Can you plug a cable into a passenger aircraft and expect it to fly the whole way? No you beed batteries. If the batteries too heavy relative to the amount of energy stored in it. It is not economical to build an aircraft. Larger capacity batteries means more economical airplanes
Dendrites are micro hairs that formminsode of a lithium iron battery causing a short. From being deeply discharged. Past the rated 25 % minimum capacity left.
When I was 6 years old, in 1974, my parents bought me a battery powered motorcycle. It had a lead acid battery in it, the bike itself weighed a lot and it took 24 hours to charge. That charge got me about 10 minutes worth of ride time. The battery failed after roughly 25-35 charge cycles and after that, it was a very heavy push toy. I remember the replacement battery costing nearly as much as the bike itself and my parents never replaced it. And now we have real cars that will charge in a few hours and drive hundreds of miles. I find this all to be amazing
My grandmother had an ALL electric riding lawn mower with a 42" cut that worked wonders. Well enough that it should still be around. However that company disappeared. This was back in the 70's.
But still the promises are too far fetched. I remember reading science magazine in 2012 and they promised us the batteries what we see in this video (up to 1000mw per liter) in about 5 years time. After 5 years, in 2017, i checked the battery technology news and everything was pretty much as before, no changes and the promising technology was all in the near future. Now, 3 years later, as this video shows, we still have no promised batteries and all the technology is still in process.
@@allgoo1990 We dont have solid state batteries in a real mass production and i believe it is because currently working SSB require some very expensive and very rare materials like silver, so it is impossible to produce these batteries in a massive scale and will it be even possible to develope a solid state battery which could be mass produced to the point that it would be in our phones and cars is still questionable.
@Rightious Aggitator LOL, funny you say that, I went searching to see if I could find that some one for a retro fit, but my wife reminded me I'm a 53 yo man 😪😂🤣
@@andrewdirrell7497 Because english is not my first language and I always get those confused. Just like americans confuse "you're" with "your". Thanks for pointing that out. I'll fix it!
Even when the people in your life constantly &pathologically drain you of all your energy for selfish &self-serving reasons. Just be happy they give you enough time for you to recharge. Before doing it again. - John Goodenough
"but these batteries weren't powerful enough to do anything with it" 1909 baker electric car with 160 miles of range: am I a joke to you? EDIT: Wow, great to see so many reactions! :) I want to clarify a little bit. My point was mainly that batteries have always been on the verge of being 'good enough', with how you package/use them being the main limiting factor. Just because it didn't work out practically for commuter cars or long haul trucks doesn't mean there weren't plenty of vehicles that could have easily been partially or fully electrified, from post office vans to city buses etc. For some reason many people have this mentality of 'all or nothing'. People compare energy density of batteries and gasoline as if this is the only thing that changes between vehicle designs, no AC inverters, cooling systems, electric motor, piston motor, clutch, gearbox and transmission shaft... Isn't it weird how opinionated people can get about which technology to use? As if it is a personal matter. I saw some lay people the other day arguing online about which technology should be used for self-driving cars, lidar or cameras. Their argument got so heated, even though they didn't have any stake in the adoption of either of these technologies. They also didn't have any hard statistical data to base any of their arguments on. It was purely based on the feeling each technology gave them. Strange psychology at work. Anyway, thanks for all the replies, it was very interesting to read. Cheers
Electric car preceded the thermal engine ones. Even then people pushed electric out of the way to be able to sell their waste product from oil refining. Had this push not be done the 150 years of evolution in electric battery would have been waaayyy shorter, we'd have way less efficient thermal engines for sure but also way better batteries. As for those talking about safety standard, thermal engines in the 1900s weren't safe by any means either.
John Hue if gas engines weren’t created, we would be so far behind, it’s not even funny. We were no where near viable electric power, while gas was something that was able to be innovated quickly. If we didn’t go to gas, it would have taken cars DECADES longer to get to where we got, using gas power . All because you want your utopia of electric cars? People like you don’t want to admit, just how much of the modern world you enjoy today, exists because of the internal combustion engines. Electric didn’t even come close.
It'll be great if Samsung succeeds with this. Yeh cheaper and longer lasting phone charges maybe even new products, technologies and maybe hook up with Hyundai Motors on their future Autonomous vehicles. Hook them up with solar panels, wind turbines (both onshore and offshore), and other green energies.
It seems like every year for the last 20 years I've seen an article or a news report about a 'revolutionary new battery technology'... And not once has anything actually come of it. We've had tiny incremental tweaks to lithium ion; and that's it. As others here have said, I'll believe it when I see it. It's like fusion power: It always seems to be a few years in the future... then you get to the future, and it's STILL a few years away.
@@DrLazerbeam "....15 years ago have made no discernable difference today..." The only way for all the cancer research to "have made no discernible difference" is for you to willfully ignore the outcomes. Mortality rates have fallen a great deal among a number of types of cancer, even within the last 10 years. Thyroid, breast, prostate, and testicular cancers tend all now have 5-year mortality rates of about 1%. Most melanoma along with Hodkin's and cervical cancers are below 10% mortality in the standard 5 year window. People still die of course, we all do in the end, and some cancers continue to be quite lethal but outlooks have really improved across the board and patients going into remission long enough for cancer not to be a factor in their lifespan is a very real thing, now.
@@lthundertree6385 yes but I'm specifically referring to "these miracle discoveries that scientist think will cure cancer" I'm fully aware that any cure or medicine for cancer will not apply to all cancers so the task is astronomical.
@@DrLazerbeam Bruh he was just pointing out the truth, scientific researchers usually word their research carefully to seem sensational to the scientific community but are usually still pretty technical, scientific articles and media articles are the ones that sensationalize news to get clicks.
It is an exciting time to work on energy storage technology. I'm working on my PhD on Materials used for Energy Storage. I hope to cover content like this one day :) Thanks for sharing!
This was 2 years ago, any breakthroughs? Would be nice to fit an extremely weight and powerful battery in my electric skateboard and have 1000's of km's of range hehe.
James Muecke but we live a globalized world with way more scientists and educated people. Not only that, their are multi billion dollar companies and governments working on this.
James Muecke Honestly, technology is going to be exponential rather than linear. Our mobile devices are amazing computers but those batteries are junk. Once we get to replace our lithium ion technology, I expect beefier and juicier ram, cpu, and gpu in our smartphones. Its going to change everything.....20 hour screen time and 4 day battery life. However, a lot of jobs will be lost.
And probably, like a lot of inventions, it will be discovered by accident. LOL Examples: rubber tyres because testers' boiling pot caught fire and he threw it out the window. Kicked the 'lump' on his way back from getting food and found it was solid. (now tyres are all synthetic made from oil) Example 2: Transistor. Auto electrician fixing early model battery charging fault, leaned on the rectifier circuit and noticed his meter reading changed (his hand was on the negative lead and his other hand was touching the middle of the rectifier (clunky large diode). He investigated it and produced the Transfer Resistor Ta Da "Transistor". Example 3: Stainless Steel: At a steel plant, the failed mixes were dumped on to a growing pile at the back of a factory. Smokers, on a coffee break, noticed weeks later that on layer was not rusting. Piqued management went through the records (after counting the failed layers) and reproduced the alloy mix. Refined it with further trials.
Regrettably it's still the case, improper remedies are administered as a cure, for lack of definitive knowledge and widespread acceptance of such improper medications.
