The 8 GB VRAM might prove problematic for a lot of users, especially latop users. The 3060 laptop which is like the 4th or 5th most popular card according to Steam runs only 6 GB VRAM. These laptops pass all the other requirements but not this one. It's a bit disapointing, but it is what it is.
I have a 3060 RTX laptop using 6GB VRAM. I only just got it before i heard about Starfield. I'm really hoping it runs it smoothly with decent graphics. Here's hoping.
Mine is ready or at least it better be! My rig Case: Hyte Y60 Snow White Custom hardline watercooled 7900x3D and 7900XTX with 760mm worth of radiator with manual overclocks. I also have 64gb of DDR5 clocked to 5600mhz. I must’ve got lucky in the silicone lottery because a lot of people people can’t overclock past 4800 MHz. I just upgraded my boot drive to a Crucial T700 gen5 m.2. And yes, my motherboard has Gen 5. I have 8 fans 6-120mm and 2-140mm
I think either he can't afford it, has a PC below the minSpec or he only plays Playstation. AKA a classic case of jealousy and "I can't play it so I hope it will sucks"
The 8GB is not as big a deal as people think. Ultimately, if the frame buffer can fit in there and there are enough raster operators on the unit, it falls down to the devs to optimise the scene rendering so it doesn't eat up humorously lump amounts of vram. I've been playing on a gtx 1070 ever since I bought it a year after it came out and I have to admit, it work just fine on 1440p with some reasonable tweaks here and there. If I can pull 50-60 fps on this fossil in most games I play (anything one can imagine when it comes to single player games - Cyberpunk, Witcher 3, X4, Scorn, HZD, Satiffactory, Valheim, Dying Light 2/*this one seems to perform the worst out of the entire bunch, dropping into the middle 30s here and there with fsr on*/, etc), then people should be able to get relatively stable fps on better units. And I don't even bother dropping the details all that much. Also, a fair reminder - it's a Bethesda game. It will suck in it's first year after release.
My computer: 2 x 2 TB SSD ( total 4 TB ) Processor: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-11700F @ 2.50GHz, 2496 MHz, 8 core('s), 16 logische processor(s) Graphic Card: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 32 GB Memory Monitor Ultra Wide 49 inch curved monitor ( 5120 x 1440 / 5K ) I hope I can play the game on 5120 x 1440 Resolution.
Going in with a i7-9700/16gb/2x500gb Nvme's/GTX 1080. I have most the parts (all EK) for a custom loop for the GTX1080. I plan to complete the loop and bump up to 32gb or 64gb for ram. This game will slightly determine my jump back to RTX. I had both a RTX 3060 and RTX3070 FTW during the pandemic. I got busy with work and was able to sell them at a profit, so off they went. My local used market is full of affordable RTX cards, as the miners are still unloading, even this far out. Great video..sub'd.
Playing on PC at 1440P with a 3600X and a 2070 Super with 16GB 3600mhz. I'm somewhere in the middle in terms of specs; the 2080 is slightly faster than the 2070S. I don't mind playing at 30FPS (or even 40 which does feel a lot better than 30, especially with a 120hz monitor) provided the frame time consistency is good.
Will be going into Starfield with a RTX 2080 and i7-9700k. Confident it will be a smooth experience. Cyberpunk's Phantom Liberty/Update has me worried.
Screw the phantom liberty update. Cdpr so badly wants to make that game a tech demo rather than a functioning game. First ray tracing overdrive and now this.
@@content9443 I've noticed a couple of things about that I wasn't aware of before... Although, still one of my Favorites to Play... Haven't gotten to Fully experience it all tho.
I am a bit concerned about a couple of things as well as far as Playing it Fully.. I didn't notice some things with Cyberpunk at first... Hope I can Play it.
I've got 12400f (slightly better than stock 10700k) + 3060ti (g6x) (basically 2% worse than 3070, so equivalent to 2080ti) + 32 gb ddr4 (3733mhz, cl17) + sata ssd with dram. it's slightly above recomended, so, i guess, I shouldn't have problems running this game. I'm glad some companies still make well-optimized games oriented on mid-range hardware
Gonna run StarField on my 1070 (8 Gig VRam in it). Had a discussion with others on a gaming forum and they said that it will run, but slightly lower perf than 1070TI. As long as there are no shaders or special modes on the minimum spec cards that are "required", you should be able to run the game with that. I don't mind fiddling with some settings to get it to run decently rather than spend €300-800 on a new graphics card for just one game.
Yes but spending money on GPU for one game means bigger FPS for other older games, so it's not waste, but again you don't need RTX 4090 or RX 7900 XTX.
What settings are you going to fiddle with? You'll set the resolution to 1080p and all graphics settings to low. done. This is what you will do with all modern games on such an old system/gpu.
Currently after a recent upgrade I'm on an i7-9700k with a RTX 4080. Not really worried about the GPU side, but CPU requirements really shot up lately, I thought I could wait with the CPU Upgrade for some years...
The total power of your CPU is still equal to a 10600k, so you should be fine. But I'd imagine the game will be very CPU limited, so almost everyone will be around 35-70 FPS depending on if they have a Ryzen 2600x or 13900k. I think It'll be another Star Wars: Survivor scenario.
My current rig is a 12700k, 32GB DDR5, 3090ti and have remained on 1440p to lengthen the lifespan of the hardware going forward with newer games rather than do the 4k thing. At my age with my old eyes I would not see that much if any difference between 1440 and 4k anyway.
I'm with you in the gut felling that the game will be heavy on CPU. My bet is that to run it without any issue it will require a Zen3 Processeor like the Ryzen 5 5600 or above.
Very interesting analysis. Good job mate :). For me, I upgraded my PC at the end of the last year to Ryzen 9 5900x and MSI RX 6950xt with 16GB VRAM for my favorite universe game - Warhammer 40k Darktide. I decided for a mature RDNA 2 than going for the trailblazing RDNA 3 or melting 40xx series... I was always a fan of nVidia, but after the pricing of "4080" scam that was basically 4070 or maybe 4070 Ti... I switched. And am very happy with it. I think it should be enough for some time :D. I do look forward to 8000 or 9000 series in the future though :D.
@@davidnott_ I had i7-7600k and GTX 1080, so it was about 3x jump in power for me. Very happy with it. Can see that games like Humankind or Darktide run well. But even with this Darktide can’t max out some settings 😓. And thanks for the answer mate! Good luck with the channel. 👍
I am also going to go AMD next card. I have a 3060 now and would like to stay Nvidia, but screw their big money grab, Nvidia lost me for good after 30 years.
I'm currently in the process of building a gaming/photo/video editing system with a custom water loop. Replacing my intel i7-3770k, GTX1060, 32GB ram with a Ryzen 9 5950X, RTX3090, 128GB ram. Hopefully, the new system will give me 12 years of use also, or at least around 10 years.
I have an AMD Rizen 9 3900X, Geforce 2070 Super 8GB video card, 32 gigs of ram, 2x 2tb ssd's and 100 watt PS. Yet I am hearing conflicting reports on my GPU. I am still doing the research and will reach out to ya when I get more details. TY for the vid, learned a cpl new things from you, thx for that. Keep up the work you've earned my sub.....avb
Here's something weird, the game's product key comes with several models of the 6700xt and 6750xt, so it's possible to net the game for free with those cards!
