How to make an Inquisitor (Paladin-Rogue Multiclass) in DnD 5e - Build Guide
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 апр 2024
- Unlock the ultimate power of darkness and light with our definitive guide on building the Inquisitor, a masterful Paladin and Rogue multiclass character for your next adventure! This video is your key to mastering the art of blending the holy might of the Paladin with the cunning stealth of the Rogue. Dive deep into the mechanics of multiclassing, optimal ability score distributions, skill selections, and the strategic synergy between Paladin's divine smite and Rogue's sneak attack. Learn how to navigate through your campaign, balancing between righteousness and deceit, to uphold justice or pursue your own ends. Whether you're battling through dungeons or navigating the intricate politics of the realm, this guide ensures your Inquisitor stands unmatched. Perfect for D&D enthusiasts, RPG gamers, and anyone looking to enhance their tabletop gameplay. Don't forget to hit like, subscribe, and ring the bell for more epic character builds and gaming tips. Your quest for the ultimate Inquisitor begins now!
Share your builds in the comments or on our Discord: / discord 
Игры
"man it sucks that the Paladin cant sneak around"
"Well what were you expecting? The Spanish Inquisition?"
*door breaks down*
„NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!!!”
This is a cool character idea, unfortunately I can guarantee no-one is going to play it like an Assassin's creed type, and also guarantee that you will go insane form all the "No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!"s you hear all game.
Lol that's probably true!
When I did this, I ended up starting rogue, ending up with a Paladin (Oath of the Watchers) 7/ Rogue (inquisitive) 13 split.
Gets you a bunch of ASIs so you can pick up feats, a decent amount of damage, skills, and makes it a very well rounded character in the end that thematically just really fits. It's fun. Not the best in damage or anything, but when you're sussing out those criminals and fiends, you're more focused on your mind than your blade.
Did this build with a dark elf and got an unexpected fun bonus. The fairy fires spell gives advantage on all attacks against the affected creature for up to 1 minute which set off my sneak attack, even if no allies were no near by. It is a concentration spell so war caster may be a good feat and you could pick the spell up other ways but I like the free option from Dark Elf which does not take away from my spell slots I use to smite with. I was also able to use my heritage, the darkness spell with intimidation for some fun RP sessions. Great overall build. I really enjoyed playing this char.
That's a good call. I love free spells for builds like this or warlocks. Drow magic as a feat is a great grab too.
On a similar note, I had a Fighter/Battlemaster+Rogue/Inquisitor that I ran as a Force Recon specialist. He'd get in close and either distract the baddies or just hit the big bad hard while the others rush in. He had enough HP to survive 2 rounds while surrounded and deal a s__t ton of damage. Out of combat, nothing could get past the combination of Expertise in Perception, Investigation, and Insight, plus the Observant feat and the Eye for Detail and Ear for Deception skills, pretty much no one could hide from or lie to him. The only thing that he couldn't see were creatures with the special ability to be completely undetectable until they attack ... and even then, they couldn't surprise him.
I prefer the swashbuckler/paladin multiclass. It leans into the Cha and gives you an initiative boost. AT doesn't really help you with its enchantment/illusion restrictions. And I would start in Rogue for the extra skills. Swashbuckler also allows you to use sneak attack when you 1 v.1 someone. And then there is Panche. Charming people can get you info and Intimidating people in combat is pretty inquisitor. You don't need magic. You have a couple of smites per day and sneak attack every round. Medium armor is good enough and flexible enough to grab the medium armor master feat to sneak and get that +3 for your AC. With defensive fighting style and a shield, even scale armor gets you a 20 on your AC. But let's be real, we want half plate. 5+3+2+1 is a nice 21. Once you feel like you have enough sneak attack (+5d6?) You can switch back to paladin or lean into charisma more and go a couple levels in divine soul sorcerer or bard if you want. Full caster Cha classes pair nicely with paladins and still give you that religious feel.
Actively working on this (minus the caster) to have a true inquisitor in my Drakkenheim campaign!
I believe his reason for Arcane Trickster was more spell slots, thus more smites.
Load EverQuest 2, select Priest, subclass Inquisitor!
Tossed you a sub. Keep making content!
I’m playing this build in a current campaign and agree it’s a lot of fun. I did two levels of Rogue first, then two level of Paladin, then back to Rogue, but essentially the same. I picked up Sentinel feat and I get quite a few sneak attacks on my reaction which is nice and boosts overall damage. It’s a pretty different role for me but I’m really enjoying it.
