable to use. I will probably upgrade the camera in the summer and will get another Fujifilm, maybe the X-S20.
@@catherinegrimes2308 the Fuji 70-300mm is indeed a fantastic lens with excellent IS and so light. It's great that you can use the 1.4x If you ever want greater reach I'd highly recommend the amazing (albeit expensive) 150-600mm it is so sharp ☺
@@tuftyhill Many thanks for the advice Paul. When I was selecting the lens, the shop had a new 70-300mm and a used 100-400mm and the prices were similar. The 100-400mm was a better lens but was concerned about the weight and size. On lifting the 100-400mm it didn't seem to be that bad, but when it was on my camera, I knew that it would be too heavy to comfortably carry it around for a significant amount of time so I chose the 70-300mm. The 70-300mm was bought in the autumn and apart from a holiday in Gran Canaria, I haven't used it in strong sunlight and will be getting used to it in the summer. Then I can think about getting a larger lens. But I am 66 and have to be practical, so I don't think that I could manage the 150-600mm lens unless I have it mounted on a gimble. Going to a camera with a 40MP sensor gives a greater opportunity to crop the images and this could be the most practical way ahead. Thank you for your advice, if I do decide to go for the 150-600mm I will let you know.
I shot with Canon from 2007 till 2015 and my main reason for jumping ship to Olympus OMD and Panasonic Micro four thirds was the savings in weight both bodies and lenses. I couldn't get over how good the OMD's with small yet sharp lenses were and I can honestly say I don't have a single ounce of regret making the change. Change can be scary thing but if you have found something that makes you get out there more and especially enjoy photography more. Then it's time to call it and move forward for the best!
Thanks that’s exactly where I found myself. I found something that just works for me. The gear is compact and lightweight and the prices are a lot more friendly than the Canon gear. Hopefully my next video will be using my new toys!
Same with me. Used Canon and Nikon with APS C Sensors and Film before that for years. About three years ago I bought an EM 10 Mk 3 and was blown away. Now I mainly use an EM 5 Mk 3 and a Lumix G9. When I travel a Sony RX 10 IV usually joins me along with an EPL 9. The nee mirrorless systems from Nikon and Canon are certainly attractive, but none of the lenses I have can be used and along with the hefty pricetag I have decided on MFT.
Funny, I’m thinking I’ll revert back to Canon for similar reasons, enjoyment! I dabbled in Olympus and Sony, but just realised how much I prefer canon in so many ways, and you can adapt your old L glass which often goes quite cheaply now. You can adapt to Sony but sometimes lose af, usually on my favourite lenses. I might keep one Olympus body and the 12-100 for walking around / travel though, it’s very versatile.
I recently got rid of all my Canon gear as well. I have the EM5 mk2 and that's the camera I would pick up every single time, I love it! I have it paired with the HLD 8 camera grip for most of my shooting but having the option to throw on the 14-42 EZ lens and take the grip off makes it pocketable if you have decent sized pockets. I've been considering picking up the EM1 mk3 specifically for the Starry AF.
I am strictly a hobbyist doing photography for the fun and creativity, and as much as I enjoy the sound and feel of my Pentax K-2000, the weight of the Sigma lenses gets heavy around the neck after a long hike. I love my GX85 so much more. Light weight, the lenses are compact and light. I am getting some pretty good image results from the M43 sensor.
I’ve seen nothing from the MFT camera I’ve used that puts me off in terms of image quality. Where I post my stuff it’s just not an issue, it’s all about finding what works for yourself isn’t it!
Take a hard look at the 12-45 f/4 vs the 12-40 f/2.8. For landscape work, it's much lighter, sharper, a bit more reach, closer focusing, and cheaper. I have them both. I tend to use the 2.8 when indoors or where weight doesn't matter. Anytime I'm out hiking doing landscapes, it's the f4 every time.
Good advice. If I could afford to get the f2.8 zoom, it'd probably only ever come off for my 60mm macro now and then. Using the Lumix 20mm and the Ol 45mm for highest quality and the f4 zoom for grab-and-shoot occasions, for now.
A week ago I traded my Nikon gear for Olympus em1 mk 2. Absolutely no regrets. The design and handling make all the difference and this makes me want to get out and use the camera.
Thanks Michael. It’s good to know other folks have done something similar. My EM-5 MKii has given me similar feelings with enjoying getting out shooting again.
I have used Canon forever also. I recently picked up an EM1 Mark iii and have fallen in love. It's absolutely brilliant and suits my landscape needs. I still have my 6d for Astro purposes but this Olympus kit satisfies everything else, travel, landscape, hiking, long exposure you name it.
@G B my Canon currently has a busted SD slot so used the Olympus for recent Aurora. Really good sharp images. However my Canon is asto modded so it is superb for Orion, Milky Way and nebulae
Been using Canon for paid work for around 15 years but last year I got myself a Fuji x100v for travel and loved it so much I actually sold all my canon gear and have moved to Fuji full time. Half the size and weight and honestly so close in image quality
Hi Chris, I switched from my Canon 5D Mark IV with assorted L glass as well as some non L primses such as the 85mm F1.8 and the 40mm F2.8 to Olympus last summer. I first tested the waters with the original Em1.1 and was quite impressed with it. I decided to purchase an Em1.3 for the 50 megapixel HHHR feature as well as pro-capture. I have no regrets what-so-ever. I was able to get some great pro and premium glass for the Olympus and still have money left over, thanks to the many great deals for used gear online. In actuality, one of my favourite lenses is an M. Zuiko 40-150mm F4-5.6R which I got for $60 USD which is about $80 Canadian. The ergonomics of the camera are fantastic and the image quality works for me beyond my expectations, the feel in the hand is outstanding. Actually I get fewer missed shots with the new kit.
I have that same 40-150 and actually I was really impressed with it on my EM-5 Mark ii. I think it was about £90 over here. Still a hell of a lot cheaper than the Canon 70-200 I have. I think I’m at the point where I’m hanging onto the Canon gear because it’s Canon, when really I should have been looking at what works for me and I’m glad I’ve finally found something with the Olympus cameras.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto I actually do have one regret. I elected to sell the Olympus EM1.1. My regret is that I didn’t keep it as a backup camera. Despite its age it was a great performing camera and the 16 megapixel files were excellent.
Loving this channel. I inherited an Olympus recently, found a good few channels with general photography tips but this here is so close to where i need to learn! Also really enjoyed the productions of the video - got a proper country file vibe to it and I mean that as a massive compliment!
Starting in 1970 I went from Canon FD (FTb/F1/F1n) to 4/3 in 2003 (Olympus E300/E620/E5) to 6x7 in 2013 (RB67) to m4/3 recently (OM-5/E-M10 mkIV). The medium format kit got to be a bit much for this mid-70s guy. So far, I've been pretty impressed with the little kit.
I have not switched too often, but have had 5 different brands and lens for the last decade all at once from Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and Fujifilm...this year sold everything and jumped deep into OM Systems...and I won't look back. I feel they are the most advanced camera's money can buy. Fantastic pro lens collection too and so light and small !
Hi Chris, I have several Olympus MFT camera bodies. The EM1 mkii is by far the heaviest of them but the ergonomics outweigh that. It feels so right in the hand. If you do go ahead with purchasing it and pair it with the 12-40 pro lens you will not be disappointed and I can’t wait to see the images you produce
Thanks Alan. I went for everything I said in the video so the EM1 Mark ii and the 12-40MM 2.8 Pro will become my go to combination. I grabbed the 60MM 2.8 macro too and I should have some change left over to look for something on the wide end too. Oh and filter step up rings. And batteries. And remotes. Why’s it so expensive this hobby 🤦🏻♂️
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto it’s scary how much I’ve spent on MFT gear since Covid lockdown…..blame everything on Covid!. I have just about settled on which gear to keep ( which suits me best) . So I’m gradually thinning out my collection….the 12-40, 14-150, 75-300 and 60 macro will be my keepers. I’m looking forward to more of your vids.
Enjoy your ride, Chris. E-M5II user here and still contemplating the E-M1 M3, but it’s just a travel/family hobby for me. I cannot stress how much the 12-45 Pro would suit your setup. It’s even been tested to be just a tiny bit sharper than the 12-40. Also the PL9mm 1.7 is so good no wonder it’s always out of stock.
The wide end is somewhere I’ve struggled to find a lens at a reasonable price and I have a feeling the 16-35mm is the only lens I’ll miss. Any suggestions on something comparable?
You can often find the Panasonic Leica 8-18mm f2.8-4 second around $500-$600 USD. It’s a lovely lens and can easily take circular filters. The Olympus 9-18mm will be the cheapest wide-zoom. Laowa makes some very nice, wide primes. Manual focus only but also very affordable.
Made up I saw this video. Ive got a canon 7D and Im 69 this year and finding it hard to keep steady and like you don't want to be using the tripod all the time. Looks like you've given me a way out, cheers Chris. Regards Ed
The 7D was a little on the bulky side for me at times too. I’ve found the little Olympus cameras to be a breath of fresh air. Their size and weight combines with the amazing IBIS has been an eye opener for me.
From Nikon FF to MFT! I have now Olympus E-M10 markII, E-M1 markII and Panasonic GX80 and G9! Olympus prime lens, kit lens, two PRO lens and Panasonic zoom lens for Dual IS! Never been happier!
Sorry to ask this question out of the blue, but it seems like you have the experience I'm looking for. I have a single camera, a GX80, and a 75-200mm lens. I want to be able to get better image quality for wildlife shots, in less than brightly-lit situations. Should I upgrade my lens to something with a longer reach or better light gathering, or would you recommend switching to a G9 or another brand entirely?
It seems like you may benefit from one or both. The super telephoto lenses used for wildlife tend to fall into two brackets. Reasonably priced on the used market for a variable aperture, usually f4.5-5.6 which aren’t the fastest, or f2.8s which will destroy your bank account. The only advice I could give you would be to look at one of the old Canon 1D series bodies and their 100-400mm lenses. You’re looking a minimum of around £700 for that setup. Or for the same price you could pick up the Olympus 40-150 Pro which is a 2.8 lens all the way through the range.
