Amber Heard's HUGE MISTAKE Edited out of Interview by NBC!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июн 2022
- Sing Andy's petition: @PopcornedPlanet
www.change.org/p/save-lisa-si...
More videos:
Interview Part 1 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 2 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 3 • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Watch my UK #johnnydepp trial analysis
Amber Heard INTERVIEW REACTION PART 1:
• UK Barrister REACTION ...
JUROR SPEAKS OUT: REACTION:
• JUROR TELLS ALL! Amber...
UK Trial ANalysis:
PART 1:
• Video
Part 2:
• Depp v Heard UK Judgme...
PART 3
• INCIDENT 9 - "THE STAI...
Petition:
www.change.org/JusticeForJohn...
#JohnnyDepp Playlist:
• Johnny Depp v Amber He...
Also me: ruclips.net/user/blackbeltsecrets?...
My wife's cooking: ruclips.net/user/easychinesecookin...
Address for PAID Formal Advice ONLY: clerks@ShenSmith.com
Disclaimer: Neither this nor any other video, may be taken as legal advice. I accept no liability whatever for any reliance placed upon it, as there is no contract between us and I am not instructed by you.
For formal advice, please contact clerks@ShenSmith.com.
💌 Become a channel member to access stripes and perks!
/ @blackbeltbarrister
MY CAMERA GEAR
🎥 Big Camera amzn.to/3tW8nPU
🎥 Small Camera amzn.to/2RB7ez9
🎙 RODE VIDEOMic Pro+ amzn.to/2QCJURi
Gobe ND Filter amzn.to/2R3eEuA
Neewer Ring Light amzn.to/3aOkLtT
Switch Pod amzn.to/3sZb8yA
JOBY Tripod amzn.to/3dXJYDT
External Media Drive amzn.to/3uxNDOQ 🎓 Brilliant contract law book:
amzn.to/2PHC2O1 🎓 Excellent book with an overview of criminal law:
amzn.to/3gTPEAV 🎓 Learn more about trespass and tort law:
amzn.to/32N6TLS
(Affiliate link)
LAW FAQS
• Common Law
CONSUMER LAW PLAYLIST:
• Consumer Law
TREE LAW PLAYLIST:
• Tree Law Miniseries
ROAD TRAFFIC LAW PLAYLIST:
• Road Traffic Law
FAMILY LAW PLAYLIST:
• Family Law
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein.
#blackbeltbarrister #lawvlogs
Description contains affiliate links; I will occasionally earn commissions from qualifying purchases or leads generated.
This is why having a live broadcast of the trial was so important. Imagine getting coverage by the media? After carefully editing everything they find damaging to their agenda.
Before the internet that had gone on for years or probably decades.
@@robslade2571 We know they have been doing this for decades. They did it with police shootings when Trump was president. They do it everytime a minority is responsible for a mass shooting. They destroy anyone who doesnt follow the left-wing agenda.
Nobody would of known she left a poo in JD's bed.
100% agreed, the sad part about this edit is that while it does make her and her team seem like scummy people trying to hide their mistakes, we can not be 100% certain that the final cut wasn't the original cut and that the short preview wasn't spliced together to be click bait/ view bait by making her dumpster fire look like even more of a dumpster fire. We can not be 100% certain wither it was her trying to cover her tracks or wither it was the TV station just trying to get more views by having a click/view baity ad.
Wow! So true. Thank God BBB is jolly on the spot here and can so easily clarify what went down in that part of the interview. I just couldn't figure out what this woman was talking about, esp. her bringing Savannah in into it. Thanks so much BBB. Can't wait for your next one.🤗
The final interview was EXTREMELY edited! This is why we needed the trial cameras because they would have manipulated the information like they have ALWAYS DONE! 💯🏴☠️
Allowing the cameras in court was the best thing that ever happened to allow people to form their own opinions about this case without having to see through some spin or agenda.
What were the other edits?
Only the people filming who were present for the interview will know what, if any (ha!) other edits have been done.
Exactly!! We would’ve never seen the truth you nailed it
@@lynnerose7891 If you watch the other clips they released...the two 9min clips and the 20min on Peacock you will see what they edited out of the final interview...no telling what they edited that was shown. This particular edit that BBBarrister pointed out is the MAJOR one but some of the others were that crazy💩she did at the beginning...looking down...slowly looking up...deep breath then answering. They edited out a few parts that I noticed & I need to rewatch them again to see what else. Thank goodness people documented it so that we can see all the clips and compare them to the final edit. That is why I’m glad they had cameras in the courtroom! It has showcased how the media will BLATANTLY lie to support the narrative they want to express. Hope you and yours have a blessed one Lynne...I like your profile pic too💯🙏🏴☠️
You know, it's quite astonishing that she still didn't cry - even in this interview. Wow. Instead, she came across as angry and hostile.
I think the main reason the "full interview" answer was different is simple: news media outlets overwhelmingly side with Amber on this matter. They're still stuck in the, dare I say, "boomer" mindset of "man is always the abusive one, woman always the abused." Amber may not have public support but these media outlets will constantly try to make her look good, even if it means resorting to dishonest tactics.