Going into Starfield with a 4080 master 16gb, 13th gen i7, 32gb ddr5 that I just built! Should be able to handle all of the newer games without breaking a sweat.
So I finally reached the point where my PC is below the minimum system requirements of a game. Not anything I can do about it, no money, but such is life. Keep on fighting GTX 1660 Super and i7 5960X!
Intel i7-7700 with an nVidia 3060 RTX, 12GB. Some beastly games coming out - Starfield least of all, CDPR's Phantom Liberty and 1.7 patch boosted the recommended stats needed; not only for the DLC, but for the base game as well.
I'm willing to bet it will run fairly well on a 1660 Super or ti. Perhaps after some further optimisation. At least for those of us with no interest in ray tracing. And the 30 FPS target for 'consoles' probably applies to the Xbox S.
I am playing on the PC, running Ryzen 5600x, 16gb 3600mhz CL15, RX 6650 XT (Overclocked). Hoping for Medium / High settings. My setup is not good enough for Ray Tracing or Ultra settings.
I don't think my PC will even be able to run this, don't know though( AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with a Nvidia 3050Ti and 16gb RAM). I can't play it on my PS5 cause of the bethesda buyout and My PC probably is Not good enough even though it is much better than what I had a few months ago, and I'm currently not able (or willing) to drop $500 on a Series X for one game that no one knows if it will be great or just average and I would miss out on like 80% of mods in the future by not going PC. Bummer. Guess I'll have to act like it doesn't exist for 5 yrs or so. By then an average PC ought to be able to handle it fine with what ever patches, mods and DLC that will be added by then.
I doubt it. It will max the vram for no reason like all the other AMD sponsored games lately. Odd... It seems to me that AMD is trying to push you to buy their products only.
@@AtteroDominatusI wouldn’t say it’s for no reason. It’s just that Nvidia doesn’t put enough Vram on the cards until you get to the higher end. People have been complaining for a long time.
@@Nic-te3vq tlou is my case in point. Why exactly was it able to run on a ps4 with 8gb of shared system ram but not on an 8gb card with its own dedicated vram? I get they upgraded the graphics, but did they optimize the game? Seems to me that AMD sponsored games are maxing the vram to push nvidia out of the market. Also, 24gb isn't enough for the high end? I know 10gb is kinda low for 4k, but how many of you are actually playing in 4k? I have a 3080ti, and I haven't run into any issues playing at 4k unless it's a new AMD sponsored game... surprise surprise..
@@AtteroDominatus 24gb is fine but the issue comes in the lower tier cards and the fact that they’re still offering 8gb cards instead of just starting it off on 12 that’s why when you see direct comparisons of the 12gb 3060 and the 8gb 4060 the performance is relatively similar and in higher resolutions the 3060 outperforms the 4060 which is absurd. Most of the AMD cards are starting with 16gb in the midrange for much cheaper than the 4070. It doesn’t cost nvidia very much money to add Vram it’s like over 6gb for 30ish dollars or something it’s cheap to add it. Nvidia does it to push people to get the higher tier cards. Also the PS4 and Ps5 can get away with that just because of optimization. They have settings tweaked and neat little work arounds like checkerboarding instead of using native 4k on the ps4. If they were both compared apples to apples settings wise we’d see the ps4 and the ps5 run out of vram as well
AMD Ryzen 10 - 3970 threadripper Rogue Zenith 2 extreme alpha (MB) RTX 3090Ti Just got a 65" Samsung 120hz gaming TV for new monitor Ordering the Starfield headset and controller soon I've been preparing for many months for this game.
I just sold my consoles to build a pc. Rtx 4080/78003xd/32 GB ram. I didn't build it for starfield but i did get starfield with the purchase of my CPU which was nice. Im excited to see how it will run. I have been playing elden ring on my new machine and its been pretty amazing so far. 4k 60 max settings. I dont see starfield being much of a problem. I guess it depends on how well its optimized. Hopefully its not a mess.
My system i9-9900K, 32GB DDR4, RTX 3060, WD Black SN750 NVMe M.2 2280 1TB SSD , ASUS TUF Gaming 27" 165Hz @ 1080p IPS, this was my first build about 3 yrs. ago. I am so looking forward to playing this game.
Thanks for the video! I myself changed my RX590 to a RX 6650 XT and added a second M.2 SSD, leaving the rest of the system alone. Still a Ryzen 7 3800X with 32GB DDR4 3200. Guess that will do the trick.
I'm below minimum. Amd 2600 and Radeon RX580. Built it 4 years ago. Depending on how bad it runs, I'll upgrade to amd 5500 and Radeon Rx 6660 or build new computer that can do 1440p
I honestly was thinking of building a new rig to play this ( huuuge fan of skyrim so can't wait for Starfield ). Ended up staying with my current rig - if it is too fail - then build a new one. Current rig: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 gb 3200 CL 16 Ram - RTX 2070 8 GB - SSD only ( 2x 2TB and one m.2 for the system ). This is on a B450 MOBO and I am thinking of switching this out with an upgraded one ( prbably the Taichi X570 AM4 Razer ) and also a new GPU . In regards to GPU I am really stuck in the mud - 4000 series seem to blow up and I don't know how good the AMD GPU is - I'd be in the middle field as I cannot afford top of the line stuff. Asrock Phantom Gaming RX 6800 XT 16 GB looks like a good GPU and I can afford that one...
6800XT is a great card at a great price right now, so long as you don’t need any of nvidias other “features” - nvenc, nvidia broadcast etc, could be a good call
Considering the game is capped at 60fps that will be more than enough for ultra assuming the video memory isn't exceeded at that setting. I have a 5800X with a 2070 Super and I'll be shocked if it struggles, especially if the game has DLSS.
If the game is optimized then yes that should easily get you 60fps, but seeing as how almost every single pc port this year has had some of the absolute worst optimization ive ever seen in my life id not take any chances and wait for benchmarks before purchasing the game.
64gb DDR4 3600, Ryzen 9 5900X, PowerColor 7900xtx Red Devil. Glad I bought the XTX because Star wars Survivor was at times using 20gb and was still running smooth.
I Built a new pc 2 months ago . Coming from 17 7700k and 2070s Upgraded to i7 13700kf , rtx 4070ti and 32gb of ram . Cant wait to play starfield and cyberpunks 2077 new dlc
I'm really looking forward to this game. I'll be running it on an Alienware Area 51 R1 with a i7-9700 CPU (8 core - 8 Thread) and a RTX 2070. Hopefully that will do the job. Great video!
I've legit had to build a new PC. Currently in the process of getting an I9-13900k and RTX 4090. In addition to 64GB of DDR5 RAM at 6000mhz, because fuck it. Why not. Going to be throwing Starfield on a 1TB NVME SSD. I should probably say that I'm not just building a new PC for Starfield. I've been on an I7-4790k and GTX 1080Ti for awhile now. Since like 2015. So I've needed to upgrade for awhile and upgrading at this point basically requires me to build a whole new PC. So I figured, I may as well go all the way for future proofing. Just happens that Starfield is coming out right before I build my new PC. So I'm definitely excited.