To make his name even more hilarious, his middle name is "Bannister" which effectively causes his name to often being shorted down to "John B. Goodenough" Edit: Research the guy, he totally lives up to his name as he has both worked on developing the first Lithium-ion batteries, RAM for computers and is now working on the next gen batteries.
3:06 Decreasing the number of batteries does _not_ make them charge faster. Higher energy density just means they take up less space - you still need to put the same amount of electrical energy in - the vehicle/motor haven't got any more efficient. And a smaller number of cells usually means slower charging because lots of cells allows higher parallelism and reduced individual cell rates, and thus faster charging for a given cell spec.
@@barryrosolen5813 This video only talks about Wh/L (i.e volume). That smaller battery is not necessarily lighter (Wh/Kg) too (it could weight just the same, or even more), but obviously materials are such that it is likely to be lighter too, and yes if it is then you get more range per Wh (at least on the flat/uphill).
100% correct. If they were somehow better at dissipating heat so you could charge multiple packs in parallel at higher current, then they would better. But exactly like you said, they wouldn't achieve that with less cells (maybe less batteries per cell).
@@Wookey. Yeah, I hate it when they talk about these things in terms of range instead of energy. It's already starting people off with ignorance. "So if I turn the heat on, I lose like, 15 miles per hour the heat's on right?" "How come our electric bill is in kWh and not miles?" "The car said I could drive 100 miles, but I was doing 90mph on the highway, and the battery was dead when I only drove 60?" Oi.
@@dstr1 While what you said is technically correct, it is misleading. Voltage is voltage, but it's power that we really worry about, which is voltage times current. High voltage with low current can be quite harmless. If someone were to make a 9V battery that output 100Amps (unlikely of course) that would produce 900 watts of power.
@@stevewebber707 Sorry but what you've said is actually more misleading. There is no such thing as high voltage with low current, as the voltage drops immediately. This is why the current is low, because the voltage has dropped -- think of Ohm's law, if the voltage did not drop then the current would be high. A 9V battery capable of 100 A output would taste the same as a conventional 9V battery as D Strachan said -- I've licked many :) This is because the resistance of your tongue is not low enough to draw significant current at 9V. Of course a 9V battery is not considered high or dangerous voltage, but any power source capable of high current can cause you big problems if shorted. If you short out a 9V battery capable of 100 A you risk fire or severe burns because of the heating produced. If you short out a conventional 9V battery the voltage drops near zero immediately and not that much current flows, so you're safe.
Don't forget that Samsung was also the construction company responsible for the construction of the Burj Khalifa and the Petronas Towers. They are also the 2nd-largest ship builder in the world by revenue and have many hotels and golf resorts around Korea. AND they have an automotive business, insurance business, credit card business, and even dabble in the medical industry having at least 1 hospital. It's absolutely absurd how many different things they do and seemingly nobody knows about any of it outside of their Phones and TVs.
"Hey I explained the history of batteries and the context of the breakthrough, how Samsung's solid state battery works and the problems they have solved, and finally suggested how they might progress to cheaper elements going forward but we're still waaaay under 10 minutes... I'll just have a still soundless screen thanking my patrons for a couple of minutes at the end" I like this guy.
It is worth noting that the current prototype, which they already have, is 50% better than the current batteries. Ignoring any further advancements, this is a huge advancement and could even be used right now (potentially). The "5 years away" bit where the nickle-cobalt is removed from the mix is just another further advancement. The cost of batteries with respect to their energy density will no doubt be improved from this advancement alone, but the further advancements would only make this much much more pronounced.
@@Popeslash No way, my friend. For solar you need the sun shining, same problem with wind. Hydro is only possible at a few places on earth and has massive impact at the environment. So has geothermal and it can't provide enough energy over a long time. And if you think about it, all your solutions got their energy from the sun and it's fusion of hydrogen. So why going this indirect way instead of using fusion in the first way. Plus, all your solutions are bound to earth. What about traveling to space. There's no wind or rivers. And solar collectors get to big to sustain bigger space ships. Fusion is the best an most elegant way for energy supply we know. That's why the universe uses it in the greatest powerplants exists, the stars.
isn't 'solid state' essentially devoid of mechanical moving parts? Aren't *all* batteries solid state? Don't they *all* use breakthrough technology? Just to clarify the first four words of the title there.
jose almeida when one charge gets you 1000 miles, 1000 charges get you one million miles. And the the battery can be removed from the car and the rest of the capacity is enough to power a house during the non-sun hours.
Same. I've read a ton of things about supposed amazing battery technologies for years, yet almost none of that actually made it into the market. Well, someone did release a power bank with some graphene in it and performance was impressive. So... I suppose that material actually has a chance. Still, until we see at least one these new technologies applied in consumer phones and/or cars, I'm not going to jump the gun just yet.
@@thenonexistinghero inventing the technology isnt necessarily the hard part, I wouldnt be surprised if they could make a battery that was 3x the performance tomorrow. The hard part is actually producing it at a reasonable cost. I'd trust samsung to know this and be working towards it, but so many smaller people will think they have a breakthrough but really it was probably something thought of and thrown away when it was realised production wouldnt be possible
@@APerson-xg6cu because unless you want everything plugged into a wall, including your car while you're trying to drive it, you're going to want an efficient place to store and release that power.
He said lithium requires an oxygen free environment. The research labs handle lithium foils in a normal atmosphere but it has zero humidity. The water molecules are what cause the oxidation. Musk said that once the batteries are over 400W/l they can be used to power airplanes. I wonder why it has to be measured by watts per volume, not weight. If you have a high powered battery but it's heavy like lead-acid, it could be low volume but have too much weight and it wouldn't be practical.
One big problem with your comparison of gasoline vs LI battery. You should compare by energy /mass (not energy/ liter) which is the ultimate constraint on a car or a truck. Comparing energy per mass, gasoline (33KWH/ 6 pound) totally blows any battery out of the ball park.
120 years ago there was electric cars and taxis in New York and check jay Leno´s garage channel for his baker electric car. Reducing the number of cells may in fact increase the charge time as each cell only can absorb so many C and the fast charge of today is achieved by spreading the charge among the 7000-8000 cells used.
Do we though? Wouldn't a mix of technologies and a smart grid, that can transfer and balance power across large areas, fulfill most of our current energy needs? I don't think we can wait for a significant technological breakthrough to solve today's problems.
Iterative advancement is the only thing you can do, because, by definition, you cannot predict the "gotcha" moment of genius that opens up a new level of use.
Baleur its an interesting question whether there will be a big gotcha moment or just a series of smaller ones. There’s graphene technology which despite slow progress might be that gotcha revolution once/if mass production on an industrial scale is achieved. Fingers crossed.
4 года назад+40
If i had a dollar for every "breakthrough" i've heard about new batteries in the past 10 years...
I remember getting excited years ago when I saw an article about a new type of battery that would double phone battery life. Now I want some real life applications before I get hyped.
I understand heat engines are limited by carnot’s theorum. But wouldn’t assuming batteries can reach their 100% theoretical efficiency just as ridiculous?
