Bro I didn't have time to see the full video which is of 48 minutes on this channel... Can you please tell me what he basically discovered ?? What's that secret of indus valley ??
Thanks for the comment. Then there are those whom type elaborate "emotional" comments attempting to refute a research they have no nut-and-bolt of an idea of !
@@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too. This is Big. but ML and DL models show Indo-European terms NOT Dravidian. If confirmed more. this Could change histroy.
Government of India should pay immediate attention and fund further research in this direction. Establishing the truth in this area can puncture many propaganda theories and conspiracies especially the mythical North South divide. All sanatani organisations should also highlight these findings.....the whole academia is mostly compromised
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
Correct 👍 North - South, Aryan - Dravidian divide rubbish theory has already been exposed....But this work should be recognized and encouraged by government of India Jai Bharat 👍
Hey, are you talking about puncturing the propaganda of Sun dynasty descendants and Moon dynasty descendants because celestial bodies do not give birth to humans. Hey, And what about the propaganda of Hanuman, because no such species exist which can fly larger amount of distance without wings and no to forget superpowers like lifting a mountain and carrying it. First talk about the above ridiculousness before you actually call out current scientific consensus lmao
@@patsub south indians don't call themselves dravidian. Infact it's an alien word for us. This dravidian thing came from tamilnadu and made popular by mslims, christians , pakistanis and Bangladeshis. On twitter a page named dravidian... The user was found to be a Bangladeshi. We kannadigas love sanskrit and tamil both. We don't have identity called dravida . It's popular in internet only . Our governments kept on pushing these theories instead of shtting them up. Now BJP is also doing nothing because they are scared that they will not get votes in South india
Indian already has an ancient timeline and there's never been any dispute around it. Deciphering an ancient script doesn't erase or invent archaeological evidence. I don't understand this need to swallow the lie from a certain political spectrum that only they are uncovering history, when that has always been uncovered and open to see for ages now.
@@sandyqbg The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script First time and Completely Matches all Symbols. You don't have any knowledge and blabbering Nonsense.
@@sandyqbg What type of F00l are you? For you people anything that supports india is fake. THERE is no political Involvement in this. This is done by ML and along human sciences Scholars.
@Englishlearno-om6mt If you don't know what you're yapping on about, I'd suggest that you keep quiet and let people who know do the talking. Just throwing around terms like ML, DL, Linear models doesn't make you seem smart, just exposes that you're a wannabe. Most unknown languages scripts aren't deciphered with these models. If they've been deciphered, then image and language models are used to scale further deciphering. And any ML or DL model is only as good as the learning data it is fed. And if Mr Yajnadevam had fed it fictional translations, then it will spit out more fictional translations. And given the lack of a reproducible documentation of his method, the poor matching between the symbology and the Sanskrit verses from his photos and even contradictory claims by Mr Yajnadevam himself on whether it is a logographic or syllabilic writing system merely casts more shadow on the credibility of it. However, as one end of the political spectrum has clearly shown, it doesn't really care for logic or evidence or even truth, as long as their ideology is being mollycoddled. And therefore just one statement that IVC is sanskrit is more than enough for the purpose the claim is being made.
The best part of studying civilizations older than 8000 BCE is that the Europeans had not emerged from the North. This is why West is shy about dealing with Indus. You can also see the original way Indians behaved before 300 years of Anglo Colonization. How brilliant & business savvy they were. Indians have always made money with trade, without colonization. And these Indians were same as the Indians today, the only thing that changed was behaviour under colonization, as Indians had to survive the Anglos. Simply fascinating.
This should be included in school curriculum, since it is mathematically proven now. Indus, harappa civilization was extension of our hindu Civilization.
Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
I read these. What's shocking is. This research is supported by linear decipherment. Which is used to decipher most ancient scripts and unknown scripts. Also this also matched with machine learning models and with Z. Linear for the first time.
Indus valley sculpture art still exist . The 4000 years old sculpture making process passed on to generation . Even today in many parts of India people are still using that ancient Lost -wax casting technique called Dhokra art. The communities who are making the Dhokra sculpture are Gonds , Dhurwas , Jhera and Khond . These communities speak ancient languages like Parji , Gondi , Kuvi , Kuyi as their mother tongue . So please do researches on these languages of Chhattisgarh , Odisha and Madhya Pradesh. Another language which is close to these languages is Kurukh
Very compelling... i approach this woth a lot of scepticism and i dont k ow if his thesis is right...but it sounds extremely honest and brings a new approach ...
Given how similar Russian and even more so Lithuanian to Sanskrit...I am a bit worried they (Western linguists and archaeologists who interpret findings through the lens of Judeo-Christian timelines) will say we are a bunch of Lithuanians or Russians who just lost our way enroute to Australia and ended up in India.
This is one of the many persons who have broken the Indus script. If this is Sanskrit 4000+ years back, then next after such a long time we find a primitive authenticated Sanskrit Rig Veda text from the year 1460 CE at the Bhandarkar Research Institute
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@naveenjayapal2331 Yea, I just kind of curios wanting to know their thought process of either being biasely ignorant or what.. Remember this; most of "these groups "still believing" that Marathas are the father of Indian Navy historically whereas Rest-of-World have "different opinion" on that.
@@gabrielemmanuel36maybe both the people of Indus valley & keezhadi spoke sanskirit or some short of indo aryan language. Do you have any proof that people of keezhadi spoke Dravidian language
@@switchblade970 mittanis were a straight vedic sanskrit speaking/writing people of indic civilisation! also much, much later than what is being discussed here. and what have sinthasta people got to do with mittanis anyways?
@@brachisaurous so did Aryans from india traveled to create sinhastha and mittani culture ?? Becoz presence of Aryans can only dated back to 1500bce but sinhastha and mittani culture are atleast 1000 years older than vedic culture
Some people Literally Don't have basic knowledge. And this is about Research by MIT and other major Scholars there. And Some Are Connecting this to Caste And Poltics. F00lish. This is a Great research and has Potential 🎉
Damn, The Machine learning and Linear code matches Linear Z too. This is definingly has great potential. Take this to archeological reviews and fund this
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@@gabrielemmanuel36 Those symbols were taken to Keezadi by Indus migrants. Most Tamils are genetically closer to Andamanese Hunter Gatherers than to the Iran_Nmaxxed Indus people.
@@gabrielemmanuel36 Keezhadi finds are just graffiti, not language. Only single symbols have been found and not even one word of IVC script or anything that looks like IVC script.
That was awesome. This episode is like just scratching the surface. What Yagnadevam brings to the table is deduction based on a proven methodology of scientific study. Even if the deductions turn out to be inaccurate one cannot fault the approach. He tried to minimize the technical jargon and present it in a more lucid manner but I feel he should come out with a more in-depth session where he can present the technical details as well as the assumptions drawn from them. The references that he quoted about the Dhruva Nakshatra in Vishnupuram and the Vedic alter alignment in Brahmanas are factual evidences that are verifiable and indisputable, going by that as an indicative metric one can say Yagnavedam has put in extensive efforts to arrive at his interpretations. What really bothers me is the fact that this is not getting the kind of coverage in the mass media which it deserves. Looking for to an extensive, in-depth and insightful episode soon. Anand Narismhan thank you for an engrossing podcast, bring out the next at the earliest.
. TAMILIANS beliveing anything Rhat waa told to them. These people should study basics. Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
Sameway, you guys should also know that the oldest inscription of sanskrit found in india is 100 BCE. Tamil's oldest inscription belongs to 600 BCE.Even language like Pali is older than sanskrit. Don't just say your own theories like rig Veda written in 5000 , 6000 BCE without evidence. These are all mere constructs without evidence. If we say some references to tamil's age from ancient tamil text, it seems to be mere theories for you . But you can say whatever you wanted without evidence.