@@i_of_thundera Depends. I've been amazed by the IBIS in the E-M1 mk2 compared to what I got from my Canon (lens stab only) or my GX-80 Panasonic (with lenses featuring dual IS). But you still need a tripod for long exposures or high res mode (there's no handheld hi-res on the mk2) or when using ND grads.
I was into photography in my early years with film, picked it up again 16 years ago with a canon and didn't really like it so the phase passed, moving on to 2 years ago and got a pen f and my love of photography was reignited, regrettably i sold it to buy my retirement present, the OM1 which i love, its great though above my needs as an amateur, ive seen posts on photography face book pages asking advice on which camera to buy as a beginner and nobody recommends Olympus, except me
The problem with Facebook groups is most folks just push their own camera because to them, it’s the bees knees. The reality is the best camera for anyone is the one they’re comfortable using. You say your OM1 is above your needs but really what you should be thinking is how you can get more from it. Experiment, push your boundaries and try new things with it.
@Chris Baitson ah yes but i alsobhave an E1 which i equally love, the OM1 does what i want and more than i need but it scratched an itch and it'sscratched it,, both can stand ibad weather which is the reason i traded in the pen f, the pen f however will be replaced at sometime when funds allow
Switched from Nikon to Olympus this year with no regrets. The portability and pro lens quality is fantastic. 50mp handheld is great for walkabout landscapes.
I started with Canon M1, M3, M6, switched to Olympus M10mkII and M5….now I’m loving my LUMIX GX85 & GX9….best I’ve ever had, and menu is better on LUMIX than Olympus….love micro 4/3, also love my LX10 and ZS200 (amazing little cameras)…..
Just watched your video I did the same a year and a half ago I moved from canon to Olympus mft and I have never looked back enjoy your journey the em1 mkii is an excellent bit of kit
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto. Thanks for the video on the Olympus cameras it’s making me want to take mine off the shelf, I have the em1 mk II as well and several lenses. I have been thinking of selling the lot but I have more lenses for this kit than any other camera I have. I do like the Olympus colours I used to have the 5 MK ii but didn’t enjoy using the small size camera it gave me some good memories.
I've switched so. many times I've lost count. Back in film days I switched from Fuji(M42 screw mount) to Olympus OM. Then when I went digital I started with Panasonic Lumix then switched to Olympus(when the EM5 came out). I also played with Sony A7 FF for about 18 months but went back to Olympus. A camera is a tool. It's a light-tight box with some mechanism for capturing light(film or sensor). Stick a good lens on the front and the rest is down to the photographer. My current cameras are Olympus EM1ii for landscape, macro and studio, Lumix GX80 rangefinder style for street work and travel, a vintage Yashica D TLR for medium format film(and mostly just some nostalgic fun!) The latter has no meter, manual everything, even down to cocking the shutter prior to firing it!
I have an OM-1 Digital. Super images…well they’re very clear at least and I’m never aware of them being in any way inferior to larger sensor-sized Nikons or Canons. Build quality is superb and the fact that I can turn the rear screen to face the inside of the camera body means greatly reduced risks of scratching or abrasions. The ergonomic of the Olympus range have always been very good. I don’t use cables to download images. I just pop out the SD card and insert in in the back of my iMac. Easy.
Hi Chris, yes my canons are gathering dust R6, 5D mkIII, 90D since i rediscovered my m43 cameras Panasonic GH5M2, EM10 mkII & the EM1 mkIII im loving micro four thirds.
It’s a case of finding something that just works for yourself and doing everything you need I think. I’m holding onto a lot of it purely because it’s Canon at this point.
I love the M43 system. I have an EM1 Mark III with Pro lenes. I sell my work on line and at galleries and have never had a buyer say "oh, I'm not buying your work because it wasn't shot with a FF camera".
I used Canons from the AE1 through the 80D. I knew them. I loved them. They paid a lot of rent, kids tuition and just food on my behalf. My last two Canon 80Ds travelled with me to Budapest, Bratislava, Barcelona, the Check Republic, Romania, Zagreb and many points in-between. . As I aged, they became too heavy to carry with 3lb lenses over a 5 to 8 Km treck through frequently cobble alleys and up multiple flight of medieval stairways. I just bought a good used G9. It weighs about 1/4 to 1/3 of the Canon rigs with equivalent lenses. I'm 76 for god's sake.. My only complaint is that they are, by my standards, "overproduced." I am not certain if I am using a camera or a micro miniaturized mainframe computer. Still. The more I use it, the more forgiving is seems to be. I may use 1/10th of it's automated capability but it is giving nice images under any condition that I have encountered so far. 3 months in and in Budapest right now
I've got a different (sort of) problem. I've only been shooting at all seriously for about 3 years and the only system I've used is Olympus. Started with an EM10 MkIII and then moved up to the EM 1 Mk II. And I've got a decent range of lenses. I'm really happy with the system and the quality of the pictures I get. The issue is, I can't help wondering what the other systems offer. I'm pretty sure I won't switch, but there is that niggle at the back of my mind. So, you're lucky to be "coming across" from a position of knowledge and experience!
If you are competent with what you have, you will get good results with different cameras. But they are unlikely to be better, or worse. I am particular about the lenses I use, I strongly favour some specialist Canon lenses. Those lenses do make the final photos better (to my eye) and more easily. For those, I use a Lumix S1R. Keith Cooper has a video on why, for him, the 5Ds is the best camera. Again, it's driven by lens choice.
The only way you’ll find out is to try other systems. If you’re happy with what you have then there is probably no real need to switch. Just don’t fall into the trap of thinking a new camera or system will improve things drastically. I made that mistake years ago.
It's actually amazing how far tech has come. My gh5 is already amazing. I never had anything else, went from the gh4 to the gh5. The only 3 things someone can miss from FF is how easy it is to get shallow dof, easier to get wide angle lenses, and better low light. How do you enjoy it after 1 year?
I have 5D MKII, an EM5 MKII, EM1 MKII, and D800 and D7200. Now I agree with you that for me atleast the EM1 MKII and EM5 MKII get used more than all the others put together, mainly to the weight, portability and the superb IBIS. But the full frames do have a slight advantage , well D800 has a huge advantage particularly in dynamic range, in terms of resolution and lower noise, but for landscape photography I really do rate the EM1 and EM5 MKII very highly. The EM5 MKII is also very suitable for what is called ' street photography ' as it is very discreet. The 12~40 F2.8 Pro is a stunning lens and I don't think that despite all the hype neither Olympus nad now the OM- System ( what a bloody stupid name for a camera company ) have managed to better it in all these years.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto I like to make photographs in unfavourable conditions. With the EM cameras, I have to use HDR at times, with the D800 I have never used HDR. Usually the scenes that I shoot, either with film or digital have a range of about 8 stops of luminance. With film I am more comfortable to exceed 8 stops as I can control the density range with special developers such as Pyro or soft working ones like A49 or D23.
I switched from Nikon and Sony to MFT and could not be happier! I keep the old cameras but I almost never use them anymore. In my opinion MFT is the future!
My first camera was Canon and second Canon, but I switched to Micro 4/3 system with EM5 mark I camera since 4 years ago. And to this day I really love the Micro 4/3 system. I really enjoyed watching the photos in your video. Big LIKE. Greeting from Singapore.👍🔔
I own and use a range of Lumix and Olympus mft covering many years from the E-PL7 to the G9. I have never found any of them them lacking in any department whether image quality, focusing, noise, or low light. The big gun pro mft are work horses, I prefer to carry the smaller ones.
I love my M43 gear and my most used lens is the 14-140. On the GX9 its a very compact setup with a lot of range. Add lenses like the 60mm macro, 25mm 1.7 and the 100-300 and you can get very good results with very little weight or cost. Saying all this i am thinking about going Canon because there are 4 or 5 lenses that i would use a lot and full frame does have benefits. But i'd never sell my m43 gear. I think its fine to have 2 or 3 different cameras.
I shot with Nikon APSC for about 5 years and switched to Canon and don't regret it at all. One of the main reasons is that my passion is bird-in-flight photography and the Canon R6 was a game changer when it came out and Nikon didn't have anything comparable. The focus system and animal eye focus is great. Also, the Nikon video in my opinion was not very good at all and I had actually bought a Canon M-50 just to make RUclips videos. Now with the Canon R6 I can take stills and good video with the same camera. Also, I have the Olympus EM-5 mark ii and love it for street photography but don't see myself ever getting rid of the Canon gear, I'll keep them both.
Nikon AF until the mirrorless systems was notoriously bad. Canon got it right early on with the dual pixel auto focus. If I was a wildlife shooter I’d have probably gone down the route you’ve taken in all honesty but for what I do, autofocus performance is a none issue in reality.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto yes, I had a Nikon D7500 DSLR and the video capability was not good like you say. I have not tried the Nikon mirrorless. Yes, for what you do, the Olympus system is very good. I have heard good things about the OM-1 for wildlife but am too "sold on" and also invested in Canon that I am not interested in switching. Good luck!
Another enjoyable video Chris. You are completely on the money when you said that the camera is a tool and if your choice of format or brand meets your needs then go for it. I enjoy using multiple types of camera gear, MFT amongst them, but I will occasionally pick up an old 3.2 mp Nikon 995. Why? Because I enjoy photography and the challenge of getting the best out of whatever camera I happen to have with me.
I just think the time has come to move on and away from some kind of sentimentality I feel towards Canon. There are better options out there for me and it’s time to explore them.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto Very true Chris, there are a lot of useful features on MFT cameras. Mirrorless is definitely the future. I suppose am guilty of sentimentality about just one camera, my 1st 35mm, a Zorki 4K that I got new in 1973! and still use.
I moved from the Canon 7D mk2 with Sigma 70-200 f2.8 that I used for football photography to the Olympus EM-1 Mk2 with Olympus 40-150 f2.8 and never regretted it
I shoot with a 7D and am seriously thinking of a jump to Olympus. The 7d is long in the tooth and I can't believe it's still going strong. Would like lighter equipment too. Good to hear of your positive experience.