Nothing to do with the boomer mindset actually. It's to do with the agenda they've been pushing over the last decade which is not even remotely a boomer agenda.
You mean the feminist mindset.
Its the whole "#me too bullshit" that's so prominent in Hollywood. Its news, its a story, the can't get over the fact they were so wrong. They tried to tear JD a new one and also lost
That is not a boomer mindset - this identity bullshit allows a few vocal boomers to be considered a representative sample - often by people with an agenda.
Disgraceful piece of editing. Everything about this woman is dishonest.
It is funny how NBC seemed to have the right to show the slip during the weak, while Amber apparently had power to get it removed in final cut. It is still an embarrassing "explanation", and she has an "explanation" for everything, but this takes the cake. She claims she was LYING when confessing privately, but telling the TRUTH now when she has an incentive to cover up her own crimes. Hmmmm...
I think you're correct that Amber is dishonest but this particular piece of editing I think proves the dishonesty of NBC.
@@maryannanderson2213 I was just about to comment the same about NbC
This is why no one trusts the mainstream media anymore. They do things like this. Then they moan about internet journalists doing better than them. Try to turn it into a money thing when they are I it for money. People watch internet journalists because they are more HONEST AND TRANSPARENT. MSM are killing themselves.
Funny how the truth comes out.
This case has opened my eyes on how horrible the media is. Can't trust 99% of them.
At least youve realised now, think about the rest of the population that still trust the media.
👍😖
People in media are probably narcissists
Same😱
Yes. If they're really trying to get you to love someone, or really trying to get you to hate someone, really dive into it. Don't watch their clips, don't rely on their framing. Try to find original, full material. It will often surprise you how much you've already been manipulated.
Imagine a news based show changing information to what they want the story to be and not the truth. I have given up watching any sort of news programs…too frustrating. Thank you for your content, you make it bearable to follow this monster of a woman
Its an agenda
Is there any oversight of journalism that this can be reported to? Like an ethics committee or some such ? This is blatant manipulation of an interview, not just editing, as has been pointed out.
This sort of thing is a big reason why I just can't trust mainstream media.
Let's be Honest We knew it
ruclips.net/video/26dg5crRTxI3/видео.html
As a DV survivor I feel infuriated by her she doesn’t know what it feels like to fear for her life it’s really triggering & I think if you ask 90% of Dv survivors across the world I think they would most certainly agree. Its insulting quite frankly it took me years before I could even tell my own mother about it & even now I’m ashamed to share all the details.🤬
Me too! She's fn liar! Broken nose my ass!
Sorry to hear.
I do truly believe Johnny depp winning and sharing his story has helped all DV survivors 🙏
Hope you're in a much better place now. Peace
As a survivor myself I completely agree. It's infuriating. It makes me so mad. She is trying to be an advocate and she will never be mine. I agree she doesn't know what it is like living that fear.im so glad you got out of it.
You have no shame. Shame on the abuser.
I am at a loss to understand how, after pretty much losing a defamation case hands down in which JD was not even named, she can go on TV and outright defame him all over again stating he abused her. Surely she is just asking to be sued again. The whole interview comes across scripted and rehearsed and disingenuous
She actually said in the trial: "I never saw myself as a victim"! These are her own words- under oath! So yeah.. she has a loathing of victims obvs
She thinks it's below her to see herself as a victim! Even though her whole assertion is that she is- by default of her assertions of being abused by JD! She is loathsome!
My ex, whom I believe to have borderline, was the same. She was in all kinds of arguments, but it was never she that instigated it, according to her. When I told her that she was using the victimhood for sympathy she became angry. She was no victim.
The big question isn’t “why did they edit…” the real question is: what else did they edit from that “full” interview or others?
As someone who used to be my brother's punching bag for many years well into my adulthood, I instantly recognised the language in her speech as negotiating language. Yes, Amber was truthful in her interview when she said that she was "negotiating" with Johnny. However, she was "negotiating" as the aggressor. Let me explain using my own experience of my brother. He often downplayed and still downplays his violence with almost the same exact words, "I only hit you like this, not like that. Come on, don't be such a baby. Besides YOU kicked my glasses / whatever (in response to my self-defensive actions against him)". I often held my tongue to avoid another punch or kick. The times when I was too angry and hurt, I would invariably reply him with versions of, "I kicked your glasses/whatever because YOU were kicking and punching me! I wish I hurt you even more than that so that you know what it's like to be punched and kicked by you." As the person who received the punches, I NEVER ever used phrases like "I only hit you, I did not punch you. Don't be a baby." Because I never was in the position of "negotiating" with my brother. My brother "negotiated" with me to placate and stop me escalating those incidents to figures of authority, like my parents, guardians, doctor, police, etc. Just thought to let you know an insight from the perspective of a recipient of violence, that only an abuser would "negotiate" the way Amber did in that voice recording. Hope this helps.
Excellent - though really saddening - insight into “negotiation” with the agenda of distracting the victim. So sorry for your younger self; so glad you’ve blossomed in awareness and wisdom! Thank you for your comment.
Thanks for sharing your insight. As a survivor it is great to read something and instantly recognise those feelings and corresponding actions explained perfectly in emotional but forthright, and passionate words.