A Rogue/Paladin build I had thought of doing is an Inquisitive Rogue and Vengeance Paladin as a sort of Vengeful Hunter type with a personal Oath to punish those in power who misuse their power such as using it to increase their own wealth at the detriment of those less fortunate in their city/town/etc., while using the abilities of the Inquisitive Rogue to spot the weaknesses in their target to take full advantage of. Never really thought of a Level spread between them though, but Rogue would be the starting Class I had in mind.
This is a pretty good approach. For a one-shot, I think this is solid. If you were trying to do this in a campaign though, I think there needs to be a few tweaks. Since you can't use Int for spells anyway, dump it and add that back to wisdom, which are more common saves. If you have the option for a first level feat, I would go half-elf for the extra +1 and grab magic initiate to get booming blade and green flame blade.
Also, going spell caster after 11th level is a very viable option, because you will pick up more spell slots for smite. Sorcerer would give you meta magic, the shadow sorcerer would be good flavor, and very useful for a rogue. Warlock would get you spell slots that recharge on a short rest, and some pacts that could add more durability. Bard would give you more slots, utility, you could go swords for eventual extra attack.
Yeah, there's a lot to consider table to table but these are all good points. Full caster exclusively for smite slots is a solid call. The build I personally played was elf with double bladed scimitar, so 2 smites per turn with this build, but I know many tables don't use eberron stuff.
I did a similar build, but inverse in level priority (Swashbuckler 3, Conquest 7, expertise in perception and investigation) which used a whip and musket from horseback.
I wanted at least 5 in Paladin for the "Find Steed" feature, and the extra attack, to focus on the "A man on a horse is physically and spiritually bigger than one who is not." aspect, and with steady aim on a horse, you're getting advantage every attack while keeping your mobility since your horse is doing the moving. When you're close, you can swap to the crack of a whip, when you're afar, you can bring the loud thunder of your judgement with a musket, which is just flavor, but it really carries the "Fear" inducing side of an inquisitor. There's also the rapier and crossbows when you need to swap to stealth and keep it quiet, covert operations and investigations, since all of it is carried by dex, it works perfectly.
While I chose Swashbuckler (To double dip on bonuses from Charisma between the two classes), due to being on horseback most of the time, I found the features to rarely apply (Steady Aim already helps enable sneak attack, and you're often not close enough for it to trigger, using a whip or musket keeps you 5 feet further than it wants you), so all I really got was the initiative bonus, which, is certainly great, but ultimately felt lacking. If I remade the character I'd like to try Mastermind, Proficiency in disguises, forgery, gaming set, and two languages is very flavorful for an inquisitor, and very much assists charisma based checks, making it more useful outside combat, but then in combat, the ability to use help as a bonus action from 30 feet away, is great, using your presence to guide the wrath of your allies to strike true. Of course, you give up your steady aim for your bonus action, but if you're using Mounted Combatant, there's a high chance that you'll still have that advantage. Whip, smite, sneak attack, and then help to make sure your next ally can keep the punishment going, you're the inquisitor, you've marked the target, and now judgement will be dealt.
Love it! Thanks for posting this... I had a dwarf inquisitor in a PF1 campaign many years back. When I tried to recreate him for D&D 5E, I had a bit of trouble, especially at low levels. Rogue-Paladin is the way I went too, although I spent my levels a bit differently. I started with Rogue for the extra skill points, chose Spy for background (working for the Church!), and switched to Paladin at 4th level... at 3rd level, I chose Inquisitive subclass for Rogue. At 7th, I went back to Paladin for one level to get Vengeance, since I was the righteous retribution of the Church. And I've only worked him up to 8th level, so still debating where to go from here.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I'm trying it in my session next week, Can't wait many thanks!
Hope you enjoy it!
Never had a chance to play d&d but have read about classes, and it reminds me a bit of the Avenger from 4E player handbook 2.
I can kinda see this as a npc where they would work with the BBEG or be a red herring character.
Oooh, love the idea of this as a BBEG! Especially if you introduce new abilities and hints through the campaign.
I like it as a secondary antagonist, Think Bruce Willis from The Seige.
If you do take another level in Paladin, I'd suggest Oath of Vengeance, because the Hunters Mark spell allows you to track your target for HOURS!
Fun call!
@@fellstardm "No one escapes the inquisition!"
I actually made an inquisitor that's more generic by following the vibes and using the background from the Innistrad background. He's a Inquisitive Rogue / Monster Hunter Ranger and I hope to use him for a Curse of Strahd play through
Love that combo idea too. That sounds more Witcher than Inquisitor to me, but it really falls into RP at that point. Hope it plays well!
Ikr?
I heard someone play as a cleric that was an Inquisitor too. Seems like as long as you work for the church in the RP, I suppose.