If they don´t need to be in an oxygen free environment couldn´t you just cut or break off a part of it and still have a functioning battery? If so it would be extremely convenient for battery production where they manufacture large plates of solid state batteries which are then cut into the required sizes. This is especially good news for people who build moterized models because often there is very little space for batteries which results in a shorter running time. On top of that there is no flammable battery acid anymore so those new batteries could be charged and dischrged at much higher speeds which opens the doors for even more powerful small electric devices, be it rc cars, planes or phones and smart watches. I look forward to the day they are released and used everywhere because then electric cars would be more environmently friendly than gasoline powered cars, current lithium batteries are very difficult to recycle and release a lot of bad things into the environmet when recycled and even when produced
"reasonable prices" and precious metal electrodes don't tend to mix ....maybe thats why we have no fuel cell vehicles on the market? (And without detailed info i wouldn't buy into the "silver batteries will save us", especially when silver costs 5 times as much as the dreaded expensive cobalt)
@@martonlerant5672 when gar cars came out it was also only for the rich, same with computers, same with phones. Electric and hybrid cars have come a long way already and will continue to become more accessible to a larger group of people
@@martonlerant5672 Im a little late to the party but id also like to point out that its not just the cost of the matterial but how much of it. If there is five times less of the five times more expenssive matterial then it comes out to the same cost.
If it ends up being a decent chunk, the price of silver might dramatically increase, at least until recycling can bring it back to more of a closed loop system.
I doubt it is going to require a lot of silver. Remember that almost every electronic device in your home has gold coated electronic contacts. I believe that the silver needed in these batteries will be a very little amount.
ok, the volumetric energy density is 900 Wh/L what about gravimetric energy density and the power desities? for an ev it isn't very helpful to have lot of capacity, but only being capable of delivering little current while being heavier the batteries need to have the right balance of properties for every appication
To make his (John Goodenough) name even more hilarious, his middle name is "Bannister" which effectively causes his name to often being shorted down to "John B. Goodenough" And please research the fella, he totally lives up to his name as he has both worked on developing the first Lithium-ion batteries, RAM for computers and is now working on the next gen batteries. I'm new here, but I what the feel about Redox-Flow batteries are here?
As I understand it, the main down-side of Redox Flow batteries is that they have a very low energy density for their weight, which tends to make them impractical even with the convenience of being able to quickly replace the electrolyte in order to recharge them.
No, he meant solid state (which of courses still uses lithium). Both classic lithium ion and solid state suffer from dendrites, but due to the solid state one being... solid those dendrites can cause the battery to break apart faster. A classic lithium ion battery can handle this better as the liquid electrolyte allows more expansion.
Jakob Schulze Actualy a lithium-ion battery does not form dendrites since it has an intercalation based graphite anode. Only lithium metal batteries suffer from dendrites. All solid state batterie are one approach to mitigate dendrite formation in lithium metal batteries (lithium metal has a 20 times higher specific capacity than graphite)
@@PR-hl9pm Are you sure about that? I think both lithium ion batteries and lithium metal batteries do. Although I could be wrong about that. Or maybe newer lithium ion batteries don't suffer from dendrites.
Meh, 2 years and the technology is nowhere to be seen, plus is not that big of a deal anyway...I was expecting much more, going from 600W/L to 900W/L is nothing that mind blowing, it will cost more also...
Well I’ll believe it when I see it it seems like every year there’s always videos proposing solid state batteries coming out. It will be awesome tho when we eventually make to switch for all devices
skaterfugater Yeah, they never want to talk about power to weight figures or the fact that batteries don’t like doing work. There’s been plenty of journalists that have done towing tests with the model X and every time they pull anything (even a light uhaul trailer) they always lose OVER half the range efficiency immediately. That’s why hybrids are where it’s at.
An interesting new way, but what about the Lithium-oxygen batteries that was studied in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago? Which one represent the future of the batteries?
@EricMalbos I was wondering the same..I guess that, since researchers at UIC developed metal air batteries they are dependent on oxygen and causes flammability issue with lithium anode...on the other hand this one by samsung completely eliminates the flammability case and makes them safer for future applications...
Lots of problems with this approach. Biggest one, you have to pump air into the battery, while filtering it and while removing all water (and avoiding condensation)...
@@UltimateAlgorithm It would have to be fusion, not fission. Our only use for fission is as a glorified steam engine, as its too slow for anything else. Evas need to be able to move, and move quickly. The only good a nuclear reactor would do is as a trickle charger for a rapid-drain battery.
Its normal for most phones, even if the backcover could be screwed off. It's to make phones more durable and compact. You can heat the glue a bit and switch the battery. Replacing the glue is a good idea when switching the battery or any glued covers or screens. It can all be done at home, and for beginners internet is full of instructions for basic maintenace.
RUclips is being kind to you. I didn't know about the existence of this channel neither had i watched any video similar to this one and still RUclips gave me a notification of this video. And why not. Your video is amazing. I subbed.
Ive seen someone mentioned something about cathodes, that graphene can't be used because it lacks this type of electrode, from what I know, its positive charges moving in a direction
This is great news! We have an electric sailboat with lead acid batteries. We have sailed across the Atlantic so far but would love to upgrade the batteries to give us more range ⛵️
I consider myself to be of slightly above average intelligence. I knew about the build up of dendrites when alternating between the charge and discharge cycle.. But then the rest of it. No. I think I might have to re-watch a few times, and to try not to look like Homer Simpson when he is getting the dental plan speech. ^_____^
We keep hearing these "new breakthroughs in battery technology" and yet none of them have been used in a smartphone. I mean, the only thing that's holding back our phones are batteries. They only last around 4-5 years when afterwards they either have no capacity left or have bulged or even exploded. And they are not even easily replaceable like they were back in 2014. Hopefully, they will be available in a few years, because I don't really see a reason to buy a practically disposable phone.
@@johnmyviews3761 i think there w/l might be wrong. My current ebike battery is around 1.5 liters, and is 1kwh, so its 750wh/l. IDK how 900wh/l is a big improvement
I've been hearing of new batteries coming zoom for more than 5 years now. When are they coming to market? I can't see another video for a battery unless it's already on the market.
@@francoischarbonneau9447 Hehehe. Tesla will need another 2-3 years to get their product pricing low enough to justify the switch. Solid state, maybe 5+ but at a significant cost (on a sedan car already costing 60k!). By then, revolutionary combustion engines like Mazda Skyactiv X will be achieving better than hybrid efficiency while keep emmision (N0x) levels to ridiculously low levels. And that's aside the competition in the electric market and the lower low fuel prices.
New and improved batteries are literally hitting the market everyday. I owned a 2012 Chevrolet Volt and back then they used an NMC333 battery chemistry that cost about $400/KWh to produce. My Wife's 2018 Bolt EV now uses a much more energy dense battery with an NMC622 Cathode that cost about $145/KWh to produce. The 2020 Bolt EV has already moved on to NMC712 which is another 10% more energy dense and costs closer to $100/KWh. And the new GMC Hummer will be using NMCA89 cathodes which are much more energy dense yet again and should cost closer to $90/KWh to produce. Plus GM showed a solid state battery cell which appears to be pushing towards production for the next generation of EV's in the mid-2020's.
with good solar tech, one sunny day s power will last one month s use. quick absorption, dense reserve. the power grid will evolve into management. a big part of the pollution is going to go away!
From a marketing point of view, these are very well-done videos. My score: Graphics=10: Content=10; Music=10; Video Sign-off tagline=10; VoiceOver=9. The voiceover was well delivered, but at times was heading toward “robotic,” but never got there. Loved the sigh and pause after you mentioned that very long battery name description. LoL. Keep up the good work!
Never put all your eggs in one basket. Graphene promises great improvements, but there is no telling how long it will take to make those advancements, or to produce graphene cheaply and in high enough quality.
I know Samsung has a robust graphene R&D programs in collaboration with academic institutions. I actually met a few researchers working with Samsung on that a couple of years ago. It will take a while to figured out an economical way to produce the material in an industrial scale. But the show must go on.