I was thinking about running Starfield, but I'm legally blind, and can't see any of the user interface fonts, which are too small. Even on a 50" monitor that's just 3 feet away, I can't see that tiny text. LOL Also, don't have a big enough SSD. I'm currently running an Nvidia GTX 3070, and 16 gigs, on AMD Ryzen 7 series CPU. Thanks for sharing this.
PC for sure. Ryzen 5800X3D and a XFX 6900 XT. 32GB of 3600 RAM to round it out. I will mostly play it on my 120Hz Samsung Q80 QLED TV at 4k. If that isn't enough...time to build a new computer!
I'm glad to hear someone else use brouhaha aptly. Great information from the video. I've got a Ryzen 5 5600X, 6700 XT and all SSDs. Should be good enough for 1440p. Hopefully.
Got the acer chromebook 516 ge and will just be playing via cloud streaming and hooked into my TV through its hdmi port. Snagged on Amazon for 400 bucks. 🎉
I’ll be playing this on my new PC with: i9 16-Core Processor i9-12900KS 32GB Corsair VENGEANCE DDR5 5200MHz (2 x 16GB) 24GB NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 4090 However, as it’s being released on Game Pass, I’ll play it on my XsX to begin with, before deciding whether to purchase the game separately on PC.
I just built a new PC. I didn't build it for Starfield, my PC was 5 years old (geforce 1070 Ti, intel i7 8700K, 8G RAM). Built out a Intel i7 13700K, Geforce 4070 RTX Ti, and 32G RAM. Really looking forward to Starfield and then Baldur's Gate 3 the probably The Outer Wilds
Planing to play on PC. Got a Ryzen 5 7600X coupled with a Radeon RX 6950XT. 32 GB of DDR 5, 6400 CL 32 RAM running at 6200 limited by either the processor or board.. a TUF Gaming B650 Pro motherboard. Oh and two M.2 NVME SSD's one 500GB for system and the other a 2TB for games.
I'll be playing it on PC with a AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX an a Nvidia RTX 3070 (8gig ram). I've been worried lately with all the talk about 8 gig cards that my computer wouldn't be up to speed but after what you mentioned I think I'll be ok. It is a 16 gig set up as well so I just want it to get me through the next generation of gaming. 😅
Am going to play on a 100mhz 1440 UW, with a 5800X3D and an rx6800. Will be hoping to get a stable 60, but we'll see what happens, and what settings I have to tweak to make that happen.
waiting for this game, been a PC gamer most all my life but had to use console for lat 2 years until a month ago. new build with i7 13700k and 7900xtx nitro+, really hope I can run this 4k 120fps without sacrificing to much details.
I'm confident that a PC with 64GB, a 5900x and 7900xtx is gonna be fine...would OC if needed for good performance at 4k but I'll wait to see how it goes.
Just so you know the 64G or RAM doesn't actually matter. 16G is considered the sweet spot for RAM for gaming anything over that doesn't offer much in the way of performance gain. The only reason you'd need that much ram is if you're doing video or photo editing and have multiple windows open doing all sorts of different things the RAM allows you to switch between those functions, that's what your GPU is. Tge GPU stores functions while gaming while is why a GPU has so much memory built into it. Now if you said you had 16G of DDR5 as opposed to 64G of DDr4 that would make a difference because while it's not more memory it's faster memory which would actually make a difference
3070ti and i7 11700k. I imagine the 30 FPS cap will be directed at 1440p or even 4k. I personally play all my games at 1080p still because I find higher resolution with DLSS honestly looks worse then a native render of a lower resolution. I may be wrong but I'm fairly sure as a 1080p gamer I'll be playing this in buttery smooth 144.
I have a 1660ti, really hoping to be able to run it! I don't mind locking the game at 30 & adjusting settings accordingly - the two things I REALLY hate trading for performance is good lighting and fairly high textures. ;_;
I've got an intel i7 12700KF, 32GB DDR5 and an RTX 3070Ti I have 2 1440P monitors, an ultra wide oled 165Hz and a 27" 240Hz So I'm hoping to get a steady 60fps on the ultra wide at 1440P. If I can get closer to 120fps that would be awesome, but I'm not expecting that. I think a steady 60fps will look great. Good video btw. Very to the point and clear.
Gonna try Starfield with Win 11 Pro, a i7-9700KF CPU an RTX 3060 with 12gb of VRAM and 32 gb of system RAM. Hope my rig can run it decently in 1440. Fingers crossed lol.
A problem I have with my gaming laptop is that, while it will run any game I've tried thus far, some of them made the vents so hot I couldn't touch them (bought a fan stand for it to sit on that cured that). However, the power supply, and it is a large one, gets so hot that it is worrisome. My primary tower doesn't have those problems (huge cooling capabilities), per se, but my wife and I have noted that certain games will make the family room much warmer, especially on the side where my comps are.
I'm currently running a GTX 1660 6GB Vram 16GB of Ram, have a Ryzen 5 5600 CPU, not sure if us 1660s users are gonna have to fork up 300-500 bucks just to be able to run this game at 60 fps on even minimum settings
I'm similar to you just bought a gaming laptop and upgrading ram to 32gb DDR4 3200 RAM from 16 and have a RTX3070 MAXP @125W mobile with a Ryzen 9 5900HX weakest link obviously being the GPU fingers crossed this should handle at high setting at least on 1660p
I truly hope this will be at least somewhat properly optimized at release. Going to need 4k steady 60fps, and if my main rig with a 5800x, 32Gb of ram, a fast NVMe SSD and a 3080 Ti can't offer that, I'm going to be mad. I can easily live without RT, so here's to hope for steady frames with this setup in 4k.
I do not need the raytracing so will stick with my current setup, Dell 3220 DGF Nvidia Gsynch 164HZ at 2560x1440, Nvdia 2070 Super (matches RTX 2080 non super), Intel i7 10900k and 16 Gigs of RAM.
Really looking forward to this game, even if it's only half of what we've seen it will be outstanding. As for my build, going to be running it on a 5600X and a 6750XT with 32gb ddr4 3200mhz. So GPU is a step down from the recommend, a decent 1440p experience is all I'm after
Just finished building a 64gb ryzen 9 3900x with a 16gb rtx 4080 and 2 tb .m2 I expect to be able to max it all out but we shall see, as I am getting Starfield mainly to test the set up :D
Hardware wise i'm pretty sure i'm alright: Ryzen 7 5800x3D, 32gb cl16, rx6700XT and 2tb WDblack gen 4 nvme, hoping they manage to use L3 cache so i can take good advantage of my cpu. Targetting 1440p 60fps, anything below hopefully FSR will make up for. Also not gonna use Ray Tracing as generally the implementation is pretty similar to non RT.
Newly accquired 6950XT should get the job done. Specifically bought it not just for Starfield but mainly because I wanted a good upgrade from my 3060Ti with more vram in mind. The price point was just too good👍
i9-12900K RTX 3070 Ti 32 GB of Kingston Fury RAM Not sure if this is what you wanted??? And this is only if I can not build a new machine before launch
I will be playing on my pc . I have a i9 9900k, 64 GB Ram , MSI Gaming Trio X 4090 and i have already my m2 waiting for it with 1 TB but thinking about buying another m2 with 4TB .
