Jordan Peterson and Paul Kengor - Where the Modern Left's Arrogance Comes From
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- Jordan Peterson and Paul Kengor talks about where the modern left's arrogance comes from.
To support daily videos and receive special perks, please consider becoming a Liberty Vault member:
/ @liberty-vault
Original video:
• The Devil and Karl Mar...
Do you agree with Jordan Peterson and Paul Kengor?
For more liberty clips, subscribe to my channel and click the bell!
Bro 2 weeks later and it's already so.much arrogance.
Straight to your face insult your intelligence.
People get angry at JP because he puts his finger on the pulse of people's prejudice, myopia, and fragile egos!
If you knew the inside baseball with Jordan, you wouldn't be so quick to idolize him :)
@@shieldmcshieldy5750 I'm curious what you mean. I've argued with a lot of critics, though my intention isn't to argue, and after watching probably dozens of hours of his lectures and reading two of his books I can't say I see anything reprehensible about him
@@shieldmcshieldy5750 Oh dear, another "omniscient" keyboard prophet, seer, and revelator?!
@@timothyglassbrook4886
In another comment, they accuse him of "gang stalking Red Jester".
What that means, I'm not sure...
Did a quick search, google "jordan peterson Red Jester", there appears to be a RUclips channel named "The Red Jester" which has quite a few playlists labeled "Crazies", sorted by date, several days and weeks consecutively, filled with videos from JBP, Tim Pool, other relatively benign people.
Intuition: alternate account/sock-puppet cryptically hinting at (likely imagined) personal grievance.
Or this data could mean nothing. Who knows.
I think people get mad at Jordan Peterson because he’s benzodiazepine brain fried idiot
“Critics are men who watch a battle from a high place then come down and shoot the survivors.” - Ernest Hemingway
Their arrogance comes from their ignorance.
Arrogance seems to be a coping mechanism for insecurity, usually born from being dumb.
Any ideology that says "You can do whatever you want, as long as you vote for us" would create nothing But arrogance.
That's what I was going to say.
Very true
Not true at all. Their arrogance comes from their true belief they are better than the rest of us and they have an ideology to prove it. They are counting on your ignorance to carry out their plan ... which they are ... successfully, too. Oh, the irony.
Arrogance hides intellectual laziness.
It’s everything I despised about my graduate program in fine arts, and academia when I was a fine arts professor, ramming Foucault down our throats, mercilessly, etc. I always stood up to it, until I finally quit in protest of corruption in academia, in 2018. I taught at GWU in DC. The students were NEVER, the problem, it was the administration.
Idk if you’d agree or not, but would you say you still see the value in teaching fine arts without having to attach people like Foucault to everything? If so, I really appreciate that because many on the right (I’m on the right btw) tend throw the baby out with the bath water. They see what the radical left is doing and overcorrect, such as “I’ll show those leftists what’s what and give up on fine and liberal arts altogether.” I don’t blame you for leaving at all, but I’m glad you tried.
They have run every one of character and integrity out of every area of our nation. You have to be very well off and financially secure to fight the fire with fire and sadly many of us have other responsibilities that tend to keep us from that fight at least until it’s all we have left. Your not alone.
Duke was exactly the same… i was in the Literature department. There were ONLY Crit Theorists in the Literature department.
What a luxury listening to a conversation between these two great thinkers.
Their arrogant because they think they’re the beginning and the end all.
Your final arguments remind me of the sixties and seventies in communist Hungary where it was understood that the society has to be beaten back to stone age level and only then can the successful construction start. There was a lot of deliberate destruction with the conviction that they were doing the possible best thing for the future. It is sad to see trajectory of the West.
They're tearing down the beautiful old mission churches in California???? I am so done with these monsters!
Indeed, it is difficult to believe that a people so committed to destruction have any interest whatsoever in building something new after their work of destruction is complete. #WakeUpFromWoke
Marx was a TOTAL loser.
To Carl Marx, the call to the destruction of everything, would have little to no effect; as the miserable loser had nothing tangible to lose.
Along with his followers.
I am reminded of the Pharisee in the parable, standing in the middle of the Temple and loudly praying, "O Lord, I thank Thee that Thou hast not made me as other men"
ayn Rand pointed out all of this in the 30's and 40's. Peterson disparages her without looking at her product much at all In "We, The Living'. she explains it in the heroine's speech to the commissar, before blows his brains out. In "The Fountainhead', it's Toohey's speech to Peter Keating. They intend to RULE, even if it's over mere ashes
Arrogant = Shallow
Arrogant may equate to “RUN A GROUND.”
