Yessss..anything between 35 and 45 works. 50 sometimes is a bit tight. I have used this lens for a short period and is really lovely. Tack sharp and lovely bokeh in most situations. Might check out the new Samyang 45mm too. Do you plan to review? It is meant to be good. Thanks for the review and the pictures.
The 35 mm is a great lens for environmental portraits without much distortion. Also , it is a perfect lens for doing street photography which is neither too tight or neither too wide. It feels more cinematic using this lens. I actually love this lens . So enjoyable to take photographs. And it is a super sharp lens for urban landscapes .
I use a 35mm for most of my wedding details shots. Having come from the Canon world where I owned the 35mm 1.4L I was never impressed with the Sony Zeiss 35mm 1.4. I picked up this one and it gets the job done in fine fashion! It joins my 28mm f2, 55mm 1.8, and 85mm 1.8 to make up one of the lightest wedding kits ever!
Brian Copeland I just picked this bad boy up used. I didn’t not think it was over priced for size and focus but for those complaining it’s going for $600 all day on eBay now. eBay charging tax now which takes away from some of the savings. Plan on using this plus the 85 for weddings now. I might sell my 55 now which will break my heart. The 35 is just that job and the coverage is more ideal for me. Tamron 28-75 is my back up just I case something goes wrong. Have had camera fail but never a lens. But as you know weddings you have to be prepared. How has your experience been in the field with it. I have not had a chance to put it to work yet but got some events coming up.
I see this focal length gaining in popularity. It’s great for editorial fashion shoots. It does a great job when shooting professional models but when shooting people that look like I do (aka non-model material) it’s not my first choice. It’s great at exaggerating flaws. In a few of my Zoom range lenses I have 35mm like in my 16-35 and 28-75 but I find I barely use 35mm for some reason. I would guess I won’t be getting this lens but it does look like a great option for those that do shoot in this focal length.
as you said you don't use a 35mm you're more like a 50mm guy, and I get it, but if you use the 85mm and the 35mm maybe on 2 different cameras, then you'll feel like immortal, that's how I feel like since I got the 35mm
nice video you have just answered most of my question, my only question is not answered is I would like to know if I can use this lens for Live streaming... I have subscribed and I like to see more video of yours...keep up the good work
I had a samyang 35 1.4 but it broke when I dropped it, but then I purchased the Sony 24mm GM and by far it is my most used lens, aside from my 85 gm. I don't think I can go back to a 35mm anymore. If I need it, I can always use crop mode on my a7riii :)
This lens does have a mount gasket. A tiny thin 'O' ring that sits ever so slightly proud. Probably enough to seal it from water given the tight fit and precision finish of the metal mount. In their promotional material Sony claim it to be dust and moisture resistant but with this footnote "Not guaranteed to be 100% dust and moisture proof." So I wouldn't shoot in the pouring rain with it or with any Sony camera except the A9 and A99.
I actually prefer the 45mm f1,8 lens by samyang which is also light weight & significantly cheaper. I also have a Mir 35mm f2 (based on zeiss design) and gives quality rendering. I do however think thatthe sony 35mm f1.8 is a good value lens if one makes use of its AF features - which is why it is more expensively priced (af motor) and because there is no other lightweight lens in this category. But as I do a lot of manual focus compositional work + the 45mm is a very niceFL I went in for the samyang instead
You should buy the Tamron 28-75 as a complement to the wide angle lens you already have. After using it for a while you will then be able to decide what focal length of a prime lens will work best for you if you actually need one. Good luck!
I have owned if for nearly a month now, and finally went out and took some shots with it on my A7R3. For a $450 lens, it would be considered a great lens, but for $750, it just isn't worth it. The vignetting is significant even up to F5.6 (I seldom shoot beyond F5.6), and there is significant green fringing. It is sharp, but the bokeh isn't amazing given the cost. The AF is great though. I like the 35mm focal length for my walk around lens, so it will stay in my bag on a regular basis. At this point, I am not interested in going with the Sigma's because of the weight (and cost of the 1.2). At $450 I would give it 9/10 stars, but at $750 it is more like 7.5/10.
