Star Wars Saga on 4K; worth the upgrade?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
  • Check out the original saga with rogue one and decide if it's worth the upgrade from you current blu rays!
    Buy Here:
    Episode 1 amzn.to/3dbdFzn
    Episode 2 amzn.to/30NFucb
    Episode 3 amzn.to/3iCIJt2
    Episode 4 amzn.to/30LeTN1
    Episode 5 amzn.to/3d88Nv2
    Episode 6 amzn.to/2SDVHfv
    Rogue One amzn.to/30PGTz4
    Skywalker Saga amzn.to/3nw2SVn

Комментарии • 290

  • @nosferdractu
    @nosferdractu 4 года назад +114

    I agree. Prequels, Original Trilogy, and Rogue One are all I really need.

    • @digitaldebauchery9116
      @digitaldebauchery9116 4 года назад +21

      Pretty much where I am too. Tho I'm not gonna lie I did enjoy Solo enough.

    • @RandomGuy285
      @RandomGuy285 3 года назад +6

      Original Trilogy is all I really need

    • @chrisgetchell6337
      @chrisgetchell6337 3 года назад +5

      Except that the original and the prequels end up being the ones that look the worst in 4k lol

    • @JohnStopman
      @JohnStopman 3 года назад +5

      _"I agree. Prequels, Original Trilogy, and Rogue One are all I really need."_
      The Disney produced third trilogy is putting the whole movie business to shame.

    • @bbp2930
      @bbp2930 3 года назад +8

      Only episodes 1-6

  • @scottwallace1
    @scottwallace1 4 года назад +73

    The Phantom Menace was shot on 35mm film (one very short scene was shot digitally, and is obvious). Attack of the Clones was the first major motion picture shot on digital HD.

    • @il100374
      @il100374 4 года назад +2

      @Mike P AOTC began filming first, and came out in May of 2002. 28 Days Later came out in June.

    • @CDubya.82
      @CDubya.82 4 года назад +2

      All 6 have CG that I doubt was rendered in 4K so you’re not watching the 35mm original scan anyway.

    • @ssssssssssssssssss50
      @ssssssssssssssssss50 3 года назад +3

      Which scene is that?

    • @alcarbo8613
      @alcarbo8613 3 года назад +1

      *Actually it was shot on 70mm film

    • @ginarae5739
      @ginarae5739 5 месяцев назад

      AOTC should be reclassified.. "Feature Length Animation" 🧐

  • @reepacheirpfirewalker8629
    @reepacheirpfirewalker8629 4 года назад +28

    My own thoughts on the Sequels are that I put them into the regard as fan fiction because Lucas made a full story and it began and ended with his approval adding Clone wars to the mix is as important as the Original trilogy IMO.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +13

      I agree. Nothing about the sequels feels like it fits in the universe that they are supposedly the conclusion of. Fan fiction indeed.

    • @reepacheirpfirewalker8629
      @reepacheirpfirewalker8629 4 года назад +4

      @@theblureview1083 It really is sad I remember back between 1978-1983 when my friends and I played with our Star Wars figures we all knew the things that if anyone wanted to play Star Wars and was using them the way the JJ and KK were setting up we'd ask if they knew what the movie was about.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +6

      Haha, exactly my point when people ask why I don't like them. When I'm watching the new movies it is painfully obvious that nobody that's creatively involved behind the movies knows what star wars is about or even that they're aware of what took place in the movies before .

    • @Webshooters1
      @Webshooters1 4 года назад +3

      @@theblureview1083 I seem to have found my people xD There's just alot of problems with those movies. There's no world-building so everything feels small, the legacy characters are shit on (Luke got it the worst) and they just don't feel like Star Wars. Sure they use iconography but fail to understand WHY it was iconic and the less said about TLJ the better. Those bombers were the WORST design I ever saw and honestly a liability in battle. Y-Wings exist, they fufill the same function and are much faster and Holdo being obstinate about the plan made matters worse.
      Frankly everyone involved got dealt bad hands but John Boyega got dealt a particularly shit hand. Finn HAD potental in his backstory as a Stormtrooper and could've led to drama like not wanting to shoot other troopers because they're just like he was, brainwashed so he'd be inclined instead to try and save them and he really should've been force sensitive tbh but no, his character progressively gets wasted more and more until in Rise Of Palpatine, he's struggling desperately to justify being in the movie!

  • @windfire5380
    @windfire5380 4 года назад +49

    Totally agree.. First 6 movies + Rogue One is the universe of movies.

    • @Chrisday90
      @Chrisday90 4 года назад +2

      So you think the atrocious Episode 1 and 2 is better than the sequel trilogy? I would be concerned if you actually felt that way. I cant get through 10 minutes of the acting and dialogue

    • @Chrisday90
      @Chrisday90 4 года назад +1

      @A Playa Named Mike Bleezy I like episode 3-9. I just find 1 and 2 unwatchable

    • @windfire5380
      @windfire5380 4 года назад +6

      @@Chrisday90 Absolutely. The first 2 movies were overly childish and not at the same level for sure. However, they didn't spit in the face of our heroes. I am concerned you don't see this. :) LOL

    • @Chrisday90
      @Chrisday90 4 года назад

      @@windfire5380 Iike the idea that the old group were expendable. It makes watching something less predictable. Everyone wants the happy group hug Hollywood ending. I like that it didn't end with Return of the Jedi. Not enough lives were spent

    • @vstar7196
      @vstar7196 4 года назад

      Rogue One, followed by Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back, and give Return Of the Jedi an honourable mention. You can shit can the rest of the films.