The most important part is missing though: What happens when the batteries are dead? How does the recycling work? Is the higher capacity worth the mashed up elements, which I assume are hard to recycle. Traditional batteries have lower capacity but they can be recycled easily with relatively low cost.
Recycling Li-Ion batteries is a known technology and not a difficult process, and it can be profitable assuming you have a ready supply of spent batteries.
If this thing can go through over 1000 cycles, we have more than enough time to figure that out or we have more than enough energy from Nuclear Fusion when it's time.
At one point I started to pretend I understand what you are talking about.
Can you plug a cable into a passenger aircraft and expect it to fly the whole way? No you beed batteries. If the batteries too heavy relative to the amount of energy stored in it. It is not economical to build an aircraft. Larger capacity batteries means more economical airplanes
@@ariesmarsexpress Not so. High-speed trains use a LOT of power all the time. Aircraft use most when they take off, then much less at cruise.
I concur.
Dendrites are micro hairs that formminsode of a lithium iron battery causing a short. From being deeply discharged. Past the rated 25 % minimum capacity left.
Of it makes you feel. Better I suck at math.
When I was 6 years old, in 1974, my parents bought me a battery powered motorcycle. It had a lead acid battery in it, the bike itself weighed a lot and it took 24 hours to charge. That charge got me about 10 minutes worth of ride time. The battery failed after roughly 25-35 charge cycles and after that, it was a very heavy push toy. I remember the replacement battery costing nearly as much as the bike itself and my parents never replaced it. And now we have real cars that will charge in a few hours and drive hundreds of miles. I find this all to be amazing
My grandmother had an ALL electric riding lawn mower with a 42" cut that worked wonders. Well enough that it should still be around. However that company disappeared. This was back in the 70's.
But still the promises are too far fetched.
I remember reading science magazine in 2012 and they promised us the batteries what we see in this video (up to 1000mw per liter) in about 5 years time. After 5 years, in 2017, i checked the battery technology news and everything was pretty much as before, no changes and the promising technology was all in the near future. Now, 3 years later, as this video shows, we still have no promised batteries and all the technology is still in process.
electric ars are just the same, an expensive toy
@@allgoo1990
We dont have solid state batteries in a real mass production and i believe it is because currently working SSB require some very expensive and very rare materials like silver, so it is impossible to produce these batteries in a massive scale and will it be even possible to develope a solid state battery which could be mass produced to the point that it would be in our phones and cars is still questionable.
@Rightious Aggitator LOL, funny you say that, I went searching to see if I could find that some one for a retro fit, but my wife reminded me I'm a 53 yo man 😪😂🤣
Imagine your name is John Goodenough, and you're more than good enough.
John Supergoodenough?
His peers would have hammered him😆
Nah, the bar of Goodenough is just far too high for the wast majority of us.
Better yet, his full name is John B. Goodenough (John be good enough)
Imagine your name is Yong Gun Lee.
"It's not about being perfect. It's about being sufficiently good." - John Goodenough
why do you write being as beign?
@@andrewdirrell7497 Because english is not my first language and I always get those confused. Just like americans confuse "you're" with "your". Thanks for pointing that out. I'll fix it!
Then came Charles Alittlebetter
InspirationalAF
Even when the people in your life constantly &pathologically drain you of all your energy for selfish &self-serving reasons.
Just be happy they give you enough time for you to recharge. Before doing it again.
- John Goodenough
Also invented by John B Goodenough, as was Ram memory too.
Fair enough
Oh
Yes, he definitely be good enough. :)
And he did get an Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
so his name was "goodenough" lol i smell CIA inqtell SAIC bullshit where they just leak out alien tech slowly
>Hold on to your lunches
Sorry, I'm already holding my papers.
I see what you did there :)
better put your hand on the lunch box that is sitting on the papers
Two minutes later... 🙂
my thoughts exactly when I heard him say that lol
damn they sound same
"but these batteries weren't powerful enough to do anything with it"
1909 baker electric car with 160 miles of range: am I a joke to you?
EDIT:
Wow, great to see so many reactions! :) I want to clarify a little bit. My point was mainly that batteries have always been on the verge of being 'good enough', with how you package/use them being the main limiting factor. Just because it didn't work out practically for commuter cars or long haul trucks doesn't mean there weren't plenty of vehicles that could have easily been partially or fully electrified, from post office vans to city buses etc. For some reason many people have this mentality of 'all or nothing'.
People compare energy density of batteries and gasoline as if this is the only thing that changes between vehicle designs, no AC inverters, cooling systems, electric motor, piston motor, clutch, gearbox and transmission shaft...
Isn't it weird how opinionated people can get about which technology to use? As if it is a personal matter. I saw some lay people the other day arguing online about which technology should be used for self-driving cars, lidar or cameras. Their argument got so heated, even though they didn't have any stake in the adoption of either of these technologies. They also didn't have any hard statistical data to base any of their arguments on. It was purely based on the feeling each technology gave them. Strange psychology at work.
Anyway, thanks for all the replies, it was very interesting to read. Cheers
free spirit 1 , that car in “1909 baker electric” won’t pass today’s safety standard.
Well i don't think many vehicles from ~1900 is secure out of the box by today standard
Electric car preceded the thermal engine ones. Even then people pushed electric out of the way to be able to sell their waste product from oil refining. Had this push not be done the 150 years of evolution in electric battery would have been waaayyy shorter, we'd have way less efficient thermal engines for sure but also way better batteries.
As for those talking about safety standard, thermal engines in the 1900s weren't safe by any means either.
@@Penofhell I wouldn't want to start one by hand crank. I wonder how many arms were lost to that endeavor.
John Hue if gas engines weren’t created, we would be so far behind, it’s not even funny. We were no where near viable electric power, while gas was something that was able to be innovated quickly. If we didn’t go to gas, it would have taken cars DECADES longer to get to where we got, using gas power . All because you want your utopia of electric cars? People like you don’t want to admit, just how much of the modern world you enjoy today, exists because of the internal combustion engines. Electric didn’t even come close.
the animations are amazing as always
Do you know what he is using, which programs?
@@jodom5613 Blender
Yap, blender with real time rendering engine (Evee)
and you don't think it os pr material from samsumg?
It'll be great if Samsung succeeds with this. Yeh cheaper and longer lasting phone charges maybe even new products, technologies and maybe hook up with Hyundai Motors on their future Autonomous vehicles. Hook them up with solar panels, wind turbines (both onshore and offshore), and other green energies.
It seems like every year for the last 20 years I've seen an article or a news report about a 'revolutionary new battery technology'... And not once has anything actually come of it. We've had tiny incremental tweaks to lithium ion; and that's it.
As others here have said, I'll believe it when I see it.
It's like fusion power: It always seems to be a few years in the future... then you get to the future, and it's STILL a few years away.
The fusion thing is because they're trying to get investors. So they underestimate on purpose.
@@DrLazerbeam "....15 years ago have made no discernable difference today..."
The only way for all the cancer research to "have made no discernible difference" is for you to willfully ignore the outcomes. Mortality rates have fallen a great deal among a number of types of cancer, even within the last 10 years.
Thyroid, breast, prostate, and testicular cancers tend all now have 5-year mortality rates of about 1%. Most melanoma along with Hodkin's and cervical cancers are below 10% mortality in the standard 5 year window.
