Bach is the legend of all time. Plus this was an amazing pianist and an amazing flutist. I fully enjoyed the duet. Thanks for uploading. woow. and wooow.
This recording makes me believe that this was intended for the modern piano and flute. Both Flutist and Pianist play it so incredibly nicely . It’s so healing. Thank you for uploading and sharing this wonderful performance. ❤️ from Amsterdam
Most electric I've ever heard in this last movement! This recording is the greatest argument for using a piano in the place of a harpsichord in Bach flute sonatas that I've heard!
Absolutely wonderful playing and this has quickly become a favorite piece of mine. Interesting to hear on a modern concert flute and piano, since this was originally intended to be played with a harpsichord and traverso (baroque flute).
Merci à Meri Bojic-Radojcic et à Marija Spasic pour ce bijou. Prise de son très équilibrée, grande sensibilité de la pianiste et beau jeu de la flutiste. Un enchantement… bravo
Excellent rendition - a real pleasure to find this out here in the YT 'landscape'. I have ever loved Bach flute and harpsicord pieces; proof that even we 'heathen' guitar players have a soul after all :D.
I have listened to this so many times. I compare this to Emmanuel Pahud's play, one is from heaven, pure and perfect, but a little cold. On the other hand, this one is earthly real and graceful. It's not perfect, but has a lot of live, a lot of warmth. I prefer this one.
Although some people say "This wasn't written by J.S Bach", I love this tune. And I must admit that this is on top level at artistic aspect comparing with other Bach's flute sonatas . Besides, this beautiful flute player with little bit slight sadness is extraordinarily attractive. Of course, her flute playing is so excellent and accurate. Finally I shall inform next thing.! "Her enthusiastic fans are gradually increasing among Japanese classic music fans. " From Tokyo
Thank you so much for a beautiful performance. There's debate in the comments about whether this is JS or CPE. I have the idea that it's JS, but wasn't written for flute. Don't care much, it's beautiful! Still prefer the baroque (wooden) flute, but strangely not the harpsichord, which can't sing. Rather have a piano or clavichord than a harpsichord. But nobody would hear the clavichord.... Your interpretation (both) is delightful.
Such a lovely performance! I feel the vibrato could be less, as during the baroque era it was considered an ornament in the music. It adds a nice color to the music, just could be less in certain areas. However, I don't mind it. Also, I wish people would be would calm down with who wrote it. It was inauthentically believed to be written by J.S. Bach, so that means they believed J.S. Bach wrote but they could confirm it. This, if people would look this up, was either due to no one claiming it was their own or in order to sell more of the music, people would say that J.S. Bach wrote it. With all the research, it does point to C.P.E Bach writing it. However, that is not a reason to get angry about her putting J.S. Bach instead of C.P.E Bach. All the purchasable copies of the sonatas still say this is by J.S. Bach, so technically you say J.S. Bach. Also, it says, on the Bärenreiter edition, these pieces are for flute and obbligato harpsichord. So, say she was using Bärenreiter, it would be appropriate to put in the title "J.S. Bach, Sonata in g minor for Flute and Harpsichord" as that's what the book says. Also, if you were to cite this performance or the book, you would cite it as the title says. So to those people saying it's C.P.E. Bach, J.S. Bach, too much vibrato, and the title is wrong. Calm down! She was likely in college at this time so she might've been still learning about this era, and she likely used the title of the piece for the RUclips title. People need to learn to be more positive with critiques.
Every flutist knows about this theory, that is probably true, but since the Sonata is traditionally attributed to JS Bach, so it is often titled. If one wants to be full scholar (and full pedant) it is enough to title it from "Pseudo-Johann Sebastian Bach", which is how pseudoepigraphic writings are named in academic circles.
Красив звук, плътен нисък регистър,красиво филиране в бавните части! Но и пианото, и флейтата в бързите части , според мен, бяха извън стила "Бах", защото най - характерната му черта - щрихът non legato, почти в цялата първа част, при осминковите трайности, се свиреше tenuto.Чуйте Паю (Pahud) , как изпълнява Бах. Според мен,той е най - близо до стила "Бах"!
Beautiful, but in my opinion the first movement is too fast. If you would play it slower you would have a better variance to the last movement, because this should be the fastest. But anyway, amazing flutist and of course pianist. You two show lots of emotion in that piece. Very dynamic! :) xx
+Jaime Garrido Bergholtz That's why experts today are mostly sure, that this Sonata is NOT J.S. Bach, but his son, Carl Philipp Emanuel, who WAS indeed romantic as hell. :)
@@selinatu6082 yes you can do it! Just remember Rome was not built in just one day, so you will not get all movements in one day or one week. If you succeed in solving a single difficult phrase in one or in a few days, it is already a victory.