I currently have a 1660 super TI which I'll be using when it gets released, so far this card runs everything I throw at it. I'll be budgeting to spend out on a 3070ti if it doesn't run well
Just finishing my rig...Hoping It will be good for a while...All AMD 32 Gig XPG Neo...Ryzen 7 5700g...7900xt...1.5 T WD Black ssd...I was nervous about it running Ray tracing ...And still am not quite sold that it will do the job at 100 fps or more.
I’m still convinced by Ray tracing in a lot of titles. It looks different, but I’m not convinced it looks better all of the time, at least not such that I’ll notice while actually playing vs pixel peeping
@davidnott_ yeah...but it's still in its early stages once fully developed it will probably have a lot more effect hope with a little less hit to performance...as of now it's not that noticeable to me either...AR least not t o justify the performance hit hit
I don't know a ton about computers, but for my 40th birthday my brother got me a computer with i7 12700k and a 4090. I am hoping that will run Starfield on ultra at 4k.
Still running an i7 6700k released in 2015 with a 2080ti and I still don't have probs running games today. DCS & MSFS, 2 of the most FPS taxing games on the market both run just fine with 30-60 FPS and that's on a 2K monitor as well. The i5 10600k is only 10% faster at best overall. Not worth the upgrade. I'll stick with what I'm still using and Starfield will run just fine. My hardrive space, lol, now that's a different story. I have 6 different SSD's and they're all pretty much full.
Still on an i5-8400 with a 1070ti, been using it for 6 years now and simply saw no need to upgrade for the type of games I play (mostly mmo and rpg). Assuming Starfield isn’t yet another Todd Special I plan to upgrade to either a 7600 or a 13400 with a 7700 or a 4070, all depending on performance and cost at that moment. My 8400 and 1070ti have served me well, they're due for a bit of rest.
Same, I gave up on my 1070 ti and i5-8600k after hearing about starfield requierements. They were really a blast back then but they start to struggle. Now with a 4070, i5-13600k, 32 gb ddr 5 and a m2 nvme pci 4.0 SSD im hoping to get good performance with Starfield on 1440p :).
Still running my HP Omen that I bought for right at 1000 back in late 2018..These recommended specs are finally peaking it. i7-8700/32gb/2080. We'll see how it does lol. My mobile is a Legion 7 i7-10750/32/2070Super. Will be interesting to see how they run it. Being Bethesda, it'll be 6 months before it's worth playing i'd bet.
I have gtx 1650, i5-11400h and 32gb ram laptop (I did the ram upgrade myself) but in the past I ran rdr2 on 8gb ram at 40 fps max settings plus my gpu wasnt matching req at all, and ive had luck running games that req alot better gpus so i guess only time will tell when it comes to starfield, i pre orderd it a while ago but im pretty nervous, i rlly hope it works even if its only 30 fps or 20.
ryzen 5 5600 and hopefully a RX 6750 XT 16GB RAM (may be able to upgrade to 32GB) installed on my OS NVME drive. I have 2x1TB SATA SSD for older games and and total of 20TB HDD for large video storage
Will be going into Starfield with a 10980XE, 3090strix OC edition, 256gig Ram, triple rad EK liquid cooled (gpu and cpu) on Samsung Neo Oddessey G9. Hoping FOV and Frames should come up pretty good 🤔🫤
The 8 GB VRAM might prove problematic for a lot of users, especially latop users. The 3060 laptop which is like the 4th or 5th most popular card according to Steam runs only 6 GB VRAM. These laptops pass all the other requirements but not this one. It's a bit disapointing, but it is what it is.
if it's just the VRAM that's the issue, I guess most folks will opt to lower texture quality, volumetric density, etc.
I have a 3060 RTX laptop using 6GB VRAM. I only just got it before i heard about Starfield. I'm really hoping it runs it smoothly with decent graphics. Here's hoping.
The series s has 4gb of vram its gonna run starfield at 30 fps 1440p so 6gb at 1080p should get you 60fps high settings idk tho
@@frankmundo4300where the hell are you getting that from lol it's 10GB shared memory with a maximum of 8 to the GPU.
@@oliverjurd he is Ngreedia fanboy.
Mine is ready or at least it better be!
My rig
Case: Hyte Y60 Snow White
Custom hardline watercooled 7900x3D and 7900XTX with 760mm worth of radiator with manual overclocks.
I also have 64gb of DDR5 clocked to 5600mhz. I must’ve got lucky in the silicone lottery because a lot of people people can’t overclock past 4800 MHz.
I just upgraded my boot drive to a Crucial T700 gen5 m.2. And yes, my motherboard has Gen 5.
I have 8 fans 6-120mm and 2-140mm
doesnt matter. it will lagg, stutter and crash regardless. CREATION ENGINE!!!
Judging a game like that before it comes out
I think either he can't afford it, has a PC below the minSpec or he only plays Playstation. AKA a classic case of jealousy and "I can't play it so I hope it will sucks"
The 8GB is not as big a deal as people think. Ultimately, if the frame buffer can fit in there and there are enough raster operators on the unit, it falls down to the devs to optimise the scene rendering so it doesn't eat up humorously lump amounts of vram. I've been playing on a gtx 1070 ever since I bought it a year after it came out and I have to admit, it work just fine on 1440p with some reasonable tweaks here and there. If I can pull 50-60 fps on this fossil in most games I play (anything one can imagine when it comes to single player games - Cyberpunk, Witcher 3, X4, Scorn, HZD, Satiffactory, Valheim, Dying Light 2/*this one seems to perform the worst out of the entire bunch, dropping into the middle 30s here and there with fsr on*/, etc), then people should be able to get relatively stable fps on better units. And I don't even bother dropping the details all that much.
Also, a fair reminder - it's a Bethesda game. It will suck in it's first year after release.
My computer:
2 x 2 TB SSD ( total 4 TB )
Processor: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-11700F @ 2.50GHz, 2496 MHz, 8 core('s), 16 logische processor(s)
Graphic Card: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
32 GB Memory
Monitor Ultra Wide 49 inch curved monitor ( 5120 x 1440 / 5K )
I hope I can play the game on 5120 x 1440 Resolution.
Going in with a i7-9700/16gb/2x500gb Nvme's/GTX 1080. I have most the parts (all EK) for a custom loop for the GTX1080. I plan to complete the loop and bump up to 32gb or 64gb for ram. This game will slightly determine my jump back to RTX. I had both a RTX 3060 and RTX3070 FTW during the pandemic. I got busy with work and was able to sell them at a profit, so off they went. My local used market is full of affordable RTX cards, as the miners are still unloading, even this far out. Great video..sub'd.
Playing on PC at 1440P with a 3600X and a 2070 Super with 16GB 3600mhz. I'm somewhere in the middle in terms of specs; the 2080 is slightly faster than the 2070S. I don't mind playing at 30FPS (or even 40 which does feel a lot better than 30, especially with a 120hz monitor) provided the frame time consistency is good.
Yeah I agree. I do a lot of flight simming on my other channel and I’ll take a stable 30 over an up and down 40-60 any day
Will be going into Starfield with a RTX 2080 and i7-9700k. Confident it will be a smooth experience. Cyberpunk's Phantom Liberty/Update has me worried.