Thanks for sharing.
Correct this is what all aggressive manipulative people do, It's your fault that I hit you etc etc. She is vile beyond words
If NBC are trying to rehabilitate her image why release both versions of the interview? She looked really bad in the original and it's all over the internet, and pretty much anyone with an interest in this has already seen it. This just makes NBC look equally ridiculous for trying to repackage it into something more palatable.
I’m so glad you covered this. The evening of the interview I reached out to a couple of people who have been covering the case to let them know. One didn’t respond, the other did and already knew about the edit. But neither did anything with it. I just thought that people would be as upset about this as I was. I didn’t really see anyone talk about it before you, other than a couple of comments on twitter. No one with any reach was talking about, I should say. That’s the reason I wanted to pass that information along, because I knew I could only spread it so far myself. People should be upset about this. Why can’t the media allow us to form our own opinions instead of manipulating us into sharing theirs? Why are they protecting her? If she were a man, we all know they wouldn’t be covering her lies.
This is nain reason why Johnny wanted his trial live! This is what i thought the whole time. All those people saying it was bad, distasteful and attention seeking of him. This clearly shows my thoughts all along. Johnny and his legal team were smarter and knew this
Yes!! Everything he said on the stand..was corroborated by the recordings..even the time when he was trying to explain their arguments..he said..." It was never ending..It was a circular thing that went on and on" that's why he would lock himself up on the bathroom..only to hear this lunatic ..knock..n knock on the door!!!! Or the time he left...and there she is sending him..20 to 30 texts asking for him to answer her..to comeback??? She says I feared for my life...I was afraid of the Monster!! So why are you calling him????? Makes no sense.
If this was seamlessly edited by the NBC, that opens up another question as well. Remember in Morgan Tremaines testimony about TMZ, he said that they had a journalistic practice of inserting a split second of a white screen in places where edits took place, to inform the viewer. That in effect, means that TMZ has a higher journalistic integrity than NBC when it comes to edits.
yup, the tjmax footage had the white flash!
I can guarantee that this interview has jump-cuts everywhere
Amber's attorneys had final say on the editing.
It's so pathetic to see her trying "so hard" to save her public image...
this is why AH's attorneys fought like hell to NOT have the trial televised..
I remember the first interview pre-edit. Don’t know why NBC thinks we’re dumb.
They do their best to brainwash people into turning their brains off, give them a chance! /S
Why are the media not accepting that she is guilty and was found to be a liar and guilty in court? Why are they still wanting to rubbish JDs name when he was found to be telling the truth and innocent?
Peace
If amber wants to lie on the national stage some more then let her do it. She's just digging her own grave. She's already destroyed her career. No studio is going to touch her after this.
So Dateline is trying to portray AH as the victim and not the abuser?!?! I'm glad their ratings soured!
They should release the unedited interview to show they're not trying to hide her lies...right now, it makes them look even worse than they did before
I am convinced a producer in charge of the teasers put in the unedited response purposely 🤣 And I’m grateful to that person. This lie of a “full interview” supposedly airing in its entirety on Dateline was anything but… It is just so devious on the part of NBC to edit any of her answers to dress it up to help her image. She’s a liar, an abuser and a manipulator, let her out herself - don’t cover for her. This is why people don’t trust the MSM, they have themselves to blame 🤷🏻♀️
This is the beginning of the end for MSM, this trial showed people how insane their lying can be and how badly they try to bend the truth.
*Corporate press! Don't give them legitimacy they don't deserve. Nothing is mainstream about their content.
They probably were "contacted " by amber's lawyers
as long as you also don't trust Fox
MSM should not be believed on any political subject. Maybe they can be expected to give the correct sports results, but they lie and lie and lie on a range of issues. Here in UK I don't watch TV or read newspapers- so much brainwashing.
She said: "You take the blame for things you shouldn't take the blame for"
not "for things you didn't do"
So basically her only worry isn't her actions, but her fall.
Very good catch! She “shouldn’t take the blame” when Johnny “drove her to it”.
Very similar to her saying "shouting fire in a theater" comment is against freedom of speech. It's not against freedom of speech if it's true!! She is mad because people aren't buying her bs.
Very perceptive! I got stuck in the "when your life is at risk" portion of what she said. When your life is at risk, you are afraid of the person who you believe might kill you. Well, we all heard the audiotapes: Victims do not relentlessly belittle, mock, gaslight and talk over their abuser in a deliberate attempt to provoke a physical fight. It's the other way around. She was never afraid of JD. Not even a little bit. She even admitted to that (albeit unwittingly) in the cross examination with Camille, when she literally questioned WHY she would be afraid of angering him. If she had been a victim who felt that her life was at risk, she wouldn't have had to question why she would worry about angering her potential killer. What she consistently calls "her truth" is what she wants it to be at any given time, and so all over the place, full of contradictions and sheer nonsense that she's demanding the impossible when she wants people to believe her. The jury's job was to find THE truth based on the facts and evidence available. Of course she thinks that is deeply unfair. She's a narcissist on steroids, so "her truth" is the only "truth" that should matter to other people.