@@kavi3483 While the oldest known Sanskrit inscriptions may date to around 100 BCE, Sanskrit was traditionally preserved through a highly sophisticated oral tradition, which predates written inscriptions by many centuries. This makes comparing Sanskrit’s age based solely on inscriptions misleading. Sanskrit was later adapted into multiple regional scripts, including Brahmi, Kharosthi, Grantha, Devanagari, and others, reflecting its widespread influence. The claim that Pali is older than Sanskrit is incorrect, as Vedic Sanskrit-the language of the Rigveda-predates Pali by several centuries. Similarly, while the Tamil-Brahmi script has inscriptions from around 600 BCE, Vedic Sanskrit’s oral tradition dates back to at least 1500 BCE, with scholarly consensus placing the Rigveda in this period based on linguistic, cultural, and comparative evidence. Lastly, the recent claims suggest it has been deciphered as Sanskrit. Meanwhile peer-reviewed validation & consensus is in process. Thus, while Tamil inscriptions are indeed ancient, the antiquity of Sanskrit, particularly its oral tradition, is well-supported by historical evidence and remains one of the oldest in the world.
@@kavi3483tamil oldest inscription in 600 BCE where did you find it. Inscription writing isn't indian tradition. It was introduced by Mauryans. Mauryans didn't control south india. Where did you got this 600 BCE old Tamil inscription???
Amazing work!!! Request to all the people commenting positively or negatively, please take the effort of reading the paper. Remember, in science or in history, when you see proof against your belief, you change your belief, not the other way around. Having said that, please also note that this always is an evolving process. The author has certainly achived a major milestone in our journey to the past, but that will not 'decipher' entire Indus-Saraswati scripts nor it will be the final word on this topic (hopefully, it will not be and more people try to solve this with their own thought process)
I read these. What's shocking is. This research is supported by linear decipherment. Which is used to decipher most ancient scripts and unknown scripts. Also this also matched with machine learning models and with Z. Linear for the first time.
Indus script is not using Mathra system. It is a script older than languages using Indian Mathra system. Trading seals of Indus trading businesses could just be logos. So, researchers need to take their time, not to mix up Indus company logos with actual script. Indus was closely linked with Egypt, via trade as well as China. This was before Europeans emerged up North.
Logos do refers to some message and there is brahmi script which tends to be the modern version of that time the only thing indus script was never been deciphered was the agenda that put forward by europeans
Tamilians in comment section. Literally beleive aryan Invasion theory which was Disapproved. And Official Research or Archeologist said There is Tamil in Indus valley. Tamils create Fake myths for themselfs. Also Dravidan is an Hypothetical Reconstructed family which is not a Race or single Language
@@PerumPalli nonsense.. Oldest langauge would be Hunter-gatherer Language. Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. No Anthropological..department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. DRAVIDIAN is not race or Language. it is Reconstructed language FAMILY. thats all... only tamilians say Sar we oldest" "Nobody is greater thean tamil. just EGOISTIC people
@@allareone1947 *Who Said We are only the Greatest rest all are Dumbass, Hunter Gatherers Spoke Tamil, Do u Sanskrit guy's have Proof for Sanskrit older that 1 st Century AD no right*
Could like to inquire whether it has been accepted by International archeological society, like the Heiroglyps script of Egypt and the cuneiform script of Mesopotamia.
He did not decipher the Indus Valley script with Sanskrit, but he's trying to prove Tamil words which have already been deciphered by comparison with Indus script as Sanskrit words.
Sanskrit was traditionally preserved through a highly sophisticated oral tradition (पाठन via पाठशाला) that predates written inscriptions by many centuries. This makes comparing Sanskrit’s age based solely on inscriptions misleading. Over time, Sanskrit was adapted into multiple regional scripts, including Brahmi, Kharosthi, Grantha, and Devanagari, reflecting its widespread influence across the subcontinent. The claim that Pali is older than Sanskrit is incorrect, as Vedic Sanskrit-the language of the Rigveda-predates Pali by several centuries. Similarly, while the Tamil-Brahmi script has inscriptions from around 600 BCE, Vedic Sanskrit’s oral tradition dates back to at least 1500 BCE. Scholarly consensus places the Rigveda in this period based on linguistic, cultural, and comparative evidence. There are also recent claims suggesting that the Indus Valley script may have been deciphered as Sanskrit, although peer-reviewed validation and scholarly consensus on this are still in progress. While intriguing, this theory remains speculative until further substantiated. Notably, we have an authenticated Rigveda manuscript from the year 1460 CE at the Bhandarkar Research Institute, which offers a historically significant record of the text and supports the continuity of Vedic Sanskrit’s tradition. In conclusion, while Tamil inscriptions are indeed ancient, the antiquity of Sanskrit, particularly its oral tradition, is well-supported by historical evidence, making it one of the oldest continuous languages in the world.
1) Indus Script is Logo-Syllabic, not Abugida. It have some pictographs. Their are no repeated pattern of strokes in basic signs of Indus Script, whereas we see same diactritic vowel pattern is used to write different consonants in Brahmi Script. 2) He used one sign value for 10 different signs, which is not logical. Some of them are clear depiction of animal. 3) The signs of Brahmi Script which he idenfied as Indus signs are not even look similar in most cases.
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@gabrielmanuel, Indus Valley symbols are common all over India including loacations in North India in locations in North India of years older than Keezhadi. Plus some of the people genetically closest to the Rakhigarhi gene samples are Tamil Brahmins who have a clear Vedic origin
@raghavantheerthagiri7888 Rakhigarhi cropse gene DNA similar to Tamil Brahmin?!? Seriously?!? Not Irula tribes?!? Are there clear proof stating them of clear Vedic origin?!? Please be factual rather than jumping with assumptions..
The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script First time and Completely Matches all Symbols. You don't have any knowledge and blabbering Nonsense.
@@gabrielemmanuel36 All you need to do is just check genetic studies The only people with over 50% Indus Valley ancestry in South India are the Brahmins with a few upper castes like Nairs, Bunts, Vellamas having around 50% Most of the rest are predominantly AASI And yes Brahmins are Vedi with most South Indian Brahmins clustering with each other.
A study published in the American Journal of Human Genetics found that modern-day India is the result of a population mixture between two ancestral groups, including Ancestral North Indians (ANI) who are related to Europeans, Central Asians, Middle Easterners, and Caucasians.(Invaders can't claim Indus valley civilization)
First of all you do not even see what system the language uses. Indian languages today are MATHRA system languages, where symbols are used to change the sound of the alphabet in words. Does not matter how alphabet is shaped as different tribes tend to show their own individuality, so the shapes & direction of writing, etc will change to make an identity for the tribe. Now, everything from Hindi, Kannada, Tamil, Marathi, etc in India, Persian, Arabic, etc west of India & Khymer, Bali East of India are MATHRA system languages. This means these tribes originate from India.
Manas Jaiswal Indus Script shows similaity to Proto-Cuneiform Script, which was Pictogaphic/ Logogaphic. There are no traces to Abuguda type script in ancient world until brahmi Script.
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
Very dubious analysis. No horses found in the Indus Valley. If Indus language is the forerunner of Sanskrit it should be easy to connect the both. Not convincing.
Yes Aryans in Sintashta culture had raths and horses. The sintastha culture was around 2200 bce to 1900bce which coincides with later Harappan period. If Harappan were Aryans there should have been mentioning of horse indeed
Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script First time and Completely Matches all Symbols. You don't have any knowledge and blabbering Nonsense. This Research is also supported by MIT and human sciences Scholars
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@@gabrielemmanuel36 I wouldn't trust anything where the starting point is from standpoint of an emotional bias. Research should be conducted with a mental state where you keep aside your personal and Kinship related biases.