Fingers crossed you'll be fine :) ...and yes, Cyberpunk should be...interesting!!
Screw the phantom liberty update. Cdpr so badly wants to make that game a tech demo rather than a functioning game. First ray tracing overdrive and now this.
@@content9443you don't have to turn on this features
@@content9443 I've noticed a couple of things about that I wasn't aware of before... Although, still one of my Favorites to Play... Haven't gotten to Fully experience it all tho.
I am a bit concerned about a couple of things as well as far as Playing it Fully.. I didn't notice some things with Cyberpunk at first... Hope I can Play it.
I've got 12400f (slightly better than stock 10700k) + 3060ti (g6x) (basically 2% worse than 3070, so equivalent to 2080ti) + 32 gb ddr4 (3733mhz, cl17) + sata ssd with dram. it's slightly above recomended, so, i guess, I shouldn't have problems running this game. I'm glad some companies still make well-optimized games oriented on mid-range hardware
we have the exact same specs lol. i normally don't even care to much about AAA games but this one interests me
Gonna run StarField on my 1070 (8 Gig VRam in it). Had a discussion with others on a gaming forum and they said that it will run, but slightly lower perf than 1070TI. As long as there are no shaders or special modes on the minimum spec cards that are "required", you should be able to run the game with that. I don't mind fiddling with some settings to get it to run decently rather than spend €300-800 on a new graphics card for just one game.
Yes but spending money on GPU for one game means bigger FPS for other older games, so it's not waste, but again you don't need RTX 4090 or RX 7900 XTX.
What settings are you going to fiddle with? You'll set the resolution to 1080p and all graphics settings to low. done. This is what you will do with all modern games on such an old system/gpu.
Currently after a recent upgrade I'm on an i7-9700k with a RTX 4080. Not really worried about the GPU side, but CPU requirements really shot up lately, I thought I could wait with the CPU Upgrade for some years...
The total power of your CPU is still equal to a 10600k, so you should be fine. But I'd imagine the game will be very CPU limited, so almost everyone will be around 35-70 FPS depending on if they have a Ryzen 2600x or 13900k. I think It'll be another Star Wars: Survivor scenario.
Isn’t your cpu bottlenecking your gpu?
My current rig is a 12700k, 32GB DDR5, 3090ti and have remained on 1440p to lengthen the lifespan of the hardware going forward with newer games rather than do the 4k thing.
At my age with my old eyes I would not see that much if any difference between 1440 and 4k anyway.
That makes total sense. I just admit, running 1440p on my 4K TV, I struggle to tell if I’m sat back far enough!
Hi David, I've just found your channel and I love your style, format, content and oh yes, your soothing voice. Subbed. :)
these comments are scary . why is no one using 32gb of ram minimum? you have 800$ for a GPU but not 80 for 32gb of ram???
I'm with you in the gut felling that the game will be heavy on CPU.
My bet is that to run it without any issue it will require a Zen3 Processeor like the Ryzen 5 5600 or above.
Bs the 3600 will handle it fine
Very interesting analysis. Good job mate :). For me, I upgraded my PC at the end of the last year to Ryzen 9 5900x and MSI RX 6950xt with 16GB VRAM for my favorite universe game - Warhammer 40k Darktide. I decided for a mature RDNA 2 than going for the trailblazing RDNA 3 or melting 40xx series... I was always a fan of nVidia, but after the pricing of "4080" scam that was basically 4070 or maybe 4070 Ti... I switched. And am very happy with it.
I think it should be enough for some time :D. I do look forward to 8000 or 9000 series in the future though :D.
Nothing wrong with RDNA2! I think this current gen is a pass from me. Fingers crossed 50 series / RDNA 4 does a bit more
@@davidnott_ I had i7-7600k and GTX 1080, so it was about 3x jump in power for me. Very happy with it. Can see that games like Humankind or Darktide run well. But even with this Darktide can’t max out some settings 😓.
And thanks for the answer mate! Good luck with the channel. 👍
@@tymoteuszbryx249 appreciate it, thanks!
I am also going to go AMD next card. I have a 3060 now and would like to stay Nvidia, but screw their big money grab, Nvidia lost me for good after 30 years.
I should add that my previous setup was i5-7600k and GTX 1080.
I'm currently in the process of building a gaming/photo/video editing system with a custom water loop. Replacing my intel i7-3770k, GTX1060, 32GB ram with a Ryzen 9 5950X, RTX3090, 128GB ram. Hopefully, the new system will give me 12 years of use also, or at least around 10 years.
I have an AMD Rizen 9 3900X, Geforce 2070 Super 8GB video card, 32 gigs of ram, 2x 2tb ssd's and 100 watt PS. Yet I am hearing conflicting reports on my GPU. I am still doing the research and will reach out to ya when I get more details. TY for the vid, learned a cpl new things from you, thx for that. Keep up the work you've earned my sub.....avb
Here's something weird, the game's product key comes with several models of the 6700xt and 6750xt, so it's possible to net the game for free with those cards!
Going into Starfield with a 4080 master 16gb, 13th gen i7, 32gb ddr5 that I just built! Should be able to handle all of the newer games without breaking a sweat.
VIRGIN?
So I finally reached the point where my PC is below the minimum system requirements of a game. Not anything I can do about it, no money, but such is life. Keep on fighting GTX 1660 Super and i7 5960X!
Intel i7-7700 with an nVidia 3060 RTX, 12GB. Some beastly games coming out - Starfield least of all, CDPR's Phantom Liberty and 1.7 patch boosted the recommended stats needed; not only for the DLC, but for the base game as well.
Yes indeed, currently editing a video about that 😂
I'm willing to bet it will run fairly well on a 1660 Super or ti. Perhaps after some further optimisation. At least for those of us with no interest in ray tracing. And the 30 FPS target for 'consoles' probably applies to the Xbox S.
Nope, developers themselves stated that starfield will be locked at 30fps on series S/X
I beleive that the series S will be at 1440p and the X will be at 4k@@kenvanpassen9247
I am playing on the PC, running Ryzen 5600x, 16gb 3600mhz CL15, RX 6650 XT (Overclocked).
Hoping for Medium / High settings.
My setup is not good enough for Ray Tracing or Ultra settings.
I don't think my PC will even be able to run this, don't know though( AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with a Nvidia 3050Ti and 16gb RAM). I can't play it on my PS5 cause of the bethesda buyout and My PC probably is Not good enough even though it is much better than what I had a few months ago, and I'm currently not able (or willing) to drop $500 on a Series X for one game that no one knows if it will be great or just average and I would miss out on like 80% of mods in the future by not going PC. Bummer. Guess I'll have to act like it doesn't exist for 5 yrs or so. By then an average PC ought to be able to handle it fine with what ever patches, mods and DLC that will be added by then.
Can't wait to play this on Playstation 3 and the Switch Lite
🤝
I had the same CPU and GPU as you have but I upgraded from the 5600X to 5800X3D and 3070 to 3080Ti.
More than enough to easily run Starfield.
I sure hope so and it not the Ryzen 8000s are right around the corner
I doubt it. It will max the vram for no reason like all the other AMD sponsored games lately. Odd... It seems to me that AMD is trying to push you to buy their products only.