Sorry for the late answer. Beyond any doubt it is polyphonic, since it has three voices: flute, piano right hand, and piano left hand. Each voice has a different melody with an independent although synchronized rhythm.
It was good, but she didn't really play dynamics that much. I could barely tell. Also, she didn't use flattma (finger vibrato). That what the fluists did instead of the modern vibrato. Bach wrote for the baroque flute.
Playing without conventional vibrato and trying to mimic baroque flute playing has its own technical challenges and demands a great mastery and versatility that one who didn't study flute cannot tell. A great artist as Emmanuel Pahud is one of the few who is able to do that in a great extent and in an artistically convincing way, but he has a more than human control of breathing, tone, embochure, tuning, sound color and dynamics, doing things that are almost spontaneous in a wood traverso but not so in a modern flute. Somebody even said below that this lady should never play Bach with vibrato. First, Bach didn't ask anybody to say who can or cannot play his pieces. Second, if one searches recent recordings from this flutist, one sees the evolution in tone and in a more controlled and discreet vibrato, and an ever sweeter and clearer tone. However, if one doesn't play the pieces their teacher told them to play, and doesn't face the public, one will never learn nor evolve. It is always easier criticizing than doing.
As for the usage of flattement, or finger vibrato, although unconventional it is possible to use it in a modern flute. But that will never have a convincing effect if not integrated in another way of playing that is almost like another instrument, or at least another speciality.
And thats no flauto travero either. Its a modern flute and a piano. They play beautifully in a romantic way. Pity the baroque music. Know your history.
This is such an inappropriate comment. Be more positive. My professors have never said anything as rude as this, and they've studied with world renowned flutists. They've told me, it's not the most appropriate to use a lot a vibrato as it's an ornament, and the baroque flute was not capable of a lot of it. I only comment as I see your profile, and I'm going to guess you're a professional. Well, saying something as snarky and deprecating as that, you are obviously in no place to be a teacher. You should really think before you say something so rude, especially on the internet. Something more appropriate to say would be, "I don't personally agree with that amount of vibrato, it doesn't fit with Bach. Maybe try this......". So, much more appropriate than what you said.
Bach is the legend of all time. Plus this was an amazing pianist and an amazing flutist. I fully enjoyed the duet. Thanks for uploading. woow. and wooow.
This recording makes me believe that this was intended for the modern piano and flute. Both Flutist and Pianist play it so incredibly nicely . It’s so healing. Thank you for uploading and sharing this wonderful performance. ❤️ from Amsterdam
I like her flowing style and the pianist's precision.
The more you listen to this the more you realise that the flautist’s playing is close to perfect. (The pianist is superb too)
0:08 Allegro
4:15 Adagio
6:47 Allegro
Bravo! 👏
I adored this sonata since my childhood, this presentation is absolutely wonderful. Thank you
Most electric I've ever heard in this last movement! This recording is the greatest argument for using a piano in the place of a harpsichord in Bach flute sonatas that I've heard!
you two just made me love this piece I decided I'm gonna learn to play this masterpiece. thanks!
A very beautiful piano part too, very challenging and beautiful
Absolutely wonderful playing and this has quickly become a favorite piece of mine.
Interesting to hear on a modern concert flute and piano, since this was originally intended to be played with a harpsichord and traverso (baroque flute).
Terrific work together. Thank you for your wonderful interpretation.
Merci à Meri Bojic-Radojcic et à Marija Spasic pour ce bijou. Prise de son très équilibrée, grande sensibilité de la pianiste et beau jeu de la flutiste. Un enchantement… bravo
❤️
J'ai oublié de vous dire que je suis ravi de vous écouté. Magnifique !; ça me fait plaisir de passer mon temps cette très belle musique. Merci !!
amazingly beautiful tone what a beautiful old sheet music for this piece
I see
Great and also is correct the speed. A greeting from italy
Excellent rendition - a real pleasure to find this out here in the YT 'landscape'. I have ever loved Bach flute and harpsicord pieces; proof that even we 'heathen' guitar players have a soul after all :D.
I have listened to this so many times. I compare this to Emmanuel Pahud's play, one is from heaven, pure and perfect, but a little cold. On the other hand, this one is earthly real and graceful. It's not perfect, but has a lot of live, a lot of warmth. I prefer this one.
❤️❤️❤️
pahud is perfection ... very good girl, but pahud remains pahud
very wonderful! I loved the last movement, your dedication to the piece truly shines through!
The first movement is a little bit fast, but in general your interpretations is really awosome and really great ! I do love it !
so beautiful interpretation .. thank you
Although some people say "This wasn't written by J.S Bach", I love this tune. And I must admit that this is on top level at artistic aspect comparing with other Bach's flute sonatas .