@@Divine_wave23 bro let me explain there where civilization in Mesopotamia and harappa before we Aryans came and started living near hindukush mountains then this aryans where divided into two branches Iranian Aryans and Us. Iraq also have Aryan ancestry but they are not closely related to us like iran. Aryans in iraq came at different time and by different route than us
some people are telling that Indus valley is Tamil. Literally NO evidence or official Report on that. no Internation or verified anthropological document on that. Tamils Literally Believe anything that is told to them. if you tell Dinosaurs Spoke it. they will believe it. even According to TAMIL NADU archeology department. oldest evidence of tamil itself is just 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE
Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
@@PerumPalli Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. No Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real. This research is supported by Linear models which are used to decipher most of the Ancient scripts. Also this Is supported by MIT and Human Sciences scholars. DRAVIDIAN is not race or Language. it is Reconstructed language FAMILY. thats all
नीचे जो हैडलाइन आ रहा है विज्ञापन के रूप में वह कुछ पढ़ने सुनते ही नहीं दे रहा है इतना ज्यादा डिस्टर्बिग है ऐसे वीडियो बनाने से क्या मतलब जो व्यक्ति देखने के बदले बंद कर दे
@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too.
Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
@@CHRS-ri5mf if you want to by an inscription then Sanskrit is not even 2000 years old. black pepper were found in Pharaoh Ramses II's mummy (1200BCE), and Akananooru 149 (tamil literature) mentions Yavanas (foreigners) trading wood for pepper, wood was abundant in Egypt and the only way of pepper in ancient times is tamizhagam (kerala+tamilnadu), so tamil must be spoken at that times. so, tamil is atleast 3300 years old. And even the tamilee inscription is FOUND IN EGYPT that means Tamils are the ones who traded with Egyptians. I will give you more like these around the world.
This is pure hindu nationalist nonsense. The Indus Valley Civilization predated the arrival of Sanskrit into the region and thus spoke Dravidian or Elamo-Dravidian which in present-day Iran founded the Elamite or Haltami culture and in Pakistan founded Meluhha or the Indus Valley Civilization which expanded into present day India, migrating along the coast until these people reached the very southern tip of India. Along the way they interbred with India's tribal/Austroloid (Munda) population however they retained being Dravidian in speech instead of Munda. To state that the language of Meluhha was Sanskrit is absolutely absurd. Sanskrit itself is loaded with Dravidian loan vocabulary and some even tribal Austroloid or Munda vocabulary. Hindu nationalists need to get their heads screwed on straight. It is becoming comical now.
Provide the evidence - reference/citation for this statement : "The Indus Valley Civilization predated the arrival of Sanskrit into the region..." . Also provide the specific examples from the language Sanskrutam (Sanskrit) which are "Dravidian" in origin. Additionally what is "Dravidian vocabulary" ? Is Dravidian a language ?
@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too. You don't know a Single thing about anthropology. learn some basics
Wonderful. Now could you please write a paper with repeatable evidence disproving Yajadevam's thesis and publish it in peer reviewed journal? It would greatly help
You Literally Don't know any basic knowledge. And this is about Research by MIT and other major Scholars there. And You Are Connecting this to Caste And Poltics. F00lish
For the Tamils who Never Touch some Anthropology and Archeology. Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE. No Archeological research said that Indus Valley belongs to Tamils or Dravidan. That is An Anthropological Suggestion and Never Was Confirmed. Tamils literally don't know Difference between a Theory and Approved Research
@@CHRS-ri5mfHaa haa haa... Sangi Sir, You have good ability to fool public. But In this Satya Yuga it will not work. ruclips.net/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/видео.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English. Prove like this. Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. You say Sanskrit is ancient and mother of languages.. haa haa.. How can the refined Prakrithm be older than original Prakrithm. Then you say Prakrithm is oldest and mother of languages. Then it is ok. But you won't tell for reasons you know only.. Be logic..
For the Tamils who Never Touch some Anthropology and Archeology. Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE. No Archeological research said that Indus Valley belongs to Tamils or Dravidan. That is An Anthropological Suggestion and Never Was Confirmed. Tamils literally don't know Difference between a Theory anf Approved Research
What's wrong in that ? If you don't agree provide rebuttals rather than vague statement because he is providing technical details for what he saying and why he is saying ? What's your logic to criticize . Without any logical reasoning you are just gibberish
@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too. YOU don't Know a Single Thing. Go play Games
who are you to Not argree with or agree with? This research is supported by Linear models which are used to decipher most of the Ancient scripts. Also this Is supported by MIT and Human Sciences scholars. So Yejana Devam Used Machine learning models, equations and other Scripts and mixed it with LINEAR model. making it advanced.
@@AjaryaRajput Person who did it Did not use Linear scrip and Did not Complete his Document Fully. Yejna devam said there Least 100s of Indus valley projects.
Good work. But unless peer reviewed, published in reputed international journals and accepted by the global scientific community to be authentic it will, sadly, remain one of the many similar claims made in the past.
Tamilians in comment section. Literally beleive aryan Invasion theory which was Disapproved. And Official Research or Archeologist said There is Tamil in Indus valley. Tamils create Fake myths for themselfs. Also Dravidan is an Hypothetical Reconstructed family which is not a Race or single Language
WTF ? When was it deciphered? In your imagination? No official Research said that Tamil is in Indus valley. No evidence. It an Archeological suggestion made to Reasearch
Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE. Tamils never Study Archeology and anthropology but Knows to Believe anything that's &hit
@@CHRS-ri5mf *Go to Keezhadi, Aadhichcha Nalluur, Kozhaththalai river Basin, Mayilaadum paarai, There are Iron, Steel which is 4000 yrs old, as u go deep Brahmi with Mixture of Indus Script, Still Further deep in Soil Wholesome Indus Script is in Pot Sheds, Y don't Gangetic Basic Has it*
The only reason we cannot decipher Harappan scripts because aryans came and they destroyed and demotivated everything related to Harappan and now this guy comes from nowhere and claims Harappan where sanskrit speaking and implies Harappan ppl were aryans. What a joke 😂😂. Does yajnadevam knows anything about history? He is computer programmer who solves cryptography from newspaper lol
FOR the people who tell he is NOT Genuine. This Research is Supported by Linear ML and Deep learning systems Combined with Anthropoidal Reseach. in MIT university and Human sciences Scholars. Un-educated people will have opinion like that
You don't any knowledge on History or science. F00l. Aryan Invasion theory is Already Disapproved. You are living in imagination. This the Reasearch is Supported by linear models which is used to Decipher many Scripts
@@CHRS-ri5mf the oldest sanskrit inscription was found in 1st century bce. why is sanskrit considered older than tamil then? If Harappan civilization was Dravidian is a hypothesis what makes you celebrate this computer programmers reasearch on language. It should also considered hypothesis period. If you try googling which language family is oldest Indo-Aryan or Dravidian you'll get your answer regarding which is the oldest language
"The only reason we cannot decipher Harappan scripts because aryans came and they destroyed and demotivated everything related to Harappan..." Well, that clearly isn't correct. Are you on meth by chance? 😳
@@switchblade970 WHo told? anthropology proved that vedic age of south asia is 1500 BCE. there are 4000 Year old swstik symbols, Evidences for vedic fire rituals
@@piyushpant1981The guy should first submit his research to peer review, they will give him feedback on his work but he has not done that. The author has to prove his research first before others can prove him wrong
Sanskrit is just 3600 years old. Harappa and Indus valley is 5300 years to 11000 years old. And Dr. David Reich's genetic test proved that it matched only with ancient Tamils. Then how come this guy says Sanskrit is there? Sanskrit is artificially made by Bramins, bramins were Jews before 3750 years ago. Their mother tongue was Aramic. Aramic was just 4500 years old. Then how come this Indus valley script matched with sanskrit. Sanskrit letters were created just 1800 years ago in in Rudrathama dynasty. Obviously, this guy does not decipher anything from the Indus valley hieroglyphs.