They give themselves great credit for little if any accomplishments. Participation trophy winners.
I came across a book written by a professor of aboriginal studies from Winnipeg yesterday. On the second page he spoke about how monuments had been erected in that city, one’s that should be celebrated. What he was talking about wasn’t something new but instead the statues that had been pulled down. For him this was a triumph. As I recall he took pleasure in the fact that at least one of the statues had been decapitated. Remember too that the desecration of these monuments (in one video you can see a young scholar attempting to engage the Queen’s head in fellatio) happened in response to stories about mass graves that made zero sense from the beginning.
I wonder what JP would think about the destruction of Aboriginal art. Would he condemn the destruction of thousands of years old caves containing rock art by mining companies. This happened in Western Australia. Rio Tinto was the vandal that blew up the cave. I am against destruction of statues - even offensive ones. History no matter how hurtful represents the truth and should be preserved. We should learn from history but we don't.
@@elizabethcooke8998I would imagine he would.
While I would prefer those remain, there's a fundamental difference in motivation as well as outcome. In what Peterson is talking about you have needless destruction for destructions sake and no benefit whatsoever, while in the case you mentioned there some public good advanced in the availability of new resources. All things being equal I'd prefer to keep the art if it's at all possible, but let's not pretend there's any kind of moral equivalence to these two situations in either outcome or motivation.
Leftists can't even erect men.
They assume they have “social conscience” repeating their fallacies.
being critically conscious means analyzing everything through marxist conflict theory. or it’s just a self proclamation of being brainwashed. either way, believe people when they say stuff like that haha
It's almost like they've never heard the one, "Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it." Like, no, we keep the statues up to remind us, but we don't dwell on the negative. On the contrary, we give it new meaning, but we don't forget.
Envy, frustration, vengeance seems to be the primary motivator.
Self-loathing people that have to convince others that they are morally superior. Talk about a living hell.
I'm going to put forward a different take on this. During my research on the "New Woman" and Progressivism in late 19th century America, three of the characteristics of these then-liberal women were that they were 1) young 2) beautiful and 3) wealthy. It was the naively self-confident daughters of wealth- often the children of self-made men- who had ironically grown up with servants and the deference that wealth and beauty engender, the doors they open, and the pride they bring, who were able to go to the forward-thinking colleges and then engage in low-paying or non-paying "social work" to help "the poor." (Middle-class and higher women had always helped the poor, but this was often coupled with a very real sense of Christian duty that while it did NOT remove the sense of moral and social superiority, the Christian impulse perhaps softened it a little.) However, in the late 19th century we see real noblesse oblige and outright condescension. One article in particular (that I'd have to find the reference for) featured a young, educated woman rather smugly and sarcastically teaching "Mrs. Old Ways" the scientific ways to better clean house, etc. I wonder if ironically it is may be this mindset (pride and self-confidence from Daddy's or Grandads' money, the knowledge of some supposed facts, and a deep although perhaps unconscious sense of superiority and "we know better than you") that is still behind some of the left leaderships' paradigm.
Absolutely.
Undoubtedly. Rich, arrogant snobs wallowing in money and living in mansions have no business railing about inequity, regardless of what color or creed they are. Talk about utter hubris and boundless hypocrisy. The truly disgusting part about it is there are actually people stupid enough to believe their crap.
I'm frequently reminded by this topic of King Crimson's brilliant 21st Century Schizoid Man, and the reference to "paranoia's poison thorn". A common thread in ideological thought is the assumption of intentionality for social causation where none exists
Walz let Christopher Columbus statue be tore down at the Minnesota Capitol and had the Minnesota highway patrol watch and make sure nobody stopped it.
He had it removed to replace it with a giant chicken statue in honor of his military service. 🐔
@@stephenkalatucka6213😂
columbo
Sadly, the people who most need the moral and intellectual "leavening" of Mr. Peterson's insights are deaf and blind.
Pity they are neither mute nor halt, which might otherwise gift them with opportunity of reflection.