Besides, this beautiful flute player with little bit slight sadness is extraordinarily attractive. Of course, her flute playing is so excellent and accurate. Finally I shall inform next thing.! "Her enthusiastic fans are gradually increasing among Japanese classic music fans. "
From Tokyo
So smooth.
Thank you so much for a beautiful performance. There's debate in the comments about whether this is JS or CPE. I have the idea that it's JS, but wasn't written for flute. Don't care much, it's beautiful! Still prefer the baroque (wooden) flute, but strangely not the harpsichord, which can't sing. Rather have a piano or clavichord than a harpsichord. But nobody would hear the clavichord.... Your interpretation (both) is delightful.
Also, she is playing with the modern flute vibrato. She apparently doesn't know HIP (historically informed performance.
Miss those happy times when I could rock that sonata as well as this lovely lady)
Very nice!
BEAUTIFUL! VERY NICE TONE!
Nice awesome playing
Beautiful ❤️
That's amazing. Eventhough I think it's written by CPE Bach.
Bravo. La pianista es excelente. La flautista muy buen tono.
so beautiful!
Very well..
7:13 this circle of fifths make me cry
Very good pianist!
Beautiful. It does sound a bit more like C.PE. I love her light touch. Delicate playing. Thank you. The phrasing and colour are not so like J'S.
Lovely
lOVE IT
Very nice!! :)))
Such a lovely performance! I feel the vibrato could be less, as during the baroque era it was considered an ornament in the music. It adds a nice color to the music, just could be less in certain areas. However, I don't mind it. Also, I wish people would be would calm down with who wrote it. It was inauthentically believed to be written by J.S. Bach, so that means they believed J.S. Bach wrote but they could confirm it. This, if people would look this up, was either due to no one claiming it was their own or in order to sell more of the music, people would say that J.S. Bach wrote it. With all the research, it does point to C.P.E Bach writing it. However, that is not a reason to get angry about her putting J.S. Bach instead of C.P.E Bach. All the purchasable copies of the sonatas still say this is by J.S. Bach, so technically you say J.S. Bach. Also, it says, on the Bärenreiter edition, these pieces are for flute and obbligato harpsichord. So, say she was using Bärenreiter, it would be appropriate to put in the title "J.S. Bach, Sonata in g minor for Flute and Harpsichord" as that's what the book says. Also, if you were to cite this performance or the book, you would cite it as the title says. So to those people saying it's C.P.E. Bach, J.S. Bach, too much vibrato, and the title is wrong. Calm down! She was likely in college at this time so she might've been still learning about this era, and she likely used the title of the piece for the RUclips title. People need to learn to be more positive with critiques.
que lindo
nice pianist
It has been discovered that this Violin Sonata belongs to Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach, one of Johann's children.
Grazie !!!!!
控えめ、こうした奏法も賛同します。この方がマルタンやジョリベ作品をどのように表現するか、楽しみです。近代作品ではフルートとはいえ、相当にストロングな音量や表現が要求されるのかもです😄
Merci ... !
Gran flautista.
I lack the use of tonguing fx at the syncopation at the first bars in the first part which effects the Baroque rhthmycal style .
And pianist's name?
Meri Bojic- Radojcic :)
very good pianist work!
Really amazing... I loved it. What kind of flute do you play?
Thank you! This was my first flute. It was an old Yamaha, maybe 311 or something like that.
ピアノの楽譜 使い込んでます。
I’m playing this on the saxophone for my adbanced recital, does anyone know if this is the correct speed for the first movement?
I have an arrangement, hand written, of this piece by the late Vince Macaluso for classical guitar, six pages.
Omg could you maybe put it on youtube??? Please!!!
0:46
However it isn`t Johann Sebastian Bach, but his son - Carl Filipp Emanuel Bach!
JS has composed it for violin, CPE has transposed for flute
Could be also that CPE tryied to claim it's his as he did with some JS's pieces.
Every flutist knows about this theory, that is probably true, but since the Sonata is traditionally attributed to JS Bach, so it is often titled.
If one wants to be full scholar (and full pedant) it is enough to title it from "Pseudo-Johann Sebastian Bach", which is how pseudoepigraphic writings are named in academic circles.
I'm sure he was talking about what brand of flute she's playing.
Karly Rieth it is the modern flute.
Красив звук, плътен нисък регистър,красиво филиране в бавните части! Но и пианото, и флейтата в бързите части , според мен, бяха извън стила "Бах", защото най - характерната му черта - щрихът non legato, почти в цялата първа част, при осминковите трайности, се свиреше tenuto.Чуйте Паю (Pahud) , как изпълнява Бах. Според мен,той е най - близо до стила "Бах"!
