How US Will DESTROY Russia After Putin Uses Nuclear Weapons
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- Go to ground.news/mi... to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
🌍🚀 In a geopolitical chess game, Russia's nuclear threats in Ukraine have the world on edge. With setbacks and U.S. politics influencing the narrative, Europe may bolster support for Ukraine, challenging Russia's stance. Imagine a world where Western military support empowers Ukraine against Russian aggression. Dive into the intricate dance of warfare, politics, and the looming nuclear shadow, where the stakes couldn't be higher. #GlobalPolitics #NuclearThreat #UkraineCrisis #MilitaryStrategy🔥#europe #NATO #russia #ukraine #ukrainewar #militaryanalysis #militarytech #geopolitics
#themilitaryshow
Go to ground.news/militaryshow to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
And why should USA retaliate against Russia for nuking Ukraine ? Why ? Has ukraine signed a defense pact with america ? US will also get nuked to oblivion if they decide to engage in nuclear war with Russia.. Why should the americans risk nuclear war for the sake of an eastern European backwater ?
🖕🫵
Stop spreading fake news, the US will not nuke Russia for using nukes in Ukraine. Ukraine does not hold enough strategic importance to the US to risk US cities being vaporized by a Russian strike. That is the whole point of nuclear deterrence. The US therefore does not / will not face Russia in a conflict directly, only through proxies in limited means. If Russia uses nukes against a NATO state, that is a different conversation.
"Fully informed"?? The only people who might be "fully informed" (as it pertains to the US Military) are the senior Generals and Admirals in the US High Command as well as certain key individuals in the Federal Government (such as the President and Secretary of Defence). As for the rest of us (this also includes "wannabe armchair and video game experts"), all we can do is guess at best.
americans in 2024: was nuking japan justified to end the war faster? yes
same americans if Russians ever start to think like them: WTF thats craaazy
"Live your life as if it's the last day of it" - now becomes very relevant.
The survivors will be in the sun in the west
@@mrgrey9584 What about of just preventing this madness ASAP? What to loose?
I can't afford that every day.
We've been through this before
1952-1955 - US and USSR literally detonating nuclear weapons all over the place to demonstrate their power.
1962-1973 - Cuban Missile crisis to the time when treaties were signed.
1979 - USSR invades Afghanistan, US and USSR deploy nuclear weapons to the borders between East and West.
1983 - USSR thought they'd been nuked, and almost launched their nukes.
1991-1993 - the period of uncertainty as the collapsing USSR fell into chaos.
Choose Jesus Christ and His Blood Sacrifice for your sins.
Get a kjv Bible and learn from the new testament especially how to obey GOD.
Heaven is the Home for Believers in Christ.
No problems with nukes or evil war mongers decieved by satan.
Choose Christ and Live 🙏🙂
"I don't know what weapons World War 3 will be fought with, but the RUclips comment section will be full of people who think they are smart because they can quote Albert Einstein."
"I pooped my pants" - Albert Einstein, age 4
I applaud your pettiness 👏 it is something to behold.
@@anonym1984or some guy named Joe age 81
@@mr.monitor. Why don't you just go to Russia now?
@@mr.monitor. No but we have a lot of witness testimony claiming that DJT wears a diaper and freely unloads his bowls during meetings and other times. DJT also wears a man-girdle.
They would likely respond by announcing that Putin had died of a stroke.
Amen
Or fell out a window !!!!
Had some tea but collapsed afterward.🤷🏽♂️
more likely respond with nuclear attack on US. are you implying the russians are cowards?
Or USA will evaporate
Something to think about: Hydrogen bombs use tritium, which has a half-life around 12 years. You have to replenish the tritium. Given the history of the Russians maintaining their military equipment, it's likely their hydrogen bombs will turn out to be duds.
RS28 is brand new
Keep trying to convince yourself…..
More likely, some DEI hire forgot to fill the tritium reservoirs in the US weapons.
@@kenneth6382 Yeah, and you keep trying to convince yourself that Russia is unbeatable.... while Ukraine invades Kursk. What an embarrassment to you... I guess.
@@BB-gr9hqyou probably have no work ethic, so I’d rather have the deli
Love the A-10. The thing about fighter aircraft is that you expect them to be cool, and they look as fast as they are. The A-10 no beauty queen, but it is one of the most badass aircraft ever made.
Someday soon we will wish we had 10,000 A-10s. The fools want to retire them. WW2 was all about quantity.
@@peternorthrup6274 Well that's two different things but related. I believe that in 1939 that both Europe, and the US had no idea what the US could accomplish in WW2, and the results by 1945 were utterly amazing. The A-10 has to be the most kick-ass ground support, and assault aircraft ever. I'm not sure how 10K of them would be used however. I once read where Herman Goering once tried to conquer some part of northern France using only the Luftwaffe - no ground troops. It was complete failure.
@@peternorthrup6274 its useless in modern combaty given it fought guys with donkey ... its useless against a real army dont be fooledby CALL OF DUTY games
It is, as long as it is used in a situation where the US already has air superiority.