  • @davy_K
    @davy_K 4 года назад +31

    Agree. Eps 1-6 + Rogue. I have "forgot" those awful sequels that throw away the entire story arc. Complete madness.

  • @aaronamos4503
    @aaronamos4503 4 года назад +45

    Too bad they didn't release the original trilogy undoctored as well!!

    • @DarthG3nesis
      @DarthG3nesis 4 года назад

      That's because "undoctored" Versions of the Originaltrilogy are destroyed....

    • @ghostviggen
      @ghostviggen 4 года назад +1

      Mike P
      You can restore it good enough.

    • @zenquantum1246
      @zenquantum1246 4 года назад +9

      Look for the fan "despecialized" versions or the fan 4K77, 4K80 and 4K83 projects

  • @bazzzzz6175
    @bazzzzz6175 4 года назад +17

    Thumbs up for not buying the dismal Disney trilogy lol. Hearing mostly underwhelming reviews for the 4k's. I'll stick with my blu's just now.

    • @darthracer777
      @darthracer777 4 года назад +1

      I disagree. My 4K TROS dvd has great picture and sound quality. Very satisfied.

    • @larryversion3300
      @larryversion3300 4 года назад

      Some Guy 99 that’s actually the reason I didn’t go for the individual releases. I never understand the reasoning behind that. They release all these new cases of the previous 10 to make it uniform then released the last one and changed it again? Stupid and annoying

  • @roguetrooper5288
    @roguetrooper5288 4 года назад +26

    The Phantom Menace was shot on 35mm film.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +12

      Yes it was largely shot on 35mm but it also was one of the first films to also have scenes shot digitally. Any scene that require VFX (which was most of them) were rendered in 2K. Its actually a pretty complicated process if you look up some info on it. Either way, the 4K presentation isn't native 4k like many 35mm films, it is an upscale 4K from a 2K DI.

    • @chrisd6736
      @chrisd6736 4 года назад +1

      Yes it contains both 1080 digital and 35mm shots.

    • @superspartan007
      @superspartan007 4 года назад

      TheBluReview It’s actually sourced from a 4K DI that Disney created in 2014

    • @alcarbo8613
      @alcarbo8613 3 года назад

      *Actually the Phantom Menace was shot on 70mm film

    • @roguetrooper5288
      @roguetrooper5288 3 года назад

      @@alcarbo8613 no it wasn't

  • @paulhenner8914
    @paulhenner8914 4 года назад +26

    People are interested in the quality of the 4K...…….NOT the bloody packaging ! ! !

    • @jackmanning1117
      @jackmanning1117 4 года назад +11

      Paul Henner I’m interested in the packaging. I already own the 4K box set and I wanted to take a look at this to see if there were any with cool packaging that I should pick up as well

    • @leaphardotnet
      @leaphardotnet 4 года назад +2

      totally agree, watched the whole video to realize that the guy talk only about the boxes. WTF !

    • @SoapNugget
      @SoapNugget 4 года назад +3

      Dude the packaging is one of the biggest things I look at if the 4k comes in a steelbook I'm gonna spend the extra money to just buy the packaging the packaging is one of the best parts

    • @paulhenner8914
      @paulhenner8914 4 года назад

      @@SoapNugget Firstly I am not a Dude and obviously you have never heard of the adage "You can't judge a book by its cover" Have a nice day !

    • @SoapNugget
      @SoapNugget 4 года назад +4

      @@paulhenner8914 I call everyone dude it's just my thing

  • @CDubya.82
    @CDubya.82 4 года назад +6

    I highly doubt the CG “enhancements” Lucas made to Ep 4, 5 & 6 were rendered in 4K, even if the original movie was photographed on 35mm. Essentially I’d say you’re getting an upscale on all 7 you’ve got there.

    • @rebelscum1925
      @rebelscum1925 2 года назад +1

      Not all 7 to be sure. I know that Rogue One was shot on 6.5k and the digital effects were rendered in 4K-DI. Rogue One is true 4K

  • @samspeaks2016
    @samspeaks2016 4 месяца назад

    Is it worth collecting now in 2024 with each release (Lucas age SW movies) hovering around $70-$100 each?

  • @maverickd.t.l.9749
    @maverickd.t.l.9749 Год назад +3

    I must say I HATE when people say they, “don’t consider the newest of the saga part of the saga”.
    This simple is NOT FACT !
    It is part of the saga and thus the story of the skywalker saga.
    I do AGREE !
    They were not as good.
    But get over it if you are a STAR WARS FAN ( at the least ) and want to own this series you MUST GET the WHOLE SAGA.
    NOT STOIES AS MUCH JUST THE SAGA in itself.
    But that is so hardheaded of an individual to avoid THREE movies simply because they weren’t as good but still but the rest???
    Hypocritical.

  • @markstanbrook5578
    @markstanbrook5578 4 года назад +2

    Just got the 27 disc special edition. Same discs as these afaik. Just to say the box they come in is Apple-like in its quality. And you get a neat hardback book. Price is the same as buying all 9 movies on 4K so I feel pleased.

    • @Mike_v_E
      @Mike_v_E 3 года назад

      Do the discs get scratched easily becausr they’re in the sleeves?

  • @richardklug822
    @richardklug822 Год назад +1

    Sticking with the prequels and Rogue One on Blu-ray, but only have DVD versions of the original trilogy. Best Buy sold 4K versions of those for $13.99 each on the 4th so I couldn't resist the upgrade.