The fringing is simply unacceptable and the transition between fully out of focus backgrounds and in focus planes are quite terrible as well for this price tag indeed
@@charruaporelmundothe 2.8za was never a competitive lens to begin with, but also, it has slightly better color rendering and is significantly better in CA. Also the price really depends on where you look as it is only about 475 usd in Australia
I have the 24mm, 55mm, and 85mm and for events and everyday use I'd say the 35mm. I I initially had the 85mm for portraits and thought it was too tight for environmental and full body shots so I got the 55m, I still feel like it can be a little tight at times and just wish I can have all lens available. I feel the 35mm is the best for just everyday use as you can always walk up close for people photos with some distortion
The Samyang is not as portable so it depends on usage. For photography alone, I enjoyed the samyang. Good for video too but maybe not as reliable as the native Sony.
I’m amaze with it sharpness too, I pair it with the planar, lens that I love too. Do you know if the Distagon is as sharp as this 1.8?, or better color rendition?...
Wide open is wide open no matter what the aperture. f/1.8 is plenty of light and shallow DOF for a 35mm lens. The fact you have a very sharp lens wide open is a huge plus and something not many lenses offer. When using normal to telephoto lenses a larger aperture makes more sense. A 35 is on the normal side of wide angle and is not a lens that is always shot at the widest aperture. Having a deeper DOF is more useful. The wider a lens gets the smaller the focal point or subject is. This is why most wide landscapes are shot at f8 and beyond as is street photography. It’s as if once a photographer learns how to achieve bokeh they simply cannot stop. If you look at some of the greatest street photographers you’ll see much of the image is in focus. My point here is that the f/1.8 for a 35mm lens might just be the perfect lens/aperture available.
@@shutterpp1108 I have the sigma right now and I love it man. I went with Sigma because I have the filter sizes for it already and Sigma offers awesome image quality/sharpness. The AF is reliable in 95% of the cases. Might be a little slower than native Sony lenses but its still good. If you do portraits, avoid shooting into the sun because this lens has lots of trouble doing that.
Actually, there is a very small rubber gasket. Very easy to miss it, and probably gives just some protection. Use your finger nail to press in and locate it. This is not present in the FE 85F1.8.
stefan, do you know the rokinon 35 mm 1.5?? Leaving aside that it is manual focus, what do you think of it? I was trying to find in your reviews something related to this lens. But, I did not find anything
Torn between this or the batis 25 f2.. I already own a zeiss 55mm, which is great but I’d like something a little wider. I feel like the 35 is more of an allround lens, but it could also be too close (same) to the 55.. The 25 would go well with the 55. And the 35 actually sits somewhere in between that, not wide enough, not close enough. But like I said, if I’m searching for an allround/everyday lens the 35 just makes more sense. I don’t know what would you do :)
I have the 25mm f2 and the 35mm . The 35mm is sharper all around . The 25mm has better colors As most Zeiss lens do . I am going to list my 25mm on ebay soon . As i feel like this 35mm will be on my camera ALOT . I enjoy it that much .
LT this is why I prefer the 35mm focal length for a lot of things. 50 always seems too short or too long. There’ve only been a couple of instances in years of shooting where I thought, “man, a 50 is just what I need right at this moment” that a 35 couldn’t accomplish. It’s simply a more versatile focal length imo. The way I see it folks have a few choices for a prime kit. 18, 35, 85 or 24, 50 and 135 if you like shooting long.
I don't know if I am the only one but I can feel things moving inside the lens when I turn it upside down . The movements stops when the lens is attached to the lens and the camera is ON. Is it a problem or is this normal ?
@@StefanMalloch Yea. I feel it might be the focusing motor. It does not happen that much on the 16-35 f/4 or my 85 mm f/1.8 . So I am a little surprised. I was thinking whether I had bumped it accidentally. Generally I am quite delicate with my lenses. But at least someone else also faced the same scenario.
Hey thanks for this video. I really wanna buy this lens but have one question. If I'm shooting it on the a7iii and got the aspc 35mm crop button (would make it look like a 50mm) will I lose any quality? Thanks!
@@StefanMalloch pero para video con 8 mp es suficiente para 4k, e incluso para fotografía sin recorte para internet, ya que no pasamos los 1920xp, yo tengo el lente, también el 85 y con esos hago de todo en fotografía y video, muy buena combinación la recomiendo.
Just received my 35mm 1.8 FE and something I noticed right out of the box is when I rotate it in my hand (top to bottom and bottom to top) I feel something moving inside. Is that normal? I tried the same thing with a couple of my other Sony lenses and I do not feel something moving inside.
