Rafale is better than Eurofighter Typhoon ? Comparison video.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 июн 2024
  • In this video, we will compare two strong fighter jets one is from France and another is from the European Union. Share your thoughts about both fighter jets.
    Follow us on social sites
    Facebook: / jetlinemarve. .
    Twitter: / jetline_marvel​​​
    Instagram: / jetlinemarv. .
    RUclips: ruclips.net/channel/UChub....
    www.jetlinemarvel.net
    Website : www.jetlinemarvel.net
    Which is better? Airbus A320 neo or Boeing 737-8 max
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwjfF....
    The Most Powerful Passports Of 2019
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-XOY....
    Which is Bigger ? Antonov AN225 vs Airbus A380
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKAcH....
    Luxurious Helicopter cabin tour : Part 5
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3Ihe....
    Top SIX Airlines in India - 2019 : by its Market share, Punctuality , Fleet size, Destinations.
    Baltic Aviation Academy, TRTO, Type rating training, Full Flight Simulator, FFS, Airbus A320, A320, Cold and Dark, Cockpit, Airplane, Pilot, ATPL, Simulator
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrVbD....
    The 10 Best Airports In The World In 2019: Skytrax Awards
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0pZY....
    HAL Helicopter Ambulance displays at Aero-India 2019
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODJex....
    #rafale #eurofightertyphoon #Fighterjet #aircraft

Комментарии • 49

  • @happyslappy5203
    @happyslappy5203 23 дня назад +15

    In 1976 France built the Mirage 4000: delta wing, 2 jet engines, canards just above the air intakes. Its design was the ancestor of both Rafale & Eurofighter. 1st flight on March 9, 1979, way before the Eurofighter (march 1994). France pulled out of the Eurofighter project when other involved countries said they didn't need a carrier-capable fighter. For French Navy it was non negotiable because they operated then 2 CATOBAR aircraft carriers. So France made the Rafale on its own, but with a modified design (reinforced fuselage, air intakes, canard position, landing gear, tailhook...). Rafale is certified for operating on US Navy aircraft carriers since 2007.

    • @jay1st1st
      @jay1st1st 22 дня назад +2

      Exactly what i was going to say.
      Rafale is compact, separate air intakes, the landing gear fits in the fuselage keeping the wings clear for max hard points, front LG is not below the weak air intake for hard landings on aircraft carriers.

  • @CROM-on1bz
    @CROM-on1bz 22 дня назад +10

    Let's say that the best is the one that sells the most to countries that did not build the plane and if foreign customers buy more Rafale than EF Typhoon it is surely for a good reason.

    • @antoniotorcoli5740
      @antoniotorcoli5740 20 дней назад +2

      I think that Rafale is superior but the sales are not a compelling factor proving its superiority. Typhoon it is difficult to sale since it is produced by a consortium of countries and each member can veto a sale.

    • @CROM-on1bz
      @CROM-on1bz 20 дней назад

      @@antoniotorcoli5740 😏😏

    • @philv3941
      @philv3941 19 дней назад

      Fair point. ​@@antoniotorcoli5740

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 17 дней назад +1

      Eurofighter Typhoon do not sell well for reasons that are political rather than ability.
      1. Rafale is ITAR FREE
      2. Germany also Sanctioned sales to Saudi Arabia and Turkey ( a bit vague on the Turkey deal )
      Would you buy from a consortium that wants to lend you an umbrella when it's sunny but takes it back when it rains?.
      Remember what you wish for as Rafale has a Franco German Spanish replacement ( France/ Dassault don't want a flip flop partner but are stuck with one now....guess who )
      Remember your history books....P51 was slated for it's low ceiling and poor climb rate until it used the RR Merlin then it became the best piston fighter of the war. Likewise modifications alter the performance of aircraft throughout the life cycle. F15 is past 50 years and still relevant.

  • @user-ls5zb2dx5j
    @user-ls5zb2dx5j 21 день назад +7

    Nice video, but you make one mistake, the rafale has longer ferry range then the typhoon.

  • @denismichel8385
    @denismichel8385 18 дней назад +5

    Typhoon has more agility. Are you sure ? This is not the impression I have when I watch air shows.