Why do people keep peddling this nonsense about Indians and Iranians being related, Iranians are different from Indians. They aren't Arabs of course but they have been invaded and mixed over so many times in history they might as well be. 😂
Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. Then why the nomads say Sanskrit is the base language and mother of languages and ancient.. You should tell that Prakrithm is the ancient and mother of languages.. You cannot fool public in this Satya Yuga.
kid, u literally don't know anything. You get your Sources from Garbage. SANSKRIT is Samuskritam not Pakritam. Sankrit and Prakrit are both Vernacular Forms of Vedic Sanskrit Linguistically. Learn basics or Sir in school
LMAO.. what? Sanskrit is SAMUSKRITHAN and prakrit is From of Vedic sanskrit. You dont even know basic Lingustic information. u people always create lies out of nowhere
FOR the people who tell he is NOT Genuine. This Research is Supported by Linear ML and Deep learning systems Combined with Anthropoidal Reseach. in MIT university and Human sciences Scholars. Un-educated people will have opinion like that
For tamils, who are saying nonsense. Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. And indus valley is 3000 BCE. Dravidan is an Reconstructed language family not a language, not a Race. Dravidian in Indus valley is just an Archeological Suggestion not proved
Excellent work. The methodology is sound and anyone with an iota of data science or decent statistics will agree. A word of caution to non Tamil speakers: Over the past decade a whole bunch of pseudo researchers have emerged that have spread hundreds and thousands of videos on youtube saying Tamilians were the people of IVC and in fact the whole world. There is another bunch that claims original mankind were Tamilians of Lemuria and Aseevagam which supposedly were the submerged landmass between South India and Australia. They conflate sounds and words , parse them with zero consistency and call it research based on "words". Others misinterpret carbon-dating results as proof that the Tamil race (which they believe is somehow defined in their DNA!) as the oldest, and that all languages came from Tamil. Unfortunately there is a large proportion of ill-educated (ie they have a degree but have no learning behind it) wastrels that like this ego boost and carry it forward. These people are not going to understand or accept whatever doesn't suit their theory.
Sangi Sir, ruclips.net/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/видео.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English. Pl see all the videos. Like this prove that your dead Sanskrit is mother of languages. Sangi Sir, Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. Then how this Sanskrit be older than original Prakrithm. You should tell that Prakrithm is oldest and mother of languages. The word Sanskrit itself shows that it is not oldest.. Ok Educated fool. Be logic.
@@TSR64 If you think RUclips is an archeological source. u literally a F00L. even according to Tamil nadu archeological site. oldest evidence of tamil is 600 BCE.
@@CHRS-ri5mf lmao somw Un-educated, useless video. Even I can create a Video like that? you have 0 scientific knoweldge. I wonder You have brain or not. THINKING THAT a youtuber is an archeologist and scientist. Imagine there are f00ls like you
Ammature fun research. Its doesnt make sense, same indus scripts can be found in TN as well. So does it mean sanskrit was spoken by ancient tamil potters. Indus was pre-aryan civilization so it cannot be sanskrit which is a later imported language. Indus sample dna only matches with irular tribes of south india, so there is a mismatch.
@sudipbhattacharjee9 Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@@sudipbhattacharjee9 Bengalis wont know. Sanskrit has 50% Tamil words...Tamil can operate without Sanskrit. Ask some scholars. In fact proto-tamil was the spoken language in entire south Asia. Your former CM Jyoti Basu and present CM Mamata too stated this. Also Ambedkar.
I have gone through his Documents. Intriguingly amazing
Bro I didn't have time to see the full video which is of 48 minutes on this channel... Can you please tell me what he basically discovered ?? What's that secret of indus valley ??
Thanks for the comment. Then there are those whom type elaborate "emotional" comments attempting to refute a research they have no nut-and-bolt of an idea of !
@@truth2 Watch the entire video and find it for yourself ! Are you that uneducated ?
@@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too. This is Big. but ML and DL models show Indo-European terms NOT Dravidian. If confirmed more. this Could change histroy.
@@ExploreWorldAE Surprising thing is... Both Linear models work on IVC scripts when in cryptograms
Government of India should pay immediate attention and fund further research in this direction. Establishing the truth in this area can puncture many propaganda theories and conspiracies especially the mythical North South divide. All sanatani organisations should also highlight these findings.....the whole academia is mostly compromised
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
Correct 👍 North - South, Aryan - Dravidian divide rubbish theory has already been exposed....But this work should be recognized and encouraged by government of India
Jai Bharat 👍
Hey, are you talking about puncturing the propaganda of Sun dynasty descendants and Moon dynasty descendants because celestial bodies do not give birth to humans.
Hey, And what about the propaganda of Hanuman, because no such species exist which can fly larger amount of distance without wings and no to forget superpowers like lifting a mountain and carrying it.
First talk about the above ridiculousness before you actually call out current scientific consensus lmao
@@patsub south indians don't call themselves dravidian. Infact it's an alien word for us. This dravidian thing came from tamilnadu and made popular by mslims, christians , pakistanis and Bangladeshis. On twitter a page named dravidian... The user was found to be a Bangladeshi. We kannadigas love sanskrit and tamil both. We don't have identity called dravida . It's popular in internet only . Our governments kept on pushing these theories instead of shtting them up. Now BJP is also doing nothing because they are scared that they will not get votes in South india
@@jagatsimulation 👍👍
Indian history now can be pushed back to more ancient timeline
Indian already has an ancient timeline and there's never been any dispute around it. Deciphering an ancient script doesn't erase or invent archaeological evidence.
I don't understand this need to swallow the lie from a certain political spectrum that only they are uncovering history, when that has always been uncovered and open to see for ages now.
@@sandyqbg The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script First time and Completely Matches all Symbols. You don't have any knowledge and blabbering Nonsense.
@@sandyqbg What type of F00l are you? For you people anything that supports india is fake. THERE is no political Involvement in this. This is done by ML and along human sciences Scholars.
@Englishlearno-om6mt If you don't know what you're yapping on about, I'd suggest that you keep quiet and let people who know do the talking. Just throwing around terms like ML, DL, Linear models doesn't make you seem smart, just exposes that you're a wannabe.
Most unknown languages scripts aren't deciphered with these models. If they've been deciphered, then image and language models are used to scale further deciphering. And any ML or DL model is only as good as the learning data it is fed. And if Mr Yajnadevam had fed it fictional translations, then it will spit out more fictional translations. And given the lack of a reproducible documentation of his method, the poor matching between the symbology and the Sanskrit verses from his photos and even contradictory claims by Mr Yajnadevam himself on whether it is a logographic or syllabilic writing system merely casts more shadow on the credibility of it.
However, as one end of the political spectrum has clearly shown, it doesn't really care for logic or evidence or even truth, as long as their ideology is being mollycoddled. And therefore just one statement that IVC is sanskrit is more than enough for the purpose the claim is being made.
The best part of studying civilizations older than 8000 BCE is that the Europeans had not emerged from the North. This is why West is shy about dealing with Indus. You can also see the original way Indians behaved before 300 years of Anglo Colonization. How brilliant & business savvy they were. Indians have always made money with trade, without colonization. And these Indians were same as the Indians today, the only thing that changed was behaviour under colonization, as Indians had to survive the Anglos. Simply fascinating.
5-600 of Muslim & 150 years of British
This should be included in school curriculum, since it is mathematically proven now. Indus, harappa civilization was extension of our hindu Civilization.
You are smoking something like weed .
This language is useless for common people.
if Yajnadevan claim is true, deserves a noble prize
Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
@@CHRS-ri5mf you have hatred and aversion towards Tamil people lol
Great news. Good to know that This research is supported by higher machine learning and DLs. Also this supported by Human sciences scholar is Amazing
YES !
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
No, The Main Thing of This Research is that it support linear models for firs time @@gabrielemmanuel36
@@gabrielemmanuel36Keeladi is 600 BCE - 750 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE on least
@@CHRS-ri5mfnorthies have high steppe Ancestry
You’re amazing!! Panini grammar !! It’s what we need to prove continuity of civilization
What’s the Dholavira plaque writing ?