@@AtteroDominatusI wouldn’t say it’s for no reason. It’s just that Nvidia doesn’t put enough Vram on the cards until you get to the higher end. People have been complaining for a long time.
@@Nic-te3vq tlou is my case in point. Why exactly was it able to run on a ps4 with 8gb of shared system ram but not on an 8gb card with its own dedicated vram? I get they upgraded the graphics, but did they optimize the game? Seems to me that AMD sponsored games are maxing the vram to push nvidia out of the market. Also, 24gb isn't enough for the high end? I know 10gb is kinda low for 4k, but how many of you are actually playing in 4k? I have a 3080ti, and I haven't run into any issues playing at 4k unless it's a new AMD sponsored game... surprise surprise..
@@AtteroDominatus 24gb is fine but the issue comes in the lower tier cards and the fact that they’re still offering 8gb cards instead of just starting it off on 12 that’s why when you see direct comparisons of the 12gb 3060 and the 8gb 4060 the performance is relatively similar and in higher resolutions the 3060 outperforms the 4060 which is absurd. Most of the AMD cards are starting with 16gb in the midrange for much cheaper than the 4070. It doesn’t cost nvidia very much money to add Vram it’s like over 6gb for 30ish dollars or something it’s cheap to add it. Nvidia does it to push people to get the higher tier cards. Also the PS4 and Ps5 can get away with that just because of optimization. They have settings tweaked and neat little work arounds like checkerboarding instead of using native 4k on the ps4. If they were both compared apples to apples settings wise we’d see the ps4 and the ps5 run out of vram as well
I'll pick the game up in a year or so when it's been fixed.
My Steam backlog is quite hefty, so in no rush.
AMD Ryzen 10 - 3970 threadripper
Rogue Zenith 2 extreme alpha (MB)
RTX 3090Ti
Just got a 65" Samsung 120hz gaming TV for new monitor
Ordering the Starfield headset and controller soon
I've been preparing for many months for this game.
I just sold my consoles to build a pc. Rtx 4080/78003xd/32 GB ram. I didn't build it for starfield but i did get starfield with the purchase of my CPU which was nice. Im excited to see how it will run. I have been playing elden ring on my new machine and its been pretty amazing so far. 4k 60 max settings. I dont see starfield being much of a problem. I guess it depends on how well its optimized. Hopefully its not a mess.
My system i9-9900K, 32GB DDR4, RTX 3060, WD Black SN750 NVMe M.2 2280 1TB SSD , ASUS TUF Gaming 27" 165Hz @ 1080p IPS, this was my first build about 3 yrs. ago. I am so looking forward to playing this game.
With an i5-10400F and 6700xt im confident it's gonna be a smooth 1080p experience, even after release they will do some updates for optimization
Running a Ryzen 5 5600x, 32 GB of ram, and I recently upgraded to the RTX 4070. Excited to play this game with it!
Thanks for the video! I myself changed my RX590 to a RX 6650 XT and added a second M.2 SSD, leaving the rest of the system alone. Still a Ryzen 7 3800X with 32GB DDR4 3200. Guess that will do the trick.
NO YOU GONNA NEED A 2000 DOLLAR CARD TO PLAY THIS GAME
My pc cannot run this game:( all the pieces are still disassembled at the store in the packaging and I have not purchased any of them yet.
I will be! I run a Ryzen 7 3700x with a 3060Ti and 12gb of 3200mhz ram! My aim is 1440p on high, so fingers crossed!
I'm below minimum. Amd 2600 and Radeon RX580. Built it 4 years ago. Depending on how bad it runs, I'll upgrade to amd 5500 and Radeon Rx 6660 or build new computer that can do 1440p
A new Channel, im investing my sub bro!
I honestly was thinking of building a new rig to play this ( huuuge fan of skyrim so can't wait for Starfield ). Ended up staying with my current rig - if it is too fail - then build a new one.
Current rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 gb 3200 CL 16 Ram - RTX 2070 8 GB - SSD only ( 2x 2TB and one m.2 for the system ). This is on a B450 MOBO and I am thinking of switching this out with an upgraded one ( prbably the Taichi X570 AM4 Razer ) and also a new GPU .
In regards to GPU I am really stuck in the mud - 4000 series seem to blow up and I don't know how good the AMD GPU is - I'd be in the middle field as I cannot afford top of the line stuff.
Asrock Phantom Gaming RX 6800 XT 16 GB looks like a good GPU and I can afford that one...
6800XT is a great card at a great price right now, so long as you don’t need any of nvidias other “features” - nvenc, nvidia broadcast etc, could be a good call
Going to run it w/ AMD 5600x, 32 gig cl16 mem and 8gig 3060ti. Considering some upgrades soon but I think this will be ok for Starfield.
Considering the game is capped at 60fps that will be more than enough for ultra assuming the video memory isn't exceeded at that setting. I have a 5800X with a 2070 Super and I'll be shocked if it struggles, especially if the game has DLSS.
Got almost an identical build myself, I have a 3070 instead, which is very close a 3060ti. Fingers crossed for us both!
If the game is optimized then yes that should easily get you 60fps, but seeing as how almost every single pc port this year has had some of the absolute worst optimization ive ever seen in my life id not take any chances and wait for benchmarks before purchasing the game.
@@valkir293 Problem is it may NOT have DLSS.
I just built a core i9-12900k with an AMD RX 6800XT 16gb vram and 32GB DDR4 4000mhz CL18 RAM, im ready for starfield, hope it comes soon!
64gb DDR4 3600, Ryzen 9 5900X, PowerColor 7900xtx Red Devil. Glad I bought the XTX because Star wars Survivor was at times using 20gb and was still running smooth.
I Built a new pc 2 months ago . Coming from 17 7700k and 2070s Upgraded to i7 13700kf , rtx 4070ti and 32gb of ram . Cant wait to play starfield and cyberpunks 2077 new dlc
I'm really looking forward to this game. I'll be running it on an Alienware Area 51 R1 with a i7-9700 CPU (8 core - 8 Thread) and a RTX 2070. Hopefully that will do the job. Great video!
Same specs here but with a 2070S we'll be good bro! I do need another stick of ram though. I only have 16gb..
@@DDubzzz same! 16gb. I hope it's good enough. This game is gonna be epic!! I can't wait, man.
I'm thinking the lighting engine requires DXR at a minimum, meaning those older cards mentioned will not be able to run it at all.
Yes PC: Ryzen 5 3600, corsair vengeance ram 32gb at 3200mhz, RX 570 8BG. ABout to upgrade to RX 6750XT. I will also be playing on Fedora Linux.
I've legit had to build a new PC. Currently in the process of getting an I9-13900k and RTX 4090. In addition to 64GB of DDR5 RAM at 6000mhz, because fuck it. Why not. Going to be throwing Starfield on a 1TB NVME SSD. I should probably say that I'm not just building a new PC for Starfield. I've been on an I7-4790k and GTX 1080Ti for awhile now. Since like 2015. So I've needed to upgrade for awhile and upgrading at this point basically requires me to build a whole new PC. So I figured, I may as well go all the way for future proofing. Just happens that Starfield is coming out right before I build my new PC. So I'm definitely excited.