The warthog squadron is basically a kamikaze with a payload to make anything shudder a10 payload is fast deployed and hell. Gorgeous planes but left hand of God.
These type of headlines are the same since 2022...😅
And you want to keep that way.... you dont want to say ever: "he really did it"
Why shouldn't they be? They'll probably be the same in 2025 as well.
Still true though.
Russia has been losing the war on the internet since the war started
Because russia has been threatening the world with nuclear war non stop since 2022.
Buck Turgidson: "I'm not saying we won't get our hair mussed..."
I understood that reference! I do!
@@kyleparish-aaron5764 20-30 million, tops...
@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks.
"Gentlemen you can't fight here...this is the War Room!!!"
@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks!
No one wins with nukes
Untrue. Rad-roaches will flurish in the new world.
13:30. That is just gold. Pure gold
It made me squee
7:44 No American doesn’t want nuclear war. But don’t think the possibility of one will stop the US and our citizens from defending ourselves and our allies.
since when is Ucraine an american ally?
@MichaelBegnini sir you have a brain
@@vidtech2630 🤡
This is why Turkey was denied the F35
US recently said that Turkiye could have F35 planes if it wants to so they started to negotiate the terms again. Moreover, US has already approved 40 units of latest F16 jets and 80 units of F16 upgrade kits for existing fleet of Turkiye.
In addition to that Turkiye has also managed to produce domestically its own fighter jet called "KAAN" and "HURJET".
Because it could be remotely disabled by the USA to ensure it was only used in circumstances explicitly approved by the USA
@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044sandbox guy says that the code thing isn't real
@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 you enjoy your charades eh.
@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb it's the software much like how a Tesla car is controlled
You left out the part where we all die too.
Also left out the part that there will be no U.S. retaliation if the GOP are in control. Putin puppets that they are.
Minor detail😉
Yes. Totally daft. Nobody wins a nuclear war.
🎉🎉😂🎉😂😂🎉🎉🎉
Russia has the same kind of submarine that can carry nuclear wepons that can strike almost all countries of the world.
The stealth drone does exist, i saw one in Afghanistan and we were told it doesnt exist and to not take pics or talk about it 😅
so shut up then.
thank you for your service
Would you like a microphone to announce that.
So why did the Americans leave Afghanistan so suddenly? Were the Talibans THAT scary? The impression here is that Americans always cut and run when the going gets tough.
@@wahyuindrasto No, they left because they were training a country who didn’t want to fight for their freedom, therefore it was just completely useless.
when i need something to cheer me up i watch the military show. the best comedy show on you tube.
I watch videos of Vladimir Putina... The fantasy stories are hilarious!
China’s primary fear of Nuclear escalation is they are immediately down wind. 😂
Western Europe is a lot closer
Best fart ever😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@ryanfarmer4882 But the prevailing wind, especially during the winter months and at altitude are westerly, blowing all the radioactive dust towards Russia and China. Of corse it would soon cross the Pacific to North America falling to the ground with the rain.
The best way to play a game of nuclear, chemical and biological warfare is not to play the game.
That's why deterrence is so important.
The "First Strike" 1980 documentary clearly shows how the Soviets pretend to win a nuclear war.
The old movie War Games
And Russia thinks it’s a world power 😂
As it was said in the 1960s, there will be nobody left and who want the same leader to lead again if some survive.
Actually there would be plenty of people that survived, I mean 30 thousand years after the asteroid wiped out 80% of life on the planet there were huge pockets of life already coming back, and humans are the most adaptable animal on the planet, there's been 5 mass extinction events and every time life makes it through, in the permian extinction 97% of all life was killed and it came back bigger and stronger than ever, this would be no diffrent.
Stop being a pacifist.
He's talking about using tactical nukes in Ukraine, not strategic nukes launched against a NATO country.
For goodness sake there will be whole areas of the planet where the effecct of even a major exchange would hardly register.
@@zackwhite8274 Fat good that would do however.
The real question would be the reaction of China.
For that reason alone I don't think Russia would even consider using nuclear weapons.
A limited response from your enemy is one. Alienating your frenemy is another can of worms.
If Russia will ever using nuclear weapons, it will be too late to think about that. Once its done and Russia shows they are willing to use nuclear weapons, they will become such a threat, the US have to launch and show Putin force with a counter nuclear strike. Then its all escalating into a nuclear exchange. You cant put soldiers on the ground against an opponent which will use nukes whenever necessary because he will nuke whatever force you mustered there. This plan is a recipe for a nuclear disaster.
Sure Captain crunch
Think again... Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and she is not afraid of anybody...
@@solarflare4259😂😂😂😂
China and India will have no option but to go in and strike in retaliation because nukes going off in Russia is basically at their front door
I just had a thought, how technolical are the Nukes? Yes they are nukes, but how accurate are they, how powerful, what condition are they in compared to Western weapons? Are they even operational like the rest of their equipment in Ukraine?
The tritium in Russia's nukes has probably decayed by now.