  • @Webshooters1
    @Webshooters1 4 года назад +1

    I have The Complete Saga 2015 reissue so is it worth getting these releases if I don't own an Ultra HD Blu-Ray player?
    Also yes, Prequels and OT. That's the story George wanted to tell and did so.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      If you don't have a 4K player then these wouldn't even be able to be used. Its a good idea though if you plan on getting a player in the future.

  • @kalmtraveler
    @kalmtraveler 3 года назад +1

    Like you I also only consider episodes 1-6 as 'real' Star Wars (Rogue One was ok too but I've never felt a need to own it). That being said, looks like at Best Buy the individual movies are about $20-24 each in 4k, so $120-150ish to buy 1-6. There's a 'Skywalker Saga' set from the UK which is region free for about 200. Do you think there's any reason to pay $50 more for 3 movies I don't ever want to watch again, but just for the boxed set and any special features that includes that you wouldn't get with the individual movies?

  • @adamhodgins3217
    @adamhodgins3217 4 года назад +3

    just a personal opinion i like jar jar binks

  • @alistairsimpson1269
    @alistairsimpson1269 4 года назад +6

    Rogue One was not shot on 35mm. It was shot on an Alexa and Alexa 65

  • @rosstee
    @rosstee 4 года назад +2

    Totally agree, not interested in the sequel trilogy (though I didn't mind The Force Awakens and bought that on blu-ray in the hope the other two would be better - they weren't). I have the original trilogy on blu-ray and happy with those, so will just try to get the prequels on blu-ray too. Rogue One was my favourite of the recent movies (and possibly my favourite Star Wars universe movie overall) as it felt like the original trilogy and had some good action and performances, so will get that on 4K. Only just found your channel and subscribed right away as you seem to share my preferences.

  • @nicholashartmann4525
    @nicholashartmann4525 4 года назад +1

    So my order of Star wars from best to not best (I don't want to say the w-word) is:
    1: Episode 6 and 4 (I can never decide)
    3: Episode 5 and 3 (again, can't decide)
    5: Episode 1
    6: Episode 2
    So I've gotta say that you saying that 4, 6 and 3 are the best transfers really makes me happy. I don't care about 2 that much (dunno why really) so I also don't care about the transfer as I'd likely only buy it to own the entire set and never watch it.
    I also really liked rogue one, definatelly not the same as the originals (but also not comparable imo) so I'm happy that turned out well. I think I'll buy the exact ones you have.

  • @markgriffith3076
    @markgriffith3076 23 дня назад

    Hi there....im a HUGE Star Wars fan (the same films you've listed, not the Disney crap apart from Rogue One) but I'm not overly tech savvy but thought this question I'm asking 4 years later might be valid.
    I've just bought a brand new 4k tv with obviously newer tech than what was around 4 years ago when you made this review. So my question is, would these 4k films look better on newer tvs with better upscalling and features like quantom dot technology? I hope my question makes sense and I'd love your feedback as im thinking about adding these 4k versions to my collection 🙌😊
    Thanks so much🙌😊

  • @LuisMendoza-pp9qi
    @LuisMendoza-pp9qi 2 года назад +1

    Well, I wish you should spend more time on the actual screen picture quality and detail and Not on the boxes or your personal opinion

  • @draketafoya3343
    @draketafoya3343 4 года назад

    Love the channel... What is your opinion on current Disney releases having reduced dynamic range when it comes to the soundtracks? I read other reviews where the volume needs to be turned up past reference.. Why does this occur? Thank you!

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      Without doing a bunch of research my guess is it has something to do with a lack of time spent on the atmos tracks they put in their releases. I've read people talk about it in forums and no one really knows why it is the case. I think honestly Dosney just rushes to get their stuff on 4K with atmos added and doesn't spend lots of time remixing the source to get what fans want/deserve.

  • @PlotagonDP36
    @PlotagonDP36 4 года назад +1

    If I only have a blu ray player and Since I’m pretty picky on loving great picture quality and Bonus features, is it worth buying the 4Ks (I only want the blu rays abs the bonus discs) or the Fox 2011 set?

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      They have the same releases with bluray/DVD as well which will include all the extras

    • @PlotagonDP36
      @PlotagonDP36 4 года назад

      TheBluReview so 4K to go?

    • @bigdeckdaddy11
      @bigdeckdaddy11 4 года назад

      PlotagonDP 36 the 4k movies come with Blu Ray discs

    • @leaphardotnet
      @leaphardotnet 4 года назад

      the blureview is only about packaging, the guy don't even own a tv...

  • @thesithempire1348
    @thesithempire1348 4 года назад +2

    It's not the last time--for good or ill. No doubt in 5 years, or at the next anniversary, we'll see another box set with a new 4k transfer and the documentaries, special features, and deleted scenes not included in this set. What would be *really* nice would be if Disney created extended editions of the six (or nine for those of you who include the ST) films. That would be worth an upgrade. Additionally, Rick McCallum had announced many years ago that they'd created 100 hours of documentaries on the saga. This was said during the same announcement that mentioned the uncovering of the dailies, which included entire shot sequences for the films that hadn't been seen by anyone except the original editors, which they *also* wanted to release in a future box set.

  • @808physicalmedia9
    @808physicalmedia9 4 года назад +9

    Great "Star Wars" 4k reviews & It's very disappointing that Disney's didn't give the Prequels a True Native 4k Upgrade! Why?

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +9

      Thanks Vincent! Since the Prequels were shot digitally and the special effects were rendered in 2K, it isnt really possible to give them native 4k transfers. You still see that occur with new movies like the marvel movies. The studios would have to re-render the CGI in 4K which would be extremely costly and wouldnt make sense for them to do at this time.

