Freedom applies to some but not others!!!- Lancaster, PA 7-12-22

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 дек 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @tylerjacobsen1453
    @tylerjacobsen1453 2 года назад +3

    I just discovered your channel today, I have to say, great videos man! Been binging on them

    • @3601chuck
      @3601chuck  2 года назад

      There are 1st Amendment Auditors all across America. There aren't too many of us in Pennsylvania that I'm aware of. Every auditor has their own style. Our current administration in Washington D.C. is constantly trying to strip away our fundamental rights to the 1st Amendment. I appreciate your comment. Thanks for watching!

  • @Poordirtfarmer
    @Poordirtfarmer Год назад

    👁👁

    • @3601chuck
      @3601chuck  Год назад

      Heyyy there PDF...Happy Sunday to ya😎

  • @tangara7166
    @tangara7166 Год назад

    I'm ashamed that you were involved in the fire department. If you want to get closer, get permission from land owners, but you know they'll kick you to the curb, voyeur.

  • @AndersonMedia
    @AndersonMedia 2 года назад +1

    The lady you talked with could pass for a Karen. Was in fire service too and as you know give someone a badge goes to their head. But your right why can others get close and you cant

    • @3601chuck
      @3601chuck  2 года назад

      I guess what really yanked my chain was that there were two couples who were walking their dogs. All four walked right past the perimeter, then walked right in front of the scene, pulled out their phones and took pictures. Then they continued to walk on. The difference was that I said I was press 😂

  • @axlfox4048
    @axlfox4048 2 года назад +1

    The point to be made is the residents who were able to be across the street either lived in that house or had permission from the residents of said house to be on that property and that's why they could be closers because you can't MAKE someone leave THEIR property or tell them who can or can't occupy THEIR property unless an emergency evacuation is ordered. The fire was contained to the one residence so neighboring houses were under no threat to their health or safety so no one can tell them or make the do anything regarding the property they own or pay rent for. You on the other hand only had access to PUBLIC space which means you COULD be told where you can or can't go because you have no right to privacy in a publicly owned and occupied space. I'm sure if you asked one of the residents closer they would have allowed you to stand on their property but you didn't. Just be glad she let you get closer then the original 150 ft don't be ungrateful

    • @3601chuck
      @3601chuck  2 года назад

      I agree with you but these were people who walked in from several blocks away.

  • @g.t.richardson6311
    @g.t.richardson6311 2 года назад +1

    Some common sense prevailed

  • @Moleinhole
    @Moleinhole 2 года назад

    So where is the story! YOU KNOW AS A INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST!!!! WHO ! WHAT! WHERE! WHEN ! WHY????? your story where is it???

  • @MrTyson-cp4iz
    @MrTyson-cp4iz 2 года назад

    Boo hoo . Locals , like the people who live by the incident with property by the incident are different than looky loos with cameras . They had every right to keep people out of the area

    • @3601chuck
      @3601chuck  2 года назад +1

      I agree with you but people were walking into the scene from 3 and 4 blocks away so they didn't have property by the incident.

    • @MrTyson-cp4iz
      @MrTyson-cp4iz 2 года назад +1

      @@3601chuck a family lost their home and may have suffered personal loss or injury of family members, have a little class.

  • @truthseeker2314
    @truthseeker2314 2 года назад

    Prejudice