Sounds like you’re overdue! Enjoy the incredible upcoming build, spare a thought for my lowly 3070 😉
I was thinking about running Starfield, but I'm legally blind, and can't see any of the user interface fonts, which are too small. Even on a 50" monitor that's just 3 feet away, I can't see that tiny text. LOL Also, don't have a big enough SSD. I'm currently running an Nvidia GTX 3070, and 16 gigs, on AMD Ryzen 7 series CPU. Thanks for sharing this.
PC for sure. Ryzen 5800X3D and a XFX 6900 XT. 32GB of 3600 RAM to round it out. I will mostly play it on my 120Hz Samsung Q80 QLED TV at 4k. If that isn't enough...time to build a new computer!
Nice system! I keep getting tempted by an X3D
I'm glad to hear someone else use brouhaha aptly.
Great information from the video.
I've got a Ryzen 5 5600X, 6700 XT and all SSDs. Should be good enough for 1440p. Hopefully.
Haha! Thanks 😊
I have a 5 year old PC that i built, i7-8700K, 34GB DDR4, GTX 1080 Ti with 2TB NVMe SSD. Just above min spec so it might be playable, fingers crossed.
Got the acer chromebook 516 ge and will just be playing via cloud streaming and hooked into my TV through its hdmi port. Snagged on Amazon for 400 bucks. 🎉
I’ll be playing this on my new PC with:
i9 16-Core Processor i9-12900KS
32GB Corsair VENGEANCE DDR5 5200MHz (2 x 16GB)
24GB NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 4090
However, as it’s being released on Game Pass, I’ll play it on my XsX to begin with, before deciding whether to purchase the game separately on PC.
I just built a new PC. I didn't build it for Starfield, my PC was 5 years old (geforce 1070 Ti, intel i7 8700K, 8G RAM). Built out a Intel i7 13700K, Geforce 4070 RTX Ti, and 32G RAM. Really looking forward to Starfield and then Baldur's Gate 3 the probably The Outer Wilds
Sure am planning on it!
11600k, KO 3060ti, 16g gskill ram. NVME SSD.
I'll be running mine on AMD R9 3900X + 32 GB DDR4-3600 and RTX 3080Ti graphics card with an 8x 2TB SSD (Corsair MX500) RAID-5 array.
Just upgraded my Ryzen 5 3600 to a Ryzen 7 7800x3d for Starfield. (1440p, 3080 GPU) can’t wait
I'm going to be running this on my Steam Deck and PC. I did a 2TB NVMe swap on my Steam Deck.
Planing to play on PC. Got a Ryzen 5 7600X coupled with a Radeon RX 6950XT. 32 GB of DDR 5, 6400 CL 32 RAM running at 6200 limited by either the processor or board.. a TUF Gaming B650 Pro motherboard. Oh and two M.2 NVME SSD's one 500GB for system and the other a 2TB for games.
Can't wait for this game. I'll be running it on a AMD Ryzen 9 5900, 32GB 3466MHz RAM. RTX 3080 10GB GDDR6X
Great video. I'm excited to play this game. I hope you get more subscribers soon.
Thanks, me too - on both counts 🙂
Going to play starfield on my pc
Ryzen 5600, rtx 3060 12gb, nvme drive, 32gb 3600 ddr4.
Really looking forward to it 🤓
Im running a 1070ti with a i7-9700k hopefully starfield will still be playable might need to finally upgrade
I'll be playing it on PC with a AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX an a Nvidia RTX 3070 (8gig ram). I've been worried lately with all the talk about 8 gig cards that my computer wouldn't be up to speed but after what you mentioned I think I'll be ok. It is a 16 gig set up as well so I just want it to get me through the next generation of gaming. 😅
Am going to play on a 100mhz 1440 UW, with a 5800X3D and an rx6800. Will be hoping to get a stable 60, but we'll see what happens, and what settings I have to tweak to make that happen.
You’ll comfortably be above 60fps with your specs 😄. I have same CPU and 6800 XT.
waiting for this game, been a PC gamer most all my life but had to use console for lat 2 years until a month ago. new build with i7 13700k and 7900xtx nitro+, really hope I can run this 4k 120fps without sacrificing to much details.
I'm confident that a PC with 64GB, a 5900x and 7900xtx is gonna be fine...would OC if needed for good performance at 4k but I'll wait to see how it goes.
Just so you know the 64G or RAM doesn't actually matter. 16G is considered the sweet spot for RAM for gaming anything over that doesn't offer much in the way of performance gain. The only reason you'd need that much ram is if you're doing video or photo editing and have multiple windows open doing all sorts of different things the RAM allows you to switch between those functions, that's what your GPU is. Tge GPU stores functions while gaming while is why a GPU has so much memory built into it. Now if you said you had 16G of DDR5 as opposed to 64G of DDr4 that would make a difference because while it's not more memory it's faster memory which would actually make a difference
@@Andyman269 you clearly do not play Star citizen. :). Also, I use Solidworks on this machine as well.
3070ti and i7 11700k. I imagine the 30 FPS cap will be directed at 1440p or even 4k. I personally play all my games at 1080p still because I find higher resolution with DLSS honestly looks worse then a native render of a lower resolution. I may be wrong but I'm fairly sure as a 1080p gamer I'll be playing this in buttery smooth 144.
I have a 1660ti, really hoping to be able to run it! I don't mind locking the game at 30 & adjusting settings accordingly - the two things I REALLY hate trading for performance is good lighting and fairly high textures. ;_;
I've got an intel i7 12700KF, 32GB DDR5 and an RTX 3070Ti
I have 2 1440P monitors, an ultra wide oled 165Hz and a 27" 240Hz
So I'm hoping to get a steady 60fps on the ultra wide at 1440P. If I can get closer to 120fps that would be awesome, but I'm not expecting that. I think a steady 60fps will look great.
Good video btw. Very to the point and clear.
Hey thank you, I appreciate it! I think you’ll have a great experience, that’s a really nice build you have there 👌
10th gen Intel i7 + RTX 3080 32GB RAM desktop installed on my NVMe SSD AND hopefully also on my 512GB Steam Deck.
Gonna try Starfield with Win 11 Pro, a i7-9700KF CPU an RTX 3060 with 12gb of VRAM and 32 gb of system RAM. Hope my rig can run it decently in 1440. Fingers crossed lol.
Aiming for 1440p high/optimized with a R5 5600X and MSI 6700XT 12GB with 16gb of ram. I'm sure FRS 2.0 will be implmented on a lot of PCs.
Not a wildly different system to mine, hopefully we’ll be ok with a bit of tinkering
kind of silly to not have 32gb of ram on that build
@@justinjohnson8398 yeah I've been getting round to it for 18 months lol.
to my knowledge you wont be doing that. i mean depends what fps you want but those specs arent what you think they are in mid 2023@@GatisKaulinsh
A problem I have with my gaming laptop is that, while it will run any game I've tried thus far, some of them made the vents so hot I couldn't touch them (bought a fan stand for it to sit on that cured that). However, the power supply, and it is a large one, gets so hot that it is worrisome.
My primary tower doesn't have those problems (huge cooling capabilities), per se, but my wife and I have noted that certain games will make the family room much warmer, especially on the side where my comps are.
Maybe you can put the wife in the garage until you need to use her again?