Canon to Olympus7 years ago and I am very happy. look at the Panasonic 12-60mm f2.8-4. Weather sealed very clean photos and you know 24-120 view on canon. Great all around lens for pretty much everything.
See, you've got the point. Canon is jewellery and Olympus is a fantastic tool. I turned off all the noises and the camera is so discreet that nobody knows I'm shooting. You're going to have a lot of fun with that kit.
Thanks John. It’s not somewhere I ever thought I’d find myself with regards to Canon. I’ve pulled the trigger with MPB and ordered all of the kit I mentioned at the end of the video 😁
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto you'll not be disappointed. I started my journey with micro four thirds in 2016 with the underated, but extremely capable gem in the form of the Lumix GX80, then acquired a G1 and a GH1 and a G5. In 2019 I went for the EM1ii, and have never regretted it, it's a camera that was well ahead of its time, and still stands up very well today, it's my go to over my Canon 5D and 6D. Coupled with Pro Glass it provides superb image quality. I use the 12-40mm f2.8, 40-150mm f2.8, 25mm f1.2, 30mm Macro and 17mm f1.8. Olympus glass is superb quality.
I don't know about that, Olympus is like a toy camera. It's so tiny and has to design things to fit in a smaller form factor. I do get that some people prefer the smallness, but for larger men it's a massive problem. I've got a 5d with a similar lens to the one that he was using and it's not that hard to deal with. A smaller camera would be too light to reliably hold.
I have been a photography enthusiast since childhood and I have been shooting with Canon for around 15 years . Over that time I have built up an extensive collection of lenses and DSLR bodies. I shoot a wide range of genres , these days mostly wildlife , landscape and travel . I'm not getting any younger(late 50s) and my fitness level is beginning to decline . I find that my once loved Canon gear is just too bulky and heavy these days , and technology has moved on , particularly in terms of focus tracking . I had considered moving to Canon mirrorless, but their policy on third party lenses killed off that idea . I considered m43 but couldn't live with its inherent compromises . Long story short , I'm in the process of transitioning to Sony .
I looked at Sony a couple of years ago. My bank account didn’t like Sony. I’ve owned a couple of Canon mirrorless cameras and given how late they got to the party, they could have done better.
@Chris Baitson It was the same when I started to think about it a couple of years ago . These days used , low milage a7iii or even a7r3s are available in my price range .
Looking at doing exactly the same. Recently bought a used E-M10 ii and 25mm f1.8 and absolutely love it. Just getting back into digital now retired (mainly use analogue,) I've found I don't look forward to trudging round with my 7D, three lenses, filters, tripod etc etc. No fun at all. So decided to trade in my 70-200 f2.8L ii and 100 f2.8L macro for an E-M1 mkii and 12-40 f2.8. Only hesitating as MPB don't specify shutter count on their bodies..
MPB do show shutter counts for some, but not all, it’s frustrating. I tend to avoid anything on the cheaper end of their scale and look for the more expensive good/excellent rated gear in the hopes that the shutter count reflects in the price. It’s a good point you raise about them though.
switched from nikon in 2013 to olympus the nikon was staying in the boot of the car more and more have two em1 mk11 s one with 12-40 f2.8 one with a 60mm macro or 40-150 f2.8 depends what I am doing flower or motersport for example pro lenses are so sharp . as is the amazing 85mm f1.8 all I pick up used .i think you are spot on .
I’m proud of you mate. It takes courage to change your system, and you did it. May I be so bold to suggest that you upgrade to the 12-45 f4 pro and the 40-150 f4 pro. I’m so happy with mine and they are still small and light mated with my E-M5 mk2. I’ve never been happier. Keep up with your amazing work.
Great video! I switched from Canon too a long time ago to Panasonic Micro Four Thirds cameras, and never really looked back! With Micro 4/3 the cameras and lenses are actually smaller, and as you said, the image quality is actually good.
Chris all my gears Canon. Just got a em10 mk 2 just as a starter to give it a go on this 4/3rds system .if it catches on might fully move over .As you say you haven't got to carry a enormous backpack of gear around .and at my age I find it a bit of a weight .crack on mate
It was the EM-10 Mark ii that kick started all of this for me. Having used that I realised there were things about the Canon cameras that I just don’t care about, and the Olympus did things that made my life easier. It’s all a compromise but it’s one that works for me!
I've lost count how many times I've changed systems because I wanted to try something different :) I would say if you can afford a little more try and get the mark III. It's a baby e-mx. Has handheld high rest mode, built in ND filters and starry af sky modes. The built in ND filters and hand held high res mode alone make the upgrade worth it imo. Good luck with the change.
I looked at the Mkiii and while I can afford I’d, the money is better spent on glass at this point I think. Live ND and the hand held hi res modes do sound fun though.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto I have the Panasonic G9 which is an amazing M43 camera but doesn't have the phase detect of the Olympus. I don't shoot a lot of video and the single point to point focusing on the panasonic is the quickest I've ever used on any camera system. I'll look forward to watching your videos when you get the em1 mk II :)
You’re probably not losing anything in DR, plus the Olympus EM1 Mk II is a great sports/wildlife camera if you ever want to give that a go. I’ve a GH5 which is a far better stills camera than it gets credit for but the EM1 series cameras are tempting. As for switching systems I’m a bit of a gear hoarder I have 7 mounts/systems, what I can tell you is sensor size/brands don’t nearly matter as much as some people make out they do. Enjoy the videos keep up the good work
While not saying goodbye to Canon I did ditch my RP and will probably will never go to their RF line full frame or crop. I absolutely LOVE the EF-M cameras, having the EOS M (w/ Magic Lantern), M50 and M200, for their incredible portability and flexibility with a near limitless combination of adaptable vintage lenses. That said my other rig is a Panasonic G85 which I love as well there’s just something about MFT that just works.
Switched from Sony FF and APSC to LUMIX MFT. The compactness of MFT lenses (weight and size) the lower cost of both body and lenses, the excellent IBIS and finally the menu and intuitive touch screen is what pulled me over. The only thing still better on the Sony is the AF but on LUMIX it’s not as bad as a lot of reviewers make it appear. Especially with the latest lenses AF is good.
The 12-40/2.8 is a superb lens …perhaps slightly too big on my E-M5. Like you I’m considering moving up to the E-M1, it’s a perfect match for this lens. I’m keeping my 5D mk1 though, I just couldn’t bring myself to part company with it.
I’m holding onto a lot of it purely because it’s Canon. I wanted the 5D3 for so long and when I finally got one it just wasn’t what I wanted it to be and I feel I’ve finally found something that works for me!
I’m so happy to change my canon equipment for my Olympus is the best I have no regrets just satisfactions, I have the ‘em-1 mark 1 and I feel that I don’t need more. I like the photography no video, I can’t wait for buy more lenses and enjoy the photography.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto It's great for hiking. get the version II. I used it for some head shots two days ago. I was surprised on how good the results were . Typically I would have used the 40 to 150 2.8
I bought an Olympus OM 10 Mark ii as a second camera to my Nikon. Because it was to be my second camera I didn't invest in many lenses but you are inspiring me to move to Olympus fully as I love the camera. I am taking note of the lenses you recommend. My only gripe is the OM share app, which is not good and can be so frustrating it stops me taking my camera out as the photos won't transfer easily to my phone. If I could find a better way to transfer my images I'd love to use my Olympus as my main camera.
M43 form factor is great I think but it needs a new sensor. For bird photography it is the lightest setup with interchangeable lenses and often a tripod is not required because of its excellent IBIS. However, if you crop frequently or pixel peep, you should compare it carefully with the heavier and bigger APS-C combo. The form factor gap is no longer as big as it once was.
Before you spring for the 12-40, hope you take a good look at the 12-45 f4. If you don't need 2.8 that's a kickass little lens. Smaller, lighter, weather sealed, and just as sharp.
I love cameras, but for me, they are tools (sometimes toys). I have long said that most cameras can create professional-level images in the right hands. I usually use my Canon 5D IV and III when I do professional work. Why? Because I have the lenses needed, and I love their robust design and control surfaces. However, when I'm out and about, I use a smaller camera, most frequently a Canon M6 Mark II. I once shot an entire professional job (it ran for several months) using a very consumer-level Micro 4 3 camera (I don't remember the model, but it was already several years old when I used it). The job involved documenting a complete home renovation, and I needed something very small and agile. The images were great, but the camera failed (actually, the lens failed) when someone knocked it down (around 2 feet). That is why I like robust cameras for pro work. However, I always prefer a smaller camera for hiking, street photography, and even landscapes. It is a drag to carry around a giant camera and a big lens (or lenses). Plus, I can bring a lightweight travel tripod with ease. Such a tripod would never support my 5D IV. Oh, here is another dirty little secret. My 5D IV has an automatic HDR feature that I often use when doing architectural interiors. It produces good results but also gives me the original bracketed images. I can use the in-camera image ninety percent of the time, but I can always convert the bracketed images if needed. Yes, that means I often shoot in JPEG. Guess what? It works, and my customers are happy. The bottom line is to do and use what works for you, not what some influencer tells you you should do.
@@JezdziecBezNicka should this trade with MPB be as the quote says I’ll have some change left over. I’m going to have a look at one of those now. Thanks for the input.
I've been shooting the e-m1 mark ii for the past year and use it as a hybrid. It does great video and photo. I don't think olympus gets enough credit for its auto focus. The only weakness i've found with the Olympus vs my full-frame cameras is the dynamic range.
I’ve not tried the EM1 for video just yet but the codec looks spot on. I used to record on my Canon RP at 60mbps so essentially I can quadruple the bit rate, I like the sound of that.
Are you trading in all the Canon gear? Ultimate IQ is still with the 35mm image sensor. I use a E-M1 mk3 as my main camera and truly love it, no hesitation taking with me when I head out. For me that is biggest take away for using a smaller system.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Have you ever switched camera system? If so, what made you decide it was time for a change?