That is insane…
Russia has in time one of the highest tech Missilse.
Dont think a Nuklear War can be won bey one side.
They say the same about their guns, but l wouldn't dare to be at the other end of an Ak47
@@Ademirb123 well AKs at least are by design good quality. They can be dunked in water, mud, sand, and even under a body(according to a tale I heard a long time ago) and still shoot. Everything else Russias has is always over hyped
@@cameronhermann9400 that is why usa used russian rockets for years to go to the space shuttle eh...your brain is over hyped--russia is way advanced in many areas along with china --russia has nuke shelter for over half its people,usa next to none
I'm 70 and Ruzzia has been threatening the world with nuclear weapons since I can remember.
I'm also 70 and the US has been baiting Russia since I can remember.
Speak out!
Yeas - give us more details on that
Ever been a weapon created that wasn’t widely used in a war ? Sooner or later
Russia is not the only country threatening us with nuclear weapons.
Pretty sure no one will survive here. Peace and dialog is whats needed.
The word "di-alog" implies that there are at least two sides who agree to talk and listen and come to an arrangement. Who would be the second side?
This guy lost me when he mentioned 'Desert Storm.'
It took us 6 months to get the necessary men and equipment in place for that attack.
With zero resistance...
1) US has various existing nato air bases already in Europe with shorter routes into the region.
2) US wouldn’t have to send any land forces since its response would be mainly air strikes, therefore wouldn’t need long prep times. In desert storm, 20% of air launched munitions were smart bombs, today it’s more than 90%.
3) You also were lost when he mentioned the fact that the preparation to use nukes would be detected by satellite surveillance/intelligence.
Russia was able to stage all their forces right on the land border of the country he wanted to attack and has still been getting dogwalked with natos cast offs.
The first move in any war between Russia and NATO is, NATO would most likely seize Kaliningrad
and so what sherlock
Why is Russia against NATO?
Maybe then at least Russia, China and Iran are against NATO.
This will be fair. Although no... Entire NATO doesn't have enough strength even to defeat Russia....economically, lol.
@@avadhutagita3741 That we do not send many weapon systems to Ukraine for fear of them being too overpowered for Russia to hold the line against and Russia resorting to nukes makes it pretty evident that the USA alone would absolutely crush Russia. This is why we are forced to help Ukraine defend itself, otherwise Russia will next get its ass kicked by invading a NATO country and then resort to nukes out of desperation. As demonstrated by the Ukrainians, Russia is not the behemoth conventional adversary it was once believed to be. We assume though, because there exists insufficient evidence, that there is no reason to bet that Russia is no longer a nuclear adversary behemoth like no other. As far as "Why is Russia against NATO?", I suspect Russia's fear of losing the empire's hold over the 100+ conquered ethnicities and nationalistic fantasy of returning to the good old days of the USSR's power play a big role. Certainly NATO's hesitation to embrace a nation that remembers the monster Stalin as a hero plays its role too.
@@avadhutagita3741that's based on what exactly? Russia's economy is smaller than Italy's... Or even Texas, California, or even Florida.
Sooner or later reality will hit hard.
In Kaliningrad, there are more nukes in one square meter than people. You wont seize such place as it would immidiately start a nuclear war by rather shooting all of those missiles than left them to your enemy.
We’re done….good bye life on earth
I agree cousin.
Stop being such a lazy drama queen and do some research. The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs was equal to about 10 billion WWII-era atomic bombs, and even it didn't kill all the life on earth. It did make it less interesting though.
@@ronaldphillips8750don’t ever say that cringy ass shit ever again
Russia couldn’t even stop a bunch of farmers.😛
BUNCH OF FARMERS WITH US AND ENTIRE EUROPE WEAPONS DOESNT HAVE A COUNTRY HALF OF IT IS WITH RUSSIA 😂
Still a bunch of farmers. You think Putin would attack a country with an army that could defend it self? No…
keep living in delusions
@@michaelvoisine7075 WELL ENTIRE EUROPE AND NATO HAS SENT BEST ARMS RUSSIANS ARE FIGHTING FOR PAST ONE YEAR UKRAINE COMEDIAN PRESIDENT HAS LOST HALF OF HIS COUNTRY
The same farmers that the US encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan? Oh do not forget Vietnam.
Considering that the former nuclear power plant in Chernobyl... (Yes, THAT Chernobyl.) is between Kiyv and the border with Belarus, that would seem to make the likelihood of Russian tactical nuclear weapons use a little more possible...
WRONG ! Russia will not use nucs in Ukraine ( on her own doorstep? ) Why would it ? No sir. Nucs are reserved for Brits , Europe and US. End of story.
Purely hypothetical. Let's hope that peace can attained beforehand.
And if it isn't?
That requires "removing" the KGB Mafia gov't completely.
US will never agree to a peace agreement, they want to fight the Russians until the last Ukrainian
Even with a really limited nuclear exchange (1-2 each side), breaking the nearly 80 year streak of no one using nukes besides for testing (and since the mid 60s only underground tests were allowed) would mean the world could never again be the same. Like how the US was never really the same after 9/11 but this would be on a far greater scale.
