Glad to know you understand there is a difference. But precision does not apply in this case either. It also can only be referred to as precision if the hole was aimed for, multiple times. And stop being presumptuous.
+Anouar Y the refs check the nets before the match because of this incident, you might see them shaking the net around to check, but it is also hoffenheim's fault as they were at home, does anyone know what the result of the appeal was?
@E_M_E_T phil hems has a point; you can't call it "accuracy" if the player wasn't aiming for it. If I throw a ball of paper over my shoulder and it just so happens to land in a rubbish bin, I'm not accurate; I'm lucky.
You can't really blame the referee for overthrowing his decision during the match, but it's why you wish that replay could have more power in these situations.
This is what VAR is meant for, not if someone's eyelash is offside or if a normal tackle looks like a red card offence when the replay is slowed down to 1/1000 speed.
This is the strangest situation ever seen. All the Leverkusen players clearly noticed the ball wasn't in, but none of the Hoffenheim players or the referee didn't see anything. How is possible?
Kießling knew he had missed. When the ball went through the net he turns away with his hands on his head (the same as you would do if you'd had a great chance a totally missed it) because He knew he'd missed yet he never admitted this to the referee. He should've been honest.
Even beginning youth level referees in the USA are trained to inspect the nets before a match. The referee team / home team / field crew - all fail for an international match of this level. Missing something like that is inexcusable.
+VoqeeOG Many Americans do call the game football. America is very diverse and there are many games played in the US called football including our own variation. Admittedly the strong US national team officially uses the Brit's term "soccer", a hip slang for Association Football. "Soccer" uniquely belongs to the sport and no other. Using the British invented slang "soccer" avoids confusion with the four or five other football sports. Perhaps the US has too much international recreation for your taste, or maybe you are bitter that our Men's and Women's team is performing better than your own national teams. At least we don't call it footer or footie like a child would say.
Great thing about heading a ghost goal... Even the opposition players may not know that it was a no goal since they are too busy getting finisheed with their ariel battles. Then they see the ball in the net
That should count simply because out of every where the ball could have went it got in that ball sized hole that was amazing accuracy. Lucky but funny how he could get it in that little hole but not through the front of the net. Lucky but unlucky guy!
Eso debería contar, simplemente porque, de todo donde la pelota podría haber ido lo puso en esa bola agujero del tamaño que era una precisión asombrosa. Suerte pero divertida cómo podía conseguirlo en ese pequeño agujero, pero no a través del frente de la red. Tipo con suerte, pero la mala suerte!
Honest or not, that "goal," which was clearly not a goal, made the difference in points for Hoffenheim as they lost by a goal (1-2). Leverkusen's busy schedule should not ever be the reason for not having a rematch. Fairness should be about Bundesliga's, not Leverkusen's.
The striker knew it wasn't in. Despite what he said later, you can see him watch it all the way. He grabbed his head in dismay when he realized it went wide of the post.
It's not like they were winning so why were they appealing for a replay? I'd understand if they were drawing or if they were winning but who said hoffenhien were going to come back and win anyway?
No replay. It is part of the game. Nobody complained. Could they? Yes. From that position, you can't head it to the corner, unless with a crazy spin, which wasn't there.
He claims he turned away and that the replay will back that up. Yet this video clearly shows him watching the ball all the way until it hits the side netting haha. Think he might want to see footage 1st in the future before putting comments out in public that make him look like a liar
Great promotional material for the Bundesliga. Admit that once you replayed the game because of similar situation, but don't replay it this time - well done. :D
Kiessling told media lies, look at 0:05, he clearly was angry because he missed and he saw it missed and yet still he told media he did not see, what a cheater
It's your home ground, fix your nets ffs
Lol
2 likes left to make it 666
Nobody noticed it probably. Just a very unlucky/lucky situation.
That accuracy to go through the hole though...
It can only be referred to as accuracy if the hole was aimed for.
Yes, it's precision not accuracy. And stop copying people
Glad to know you understand there is a difference. But precision does not apply in this case either. It also can only be referred to as precision if the hole was aimed for, multiple times. And stop being presumptuous.
pure luck
Almost deserves to count as a goal lol
Fun part of this is that Hoffenheim played home and they should have checked the net by themselves before the match (referee too but OK)
im sure that the refs do a quick inspection of the nets before every game. regardless, it was a funny goal.
+Anouar Y the refs check the nets before the match because of this incident, you might see them shaking the net around to check, but it is also hoffenheim's fault as they were at home, does anyone know what the result of the appeal was?
Eddie Moore No, not because of this incident. The check is standard procedure. If I remember it well the appeal didn't work.
thanks
how do you know the goal didn't rip DURING the match?
This is why Fifa is so realistic
Its its not Fifa tho.