@@Kari.F. Along with "why would I be afraid of him?", she also said on the stand was "I never called myself a victim". Really?? Why are we here then Amber??
I think Camille was did a great job by triggering her true narcissistic side by asking her seemingly unrealted questions like "did Johnny get you that role?" "Oh you didn't hear me?" . Amber got mad and kept spilling the REAL truth.
@@Kari.F. I agree of course, and you can add to it his habit of *hiding from her* in the bathroom whenever she got unhinged!!
Typical media package for us. Thanks for showing
The question is Why is NBC doing this? What does NBC has to gain by this deception?
I am so disappointed that NBC changed her response. Main stream media is on its way out
really sleazy move
I think everyone needs to get on the website for the Show or NBC and register a complaint. That editing was totally creating a lie. We've all had enough of the lies.
Liberals edit their contents everyday.
@@changsterville Tsch! You trumplicans say the most ridiculous things, lol!
I agree, it’s taking us viewers to be fools and it’s disingenuous.
So are we doing it or what?...
@@motionoftheocean7524 Yes!
Thanks all the way from Australia!!! 🇦🇺 I subscribed since watching you in LawTube and Popcorned Planet. Thanks for the great content.
"You don't have the resources that say *you and I do"* is what's missing..
Makes you wonder if any interview we watch with Celebs are *unedited and complete,* cause we'll never know.
She needs to be prosecuted for her lies. She almost destroyed someone’s life, reputation and earning capacity. I am disgusted this poxy station edited this to such a degree as to help cover up her lies. But it would appear there are still people protecting her. She needs to be charged at the very least.
Although I believe that Mrs Guthrie wanted those pieces to come out ,of the truth. I don't side with these people normally because I have seen for years how they play the narrative of the corporations. I think some of these edits, 1 show how the stories are manipulated by editing, as YT channels have stated.
2 to show how editing can make a person appear like the movie producer has said about the movie magic
3 I think they saw what all these YT content and social media comments read the interview and tweeked it to their benefit.
Can you imagine how screwed up this interview would have been if social media hadn't pinpointed all of these flaws in the interview?
There is criminal charges possible there alone never mind the trial...
She belongs behind bars.
Everyone seems to be terrified of AH and seem to be doing her bidding, no matter what. She's been given too much power to control the world around her. Time to call her bluff and stop her pity party and lies that she's spreading to further her own agenda.
completely agree with you. kowtowing to her or to her narrative just makes companies and individuals supporting her lies look greedy, corrupt, ignorant and at best foolish. there's so much evidence out there now that she has lied and proof she has received illgotten fame and fortune on the backs of true DV and SV survivors.
all the times she was caught out lying in court on camera to the jurors, does that nor count as perjury?
This forensic dissection is just outstanding & confirmed my understanding of the case. I hope that AH gets charged with PURGERY!
She was flustered with that question and cobbled together a response based on material she’d studied about DV victims but forgot or didn’t know how to properly paraphrase it to fit a first-person narrative. I’m not sure if that’s enough for perjury. It’s definitely enough for an injunction based on what I’ve read and heard from lawyers. I thought there were things she said in trial that were blatant lies and audio to disprove. Like when she admits to JD why she made abuse allegations against him, because Laura Wassar told her to or she and her friends would be kicked out of the penthouses (untrue). She’s admitting it was all, in fact, a hoax, and that demands letter the lawyer Spector wrote was extortion. To me this shows intent to fabricate abuse allegations unless she’s given her demands. Her demands were not met so off to the courthouse with a fake bruise, TMZ, a TRO, etc. It’s so frustrating to me that her lying about donations holds more weight.
The lying about the donations is much more clear cut. So much easier to prove. I do not think it is being given more weight but simply it sets the base line when it comes to her ability to lie.
I think her statement about repeating/believing her claims to her dying day alone is enough to warrant an injunction if Depp sees fit to request one.
WRT the weird answer, I think it's Heard once again letting her grandiosity get in the way of a clear and concise answer. I think the very simple idea she's trying to express is that she didn't see things clearly at the time due to abuse. Easy. Instead she gives this longwinded rambling word-salad answer where she ends up confusing herself and accidentally putting herself in a different category from DV survivors.
I agree that the jury and the people covering the trial seemed to place far more weight on comparatively tangential issues compared to claims and testimony that were pertinent to the DV. I think the reason so much was made of the donation lies is that there is no way to weasel around the fact that she did not pay of dime. With most of the other claims the truth of the matter isn't quite so absolute.
To me her lying about her donations means a lot. If she can flat out tell all of Britain (and potentially the world) that she had already donated the money, then it’s basically a given that anything she said after I would regard with the utmost suspicion. And since she also lied on the stand, changed her story, fabricated/altered evidence, I would not believe anything she said.
@@pennycandyys I understand that. But that lie came *after* she told JD that she lied about the abuse allegations and gave her reasons why she lied.
She said I believe right before that she was just lending her voice to the movement too so all of it together definitely shows it's all bullshit.
Totally dishonest......how is she getting away with it
Great catch! She is absolutely saying "unlike us non-victims"!! Good Job!