It comes from the overamplification of their view online, due to the narrativ industry. Their world view was on steriods. Now since Musk freed at least Twitter many are in withdrawl
We have some amazing works of art in our country. Thank you very much. Professor. the new artist, the new artist cannot compare to what we had in the past not even close
I personally think that it comes from their view of conservatives and the belief in religion. They see the right as childish in these beliefs and deserving of condescension.
The left have constructed a new religion of dogmas and credos that they hold so dear that they will rise up in indignant fury to defend their religion if anybody dares to offend their beliefs. Ie. Prosecution of anybody who defaces a rainbow icon whether on a street or a flag
In order for their ideas to be taken seriously and adopted by the masses, they have to elevate themselves morally in some way. They have to make themselves morally "better" than past figures in order to legitimize their ideas.
Everyone's idea is legitimate if there is truly free speech. But really free speech does not exist. Some people like JP have a platform to spread their views widely. Broadcast media represent the views of a corporation and not individuals. Their power is so great that many prevent their viewers from hearing the truth. This is an infringement on free speech. They also utilise their power to attack individuals and encourage their viewers to pile on. This is bullying and an abuse of the right to free speech
Focault defoned liberalism as "pushing the envelope" - it's all about being pushy at the daycare
Re. "The overthrow of every social condition" - This feeds right into what Ayn Rand talked about, that "they hate existence" itself. She knew this from her time in the Soviet Union, and said the only state of existence that would satisfy them is death. They will never admit this. They're constantly running away from this. She said that when they impose orders for us to obey, they're not satisfied with our obedience, because their orders are just a silent scream to avoid the fact that the death they really want is their own. The moment you obey, they'll come up with new orders. It's really useless, because it won't get you anywhere. The point is not your obedience. They're distracting from their self-hatred.
I believe what motivates their leaders is power, money, and status, but their minions seem to soley have a lust for destruction for destructions sake. I guess if they ever do get power, the uncontrollable minions will be dealt with like they have been in the past. It's the same as worshipping Satan. Satan would take no greater pleasure than to turn on the very people that supported him.
Great clip!
Though I like Jordan Peterson a lot, I have found a way to quickly get the point being made WHEN he is "interviewing" someone (i.e. when he is constantly interrupting his guests) : I drag to fast forward using the baseline "red point" ("scrubber" or "seek bar" might actually be called), carefully watching the short moments in which the guest is allowed to express himself, then stop, , then listen to the guest until he is interrupted again. That way, I get the essence of what the interviewee is actually saying. A 12 minute interview was thus turned into a 3 minute interesting exposition of facts by the guest (the person whose interesting views made him be brought to the interview in the first place).
As one of the persons who commented upon this video, the "modern" left's arrogance comes from the leftists' ignorance of Marxism and the racist and class-struggle resentment viewpoints of the founders of Marxism (Marx & Engels) and their not-modern (Victorian) views of reality. Marxism is the revenge of the resented (there is nothing modern about the "modern" left: Same old story as ever).
The fast forward thing...I do it too. My favorite is when he asks the guest a question then answers the question himself.
Black people ignore Margaret Sanger's opinions of black people people so it's not surprising they ignore Marx and Ingles too.
It’s mostly blue haired young whites who like Marx bc he never wanted to work. You’re right about the Margaret Sanger thing though. Abortion clinics are full of black women who just can’t handle the expense of another baby.
In my day we'd say "Jim Rice hit 20 home runs so if he recommends Kahn's hot dogs, I'll take his word!"
Today they say "He said something offensive once so he is a BAD man!"
No more merit. And how convenient coming from people who never did anything noteworthy.
Let's keep "underground utilities" like SEWER LINES, Water Towers, and electricity for my battery 🔋 charger
Power corrupts. If you had power over people with which you disagreed, you would get arrogant as well.
IGNORANCE IS BLISS (fortunately I am not!) TRUMP AD-VANCE 2024!
Noah was perfect in his generations means his bloodline wasn't corrupted. He had pure genetics.
It comes from college, they're taught they're above John Q public
They think themselves superior to the ignorant peasants.
Many peasants abound in wisdom and resilient survival life skills!
Haters. That's how they out themselves. All HATERS unite you.
TRUMP AD-VANCE 2024!
THE GREATEST ELATION I've ever experiences was about 2 minutes in a high school pep rally that turned into a riot.