Yeah, it would irradiate more steel so that it could not be used for astronomy purposes again in many lifetimes, it would throw off all calculations for carbon 14 in tooth enamel making it harder for criminal investigators to determine the age of corpses, it would possibly require more soil treatment for areas of the most fertile part of Europe and in fourth place it might make some people more likely to use tactical nukes in the future, now that they have actually seen how much damage they cause.
Oh wait, this is like climate change right, one nuke used is one too many?
France did atmospheric tests in Polynesia until 1974.
@@rickfrombohemia9550 And what did the Polynesians have to say about that?
Russia literally nuked someone in London in 2006 if you think about it...
Eure Nation ist die einzige die jemals Atomwaffen gegen ein anderes Land eingesetzt und über Großstädten abgeworfen hat.
Ihr solltet was dieses Thema betrifft mit etwas mehr bedacht herangehen.
Dog barks the loudest doesn’t bite.
Or, as my granny said, "The empty bucket rattles loudest."
Had siberian husky ,pitbull mongrel an he couldn't bark when people came over the fence in the backyard to break in he walked up an grabbed them they never heard it coming all you heard was screams an had to go outback pull him off an call the cops an give him a biscut say good boy
Until he does. THEN WHAT?
@@ggaggagga4then Russia no longer exists.
@@ryanwarner5006 Proove it!
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face 😂😂😂
USA had plans on Abram tanks too😂😂
🤣… how many ruzzian tanks are over 😁
@@Gmordor How many NATO tanks are destroyed 😂
@@GmordorSoviet Tanks helped both Ukraine and Russia to gain territories left and right and on the other hand, Abrams,Leopards and Challengers did absolutely nothing except getting barbecued 😂
Ukraine is toast without the need for nukes. The rest of the supposition is bunk
I certainly hope not. That would kill 100,000,000 innocent people.
Who's innocent? The people finance it, watch it and ignore it. Not innocent, complicit.
@@vernevens1598 Even the women and children?
@@davidhess6593 Everyone that lives in the country. Your money, your country and government you voted for.
@@vernevens1598 That's MAD.
@@davidhess6593 What's mad is a population that will sit and watch their government illegally invade and destroy other countries without batting an eye then claim to be innocent.
Only way to win is not to play
12:50 - "...intercepted BY the target's main hull" would be more accurate
yes because they have PRONOUN TRAINING - Thats their secret weapon LMAO
I see them as pets being protected and allowed to wave their tails running around carefree. They've got no business with American military capability.
I LOVE watching comedy channels.
this channel is pretty biased, take whatever they say with a grain of salt and move on
Brother in arms, blood is thicker than water . Wisdom wins . Preparedness prevents war but assured peace .
Nobody win...all of us gonna die in the first 1 hour
The people that started it all will stay alive in their bunkers for years.
it is not about personal win and survival, rather about personal sacrifice for future and survival of your nation!
beautifully said bro☺🤭😵💫👀
@@tomislavivankovic6971
There'll literally be N O T H l N G left. This war is unwinnable apart from negotiating with Russia for peace, otherwise Its beyond any discussion. Extinction is the only path of a nuclear war
Only rats and flies win in wars.
There are many more larger missiles to go through and gain precious data before nukes are seriously considered. FOABs for instance
“If WW3 is fought with nuclear weapons, then WW4 will be fought with bows and arrows” - Prince Charles, now King Charles 3.
If he said it, he plagiarized Einstein.
@@JamesOfEarthuncle Albert said “sticks and stones”
@@cadredeux1047 modified☺
B-52 still going strong. 💪
😂
An ancient fucking TURKEY.
Yep. Ponder this for a second. I'm 60yrs old. The newest B52 is older than I am, and is scheduled to be in service for another ~20yrs. Crazy.
flying targets just like anything that floats,rolls,in a real war they are gone in the first hour and why russia,china have hundreds of thousands of missiles,rockets--usa,nato are stupid
Bluffing is in the blood and culture of the American
Russia would never use N-weapons against city. Reason? Ukraine lost 8000 civ-s according to UN. While Iraq lost 1.6 million civ-s of wich 300.000 were kids. Breathtaking difference in civ casualties shows how incredibly carefully Russians conduct this operation compared to US invasions, so why would they sudenly decide to nuke Ukraine?
This is insanity .
yep sure is.
This is what humanity does, perfectly reasonable in the scheme of things.
It is insanity, but many think nuclear exchange can somehow make Russian nuclear forces less capable than they are, or Nato defenses better.
Person who made this video was either payed to do it, or is not aware of the fact nuclear exchange will end the world as we know it.
Tell that to Tsar Putrid I'm sure he's interested in your comments.
Who forced his hand ?
this would end putins regime, and probably russia. is he that vain and selfish that if he cant have ukraine, nobody will? this would be putins suicide tactic.