I didn't knew dholavira had plaque writing too, i thought it was a recent civilization
I read these. What's shocking is. This research is supported by linear decipherment. Which is used to decipher most ancient scripts and unknown scripts. Also this also matched with machine learning models and with Z. Linear for the first time.
Great Work. Hope it is recognized if correct.
Indus valley sculpture art still exist . The 4000 years old sculpture making process passed on to generation . Even today in many parts of India people are still using that ancient Lost -wax casting technique called Dhokra art. The communities who are making the Dhokra sculpture are Gonds , Dhurwas , Jhera and Khond . These communities speak ancient languages like Parji , Gondi , Kuvi , Kuyi as their mother tongue . So please do researches on these languages of Chhattisgarh , Odisha and Madhya Pradesh. Another language which is close to these languages is Kurukh
WOW great. hoping for a Leap in anthropology
Vanakam 🕉️ Unity & acceptance of all forms of our ,for father’s time sacrificed for well being of all lives 🦚🪷🌦️
Proud ❤
Very compelling... i approach this woth a lot of scepticism and i dont k ow if his thesis is right...but it sounds extremely honest and brings a new approach ...
Given how similar Russian and even more so Lithuanian to Sanskrit...I am a bit worried they (Western linguists and archaeologists who interpret findings through the lens of Judeo-Christian timelines) will say we are a bunch of Lithuanians or Russians who just lost our way enroute to Australia and ended up in India.
This is one of the many persons who have broken the Indus script. If this is Sanskrit 4000+ years back, then next after such a long time we find a primitive authenticated Sanskrit Rig Veda text from the year 1460 CE at the Bhandarkar Research Institute
Exactly
that's a huge break through because most unknown ancient scripts are Deciphered using Machine code (Linear Based Mathematical models)
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@@gabrielemmanuel36 dude...this team wants to connect it with Sanskrit and you want their opinion on Tamil scipt? you must be kidding.
@naveenjayapal2331 Yea, I just kind of curios wanting to know their thought process of either being biasely ignorant or what.. Remember this; most of "these groups "still believing" that Marathas are the father of Indian Navy historically whereas Rest-of-World have "different opinion" on that.
@@gabrielemmanuel36maybe both the people of Indus valley & keezhadi spoke sanskirit or some short of indo aryan language. Do you have any proof that people of keezhadi spoke Dravidian language
@@gabrielemmanuel36cholas were Aryans. Doesn't matter. Indian Navy is the product of Aryan supremacy
Thanks for this news
Another nail in the coffin for the "Aryan Invasion/Migration/Immigration/Tourism Theory!
yes
Indeed. 😊
Do you know about mittani and sintastha?
@@switchblade970 mittanis were a straight vedic sanskrit speaking/writing people of indic civilisation! also much, much later than what is being discussed here. and what have sinthasta people got to do with mittanis anyways?
@@brachisaurous so did Aryans from india traveled to create sinhastha and mittani culture ?? Becoz presence of Aryans can only dated back to 1500bce but sinhastha and mittani culture are atleast 1000 years older than vedic culture
What was written in those scripts.?
It's shown in the other longer video posted by this channel itself.
Great news Anand ji 👍
Jai Shree Ram, Har Har Mahadev 👍🙏
Some people Literally Don't have basic knowledge. And this is about Research by MIT and other major Scholars there. And Some Are Connecting this to Caste And Poltics. F00lish. This is a Great research and has Potential 🎉
Great Effort Yajnadevam...congratulations
Congratulations Yajnadevam
Damn, The Machine learning and Linear code matches Linear Z too. This is definingly has great potential. Take this to archeological reviews and fund this
Yep, and that's huge break through because most ancient scripts are Deciphered using Machine code (Linear Based Mathematical models)
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@@gabrielemmanuel36 Those symbols were taken to Keezadi by Indus migrants. Most Tamils are genetically closer to Andamanese Hunter Gatherers than to the Iran_Nmaxxed Indus people.
@@gabrielemmanuel36 Keezhadi finds are just graffiti, not language. Only single symbols have been found and not even one word of IVC script or anything that looks like IVC script.
Tamil has two scripts one used in tamil nadu and other in malaysia
Congrats Yajnadevam 👏
Great achievement!
That was awesome.
This episode is like just scratching the surface.
What Yagnadevam brings to the table is deduction based on a proven methodology of scientific study. Even if the deductions turn out to be inaccurate one cannot fault the approach.
He tried to minimize the technical jargon and present it in a more lucid manner but I feel he should come out with a more in-depth session where he can present the technical details as well as the assumptions drawn from them.
The references that he quoted about the Dhruva Nakshatra in Vishnupuram and the Vedic alter alignment in Brahmanas are factual evidences that are verifiable and indisputable, going by that as an indicative metric one can say Yagnavedam has put in extensive efforts to arrive at his interpretations.
What really bothers me is the fact that this is not getting the kind of coverage in the mass media which it deserves.
Looking for to an extensive, in-depth and insightful episode soon.
Anand Narismhan thank you for an engrossing podcast, bring out the next at the earliest.
. TAMILIANS beliveing anything Rhat waa told to them. These people should study basics. Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
Sameway, you guys should also know that the oldest inscription of sanskrit found in india is 100 BCE. Tamil's oldest inscription belongs to 600 BCE.Even language like Pali is older than sanskrit. Don't just say your own theories like rig Veda written in 5000 , 6000 BCE without evidence. These are all mere constructs without evidence. If we say some references to tamil's age from ancient tamil text, it seems to be mere theories for you . But you can say whatever you wanted without evidence.
@@kavi3483 While the oldest known Sanskrit inscriptions may date to around 100 BCE, Sanskrit was traditionally preserved through a highly sophisticated oral tradition, which predates written inscriptions by many centuries. This makes comparing Sanskrit’s age based solely on inscriptions misleading. Sanskrit was later adapted into multiple regional scripts, including Brahmi, Kharosthi, Grantha, Devanagari, and others, reflecting its widespread influence.
The claim that Pali is older than Sanskrit is incorrect, as Vedic Sanskrit-the language of the Rigveda-predates Pali by several centuries. Similarly, while the Tamil-Brahmi script has inscriptions from around 600 BCE, Vedic Sanskrit’s oral tradition dates back to at least 1500 BCE, with scholarly consensus placing the Rigveda in this period based on linguistic, cultural, and comparative evidence.
Lastly, the recent claims suggest it has been deciphered as Sanskrit. Meanwhile peer-reviewed validation & consensus is in process. Thus, while Tamil inscriptions are indeed ancient, the antiquity of Sanskrit, particularly its oral tradition, is well-supported by historical evidence and remains one of the oldest in the world.
Ohh this guy has some aversion towards Tamil people.
@@kavi3483tamil oldest inscription in 600 BCE where did you find it. Inscription writing isn't indian tradition. It was introduced by Mauryans. Mauryans didn't control south india. Where did you got this 600 BCE old Tamil inscription???
@@kavi3483pali oldest inscription wasn't even found in india. It was found in Burns in 5th century lol
👏
Amazing work!!! Request to all the people commenting positively or negatively, please take the effort of reading the paper. Remember, in science or in history, when you see proof against your belief, you change your belief, not the other way around. Having said that, please also note that this always is an evolving process. The author has certainly achived a major milestone in our journey to the past, but that will not 'decipher' entire Indus-Saraswati scripts nor it will be the final word on this topic (hopefully, it will not be and more people try to solve this with their own thought process)
I read these. What's shocking is. This research is supported by linear decipherment. Which is used to decipher most ancient scripts and unknown scripts. Also this also matched with machine learning models and with Z. Linear for the first time.
@@CHRS-ri5mf what are you saying
Very interesting. 😊
Indus script is not using Mathra system. It is a script older than languages using Indian Mathra system.