Thank you for discussing this. I saw the original and was wondering why no one noticed that she's talking about in third person. And when I saw the final interview, I was in shock that they edited it out. Disgraceful
It's possible the NBC "edit" was due to Heard's attorney input. However, that said, For Amber Heard, she already let the "proverbial cat out of the bag !!!" Thank you for your video's.
I don't get the "attorney input" argument. The uncut version of that clip has been published. What can be legally saved by releasing a censored version afterwards? Nothing, AFAIC. They would have to have a way to pull down the previous version. Good luck with that, as it has been reacted to on zillion of RUclips channels.
@@coolcat23 Your point is well taken, however, something/someone changed the Producers and /NBC/MSNBC corporate minds to edit. This would not be the First Time NBC has edited facts already public. By the way, we (you and I) agree :For Amber Heard, she already let the "proverbial cat out of the bag !!!
NBC is a big provider of "fake news". They aren't going to let the facts get in the way of them promoting their narrative.
I kinda doubt that. NBC is known to be extremely biased to the left, and at this point the only people supporting her at the fringe left that still believe the mantra of "believe all women".
Yes, from my understanding, her attorneys had final say and wanted that part edited out of the Friday night hour-long special.
Factually the " interview" was edited ( it is a TV show no evidence) at the end she was pay a significant amount for doing the show and she was given editorial control. Anyway this show has been a supreme fiasco from her
Agreed. She walked into trap after trap.
Not certain she would have been given editorial control otherwise taking away nonsense like Johnny Depp made people believe he had scissors for fingers the interview would have last about 5 minutes
They saw exactly how badly it played as a preview, and changed it.
They just keep digging that hole deeperand deeper. Wow. Just so sad.
It goes against everything I remember learning during my journalism degree. It's completely unethical to alter a quote in such a way where the meaning is changed. You can cut a quote to fit time constraints, etc, but you should NEVER alter the meaning/original message of the quote/statement. It's utterly shameful, yet predictable of MSM.
The left have taken over entertainment and the Media, but they can't control youtube... yet...
". . . everything I remember learning during my journalism degree." ?
@@brianbetz7030 yes you can major in journalism lol so it's a journalism degree
And they won't be able to argue that it was due to time constraints because it was only 2-3 seconds of footage
@@maypasifiki9360 Yep! Especially when they advertised it as being the "full" interview as well. There shouldn't be time constraints when airing a "full" interview like this.
There’s also a question about the network’s dishonesty for editing out the damaging comments. Although we already know about how skewed mainstream media is, I think that needs to be addressed as well.
Her attorneys/PR team had final say on editing.
Lying in court should be taken serious action,it's becoming a trend and am a victim of false claims
I totally agree. I noticed exactly the same. Thanks for highlighting it so people can really see what's happening with traditional media.
I noticed the awkwardness of the first statement because she’s stating that she and Savanna would have more resources than average victims and yet she’s complaining of her more resources trial was unfair. Nonsensical.
I believe what happened was like a Freudian slip. She accidentally said something true. It's because subconsciously she doesn't identify with "those women" that lip curl is absolutely contempt. Its all over her face in that moment. She sees women who stay in these relationships as weak. And she is not weak. It was a moments lapse. She identifies with women like Savannah. The resources she spoke of are her super common sense, strength, financial ability to take care of herself. Of course all just my opinion but when I heard that slip It felt like a physical kick in my stomach as I'm sure most survivors.
excately
Yes, this point is truly monumental. She believes she is above others....
Amber, can't have a normal conversation too many words mean the same thing for her. Abused and abuser used synonymously.
And MSM wonder why their ratings are tanking. Advertisers take note.
Thank you so much for this video. As I was watching the interview, it just felt ‘off’ so to speak. I’d love to see the uncut/unedited version. No wonder folks are tired of main stream media. Again, thank you for all that you do!
Her sister's boyfriend ex boyfriend just came out with a statement saying that her sister told him straight up that Amber is the one who merely knocked her down the stairs these people lied their asses off in court and should go to prison
They won’t prosecute her for perjury! She fits the bill with what this country allows people to lie and stay out of jail. If you get my drift!!
💯
I get ur drift...*sighs loudly* I just wish ur comment wasnt so spot on.🤦♥
Exactly - we HAVE to take our Country back!
Look, if Martha Stewart was unfairly accused and jailed because of perjury, so can AH, regardless of she looks.
thank you to point this out! There's another part that was completely cut, when she said that "she was pushed to a limit that she didn't know what was right and what was wrong", erased! Her PR and legal team are trying to do damage control on an interview that was MEANT to serve as damage control, lol.
Amber herself doesn't know the difference between right and wrong. She blames Johnny for what she does. True borderline and narcissistic functioning.
Throw in histrionic and she's out there on national TV making everyone see what a turd she is.
They should have never had her do this interview. It only solidified that the verdict was the right one and Amber is dishonest
I don't think i can ever believe any of these media outlets anymore at all.
Came over because of Andy’s recommendation. So glad I did. Love you.
I used to work as a videotape editor, I was editing a piece for sports news channel and the director wanted me to use a response to a different question to reverse the answer given. He was not happy when I refused. This happens a LOT in broadcast TV.