I will just say that Hitler had same opinion about Russia and their capability for war. 🤷♂ Never ever underestimate country that have aggressive history against their own population, and just by incident have 1000 nuclear warheads. Russia is the one that have much less to loose comparing to America.
Things would get really proportional, really fast.
Aha! A kindred spirit. All praise @FatElectrician !
Just think about it.....U.S never really won any war....Afeganistão, vietnam, Somália...name it. The only thing that was a game changer were the nukes attacks on a country that did not have nukes. So...cut the crap.....enough of U.S will do this...or do that. If they were so certain...just go to Ukraine and fight for Ukraine directly.
Let's get rid of this monster once and for all, quit pacifying him. Putin
😂😂😂, c'est vous qui vont disparaître
Rancidfart... impressive
Get rid off.. How idiotic. It is not OK for someone to get rid of any leader because they don't like them..Putin in case your interested has an 87 % approval rate in russia and it's their country and their leader not yours.
You don’t understand…WEF causing America to act this way.If Russia vanished the wars would continue until America falls and that’s why many support Putin.Your news is fed by WEF owned MSN and that’s why the West like yourself are brainwashed.
You made a significant gaffe starting @1:44. Ukraine is not threatening to choke off Russia's ability to export oil. They are only attacking refineries to make it more difficult to fuel their war machine near the front, not their oil production. These are 2 separate entities, and the distinction is important. I will continue watching the video, but I question if your thesis can be defended. *edit* The rest of the video was well done, but the original argument wasn't supported. Well researched and well presented overall. Thanks for your work and please continue as I enjoy your channel.
I feel so sorry for the Russians, so many people dying trying to take a neighbor, now the world knows how weak Russians military is.
The bear only has a bark !
I know some idiots will come here and say "Yeah USA is gonna blow em up if they date to nuke us!"
But the question is; Will you be alive to see if the USA would even stand the chance to retaliate? 😂
The USA is the only country to use Nukes . Now what dose that tell you ????? 4 words DON’T FUCK WITH US ..
STOP THE WAR MONGERING VIDEOS NOW AND MAKE PEACE!! EVERYBODY!!!
Sure. Just get Putin to withdraw from Ukraine and stop murdering its people.
Though russia has 5700 nuclear war heads, they don't have the missile to carry them 65% of their missiles have falled. Not just in russia but also in North Korea. Most of there missiles are full of water.
The bat wing plane. The one they show at superbowls
Russia has around 6500 nukes, only less than 2000 active, a third of those high yield, 2 thirds low yield. High yield nukes delivered by rockets and missiles probably around 1000 if not less. NATO has similar numbers but 2 thirds are high yield. There are over 20.000 cities in the West, around a billion people. There are some 1100 cities in Russia, some 145 million people. In a full nuclear exchange, Russia must choose its targets carefully, it can not hit them all, not enough nukes. But the West has enough nukes to hit all cities in Russia several times and still have spares. In the absolutely worst case scenario, 300 million westerners would die but Russia would be GONE FOREVER!
You say things on RUclips but not things that are real on ground.
@@africanintelligentrevoluti1446 What exactly is your point? Enlighten us!
@@3ast3rn3r What I say is,
Actually, western are still having in their minds, the old world but things have changed.
So now there's no America that will still say I am the best in this or no one is that.
US is never again the first power at all for were they tempt to have some advantages, they are beaten somewhere else and annihilating the power.
1-Fort air furtivity, US are not the first or the only one.
2-For missiles, US are not the first or the only one.
3-For the nukes, US are not the first.
4-For Economy, US aren't longer the first.
So they can never carry again any war like before against the 3 firsts like China, Russia or India.
Times have changed
enjoying your life in a fantasy world? so 300 millions lives would be a chicken change?
@@AfiaA.-vb3xz Nobody mentioned any chickens! The point was, if a full blown nuclear war were to happen tomorrow, the West would lose a third of the population, while Russia would be forever gone, erased from history! And under these circumstances, Russia is still the one threatening with nuclear war! If I were Biden, I would remind them publicly what the situation is and advise them to go easy with the threats!
Video was well done, but title was deceptive and at least bordered on clickbait.
WTF is wrong with people. We need peace ☮️
Go tell that to Putin.
@@chrisperrins8082 If you really think Ukraine is about protecting the Ukrainian people then you definitely voted Brandon.
The MALDs were named after Karl Malden from his acting carreer , esp from the TV hit , The Steets of San Francisco also starring Michael Douglas. 👍
China would immediately stop selling Americans giant flat screen TVs 😮
Will any any of the two nations survive it
Most of the people of both nations will survive it. But only one will remain a nation. And it won't be Russia.
@@ixnorp4270 survival in a destroyed habitat, non will emerged as a viable nation
A child wrote this title. A child that doesn't understand Russia has missiles with nuclear warheads pointed at the USA
and the US has nuclear missiles pointed at Russia, what's your point?