Fun concept and lots of flavour! If I were to do it, I'd probably just go 3 levels of rogue and the rest Paladin. Maybe crown for spirit guardians. Or I'd skip rogue all together and either take skill expert for sneaky stuff, or go Bard a few levels for that expertise.
Booming Blade will only work with a whip if you're attacking adjacent enemies (not using reach) since the spell has a Self 5' range.
True. It is why I recommend the rapier as our weapon, but sometimes a little range is more valuable than the extra damage.
Elven Accuracy would probably do more for you than the Piercer feat since you’re crit fishing. It’s an easy pick up since you’re a high elf.
Great call!
3.5 had the order of illumination
Shadowbane Inquisitor ( paladin/rogue)
Shadowbane stalker (cleric/rogue)
I think someone could play a character based on St. Peter very well with this build.
This gives me a few ideas.
So, I made a hexblade warlock picked up the heavily armed feat for heavy armor proficiency and made myself a pseudo paladin.
A cool idea I've been cooking up for a gestalt camping is a college of swords bard, battle master fighter mix, where the whole flavor is a fan dancer, its ot perfect yet, but it may be a cool idea for you to try!
That sounds like a neat idea. I haven't explored much in the gestalt build world and that sounds super fun. I know most DMs shy away from that kind of power.
Most people ignore that finesse does not require you to use dex it give you the option to use dex.
"When making an attack with a finesse weapon, you use your choice of your Strength or Dexterity modifier for the attack and damage rolls. You must use the same modifier for both rolls."
Sneak attack merely requires a weapon to have the finess property. Not to use dex
100% correct. Unfortunately, Dex is just a significantly more useful stat. Between Saves & Initiative, then Thieves tools, Stealth, Sleight of Hand, Acrobatics, and cheap AC, it is hard to pick using Strength unless you're going to the full commitment to a polearm/greatsword/greataxe + heavy armor.
I went 2 paladin/2 rogue/ 6 bladesinger to get some more damage on the board. For 11 I probably would have grabbed assassin for more nova damage.
I wish assassin wasn't so DM dependent though.
Huh. I did paladin rogue but not as an inquisitor. I played him more like Javert from Les Miserable.
He was born in a jail and rose through the ranks with the law as his guide and God but would put himself by danger going undercover for example.
Part of me wishes there was an official finesse bludgeoning weapon so you could justify using Crusher with this build. Sure, you can imitate this using Thunderous Smite (if you got a decent Charisma for it anyway), but the idea of at-will forced movement with Booming Blade just sounds a lot more fun. I know you can just do it without any sort of Sneak Attack, but where's the fun in that?
Yeah, it is kinda disappointing. When I DM, I offer my players the option of a Blackjack. It is just a shortsword (d6) with bludgeoning instead of piercing/slashing. No one picks it because rapier is d8.
@@fellstardm I would carry one because skeletons. Might not see much use, but I'd have it. Plus if someone made me leave my fancy sword at the door, they might not take my little stick.
May I submit sorcerer to follow the paladin/rogue levels if you're playing this at high tiers? Draconic ancestry gives you effectively free Mage Armor that can't be dispelled, and 3 levels into sorc allows you to cast Mirror Image as a bonus action which makes you incredibly tanky (or only 2 levels if you took it as one of your Arcane Trickster spells). Another benefit is that as a full caster you'll start to rack up those spell slots for smites. You'll also eventually get Fly (which you can also quicken).
How would switching Arcane Trickster out for Swashbuckler change this build? would that possibly help give more damage through more consistent sneak attack?
It would give more sneak attack uptime as the cost of lowering smite slots. Along with some other minor trades.
How would you do this with a Ranged idea of this? Like using Hand Crossbow/Gun. Since you can't use Divine Smite on Ranged attacks?
Short answer: I wouldn't/you can't.
Long answer: Drop the 2 levels of paladin, pick up 5 levels of Hex blade warlock, pact of the blade. Get thirsting blade and Eldritch smite. That works with ranged weapons. And you can focus on charisma over dex for RP and use medium armor. It is a much different build though, still could be fun.
What did you use to make the character in the video?
That's just the roll20 charactermancer
He’s also forgetting a huge part of the Arcane Trickster archetype, you only get to pick very few non-illusion/enchantment school spells maybe abseils choice OR find familiar but certainly not both.
It is a weirdly worded section and we went over it in another comment (I should probably pin it).: You know three 1st-level wizard spells of your choice, two of which you must choose from the enchantment and illusion spells on the wizard spell list.
You can get shield easily. But you then you can get find familiar from Magic Initiate or Ritual caster. It is a minor oversight on my end.
Ryan Reynolds?! When did you become a DnD youtuber?!
Maybe the bald Deadpool version.
The mint mobile bankrupted hom.