You would of though after her disasterous performance during trial, she would stay off TV and keep her mouth shut.
I honestly don't think she can. She can't admit - even to herself - that she lied, or that the jury or others, didn't believe her. She can't imagine that she's lost.
Looks like she relied on the performance to be saved in the cutting room, just like with her movies.
@@paulaseabee8442 she really is delusional and needs help then, although that was clear from the trial to be honest so it shouldn't be a surprise.
@@coolcat23 she must insane then if she thinks the media will do that every time, if she carries on she'll soon make an even bigger blunder and they will expose her, at least she doesn't have to be worried about being sued again, but there's always prison to worry about.
Shes attention starved. I just feel bad for the child in her home.
Great catch! At this point, I don't expect anything different from her or from the media...
Splendid stuff Sir. Well spotted. Blessings ever from Belfast.
Definitely she wasn’t suffering these abuse, it’s her facial expression the way she communicates her story her body language all of these elements combined is what gives her away, I am pretty sure her videos will be used for educational purposes.
Let's be Honest We knew it
ruclips.net/video/26dg5crRTxI/видео.html
and the lack of any concrete evidence!
Educational on how NOT to lie, and how liars tend to spin so many stories in their lies, they end up contradicting themselves and forgetting half of the manure they have spewed.
What told me that she wasn't suffering the abuse she claimed is when she told Savannah Guthrie that the trial was "the most horrible and humiliating thing she ever experienced". So, the trial was worse to suffer through than the years of abuse?
Facial expressions and body language are what struck me first, overacting to try to emphasise her story.
I think we should circulate a petition for NBC to present the full uncut interview.
I just hope he DOES NOT waive the $8.35M. 🇦🇺
Excellent find! Anytime you see edits like this which are kind of subtle indeed the whole meaning shifts.
I really shouldn’t be surprised and disappointed because I am losing my confidence with mainstream media but I am. Thanks for highlighting this!
My confidence left years ago. Do not trust MSM for anything accurate. Fake News is a BIG problem - along with 'unequal justice under the law.'
No surprise to me- MSM lie and lie and lie and then say certain honest commentators on social media are lying. Black is white, up is down in their disgusting world, they serve the crooked rich and corporations, big pharma, the military industrial complex
Makes you wonder what else has been _"Edited"_ out.
Right?
Absolutely MSM doing what they always do. NBC is caught red handed. I honestly quit watching MSM over 15 years ago. They absolutely edited it to support AH and or their agenda. You can’t even start to quantify all MSM has and continues to do. They frame it, and edit it before we actually get to see the truth as it is. Great job my friend! Your videos are fact based and heavily researched. Glad I subscribed when I did. I don’t miss your down loads. Keep up the great work. We appreciate what you have done and continue to do. Let’s get that UK appeal done for JD!
Thank you! I always find your input helpful.
She's not been abused .She's probably been looking up online real victim story's to use as her own like what she did with her staff member
what story did she borrow from another person?
@@alwaysdisputin9930 Her old assistant Kate James said that she herself was raped before, and that Amber stole that story and spun it as her own
@@Uthor123 additionally the threat of microwaving babies came from the Wagatha Christie case back in 2020 where that made the rounds at the time.
Everything she says sounds like she read other people's accounts and Facebook articles on DV. Some of it has even been verbatim what he Twitter supporters have said about DV. She *doesn't* take the blame for starting physical fights in the recording. She blames him. He tries to leave. A victim taking the blame out of fear or placating doesn't say " I started the physical fight" then follow it with " because you try to leave". " Because you try to leave" is placing blame, not accepting blame.
Let's be Honest We knew it
ruclips.net/video/26dg5crRTxI/видео.html
That’s what I said too.
She stole story from Rhiana btw
Exactly!! It is so painstakingly obvious from the recordings that she is the aggressor. She berates JD over and over again for leaving when they have an argument. She chases him down and forces him to engage with her in the argument. She flies into a rage and becomes physical if JD tries to leave in an attempt to stop him leaving. She is in no way scared of him, but it is obvious she is scared of him leaving. She feels abandoned when JD leaves to go to sit in the bathroom or go to one of his other houses to difuse the situation. That is the monster she is talking about, the man who leaves, because to AH , being abandoned is the most terrifying thing. She would become violent when he tried to leave and she had to completely destroy him when he wanted a divorce. Honestly it is quite insulting to our intelligence what she tries to twist the narrative to put herself in the victim role. She is using all the tricks in the book but we can all see through it.
@@ccf8093 Yes, she had ample opportunity in that recording to bring up his supposed abuse. She never did. Not once. She didn't say " i hit you because you scared me" or "because you hurt me" or " because you hit me first". She said " i hit you because you try to leave and I don't even know when I do it". In a private conversation SHE recorded to try and show HIS abuse, and she only talks about hers.
Perhaps that is why they put out sections of 'the interview' to guage public reaction, pick up on criticisms, or to decide if speech 'alterations' need to be made?
Only watched less half in lunch, but you do such a great job analyzing this topic. Ty.
Mel
She Must think we are all idiots. Can't unring the bell. Hundreds of thousands, if not million of people had already viewed the interviews previous days. And if there are perjury charges coming...all the better.