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 16 дней назад +3

      Rafale is designed for carrier landing therefore it must have good safe low speed handling. Hence the close coupled canards. That gives excellent airshow capability. EFT has it's canard position much further away from it's centre of gravity to give leverage at transonic speeds, were the fighting is done, hence it can pull 9g turns constantly until Mach 1.2 with 2 fuel tanks and missiles. It also has better TTW with more powerful engines so it can outrun and outclimb opponents. Gripen has close coupled canards for its roadside party piece. These are intentional design choices and help make the aircraft fulfil it's potential mission.

  • @MilkaSingh-rt6zp
    @MilkaSingh-rt6zp 22 дня назад +8

    French do not make many different weapons but whatever they make are top class, there is just no comparison with any other country in its classes, be it American, German or Russian

    • @happyslappy5203
      @happyslappy5203 21 день назад +9

      France is the only one country in Europe able to build on its own: nuclear aircraft carrier, strategic nuclear submarines, nuclear attack submarines, frigates, amphibious assault ships, replenishment vessels, ICBMs, air-launched nuclear cruise missiles, omnirole carrier-capable jet fighter, attack helicopters, MBTs, APCs, IFVs, AA missiles, military satellites.. M51 ballistic missile carries six to ten independently targetable thermonuclear warheads, 110 kilotons each, 10,000+ km range, reentry at Mach 25, 150-200 metres accuracy.

    • @augustiner3821
      @augustiner3821 17 дней назад +1

      wow, what a bold statement, insider.

  • @filemonpuente1766
    @filemonpuente1766 19 дней назад +5

    👍Rafale🇨🇵 Frances.Hermoso,Moderno y Poderoso.El mejor multiroll 4.5 Generacion.

  • @user-MaxGrub
    @user-MaxGrub 22 дня назад +8

    La laideur du Typhoon est létale.

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 17 дней назад

      Rafale would look a 10 but it has a growth on its face ( some call it a fixed Refueling Probe ) and that lowers it's RCS also. The small nose gives a sleek look but allows the smallest radar of all. Sometimes it's better to look mean than pretty.

    • @caglar3957
      @caglar3957 7 дней назад

      Bunlar savaş makinesi spor otomobil değil.😂😂😂

  • @Paul-fp4ux
    @Paul-fp4ux 11 дней назад

    The Rafale is homogeneous and beautiful because it comes from a long and succesful lineage designed by a unique creator since 1929

  • @thiemokellner1893
    @thiemokellner1893 17 дней назад +1

    0:22 strange you show the Euro Fighter when you are talking about the Rafale then.

  • @atrides7
    @atrides7 14 дней назад +1

    RAFALE💎💎💎💎💎❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @Cfu72
    @Cfu72 18 дней назад +4

    Rafale .... the .best 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷

    • @oskng
      @oskng 17 дней назад +1

      Slazem se, i mi u hrvatskoj smo dobili prvi dio isporuke. Cestitam sto ste vi narucili i najnoviju verziju f4.1 uz f3r. Mi smo trenutno na f3r verziji

  • @wolfbleue4920
    @wolfbleue4920 22 дня назад +13

    The Rafale is vastly superior in all areas... moreover it has never lost a single match against a European opponent It is the only aircraft in the world that can carry 1x5 its own weight in armament and it is a multirole aircraft.. it has no rival in Europe 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵💪💪💪💪💪

    • @kaizenpsy8259
      @kaizenpsy8259 19 дней назад

      I knew since „vastly“ that the rest will be mostly nonsense. The aircraft’s are pretty similar and both are very capable. It’s actually not even true that the Rafale never lost a training fight. I have friends who fly or flew Typhoons, they won training fights against the Rafale they lost fights against them.

    • @oskng
      @oskng 17 дней назад +3

      ​@@kaizenpsy8259nisu isti, rafal je omni roll avion, dok tajfun nije. Tu sva prica staje

    • @kaizenpsy8259
      @kaizenpsy8259 17 дней назад +1

      @@oskng true the Rafale has wider spectrum of possible applications but in the applications they both capable of they are very equal.

    • @oskng
      @oskng 17 дней назад

      @@kaizenpsy8259 u biti si samo potvrdio sto sam ja napisao, ti si prakticki napisao "sto imaju isto, imaju, a rafal ima vise". Nista zlonamjerno sa moje strane, da me ne shvatis krivo.