@@Jadefox32the point is US would do nothing and tremble when Russia hits Ukraine with nukes
@@JusticeGranville-uk8wwthats wrong, and i can prove that in seconds. If ukraine gets hit with nukes, then nuclear fallout and radioactive particles will enter into NATO territory. If you look into the NATO articles, the NATO Members are FORCED to intervene if something like that would happen. So no, youre wrong.
@@Jadefox32 get owned
@@JusticeGranville-uk8ww “the point is US would do nothing and tremble when Russia hits Ukraine with nukes”
You are mistaking a Promise as a Bluff.
I was in US Naval Aviation (P3C) for 10 years during the cold war with the USSR. Tactical Nukes were part of the US Military doctrine.
Our Flight Crews were required to be Nuke Load certified once a year and every so often I would see a bird roped off with a Dummy Nuke sitting on an ordinance rack being loaded by a flight crew. Not once did my thought process go,
“We will never use them.”,
instead in went,
“Someday that could be the real thing.”.
Stop all wars , no winners
Wrong. The banks win, the military industrial complex wins.
Talk to Putin about that.
The US has already anything it would. The notion that the US would destroy Russia is really exaggerated. The repercussion of a US strike on Russia would be dire for all of us
The first thing ALL of you should realize is that the Ukraine is NOT a NATO member, put this before anything you want to reply.
Any tactical nuke attack against the ukraine would not come unprovoked ( ukrainian forces have before attacked Russian defensive infra structure like the early warning stations, which are a part of Russia's nuclear deterrence and NOT actively involved in the special operation against the ukraine ) , any Nato ( US ) retaliation against a tactical strike by Russia to the ukraine is a direct act of war from NATO against Russia which would expose all NATO countries with the danger of being retaliated against. Some smaller Nato members would still support a strike against Russia, but Major members do not want to face total annihilation by supporting a rouge corrupt state as ukraine, just because some entities withing the US are playing the game to weaken Russia in order to step in if the country fails to scoop up all the mineral rights steal resources and leave the Russian population to starve.
That's the whole set up since the very beginning of the conflict since mr B. Johnston derailed the peace negotiations in 2022.
So there will be NO total destruction of Russia by the USA without total destruction of the latter by Russia M.A.D and so called NATO partners like France will jump ship if they see they might get damaged the same counts for Germany and Poland who is not sure they should fight this in the 1st place. Belgium, Netherlands and Denmark might want to fight, but their population will revolt and politicians will turn on a dime. The new Members Sweden and Finland will opt out of any action on behalf of a USA only advantage. The Baltic states will support the USA but will be warned only once and again the population like from all other countries want's to survive.
To close this reply, A ( provoked ) nuclear tactical attack will go 98% unanswered by NATO as nobody wants to sacrifice their populations. ( The same counts for Russia, Putin is not interested in sacrificing his population and risk retaliation, however a direct strike by any country against it's nuclear deterrence will not go unanswered.
The idea is to prevent their use.
The US won't be first-use. Putin on the other hand, I'm not so sure
both sides having them is the prevention. Neither side can stop the return volley. Even if Russia nuked the Pentagon, US AWACS aircraft would assume command and control of US nuclear subs around the world. I'm sure Russia had similar redundancies in place if Moscow was hit. There is no escape or "winning" for either side. That is what has prevented nuclear weapons from being used for over 70 years and it's not changing any time soon. Don't bother listening to the saber rattling from Putin. In the 70's and 80's the nuclear rhetoric was even worse than it is now.
What nucleat threat number are we from bunker grandpa and his serfs are we on by today? Number 20?
38
The human race is at a moment of historic danger: The Doomsday Clock is still 90 seconds to midnight! 90 seconds away from the destruction of human civilization and possibly the human race.
Some history helps with context as to the significance of the Clock;
Founded in 1945 by Albert Einstein, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and University of Chicago scientists who helped develop the first atomic weapons in the Manhattan Project, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the Doomsday Clock two years later, using the imagery of apocalypse (midnight) and the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero) to convey threats to humanity and the planet. The Doomsday Clock is set every year by the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board in consultation with its Board of Sponsors, which includes nine Nobel laureates. The Clock has become a universally recognized indicator of the world’s vulnerability to global catastrophe caused by man-made technologies.
Dmitri Peskov: "US aid is causing more Ukrainian casualties!" Coming from the aggressor’s side, this level of gaslighting is just... beyond everything imaginable … wow. &&&&&&&&&&&&&
Well maybe Ukrainian is going to fight till the last man
What are we talking about here us all being dead? 😂
The financial meltdown is uncontrollable
"What do you think?" I think that Russia would escalate to Strategic weapons incliding ICBM MIRVs. And humanity might survive extinction--or it might not.
Humanity could survive.....but civilization cannot. We will be back into early bronze age in minutes.
He's not going to launch strategic nukes against any nuclear capable countries such as the U.S., France or Great Britain, because he knows that would be the end of him.
For an absoulte certainty not much of Russia or the Russian population will see their grandchildren reach adulthood.