Trading seals of Indus trading businesses could just be logos. So, researchers need to take their time, not to mix up Indus company logos with actual script. Indus was closely linked with Egypt, via trade as well as China. This was before Europeans emerged up North.
Logos do refers to some message and there is brahmi script which tends to be the modern version of that time the only thing indus script was never been deciphered was the agenda that put forward by europeans
I hope this is true. I just hope. If it isn't proven, boy, would he give Indians a bad name !
16:40 *The Seal at the right Spells "ANNAL" means Lord Muruga*
Tamilians in comment section. Literally beleive aryan Invasion theory which was Disapproved. And Official Research or Archeologist said There is Tamil in Indus valley. Tamils create Fake myths for themselfs. Also Dravidan is an Hypothetical Reconstructed family which is not a Race or single Language
Seal meaniing " dinosarus and Aliens did not speak tamil"
@@allareone1947 😒🦎 डिनो छिपकली संस्कृत बोलता था, तमिल आदि मानव बोलता या
@@PerumPalli nonsense.. Oldest langauge would be Hunter-gatherer Language. Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. No Anthropological..department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. DRAVIDIAN is not race or Language. it is Reconstructed language FAMILY. thats all... only tamilians say Sar we oldest" "Nobody is greater thean tamil. just EGOISTIC people
@@allareone1947 *Who Said We are only the Greatest rest all are Dumbass, Hunter Gatherers Spoke Tamil, Do u Sanskrit guy's have Proof for Sanskrit older that 1 st Century AD no right*
If he has decipher then what is written
He does not decipher anything.
@@satheeshkvenkatIt's there in his research paper.
Many shlokas of Vedas , particularly of rigveda .
Could like to inquire whether it has been accepted by International archeological society, like the Heiroglyps script of Egypt and the cuneiform script of Mesopotamia.
He did not decipher the Indus Valley script with Sanskrit, but he's trying to prove Tamil words which have already been deciphered by comparison with Indus script as Sanskrit words.
How did anyone think the changing graphics was a good idea.
Sanskrit was traditionally preserved through a highly sophisticated oral tradition (पाठन via पाठशाला) that predates written inscriptions by many centuries. This makes comparing Sanskrit’s age based solely on inscriptions misleading. Over time, Sanskrit was adapted into multiple regional scripts, including Brahmi, Kharosthi, Grantha, and Devanagari, reflecting its widespread influence across the subcontinent.
The claim that Pali is older than Sanskrit is incorrect, as Vedic Sanskrit-the language of the Rigveda-predates Pali by several centuries. Similarly, while the Tamil-Brahmi script has inscriptions from around 600 BCE, Vedic Sanskrit’s oral tradition dates back to at least 1500 BCE. Scholarly consensus places the Rigveda in this period based on linguistic, cultural, and comparative evidence.
There are also recent claims suggesting that the Indus Valley script may have been deciphered as Sanskrit, although peer-reviewed validation and scholarly consensus on this are still in progress. While intriguing, this theory remains speculative until further substantiated.
Notably, we have an authenticated Rigveda manuscript from the year 1460 CE at the Bhandarkar Research Institute, which offers a historically significant record of the text and supports the continuity of Vedic Sanskrit’s tradition.
In conclusion, while Tamil inscriptions are indeed ancient, the antiquity of Sanskrit, particularly its oral tradition, is well-supported by historical evidence, making it one of the oldest continuous languages in the world.
1) Indus Script is Logo-Syllabic, not Abugida. It have some pictographs. Their are no repeated pattern of strokes in basic signs of Indus Script, whereas we see same diactritic vowel pattern is used to write different consonants in Brahmi Script.
2) He used one sign value for 10 different signs, which is not logical. Some of them are clear depiction of animal.
3) The signs of Brahmi Script which he idenfied as Indus signs are not even look similar in most cases.
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@gabrielmanuel, Indus Valley symbols are common all over India including loacations in North India in locations in North India of years older than Keezhadi. Plus some of the people genetically closest to the Rakhigarhi gene samples are Tamil Brahmins who have a clear Vedic origin
@raghavantheerthagiri7888 Rakhigarhi cropse gene DNA similar to Tamil Brahmin?!? Seriously?!? Not Irula tribes?!? Are there clear proof stating them of clear Vedic origin?!? Please be factual rather than jumping with assumptions..
The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script First time and Completely Matches all Symbols. You don't have any knowledge and blabbering Nonsense.
@@gabrielemmanuel36 All you need to do is just check genetic studies The only people with over 50% Indus Valley ancestry in South India are the Brahmins with a few upper castes like Nairs, Bunts, Vellamas having around 50% Most of the rest are predominantly AASI And yes Brahmins are Vedi with most South Indian Brahmins clustering with each other.
A study published in the American Journal of Human Genetics found that modern-day India is the result of a population mixture between two ancestral groups, including Ancestral North Indians (ANI) who are related to Europeans, Central Asians, Middle Easterners, and Caucasians.(Invaders can't claim Indus valley civilization)
First of all you do not even see what system the language uses. Indian languages today are MATHRA system languages, where symbols are used to change the sound of the alphabet in words. Does not matter how alphabet is shaped as different tribes tend to show their own individuality, so the shapes & direction of writing, etc will change to make an identity for the tribe. Now, everything from Hindi, Kannada, Tamil, Marathi, etc in India, Persian, Arabic, etc west of India & Khymer, Bali East of India are MATHRA system languages. This means these tribes originate from India.
👏👏👏👏👏
Does indus valley language had adjectives and adverbs?
Manas Jaiswal Indus Script shows similaity to Proto-Cuneiform Script, which was Pictogaphic/ Logogaphic. There are no traces to Abuguda type script in ancient world until brahmi Script.
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
hey, gabriel could you fyck out from India pls
14:00 when he asked how did you conclude Sanskrit alone and not any other languages? The anchor himself was nervous, started biting his nails 😂
Do indus valey had library like in other civilization?
Did indus valley people built dams.
No
Does indus language have similitrairty with iranian language in soeech?
HAKIM IS CALLED AS HALF DOCTOR, 😁😁😁😁😁😁
Very dubious analysis. No horses found in the Indus Valley. If Indus language is the forerunner of Sanskrit it should be easy to connect the both. Not convincing.
F00lish Interpertation of Yours.
Yes Aryans in Sintashta culture had raths and horses. The sintastha culture was around 2200 bce to 1900bce which coincides with later Harappan period. If Harappan were Aryans there should have been mentioning of horse indeed
Full of lies to make indus as brahminical civilization 😂😂😂
Don’t need to watch this. There’s nothing revealed!
For tamils, anything which does not support them is FAke, even Science is Fake for these tamils. Such blinded mad people
Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script First time and Completely Matches all Symbols. You don't have any knowledge and blabbering Nonsense. This Research is also supported by MIT and human sciences Scholars
@@CHRS-ri5mf
Yep. Butthurt Tamils. 😂
Ok dravidian periyarite 🤣
@@jokepore1532okay steppe aryanite😂
Can dictionary and grammar be reverse engineerred?
Khan market gang. Lutyens media. Jnu gang all will be in depression
I really cant find him or his works on Google.... This man seems suspicious
Great great research to prove Sanatanism . Another Vimanashastra
Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@@gabrielemmanuel36 I wouldn't trust anything where the starting point is from standpoint of an emotional bias. Research should be conducted with a mental state where you keep aside your personal and Kinship related biases.
@@cb9461 And what tells you that any research from Indian side has "personal biases" ?
@@cb9461I can smell your emotional biasness towards sanatanism. What an irony you're
@@cb9461most of Hindus don't even follow sanatana. agamic religion has already took over sanatan and vedas.
Interesting,,,, Curious if how close Proto Dravidian is close to Brahui ---- An old Dravidian language still partly spoken in Baluchistan.