    • @Theomite
      @Theomite 4 года назад

      I didn't consider this, but thanks for reminding me about it. I can't imagine anything being done about it though.

    • @Robin_Glader
      @Robin_Glader 4 года назад +1

      AOTC and ROTS were also shot entierly in 1080p. So there exits no 4K source material. TPM was shot mostly on 35mm, some scenes were shot digitally.

    • @leaphardotnet
      @leaphardotnet 4 года назад

      yes, but it's starwars, a rerender of all the cgi and mastering wouldn't cost that much in 2020, and disney have the cash they just made many billions with the shitty sequels....

  • @danielrudolph3252
    @danielrudolph3252 4 года назад +1

    I have the best buy exclusive box set of the saga. The 4k is solid, not too much to boast about, though I wish there was. The fact that we only have the special editions in 4k is disappointting.

  • @jimcameron1234
    @jimcameron1234 4 года назад +1

    Attention: SW Episode 1 was shot on Film not Digital (SONY 1080p camera) unlike Episode 2 + 3!

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      Yes, but all of the seens that required VFX (which were nearly all of them) were finished with a 2K DI which doesn't allow them to do anything but upscale the old transfer

    • @jimcameron1234
      @jimcameron1234 4 года назад

      @@theblureview1083 Ok but 2K DI like 2 + 3 on UHD anyway

  • @Theomite
    @Theomite 4 года назад

    Is there a list of the supplementary material that is no longer available that was once on DVD back in the day? There should be one so we can all hunt them down online or RUclips for rips since we can't count on Di$ney to do the right thing.

  • @colemanpaulini4959
    @colemanpaulini4959 4 года назад +2

    Your 4K shelf would look so much better if you got individual slips instead of box sets like the first 4 dceu box set you have and the Jason bourne, mission impossible, and mad max fury road 4K slip is beautiful instead of the high octane set

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +2

      You're absolutely right! Unfortunately with so many movies always coming out I tend to prioritize new titles as opposed to splitting up box sets for individual releases simply due to cost. In a perfect world I'd have all individual releases with slips (like the daniel craig bond set that was recently released)

  • @stoltobot
    @stoltobot 4 года назад +2

    I was most curious how the non-film prequels would turn out. I’m sure if George could get his way he would just remake and re-render all the assets, which would be cool. Along with a thorough reworking though you would be bound to get a little Macklunkey or what have you so you would need to take the bad with the good I suppose.

  • @CraigBickerstaff
    @CraigBickerstaff 4 года назад +1

    I think the extensive DNR is a result of them being intended for a 3D release, George had planned to put them all out in cinemas again in 3D but that all came to a halt after George sold to Disney. I've noticed that all these "remastered" films that came alongside a 3D release all have heavy DNR. Terminator 2, Predator, Jurrasic Park. I think the only thing Disney, or rather Lucasfilm did with the movies is Color Grade them for HDR. Rogue One wasn't shot on 35mm film, it was shot on the Alexa 65 which is a 6k camera.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      I have heard that about the DNR and the 3D intent by Lucas, it would make sense. Didn't know about the 6K camera for Rogue one. It's definitely an extremely good looking picture quality

  • @FSUSean2112
    @FSUSean2112 4 года назад +1

    I'm sticking with the individual releases I would love the box set but $350. I've got one through five I do plan on getting rogue one because it fits into the storyline between three and four, I love the artwork the holographic look on every cover. My favorites were 1-3. I will get the sequels 7 8 and 9 but I am debating to get nine at all because of the bullshit that happens. But I'll be getting them all because I love Star wars and I want all the movies.

  • @andrewattenboroughtwothumb4697
    @andrewattenboroughtwothumb4697 3 года назад +1

    glad that I picked them up in 4K last year except for the sequel trilogy movies but rogue one was great but not a fan of solo

  • @samspeaks2016
    @samspeaks2016 5 месяцев назад

    I agree completely with every point you made on the actual series.

  • @frankbizzoco1954
    @frankbizzoco1954 2 года назад +1

    I would probably buy the prequel trilogy on 4k. But if you havnt already, try to get a hold of Harmy's Despecialized, or 4k77 and 83. That is a direct 4k scan of the 35mm negatives and its amazing. There are DNR. and no DNR versions. No DNR of 4k77 is the closest thing you will ever get to how the movie actually looked in 1977. Its like hearing the little scratches on a vinyl record. I did like Rogue One and Solo. But if I never watch the Sequel Trilogy again, it'll be too soon.

    • @millabasset1710
      @millabasset1710 2 года назад

      It's an ignorant comment, because you really do overestimate how old film used to look. Star Wars in 1977 was probably hovering around 720p quality, not to mention film traveled constantly, so it degraded much faster. Harmy is just a butt hurt loser that hates the fact George Lucas had the right to change his versions, funny since the projects Harmy did were altering the movies to a subjective version that he remembers.

    • @LubbockBabesFan
      @LubbockBabesFan 5 месяцев назад

      @@millabasset1710 🤔

  • @jasonkoestner4630
    @jasonkoestner4630 4 года назад +14

    I'll stick with my starwars 4k 77 uhd the way it's meant to be seen the original special edition bs

  • @darthhideous9084
    @darthhideous9084 4 года назад +1

    Do these original trilogy discs have Lucas' 2004 edits, such as changing Boba's voice in V, Christenson's inclusion in VI, and all the CGI nonsense in IV?

    • @alvarogiraldezcea8561
      @alvarogiraldezcea8561 3 года назад

      Yes, they do. There is unfortunately no legal way to watch the theatrical cuts on anything better than an upscaled Laserdisc (included on the original DVD release).
      There are, however, HD fan-restorations of the original trilogy called Harmy's Despecialized Editions and a 4K fan-restoration of A New Hope called 4K77, you should look into them.