I think Putin would likely hit New York City by itself, since that's about the dumbest decision he could possibly make, and he seems to like to make the dumbest decisions possible. Assuming he could even give the order to launch nukes.
@@Scaleyback317 Nor the Americans, so what's the point?
I don't know if automatic by RUclips or a setting by the content creator but these double ads in the beginning AND middle AND end of this video is excessive
AdBlock exists for a reason
I got tired of ads. Premium is worth it. Other than that, find a good ad blocker
Adblock plus, also works well on X.
U Tube in the last few days has tripled or many more ads I guess they are trying to become Zillionaires in 60 days???
Where do these folks get the idea that Ukraine is losing support. Wake up everyone has doubled down with more help.
Remember when Ukraine was flooded with 200bn weapons for their amazing counteroffensive? Remember what stelar sucess it was? What do you think 60bn will change? It will prolong Ukrainian demise and make it more bloody.
Well, well let me see. Going on three years for a three week "SMO" that didn't happen. Meat waves attacking instead of trained, prepared or equipped soldiers. I like Ukraine's chances of outlasting Moscovia.
@@OleDiaBole remember putin his " 3 days to kyiv " , those days are quite long already?
Russia's best men are gone already, and wich outcome he think he will get from this war?
Embarssed his own country,the red army just proves to be camo wearing folks with guns wich doesnt work properly or are not even trained, the majestical su57 is still a mythe, and they use a lot of outdated material (wich is kinda funny since ukraine had even more older soviet stuff but theirs functioning more than russia's own material)
and offers their own people to either join army and die or go to jail for not joining army and only get out if they do (or they fall out of their windows 🤡)
Best for russia is to retreat and war will end, simple as that
If ukraine stops defending there will be no ukraine left
Either putin retreats or GIVE UKRAINE ALL THE SUPPORT THEY NEED
Because before war, i think everyone would know some russian guy and we all liked them as people we met at travelling, when going out, but their government is fucking that image of russians in general wich this dumb war
@@jw8567 I guess the biggest loss of war (Avdiika) was taken by shovels as well?. kyslivka & Netailove were just taken today: the front lines are collapsing. A Ukrainian brigade fled a Russian advance at Krasnorivka today. If you actually followed the conflict instead of parrot CNN or whatever RUclips videos you watched from 2022, you will know Russian has advantage of manpower, resources, and time. How can Ukraine outlast Russia when they are literally forcing conscriptions and Russian military is bigger now than it was day of invasion. You are horribly misinformed
Yes , double support , theble losses 😂😂😂
This is foolish thinking in nukela war no country wins , stop living in a fools paradise
Unfortunately Ukraine's attacks on Russia's has caused a reduction of 14% only in production and the Russians are repairing the damaged plants quickly.
“Have no fear for atomic energy, cause non of them can stop the time..” Bob Marley.
Irie!!!!
What an insightful eloquent commentary
So not profound quoting the stoned ramblings of a long dead pothead. 😂🤡🤣
Don't our satellites keep track of their movable nukes? Can they do it?
Of course
nope, gps are too far
low orbit cant stay same place, they need to turn around the earth to stay in orbit and russia is big
and good luck to track truck when cloud block your sight
@vkobevk you have no clue what you're talking about.
@@HalfTonChevy so plz tell me how your magic satellite work ???
and go ahead prove than satellite can see trought cloud
@vkobevk Google it. There are many ways. Look at what james' web telescope can do. And you really believe clouds block view? 🤣 Wake up, bro. It's 2024
USA wont risk New York for Kyiv.
Will Russia risk Moscow for Ukraine? Don't forget the weapons Russia has the west also has and better.
Will Russia risk St. Petersburg, Moscow, and Vladivostok? This goes both ways comrade.
Will Russia risk 75% of its territory which is Siberia, which China would take once Russia has lost the war?
Dont forget the west doenst have the weapons russia has; hyperballistic nuclear rockets, russias nuclear weapons are very effective
@@BranislavB-hx9zysure Russia is losing 🤡
Your belief that the US would defend Ukraine in this scenario is beyond me. If Trump is elected, he wouldn’t move a finger…
If trump is elected the wars will likely be over. None of this bs was happening when he was president.
Unlike Russia, when the US is making military threats is not prone to b...shit.
Exactly how competent is the Russian nuclear weapons? We know how competent the military and equipment are!!! lmao
Хочешь проверить?)
they've been pushing all of nato back with shovels and turtle tanks
So the west overated their weapons and they were all destroyed. How many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of western weapons have been sent to Ukraine? All destroyed by Russian weapons
Why don’t you find out? Hiding behind a keyboard ?? 😅
@@JR-sn8cf The world has already found out how incompetent the Russian military is. One only has to look at their war against Ukraine. No reason that anyone would think that Russian nuclear forces would be competent too.
The person who made this video watches CNN 😂
This has clearly been prepared by the White House for CNN.
The main thing is that the author does not watch russia today.
U.S.A Government will take out everything even their allies just to get the enemies 😂
Putin is probably peeing of fear just watching this video
talk garbage
Russia has troops in Ukraine. It would not use tactical nuclear.