What´s kinda weird about the bokeh is that it´s more visible on the top half of the bokeh ball. The 85 has the same effect or whatever you wanna call it.
Beast Mode it’s going to be hard to beat voight character. I do think the 35mm FE is better do to the if you do t have time to autofocus. I have let people mirror me before with manual lenses and they take all day which is a pain for me and the subject. But if you know what you are doing the voight will serve you well.
Ian Lester the Sony for sure. I love love love the samyang output but it’s big and slower auto. While for portraits it does not matter. Events it does. I had not problem with the samyang for the price and what you get. What the Sony 35 does is let you shout without having the newer bodies. Can get a cheaper backup.
I don't like the fact that the inside elements are loose when the lens is not powered or attached to camera body. That's not normal to me. Even though Sony says it is OK.
Hi Stefan, Loved the review ! BTW - I just got my copy today and noticed some minor specs on the glass ( which are not dust - couldn't remove them with lens pen ) Attached in the picture drive.google.com/file/d/1WwWbwJcXFChLo5TafNYjnErgY2iyIIff/view?usp=sharing Do you think I should ask for a replacement or is it common to have minor blemishes as such ? I took some shots with it and couldn't notice anything in the photos. Thanks for your advise !
Is 35mm your go to focal length?
It is. I own the lens and am so happy with it!
Good choice!
50mm 1.4 zeiss and 85gm for portraits. 24mm gm for landscapes and street This looks like a decent lens
Yessss..anything between 35 and 45 works. 50 sometimes is a bit tight. I have used this lens for a short period and is really lovely. Tack sharp and lovely bokeh in most situations. Might check out the new Samyang 45mm too. Do you plan to review? It is meant to be good. Thanks for the review and the pictures.
@@crazyfriendslover Hey glad you like the lens, Does you element inside move around when not powered on?
The 35 mm is a great lens for environmental portraits without much distortion. Also , it is a perfect lens for doing street photography which is neither too tight or neither too wide. It feels more cinematic using this lens. I actually love this lens . So enjoyable to take photographs. And it is a super sharp lens for urban landscapes .
I use a 35mm for most of my wedding details shots. Having come from the Canon world where I owned the 35mm 1.4L I was never impressed with the Sony Zeiss 35mm 1.4. I picked up this one and it gets the job done in fine fashion! It joins my 28mm f2, 55mm 1.8, and 85mm 1.8 to make up one of the lightest wedding kits ever!
That sounds about right. Nice setup!
Nice! Do you use a dual camera setup?
@@ZioComposite A7R4 and A9! I have the A73 as well, but it's been relegated to backup/personal use...
Brian Copeland I just picked this bad boy up used. I didn’t not think it was over priced for size and focus but for those complaining it’s going for $600 all day on eBay now. eBay charging tax now which takes away from some of the savings. Plan on using this plus the 85 for weddings now. I might sell my 55 now which will break my heart. The 35 is just that job and the coverage is more ideal for me. Tamron 28-75 is my back up just I case something goes wrong. Have had camera fail but never a lens. But as you know weddings you have to be prepared. How has your experience been in the field with it. I have not had a chance to put it to work yet but got some events coming up.
@@jamesjackson4264 why not buy from amazon or other sites then? and there is black friday coming soon!
Really excited to get this lens. Canceled the 35 GM lens for this one as this lens seams to be more reliable for both video and photos.
I've done exactly the same, I literally got bored of waiting for the gm
I have this lens and it's my first choice for low light shooting. You need to buy a Sony G or GM to get weather sealing.
I see this focal length gaining in popularity. It’s great for editorial fashion shoots. It does a great job when shooting professional models but when shooting people that look like I do (aka non-model material) it’s not my first choice. It’s great at exaggerating flaws. In a few of my Zoom range lenses I have 35mm like in my 16-35 and 28-75 but I find I barely use 35mm for some reason. I would guess I won’t be getting this lens but it does look like a great option for those that do shoot in this focal length.
as you said you don't use a 35mm you're more like a 50mm guy, and I get it, but if you use the 85mm and the 35mm maybe on 2 different cameras, then you'll feel like immortal, that's how I feel like since I got the 35mm
Haha love this
nice video you have just answered most of my question, my only question is not answered is I would like to know if I can use this lens for Live streaming... I have subscribed and I like to see more video of yours...keep up the good work
You absolutely could but you would probably need a good size space as typically you'll use something a bit wider. Cheers
@@StefanMalloch thanks for the quick reply.. My room is normal size cando bedroom all wide open background about 4 by 6 foot room behind me..