People still die of course, we all do in the end, and some cancers continue to be quite lethal but outlooks have really improved across the board and patients going into remission long enough for cancer not to be a factor in their lifespan is a very real thing, now.
@@lthundertree6385 yes but I'm specifically referring to "these miracle discoveries that scientist think will cure cancer" I'm fully aware that any cure or medicine for cancer will not apply to all cancers so the task is astronomical.
@@DrLazerbeam Scientists don't make those claims; clickbaity media do, because exaggeration sells.
@@DrLazerbeam Bruh he was just pointing out the truth, scientific researchers usually word their research carefully to seem sensational to the scientific community but are usually still pretty technical, scientific articles and media articles are the ones that sensationalize news to get clicks.
It is an exciting time to work on energy storage technology. I'm working on my PhD on Materials used for Energy Storage. I hope to cover content like this one day :) Thanks for sharing!
What are your thoughts on supercapacitors?
This was 2 years ago, any breakthroughs? Would be nice to fit an extremely weight and powerful battery in my electric skateboard and have 1000's of km's of range hehe.
yes, battery capacity, capacity storage for reserve, and possibly an alternator type capacitor
John Goodenough, i always giggle when i hear about him
Yeah, that name is sooooooooooooo hillarious. Uggh.
@@gregkinney2565The name is simply goodenough :)
then you find out his middle initial is B and rofl. my physics professor always said the secret to STEM success is to just "be goodenough"
Dude got a Nobel, so maybe, just maybe he's Goodenough
I hear he has a distant familial connection to Boris Badenuff...:-)
Conclusion: Some kind of new battery will change the world.
James Muecke but we live a globalized world with way more scientists and educated people. Not only that, their are multi billion dollar companies and governments working on this.
James Muecke Honestly, technology is going to be exponential rather than linear. Our mobile devices are amazing computers but those batteries are junk. Once we get to replace our lithium ion technology, I expect beefier and juicier ram, cpu, and gpu in our smartphones. Its going to change everything.....20 hour screen time and 4 day battery life.
However, a lot of jobs will be lost.
And probably, like a lot of inventions, it will be discovered by accident. LOL Examples: rubber tyres because testers' boiling pot caught fire and he threw it out the window. Kicked the 'lump' on his way back from getting food and found it was solid. (now tyres are all synthetic made from oil) Example 2: Transistor. Auto electrician fixing early model battery charging fault, leaned on the rectifier circuit and noticed his meter reading changed (his hand was on the negative lead and his other hand was touching the middle of the rectifier (clunky large diode). He investigated it and produced the Transfer Resistor Ta Da "Transistor". Example 3: Stainless Steel: At a steel plant, the failed mixes were dumped on to a growing pile at the back of a factory. Smokers, on a coffee break, noticed weeks later that on layer was not rusting. Piqued management went through the records (after counting the failed layers) and reproduced the alloy mix. Refined it with further trials.
@@hellotheir1427 yeah but chemistry and the laws of physics are a bitch.
okleydokley It is a bitch. Whoever can stop this achilles heel, that company or person could be the first trillionaire.
“Cured the disease by killing the patient”
😂😂
That's how North-Korea is dealing with their pandemic right now. :]
@@MrBrander North Korea found a cure ! Its called lead
Thats the most efficient way actualy.
Regrettably it's still the case, improper remedies are administered as a cure, for lack of definitive knowledge and widespread acceptance of such improper medications.
@@vbrotherita How is a lead bullet an improper remedy against Covid? It can cure even a diarrhea!
"I say it's good enough" - John Goodenough
To make his name even more hilarious, his middle name is "Bannister" which effectively causes his name to often being shorted down to "John B. Goodenough"
Edit: Research the guy, he totally lives up to his name as he has both worked on developing the first Lithium-ion batteries, RAM for computers and is now working on the next gen batteries.
1:25 i swear i thought you were going to say hold on to your papers. i've been watching Karolyi too much
3:06 Decreasing the number of batteries does _not_ make them charge faster. Higher energy density just means they take up less space - you still need to put the same amount of electrical energy in - the vehicle/motor haven't got any more efficient. And a smaller number of cells usually means slower charging because lots of cells allows higher parallelism and reduced individual cell rates, and thus faster charging for a given cell spec.
Would less batteries mean less weigh and longer ranges.
@@barryrosolen5813 This video only talks about Wh/L (i.e volume). That smaller battery is not necessarily lighter (Wh/Kg) too (it could weight just the same, or even more), but obviously materials are such that it is likely to be lighter too, and yes if it is then you get more range per Wh (at least on the flat/uphill).
100% correct. If they were somehow better at dissipating heat so you could charge multiple packs in parallel at higher current, then they would better. But exactly like you said, they wouldn't achieve that with less cells (maybe less batteries per cell).
@@Wookey. Yeah, I hate it when they talk about these things in terms of range instead of energy. It's already starting people off with ignorance.
"So if I turn the heat on, I lose like, 15 miles per hour the heat's on right?"
"How come our electric bill is in kWh and not miles?"
"The car said I could drive 100 miles, but I was doing 90mph on the highway, and the battery was dead when I only drove 60?"
Oi.
😤BUT LESS BATTERY 2 CHARGE!!!😤
/s
Oh boy! I can't wait to lick a 9V version of this battery.
It won't be any different from the same voltage of any other battery. Voltage is voltage irrespective of how many amp hour
@@dstr1 While what you said is technically correct, it is misleading.
Voltage is voltage, but it's power that we really worry about, which is voltage times current.
High voltage with low current can be quite harmless.
If someone were to make a 9V battery that output 100Amps (unlikely of course) that would produce 900 watts of power.
@@stevewebber707 Sorry but what you've said is actually more misleading. There is no such thing as high voltage with low current, as the voltage drops immediately. This is why the current is low, because the voltage has dropped -- think of Ohm's law, if the voltage did not drop then the current would be high. A 9V battery capable of 100 A output would taste the same as a conventional 9V battery as D Strachan said -- I've licked many :) This is because the resistance of your tongue is not low enough to draw significant current at 9V. Of course a 9V battery is not considered high or dangerous voltage, but any power source capable of high current can cause you big problems if shorted. If you short out a 9V battery capable of 100 A you risk fire or severe burns because of the heating produced. If you short out a conventional 9V battery the voltage drops near zero immediately and not that much current flows, so you're safe.
:-)))))
100 people die from licking 9v battery every year
Samsung is such a broad company it's kinda insane. I think we will see premium phones with these batteries in the coming years.
Gotta love horizontal monopolies. Still not a bad as that jungle named one...
Don't forget that Samsung was also the construction company responsible for the construction of the Burj Khalifa and the Petronas Towers. They are also the 2nd-largest ship builder in the world by revenue and have many hotels and golf resorts around Korea. AND they have an automotive business, insurance business, credit card business, and even dabble in the medical industry having at least 1 hospital. It's absolutely absurd how many different things they do and seemingly nobody knows about any of it outside of their Phones and TVs.
@@dantreadwell7421 *Jeff Bezos wants to know your location*
@@blaziken1564 They had a militairy branch that developed tanks, helicopters and jets for the korean government. They sold it off in 2014 though
*laughs in GE*
"Hey I explained the history of batteries and the context of the breakthrough, how Samsung's solid state battery works and the problems they have solved, and finally suggested how they might progress to cheaper elements going forward but we're still waaaay under 10 minutes... I'll just have a still soundless screen thanking my patrons for a couple of minutes at the end"
I like this guy.
"It is never good enough" - John B. Goodenough
It will only be as good as it can get!
hhhhhh
Love the video! Great research and so much information!