Personally, I've always thought their arrogance comes from the cretinous idea that history has an arc, that it's going somewhere, and that it validates you. History is just a bunch of stuff that happened. That's all it is. There is no more validation available in it than there is in a rock you might kick as you're walking down the road. But the idea is attractive to them because, essentially, it allows you to present yourself as a "good" person no matter what you do. It's actually a form of taqiyya.
Thanos level arrogance
SELFRIGHTIOUSNESS!!!!
I support capitalism.
Paul Kengor is a fantastic author
This is critical: moral superiority is sin. This isn't a definition. This is the ACTIVITY of sin. How do you, as an academic, address this reality? From within the Academy of Christ. Within this academy, we endorse and support in one another, freedom from sin -- won for humanity by the incarnate word and will of creation's purpose -- eternally sinless man, and woman. A sinless virgin accepts the Divine proposal to gestate, and birth the sinless Divine human Being. This Being surrenders his mother to us all -- that we may be eternally sinless human beings, as well, for all eternity. Thus -- we relinquish the moral superiority game/conflict/war/hell/ urgency to destroy one another -- to love one another. This is beyond the temporal versions of "superior." There's no higher calling than perfect love. It only costs us identity with sin. Get started. Forever never ends. ❤ 🕊
Forgive me but I thought that Jesus Christ died on the cross for our sins not Mary. We are human and therefore sinners according to scriptures. I have throughout my life made lots of mistakes. I have deliberately done the wrong thing but not often. I have not deliberately hurt anyone physically or psychologically. I don't think I am morally superior. I just accept that sometimes I'll fail to do the right thing or understand something. A loving God would not blame me they would love me as you believe you are loved. The God of the new testament would forgive. I think it would be arrogance to believe that I understand God, how could I, there is so much I don't know and understand about everything.
@@elizabethcooke8998 e.c. -- surrender all your thoughts, words, actions, joys and sufferings, daily, always, to this Beloved Redeemer. He'll do the same for you. You'll come to know Him, somewhat, here in this generous, temporal allowance -- this benevolent introduction to His eternal embrace, beyond all manner of understanding or investigation or conjecture. He'll reveal how He feels about Mary, lest ye be surprised or distraught, entering into the multifold surround of her golden attire. The Queen stands at His right hand, arrayed in gold!
They have a false sense of moral superiority
"Blessed are the meek..."
I feel like mentioning, in reference to Marx's racial comments at 4:10, during Marx's time the N-word wasn't derogatory, it was simply the word for working-class black person.
Of course they are great writers and poets...they have all that time sitting around thinking of ways they can justify taking the assets of people who work and create while those people are away working!
We should one day talk face to face.
You'd love it. I don't think anything bad or want anything bad.
Plus makes communication much more clear. Intent more obvious.
They're just entitled spoiled brats. Thinking they know more than anyone else. Can't stand Picasso though. That's goofball art
Every generation has its teenagers, both literally and figuratively. Emotional, hormonal, deluded on their own invincibility and superior understanding of everything. In terms intellectualism and ideology what we're going through is not new, just the newest iteration. The Revolution that birthed the USSR. Reading some of the words of CS Lewis you hear about "modern" parents who are firm believers in the "New School" (and all their subsequent doppelgangers in academia and culture). The mutation and infection of Post-modernism into any subject outside of art. Just to name a select few examples. There is nothing new under the sun.
It starts with a devout belief in evolution-they see themselves as higher on the evolutionary scale than anyone in the past.
We have a word for the Marx theology already. It's called nihilism so I guess we could call Marxism malignant nihilism and not be wrong.
OMG, the other guy actually got a point in… you gotta be quick in a “conversation” (lecture, inevitably) with JP…
he mentions, in this 10 minute clip:
Noah
Picasso
Mephistopheles
Moses
???
(I must be pretty dim witted despite doing a lot reading, cause I just can’t follow Dr P’s logic. Everything traces back to the bible? Really?)
Good in generation means he wasn’t a Nephilim
02:00 Never view historical events or people through a modern lens. You'll get the wrong picture every single time. History must always be viewed in context!
07:00 What these people are doing is exactly what Marx wanted. They would not change their behavior even if they understood.
08:00 Mao's four "olds"
10:50 Same thing in the French Revolution. Note that they basically had the idea to banish Christianity from France because they saw the church as part of the old royal order.
paCÂsœ 😂
I love JP
You shouldn't trust anything that an author produces that provides a moral justification for bad behavior that he himself engages in or wishes to engage in. It is important that the author have a personal stake in the justification I believe, and not just an academic one.