I had a samyang 35 1.4 but it broke when I dropped it, but then I purchased the Sony 24mm GM and by far it is my most used lens, aside from my 85 gm. I don't think I can go back to a 35mm anymore.
If I need it, I can always use crop mode on my a7riii :)
Nice... I'm considering on making the upgrade from the Samyang f2.8 to this Sony f1.8.
This lens does have a mount gasket. A tiny thin 'O' ring that sits ever so slightly proud. Probably enough to seal it from water given the tight fit and precision finish of the metal mount. In their promotional material Sony claim it to be dust and moisture resistant but with this footnote "Not guaranteed to be 100% dust and moisture proof." So I wouldn't shoot in the pouring rain with it or with any Sony camera except the A9 and A99.
I actually prefer the 45mm f1,8 lens by samyang which is also light weight & significantly cheaper. I also have a Mir 35mm f2 (based on zeiss design) and gives quality rendering. I do however think thatthe sony 35mm f1.8 is a good value lens if one makes use of its AF features - which is why it is more expensively priced (af motor) and because there is no other lightweight lens in this category. But as I do a lot of manual focus compositional work + the 45mm is a very niceFL I went in for the samyang instead
Giti Thadani I had the tamron 45mm when I was shooting Nikon. 45mm is a slept on focal length. I do prefer 35 but that 45mm is banging.
Great review. I'm picking up this one today!
Thanks for the video. I am still waiting to get my hands on this one. Might do a comparison between this and the Samyang 45mm
Yes this is an fantastic allround lens! One of my favorites! Very good for potraits and landscapes. Always with me!
Should I get the 35mm f1.8 or the 55mm f1.8? I already have the tamron 17-28
You should buy the Tamron 28-75 as a complement to the wide angle lens you already have. After using it for a while you will then be able to decide what focal length of a prime lens will work best for you if you actually need one. Good luck!
I have owned if for nearly a month now, and finally went out and took some shots with it on my A7R3. For a $450 lens, it would be considered a great lens, but for $750, it just isn't worth it. The vignetting is significant even up to F5.6 (I seldom shoot beyond F5.6), and there is significant green fringing. It is sharp, but the bokeh isn't amazing given the cost. The AF is great though. I like the 35mm focal length for my walk around lens, so it will stay in my bag on a regular basis. At this point, I am not interested in going with the Sigma's because of the weight (and cost of the 1.2). At $450 I would give it 9/10 stars, but at $750 it is more like 7.5/10.
Its cheaper in Canada because of the trade wars currently in the US.
The fringing is simply unacceptable and the transition between fully out of focus backgrounds and in focus planes are quite terrible as well for this price tag indeed
The 2.8 is at 800, I’m missing something here?,..
@@charruaporelmundothe 2.8za was never a competitive lens to begin with, but also, it has slightly better color rendering and is significantly better in CA. Also the price really depends on where you look as it is only about 475 usd in Australia
hey! Would you recommend buying the 55mm 1.8 or this lens the 35mm 1.8 for events and everyday use?
I have the 24mm, 55mm, and 85mm and for events and everyday use I'd say the 35mm. I I initially had the 85mm for portraits and thought it was too tight for environmental and full body shots so I got the 55m, I still feel like it can be a little tight at times and just wish I can have all lens available. I feel the 35mm is the best for just everyday use as you can always walk up close for people photos with some distortion
I pre ordered it. So far so good.
Good choice!
I feel like there should be a rule; every lens over ＄500 gets a gasket.
Amen!
I agree with that for sure.
Dont know why they dont add it to every lens, its just rubber worth .20 cents or less
just mike I’d gladly pay an extra $100 for that 20cent gasket.
just got mine today :)
This lens is sharper than my 85 mm f/1.8 and gives crisp images.
Insanely sharp lens!
I see you also have a review of the samyang 35 1.4. Which one do you prefer, the sony or the samyang?
The Samyang is not as portable so it depends on usage. For photography alone, I enjoyed the samyang. Good for video too but maybe not as reliable as the native Sony.
Stefan Malloch if you only have to choose one lens as a hybrid shooter, weight not included in the reason, which one would you prefer?
I’m amaze with it sharpness too, I pair it with the planar, lens that I love too. Do you know if the Distagon is as sharp as this 1.8?, or better color rendition?...