Where can I get the sheet music for both parts?
Imslp.org
lol, super...
Beautiful, but in my opinion the first movement is too fast. If you would play it slower you would have a better variance to the last movement, because this should be the fastest.
But anyway, amazing flutist and of course pianist. You two show lots of emotion in that piece. Very dynamic! :)
xx
And who said that JS Bach was not romantic?
+Jaime Garrido Bergholtz That's why experts today are mostly sure, that this Sonata is NOT J.S. Bach, but his son, Carl Philipp Emanuel, who WAS indeed romantic as hell. :)
DameMitHermelin No, it is not. This is J.S. Bach.
@@meganhallisey7028C.P.E Bach wrote this
Part of the reason why this sounds Romantic is that the pianist insists on playing her part as though it were Chopin.
I’m only 11 and I’m trying this piece . It’s very hard for me ... and the teacher think I’m capable...😥
Yes, you are! Do not worry, carry on working and then give us a good performance! You will make it!
Yves T thank you very much for the encouragement!!!
@@selinatu6082 yes you can do it! Just remember Rome was not built in just one day, so you will not get all movements in one day or one week.
If you succeed in solving a single difficult phrase in one or in a few days, it is already a victory.
@@damascenoribeiro3109 thank you so much! :)
You have this attributed to the wrong Bach Carl Phillip Emanuel Bach wrote this.
Great! - But do you drive a VW? Why do you write BVW? Right it should be BWV!
Could anyone tell me if this is homophonic or polyphonic? I'm new at this!
Thank you very much! :)
Sorry for the late answer. Beyond any doubt it is polyphonic, since it has three voices: flute, piano right hand, and piano left hand. Each voice has a different melody with an independent although synchronized rhythm.
I always do the same little mistake that she did in the first sonate ^-^
Nice. The vibrato is a bit much. But beautifully played.
? CARL BACH
It's called a concert flute.
TheMarcaron this piece was written for a baroque flute.
Nope
Однако, это не Иоганн Себастьян Бах, его сын - ФИЛИПП ЭММАНУИЛ БАХ
Johan Sebastijan Bah?? His name should always be Bach, because of his music code B A C H
smoking hot, good tune too :)
Ew that’s creepy
Of course it’s JS Bach! If it looks like a duck, sounds like a du.....could be someone else I suppose
The piano is too loud. I can hardly hear the flute.
Very strange sound! Too much vibrato!
It was good, but she didn't really play dynamics that much. I could barely tell. Also, she didn't use flattma (finger vibrato). That what the fluists did instead of the modern vibrato. Bach wrote for the baroque flute.
Playing without conventional vibrato and trying to mimic baroque flute playing has its own technical challenges and demands a great mastery and versatility that one who didn't study flute cannot tell.
A great artist as Emmanuel Pahud is one of the few who is able to do that in a great extent and in an artistically convincing way, but he has a more than human control of breathing, tone, embochure, tuning, sound color and dynamics, doing things that are almost spontaneous in a wood traverso but not so in a modern flute.
Somebody even said below that this lady should never play Bach with vibrato. First, Bach didn't ask anybody to say who can or cannot play his pieces. Second, if one searches recent recordings from this flutist, one sees the evolution in tone and in a more controlled and discreet vibrato, and an ever sweeter and clearer tone.
However, if one doesn't play the pieces their teacher told them to play, and doesn't face the public, one will never learn nor evolve. It is always easier criticizing than doing.
As for the usage of flattement, or finger vibrato, although unconventional it is possible to use it in a modern flute. But that will never have a convincing effect if not integrated in another way of playing that is almost like another instrument, or at least another speciality.
Wtf, thats not a harpsichord.. BOOOOOOOOOOOO
And thats no flauto travero either. Its a modern flute and a piano. They play beautifully in a romantic way. Pity the baroque music. Know your history.
+Wim Haak That's not barock, that's galant. And it's not J. S. Bach, it's C. Ph. E. Bach. Harpsichord had been already passé by then.
DameMitHermelin no. It is J.S. Bach. I am listening to this with the score.
with so much vibrato iit is better that you NEVER play Bach!!!!
This is such an inappropriate comment. Be more positive. My professors have never said anything as rude as this, and they've studied with world renowned flutists. They've told me, it's not the most appropriate to use a lot a vibrato as it's an ornament, and the baroque flute was not capable of a lot of it. I only comment as I see your profile, and I'm going to guess you're a professional. Well, saying something as snarky and deprecating as that, you are obviously in no place to be a teacher. You should really think before you say something so rude, especially on the internet. Something more appropriate to say would be, "I don't personally agree with that amount of vibrato, it doesn't fit with Bach. Maybe try this......". So, much more appropriate than what you said.
0:31
0:25