I was originally a Nikon shooter. I shot with a Nikon d300 & d700 with a 24-70mm 2.8, 12-24mm 4.0 and a 105mm 2.8 macro. This combo was incredibly heavy after a while. I first picked up an em10 ii for casual shooting and fell in love with the system. Shortly thereafter I picked up the Em1 ii and parted ways with Nikon; I’ve never regretted it. I no longer own the Em1 ii but I recently picked up a used Em5 ii for only $290 and it’s a really nice camera. The 12-40 & 40-150mm 2.8 are unbeatable for size clarity and price. The 17 & 25mm 1.8 are incredibly lightweight and super sharp. Not too long ago I added to my kit a Fuji Xpro 2 with their tiny 16, 23, 35 & 50mm WR primes, primary for street photography. It’s a nice system but there is something really special about Olympus lenses so if I have to choose between the two, Olympus would win. If OMD produces a Pen f with a new sensor, I would sell all of the Fuji equipment in a heartbeat.
No regrets moving from Canon?
went from Canon to Lumix, never going back
I have switched quite often over the last 40 years! Digitally I'm now sticking to m43 (Olympus Pen F digital and E-M10II, several lenses from Olympus and 2 zooms from Panasonic). At first it was the look and feel of the cameras, in the end it is features (pixel-shift high-res mode for digitizing negatives), size, weight and prize (I've looked around what could give me what I need and have, and m43 is cheaper for that). I still own a Sony A7, but it sits in a cardboard box and is rarely used for years by now. When it comes to analog cameras, it's a completely different picture … 😁
Yes, switched many times over… if you consider it was a solitary camera each time.
I’ve owned Nikon, Canon, Kodak, Olympus, Sony, Fujifilm and Leica but now own three (four if you include the iPhone) brands now… Ricoh, Sony and Fujifilm.
In my 70’s and shot Canon products all my life, until about 8 years ago. Switched to Olympus and never looked back. A trip to Africa really convinced me when I was limited in weight and gear. Olympus came through with outstanding results. No one knew I wasn’t using my Canon gear and thought the pictures were outstanding.
I am definitely not missing switching from Canon. The gear is just so much easier to carry around with me now!
I am still in camp full frame, but there’s definitely something to be said for walking around with the Olympus 100-400 compared to the full frame 150/200-600 zooms.
Well said. MFT is all we need. You hit it on the nail when you said the most important thing is to enjoy your photography and that is what Olympus cameras deliver in spades. Enjoy.
I switched from Canon to Lumix 2 years ago and couldn't be happier. I love the smaller lenses, Panasonic, Olympus, and Laowa. I love that I can carry all my lenses in one bag, and I love the stabilisation. MFT is a fabulous system.
I used to own Nikon SLR and DSLR cameras with really nice lenses. Always took it with me on trips and they were good companions. Then sold the entire system because they changed to mirror less but they never kept up with promises: “smaller lenses” yes some lenses became smaller, but at the cost of speed, sacrificing the improvements made on the sensors. I now own a OM-1 mkii with 12-40 f2.8 and my all time favorite 40-150 f2.8. I love this system, the performance and quality while yet so compact. I’d never think I could afford a 300 mm fast lens and here we go, even with zoom.
I switched to Oly M4/3 in 2015 on suggestion from a friend and never looked back. It’s inspiring to view your RUclips splash. I especially appreciate you not harping on pixel count, or sensors, and instead focusing on the art of photography. Again thanks...
Pixels and sensors have never really been a consideration of mine. As long as the camera does what I want then I’m happy. I’ve enjoyed the dabble with this system so far. So much so that I did in fact sell all of my Canon gear to go full time with the format!
I get the weight and bulk reduction bit. That's why I have shot and will continue to shoot Canon M. The 32MPx M6II with the 22/2 lens is a joy, a revelation even.
E-M1 Mark II is my favourite camera I have owned even against much more expensive full frame mirrorless cameras. I like it so much, I bought a second one solely to support my 60mm Macro and 12-40mm F2.8 (with battery grip attached) while my landscape one (with L bracket) is used with the 12-100mm F4 (which takes the stabilisation to the next level) and the Leica 8-18mm. Couldnt be happier. Nice work Chris :)
That’s great to hear John. I’m going to see how I get along with it when it comes, hopefully next week, and I had the same idea. Grab another one and use it for video. The EM5 Mark ii will work as a blog camera, but the EM1 Mark ii had some slightly sexier video features.
I did my big switch form Canon to Olympus in 2014. At the time I sold my Canon gear I was just fed up with it and had no real idea what I wanted to switch to so I bought a 2nd hand Canon G11 from a family member and spent just over 6 months with only that. I sold images from the G11 and had no problem working around it's quirks. It gave me the time and space to really work out what I needed from a camera and what I didn't need and I came out with a short list of must haves and the Olympus gear ticked all my boxes. I still have my Oly gear and I'm very happy with it. I have picked up a 2nd hand Canon G16 recently though to keep in my sketching kit for reference photos when I'm sketching. I still have a lot of fun with the little digicams. My daughter borrowed my G11 in 2017 to do a 365 project along side me and I never got it back lol.
That’s a great example of someone finding something that works for them. And that’s the whole point of my switch. While I’ve had people tell me I’ll regret it, it has its limitations etc, it’s a system that works for me and it’s flaws I can work around.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto The way I see it, all cameras have their limitations in one way or another. Not enough bokeh or not enough depth of field or too big, too small, no ibis , no viewfinder, or too simple a menu or too difficult lol. They're like camera bags, there just isn't one perfect bag for everything 😂I wish, although Hermione Granger's bag had possibilities 🤔
Love the light weight for travel. What really sold me was taking a night shot of a building internally lit hand held at 1/10 second at f5.6 and it came out clear as anything.
I've jumped ship from Nikon to Oly em1 mkiii 6 months ago. The initial attraction was reducing the weight, rarely needing a tripod and being waterproof. It has so much more though that I'm enjoying, in house filters, live composite, pro capture and more that I love which covers my range of nature photos. My lenses are pro 12-40, 40-150, 60 macro and 1.4 converter. Alot lighter bag than before. The only negative is the complicated menu system with my memory but I'm starting to make sense of it!
I’d agree with you on the menu system, it’s not the best. I’m going to pick up the 40-150 2.8 before the year is out. I need the remote shutter before I start playing with the live modes properly but they look quite good fun.
Thanks for sharing your journey. I was a Canon snob until a month ago, when the aperture ribbon on my EF 24-70 f2.8L died (and before then, the shutter on my Canon body was becoming increasingly unreliable). Replacing the body and lens with Canon RF equivalents was going to be AUD6000, which I couldn't justify given that it was so heavy (a 7kg camera bag) that my gear spent 99.9% of its life in the cupboard and came out only for family events.
I looked into lighter and smaller gear and considered a Fujifilm X100S/T and Canon M series.
Then I found an E-M10 Mk II + 14-42mm pancake lens collecting dust at a department store, offered AUD200 for them and got them! Later that week, when I was looking for a 40-150mm lens, I found a complete kit for sale (another E-M10 Mk II, a 14-42 pancake lens, a 40-150 and a camera bag, all basically new) for AUD450!
This gear has completely transformed my photography. My camera bag is tiny and weighs 1.2kg with everything I need in it. I can (and do) take it everywhere.
The E-M10 Mk II has controls and features I've never seen on a Canon body, particularly a low-end Canon camera (which Canon hobbles to make us spend more).
I am enjoying photography for the first time in a decade. I go out at night and taking handheld street and architectural photography in black and white and I'm having a blast. (The last time I did that was 20 years ago with a Mamiya RB67 and a massive tripod, which was great fun except that I was dragging 16kg of gear around the city for hours).
Is there higher quality equipment available? Of course there is. But they say that the best camera is the one you have on you. For most people that means a smartphone. For me, it now means an E-M10 Mk II. And the quality of the images is high enough that I'm considering selling fine art prints from my photos (noting that I might get an E-M5 in the future to get 20MP and some water/dust resistance).
If I was to do wedding or event photography again I'd buy into the Canon RF system, as it's a better workhorse than Olympus M43. For the sheer joy of personal photography, however, I'm loving Olympus M43.
I recently retired from professional photography. For the last 10 years of that time I shot a ton of weddings and corporate events using m4/3's, and never had a problem -- clients were thrilled with the images. I agree with everything you said, except the the part about the Canon RF system being a 'better workhorse than Olympus M4/3". I now shoot with the Olympus E-M1X and the Olympus Pen-F -- they are both feature packed. The E-M1X is a true workhorse -- it's the finest camera I've ever owned including a number of Medium Format film cameras.
I completely understand. When I picked up my Olympus M1 for the first time, it was a magical moment. Caught completely by surprise, it felt like the camera was made specifically for my hand. It just felt perfect. Then I started to get familiar with the features and lenses and, I was done for. That was 9 years ago, and I haven’t looked back.
i totally agree when your dragging a backpack thats massive it does sap the fun out of it feels like im still in the army , plus so many features in the olympus , massive camera, awesome video again , i thank you once agasin
I shot with Nikon for 40+ years. Moved to lumix gx7, sone got me interested in Fujifilm so bought the Pro 2, but now in my 80’s I really wanted a lighter system. Also felt it had been a mistake to move to fujifilm over lumix. Just moved back to m 4/3 with purchase of OM 5, but still had my lens from before. What many of you don’t know is that back when shooting Nikon, we went from manual focus lens to auto focus lens, to cameras with built in light meters from hand held meters. So you changed out complete systems with in one manufacturer. I had to do that three times with Nikon.
Similar journey here.. I used Nikon film SLRs, switched to digital but stayed with Nikon, D70, D200 and D7100 but in 2016 I realised I had to significantly lighten the load. I used an Olympus OM-D E-M10 mk 1 for a few years and now have both an E-M1 mk ii and E-M10 mk iii. Absolutely no regrets 👍
I went the same route. The EM1 II with the 12-40 f 2.8 pro is the best combo I have ever shot with.
Just bought a used 60 mm f 2.8 Olympus two weeks ago. Amazing little lens.
Great to hear you’re having luck with that combo as that’s the one I went for. Along with the 60MM macro. I should have some change left over to look for something else too.