Dravidian itself is an Hypothetical Reconstructed family. Not an Language. This is an Anthropology word. That's all
Languages can Start anywhere, Thats NO Suprise or wonder. also, Languages can Spread over time
@@CHRS-ri5mfyou are saying there is no seperate dravidian language family ?
Is mehrauli the name of Indus valley in iran civilization!
PPL of Mesopotamia used word 'Meluhha' to describe ivc PPL. And Mesopotamia is todays iraq not iran
@@switchblade970Iraq iran have same iranian farmer ancestry
@@Divine_wave23 bro let me explain there where civilization in Mesopotamia and harappa before we Aryans came and started living near hindukush mountains then this aryans where divided into two branches Iranian Aryans and Us. Iraq also have Aryan ancestry but they are not closely related to us like iran. Aryans in iraq came at different time and by different route than us
গ্রেট
Sanskrit do not know how to write until they come into india.
no
13:52 உருட்டு உருட்டு
some people are telling that Indus valley is Tamil. Literally NO evidence or official Report on that. no Internation or verified anthropological document on that. Tamils Literally Believe anything that is told to them. if you tell Dinosaurs Spoke it. they will believe it. even According to TAMIL NADU archeology department. oldest evidence of tamil itself is just 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE
Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
@@CHRS-ri5mf *Though u Growl From Red Fort it's Tamil u cant Read it, But I Can Read It Because it's Tamil*
@@PerumPalli Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. No Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real. This research is supported by Linear models which are used to decipher most of the Ancient scripts. Also this Is supported by MIT and Human Sciences scholars. DRAVIDIAN is not race or Language. it is Reconstructed language FAMILY. thats all
@@PerumPalli Science and Anthropology are NOT fools like u. You dont know anything
नीचे जो हैडलाइन आ रहा है विज्ञापन के रूप में वह कुछ पढ़ने सुनते ही नहीं दे रहा है इतना ज्यादा डिस्टर्बिग है ऐसे वीडियो बनाने से क्या मतलब जो व्यक्ति देखने के बदले बंद कर दे
I love the topic, but it is so hard to find a video without that silly dialect.
Mfr didn't even tell what was deciphered. Wasted my time
Read through his whitepaper.
Read his research paper 😂.
@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too.
Sanghi Propaganda
Tamil oldest evidence is 600 BCE. NO Anthropological or archeological department said Tamil is oldest. Tamil or Dravidian in Indus valley is Just a Theory and Suggestion. Not real
Anything that does not support tamil is fake ? Even Science is Fake you people
Just Because you hate Sanskrit and think Dinosaurs spoke Tamil?
@@CHRS-ri5mf if you want to by an inscription then Sanskrit is not even 2000 years old. black pepper were found in Pharaoh Ramses II's mummy (1200BCE), and Akananooru 149 (tamil literature) mentions Yavanas (foreigners) trading wood for pepper, wood was abundant in Egypt and the only way of pepper in ancient times is tamizhagam (kerala+tamilnadu), so tamil must be spoken at that times. so, tamil is atleast 3300 years old. And even the tamilee inscription is FOUND IN EGYPT that means Tamils are the ones who traded with Egyptians.
I will give you more like these around the world.
you forgot ro write saar in the end
This is pure hindu nationalist nonsense. The Indus Valley Civilization predated the arrival of Sanskrit into the region and thus spoke Dravidian or Elamo-Dravidian which in present-day Iran founded the Elamite or Haltami culture and in Pakistan founded Meluhha or the Indus Valley Civilization which expanded into present day India, migrating along the coast until these people reached the very southern tip of India. Along the way they interbred with India's tribal/Austroloid (Munda) population however they retained being Dravidian in speech instead of Munda. To state that the language of Meluhha was Sanskrit is absolutely absurd. Sanskrit itself is loaded with Dravidian loan vocabulary and some even tribal Austroloid or Munda vocabulary. Hindu nationalists need to get their heads screwed on straight. It is becoming comical now.
Provide the evidence - reference/citation for this statement : "The Indus Valley Civilization predated the arrival of Sanskrit into the region..." . Also provide the specific examples from the language Sanskrutam (Sanskrit) which are "Dravidian" in origin. Additionally what is "Dravidian vocabulary" ? Is Dravidian a language ?
@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too. You don't know a Single thing about anthropology. learn some basics
THERE is no proof of IVC being Elamite or Another culture. Indus valley older than Elamites. Why you people speak nonsense?
@@TheB657 There is so much evidence on the Internet. Just search for it!
Wonderful. Now could you please write a paper with repeatable evidence disproving Yajadevam's thesis and publish it in peer reviewed journal? It would greatly help
Fools and idiot s are talking wrongly
You Literally Don't know any basic knowledge. And this is about Research by MIT and other major Scholars there. And You Are Connecting this to Caste And Poltics. F00lish
For the Tamils who Never Touch some Anthropology and Archeology. Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE. No Archeological research said that Indus Valley belongs to Tamils or Dravidan. That is An Anthropological Suggestion and Never Was Confirmed. Tamils literally don't know Difference between a Theory and Approved Research
@@CHRS-ri5mfHaa haa haa...
Sangi Sir,
You have good ability to fool public. But In this Satya Yuga it will not work.
ruclips.net/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/видео.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR
Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English.
Prove like this.
Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. You say Sanskrit is ancient and mother of languages.. haa haa..
How can the refined Prakrithm be older than original Prakrithm.
Then you say Prakrithm is oldest and mother of languages. Then it is ok. But you won't tell for reasons you know only..
Be logic..
However Aryans came from outside.....from North..... so I think it must have a deep connection with the Indo-Aryan culture....
For the Tamils who Never Touch some Anthropology and Archeology. Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE. No Archeological research said that Indus Valley belongs to Tamils or Dravidan. That is An Anthropological Suggestion and Never Was Confirmed. Tamils literally don't know Difference between a Theory anf Approved Research
This guy is full of BS, he's tryna fit sanskrit to the indus language as best as he can and you guys are buying into it lol
What's wrong in that ? If you don't agree provide rebuttals rather than vague statement because he is providing technical details for what he saying and why he is saying ? What's your logic to criticize . Without any logical reasoning you are just gibberish
Then provide an example of "Indus Language" ?
@@TheB657 Early dravidian
@truth2 The partial decipherment of IVC script is made by ML and DL models. Meaning With use of Linear models. Most Unknown language scripts are deciphered using this Model. Now It Works for IVC script too. YOU don't Know a Single Thing. Go play Games
Do you know cryptography or information theory ?
So i do not agree with u
who are you to Not argree with or agree with? This research is supported by Linear models which are used to decipher most of the Ancient scripts. Also this Is supported by MIT and Human Sciences scholars. So Yejana Devam Used Machine learning models, equations and other Scripts and mixed it with LINEAR model. making it advanced.
IT'S CALLED FORECEFETING AND NOT DECIPHERING. A PERSON TRIED TO DO THE SAME IN 2012 BUT NO ONE BELIEVE HIM LOL@@AutonomousEvolutions
@@AjaryaRajput Person who did it Did not use Linear scrip and Did not Complete his Document Fully. Yejna devam said there Least 100s of Indus valley projects.
@@AutonomousEvolutionsthen why indus valley ancestry is high in dravidians 😂 why you have steppe Ancestry?
Good work. But unless peer reviewed, published in reputed international journals and accepted by the global scientific community to be authentic it will, sadly, remain one of the many similar claims made in the past.