Hi, I'm in doubt to buy the Sony 35mm 1.8 or the Sigma 35mm 1.4, which would be the best option? regards !
Both nice. The Sony is made with video in mind so consider that if you shoot video. Do you need F1.4?
@@StefanMalloch I mainly want it for portrait photography and events. I'm considering doing some video clips in the near future.
Cheers!
@@SebasCortes.PH. with what lense did you go?
Wide open is wide open no matter what the aperture. f/1.8 is plenty of light and shallow DOF for a 35mm lens. The fact you have a very sharp lens wide open is a huge plus and something not many lenses offer. When using normal to telephoto lenses a larger aperture makes more sense. A 35 is on the normal side of wide angle and is not a lens that is always shot at the widest aperture. Having a deeper DOF is more useful. The wider a lens gets the smaller the focal point or subject is. This is why most wide landscapes are shot at f8 and beyond as is street photography. It’s as if once a photographer learns how to achieve bokeh they simply cannot stop. If you look at some of the greatest street photographers you’ll see much of the image is in focus. My point here is that the f/1.8 for a 35mm lens might just be the perfect lens/aperture available.
Did you see the Astigmatism (Astro) and the harsh bokeh? Its a 800 bucks lens...
do you notice something sliding inside the lens when you flip it up and down?
I think that's normal. That's what Sony told me.
Is this better than the Sigma 35mm F1.4 Stefan? In between the two but leaning Sigma because I already have filter sizes for 67mm
How did you decide? Asking myself the same. I especially want to know it compares to the Sigma in terms of image quality and AF
@@shutterpp1108 I have the sigma right now and I love it man. I went with Sigma because I have the filter sizes for it already and Sigma offers awesome image quality/sharpness. The AF is reliable in 95% of the cases. Might be a little slower than native Sony lenses but its still good. If you do portraits, avoid shooting into the sun because this lens has lots of trouble doing that.
What light did you use to light your home studio video?
Probably the SL-60W which is my main light. Links in description.
If I shoot video, should I choose 35 f1.8 or 55 f1.8. Thank you
Actually, there is a very small rubber gasket. Very easy to miss it, and probably gives just some protection. Use your finger nail to press in and locate it. This is not present in the FE 85F1.8.
I'm a month late but I've posted similar information today before reading yours.
stefan, do you know the rokinon 35 mm 1.5?? Leaving aside that it is manual focus, what do you think of it? I was trying to find in your reviews something related to this lens. But, I did not find anything
Havnt seen it sorry. I don't use manual lenses very much. AF is too good these days
Can weather sealing be added by the consumer?
Torn between this or the batis 25 f2..
I already own a zeiss 55mm, which is great but I’d like something a little wider.
I feel like the 35 is more of an allround lens, but it could also be too close (same) to the 55..
The 25 would go well with the 55. And the 35 actually sits somewhere in between that, not wide enough, not close enough.
But like I said, if I’m searching for an allround/everyday lens the 35 just makes more sense.
I don’t know what would you do :)
Like I said, I'm not a huge 35mm prime shooter but its growing on me. Seems to tick a lot of boxes. Very sharp and good for video too.
I have the 25mm f2 and the 35mm . The 35mm is sharper all around . The 25mm has better colors As most Zeiss lens do . I am going to list my 25mm on ebay soon . As i feel like this 35mm will be on my camera ALOT . I enjoy it that much .
LT this is why I prefer the 35mm focal length for a lot of things. 50 always seems too short or too long. There’ve only been a couple of instances in years of shooting where I thought, “man, a 50 is just what I need right at this moment” that a 35 couldn’t accomplish. It’s simply a more versatile focal length imo.
The way I see it folks have a few choices for a prime kit. 18, 35, 85 or 24, 50 and 135 if you like shooting long.
I don't know if I am the only one but I can feel things moving inside the lens when I turn it upside down . The movements stops when the lens is attached to the lens and the camera is ON. Is it a problem or is this normal ?
You're not alone. I felt it as well and was a bit surprised. Lens works great but with no IS, its a head scratcher.
@@StefanMalloch Yea. I feel it might be the focusing motor. It does not happen that much on the 16-35 f/4 or my 85 mm f/1.8 . So I am a little surprised. I was thinking whether I had bumped it accidentally. Generally I am quite delicate with my lenses. But at least someone else also faced the same scenario.