@@htothemas3264 Its a joke you dumb
HToTheMas r/woooosh
It is in fact actually a FIFA game
Strange the guys showing the hole is not at the same side where the ball is already in the goal
Even Kießling thought he missed haha
ChosenOneLego Has nothing to do with the fucking video bitch
Not thought he had missed, knew full well that he had missed.
because he really missed
he knew the goal was guarded so he went in through the hole
Legend!!!
that accuracy tho if the whole was just big enough for the ball to go through
Yes but pure luck, he wasn't aiming for it
oh wow really? I thought he was aiming for the outside of the goal at first.
@E_M_E_T
phil hems has a point; you can't call it "accuracy" if the player wasn't aiming for it. If I throw a ball of paper over my shoulder and it just so happens to land in a rubbish bin, I'm not accurate; I'm lucky.
*Precision
Not accuracy ;)
Hole*
This glitch was patched ages ago
2:34 Wow Klopp and Pep with the other guy is gold
Seeing klop and pep at the end priceless 👌👌
Would goal-line technology work in this situation or would it incorrectly indicate a goal since the ball was beyond the goal-line?
yes
great answer 10/10
y wud u look at the what the technology says when u can see with ur eyes its in the back of the net
goal line technology would say no goal. as it didn't cross the white line, it came in from the side
Wendy Ydnew technology says u are right
You can't really blame the referee for overthrowing his decision during the match, but it's why you wish that replay could have more power in these situations.
This is what VAR is meant for, not if someone's eyelash is offside or if a normal tackle looks like a red card offence when the replay is slowed down to 1/1000 speed.
1:56 where was the goal?
Ye it wasnt goal..
That's the point... There was no goal but it was given
@@timkratz742 Didn't even end up in the net tho lmao
They'd need some sort of video referee to stop things like this from happening
Good lord you predicted var
Wow, maybe they read your comment and led VAR
*HOW NICE*
I'm from the future. We have this thing called VAR (Video Assistant Referree).
Goal-line Tech
This is the strangest situation ever seen. All the Leverkusen players clearly noticed the ball wasn't in, but none of the Hoffenheim players or the referee didn't see anything. How is possible?
Kießling knew he had missed. When the ball went through the net he turns away with his hands on his head (the same as you would do if you'd had a great chance a totally missed it) because He knew he'd missed yet he never admitted this to the referee. He should've been honest.
How would he be sure when the ball was on the net
if you hit the ball with your head, you can't be sure 100% about the goal, cuz your brain is shaked. He saw ball in the net --> this is a goal.
Goal line technology!!!!
Even beginning youth level referees in the USA are trained to inspect the nets before a match. The referee team / home team / field crew - all fail for an international match of this level. Missing something like that is inexcusable.
It wasn't an international match
the day americans call this game football, is the day i will care about americans talking about the sport :)
VoqeeOG Im american... I say football...
+VoqeeOG
Many Americans do call the game football. America is very diverse and there are many games played in the US called football including our own variation. Admittedly the strong US national team officially uses the Brit's term "soccer", a hip slang for Association Football. "Soccer" uniquely belongs to the sport and no other. Using the British invented slang "soccer" avoids confusion with the four or five other football sports. Perhaps the US has too much international recreation for your taste, or maybe you are bitter that our Men's and Women's team is performing better than your own national teams.
At least we don't call it footer or footie like a child would say.
I'm American and I say "Fútbol" (; lol
Great thing about heading a ghost goal... Even the opposition players may not know that it was a no goal since they are too busy getting finisheed with their ariel battles. Then they see the ball in the net
This freaked me out until the hole in the net
Ea should added this feature as a easter egg.....
Yes, these two teams, a corner in the 70th minute and a header would be brilliant
That should count simply because out of every where the ball could have went it got in that ball sized hole that was amazing accuracy. Lucky but funny how he could get it in that little hole but not through the front of the net. Lucky but unlucky guy!
The ball might have made the hole
Therudge Twinsgaming lol funny how nobody else thinks like that. Makes allot more sense that way
Terry Wallace ikr
+Therudge Twinsgaming might have, but highly, highly, highly unlikely. The hole was almost certainly there before the goal was scored (or not scored)
It is only accurate if someone aimed for it.
Who else just clicked on this to find out how this is possible 😂😂
Yup
Me too!
Me!
Yes.
1:53 what a goal
0:28 pause it, you can see it’s outside the goal
Thanks for putting this up :)
Eso debería contar, simplemente porque, de todo donde la pelota podría haber ido lo puso en esa bola agujero del tamaño que era una precisión asombrosa. Suerte pero divertida cómo podía conseguirlo en ese pequeño agujero, pero no a través del frente de la red. Tipo con suerte, pero la mala suerte!
Who's watching in 2021?!
Me
That thing has one in a million chances to occur.
I wonder if the ball broke the net, or if it was so before
0:17 one piece of rope is missing
Honest or not, that "goal," which was clearly not a goal, made the difference in points for Hoffenheim as they lost by a goal (1-2). Leverkusen's busy schedule should not ever be the reason for not having a rematch. Fairness should be about Bundesliga's, not Leverkusen's.
7 years and he still is waiting for rematch.