Yep fully agree. Got an E-M10 mii for travel 5 years ago and sold Canon kit when I realised the performance, less wight and sheer enjoyment of a carry-everywhere camera. Fell in love with photography again now have the E-M10 mkii, E-M1 mkiii and a range of lenses. IBIS is amazing allowing 2s or less hand held at night, 14-42EZ standard zoom is so small on the E-M10 its fist inn my pocket.
This Channel is so much fun, informative and amazingly well edited ... please keep it up. RUclips needs more niche channels with their own heart. Greetings from a german Sony FF-Shooter and Olympus-lover :)
Thanks Niklas I appreciate that mate.
Welcome to m4/3. I think we all have similar stories. My last Canons were an 80D and 6D. I never considered an Olympus until I saw a display in a camera store while on vacation in Vienna Austria in 2019. I couldn't believe the size!!! I started looking at pics of M43 on Flickr and rented one for a week travelling in Utah. A month later I sold both Canon bodies, my 3 L lenses (17-40, 24-105, 70-200) and a Sigma 120-400, then bought the EM5II with a 12-40 mm and Lumix 35-100. I added the EM1mkii (used) only for the 2 card slots when I returned to Europe last Sept. I absolutely love the system. The "power to weight" ratio is unbelievable!!!
I have owned Canon, Nikon and Fuji... Then I got the Panasonic G9 and a whole lot of Olympus cameras. I traded all of them over the years and finally have an Olympus EM1 mkiii and I just got the OM1. I am having so much fun now and my gear doesn't weigh me down.
I chose Olympus as my first new interchangeable lens digital camera for the weathersealing, I’m staying for everything else they have to offer. Great camera system!
Agree with you! I’ve been sold on it myself.
Recently got a 2nd hand E-M1 MkII. It's DELIGHTFUL. (Had the 4/3 lenses for years) Only thing is it'll take you about 2 weeks to get used to the monster menu and set it up (button assignation etc) exactly how you want it. IMHO the greatest bargain in 2nd hand photographic equipment there is, especially if you look at the 'sold' prices for GX8, GX9 etc.
I was a Canon user for 10 plus years, wildlife was my favorite activity, but with the camera the150-600 Sigma and a couple of other lenses it was just to much to carry. Started with the Olympus EM-1 mk 2 with the 100-400 Panasonic plus the Olympus 12-100 and never looked back. Weight was nearly 50% less and it the image quality was not much worse than the Canon equipment. Chris made a very important point in that unless you are using photography as a living, image quality is good as you need. Also not having to carry a tripod due to Olympus IBIS is another bonus. I have now moved on to the OM systems OM1 and it really is a joy to use. As a backup I have the Olympus 5 mk iii with the 12-200 lens.
I use an EM-1 II with a Lumix 20mm f.17 and an Oly 45mm F1.8 to shoot bands and musicians in pubs and clubs (with a Lumix GX-7 as a backup), as its size and weight make it ideal for the environment. Every review of M43 makes a point of saying it doesn't work well for low-light/high-ISO stuff, yet I get results that work perfectly and keep getting me requests to come and shoot. Good enough that it's about to make up 50% of the images in an exhibition I'm holding (and the other 50% were all shot on film 30 years ago).
I think when it comes to low light people just don’t like noise. Digital camera sensors produce noise regardless of size. I’ve always preferred noise of blur - it’s a matter of taste I think. I’ve shot at night with the 45 1.8 and found nothing that worries me at all.
People who say m4/3 "isn't good for low light or high ISO" is just parroting someone else. They've never actually shot it for themselves. I've taken plenty of low light, high ISO shots with my m4/3 gear and the results up to ISO 3200 are amazingly good. Run those files through Topaz Denoise AI or DxO PureRAW and you would not be able to distinguish them from FF images.
I have used Nikon, Canon, Pentax and some others right from way back in the 35mm film days. I recently got an Olympus OM-D E-M1 mark 1 16mp camera. I am blown away. I have never had a camera that is so way ahead of it's time and so easy to use. In body stabilization, complete control and the ability to see what your exposures will look like before tripping the shutter.
Even the cheaper Olympus lenses are incredible. I have the 40-150 f4.5 - f5.6 and the pancake 14-42 and I am stunned with the quality of the images. Add that to the light weight of it all. I am selling all of my Nikon, Canon and everything in-between. To think I used to avoid the M4/3 sensor cameras as I thought they were not up to a pro standard.
Someone please kick me in the balls for taking so long to realise just how good the Olympus M4/3 system really is. For me it leaves my old Nikon and Canon cameras in the dust.
Thanks!
Thank you Jacques!
You hit the nail on the head in this video Chris. I used to shoot Nikon and it served a purpose (take images) but I didn't really enjoy it. I switched to Fuji and that's when I started enjoying my photography again. I did still use a Nikon for wildlife but since buying the amazing Fuji 150-600mm lens I sold my Nikon D500 and 200-500mm lens and now shoot 100% Fuji No regrets. It's whatever makes you happy
That’s exactly it Paul. It’s about finding the thing that works for you! I’m
I have had a Konica and Sigma SLR camera and a Canon DSLR then got fed of the Canon and used Lumix bridge cameras. A friend recommended that I should get an APS-C camera and he used an old Sony NEX. After looking at the reviews, I bought a Fujifilm X-E3 with the 18-55mm lens and some months later bought the Samyang 12mm.
I didn't really appreciate what I had but started using it for regular photography and was surprised with how good it was. In the autumn I bought the Fujifilm 70-300mm lens and the 1.4X teleconverter and it is stunning combination. It is used when photographing wildlife in the gardens of a castle. It is a mile away and I walk there and back without noticing the weight of the camera. The camera with the 70-300mm lens and 1.4X teleconverter gives a light and portable system with a full frame effective focal length of 630mm. A full frame equivalent would be horrendous.
Carrying the SLRs and DSLR around was chore, but the Fujifilm system is enjoyable to use.
I will probably upgrade the camera in the summer and will get another Fujifilm, maybe the X-S20.
@@catherinegrimes2308 the Fuji 70-300mm is indeed a fantastic lens with excellent IS and so light. It's great that you can use the 1.4x If you ever want greater reach I'd highly recommend the amazing (albeit expensive) 150-600mm it is so sharp ☺
@@tuftyhill Many thanks for the advice Paul. When I was selecting the lens, the shop had a new 70-300mm and a used 100-400mm and the prices were similar. The 100-400mm was a better lens but was concerned about the weight and size. On lifting the 100-400mm it didn't seem to be that bad, but when it was on my camera, I knew that it would be too heavy to comfortably carry it around for a significant amount of time so I chose the 70-300mm.
The 70-300mm was bought in the autumn and apart from a holiday in Gran Canaria, I haven't used it in strong sunlight and will be getting used to it in the summer. Then I can think about getting a larger lens. But I am 66 and have to be practical, so I don't think that I could manage the 150-600mm lens unless I have it mounted on a gimble. Going to a camera with a 40MP sensor gives a greater opportunity to crop the images and this could be the most practical way ahead.
Thank you for your advice, if I do decide to go for the 150-600mm I will let you know.
I shot with Canon from 2007 till 2015 and my main reason for jumping ship to Olympus OMD and Panasonic Micro four thirds was the savings in weight both bodies and lenses. I couldn't get over how good the OMD's with small yet sharp lenses were and I can honestly say I don't have a single ounce of regret making the change. Change can be scary thing but if you have found something that makes you get out there more and especially enjoy photography more. Then it's time to call it and move forward for the best!
Thanks that’s exactly where I found myself. I found something that just works for me. The gear is compact and lightweight and the prices are a lot more friendly than the Canon gear. Hopefully my next video will be using my new toys!
Same with me. Used Canon and Nikon with APS C Sensors and Film before that for years. About three years ago I bought an EM 10 Mk 3 and was blown away. Now I mainly use an EM 5 Mk 3 and a Lumix G9. When I travel a Sony RX 10 IV usually joins me along with an EPL 9.
The nee mirrorless systems from Nikon and Canon are certainly attractive, but none of the lenses I have can be used and along with the hefty pricetag I have decided on MFT.
Funny, I’m thinking I’ll revert back to Canon for similar reasons, enjoyment! I dabbled in Olympus and Sony, but just realised how much I prefer canon in so many ways, and you can adapt your old L glass which often goes quite cheaply now. You can adapt to Sony but sometimes lose af, usually on my favourite lenses. I might keep one Olympus body and the 12-100 for walking around / travel though, it’s very versatile.
I recently got rid of all my Canon gear as well. I have the EM5 mk2 and that's the camera I would pick up every single time, I love it! I have it paired with the HLD 8 camera grip for most of my shooting but having the option to throw on the 14-42 EZ lens and take the grip off makes it pocketable if you have decent sized pockets. I've been considering picking up the EM1 mk3 specifically for the Starry AF.
I am strictly a hobbyist doing photography for the fun and creativity, and as much as I enjoy the sound and feel of my Pentax K-2000, the weight of the Sigma lenses gets heavy around the neck after a long hike. I love my GX85 so much more. Light weight, the lenses are compact and light. I am getting some pretty good image results from the M43 sensor.
I’ve seen nothing from the MFT camera I’ve used that puts me off in terms of image quality. Where I post my stuff it’s just not an issue, it’s all about finding what works for yourself isn’t it!
Take a hard look at the 12-45 f/4 vs the 12-40 f/2.8. For landscape work, it's much lighter, sharper, a bit more reach, closer focusing, and cheaper. I have them both. I tend to use the 2.8 when indoors or where weight doesn't matter. Anytime I'm out hiking doing landscapes, it's the f4 every time.
Good advice. If I could afford to get the f2.8 zoom, it'd probably only ever come off for my 60mm macro now and then. Using the Lumix 20mm and the Ol 45mm for highest quality and the f4 zoom for grab-and-shoot occasions, for now.
A week ago I traded my Nikon gear for Olympus em1 mk 2. Absolutely no regrets. The design and handling make all the difference and this makes me want to get out and use the camera.
Thanks Michael. It’s good to know other folks have done something similar. My EM-5 MKii has given me similar feelings with enjoying getting out shooting again.