For example, if a person who has no racist tendencies produces a treatise which justifies racism, that shouldn't be treated as skeptically as if that person behaved as a racist. Taking the opposite position, if a person who deeply wants to believe that the races are of equal value and acts that way produces a treatise in which treating races equally is considered moral, that should be treated skeptically.
Regarding "bad behavior" it is up to the individual to decide what it is. There is no need for a universal or timeless definition. You can look at the present or the past through the present moral system or the past moral system, it doesn't matter.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.......Sound familiar???
1:25 Sometimes there's a man... sometimes there's a man.
Is population growth linear or exponential!
Winning WW2.
Moral superiority is not claimed by the art critic, that comes from you Peterson, your interpretation is biased by your experience, it counts for nothing to no one but you. That's why you'r3e not an art critic. I love Peterson's references to Biblical fairy tales.
Intellectual arrogance. . . Totally wrong. Moral arrogance.
Good what do you mean
Sorry, but the German word, Neger, is not at all the same as the n-word in English. Marx could very well have been racist, I think he was, but I don't think it is accurate (as someone fluent in German) to say that those two words carry the same weight.
A bunch of people in the comments crying about how arrogant democrats are. 😂 This is not the republican party I remember. Both sides suffer from the same delusion that politicians will solve their problems. Do the work.
Nonsense!
I believe that the term "perfect in his generations" is pointing out that none of Noah's ancestors intermarried with the descendants of Cain.
God forbade the intermarriage of the "sons of God" (descendants of Adam & Eve) with the daughters of men (Cain's descendants.) (Genesis 6:1-4)
The reason for this, was so that Adam's descendants would not be swayed to evil, by the comely maidens whose natures were ruined--comparatively speaking-- as opposed to those of Adam.
Even the WISEST MAN WHO EVER LIVED, King Solomon, was corrupted by women from foreign religions and cultures that rebelled against the true God of heaven, and so the descendants of Adam never stood a chance when intermarrying with the rebellious offspring of Cain.
Hopefully this is helpful.
The Bible interprets itself.
"Perfect in his generations" pertains to not having his DNA tainted with that of the offspring of the fallen angels. That is why they were forbidden to intermarry with those descendants. Satan wanted to interrupt/usurp the lineage to Christ.
They probably listen to rap also😂😂😂😂😂
Noah, wife, sons and daughters in laws had pure DNA. “Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord” (Gen 6:8).
God needed to destroy every human being except Noah and his family was the sin mentioned in Genesis 6:1-4, when “the Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them.” As evil reproduced and overtook the world, the most merciful act God could perform was to start over.
The Art critic sounds like a psychiatrist.
Could the new head of the World Economic Forum be the illegitimate great grand son of Marx....?
Where did you hear this?
@@oliveoil7642 A distant cousin maybe?? :-)
What does that word do without your offensive dimension to consider so powerful, control and I am talking about him Mr Peterson I am still waiting for a response, this is boring mostly cause he's control
PM Macdonald (of Canada), as an architect of the residential school system, which was an application of claimed jurisdiction that contravened a number of treaties made with Indigenous Peoples, deserves to have the full context of his actions shared - he and the organized churches created intergenerational trauma and effects that First Nations are still emerging from. Why sharing that history troubles Peterson is strange. (He's so trapped in Left vs everything...and given his current online missionary work for Christianity, he's not likely to discuss such.) In the end, he is either unaware of key aspects of CDN history or purposely ignoring them.
Inter generational trauma exists in all peoples of the earth. All races have experienced it at different historical timelines.
The modern day right just endlessly whine and act the victim.
Lol. The modern day left’s entire ethos is based on elevating and worshipping whoever is the biggest victim. It’s the victimhood Olympics.
Gee, they only address complete strawman, AGAIN.
I wish JP would stop quoting the bible. To me it somewhat diminishes his credibility. Which for a towering intellect such as his is frustrating.
Heaven knows that citing ancient wisdom from a library of the past is not becoming of a learned man. :eyeroll:
@@rusmeister7144 There's nothing in the bible, nor any religious book, that's necessary for learnedness.
As a work of fiction the bible may have some merit for imparting insights, in the same way as Shakespeare or JG Ballard for example.
