Positive externalities | Consumer and producer surplus | Microeconomics | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacadem...
    Factoring in external benefits
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacadem...
    Microeconomics on Khan Academy: Topics covered in a traditional college level introductory microeconomics course
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy's Microeconomics channel: / channel
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...

Комментарии • 54

  • @TheQsanity
    @TheQsanity 9 лет назад +157

    How does Khan know every subject?? lol

    • @myeongcho485
      @myeongcho485 9 лет назад +10

      Yes, he is the master sage :) ask him anything and he'll give the correct answer

    • @DS-ff6ze
      @DS-ff6ze 7 лет назад +12

      He teaches most subjects at introductory level, so he's a jack of all trades.

    • @riqui5406
      @riqui5406 6 лет назад +85

      he probably learns them watching Khan academy

    • @senthilvikramvodapalli1586
      @senthilvikramvodapalli1586 4 года назад +5

      But not better than my Google assistant. She even knows personal information of yours :)

    • @樂樂樂-l5m
      @樂樂樂-l5m 4 года назад +3

      @@senthilvikramvodapalli1586 you are just a scammer.

  • @MrFlob85
    @MrFlob85 6 лет назад +32

    "Quantity... quantity... QUANTITY..." "nice tree... nice tree... NICE TREE..."

  • @DisasterBanana
    @DisasterBanana 6 лет назад +9

    i never should have taken an AP economics course...

  • @MrOllyMC
    @MrOllyMC 8 лет назад +10

    Is this the same as the MPB/MSB/MSC that the UK Specification teaches?

    • @fentondavies4308
      @fentondavies4308 8 лет назад +1

      pretty much I think. I do as-level so might be slightly different at a-level

  • @denizyuksel8936
    @denizyuksel8936 4 года назад +6

    apparently you khan learn anything

  • @beomkomap
    @beomkomap 3 года назад +8

    Despite some of the negative comments, Im understanding this video fully and found it super helpful. Hopefully can meet you in person one day sir!

  • @pravs91
    @pravs91 11 лет назад +16

    Thank you so much. I think I can pass the exam tmoro :D

    • @LucciOW
      @LucciOW 3 года назад +4

      so did you end up passing

  • @92msgir
    @92msgir 10 лет назад +15

    god bless you.

  • @ThePeterDislikeShow
    @ThePeterDislikeShow 3 года назад +2

    Wearing a mask in 2020 is almost entirely externality. Do these principles still work in the same way?

  • @StephandaSilva
    @StephandaSilva 12 лет назад +7

    Instead of adding the $10/tree to the demand curve, could you also deduct it from the marginal cost curve?

    • @樂樂樂-l5m
      @樂樂樂-l5m 4 года назад +5

      8 years, no reply for you. Khan = Khant.

    • @caden7683
      @caden7683 9 месяцев назад

      yea

  • @rizalATmarcos
    @rizalATmarcos 12 лет назад +2

    I gave up watching stupid videos on utube coz I've enrolled at KHAN ACADEMY! my substitute to 'music to my ears'

  • @jawneejawstar909
    @jawneejawstar909 2 года назад +2

    nice tree

  • @paul1964uk
    @paul1964uk 12 лет назад +6

    But is it worth it, just by looking at the positions of the curves? @5:03 you could have an extra 1million trees/pa planted, but you have to give (2.7+1.0)million tax credits - and the 'deadweight' loss only looks like (1.0 million * $10)/2. That looks like $37m forgone for an imputed added benefit (from higher consumption) of $5million.

  • @Chiwun992
    @Chiwun992 9 лет назад +5

    life saver

  • @gozdavid9671
    @gozdavid9671 10 лет назад +4

    when you are writing, you are repeating words. you should keep talking.

  • @louiswilliams8534
    @louiswilliams8534 Год назад

    why is math always so macro?! i need something else, like words or story or something

  • @Yassine__2.0
    @Yassine__2.0 11 месяцев назад

    Hey,
    I want to ask you how did you knew that it was 3,7 milion.
    What did you do to become to that answer?

  • @cfjrb
    @cfjrb 6 лет назад +3

    The benefit is not all conferred on the consumer side. The new higher demand curve after the subsidy will result in a higher price along with the higher quantity so some of the benefit will go to the suppliers.

  • @mike68536
    @mike68536 10 лет назад +1

    so what was the optimal level of production?

  • @picklerick3136
    @picklerick3136 4 года назад +1

    Cristal clear!!!!

  • @Poppop-xl1jl
    @Poppop-xl1jl 6 лет назад +2

    There's a typo in the closed captioning at 3:10. It says "we're not talking about positive externalities," but what sal actually says is "we're now talking about positive externalities." you should change that so people don't get confused

  • @derekeano
    @derekeano 2 года назад

    Why do trees get more expensive to plant with a higher quality of trees to plant? Why does the cost per tree increase?

    • @nicolastorres147
      @nicolastorres147 Год назад

      The demand curve shifts up, making the price that producers receive increase. But with the tax credit, you get the price that consumers pay by going down to the demand curve, which is lower than 20 dollars.
      Price received by producers = About $25 > $20
      Price paid by consumers = Producer price - tax credit = $25 - $10 = $15 < $20
      So both parties are better off.

  • @jameslewis5534
    @jameslewis5534 5 лет назад

    You sound like Eli the Computer Guy! Are you?

  • @rajdeepsinhjadeja218
    @rajdeepsinhjadeja218 7 лет назад

    Is their welfare loss in positive externality ?

  • @salis5941
    @salis5941 3 года назад

    this is so confusing

  • @Ashton_ls
    @Ashton_ls Год назад

    Saviour❤

  • @treytimberlake1334
    @treytimberlake1334 2 года назад

    Who here is taking the SAT tomorrow XDDDDD

  • @Fongdoggie123
    @Fongdoggie123 9 лет назад +4

    extremely confusing mate

  • @charleslombe8501
    @charleslombe8501 10 лет назад

    thanks a lot

  • @mai2xs
    @mai2xs 12 лет назад

    Accidentes chistoso

  • @glenndwyer3071
    @glenndwyer3071 6 лет назад +1

    Wouldn’t such “external” benefits increase the consumers willingness to pay so be factored in, in the original demand curve? (Given that the demand curve depicts the price a consumer wants to pay, the reasons a consumer wants to pay a certain price are in fact determined by pest control, air quality and niceness)

  • @fatmaalsharif3448
    @fatmaalsharif3448 9 лет назад +2

    thank you

  • @thelord9999
    @thelord9999 9 лет назад +3

    khan you make everything more worse off, sorry.