I did the same two years ago.
I have used Canon forever also. I recently picked up an EM1 Mark iii and have fallen in love. It's absolutely brilliant and suits my landscape needs. I still have my 6d for Astro purposes but this Olympus kit satisfies everything else, travel, landscape, hiking, long exposure you name it.
Try "Starry Sky AF" and a good, sharp lens on the E-M1 III. You'll never use the Canon again for astro.
@G B my Canon currently has a busted SD slot so used the Olympus for recent Aurora. Really good sharp images. However my Canon is asto modded so it is superb for Orion, Milky Way and nebulae
Been using Canon for paid work for around 15 years but last year I got myself a Fuji x100v for travel and loved it so much I actually sold all my canon gear and have moved to Fuji full time. Half the size and weight and honestly so close in image quality
Totally agree! It’s nice to find something new that just works.
Hi Chris, I switched from my Canon 5D Mark IV with assorted L glass as well as some non L primses such as the 85mm F1.8 and the 40mm F2.8 to Olympus last summer. I first tested the waters with the original Em1.1 and was quite impressed with it. I decided to purchase an Em1.3 for the 50 megapixel HHHR feature as well as pro-capture. I have no regrets what-so-ever. I was able to get some great pro and premium glass for the Olympus and still have money left over, thanks to the many great deals for used gear online. In actuality, one of my favourite lenses is an M. Zuiko 40-150mm F4-5.6R which I got for $60 USD which is about $80 Canadian. The ergonomics of the camera are fantastic and the image quality works for me beyond my expectations, the feel in the hand is outstanding. Actually I get fewer missed shots with the new kit.
I have that same 40-150 and actually I was really impressed with it on my EM-5 Mark ii. I think it was about £90 over here. Still a hell of a lot cheaper than the Canon 70-200 I have. I think I’m at the point where I’m hanging onto the Canon gear because it’s Canon, when really I should have been looking at what works for me and I’m glad I’ve finally found something with the Olympus cameras.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto I actually do have one regret. I elected to sell the Olympus EM1.1. My regret is that I didn’t keep it as a backup camera. Despite its age it was a great performing camera and the 16 megapixel files were excellent.
Loving this channel. I inherited an Olympus recently, found a good few channels with general photography tips but this here is so close to where i need to learn! Also really enjoyed the productions of the video - got a proper country file vibe to it and I mean that as a massive compliment!
Starting in 1970 I went from Canon FD (FTb/F1/F1n) to 4/3 in 2003 (Olympus E300/E620/E5) to 6x7 in 2013 (RB67) to m4/3 recently (OM-5/E-M10 mkIV). The medium format kit got to be a bit much for this mid-70s guy. So far, I've been pretty impressed with the little kit.
I have not switched too often, but have had 5 different brands and lens for the last decade all at once from Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and Fujifilm...this year sold everything and jumped deep into OM Systems...and I won't look back. I feel they are the most advanced camera's money can buy. Fantastic pro lens collection too and so light and small !
Hi Chris, I have several Olympus MFT camera bodies. The EM1 mkii is by far the heaviest of them but the ergonomics outweigh that. It feels so right in the hand. If you do go ahead with purchasing it and pair it with the 12-40 pro lens you will not be disappointed and I can’t wait to see the images you produce
Thanks Alan. I went for everything I said in the video so the EM1 Mark ii and the 12-40MM 2.8 Pro will become my go to combination. I grabbed the 60MM 2.8 macro too and I should have some change left over to look for something on the wide end too. Oh and filter step up rings. And batteries. And remotes. Why’s it so expensive this hobby 🤦🏻♂️
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto Chris, if you have a Canon RS-60 wired remote, it will work with the E-M1 mk2, so that might save you a few quid.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto it’s scary how much I’ve spent on MFT gear since Covid lockdown…..blame everything on Covid!. I have just about settled on which gear to keep ( which suits me best) . So I’m gradually thinning out my collection….the 12-40, 14-150, 75-300 and 60 macro will be my keepers. I’m looking forward to more of your vids.
@@alangamble3236 thanks Alan. I’m hoping I can pick something wider up too but I’m not sure which way to go with that one just yet.
Enjoy your ride, Chris.
E-M5II user here and still contemplating the E-M1 M3, but it’s just a travel/family hobby for me.
I cannot stress how much the 12-45 Pro would suit your setup. It’s even been tested to be just a tiny bit sharper than the 12-40.
Also the PL9mm 1.7 is so good no wonder it’s always out of stock.
The wide end is somewhere I’ve struggled to find a lens at a reasonable price and I have a feeling the 16-35mm is the only lens I’ll miss. Any suggestions on something comparable?
Just get the PL 9mm 1.7.
Used it on a Vienna trip late summer and it was simply amazing, even night shots were great.
@@adeyalbader1483 I’ll see if I can find one. Cheers.
You can often find the Panasonic Leica 8-18mm f2.8-4 second around $500-$600 USD. It’s a lovely lens and can easily take circular filters. The Olympus 9-18mm will be the cheapest wide-zoom. Laowa makes some very nice, wide primes. Manual focus only but also very affordable.
Thanks for the input Tony. It’s something I really need a proper look into is something at the wide end!
Made up I saw this video. Ive got a canon 7D and Im 69 this year and finding it hard to keep steady and like you don't want to be using the tripod all the time.
Looks like you've given me a way out, cheers Chris.
Regards Ed
The 7D was a little on the bulky side for me at times too. I’ve found the little Olympus cameras to be a breath of fresh air. Their size and weight combines with the amazing IBIS has been an eye opener for me.
From Nikon FF to MFT! I have now Olympus E-M10 markII, E-M1 markII and Panasonic GX80 and G9! Olympus prime lens, kit lens, two PRO lens and Panasonic zoom lens for Dual IS! Never been happier!
That’s a question I keep meaning to ask. Do the Panasonic lenses work with the Olympus bodies for the dual IS?
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto No it won't, but the IBIS in the Olympus will still function as well as with Panasonic lenses as it does with Olympus lenses.
@@ianparr1533 Thanks for clearing that up Ian!
Sorry to ask this question out of the blue, but it seems like you have the experience I'm looking for. I have a single camera, a GX80, and a 75-200mm lens. I want to be able to get better image quality for wildlife shots, in less than brightly-lit situations. Should I upgrade my lens to something with a longer reach or better light gathering, or would you recommend switching to a G9 or another brand entirely?
It seems like you may benefit from one or both. The super telephoto lenses used for wildlife tend to fall into two brackets. Reasonably priced on the used market for a variable aperture, usually f4.5-5.6 which aren’t the fastest, or f2.8s which will destroy your bank account.
The only advice I could give you would be to look at one of the old Canon 1D series bodies and their 100-400mm lenses. You’re looking a minimum of around £700 for that setup.
Or for the same price you could pick up the Olympus 40-150 Pro which is a 2.8 lens all the way through the range.
Excited to see more of what you do with this system!
Thanks man. Just hope it’s the right call in the long run.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto do you think the IBIS is good enough to not use a tripod for your landscape still work?
@@i_of_thundera Depends. I've been amazed by the IBIS in the E-M1 mk2 compared to what I got from my Canon (lens stab only) or my GX-80 Panasonic (with lenses featuring dual IS). But you still need a tripod for long exposures or high res mode (there's no handheld hi-res on the mk2) or when using ND grads.
I was into photography in my early years with film, picked it up again 16 years ago with a canon and didn't really like it so the phase passed, moving on to 2 years ago and got a pen f and my love of photography was reignited, regrettably i sold it to buy my retirement present, the OM1 which i love, its great though above my needs as an amateur, ive seen posts on photography face book pages asking advice on which camera to buy as a beginner and nobody recommends Olympus, except me
The problem with Facebook groups is most folks just push their own camera because to them, it’s the bees knees. The reality is the best camera for anyone is the one they’re comfortable using. You say your OM1 is above your needs but really what you should be thinking is how you can get more from it. Experiment, push your boundaries and try new things with it.
@Chris Baitson ah yes but i alsobhave an E1 which i equally love, the OM1 does what i want and more than i need but it scratched an itch and it'sscratched it,, both can stand ibad weather which is the reason i traded in the pen f, the pen f however will be replaced at sometime when funds allow
Switched from Nikon to Olympus this year with no regrets. The portability and pro lens quality is fantastic. 50mp handheld is great for walkabout landscapes.
I started with Canon M1, M3, M6, switched to Olympus M10mkII and M5….now I’m loving my LUMIX GX85 & GX9….best I’ve ever had, and menu is better on LUMIX than Olympus….love micro 4/3, also love my LX10 and ZS200 (amazing little cameras)…..
Just watched your video I did the same a year and a half ago I moved from canon to Olympus mft and I have never looked back enjoy your journey the em1 mkii is an excellent bit of kit
It’s great to hear others have done the same and feel like it was the right call. Helps with the confidence here.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto. Thanks for the video on the Olympus cameras it’s making me want to take mine off the shelf, I have the em1 mk II as well and several lenses. I have been thinking of selling the lot but I have more lenses for this kit than any other camera I have. I do like the Olympus colours I used to have the 5 MK ii but didn’t enjoy using the small size camera it gave me some good memories.
I've switched so. many times I've lost count. Back in film days I switched from Fuji(M42 screw mount) to Olympus OM. Then when I went digital I started with Panasonic Lumix then switched to Olympus(when the EM5 came out). I also played with Sony A7 FF for about 18 months but went back to Olympus. A camera is a tool. It's a light-tight box with some mechanism for capturing light(film or sensor). Stick a good lens on the front and the rest is down to the photographer. My current cameras are Olympus EM1ii for landscape, macro and studio, Lumix GX80 rangefinder style for street work and travel, a vintage Yashica D TLR for medium format film(and mostly just some nostalgic fun!) The latter has no meter, manual everything, even down to cocking the shutter prior to firing it!