I confirm, the 35mm does that moving thing inside the lens. It is weird but the lens works perfectly
I have seen other people who have had the same problem on RUclips. One guy sent it back to Sony for warranty, contact support asap.
it makes that noise witheverybody's 35 lens, not sure if sending it back to sony is the right thing to do, I'll wait till sony will talk about it
Ok Quick question, Anyone who owns this lens. When not mounted. does your element inside move around?
Joseph Doherty I don.t think it does.
Perfectly normal
Have your tried your hands on Laowa lenses?? Would love to check their 100mm f2.8 macro
I have not had the pleasure! Their extreme macro lenses get some good reviews though!
Hey thanks for this video. I really wanna buy this lens but have one question. If I'm shooting it on the a7iii and got the aspc 35mm crop button (would make it look like a 50mm) will I lose any quality?
Thanks!
In crop mode it will have a 1.5x crop and be a 52.5mm equivalent. It will drop your resolution down to 10mp.
@@StefanMalloch Are you referring to the aps-c 35mm setting?
@@StefanMalloch pero para video con 8 mp es suficiente para 4k, e incluso para fotografía sin recorte para internet, ya que no pasamos los 1920xp, yo tengo el lente, también el 85 y con esos hago de todo en fotografía y video, muy buena combinación la recomiendo.
but, it does not havfe an aperture ring, so how, do I quickly adjust that ? on, lets say a SONY fx6 ? any custom buttions, perhaps ?
Just received my 35mm 1.8 FE and something I noticed right out of the box is when I rotate it in my hand (top to bottom and bottom to top) I feel something moving inside. Is that normal? I tried the same thing with a couple of my other Sony lenses and I do not feel something moving inside.
it has a floating element inside. it's normal
Thank you for the info
Totally normal.
Hello, what about focus in dark ?
What´s kinda weird about the bokeh is that it´s more visible on the top half of the bokeh ball. The 85 has the same effect or whatever you wanna call it.
I wish to like this video 10x
Excited for this lens! Switching from tammy 28-75
Both great! Can't go wrong either way.
I sold my Tammy 28-75 to get this lens also!
Yes ..& thats without even watching the video...
Don't understand lots of people praising this lens, meanwhile lots of people not happy with this lens.
Great review and samples!
Image quality comparison between this vs Voigtlander 35mm 1.4 v.1?
Beast Mode it’s going to be hard to beat voight character. I do think the 35mm FE is better do to the if you do t have time to autofocus. I have let people mirror me before with manual lenses and they take all day which is a pain for me and the subject. But if you know what you are doing the voight will serve you well.
Please use a lavalier mic. Audio is distracting.
Awesome review man thanks!
You bet bud. Happy to help!
Samyang 35mm af 1.4 or sony 35mm 1.8?....
Definitely Sony. I lost all respect for samyang when they sent me a Non-focusing...basically broke 35mm AF lens...
Will be getting the Sony version
Ian Lester the Sony for sure. I love love love the samyang output but it’s big and slower auto. While for portraits it does not matter. Events it does. I had not problem with the samyang for the price and what you get. What the Sony 35 does is let you shout without having the newer bodies. Can get a cheaper backup.
james jackson copy that thanks for the reply, now I know which one to get 👌
I don't like the fact that the inside elements are loose when the lens is not powered or attached to camera body. That's not normal to me. Even though Sony says it is OK.
Good lens
Hi Stefan,
Loved the review !
BTW - I just got my copy today and noticed some minor specs on the glass ( which are not dust - couldn't remove them with lens pen )
Attached in the picture drive.google.com/file/d/1WwWbwJcXFChLo5TafNYjnErgY2iyIIff/view?usp=sharing
Do you think I should ask for a replacement or is it common to have minor blemishes as such ?
I took some shots with it and couldn't notice anything in the photos.
Thanks for your advise !
Sorry but this lens is actually AMAZING.
Overpriced they should of done a Sony/Zeiss version like the 55 1.8.
There is a Sony Zeiss 35mm 1.4 for about 1.400€
1K likes by me 🥰
I love this lens, but the bokeh can’t challenge 85mm prime lens. 85mm much better.
when i hear 700 dollar is not cheap.. dude have you seen the rest? they're at least 500+ more
🏆🏆🏆💯💯💯💯💯
Sigma 35mm Art f1.4 is Sharper at $625.