So I take it the:
Fusion reactors: 30 years away
Next gen battery: 5 years away
...still applies then :D
I heard fusion was 15 years away.... 15 years ago. Sooo anytime soon!
It is worth noting that the current prototype, which they already have, is 50% better than the current batteries. Ignoring any further advancements, this is a huge advancement and could even be used right now (potentially). The "5 years away" bit where the nickle-cobalt is removed from the mix is just another further advancement. The cost of batteries with respect to their energy density will no doubt be improved from this advancement alone, but the further advancements would only make this much much more pronounced.
Usually the bottlenecks/no-goes are cost of materials, and the lack of production methods on an industrial scale
@@DmitryLapshukov the problem with fusion reactors is that they are always 5 years away from the day.
Pace77 prototype to market may well take 5 years
Now just add Molten salt reactors to charge them - Elysium's is my favorite design.
No molten salt....
Fusion reactors are the answer.
Check out General Fusion
There's absolutely no need for that when you can use hydro, geothermal, wind and solar.
@@Popeslash No way, my friend. For solar you need the sun shining, same problem with wind. Hydro is only possible at a few places on earth and has massive impact at the environment. So has geothermal and it can't provide enough energy over a long time.
And if you think about it, all your solutions got their energy from the sun and it's fusion of hydrogen. So why going this indirect way instead of using fusion in the first way. Plus, all your solutions are bound to earth. What about traveling to space. There's no wind or rivers. And solar collectors get to big to sustain bigger space ships.
Fusion is the best an most elegant way for energy supply we know. That's why the universe uses it in the greatest powerplants exists, the stars.
@@osi1neu Agreed, fusion reactors are the answer... in 2075
@@osi1neu The Sun is shining
Wait wait wait, Samsung’s Research Department’s slogan is, “because we can.”? Like Aperture Science?
Lol .. speaking Aperture Science.. the outro in this video ..
We're done here 😆
8:31
Samsung be YOLO.
oh no
isn't 'solid state' essentially devoid of mechanical moving parts? Aren't *all* batteries solid state? Don't they *all* use breakthrough technology? Just to clarify the first four words of the title there.
The next 20 years of technology will be very interesting
The future 20 years from now will be totally different, mark my words
Bruh look at the last 20 years. We went from radios and crt tv to lcd/led becoming common in every household.
The next 5 years will blow your mind! Major things coming very soon!
@@martiddy Yes, because of the economic downfall.
@@prateekkarn9277 Maybe vr will be common in every household soon. Who knows.
I will believe it when it is available on the open market
1000 cycles are very little.
jose almeida when one charge gets you 1000 miles, 1000 charges get you one million miles. And the the battery can be removed from the car and the rest of the capacity is enough to power a house during the non-sun hours.
Same. I've read a ton of things about supposed amazing battery technologies for years, yet almost none of that actually made it into the market. Well, someone did release a power bank with some graphene in it and performance was impressive. So... I suppose that material actually has a chance. Still, until we see at least one these new technologies applied in consumer phones and/or cars, I'm not going to jump the gun just yet.
thenonexistinghero Graphene batteries. Next vid in the cue.
@@thenonexistinghero inventing the technology isnt necessarily the hard part, I wouldnt be surprised if they could make a battery that was 3x the performance tomorrow. The hard part is actually producing it at a reasonable cost. I'd trust samsung to know this and be working towards it, but so many smaller people will think they have a breakthrough but really it was probably something thought of and thrown away when it was realised production wouldnt be possible
I look forward to seeing these in products in... 20-30 years.
Gotta milk the public.
I’m 18 at the moment, so when I’m around 40-50 I’ll get the 3000 mile range Tesla Model Z
Why bother they'll have fusion reactors then. :P
@@Keeamsmarr Oh yes. At the ripe age of dying from the instant acceleration.
@@APerson-xg6cu because unless you want everything plugged into a wall, including your car while you're trying to drive it, you're going to want an efficient place to store and release that power.
He said lithium requires an oxygen free environment. The research labs handle lithium foils in a normal atmosphere but it has zero humidity. The water molecules are what cause the oxidation.
Musk said that once the batteries are over 400W/l they can be used to power airplanes.
I wonder why it has to be measured by watts per volume, not weight. If you have a high powered battery but it's heavy like lead-acid, it could be low volume but have too much weight and it wouldn't be practical.
John be good enough is legend
He has multiple innovation to his name just search the net
04:11 Young Gun Lee, John Goodenough damn those battery people have crazy names :)
Yeah, sounds like a new addition to the MCU
Well, if you look at the name Young Gun Lee and consider the fact that it's a Korean name, it isn't all that crazy...
His name is Lee Yong Gahn
"Young Gun Lee" sounds like an action movie star :)
@@devilsoffspring5519 Sounds like the Jackie Chans assistent :)
I could watch this just to see how satisfying is: “Hello everyone Subject Zero here.”
I like his ending when he says "Alright folks that's it we are done here"
@@visheshsharma93 that line reminds me of Cave of Johnson from portal2
Vishesh Sharma same here 😂
Lithium is a waste of time,
Graphene is the future.
Barry G i agree man
Dude............Amazing channel, where have you been all my RUclips life! I had read about the nano helping with dendrites years ago, this is amazing.
This dude have an awesome name "Young Gun Lee"!! Damn!!
Yong gun lee, lol. Coolest name evar..
"Really interesting topic" I thought, just before my eyes glazed over.
My right hand has seen some serious action in its lifetime but never hugs and kisses😂
after ssd we give you ssb, cant wait for the nvme 2.0 battries XD
True, revolutionary dechargig speeds!
One big problem with your comparison of gasoline vs LI battery. You should compare by energy /mass (not energy/ liter) which is the ultimate constraint on a car or a truck. Comparing energy per mass, gasoline (33KWH/ 6 pound) totally blows any battery out of the ball park.
120 years ago there was electric cars and taxis in New York and check jay Leno´s garage channel for his baker electric car.
Reducing the number of cells may in fact increase the charge time as each cell only can absorb so many C and the fast charge of today is achieved by spreading the charge among the 7000-8000 cells used.
Alright folks, that's it. We're done here.
Dr. Hakim oh no we‘re just getting started
But what is the weight?
Who are you? An oil company?
Is this 900 Wh/kg energy density goodenough?
Now, what would John say?
Ok, we'll try to remove the cobalt.
The replies continue..... that's why we're NOT done here
Good iterative advancements.
But we still need that "gotcha" revolution in terms of energy generation/storage.
We're making progress, that's what counts, right?
I don't know, a few more large "iterative" innovations like this and we might be good.
Do we though? Wouldn't a mix of technologies and a smart grid, that can transfer and balance power across large areas, fulfill most of our current energy needs? I don't think we can wait for a significant technological breakthrough to solve today's problems.
Iterative advancement is the only thing you can do, because, by definition, you cannot predict the "gotcha" moment of genius that opens up a new level of use.
Baleur its an interesting question whether there will be a big gotcha moment or just a series of smaller ones. There’s graphene technology which despite slow progress might be that gotcha revolution once/if mass production on an industrial scale is achieved. Fingers crossed.
If i had a dollar for every "breakthrough" i've heard about new batteries in the past 10 years...
You'd have like $20 .. winner!😂🍻
That's called progress. Try to imagine where you'd be without it.
@@surfside75
...And if you invested that $20 in Tesla 10 years ago you'd have over $700.