    • @elrulio9889
      @elrulio9889 17 дней назад +1

      Omnirole aircraft *

  • @andrecolpron5603
    @andrecolpron5603 22 дня назад +3

    Mes oreilles saignent quand il prononce Rafale. 😱

    • @thiemokellner1893
      @thiemokellner1893 17 дней назад

      Les miens aussi, and I am not even French speaker.

  • @user-jr9qn9rc2e
    @user-jr9qn9rc2e 16 дней назад

    Typhoon is clearly designed focused on air interception/superiority. Its main advantage are its engines which are clearly more powerful than those of the Rafale - but this comes at a cost both in price and in maintenance. The smaller size of the Rafale (possibly due to the need to be carrier-compatible) has also player a role. Both aircrafts are weak regarding long term development compared to US counterparts which is reasonable since volumes of european fighters are traditionally much smaller. Although the sales of an aircfraft do not necessarily represent which one is better, the Rafale seems to have gained momentum towards the Typhoon, mainly due to its relatively lower price and maintenance costs and also due to its greater versatility. The main advantage of Rafale is that it is based in a consistent uniform philosophy since it was a one-country design with very focused specs whereas the Typhoon had to address multiple and not always compatible specs. Overall I would consider Typhoon a 'better' fighter on a spec-by-spec comparison but Rafale is clearly a better all-rounder (and most probably the best all-rounder worldwide as is essentially the only fighter designed from the beginning on that basis). Rafale is good in every aspect - not very powerful engines but powerful enough, decent radar, very good electronic warfare suite (very clever french move to focus on that), a decently stealthy design although not as advanced as the F-35 (but stealth comes at a considerable cost in other aspects...), great reliability (France does not have the luxury of a big fleet so losses are not acceptable...) and very good air-to-air missiles to compensate on the interception role. And as a whole package it comes at a price that can be justified, whereas Typhoon may not be so... . I believe that if Rafale gets more powerful powerplants (+10%, not more) and an upgraded radar (not that current AESA is bad but an upgrade will be needed to keep it competitive - although some 'nose widening' may also be considered for increased radar size - size does matter!) its capabilities will increase overall and this is one other of its benefits - you do not need to do that much to improve the original design.

  • @tomislavcukac9677
    @tomislavcukac9677 23 дня назад +3

    You have destroyed this video with myth that Serbia will buy Dassault Rafale soon. Dassault Rafale is sold out for 10 years 2024-2034.

    • @zagrepcanin82
      @zagrepcanin82 18 дней назад +2

      france would not sell them because they are afraid that serbia would tranfer technical data of jets and its weaponry to russia and/or china

    • @oskng
      @oskng 17 дней назад

      Ako francuzi prodaju srbima (genocidno, agresorskoj naciji) to bi doslovno bila potpuna izdaja prema natu. Jer svi znamo kako je potpuno glupo ovdje izjavljeno da su oni neutralni. Nije nikakva tajna kako se otvoreno svrstavaju uz rusiju i sjevernu koreju.

    • @Paul-fp4ux
      @Paul-fp4ux 10 дней назад

      @@zagrepcanin82 Yes the risk exists!

  • @noriko-nm8vc
    @noriko-nm8vc 18 дней назад +1

    私はタイフ―ンが好きです🎉

  • @alihanhaydar8369
    @alihanhaydar8369 24 дня назад

    Are they copy eachothers?

    • @Arleq1
      @Arleq1 24 дня назад +2

      Eurofighter is a bad copy of the Rafale indeed.

    • @allegromoderato7404
      @allegromoderato7404 21 день назад +3

      Non, ces deux avions sont totalement différents.
      Nous voulions un avion omni-rôle navalisé catapultable à partir d'un porte avion, alors qu' Airbus a développé un avion de supériorité aérienne..

    • @oskng
      @oskng 17 дней назад +2

      Na pocetku su zajedno krenuli, ali se onda francuska povukla iz projekta i napravila mozda i najbolji omni roll na svijetu, rafal. Tajfun nema niti priblizno mogucnosti koje ima rafal. Rafal je jedini avion na svijetu koji je radio bojna dijelovanja, bez podrske drugih aviona i bez awacs

  • @necatisahin6585
    @necatisahin6585 24 дня назад

    EF-2000 TYPHOON Türkiye best options.