  • @shanerod9708
    @shanerod9708 4 года назад +3

    New subscriber and agree the saga ends with Return of the Jedi. Thank u for the review.

  • @wesleydaniel2196
    @wesleydaniel2196 4 года назад

    Should I get them on 4K if I already have the blu rays?

  • @mr.president8862
    @mr.president8862 4 года назад +2

    I have all 9 movies in 4k and an OLED 2020 edition, it's worth all the money! VHS and DVD is dead, cause it's really bad quality xD

  • @kazazel1899
    @kazazel1899 3 года назад +1

    I guess I’ll go only for 4, 5 and 6 in 4k. Thx for the review.

  • @SoapNugget
    @SoapNugget 4 года назад +1

    The Original 3 are the only ones I am for sure on getting still thinking about the prequels but I probably will

  • @McFrozenNuggets
    @McFrozenNuggets 2 года назад +1

    Exactly what I plan on getting.

  • @FranklinPinho
    @FranklinPinho 4 года назад +1

    Thanks for the reviews. Phantom Menace was shot in 35 mm and Rogue one 4k.

    • @scottwallace1
      @scottwallace1 4 года назад +2

      Rogue One used the Arri 65, actually a 6K format. They used 1970’s lenses to help create an older film look to better match up to Ep. IV.

  • @stephensdygert7600
    @stephensdygert7600 4 года назад +5

    Return of the Jedi was perfect! A great 4k transfer. Revenge of the Sith was excellent in 4k. My only criticism. No dolby vision. Disney is too cheap to pay licensing fees to dolby labs.

    • @markstanbrook5578
      @markstanbrook5578 4 года назад

      Not too cheap to do so - after all they pay for Dolby digital, Dolby atmos etc. Dolby vision is too young and in a war with HDR-10. Once one of them wins or most TV manufacturers support both, media will follow.

    • @wonderfulwookiee6443
      @wonderfulwookiee6443 4 года назад

      Did Return of the Jedi have "special edition" changes? Then its not perfect.

  • @nicholasdickens2801
    @nicholasdickens2801 4 года назад +3

    Short answer - No.
    Long answer, it’s not 4K quality. The OT was shot on terrible quality film stock and hasn’t been really well restored. Unlike Jaws that’s had numerous repairs and restorations.
    The PT apart from The Phantom Menace was all shot digitally so you’re only getting Blu-ray quality. Same for the sequel trilogy. The Phantom Menace was shot on film but the digital effects like most films is shot in standard HD - 1080 Blu-ray quality.
    So, none of them are worth it. The versions on Disney+ have the Dolby Atmos sound, not sure if these do. Although have LFL messed with soundtrack again. So beyond a better (technically) Soundtrack what’s the point of upgrading.
    Also, it’s Disney, and Lucasfilm - you’ll rarely if ever now get a definitive version from them.
    I’ve heard the upgrading, artefacts, edge enhancement is all a bit horrible.
    All tell-tell signs the actual film hasn’t been restored, and that their are other factors. Definitely not worth getting. Now if it were a definitive set I’d maybe get it. Also it’ll be the newer 1997+ cuts.
    But if you don’t have them the BD box set is a good buy.

    • @prich0382
      @prich0382 4 года назад

      Analogue film can easily be converted into a high digital resolution buddy. Go learn about it, there are many examples of old films restored and converted to 1080p or 4K

  • @Dragnet5
    @Dragnet5 4 года назад +9

    No theatrical versions ha

  • @prich0382
    @prich0382 4 года назад

    Episode 2 and 3 will not be true 4K as they were filmed in Digital 1080p, Episode 1 was on film so that should be able to scale nicely as will Episodes 4, 5 and 6

    • @Brandon.S.Brooker
      @Brandon.S.Brooker 3 года назад

      Episode 1 had CG in nearly every shot so they did a 2K intermediate

  • @davidsal28
    @davidsal28 3 года назад +1

    TPM was shot on film.

  • @DarthPatty421
    @DarthPatty421 4 года назад

    Do any if y’all think Disney will re-release Solo, The Last Jedi, and Rise of Skywalker with the covers to match these?

    • @bazzzzz6175
      @bazzzzz6175 4 года назад

      Who cares? They're all shite!

    • @MatheMachtSpaß
      @MatheMachtSpaß 4 года назад

      In Germany we have all Star Wars Movies except TROS with the new cover artworks.
      I'm sure it will follow in a few months when everybody already spent money on the current TROS release, so they can force the enthusiasts to buy twice.

  • @TheGodKingOfMusic
    @TheGodKingOfMusic 4 месяца назад

    Rogue One is made canon by the opening crawl of A New Hope so it should count

  • @OUTWOZ
    @OUTWOZ Год назад

    Is the disc art work 4k pics?

  • @joenesvick7043
    @joenesvick7043 4 года назад

    I don't have 4K player, do I need to get one or will they release regular blu rays (again). It may have maclunkey, but the lightsaber colour is finally correct

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      They have blu ray releases that came out last year that have the same blu discs. Otherwise yes you'd have to have a 4k player.

    • @joenesvick7043
      @joenesvick7043 4 года назад

      @@theblureview1083 it's so odd they messed up the lightsaber colour, I guess I need to upgrade again

    • @Robin_Glader
      @Robin_Glader 4 года назад

      These new 4K editions come with a regular blu-ray sourced from the new masters. In some regions they have even been released on their own. Not in the states though.