I remember getting excited years ago when I saw an article about a new type of battery that would double phone battery life. Now I want some real life applications before I get hyped.
Im pretty sure those breakthroughs became realities. What point are you trying to make here?
I understand heat engines are limited by carnot’s theorum.
But wouldn’t assuming batteries can reach their 100% theoretical efficiency just as ridiculous?
If they don´t need to be in an oxygen free environment couldn´t you just cut or break off a part of it and still have a functioning battery?
If so it would be extremely convenient for battery production where they manufacture large plates of solid state batteries which are then cut into the required sizes. This is especially good news for people who build moterized models because often there is very little space for batteries which results in a shorter running time. On top of that there is no flammable battery acid anymore so those new batteries could be charged and dischrged at much higher speeds which opens the doors for even more powerful small electric devices, be it rc cars, planes or phones and smart watches.
I look forward to the day they are released and used everywhere because then electric cars would be more environmently friendly than gasoline powered cars, current lithium batteries are very difficult to recycle and release a lot of bad things into the environmet when recycled and even when produced
I'll get more enthused when it's on the market at a reasonable price!
"reasonable prices" and precious metal electrodes don't tend to mix
....maybe thats why we have no fuel cell vehicles on the market?
(And without detailed info i wouldn't buy into the "silver batteries will save us", especially when silver costs 5 times as much as the dreaded expensive cobalt)
@@martonlerant5672 when gar cars came out it was also only for the rich, same with computers, same with phones.
Electric and hybrid cars have come a long way already and will continue to become more accessible to a larger group of people
@@martonlerant5672 Im a little late to the party but id also like to point out that its not just the cost of the matterial but how much of it. If there is five times less of the five times more expenssive matterial then it comes out to the same cost.
Question is how much silver would be used per unit or ton?
If it ends up being a decent chunk, the price of silver might dramatically increase, at least until recycling can bring it back to more of a closed loop system.
I doubt it is going to require a lot of silver. Remember that almost every electronic device in your home has gold coated electronic contacts. I believe that the silver needed in these batteries will be a very little amount.
We don't know, but it was described as a 'nano layer' of silver-carbon, implying that it was very thin.
ok, the volumetric energy density is 900 Wh/L
what about gravimetric energy density and the power desities?
for an ev it isn't very helpful to have lot of capacity, but only being capable of delivering little current while being heavier
the batteries need to have the right balance of properties for every appication
I suspect these characteristics are not so impressive, otherwise the authors would have enthusiastically mentioned them in the abstract.
Probably better for stationary application.
It's remain a mystery to me why i watch a video even though I don't know what the hell it is
A better battery
To make his (John Goodenough) name even more hilarious, his middle name is "Bannister" which effectively causes his name to often being shorted down to "John B. Goodenough"
And please research the fella, he totally lives up to his name as he has both worked on developing the first Lithium-ion batteries, RAM for computers and is now working on the next gen batteries.
I'm new here, but I what the feel about Redox-Flow batteries are here?
As I understand it, the main down-side of Redox Flow batteries is that they have a very low energy density for their weight, which tends to make them impractical even with the convenience of being able to quickly replace the electrolyte in order to recharge them.
I am skeptical about it. solid state batteries are like fusion energy, just instead of always being 30 years away the are always 3 years away.
Totally different set of circumstances.
I'll get more enthused when it's on the market at a reasonable price!
A battery that lasts 10 times as long will cost at least 10 times as much I bet.
Im just happy it exists. Its like saying anti-matter exists and someone says " So ? Cant use it. Who cares ? "
Yeah, there's a ton of these, and they all sound great but if it can't be manufactured easily it will never see the light of day
Solid state batteries can do everything except leaving the lab.
Dont worry well hear about it again in 10 years
3:11 to 3:30
Did you mean "Lithium ion batteries" there?
No, he meant solid state (which of courses still uses lithium).
Both classic lithium ion and solid state suffer from dendrites, but due to the solid state one being... solid those dendrites can cause the battery to break apart faster.
A classic lithium ion battery can handle this better as the liquid electrolyte allows more expansion.
Jakob Schulze Actualy a lithium-ion battery does not form dendrites since it has an intercalation based graphite anode. Only lithium metal batteries suffer from dendrites. All solid state batterie are one approach to mitigate dendrite formation in lithium metal batteries (lithium metal has a 20 times higher specific capacity than graphite)
@@PR-hl9pm Are you sure about that? I think both lithium ion batteries and lithium metal batteries do. Although I could be wrong about that.
Or maybe newer lithium ion batteries don't suffer from dendrites.
End battery suffering. PETB!
Samsung Now:NICE BATTERIES
Samsung Then:BATTERIES GO BOOM 💥
Meh, 2 years and the technology is nowhere to be seen, plus is not that big of a deal anyway...I was expecting much more, going from 600W/L to 900W/L is nothing that mind blowing, it will cost more also...
Well I’ll believe it when I see it it seems like every year there’s always videos proposing solid state batteries coming out. It will be awesome tho when we eventually make to switch for all devices
It will take a very long time most likely
2:25
you forgot to take into consideration the weight differences of the electric motor to cumbustion engine plus gearbox.
yeah but the weight of battery, inverter and cooling systems more than make up for that, compared to the petrol tank's size and weight
Supercharged Petrolhead no they don’t. A Model S weighs almost as much as a light truck.
skaterfugater Yeah, they never want to talk about power to weight figures or the fact that batteries don’t like doing work. There’s been plenty of journalists that have done towing tests with the model X and every time they pull anything (even a light uhaul trailer) they always lose OVER half the range efficiency immediately. That’s why hybrids are where it’s at.
@@Sovereign86 Good thing electric cars are improving constantly.
Yeah, watts per liter is dwarfed by watts per kg, since roads aren't flat, and we accelerate and decelerate.
An interesting new way, but what about the Lithium-oxygen batteries that was studied in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago? Which one represent the future of the batteries?
@EricMalbos I was wondering the same..I guess that, since researchers at UIC developed metal air batteries they are dependent on oxygen and causes flammability issue with lithium anode...on the other hand this one by samsung completely eliminates the flammability case and makes them safer for future applications...
Lots of problems with this approach.
Biggest one, you have to pump air into the battery, while filtering it and while removing all water (and avoiding condensation)...
IBM kinda stopped development of there lithium air battery "project 500".
The cheaper one, obviously
@@OmkarBhatkar @apauwelyn1 Thank you, it makes sense, I understand now.
I watched this without sound and I had a confused stroke
I'm looking forward to see if Goodenough's glass electrolyte solid state battery tech works out.
John Goodenough has a middle name starting with a "B" which makes it even better: John B. Goodenough
Solid state batteries have been around the corner for over a decade now
So were on about the same track as with lithium batteries?
I love the animations in your videos. They are a great inspiration.
What about John good enough new battery? I heard it was something to do with layers of glass? What's going on with that technology?
I saw a science article about recharging these batteries add a thin film of plastic and the bounds allowed unlimited charge cycles
So basically, an unplugged Evangelion can last more than 5mins now
Why don't they use nuclear power instead?
@@UltimateAlgorithm It would have to be fusion, not fission. Our only use for fission is as a glorified steam engine, as its too slow for anything else.
Evas need to be able to move, and move quickly. The only good a nuclear reactor would do is as a trickle charger for a rapid-drain battery.
but future shinji will still be using a dtape.
Why does Samsung glue the batteries in their phones?
Changing a battery is basic maintenance.