I'm currently running a GTX 1660 6GB Vram 16GB of Ram, have a Ryzen 5 5600 CPU, not sure if us 1660s users are gonna have to fork up 300-500 bucks just to be able to run this game at 60 fps on even minimum settings
I'm similar to you just bought a gaming laptop and upgrading ram to 32gb DDR4 3200 RAM from 16 and have a RTX3070 MAXP @125W mobile with a Ryzen 9 5900HX weakest link obviously being the GPU fingers crossed this should handle at high setting at least on 1660p
I truly hope this will be at least somewhat properly optimized at release. Going to need 4k steady 60fps, and if my main rig with a 5800x, 32Gb of ram, a fast NVMe SSD and a 3080 Ti can't offer that, I'm going to be mad. I can easily live without RT, so here's to hope for steady frames with this setup in 4k.
I do not need the raytracing so will stick with my current setup, Dell 3220 DGF Nvidia Gsynch 164HZ at 2560x1440, Nvdia 2070 Super (matches RTX 2080 non super), Intel i7 10900k and 16 Gigs of RAM.
Really looking forward to this game, even if it's only half of what we've seen it will be outstanding. As for my build, going to be running it on a 5600X and a 6750XT with 32gb ddr4 3200mhz. So GPU is a step down from the recommend, a decent 1440p experience is all I'm after
We need more detailed Requirements
You should be good, got a similar setup myself, 5600x with a 3070, so fingers crossed for us both!
5800x, 32gb of ram, rtx 3080
5700x rtx 306012 gb 32ram🥲😪😮💨🤢
Just finished building a 64gb ryzen 9 3900x with a 16gb rtx 4080 and 2 tb .m2 I expect to be able to max it all out but we shall see, as I am getting Starfield mainly to test the set up :D
5600X, 32gb DDR4-3200, 3070. Should be good to go. One can hope lol.
Hardware wise i'm pretty sure i'm alright: Ryzen 7 5800x3D, 32gb cl16, rx6700XT and 2tb WDblack gen 4 nvme, hoping they manage to use L3 cache so i can take good advantage of my cpu. Targetting 1440p 60fps, anything below hopefully FSR will make up for. Also not gonna use Ray Tracing as generally the implementation is pretty similar to non RT.
Almost exactly what I have except Samsung 980 pro
Newly accquired 6950XT should get the job done. Specifically bought it not just for Starfield but mainly because I wanted a good upgrade from my 3060Ti with more vram in mind. The price point was just too good👍
i9-12900K
RTX 3070 Ti
32 GB of Kingston Fury RAM
Not sure if this is what you wanted???
And this is only if I can not build a new machine before launch
That’s a great build!
@@davidnott_ I want more storage and more RAM; I make games and the work loads are really taxing.
I will be playing on my pc . I have a i9 9900k, 64 GB Ram , MSI Gaming Trio X 4090 and i have already my m2 waiting for it with 1 TB but thinking about buying another m2 with 4TB .
Monitor: ASUS PG32UQX
MOBO: Gigybits X670E Extreme
Storage: M2 WD Black
CPU: AMD 7800X3D
GPU: MSI Suprim Liquid X 4090
Ram: 32 Gig Corsair Vengeance 30cl 6000Mhz
= I AM READY!!!!!
I currently have a 1660 super TI which I'll be using when it gets released, so far this card runs everything I throw at it.
I'll be budgeting to spend out on a 3070ti if it doesn't run well
Just finishing my rig...Hoping It will be good for a while...All AMD 32 Gig XPG Neo...Ryzen 7 5700g...7900xt...1.5 T WD Black ssd...I was nervous about it running Ray tracing ...And still am not quite sold that it will do the job at 100 fps or more.
I’m still convinced by Ray tracing in a lot of titles. It looks different, but I’m not convinced it looks better all of the time, at least not such that I’ll notice while actually playing vs pixel peeping
@davidnott_ yeah...but it's still in its early stages once fully developed it will probably have a lot more effect hope with a little less hit to performance...as of now it's not that noticeable to me either...AR least not t o justify the performance hit hit
I don't know a ton about computers, but for my 40th birthday my brother got me a computer with i7 12700k and a 4090. I am hoping that will run Starfield on ultra at 4k.
Something tells me you’ll be just fine!
Still running an i7 6700k released in 2015 with a 2080ti and I still don't have probs running games today. DCS & MSFS, 2 of the most FPS taxing games on the market both run just fine with 30-60 FPS and that's on a 2K monitor as well. The i5 10600k is only 10% faster at best overall. Not worth the upgrade. I'll stick with what I'm still using and Starfield will run just fine. My hardrive space, lol, now that's a different story. I have 6 different SSD's and they're all pretty much full.
Still on an i5-8400 with a 1070ti, been using it for 6 years now and simply saw no need to upgrade for the type of games I play (mostly mmo and rpg). Assuming Starfield isn’t yet another Todd Special I plan to upgrade to either a 7600 or a 13400 with a 7700 or a 4070, all depending on performance and cost at that moment.
My 8400 and 1070ti have served me well, they're due for a bit of rest.
Same, I gave up on my 1070 ti and i5-8600k after hearing about starfield requierements. They were really a blast back then but they start to struggle. Now with a 4070, i5-13600k, 32 gb ddr 5 and a m2 nvme pci 4.0 SSD im hoping to get good performance with Starfield on 1440p :).
Still running my HP Omen that I bought for right at 1000 back in late 2018..These recommended specs are finally peaking it. i7-8700/32gb/2080. We'll see how it does lol. My mobile is a Legion 7 i7-10750/32/2070Super. Will be interesting to see how they run it. Being Bethesda, it'll be 6 months before it's worth playing i'd bet.
It does not matter if you have the top range equipment, if the pc port is not optimised then you are screwed regardless
I have gtx 1650, i5-11400h and 32gb ram laptop (I did the ram upgrade myself) but in the past I ran rdr2 on 8gb ram at 40 fps max settings plus my gpu wasnt matching req at all, and ive had luck running games that req alot better gpus so i guess only time will tell when it comes to starfield, i pre orderd it a while ago but im pretty nervous, i rlly hope it works even if its only 30 fps or 20.
I’ll be rocking a Ryzen seven 3700 X, and a GTX 1080 16 gigs of RAM, and of course a 500 gig SSD. My 2070 super was murdered. It’s a hard life.
Just built a new rig, so I *SHOULD* be more than ok. Ryzen 5 7600X, RX 7900XT 20GB of VRAM and 32GB of DDR5 RAM.
Current build is a Ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 4060 with 32 GBs of ram and an SSD, hoping for decent performance.
I might have a little stutter every now and then... , i5-7600k, 16gb ddr4 3200, GTX 1660 ti Old school SSD or 7200rpm HDD
ryzen 5 5600 and hopefully a RX 6750 XT 16GB RAM (may be able to upgrade to 32GB) installed on my OS NVME drive. I have 2x1TB SATA SSD for older games and and total of 20TB HDD for large video storage
Will be going into Starfield with a 10980XE, 3090strix OC edition, 256gig Ram, triple rad EK liquid cooled (gpu and cpu) on Samsung Neo Oddessey G9. Hoping FOV and Frames should come up pretty good 🤔🫤