    • @joenesvick7043
      @joenesvick7043 4 года назад +1

      @@Robin_Glader I gave in and got a 4K player. Tested the Episode 4 blu ray to double check, and yes you're correct Greeso says maclunkey so now I have better regular blu rays for a situation like when I need to fly with my portable blu ray player

  • @leonardvicari2857
    @leonardvicari2857 2 месяца назад

    To much grain reduction disney makes it to smooth

  • @alcarbo8613
    @alcarbo8613 3 года назад

    Actually the Original Trilogy was shot on 70mm film, also I don’t like the fact the Box’s don’t include episode number it’s so stupid

  • @kascnef
    @kascnef 4 года назад +1

    I already own them on dvd bluray and the trilogy special edition on vhs as well as phantom menace on vhs. Digital is rogue one as well as disney trilogy. I've seen the Disney plus version of new hope and I'm ok with that.

  • @jasonmendonca6061
    @jasonmendonca6061 7 месяцев назад

    I picked up Revenge of the Sith yesterday and I gotta say the Atmos soundtrack was excellent

  • @id104335409
    @id104335409 2 года назад +1

    There is a sequel trilogy???
    Never heard of it!!!
    I'm sure it doesn't exist!

  • @D10MAESE
    @D10MAESE 4 года назад +1

    Where buy your 4k edition, audio in spanish ??? Thank you

    • @samugarrido1998
      @samugarrido1998 4 года назад

      Encontraste información? A mi me interesa el episodio 3 :(

    • @D10MAESE
      @D10MAESE 4 года назад

      @@samugarrido1998 por ahora no he tenido mucho tiempo para mirarlo mejor. Si lo busco y lo encuentro te escribo por aquí.

    • @samugarrido1998
      @samugarrido1998 4 года назад

      @@D10MAESE encontraste algo?

  • @xNightHawk32
    @xNightHawk32 4 года назад

    So my question, since these versions contain Blu-ray versions as well. Are these blurays the same as the prior blurays released?
    Lastly, do you recommend a purchase?

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      Yes same as the prior Disney blu ray releases last year. If you're a star wars fan then yes I'd say snag them. If you're only casually interested and already own the Blus then I'd say either pass on them or just get episodes 3-6 and pass on 1 & 2. End of the day, they're all going to be at least marginally better than the blus its just up to you if that slight increase is worth the cost. If I had to do it again I'd still buy all of them if that helps

    • @xNightHawk32
      @xNightHawk32 4 года назад

      TheBluReview that does help, thank you. I was initially on the fence because the films are available on Disney+

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      I would say the physical 4ks are going to look fairly significantly better than streaming.

    • @xNightHawk32
      @xNightHawk32 4 года назад

      TheBluReview thank you again. That’s actually really helpful and good to know. Thank you. I think I will get them 😊 - You cut to the chase. I respect that. Thanks again

  • @kurthugger9107
    @kurthugger9107 3 года назад

    There are bonus discs in the box set

  • @johnstanowski9489
    @johnstanowski9489 3 года назад

    Very helpful review. I have all 7 of these sitting in my cart right now (also like you, none of the Disney sequels). Just wanted to check out some reviews because I'm concerned about the prequels. I almost took them out of my cart while you were talking about Attack of the Clones, but now I'm really curious about Revenge of the Sith.

  • @milanbaros2005
    @milanbaros2005 6 месяцев назад

    Original Trilogy, and Rogue One are all I really need. The rest is fluff. OG Star Wars fan here.

  • @mattikunnas1962
    @mattikunnas1962 4 года назад +5

    Your canon theory rocks!

  • @keanueraine
    @keanueraine 4 года назад

    Ok maybe some one here can answer this one for me.
    If the prequels were shot with a maximum resolution of 2k for VFX, and the standard blu-ray was down-scaled to 1080p from 2k, shouldn't the 2k master up-scaled to 4k look better as there is still information gained from the 2k that the 1080p downscale lost? I get just taking the 1080p 2k DI and up scaling it to 4k wouldn't amount to much gain, but the 2k source up-scaled to 4k should be better.
    What am I missing here?
    Edit: sentence restructured. Question reorganized.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      It does look better, that's what I said in the video. I'm not sure I get your question? You're completely right with everything you said. It does look better than the blu ray, but IMO it has the least beneficial upgrade and has some issues with the DNR

    • @keanueraine
      @keanueraine 4 года назад +1

      @@theblureview1083 Thanks for the reply. Sometimes I'm just a bit slow on the get up. I just wanted to make sure what I thought was matching with what I heard.
      Your video was great by the way...you got a sub out of me.

    • @markstanbrook5578
      @markstanbrook5578 4 года назад +1

      2k IS 1080p. 2k, 4K, 5k e are the horizontal resolutions. 1080, 1440, 2160 etc are the vertical resolutions. The CGI was rendered in the Blu-Ray’s native resolution. 1080p/2k. Upscaling 2k to 4K requires inventing 75% of the new pixels which technology is quite good at but not perfect by far.

  • @davebrabans3532
    @davebrabans3532 4 года назад

    Very unfortunate (scandalous actually) that the 4K blu-ray are not available in Belgium with Dutch subtitles

  • @r520jr8
    @r520jr8 4 года назад +1

    Could I buy JUST the original trilogy or does it have to come with the prequels? Because I don’t wanna have to buy the prequels. It would just be a waste of money because I’ll never watch those

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      Sure, you could buy whatever ones you want!