Main stream media is mostly on Heard's side. It's actually sickening to hear them talk about this case. They simply will not accept that their original knee jerk reaction of believing Heard was wrong. I don't think Savanna Guthrie was necessarily trying to make Heard look like the "real victim" but NBC and most other outlets are definitely trying to push the agenda that Heard was abused. I watched the NBC special and in between Guthrie's questions they were definitely pushing this agenda with all their short interjections.
Yeh males always gotta be bad, females always victims, along with other adgenda they have. Just imagine how much editing goes on it other interviews and statements that never comes to light.
I wonder what else msm may have lied about....
I agree about the mainstream media, (which I never had a problem with til now) - it's beyond frustrating. Savannah had to walk a fine line, which she did a pretty good job of, but she probably wasn't in charge of editing. From Savannah's expressions and body language, I don't think she believed Amber
Yes the media coverage has been disgusting, including the insinuating photos and excerpts within stories that no-so-subliminally paint Depp as an abuser even after a jury verdict and REAL "mountains of evidence" exonerated him!
I'd actually love to see what Savannah Guthrie would have put out if on-air talent had control of edits. She is clearly NOT a Heard fan, judging by her body language, and I think she was using the same technique Depp's lawyers used to help him win the defamation case: let the lying liar show how much she lies.
It is important to remember several things.
1. Savannah is a former DV lawyer. You can see by her expressions she doesn't buy what Amber is saying, and a lot of her questions were meant to show her contradictions.
2. She has no say over the final edits. NBC brass edits it, and once they finish thier edits, it is realeased. The interviewer can look it over, but they cannot change anything substantial.
3. NBC ran with the Johnny Depp story alongside Amber from day 1. Most likely they are trying to bury the story with this "final" interview (thus why the question of people having no sympathy for either side being totally unedited.
TLDR, NBC tried to save face, and it is backfiring horrible, but i doubt this was what Savannah's intended edits
She’s definitely done her research on what victims are supposed to feel but that little give away of distinguishing herself from them is a slip up that she has done her research and talking in the 3rd person.
I love your content!! I love the way you explain things!!
I subscribed to you after seeing you with Andy on Popcorned Planet!! You are great!!
Thanks! She also said during this clips « why would I have to give my money » or something in that effect when she’s saying not a gold digger & didn’t want anything ….that been also cut/ edited
It was obvious when she last took the stand that she was repeating what she’d read about sufferers of PTSD when she said that ‘her friends had a set of unwritten rules so as not to startle her’ (which was not consistent with how tactile she appeared to be with her legal team).
JD’s team objected and she stopped in full flow, as if a director had yelled ‘cut’. She waited for the judge’s response, which was to over rule the objection, then looked back at the jury and started back where she left off saying ‘unwritten rules’ and continuing with a list of things in what came across as lines from a script.
Totally agree. And she kept flip-flopping between claiming PTSD for the “abuse” and from statements made my Adam Waldman. Like if she was going to claim trauma from what her case is actually based on, it would have been more powerful for her to say “I have a set of established boundaries with my friends, partners, and coworkers to not mention the statements, media attention, etc. even in a joking way because I tend to shut down”
Exactly!
I remember that! 😳 I think you're right.
Very keen observation. Though I feel like people still on about this closed case are reaching a point where it's just tired... not to mention the fact that actually putting months into nosing around in and taking advantage of other peoples shit for personal gain isnt exactly Gods work either.. she might be a messed up individual but I dont wish what she's going through rn on anyone, or what JD has been through at her hands either.. there are people that dump babies in trash cans and serial rapists and child molesters if you really want to dissect something fucked up. For instance, She lied 1000000 times, other lady dumps a newborn kn a dumpster.. who's a worse human, where are those discussions at?
Unfortunately I don’t think they will charge her with perjury. Hollywood has proved time and again that there is one justice system for them and politicians and another justice system for the rest of us
yep!
Let's be Honest We knew it
ruclips.net/video/26dg5crRTxI/видео.html
Absolutely
It makes me wonder why tf do they even swear them in...if they know they can lie without ANY consequences, then they ALL will lie! Smfh...😬🤦
It's Virginia I believe, and there's many woke male judges there who would like to socket to a younger? successful JD type or any man for that matter; not to mention another female one with the same outlook on men and white men, in particular. JD was lucky to have a smart, no fools allowed, and very careful adult and balanced one this time. But, most importantly 5 men and 2 women on the final jury selection. I'm not sure but I think that was the reason Elaine was crying at the end of the day this jury was chosen?🙂
I think she will be prosecuted for perjury. There needs to be serious consequences for lying under oath. She has lied about so much.
And that's why I do not get my news from Mainstream.....liars liars!!!
Her lies are so obscene that she should change her name to Obscene.
Then we could say that Amber should be Obscene and not Heard.
Hehe
In my opinion, and I believe in everyone's opinion, the cut in the latest version is clearly misleading the public. One wonders what else has been cut out. Not sure why some media need to prove time and again that one cannot trust them to report the full story in an unbiased way.
Nice to find your channel. Came over from Popcorn Planet! Keep up the good work.