I have an OM-1 Digital. Super images…well they’re very clear at least and I’m never aware of them being in any way inferior to larger sensor-sized Nikons or Canons. Build quality is superb and the fact that I can turn the rear screen to face the inside of the camera body means greatly reduced risks of scratching or abrasions. The ergonomic of the Olympus range have always been very good. I don’t use cables to download images. I just pop out the SD card and insert in in the back of my iMac. Easy.
Hi Chris, yes my canons are gathering dust R6, 5D mkIII, 90D since i rediscovered my m43 cameras Panasonic GH5M2, EM10 mkII & the EM1 mkIII im loving micro four thirds.
It’s a case of finding something that just works for yourself and doing everything you need I think. I’m holding onto a lot of it purely because it’s Canon at this point.
Olympus camera packed with features and a tool that’s packed with fun. Good choice 👍
Thanks Neil. Fingers crossed it’s the right call!
I love the M43 system. I have an EM1 Mark III with Pro lenes. I sell my work on line and at galleries and have never had a buyer say "oh, I'm not buying your work because it wasn't shot with a FF camera".
awesome
I used Canons from the AE1 through the 80D. I knew them. I loved them. They paid a lot of rent, kids tuition and just food on my behalf. My last two Canon 80Ds travelled with me to Budapest, Bratislava, Barcelona, the Check Republic, Romania, Zagreb and many points in-between. . As I aged, they became too heavy to carry with 3lb lenses over a 5 to 8 Km treck through frequently cobble alleys and up multiple flight of medieval stairways. I just bought a good used G9. It weighs about 1/4 to 1/3 of the Canon rigs with equivalent lenses. I'm 76 for god's sake.. My only complaint is that they are, by my standards, "overproduced." I am not certain if I am using a camera or a micro miniaturized mainframe computer.
Still. The more I use it, the more forgiving is seems to be. I may use 1/10th of it's automated capability but it is giving nice images under any condition that I have encountered so far. 3 months in and in Budapest right now
I've got a different (sort of) problem. I've only been shooting at all seriously for about 3 years and the only system I've used is Olympus. Started with an EM10 MkIII and then moved up to the EM 1 Mk II. And I've got a decent range of lenses. I'm really happy with the system and the quality of the pictures I get. The issue is, I can't help wondering what the other systems offer. I'm pretty sure I won't switch, but there is that niggle at the back of my mind. So, you're lucky to be "coming across" from a position of knowledge and experience!
I feel the same but I’ve only been shooting for a year.
Don't do it. You could spend thousands and your photos will still look the same.
Appreciate the advice.
If you are competent with what you have, you will get good results with different cameras. But they are unlikely to be better, or worse.
I am particular about the lenses I use, I strongly favour some specialist Canon lenses. Those lenses do make the final photos better (to my eye) and more easily. For those, I use a Lumix S1R. Keith Cooper has a video on why, for him, the 5Ds is the best camera. Again, it's driven by lens choice.
The only way you’ll find out is to try other systems. If you’re happy with what you have then there is probably no real need to switch. Just don’t fall into the trap of thinking a new camera or system will improve things drastically. I made that mistake years ago.
It's actually amazing how far tech has come. My gh5 is already amazing. I never had anything else, went from the gh4 to the gh5.
The only 3 things someone can miss from FF is how easy it is to get shallow dof, easier to get wide angle lenses, and better low light.
How do you enjoy it after 1 year?
I have 5D MKII, an EM5 MKII, EM1 MKII, and D800 and D7200. Now I agree with you that for me atleast the EM1 MKII and EM5 MKII get used more than all the others put together, mainly to the weight, portability and the superb IBIS. But the full frames do have a slight advantage , well D800 has a huge advantage particularly in dynamic range, in terms of resolution and lower noise, but for landscape photography I really do rate the EM1 and EM5 MKII very highly. The EM5 MKII is also very suitable for what is called ' street photography ' as it is very discreet. The 12~40 F2.8 Pro is a stunning lens and I don't think that despite all the hype neither Olympus nad now the OM- System ( what a bloody stupid name for a camera company ) have managed to better it in all these years.
How many stops of DR do you make use of on your D800 out of curiosity?
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto I like to make photographs in unfavourable conditions. With the EM cameras, I have to use HDR at times, with the D800 I have never used HDR. Usually the scenes that I shoot, either with film or digital have a range of about 8 stops of luminance. With film I am more comfortable to exceed 8 stops as I can control the density range with special developers such as Pyro or soft working ones like A49 or D23.
I switched from Nikon and Sony to MFT and could not be happier! I keep the old cameras but I almost never use them anymore. In my opinion MFT is the future!
That’s the same thoughts as I share. I needed to reduce the camera gear I had. I have no complaints so far.
My first camera was Canon and second Canon, but I switched to Micro 4/3 system with EM5 mark I camera since 4 years ago. And to this day I really love the Micro 4/3 system. I really enjoyed watching the photos in your video. Big LIKE. Greeting from Singapore.👍🔔
Thanks man I appreciate it 🙌🏻🤘🏻
I own and use a range of Lumix and Olympus mft covering many years from the E-PL7 to the G9. I have never found any of them them lacking in any department whether image quality, focusing, noise, or low light. The big gun pro mft are work horses, I prefer to carry the smaller ones.
Thank you for the advice and your posting
No problem. Hope you found it helpful!
I love my M43 gear and my most used lens is the 14-140. On the GX9 its a very compact setup with a lot of range.
Add lenses like the 60mm macro, 25mm 1.7 and the 100-300 and you can get very good results with very little weight or cost.
Saying all this i am thinking about going Canon because there are 4 or 5 lenses that i would use a lot and full frame does have benefits.
But i'd never sell my m43 gear. I think its fine to have 2 or 3 different cameras.
I shot with Nikon APSC for about 5 years and switched to Canon and don't regret it at all. One of the main reasons is that my passion is bird-in-flight photography and the Canon R6 was a game changer when it came out and Nikon didn't have anything comparable. The focus system and animal eye focus is great. Also, the Nikon video in my opinion was not very good at all and I had actually bought a Canon M-50 just to make RUclips videos. Now with the Canon R6 I can take stills and good video with the same camera. Also, I have the Olympus EM-5 mark ii and love it for street photography but don't see myself ever getting rid of the Canon gear, I'll keep them both.
Nikon AF until the mirrorless systems was notoriously bad. Canon got it right early on with the dual pixel auto focus. If I was a wildlife shooter I’d have probably gone down the route you’ve taken in all honesty but for what I do, autofocus performance is a none issue in reality.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto yes, I had a Nikon D7500 DSLR and the video capability was not good like you say. I have not tried the Nikon mirrorless. Yes, for what you do, the Olympus system is very good. I have heard good things about the OM-1 for wildlife but am too "sold on" and also invested in Canon that I am not interested in switching. Good luck!
Another enjoyable video Chris. You are completely on the money when you said that the camera is a tool and if your choice of format or brand meets your needs then go for it. I enjoy using multiple types of camera gear, MFT amongst them, but I will occasionally pick up an old 3.2 mp Nikon 995. Why? Because I enjoy photography and the challenge of getting the best out of whatever camera I happen to have with me.
I just think the time has come to move on and away from some kind of sentimentality I feel towards Canon. There are better options out there for me and it’s time to explore them.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto Very true Chris, there are a lot of useful features on MFT cameras. Mirrorless is definitely the future. I suppose am guilty of sentimentality about just one camera, my 1st 35mm, a Zorki 4K that I got new in 1973! and still use.
I moved from the Canon 7D mk2 with Sigma 70-200 f2.8 that I used for football photography to the Olympus EM-1 Mk2 with Olympus 40-150 f2.8 and never regretted it
Thanks mate. Always fills me with confidence to hear others have done similar and not regretted it. It’s a big call on my part this one.
I shoot with a 7D and am seriously thinking of a jump to Olympus. The 7d is long in the tooth and I can't believe it's still going strong. Would like lighter equipment too. Good to hear of your positive experience.
Canon to Olympus7 years ago and I am very happy. look at the Panasonic 12-60mm f2.8-4. Weather sealed very clean photos and you know 24-120 view on canon. Great all around lens for pretty much everything.
I’ve not regretted anything about the switch so far. Looking forward to some nicer weather to really get stuck in with it.
See, you've got the point. Canon is jewellery and Olympus is a fantastic tool. I turned off all the noises and the camera is so discreet that nobody knows I'm shooting. You're going to have a lot of fun with that kit.
Thanks John. It’s not somewhere I ever thought I’d find myself with regards to Canon. I’ve pulled the trigger with MPB and ordered all of the kit I mentioned at the end of the video 😁
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto you'll not be disappointed. I started my journey with micro four thirds in 2016 with the underated, but extremely capable gem in the form of the Lumix GX80, then acquired a G1 and a GH1 and a G5. In 2019 I went for the EM1ii, and have never regretted it, it's a camera that was well ahead of its time, and still stands up very well today, it's my go to over my Canon 5D and 6D. Coupled with Pro Glass it provides superb image quality. I use the 12-40mm f2.8, 40-150mm f2.8, 25mm f1.2, 30mm Macro and 17mm f1.8. Olympus glass is superb quality.
I don't know about that, Olympus is like a toy camera. It's so tiny and has to design things to fit in a smaller form factor. I do get that some people prefer the smallness, but for larger men it's a massive problem. I've got a 5d with a similar lens to the one that he was using and it's not that hard to deal with. A smaller camera would be too light to reliably hold.
I have been a photography enthusiast since childhood and I have been shooting with Canon for around 15 years . Over that time I have built up an extensive collection of lenses and DSLR bodies.
I shoot a wide range of genres , these days mostly wildlife , landscape and travel .
I'm not getting any younger(late 50s) and my fitness level is beginning to decline . I find that my once loved Canon gear is just too bulky and heavy these days , and technology has moved on , particularly in terms of focus tracking .
I had considered moving to Canon mirrorless, but their policy on third party lenses killed off that idea . I considered m43 but couldn't live with its inherent compromises .
Long story short , I'm in the process of transitioning to Sony .
I looked at Sony a couple of years ago. My bank account didn’t like Sony. I’ve owned a couple of Canon mirrorless cameras and given how late they got to the party, they could have done better.