    • @r520jr8
      @r520jr8 4 года назад

      TheBluReview oh cool. I didn’t understand if it was like a box set or individual movies

  • @theandrewkchannel34
    @theandrewkchannel34 3 года назад +1

    Already have a like for not liking the Sequel trilogy.

  • @davidseleznova3199
    @davidseleznova3199 4 года назад

    The last time, physical copies will be ever be released. ¿Because of the current means of production? Or because there is no interest in them?

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      I was speculating that this would be the last time star wars movies get a new physical release. I could surely be wrong but I doubt there is another physical format after 4k, but who knows!

    • @miguelrubiorincon3904
      @miguelrubiorincon3904 4 года назад

      Laserdisc will return ! you, ll see .

  • @bestbry1
    @bestbry1 4 года назад

    The packages are terrible. The discs come very close to each other, I hate it

  • @djCaliKev
    @djCaliKev 4 года назад +1

    Thanks for the review. I picked up 3 thru 6. I gotta say I appreciate the 4k transfers. Made all the films look Natural. Grain is there just very light. Of course it could be better but...its way better then what I expected. And...maybe its wishful thinking, but since Disney has the original theatrical cuts on 35mm and ran thru 4k with 16-bit color. I'm hoping they'll release them in a box set. Might be pricey tho

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      I would love it if we could get the originals.. although if I was a betting man we wont ever see them released as long as LucasFilm is in the hands of Disney.

    • @djCaliKev
      @djCaliKev 4 года назад

      @@theblureview1083 I mean Lucasfilm being the creator of the movies, what is their deal of not releasing them? I'll never understand it

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      Well it's not really the same company anymore, its Disney. LucasFilm by name only. Im sure they could do it, but that would require effort and money, and they likely don't think it's worth it. Disney (as of late) is about making lots of money and has proven to be less interested in doing things for different fan bases. Even huge successful things like the MCU get pretty quick physical releases without many bells or whistles.

    • @djCaliKev
      @djCaliKev 4 года назад +1

      @@theblureview1083 yea it looks that way. I honestly think they would've made more sales releasing the theatrical cuts. I know man people not buying these versions because they're the altered ones. Oh well, it is what it is

    • @lowe8194
      @lowe8194 4 года назад

      Dj Wolfville Disney can’t release the original cuts

  • @sootycat1601
    @sootycat1601 4 года назад

    do the blurays have Atmos..?

  • @TheSteve475
    @TheSteve475 4 года назад

    So I'm going to ask a simple question... Are the Star Wars films worth upgrading to 4K?

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      Tough to answer, depends on where you find the worth. Do they all look better than the blu rays, yes. Is the increase worth the expense.. up to you!

    • @adriannn3720
      @adriannn3720 3 года назад

      @@theblureview1083 What if I last owned them on DVD?

  • @ironaspect6850
    @ironaspect6850 4 года назад +2

    Just to let you know Phantom Menace was shot completely on 35mm film.

    • @PokemonBoy-de4jd
      @PokemonBoy-de4jd 4 года назад +1

      IRON ASPECT no it was not shot completely in film there were a few shots digital.

  • @irvinezekiel
    @irvinezekiel 4 года назад +1

    I gained a newfound disrespect for the prequel trilogy after recently rewatching all the movies in preparation for Rise of Skywalker. They still have cool moments but overall I think the sequel trilogy movies are better in my opinion. They’re definitely uneven but I just enjoy them more. I did grow up watching the prequels and remember going to watch Attack of the Clones several times in the theater but watching them now I just think they’re not that good. Good review though. I’ll probably eventually end up buying these to upgrade my 2011 set.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +1

      I'm glad you like the new ones! Certainly the quality of the movies from a production and dialog standpoint was worse with the prequels ill admit to that. I just thought they were a more faithful telling of a story set in the universe that George created, and the new ones just felt like a totally different thing to me.

    • @irvinezekiel
      @irvinezekiel 4 года назад

      TheBluReview I can see where your coming from. These new ones are very different but that’s also what I like. I definitely don’t hate the prequels they’re just less enjoyable for me.

  • @ginarae5739
    @ginarae5739 5 месяцев назад

    Notably, "Prequels did Fail in some areas" ..shows Jar Jar picture 😂.
    "LAST time we"ll get Star Wars physically..." Ironically on front of each episode "FIRST time on 4K" ..😊

  • @nolanjimenez772
    @nolanjimenez772 4 года назад

    If you don't use the digital codes I'm looking for the digital copies

  • @theblackesteyesthedevilseyes
    @theblackesteyesthedevilseyes 4 года назад +2

    Episode 6 looks awful, not worth the upgrade.
    Waxy and smooth, worse than the old Blu-ray.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      Definitely has signs of some DNR going on. In my opinion I think overall it still is the best it has looked, but if you really don't like that smoothing out then I completely understand!

  • @kingschessclub
    @kingschessclub 4 года назад +2

    With all of the buzz and circulation all around this saga, we deserve the very best of the best cream of the croppe!) and the journey continues!) #LucasJr.!) An inspired and empowered generation, etc.

  • @richrams4683
    @richrams4683 4 года назад

    Just finished the prequels, disney made no effort with attack of the clones at all, phantom Menance was quite shiny at times and Return of the sith was an easy job for them as it looked good anyways. Unfortunately the first 2 looked worse than the blueray at times.
    Im with you on the new disney horse dung movies. Jedi Poogu!!!

    • @richrams4683
      @richrams4683 4 года назад +1

      Oh just to add, Rouge One has fit into my saga nicely also. Fan from the Uk. 👍

    • @stevee6305
      @stevee6305 4 года назад

      Lucasfilm conducted the restoration and handed them to Disney prior to the sale - hence MACLUNKEY!