But for the atheist and the antitheist it's like quoting from Lord of the Rings in a philosophical or political debate. smh
@@derekspitz9225 the level of ignorance in this comment is so vast that it’s not worth responding to, except to point it out to the peanut gallery. All of the great writers and thinkers of western civilization, anno Domini were familiar with biblical content at the very least. From Thomas Aquinas to Shakespeare to Dr Johnson to Mark Twain to GK Chesterton (that’s leaving out the pantheon of writers and thinkers and other languages, like French, Italian, German, Russian, and so on, who all had read the Bible and new large parts of it by heart). You DON’T have that knowledge, but think yourself smarter and better educated than them, just because you have a smartphone?
@@rusmeister7144 Bible is primitive philosophy
@@whousa642 Says a man with zero knowledge of it.
The communist manifesto was a presentation and a critique of some of the communist ideas being presented in Europe at the time. They were not Marx ideas But a lot of the communist manifesto published today only have the presentation and not the critique.
Karl Marx reject any notit of overpowering or take over
What's the origin of Peterson's truculent stupidity?
nice try lefty
@@whousa642 Thank you, I thought so too.
@@CarmenVeranda not self aware
@@whousa642 or so self-aware it's self-referential irony. Ah ha...
Little turd on the bottom of a great man’s show.
More pish from the rager.
Peterson - I know what is truly great, who was great, and I am so sure on that I can say so without a hint of anything otherwise, but let me tell you about liberal intellectual arrogance.
By the way, I went to the Prado last year and viewed several hundred portraits of saints without seeing even one such disclaimer he describes.
He's lying. I'm out at 45 seconds, why waste more time on his false apocryphals?
You are on your way out because you disagree with his ideology or point of view and analysis. He doesn't come across as arrogant. You have obviously never seen the humble side that comes out on other shows he's done and other interviews. He's a psychoanalyst, for God's sake. He's also very well read. Something that many so-called intellectuals lack in a huge way. Besides, he has proved common sense and logic are not so common these days, especially in universities and most of all in the halls of government.
@@AndthenthereisCencorship-xc6yi I agree he has wild mood swings from sputtering indignation at straw man "libtards" to histrionic tears at the thought of all those poor young men, in their mom's basements - as though his feelings and $3 will get them a cup.of coffee.
It's not that I "disagree with him" - it's that I was at the Prado last year and he is lying. Also went to the Boston Museum of fine arts, where one might guess would be ground zero - Winslow Homer, john singer seargent, still there and no sign disclaiming them. Demonstrable lies, misleading the gullible. He thinks his gross exaggerations are perfectly fine because his sh*t don't stink. I agree that we disagree on that.
@@AndthenthereisCencorship-xc6yi I have seen him wildly swing from sputtering imperious at the "libtards" to breaking down in tears over his own choice of victimhood. Both extremes are embarrassing.
In the vocabulary of iain mcgilchrest, he's 90% left brain in a right brains clothing. He is not guided by curiosity and a robust world view, he demands precision only in service of his own single mindedness.
What disclaimer do you think that Peterson describes as existing next to paintings?
I listen to two seconds of this video so I could make the comment on Jordan Peterson talking about someone else’s arrogance now there’s a funny funny ha ha of the smelly type
Would it be out of line to suggest that you suffer from a similar conundrum?
@@Runescaper1357 are you we could say it about anyone but it wouldn't be like saying it about Peterson who is seemingly as arrogant as men become
@@tsmart9478 You would do well to learn how write!
@@sunriseboy4837 the funnest is fun voice recognition snafu how write you
Have you tried self-awareness? Ever?
Ask Jordan about how he helped gang stalk "Red Jester". No, really. Don't idolize this sociopath.
Nobody cares about your internet waifu obsession
Noah being perfect in his generations means that his DNA had not been corrupted by the fallen angels, as was many people's and animals on the Earth. Purging the surface of the Earth of these unsanctioned nephilim creatures, who, upon death, became disembodied demons, was accomplished by the flood. Had things continued as before, Jesus' bloodline would've been corrupted, and salvation would not be possible. ✝️
It must be awful for Peterson to have his greatest heroes - Solzhenitsyn and Dostoyevsky - openly despise his current semite employer.
Likely the source of his recent breakdowns.
This a great video!!