Perjury must be brought brought. The law is already under a massive cloud for a whole load of reasons. If they let consistent, repeated, lies be let to stand unpunished, what pressure is there on anyone to be honest under oath?
Some traditional news channels still operate in a old time way where they can edit everything and manipulate their audience’s thoughts and understanding of the truth. That’s why I am grateful to have found these RUclipsrs and LawTubers who operate their channels with integrity and tell the world what the real truths are.
I did not bother to watch the full interview, I figured something like this would happen. The media seem to be trying to help AH look better than she is. I'm glad for all your videos that explains the facts.
I didnt watch it either
You are right about this. This is a bad con job. I wonder if Amber had the rights to a final edit of the piece. Also, out of all the work that is being done post trial, I find this channel to be the best. BBB really knows his stuff!
More than dishonest, and just goes to show that the"press" is partly to blame for this whole mess. IE the sun.
The thing that angers me most about Amber Heard isn’t her lies on the stand or even the damage she did to Johnny Depp’s reputation and career. It’s the damage she’s done to all the victims of domestic abuse who will now have to fight even harder to be believed. Far from being a high profile ambassador for victims of domestic violence she’s ensured all evidence will be examined and questioned even more closely. She should be thoroughly ashamed of herself.
I really hate this argument. The jury looked at all the evidence in court and arrived at the conclusion that Johnny Depp was the victim and Amber Heard the abuser. All this case proves is that if you lie about abuse, you'll get caught out. How is that a loss for the women who are telling the truth??? And why would one court case call into question the credibility of all women?
Carolyn - as a man I agree totally with what you say. Real men despise dickheads cowards who abuse women. Amber Heard has given those scum a helping hand - and she could not care less. Remember ladies - the vast majority of men are chivalrous and love women - don't let this case of 'man-haters' keep us apart.
Evidence should always be examined closely. Can't be a good thing to have investigators and fact finders doing a bad job.
She never will be though will she, because narcissists are never in the wrong, at least in their own eyes.
AH's mind is so disturbed that she will do and say anything to back herself up, and she'll do it for as long as is necessary. She's creating a narrative, a type of living theatre if you will. The more she speaks, the deeper she'll ultimately get bogged down in it to the point that she'll be the most ridiculed person in existence. She's the instigator, the protagonist and her destructor. IMO she's a very dangerous person.
The more lies she tells, the easier it will be to catch her out her. The internet never forgets, but she will and every slip up makes her look more of an idiot! LOL
And she's a mother... YIKES!!!
I don’t even think she’s 100% a “person”. She’s one of those “celebrities” that I would actually believe did sell her soul to the Devil for fame….but there’s always a price. If you look into her history, when she was 16 she & her best friend had a major car accident & her friend died. She later stated that her friend’s death is what motivated her to pursue her acting career. She ran away to CA…and somehow became somewhat famous. It’s questionable at best….but what a bizarre f’d up kind of motivation that is!….killing your friend (manslaughter) in a car accident! 🤔🤦🏻♀️
Makes you wonder what else was cut that we never got to see.... ridiculous!
👏 wow awesome reporting,its getting to the point......who does one believe .
She didn’t sound like she was claiming it in a placatory way?
She said it was very aggressively!(tape)
So NBC had edited this interview to make sure she sounded a bit better!
How patronising!!
Can you imagine them even inviting Depp on if he lost & was still accusing Heard?
Then edited it to make it sound a little better???
It all feels very “ grubby”
& underhand, one thing this case has done is make many realise that the media reporting often follows a narrative we’re totally unaware of??
Thanks for confirming this,how you explained it again showed why it just didn’t sound appropriate.
✊♥️( congrats on your subs well deserved😄)
Totally agree. In the recording she is being the dominant one, raised voice, doing most of the talking, intonation, phrasing all of it. Depp is very much the passive one. There is no way that can be said to be her admitting blame because she is trying to placate him.
It seems like the person the interview was using leading questions. Also it doesn't seem like it was a very good idea to edit the interview. I really don't even understand why they were interviewing her. Was it to make her look better or worse??? Before the edits she looked worse.
fact of the day: there’s a product on the market called 💩the bed hot sauce,and like Amber Heard’s testimony I’m not buying that either.
Hahaha..I like your post..very good play on words..
Amber turd probably brough that hot sauce 😂😂
She should get a brand deal 😂
I'm here from Popcorn Planet!!! Happy to subscribe ❤🥰
The Media is deceitful? I am shocked and appalled.
I hope she gets called out publicly for this. If at any time Johnny was feeling he would waive the monetary judgement against her, I hope he rethinks it now. Take her for all that she has and more after this ridiculous interview.
Yes. Why should he go easy on her when she has made it clear she will repeat her lies "till her dying day".
How does any media outlet get away with giving her a platform for what a court has determined are lies?
Amber always talks like she's some leading figure for people.
She talks how a victim might talk because she knows what she's put people through. But she has the emotional impact of a rock.
Here after popcorned planet. Love your channel!
This made me laugh even harder!
According to the stats NBC ratings for this interview were barely above their regular viewership. So, they paid that troglodyte $1 mil and flew her there for the interview and still no one extra bothered to watch.