The striker knew it wasn't in. Despite what he said later, you can see him watch it all the way. He grabbed his head in dismay when he realized it went wide of the post.
yeah right he couldnt see where it hit the net... he's watching it pretty clearly, unless maybe no. 3 is in his line of sight at 1:11.
If someone could enlighten me it would be great but why doesn't the referee just look at a replay to confirm if it's a goal or not?
The Funny part is Klopp telling me to subscribe
Goodbye Stefan! Defo a BL legend in my book, always given a raw deal, passion kept him going all his career!
WHY REPLAY JUST DETUCT THE GOAL
Stefan Kießling never misses
If you look very carefully the hole is visible in the second replay.
Was the match replayed?
Nope
It's not like they were winning so why were they appealing for a replay? I'd understand if they were drawing or if they were winning but who said hoffenhien were going to come back and win anyway?
Because they lost. And if they replay the match, they might win or draw. i don't understand your confusion
Isn't it the official's duty to check the net and stuff before the match?
he hit the only hole in the net
the more holes you make on a net you get less holes
🧠=💥
i remember Frank lampard's goal against Germany, and Marardonas hand of god goal.
that's why, ladies and gentleman, you should check all the equipment in your stadium
that second 'ghost goal' was never a goal easy to see.
Was there a re-match played?
Nice lies, you said you thought the ball didny go on but obviously you clearly knew it didn't go in as you can see on the replay..
Where's Mulder and Scully when you need 'em?
No replay. It is part of the game. Nobody complained.
Could they? Yes. From that position, you can't head it to the corner, unless with a crazy spin, which wasn't there.
1:55 if you pause its not a ghost goal he kicked it out
That referee was at the ucl final ! Nice one uefa
Wait the referee is a doctor?
Thank you I was really wondering how it went in
He claims he turned away and that the replay will back that up. Yet this video clearly shows him watching the ball all the way until it hits the side netting haha. Think he might want to see footage 1st in the future before putting comments out in public that make him look like a liar
when this happens in south American leagues it doesn't matter but when it happens in European leagues ,it disappoints
Great promotional material for the Bundesliga. Admit that once you replayed the game because of similar situation, but don't replay it this time - well done. :D
There was no hole that side
Where did that ghost goal even go in on the old one?
Dont worry guys EA has fixed this in update 4.7.1
omg that was so weird
omg your face is so weird
ChosenOneLego omg all your comments suck and i only saw 4
@Leo.O Football wtf 5 yo video
if his accuracy is that good then I want him on my team
so did they replay the match?
The refree is a Dr??
The weird part is that how did the ball go through the perfect spot
Because if it hadn't we wouldn't be talking about it. Similar to the anthropic principle.
Look at his reaction before the ball going in
Now the ref would have saw that go out then into the net he was looking straight at it and was on the side it went out?
how did it go in the goal??
That explains it that second goal didn't go in how's it famous when its not a phantom goal it's a genuine miss
+Prodigys123xd So what's the difference? It was a miss that became a goal, just like any other phantom goal.
There was a rematch or not after all???
There was none, although there should have been one.
+Abjad Hawez Well why should there be? They won 1-0 legit-ally.
They weren't awarded a rematch
There MUST be a replay.
On 2 replay lumburg s goal did not go in but on first it did strange
The other goal was the camera angle
Glad to see an Aussie at 2:38 (Kruse)
Busque esto enseguida que Miguel Simón lo dijo en el partido de Sevilla-ManU
Explanation: After taking a closer look at the net, the refs saw a hole in the net just big enough for the ball to fit in.
they should've given the other team a courtesy goal and displayed good sportsmanship.
gypshyn or simply removed the ghost goal
whats next , wind scores goal?
Kiessling told media lies, look at 0:05, he clearly was angry because he missed and he saw it missed and yet still he told media he did not see, what a cheater
Why can't the goal just be struck off and the result altered after. Simple.
That's a quantic goal for you
Don't referees check the net before the games?
Siapa yg kesini gara2 ig ? Trus ughtea nya koment ?
Damn.. aku cuk, si ukhti yang bilang HOAX.. iya kan 🤣
gw juga..dasar ughtea naughty
Alan hudson for chelsea v ipswich town in the 70s
Best bit of vid was Jurgen Klopp in BVB shirt
I thought nets were checked by the officials before every game
I like Kießling alot...
wait wtf, all the Hoffenheim defenders were looking at it and didn't see it.
they definitely saw it
This is hilarious, I mean what is the chance for this to happen? 1:100000000000000000000000000?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_truly_large_numbers
I just signed up to channel because Klopp said so. And Pep was behind.
Maybe the net's wholes are just really big the ball went through one of them
Was it on the defending's team home pitch? If so, well they should take that as a lesson to take care of their shit.
SynysterGatesNo2 Yes, it was in Hoffenheim.
Konami needs to fix this problem
Why should we replay? It was an honest mistake and we have Champions League games to play...
Not as good as the England ghost goal v Germany 1966 or the revenge when no Lampard goal v Germany in 2010.
Damn ea......
Back then when VAR wasn't a thing