Experts slugfest: 'Killers of the Flower Moon' is here -- will it bring Scorsese another Oscar?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 июл 2024
- Gold Derby editors and Experts Christopher Rosen and Joyce Eng discuss "Killers of the Flower Moon" as the long-awaited epic finally hits theaters this weekend. With the ongoing actors' strike, Martin Scorsese has been flying solo on the campaign trail. What kind of impact will this have? And as expected, Leonardo DiCaprio is back in Chris' predictions. Plus: We discuss the new trailers for "Napoleon," "American Fiction" and "Ferrari," and "The Bikeriders" getting delayed.
Email your questions to slugfests@goldderby.com.
Timestamps:
Intro and "Killers of the Flower Moon" is here (0:00)
Martin Scorsese's solo campaign (3:00)
Best Actor (16:27)
"Flower Moon" casting and production design (26:10)
"Flower Moon" box office potential (30:55)
Listener questions (33:10)
SUBSCRIBE TO GOLD DERBY:
/ goldderby
CONNECT WITH GOLD DERBY
Web: www.goldderby.com/
Facebook: / goldderby
Twitter: / goldderby
Instagram: / goldderby
Newsletter: pages.email.goldderby.com/signup/
ABOUT GOLD DERBY:
Gold Derby features celebrity videos plus expert predictions, tracking who will win Oscars, Emmys, Grammys, Tonys, Golden Globes and top reality TV shows 'The Amazing Race,' 'American Idol,' 'Dancing with the Stars,' 'Survivor,' 'The Voice' and more. 
Развлечения
This is ALL going to change and then some, between "Napoleon" and "The Color Purple" alone . That said, my bet is that "Anatomy" and Sandra will get in, and "Killers" is The One To Watch Against "Oppenheimer." As ever, youse twose are the berries. More, please, thank you.
She Said, lol. I love me sone Ms Mulligan, robbed for PYW, but She Said. Yes, we all knew the story and , yes, i can easily see a movie for what it is, but i found the PBS doc Weinstein more intriguing than She Said. Maybe just me.
Thank you for taking my question. I do hope that "The Holdovers" will do well, both at the box office and with the awards for individual performances/crafts. I want films that can make me laugh - and cry - without having to ask myself if I've become person so different from other people that where they find humor, I only find horror.
Thanks for writing in, Beth! Please reach out any time!
Chris, I have to laugh. Who are the young people who want to be boomers? Young filmmakers? Young musicians? I fully understand the desire to be part of the world when it was analog.@@chrisjrosen
I think rdj will win globes and bafta and Ryan gosling will win GG and critics choice
Yay!
Napoleon could be like Andrea Rosebouroh and be a contender that comes out of nowhere in 2024
I can see the cast of kotfm sweeping most awards
Not Leo.
I feel like RDJ can easily sweep, and even Emma Stone depending on how much love KOTFM gets. She is the only actress I can see winning SAG, Globes, and BAFTA.
I think Sandra Huller could win BAFTA but I agree Emma Stone will sweep the rest (definitely Globes and SAG) maybe Gladstone for Critics Choice
@@rubendove2617 rn, I don't see Gladstone winning any precursor other than maybe golden globes. i think critics choice will go to someone like Stone or Huller.
Lily Gladstone = Rachel Weisz The Constant Gardener
It's incredible how you two make such a big thing about the 3 hrs 26 minute runtime, how it's a "5 hour ordeal" and the like, though you weren't bothered much by the Oppenheimer's runtime, which is only 25 minutes shorter. I also remember that a few years ago hardly anybody was bothered by the Avengers: Endgame 3 hour run time. I don't get it why suddenly it's a big deal.
I think they think that because of the slow pace of Scorsese's latest films. Oppenheimer and Endgame are fast-paced and appear to be shorter than 3 hours.
@@gileadeandradesilvaperfectly stated
@@gileadeandradesilva Firstly, Oppenheimer isn't fast paced, it's mostly men in rooms, talking. Secondly, they don't say it feels long, they say it simply is long, hence "problems watching it in the evening or even in the afternoon" or "a 5-hour ordeal" because you have to drive to a cinema and then go back... So weird, because they didn't voice such problems before.
@@ktom5262 I would just disagree with the Oppenheimer comment. It is absolutely fast-paced and cooks -- you might not think so, but that puts you in a little bit of a minority opinion. That's okay! I think in terms of "a night out at the movies," spending 4-5 hours out for Endgame and Avatar and even Oppenheimer is a bit different because those are "event" films (and as Scorsese has rightly said about Marvel, Endgame is more of a theme-park ride). Flower Moon is an adult drama without the fireworks of those movies. Which is also okay! And it moves and remains engaging because it's Scorsese and Thelma. But it is a fact that a lot of regular people are going to give pause to going to this movie when they might not have for Oppenheimer or Endgame, etc.
Oppenheimer is edited to seem faster paced than Killers of the Flower Moon.
You better put Andrew Scott back in!!!! Now. 😮 jk. But I want him in the 5
I’m going to put Andrew in 1 to try to push him up.