Profit but you prolly already know that
So you buy a new phone every 2 years
I think you know the answer to that.
Its normal for most phones, even if the backcover could be screwed off. It's to make phones more durable and compact. You can heat the glue a bit and switch the battery. Replacing the glue is a good idea when switching the battery or any glued covers or screens. It can all be done at home, and for beginners internet is full of instructions for basic maintenace.
Would you like having a phone that rattles? Also it is not hard to unstick the battery.
Damn I barely have had knowledge on batteries before the video. I think you r are quite good at breaking stuff down, nice! (:
You should watch more of his vids. Him and Everyday Astronaut do great videos. Subject Zero is my favorite as I have to prepare myself for each video
Revolutionary Battery Built by Samsung???
Does anybody remember the Note 7?
Imagine u carrying a micro thorium reactor suitcase which you could plug to your car , or house....
RUclips is being kind to you. I didn't know about the existence of this channel neither had i watched any video similar to this one and still RUclips gave me a notification of this video. And why not. Your video is amazing. I subbed.
You're wrong
4:23 sussy steel
I thought the solid state Batteries will be made of Graphene
Ive seen someone mentioned something about cathodes, that graphene can't be used because it lacks this type of electrode, from what I know, its positive charges moving in a direction
This is great news! We have an electric sailboat with lead acid batteries. We have sailed across the Atlantic so far but would love to upgrade the batteries to give us more range ⛵️
wouldn't bet on rhese coming to market any time soon
And phone manufacturers will probably reduce the size of the battery just so they can ensure the customer can't get a whole day of usage out of it
I consider myself to be of slightly above average intelligence.
I knew about the build up of dendrites when alternating between the charge and discharge cycle..
But then the rest of it.
No.
I think I might have to re-watch a few times, and to try not to look like Homer Simpson when he is getting the dental plan speech.
^_____^
4:34
... sus
Cool, this means that this technology will be useful in 20 years when the artificial scarcity rights expire.
Why wouldn't Samsung want to manufacture and sell these, if they can be economically competitive with existing batteries?
It's probably gonna take like 2 years at most for these and graphene to be standardized.
I don't know, I think Samsung would probably do something with this. They make a lot of stuff.
I'm not even 3 min in and I'm not only commenting but have shared it to a fellow, likely, appreciator; very well done. Subscibed.
Leaving a comment because this is the best youtube channel!!
I didn't know I was supposed to watch this during lunch! Also 9,3% of us would require hugs and kisses for our left hand...
But people will want 1000 hp and 1000 miles range. NO gains lol.
I have a lithium ion battery which is used in a big car remote control car but it didn't last long because I was made in china.
We keep hearing these "new breakthroughs in battery technology" and yet none of them have been used in a smartphone. I mean, the only thing that's holding back our phones are batteries. They only last around 4-5 years when afterwards they either have no capacity left or have bulged or even exploded. And they are not even easily replaceable like they were back in 2014. Hopefully, they will be available in a few years, because I don't really see a reason to buy a practically disposable phone.
They dont want you to keep your phone they want repeat customers.
I wish they had give the Wh/kg.
A quick search on battery energy density indicates an appropriate equivalent of w/l to w/kg
1liter = 1kg
zoltan87 With water, yes, but it doesn't hold true for everything. For example, 1L of lead is going to weight a lot more than 1Kg.
@@johnmyviews3761 i think there w/l might be wrong. My current ebike battery is around 1.5 liters, and is 1kwh, so its 750wh/l. IDK how 900wh/l is a big improvement
Me: hits play with enthusiasm and curiosity
My brain: laughs in dumbness
I did not like the presentation, rank it as very poor! Sorry.
ASSBS are the most exciting thing of the 21st century 😮
I've been hearing of new batteries coming zoom for more than 5 years now. When are they coming to market? I can't see another video for a battery unless it's already on the market.
Mid May according to Elon.
You confuse "coming to market" with "research if it even works"
@@francoischarbonneau9447 Hehehe. Tesla will need another 2-3 years to get their product pricing low enough to justify the switch. Solid state, maybe 5+ but at a significant cost (on a sedan car already costing 60k!). By then, revolutionary combustion engines like Mazda Skyactiv X will be achieving better than hybrid efficiency while keep emmision (N0x) levels to ridiculously low levels. And that's aside the competition in the electric market and the lower low fuel prices.
Exactly im tired of seeing how this crap "might work"
Unless their coming to market quit wasting my time with stupid shit videos
i want my money back
New and improved batteries are literally hitting the market everyday. I owned a 2012 Chevrolet Volt and back then they used an NMC333 battery chemistry that cost about $400/KWh to produce. My Wife's 2018 Bolt EV now uses a much more energy dense battery with an NMC622 Cathode that cost about $145/KWh to produce. The 2020 Bolt EV has already moved on to NMC712 which is another 10% more energy dense and costs closer to $100/KWh. And the new GMC Hummer will be using NMCA89 cathodes which are much more energy dense yet again and should cost closer to $90/KWh to produce. Plus GM showed a solid state battery cell which appears to be pushing towards production for the next generation of EV's in the mid-2020's.
“Hold on to your lunches”
Good thing I didn’t eat yet today
Yea!!! SKYNET!! 😳 Closer everyday😏.....
No But Really Thanks, that does sounds really cool. The implications (if used wisely) Are endless!!
with good solar tech, one sunny day s power will last one month s use.
quick absorption, dense reserve.
the power grid will evolve into management.
a big part of the pollution is going to go away!
From a marketing point of view, these are very well-done videos. My score: Graphics=10: Content=10; Music=10; Video Sign-off tagline=10; VoiceOver=9.
The voiceover was well delivered, but at times was heading toward “robotic,” but never got there. Loved the sigh and pause after you mentioned that very long battery name description. LoL. Keep up the good work!
"How they achieved this is fascinating..." *ad shows up*
Damn you're a pro RUclipsr 😆
Which is at that point I turn off
Samsung already giving up on graphene?
leftcoaster67 probably went top secret falling under military application 🤷♂️
high quality Graphene is still expensive for mass production...i guess this research finds an alternate route..
Never put all your eggs in one basket. Graphene promises great improvements, but there is no telling how long it will take to make those advancements, or to produce graphene cheaply and in high enough quality.
Graphene was soooo 2019.
I know Samsung has a robust graphene R&D programs in collaboration with academic institutions. I actually met a few researchers working with Samsung on that a couple of years ago. It will take a while to figured out an economical way to produce the material in an industrial scale. But the show must go on.
Imagine Mr Goodenough is not satisfied with his Work
*WHEN GOODENOUGH IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH*
1 year later. What happened?
I think a nuclear powered future is better though...
This sounds like the announcement of carbon nanotubes.
This could go nowhere
Carbon nanotubes do stuff. But this isnt the industrial revolution, new thingss are hard to inplement.
The most important part is missing though: What happens when the batteries are dead? How does the recycling work? Is the higher capacity worth the mashed up elements, which I assume are hard to recycle. Traditional batteries have lower capacity but they can be recycled easily with relatively low cost.
Actually, solid-state batteries are surprisingly easy to recycle (assuming you found a way to kill the battery)
Recycling Li-Ion batteries is a known technology and not a difficult process, and it can be profitable assuming you have a ready supply of spent batteries.
Even reusing cells to lower grade application such as bus batteries as renewable/emergency storage is a thing :)
If this thing can go through over 1000 cycles, we have more than enough time to figure that out or we have more than enough energy from Nuclear Fusion when it's time.