I would have gone vengeance paladin assassin rouge. Auto crit smites on a surprised target. Vow of enmity means sneak attack is always on during combat.
I dislike assassin rogue because it is so DM dependent and so many don't know how to run surprise. It makes it hard to recommend to a wide audience. And vow of enmity would provide sneak attack against 1 target, not all of combat. Otherwise, yes, good calls.
Fallen paladin/assassin could it work
Can this build work if you replace Paladin with Cleric?
Clerics can't smite on demand, so that would be a completely different build.
running rogue 3/oathbreaker pally rest on bg3
that's a great combo for bg3!
lawful evil
Maybe this is a dumb nit pick and i don't want to come across as condescending or anything. But i think you got confused with the arcane trickster's spell limitations. Your cantrips can be any two (plus mage hand) from the wizard spell list. The level spells are the ones restricted to enchantment and illusion, so you wouldn't be able to use Mage Armor, or Find Familiar, etc.
Interesting, maybe I misread it. Thanks for clarifying.
@@fellstardm Lmao. I got confused too. I was just reading through it and i stand corrected. Turns out, we were both wrong and right at the same time. I'll leave the text here for anyone that may read it. It goes like this:
*Cantrips:* You learn three cantrips: mage hand and two other cantrips of your choice from the wizard spell list.
*Spells known of 1st-Level and Higher.* You know three 1st-Level wizard spells of your choice, TWO OF WHICH you must choose from the enchantment and illusion spells on the wizard spell list.
Therefore, yes, you can pick any two cantrips, and you're restriced to enchantment and illusion leveled spells, _however_ you got one free choice. So you were right in that you can pick Shield, Mage Armor or Find Familiar, although one has to choose which, as you can't learn them all at 3rd level.
Gotta love WOTC wording. In this case, I recommend Find Familiar for the owl flyby advantage to enable sneak attack regularly. Because we have a paladin start, we get heavy armor and plate is equivalent to max dex mage armor and can be magical. Shield is nice, but less important because of uncanny dodge as a reaction. Nice catch though!
@@fellstardm Yeah, or if your character ends up more roguish than paladin(ish?) you could use an infiltrator animal to scout ahead before barging in and breaking skulls. And it may still give advantage. I think that this is RAW, but if your DM is cool you could have a spider familiar climb on you, and the help action could be justified by it coming out of your mouth or something shocking like that. And then hiding inside your armor so they can't hit it.
Bro, what happened to Ryan Reynold's voice?
I heard Deadpool really took it out of him
@fellstardm 😂
Makes sense. Nice video, by the way! Love the idea.
This build 100% wants to be Str-focused with medium armour and max 14 Dex. Start Rogue for the additional skill prof and Int Save prof (no illusion will cloud your eyes), but take no more than 5 levels, the rest Paladin. Half-orc will give you free Intimidation and improves offence and defence. Assassin Rogue gives you free 1st turn crits for your smites. Vengeance offers Hunters Mark, Haste and some bonus movement, as well as advantage on all your attacks via Vow of Enmity. Way better "inquisitor" stylr character in my eyes.
I wouldn't go more than 3 levels of rogue, personally. Uncanny dodge is nice, but every level of paladin that you give up is painful. Also, Polearm mastery is just blatantly too powerful a feat to ignore for this build, since you can sneak attack on your turn, then sneak attack again with the attack of opp it grants, and that will be eating your reaction anyway.
Sneak attack requires you use a finesse weapon, so PAM doesn't work for it.
@@fellstardm Ah, you're totally right. I missed that. Must be old 3e rules bleeding over in my head.
@@CatacombD happens all the time, lots of specifics to keep track of
The rapier is not the best weapon for a rogue. It actually is the second best. The best is the double bladed scimitar...
If your table plays with Eberron content. Many don't.
@@fellstardm you didn't specify "not Eberron content" though. You were talking in general, so I was correct. It is not the best weapon
I thought this was 40k
Why?
Even a rogue build named "Inquisitor" doesnt take the "Inquisitive" subclass. 😬
Nope, needed the spell slots
If you are playing an inquistor and you pick anything but inquisitve what are you even doing. Its a wosdom based rogue with the entire theme of an inquistor. An inquistor can technically be any class but i feel you really missed the mark here.
Well that's the beauty of dnd character creation I guess. Lots of options and I'm definitely not the only one making these things, so somebody probably made the version you think is best. That's part of what makes it fun.
Anyone that plays D&D 5e probably wears tampons.
At least there was an attempt at originality. 6/10 insult.
@@fellstardm Tampax appreciates your support.
@@know_not_wickedness Can they send a coupon or something? I'm accepting sponsorship.