*Its already deciphered & its Tamil*
Tamilians in comment section. Literally beleive aryan Invasion theory which was Disapproved. And Official Research or Archeologist said There is Tamil in Indus valley. Tamils create Fake myths for themselfs. Also Dravidan is an Hypothetical Reconstructed family which is not a Race or single Language
WTF ? When was it deciphered? In your imagination? No official Research said that Tamil is in Indus valley. No evidence. It an Archeological suggestion made to Reasearch
Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. Indus valley is more than 3000 BCE. Tamils never Study Archeology and anthropology but Knows to Believe anything that's &hit
@@CHRS-ri5mf *50 yrs Back itself it was Deciphered, I can read indus script can u*
@@CHRS-ri5mf *Go to Keezhadi, Aadhichcha Nalluur, Kozhaththalai river Basin, Mayilaadum paarai, There are Iron, Steel which is 4000 yrs old, as u go deep Brahmi with Mixture of Indus Script, Still Further deep in Soil Wholesome Indus Script is in Pot Sheds, Y don't Gangetic Basic Has it*
The only reason we cannot decipher Harappan scripts because aryans came and they destroyed and demotivated everything related to Harappan and now this guy comes from nowhere and claims Harappan where sanskrit speaking and implies Harappan ppl were aryans. What a joke 😂😂. Does yajnadevam knows anything about history? He is computer programmer who solves cryptography from newspaper lol
FOR the people who tell he is NOT Genuine. This Research is Supported by Linear ML and Deep learning systems Combined with Anthropoidal Reseach. in MIT university and Human sciences Scholars. Un-educated people will have opinion like that
You don't any knowledge on History or science. F00l. Aryan Invasion theory is Already Disapproved. You are living in imagination. This the Reasearch is Supported by linear models which is used to Decipher many Scripts
@@CHRS-ri5mf the oldest sanskrit inscription was found in 1st century bce. why is sanskrit considered older than tamil then? If Harappan civilization was Dravidian is a hypothesis what makes you celebrate this computer programmers reasearch on language. It should also considered hypothesis period. If you try googling which language family is oldest Indo-Aryan or Dravidian you'll get your answer regarding which is the oldest language
"The only reason we cannot decipher Harappan scripts because aryans came and they destroyed and demotivated everything related to Harappan..."
Well, that clearly isn't correct. Are you on meth by chance? 😳
@@switchblade970 WHo told? anthropology proved that vedic age of south asia is 1500 BCE. there are 4000 Year old swstik symbols, Evidences for vedic fire rituals
Fake narrative by geek😂
On the internet every one is a geek like yourselves, prove him wrong on his email send your research.
@@piyushpant1981 if he is write he will publish it, dump idiot
@@balablazariovideos2579 For Propagandist like you everything is fake even if it's shown with scienctific reasearch 👍
@@piyushpant1981The guy should first submit his research to peer review, they will give him feedback on his work but he has not done that. The author has to prove his research first before others can prove him wrong
And you have a "true narrative" ? If yes, what is it ? Citations/References ?
Sanskrit is just 3600 years old. Harappa and Indus valley is 5300 years to 11000 years old. And Dr. David Reich's genetic test proved that it matched only with ancient Tamils. Then how come this guy says Sanskrit is there? Sanskrit is artificially made by Bramins, bramins were Jews before 3750 years ago. Their mother tongue was Aramic. Aramic was just 4500 years old. Then how come this Indus valley script matched with sanskrit. Sanskrit letters were created just 1800 years ago in in Rudrathama dynasty. Obviously, this guy does not decipher anything from the Indus valley hieroglyphs.
Brahmins were NOT Jews 😂 what are you talking about?!
There was clearly shared language of Proto-Indo-Iranian that was shared between early IVC and Iran. So Iranians are Brahmins?
@@Aparajith_ early Iranian and early IVC ,modern Iranians are mix with semetic arabs
Brahmins are Jews now? Wow, you could do standup comedy. 😂
Why do people keep peddling this nonsense about Indians and Iranians being related, Iranians are different from Indians. They aren't Arabs of course but they have been invaded and mixed over so many times in history they might as well be. 😂
एसी फालतू काम करने को क्या मतलब है, जरूरत है कि आज कोई उपाय बताएं जिससे आतंकवादी संगठन के चाइनीज साधनों का व्यवहार समझा जाता है
Tukka
According to librandu bhakt not hindu😂😂😂
Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. Then why the nomads say Sanskrit is the base language and mother of languages and ancient..
You should tell that Prakrithm is the ancient and mother of languages..
You cannot fool public in this Satya Yuga.
ruclips.net/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/видео.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR
ruclips.net/user/IndusValleyLanguage
Sanskrit is Samuskritam not Pakritam. Where do you get your knowledge? From dustbins?
kid, u literally don't know anything. You get your Sources from Garbage. SANSKRIT is Samuskritam not Pakritam. Sankrit and Prakrit are both Vernacular Forms of Vedic Sanskrit Linguistically. Learn basics or Sir in school
LMAO.. what? Sanskrit is SAMUSKRITHAN and prakrit is From of Vedic sanskrit. You dont even know basic Lingustic information. u people always create lies out of nowhere
This guy is BS.
FOR the people who tell he is NOT Genuine. This Research is Supported by Linear ML and Deep learning systems Combined with Anthropoidal Reseach. in MIT university and Human sciences Scholars. Un-educated people will have opinion like that
For tamils, who are saying nonsense. Oldest evidence of Tamil is 600 BCE. And indus valley is 3000 BCE. Dravidan is an Reconstructed language family not a language, not a Race. Dravidian in Indus valley is just an Archeological Suggestion not proved
Excellent work. The methodology is sound and anyone with an iota of data science or decent statistics will agree.
A word of caution to non Tamil speakers: Over the past decade a whole bunch of pseudo researchers have emerged that have spread hundreds and thousands of videos on youtube saying Tamilians were the people of IVC and in fact the whole world. There is another bunch that claims original mankind were Tamilians of Lemuria and Aseevagam which supposedly were the submerged landmass between South India and Australia. They conflate sounds and words , parse them with zero consistency and call it research based on "words". Others misinterpret carbon-dating results as proof that the Tamil race (which they believe is somehow defined in their DNA!) as the oldest, and that all languages came from Tamil. Unfortunately there is a large proportion of ill-educated (ie they have a degree but have no learning behind it) wastrels that like this ego boost and carry it forward. These people are not going to understand or accept whatever doesn't suit their theory.
❤ I know that There are lot of educated and intelligent people. More people like you needed in India 😢
Ok. Educated sangi.
ruclips.net/user/IndusValleyLanguage
Sangi Sir,
ruclips.net/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/видео.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR
Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English.
Pl see all the videos. Like this prove that your dead Sanskrit is mother of languages.
Sangi Sir,
Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. Then how this Sanskrit be older than original Prakrithm. You should tell that Prakrithm is oldest and mother of languages.
The word Sanskrit itself shows that it is not oldest..
Ok Educated fool.
Be logic.
@@TSR64 If you think RUclips is an archeological source. u literally a F00L. even according to Tamil nadu archeological site. oldest evidence of tamil is 600 BCE.
@@CHRS-ri5mf lmao somw Un-educated, useless video. Even I can create a Video like that? you have 0 scientific knoweldge. I wonder You have brain or not. THINKING THAT a youtuber is an archeologist and scientist. Imagine there are f00ls like you
Ammature fun research. Its doesnt make sense, same indus scripts can be found in TN as well. So does it mean sanskrit was spoken by ancient tamil potters. Indus was pre-aryan civilization so it cannot be sanskrit which is a later imported language. Indus sample dna only matches with irular tribes of south india, so there is a mismatch.
Ofcourse, Tamil has 50% Sanskrit words anyway
@sudipbhattacharjee9 Since 1980s, many have claimed deciphering Indus Script but not validated. What's your say on Indus symbols and similarities been discovered during Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu?
@sudipbhattacharjee9 Well, numerous scholars stating that Sanskrits having loan words from Tamil language.
Don't use anglo mythological identties like dravida & pre-aryan. There has been no change in gene for 6000 years as per DNA analysis on Rakhigarhi
@@sudipbhattacharjee9 Bengalis wont know. Sanskrit has 50% Tamil words...Tamil can operate without Sanskrit. Ask some scholars. In fact proto-tamil was the spoken language in entire south Asia. Your former CM Jyoti Basu and present CM Mamata too stated this. Also Ambedkar.