  • @thomasellis9608
    @thomasellis9608 Год назад

    Finn is the only character that I liked in the sequels

  • @yohinotyoshi5378
    @yohinotyoshi5378 3 месяца назад

    I actually really like Solo

  • @luckygames2558
    @luckygames2558 4 года назад

    What is worse guys, the prequels or the new trilogy?

    • @failedgrace2891
      @failedgrace2891 4 года назад

      Well, I watched all the prequels and stopped after the death of Akbar on The Last Jedi. Mind, I was once a huge Star Wars fan and I've seen three and a half Sharknado movies. I couldn't finish The last Jedi nor the desire to and absolutely no interest in Rise of Skywalker. Loved Rogue One though, and continually talk about how it was a great example of a movie set in the Star Wars universe without being like the main series in tone.

    • @longislandhaunter5816
      @longislandhaunter5816 3 года назад +1

      New trilogy by far. Prequels are awesome

  • @meneerjansen00
    @meneerjansen00 4 года назад +3

    The only way to watch the Orig. Trilogy is Harmy's despecialized version. Why? Just look at the colors. On Lucasfilm's version Leia looks like she has made up by a child (too red) on Harmy's version she looks like a grown woman. Same thing for C3-PO: he has a constant red glow that's not there - and _should_ not be there - in Harmy's version. Don't drool over sharpess. That disappears when you're 1 meter away from your TV. The completely ruined colors, however, do not.

  • @texranger1012
    @texranger1012 4 года назад

    I would love to have these for my birthday in a month in a half

  • @samuel-wankenobi
    @samuel-wankenobi 3 года назад +1

    I'm not getting this because I'm just as happy with the fan 4k77 preservation for my star wars watching

    • @Webhead123
      @Webhead123 3 года назад

      I agree. I just wish I knew how to get a copy of 4K77 on a UHD disc. My computer chugs when I try running 4K77 (because the file size) and I just wanna watch the original films on my home theater set-up.

    • @samuel-wankenobi
      @samuel-wankenobi 3 года назад

      @@Webhead123 it works on most TVs if you have a 1tb hard drive

  • @ironaspect6850
    @ironaspect6850 4 года назад

    There may have been a couple elements shot digitally for fx, however

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад

      Yeah I misspoke. Everything real was shot on film, but it everything with special effects (which is probably more than not) was all finished at 2K digitally

  • @amysarg
    @amysarg 4 года назад

    Rogue One was shot digitally

  • @scottdavis_34
    @scottdavis_34 4 года назад +4

    Good review. I own the The Complete Saga blu ray set but I went ahead and picked these up as well. Like yourself, I skipped the Sequel Trilogy. I have no desire to own those and as far as I’m concerned the Skywalker story is six movies. The sequel trilogy is just bad fan fiction. The only thing I enjoyed from those was more John Williams music.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +3

      Well said. Yeah I'm just going to pretend they don't exist!

  • @thomashenry5952
    @thomashenry5952 4 года назад

    I have the Blu-ray and special editions and the theater versions from harmony awesome I love return of the Jedi and I have the Vcds to

  • @Jxworldwidemusic
    @Jxworldwidemusic 4 года назад

    I bought the Originals and two of the prequels 4Ks. Attack Of The Clones was a terrible transfer and wished I'd saved my money. I actually can't get over how bad Natalie Portman was in this but the dialogue was god awful, still C3P0 managed to get a few funny moments so I believe Anthony Daniels would go to Lucas and say "Hmm I don't think so", so who knows what happened.

  • @texranger1012
    @texranger1012 4 года назад

    I would love to have that for my birthday this year

    • @Fusion991
      @Fusion991 3 года назад

      Mmmmm okay daddy

  • @texranger1012
    @texranger1012 3 года назад

    I think I would get the box set

  • @randybradley4151
    @randybradley4151 4 года назад

    Both these and the box set re-release on blu-ray are terrible in most parts. Here's hoping Disney will take out the CGI additions that Lucas made and just remaster the original movies. Rogue One is a stellar movie in terms of picture quality, HDR and sound though definitely worth having the 4K version.

    • @lawrencejelsma8118
      @lawrencejelsma8118 4 года назад

      Someone answered why theatrical pre-1996 Star Wars releases were not Disney owned. The Disney corporation took over the Prequels and Original Trilogy but could not profit from anything shown to be a rights given to George Lucas. If Disney invests money in 1977-1983 movies and what they did vs 1996-2013 efforts then copyrighted courts would award George Lucas this rights!

  • @Shavenerd53119
    @Shavenerd53119 4 года назад +1

    No, it’s on Disney +

  • @charlieburrows7490
    @charlieburrows7490 4 года назад

    great, although in the UK the only option is to buy on ebay for £40 each or to get it imported...or pay £199 to Disney for a special edition saga boxset...which I can't do because the sequel trilogy sucked. I just don't want those...they killed it for me. So I'm sticking with the originals only..but would love the 4k discs...just can't buy them easily over here.

    • @theblureview1083
      @theblureview1083  4 года назад +3

      Yeah that's unfortunate that they're hard to find for a decent price over there :( I completely agree about the sequels, I'd love to have a cool box set but I'm definitely not going to ever buy the sequels

  • @richardbutton1179
    @richardbutton1179 4 года назад

    I'll just stick to my blue rays

  • @ryanwaasdorp
    @ryanwaasdorp 4 года назад +12

    God the sequels were awful.

  • @raulzavala9061
    @raulzavala9061 3 года назад

    I just bought the original trilogy separately, I do not care for the prequels on 4k.