@Chris Baitson It was the same when I started to think about it a couple of years ago . These days used , low milage a7iii or even a7r3s are available in my price range .
Olympus is so much fun and so capable with so many great modes and settings..!
I switched 12 months ago and I love it!
Honestly cannot say I regret the decision. Been having a blast with them.
Looking at doing exactly the same. Recently bought a used E-M10 ii and 25mm f1.8 and absolutely love it.
Just getting back into digital now retired (mainly use analogue,) I've found I don't look forward to trudging round with my 7D, three lenses, filters, tripod etc etc. No fun at all.
So decided to trade in my 70-200 f2.8L ii and 100 f2.8L macro for an E-M1 mkii and 12-40 f2.8.
Only hesitating as MPB don't specify shutter count on their bodies..
MPB do show shutter counts for some, but not all, it’s frustrating. I tend to avoid anything on the cheaper end of their scale and look for the more expensive good/excellent rated gear in the hopes that the shutter count reflects in the price. It’s a good point you raise about them though.
switched from nikon in 2013 to olympus the nikon was staying in the boot of the car more and more have two em1 mk11 s one with 12-40 f2.8 one with a 60mm macro or 40-150 f2.8 depends what I am doing flower or motersport for example pro lenses are so sharp . as is the amazing 85mm f1.8 all I pick up used .i think you are spot on .
I’m proud of you mate. It takes courage to change your system, and you did it. May I be so bold to suggest that you upgrade to the 12-45 f4 pro and the 40-150 f4 pro. I’m so happy with mine and they are still small and light mated with my E-M5 mk2. I’ve never been happier. Keep up with your amazing work.
I got the 12-40 in the post today. It’s a really nice lens. Had a small panic before I realised it has a MF clutch but I’m chuffed with it now!
I used a lot of m43 today and I am pretty pleased, only wish I had better light.
Light is always something you can work on, around or with though my friend.
Great video! I switched from Canon too a long time ago to Panasonic Micro Four Thirds cameras, and never really looked back! With Micro 4/3 the cameras and lenses are actually smaller, and as you said, the image quality is actually good.
Chris all my gears Canon.
Just got a em10 mk 2 just as a starter to give it a go on this 4/3rds system .if it catches on might fully move over .As you say you haven't got to carry a enormous backpack of gear around .and at my age I find it a bit of a weight .crack on mate
It was the EM-10 Mark ii that kick started all of this for me. Having used that I realised there were things about the Canon cameras that I just don’t care about, and the Olympus did things that made my life easier. It’s all a compromise but it’s one that works for me!
Cheers mate LOL have just invested in a 5D Mk iii, awaiting delivery.
I've lost count how many times I've changed systems because I wanted to try something different :) I would say if you can afford a little more try and get the mark III. It's a baby e-mx. Has handheld high rest mode, built in ND filters and starry af sky modes. The built in ND filters and hand held high res mode alone make the upgrade worth it imo. Good luck with the change.
I have the M1x. A small camera it is not, I saw one in a shop next to a 1Dx III. While the difference is clear, it's a lot less than I expected.
@@oneeyedphotographer That's why I suggested the em1 mk III as it's like a small version of the e-mx :)
I looked at the Mkiii and while I can afford I’d, the money is better spent on glass at this point I think. Live ND and the hand held hi res modes do sound fun though.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto I have the Panasonic G9 which is an amazing M43 camera but doesn't have the phase detect of the Olympus. I don't shoot a lot of video and the single point to point focusing on the panasonic is the quickest I've ever used on any camera system. I'll look forward to watching your videos when you get the em1 mk II :)
You’re probably not losing anything in DR, plus the Olympus EM1 Mk II is a great sports/wildlife camera if you ever want to give that a go. I’ve a GH5 which is a far better stills camera than it gets credit for but the EM1 series cameras are tempting. As for switching systems I’m a bit of a gear hoarder I have 7 mounts/systems, what I can tell you is sensor size/brands don’t nearly matter as much as some people make out they do. Enjoy the videos keep up the good work
Thanks mate. Someone who actually gets it. DR is this overhyped monster than too many folks get wrapped up in!
Great video. 4/3 system is light and saved my back :). I still have the Nikon system and do use it once in a while.
While not saying goodbye to Canon I did ditch my RP and will probably will never go to their RF line full frame or crop. I absolutely LOVE the EF-M cameras, having the EOS M (w/ Magic Lantern), M50 and M200, for their incredible portability and flexibility with a near limitless combination of adaptable vintage lenses. That said my other rig is a Panasonic G85 which I love as well there’s just something about MFT that just works.
Switched from Sony FF and APSC to LUMIX MFT. The compactness of MFT lenses (weight and size) the lower cost of both body and lenses, the excellent IBIS and finally the menu and intuitive touch screen is what pulled me over. The only thing still better on the Sony is the AF but on LUMIX it’s not as bad as a lot of reviewers make it appear. Especially with the latest lenses AF is good.
the best camera is the one you have with you, my om-1 is inseparable from me compact powerful unobtrusive rugged the list goes on and on
The best camera for me is the one that gives me everything I need. I’m hoping this switch gives me just that!
The 12-40/2.8 is a superb lens …perhaps slightly too big on my E-M5. Like you I’m considering moving up to the E-M1, it’s a perfect match for this lens. I’m keeping my 5D mk1 though, I just couldn’t bring myself to part company with it.
There is also the 12-45 F4, also a pro lens.
I’m holding onto a lot of it purely because it’s Canon. I wanted the 5D3 for so long and when I finally got one it just wasn’t what I wanted it to be and I feel I’ve finally found something that works for me!
I’m so happy to change my canon equipment for my Olympus is the best I have no regrets just satisfactions, I have the ‘em-1 mark 1 and I feel that I don’t need more. I like the photography no video, I can’t wait for buy more lenses and enjoy the photography.
Great to hear!
I made the switch to Olympus from Nikon just over a year ago and I don’t regret it!
That 12-40 will blow you away. Sharp !
I hope so. I’m hoping it on a level with my 24-105 L series lens as my go to all a rounder.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto it’ll be sharper than that lens.
Just switched from an A7C with mainly Tamron lenses, to an OM-5 with 2 pro f4 lenses and the 60mm macro. Couldn’t be happier.
I still use the e m1.1. I pucked up a g7 on clearance. Had no need but i love the silver/grey color. I never print larger than 16x20 so 16mp is plenty
Nice video. Take a look at the 14 to 150.. A hidden gem of a lens
Not come across that lens yet. I’ll have a look for one.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto It's great for hiking. get the version II. I used it for some head shots two days ago. I was surprised on how good the results were . Typically I would have used the 40 to 150 2.8
I bought an Olympus OM 10 Mark ii as a second camera to my Nikon. Because it was to be my second camera I didn't invest in many lenses but you are inspiring me to move to Olympus fully as I love the camera. I am taking note of the lenses you recommend. My only gripe is the OM share app, which is not good and can be so frustrating it stops me taking my camera out as the photos won't transfer easily to my phone. If I could find a better way to transfer my images I'd love to use my Olympus as my main camera.
I've never regretted switching from Canon the Olympus. Enjoy!
Thanks for the comment. Fills me with hope of others haven’t regretted it.
M43 form factor is great I think but it needs a new sensor. For bird photography it is the lightest setup with interchangeable lenses and often a tripod is not required because of its excellent IBIS. However, if you crop frequently or pixel peep, you should compare it carefully with the heavier and bigger APS-C combo. The form factor gap is no longer as big as it once was.
Before you spring for the 12-40, hope you take a good look at the 12-45 f4. If you don't need 2.8 that's a kickass little lens. Smaller, lighter, weather sealed, and just as sharp.
I did actually take a look at that lens but opted for the faster of the two for the odd time I head out at night.
I love cameras, but for me, they are tools (sometimes toys). I have long said that most cameras can create professional-level images in the right hands. I usually use my Canon 5D IV and III when I do professional work. Why? Because I have the lenses needed, and I love their robust design and control surfaces. However, when I'm out and about, I use a smaller camera, most frequently a Canon M6 Mark II.
I once shot an entire professional job (it ran for several months) using a very consumer-level Micro 4 3 camera (I don't remember the model, but it was already several years old when I used it). The job involved documenting a complete home renovation, and I needed something very small and agile. The images were great, but the camera failed (actually, the lens failed) when someone knocked it down (around 2 feet). That is why I like robust cameras for pro work. However, I always prefer a smaller camera for hiking, street photography, and even landscapes. It is a drag to carry around a giant camera and a big lens (or lenses). Plus, I can bring a lightweight travel tripod with ease. Such a tripod would never support my 5D IV.
Oh, here is another dirty little secret. My 5D IV has an automatic HDR feature that I often use when doing architectural interiors. It produces good results but also gives me the original bracketed images. I can use the in-camera image ninety percent of the time, but I can always convert the bracketed images if needed. Yes, that means I often shoot in JPEG. Guess what? It works, and my customers are happy. The bottom line is to do and use what works for you, not what some influencer tells you you should do.
welcome to the family :D
Haha thanks man.
for landscape, consider the 12-100 f/4. You may find yourself never reaching for another lens.
@@JezdziecBezNicka should this trade with MPB be as the quote says I’ll have some change left over. I’m going to have a look at one of those now. Thanks for the input.
I did not go down to micro 4 thirds but I did move to crop sensor for the easy to carry package.
I've been shooting the e-m1 mark ii for the past year and use it as a hybrid. It does great video and photo. I don't think olympus gets enough credit for its auto focus. The only weakness i've found with the Olympus vs my full-frame cameras is the dynamic range.
I’ve not tried the EM1 for video just yet but the codec looks spot on. I used to record on my Canon RP at 60mbps so essentially I can quadruple the bit rate, I like the sound of that.
Hard to beat the smaller Fujifilm (xe/x pro) cameras with Fujicrons for a great size/image combo.
Are you trading in all the Canon gear? Ultimate IQ is still with the 35mm image sensor. I use a E-M1 mk3 as my main camera and truly love it, no hesitation taking with me when I head out. For me that is biggest take away for using a smaller system.