Since when is CNN, NBC, NY TIMES, WASHINGTON POST and a lot of others “right leaning”?!?🤨
What also Russia can't see is our new B-21 UCAV Stealth Bomber 😁
WW3 will not be fought using Bombers , its 2024 now not 1941
What does that even mean when it won’t have a home to return to it land. This macho and bravado nonsense is useless with nuclear inhalation.
they can see it easily--a farce--anything that flys or floats is a target
what the yanks cant see is russias new posidon nuke torpedo with a 100 megaton warhead goodby the big apple
😂😂😂😂😂😂
The force multiplier effect can easily overwhelm the enemy even just by using conventional weapons. The enemy would be attacked from many directions all weather , day , night, stealth and with conventional air superiority it would be all over in 24 hours .
'you always have a plan before you get punched in the face"
I second that from a guy who been in a real fight and not on a keyboard on RUclips.
24 hrs? It took a month just to bring down Iraq's defenses during Desert Storm
YUPP!! And Iraq was a piece of cake while Afghanistan was a stroll in the garden. Also Iran was supposed to be as easy to flip as a pancake. How did all that turn out for y'all, huh?
@@wahyuindrasto Don't get carried away. Iran might be formidable within their borders but outside they are not. Their recent attack on Israel was a joke.
You forgot to mention nukes can be launched from submarines. They would launch and go back under leaving no way to retaliate directly against the launcher
This is joke channel.
Don't be ridiculous, every single ruzzian sub is shadowed by an American sub.
@@GeorgeStar only in open water, but not near their base it is too risky, i am not sure usa want to see their sealwolf being captured or sinked in russian water
and anyway lol to try to track mobile truck on 17 million km square
The Military Show is obviously funded by America's MIC (military industrial complex), which profits from endless warfare. They assume a Cold War launch scenario with Russian based ICBM's. North Korea is building (or has already built) short range missile launchers into shipping containers, which can be fired from any cargo ship. My bet is Russia has them also. Fired from just off America's coastline, there would be no way to intercept them. And 80% of America's population lives within 200 miles of its coasts.
@GeorgeStar that's funny, seriously??
Obviously you don't know the difference between international waters and territorial waters. Do you think US subs are "shadowing" Russian subs in their waters? "Every single sub" 🤣🤣🤣
i spent all my 58 years of life being bullied by the soviets , and now by the Russians, I don't know about the rest of you, but I am feedup with this bulling...not scared, just pissedoff
No, re US capabilities. Imagine Ukraine drones increasing in intensity by 10 X or more, just that, disrupt any remaining infrastructure.
United Kingdom/Great Britain 🇬🇧 (UK/GB) vs North Korea 🇰🇵 (NK/DPRK), who would win in a conflict without nukes involved
Where do they fight? Why, and how? They're about as far away as countries can get, as the ship sails...
Brittain would not have to fight alone.
no chance at all if it were to measure up to the west.NK has nooo
If UK invaded NK they lose
If NK invades UK they lose. It's a lose lose situation
I'm not sure North Korea have much animosity towards the UK, there are embassies in both nations.
USA hasn’t faced a peer on peer conflict in a long while. Russia now has battle hardened troops . They also have the ability to vaporise USA and uk along with its allies in a blink of an eye.
The U.S would destroy Russia and China both. If Russia uses Nuclear weapons what do you think would happen to Russia? Are they the only ones with Nukes? The U.S. has just as many as Russia does and probably a whole lot more potent.
That is so funny! Thank you for the laugh.....
@@ixnorp4270 you mind find that funny bit it’s not off the truth. USA would suffer great losses in a confrontation with Russia. They won’t be able to use their air power like they did against far lesser rivals and have to face the drones and missiles along with the most advanced anti air defence systems in the world. That’s one reason they are using Ukrainian troops . Bargain as they put it.
That is, if their neglected nukes still work..
@@user-nk7xu8uy7c neglected ? Russia has the modern delivery systems in word. Surpasses anything USA or Europe has.
So, was Russia that reckless to rely on Western technology for oil refining?
West wasnt expected to backstab and become unfairly hostile post 1995. It slowly tried to harm like boiling a frog
no choice
all russian tech is western tech. russia dosent make anything except war. (they couldnt even make a car. remember the lada?)
@@ronchasr6656 and you are still losing with best nato missiles, drones, tanks, air defense failing against them ? You are losing lol
Stop dreaming mate!!!@@meteorknight999
It makes me Ill as an American that we would as the leaders of the FREE WORLD abandon a struggling democracy whom was attacked by a terrorist nation. This just cannot happen. Please don’t do that …proud American 🇺🇸 who supports Ukraine.
😂
Russia talks like their are the only ones with Nukes, and if their nukes are as good as the rest of their army...lol
They released a video of like a dozen missiles all launched simultaneously, all neatly lined up in a row.
By the time they were 100, maybe 150 meters up, three of them were already swerving off course.
And THIS is what they released to the world!